City Wide Medical Oncology Rounds Friday Sept. 21 st, 2007 The Latest is the Greatest Future Directions in the Management of Patients with Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer Mark Clemons Head, Breast Medical Oncology Group Princess Margaret Hospital Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research
Conflict of interest Clinical Research Protocols Roche (ibandronate) Lab studies Amgen (denosumab), Novartis (zoledronic acid) Talks AstraZeneca (zactima), Novartis (zoledronic acid), Roche (ibandronate) Bone Metastases Program at PMH Novartis (zoledronic acid)
Treating bone metastases How does bone, health affect my patients? Preserving bone mineral density Preventing metastases
Background Metastatic breast cancer Bone metastases incidence consequences Why does breast cancer go to bone? Are current management strategies the, best? Clinical Trials The Future
Metastatic Bone Disease is Common More lytic 5-year world prevalence, thousands 1 Incidence of BM in cancers 2 Median survival, Months 2-4 Myeloma 144 70-95 6-54 Renal 480 20-25 12 Melanoma 533 14-45 6 Bladder 1,000 40 6-9 Thyroid 475 60 48 Lung 1,394 30-40 6-7 Breast 3,860 65-75 19-25 Prostate 1,555 65-75 12-53 More blastic 1. Ferlay J, et al. IARC Globocon 2000. Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Prevalence. 2. Coleman RE. Cancer Treat Rev. 2001;27:165-176. 3. Coleman RE. Cancer. 1997;80:1588-1594. 4. Zekri J et al. Int J Oncol. 2001;19:379-382.
Bone metastases are common and important! Over 5,000 Canadian women will die of breast cancer this year Majority either presented with or subsequently developed bone metastases (BM) Two-thirds of patients with BM will subsequently develop skeletal related events (SRE)
What do I do for Mrs J? Confirm that she has metastatic breast cancer Tell her it is incurable Consider radiotherapy for pain in back (or US trial) Change tamoxifen (or trial) Start a bisphosphonate (or trial)
What do I do for Mrs J? She then says, What does the future hold for me with all these bone metastases?
Consequences of bone metastases in breast cancer: Mortality Median overall survival of patients with bone only or dominant disease: 2 3 years pathologic fracture: 12 months spinal cord compression: 4 months hypercalcemia: 3 months
The Bisphosphonates Inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption BPs plus to chemo or hormonal therapy significantly Reduce and delay SREs An integral part of clinical practice of patients newly diagnosed with BM
The bisphosphonates are not a panacea! Still need analgesia, surgery, radiotherapy, chemo / endocrine therapy Even with IV BP around 50% will not have a symptomatic response Absolute reduction in number and rate of SREs 13% Even with the most potent BP zoledronic acid therapy 30% of patients will have SREs in the following 2 years Maximisation of BP benefit is needed either: Some patients do not need a BP BPs are ineffective in some patients Route and schedule of administration are not optimal
Can we use bisphosphonates more effectively i.e. why is the absolute benefit so small? When should we START bisphosphonates? practice guidelines: initiate BPs at diagnosis of bone metastases Breast cancer trials contain highly selected patients i.e. the one size fits all model does not work! majority bone-only disease (61 70%) overall 13% reduction in SREs: population with a relatively favorable prognosis eligibility criteria include a prognosis of >6 months survival
Percentage of patients with bone only disease Study N Bone only disease S&W 190 29% Hortobagyi 1996 380 60-62% Theriault 1999 372 66-72% Body 2003 466 65-68% Tripathy 2004 435 NA Kohno 2005 228 49%
Percentage of patients with bone only disease Study N Bone only disease James 267 32% Plunkett 859 25-35% The incidence of fractures - highest in pts with bone only metastases - lowest in those with co-existing liver disease. James et al. Bone metastases from breast carcinoma: histopathological - radiological correlations and prognostic features. British Journal of Cancer (2003) 89, 660-665. Plunkett TA, Smith P, Rubens RD. Risk of complications from bone metastases in breast cancer: implications for management. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:476-482.
There are essentially 3 groups of patients: Lower risk group where SREs are not a great issue Probably over treated High risk group who with appropriate therapy can move to the (and hopefully stay there) Correctly treated Worst risk group what ever you do they will continue to have SREs, need new treatment strategies Need to be better treated
Increased Bone Resorption is the Hallmark of Metastatic Bone Disease NTX excretion (nmol/mmol creatinine) Pathological >100 Postmenopausal women /older men 50-100 Normal young women/men 0-50 0 10 20 30 40 % 50 Prostate (n=611) Breast (n=744) Myeloma (n=318)
Can N-telopeptide be used to guide more effective treatment strategies for patients with bone metastases? NTX is correlated with: Presence of bone mets Symptoms Response to treatment Progression Survival
Use of Bone Resorption Markers to Direct Zoledronic Acid Therapy - BISMARK 1400 patients with bone metastases from breast cancer Bone resorption assessed every 16 weeks- Urinary NTX Primary endpoint: Risk of skeletal events (SRE) with time Non-inferiority design R A N D O M I S E Bone marker (NTX) directed therapy Q 4, 8 or 16 weeks Zoledronic acid 4mg iv 3-4 weekly
Zoledronic Acid Oral Ibandronate Box & Whisker Plot: Worst Pain Score Worst Pain Score 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 4.5 3.5 Worst Pain Score 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.5 1.5 Baseline Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 8 P < 0.001 ±1.96*Std. Err. ±1.00*Std. Err. Mean 2.0 1.5 ±95%CI ±1.00*Std. Err. Baseline Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 3 Wk 4 Wk 8 Wk 12 Mean *p = 0.081 and 0.028 Box & Whisker Plot: Number of Pain Sites Reported Number of Pain Sites Reported 3.4 3.8 3.0 2.6 2.2 1.8 Number of Pain Sites 3.2 2.6 2.0 1.4 1.0 1.4 0.6 Baseline Week 4 Week 8 Week 12 P < 0.001 ±1.96*Std. Err. ±1.00*Std. Err. Mean 0.8 Baseline Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 3 Wk 4 Wk 8 Wk 12 *p = 0.037 and 0.004 ±95%CI ±1.00*Std. Err. Mean 4.2 Box & Whisker Plot: Log NTX (corrected for Cr) Over Time 4.2 Log Urinary NTX (corrected for Cr) Over Time 4.0 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 Urinary NTX Levels 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 3.0 2.8 Baseline Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 8 Week 12 p= 0.008 ±1.96*Std. Err. ±1.00*Std. Err. Mean 2.8 2.6 Baseline Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 3 Wk 4 Wk 8 Wk 12 *p < 0.01 ±95%CI ±1.00*Std. Err. Mean
Bone Biopsy Program
RANK/RANKL Pathway Mechanism of action of AMG 162 RANKL is a critical mediator of OC differentiation, function and survival Growth Factors Hormones Cytokines RANKL RANK AMG 162 CFU-M Pre-Fusion Osteoclast Multinucleated Osteoclast OB BONE Activated Osteoclast
So what s new?
AMG 162 (Denusomab) Fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL Opposes osteoclast differentiation and activation by binding to RANK-Ligand
Breast Cancer Phase 1: Inhibition of Bone Turnover in AMG 162 vs. Pamidronate Urinary NTx/Creatinine % of Baseline (Mean ± SD) 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 14 28 42 56 70 84 Time (day) 0.1 mg/kg (n=5-7) 0.3 mg/kg (n=5-7) 1.0 mg/kg (n=6-7) 3.0 mg/kg (n=3) pamidronate 90 mg Peterson MC, et al. Proc. ASCO 2004
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of Denosumab Compared With Zoledronic Acid (Zometa ) in the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Subjects with Advanced Breast Cancer (20050136) Status: Recruiting Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if denosumab is noninferior to zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in subjects with advanced breast cancer Phase 3
Summary Bone is the most common site of recurrence of breast cancer Presence of bone metastases and the occurrence of skeletal related events affects both morbidity and mortality Despite the widespread use of BPs it remains unclear Magnitude of individual benefit? Which BP to use? Who to treat? When to treat? For how long? Biomarkers of bone destruction now exist and will hopefully enable improved targeting of patients in the future
So Is The Latest the Greatest? Future Directions in the Management of Patients with Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer
Fixed Schedule Treatment NTX level Bisphosphonate treatments 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Rob Coleman Durable endocrine response? Over-treated Aromatase Inhibitor 0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 Weeks SRE 26 treatments Over 112 weeks 1 SRE NTX
Marker Directed Treatment NTX level Bisphosphonate treatments 160 140 120 100 Sequential response and progression SRE SREs 15 treatments Over 112 weeks 3 SRE 80 60 40 Docetaxel 20 Exemestane 0 Non-steroidal AI 0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 Rob Coleman Weeks NTX level
So Is The Latest the Greatest? Future Directions in the Management of Patients with Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer These agents are not without side effects that may become increasingly important if bisphosphonates move into the adjuvant setting