ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK

Similar documents
PSHE: Personal wellbeing

School of Social Work

Eastern Michigan University School of Social Work Field Evaluation: MSW Advanced Concentration Mental Illness and Chemical Dependency

SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM Field Education Coordinator s Evaluation of Practicum Agency

Core Competencies for Peer Workers in Behavioral Health Services

Not skilled at all Beginning skill Moderate skill Advanced skill Expert skill

ESTRO RTT Code of Ethics and Conduct. ESTRO RTT Committee MICHELLE LEECH, LAURA MULLANEY, PHILLIPP SCHERER

PROJECT TEACH: ETHICS DIDACTIC

SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM Field Education Director s Evaluation of Practicum Agency

VALUES IN THE CURRICULUM

FORDHAM UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SERVICE 113 W. 60 th Street, 726B, New York, NY

APPENDICES. Appendix I Business Ethical Framework

University of Kentucky College of Social Work Field Placement Student Self- Evaluation Form Community and Social Development (CSD) Concentration

Student Social Worker (End of Second Placement) Professional Capabilities Framework Evidence

VPS PRACTICUM STUDENT COMPETENCIES: SUPERVISOR EVALUATION VPS PRACTICUM STUDENT CLINICAL COMPETENCIES

THE WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. WMA STATEMENT ON ORGAN AND TISSUE DONATION

Guide to Learning Plan for Concentration Year MSW Field Placement. Adults and Families Advanced Practice Behaviors.

Department of Social Work Florida Gulf Coast University. Foundation Practice Field Placement Learning Plan

Model the social work role, set expectations for others and contribute to the public face of the organisation.

School of Social Work

SFHAI1 Use recognised theoretical models to provide therapeutic support to individuals who misuse substances

Core Competencies for Peer Workers in Behavioral Health Services

FOUNDATION YEAR FIELD PLACEMENT EVALUATION

Developing an ethical framework for One Health policy analysis: suggested first steps

Chaplains and Clinical Ethics Consultation: Roles, Skills, and Knowledge

St. Cloud Field Practicum Learning Contract

Welcoming Services and Service Coordination for Women with SUD and/or Co-occurring Disorders

PEER SUPPORT SERVICES PROVIDING UTILIZING A RECOVERY ORIENTED SYSTEM OF CARE (ROSC)

TITLE: Competency framework for school psychologists SCIS NO: ISBN: Department of Education, Western Australia, 2015

Research Ethics: A Brief Introduction. February 2017 Dina Shafey, Associate Director, ORE

The Profession of Social Work: At a Glance

Clinical Learning Contract

Content Outlines and KSAs Social Work Licensing Examinations

Part 1: Introduction & Overview

POLICY NAME: Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development STATUS: Recommended DATE OF REVIEW: September 2013

XAVIER UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK BSW DEGREE PROGRAM SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION ASSESSMENT PROJECT (SWEAP) EXIT SURVEY [2008 CSWE EPAS] BENCHMARK

PRACTICE STANDARDS TABLE. Learning Outcomes and Descriptive Indicators based on AASW Practice Standards, 2013

INTRODUCTION TO PEDIATRIC BIOETHICS IN PALLIATIVE CARE

MINT Incorporated Code of Ethics Adopted April 7, 2009, Ratified by the membership September 12, 2009

Ethical Caregiving What we Owe: The President s Council on Bioethics. William J. Kirkpatrick, LICSW

Advanced Competencies

Ethical Considerations and Multicultural Concerns in Caseload Management

WHAT IS CULTURAL COMPETENCE?

BSW SAMPLE LEARNING PLAN

Certified Peer Support Specialists TRAINING APPLICATION

Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development at The Grove Primary School

CODE OF CONDUCT PROTECTION AGAINST SEXUALIZED DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT AND VIOLENCE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR THE MAX PLANCK SOCIETY

Foundation Competencies CHILD WELFARE EPAS Core

PRACTICUM STUDENT SELF EVALUATION OF ADULT PRACTICUM COMPETENCIES Counseling Psychology Program at the University of Oregon.

Practitioner s Guide to Ethical Decision Making

The Ethics of Supported Decision Making. Jeffrey Miller, JD Policy Specialist Disability Rights Texas

1/11/2017. Program Objectives. Agenda. Ethics Learn, Understand then Practice: For Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants

SCDHSC0368 Present individuals preferences and needs

LEARNING PLAN. BSW LEARNING PLAN Western Illinois University

EPAS 2008 Accreditation Standards Core Competencies. EP2.1.1: Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.

Language Rights of Deaf Children

FLOATING SUPPORT SERVICE Service Description DONCASTER HOUSING FOR YOUNG PEOPLE

IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College

CORE COMPETENCIES IN FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY

Promoting Wellness as a Cultural Competency Framework to Address Diabetes Valerie Rochester, Director of Programs Black Women s Health Imperative

Mental Capacity Implementation Programme. Mental Capacity Act 2005

Guide to Learning Plan for Field Placement. Core Competencies

Spiritual, Moral, Social And Cultural Guidance: Approved by Governors: January Date of Review: January Non Statutory

The Atlantic Canada Association of Reflexology Therapists

Georgia Aging and Disability Resource Connection (ADRC) Evaluation Report

2. Definition of Research. 3. When Is Ethics Approval Required? 4. SAE EU Scholarship and Research Ethics Committee Membership. 4.2.

Pharmacists Defence Association Response to the General Pharmaceutical Council s Consultation on Religion, Personal Values and Beliefs

Ministry of Children and Youth Services. Independent Clinical Review Process for the Ontario Autism Program. Guidelines

Candidate and Facilitator Standards Policy

Information for Service Providers

CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Here4me Action for Children PROTOCOL FOR THE PROVISION OF ADVOCACY for West Berkshire

Where Small Voices Can Be Heard

Silberman School of Social Work. Practice Lab Feb. 7, 2013 C. Gelman, N. Giunta, S.J. Dodd

Promoting Excellence: A framework for all health and social services staff working with people with Dementia, their families and carers

Character Education Framework

Colorado Mental Wellness Network s Peer Support Specialist Training Overview

HealthCare Chaplaincy Network and The California State University Institute for Palliative Care and Palliative Care Chaplaincy Competencies

Sexual Assault. Attachment 1. Approval Date: Policy No.: The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

IDU Outreach Project. Program Guidelines

Gracemount High School Health and Wellbeing Policy

PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY. Declaration of Principles

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT MENTAL HEALTH ADVANCE DIRECTIVES GUIDE FOR CONSUMERS

Limited English Proficiency Training

Volunteers Code Of Conduct

Ethical Dilemmas in Victim Services

University of Ghana. Research Ethics Policy

Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development Policy

Victim Support and Title IX Investigations

ADVANCED CONCENTRATION YEAR FIELD LEARNING EVALUATION

Core Competencies Clinical Psychology A Guide

Women s Resource Center Advocacy Training What is an Advocate? What does Advocacy Mean?

College of Education. Rehabilitation Counseling

Universal Declaration of Ethical Principles for Psychologists

Marie Stopes International Informed Consent Guidelines for Research

Protection and resilience: A simple checklist for why, where and how to coordinate HIV and child protection policy and programming

REQUIRED INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) EDUCATIONAL READING FOR FLETCHER SCHOOL RESEARCHERS APPLYING FOR EXEMPTION FROM IRB

Equality and Human Rights Commission. Sexual harassment and the law: Guidance for employers

Information for Service Providers

Interprofessional Ethics and Team Approaches to Brain Injury Rehabilitation

Transcription:

1 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK ESTABLISHED LAST REVISED LAST REVIEWED June 2009 January 2016 June 2016 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK Revised January 2016

2 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK Brain Injury Services recognizes that ethical issues are often encountered by employees in the course of the work they perform. It is also recognized that a common framework to work through these issues is necessary to support employees in dealing with these complex issues. To address this need the agency, with the assistance of Hannah Kaufman, consulting bioethicist, and a committee of employees reviewed various ethical decision-making models that could be adapted to meet the needs of the agency. It was determined that the IDEA model, created by the Community Ethics Network, was the framework that was most suitable for the agency. 1 At the direction of the committee, with Ms. Kaufman s guidance, the IDEA model was modified to more appropriately suit the agency s environment and culture. ETHICAL PRACTICE The agency is committed to creating an environment in which employees are encouraged to openly consider and deliberate ethical issues. The following eleven principles are supported by the organization to assist employees in recognizing and considering ethical issues. Advocacy: Employees will help to improve the awareness, accessibility and quality of services by advocating on behalf of the individuals served. Autonomy: Clients have the basic right to self-determination, independence and freedom over their actions and what happens to their bodies. Capacity: Clients and decision makers fully understand their options and appreciate the consequences of the various choices being considered. Commitment to Quality Services: The highest quality service will be provided with the resources available. Employees will respect the role of other community agencies and work with them to maximise the effective delivery of services. Confidentiality: Clients and their decision makers will be informed of their right to consent to the sharing of necessary information. Employees will hold as confidential all information obtained in the course of their employment with Brain Injury Services. 1 Toronto Community Care Access Centre (CCAC). 2009. Community Ethics Toolkit. Toronto.http://www.utoronto.ca/jcb/ethics/documents/CEN_community_ethics_toolkit.pdf

3 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK Conflict of Interest: Employees will not compromise service to clients or responsibilities to the agency for personal benefit. Consent: Clients and decision makers freely authorize and agree to treatment with no coercion. Dignity: In all interactions employees will demonstrate respect for human dignity and will be responsive and sensitive to diversity. All client intervention will be least intrusive. Employee Safety: Employees will take necessary measures to ensure personal safety and will report and address all safety concerns in a supportive and non-threatening manner. Employees may withdraw themselves form a situation After all performance alternatives have been considered and their Safety is still deemed to be compromised. Justice: Service provision and the allocation of resources is distributed justly and according to need. Personal Inclusion: A holistic approach to the needs of clients will take into consideration all things important to them in their community, by treating people and groups fairly, by treating morally relevant cases alike, and by promoting fair relations among individuals and social groups. Discrimination based on income, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity or race, physical or mental ability, diverse behaviours, lifestyle or any other factor is not practiced.

4 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW The ethical decision making framework and worksheet can be used in various ways, including: When an employee is faced with an ethical issue During formal or informal case reviews For information sharing purposes. The decision making worksheet is designed to assist employees address complex and challenging issues in a comprehensive and logical manner. As required, the decision making worksheet can also be used to clarify the rationale for challenging decisions that were made. GUIDELINES FOR USING THE ETHICAL DECISION MAKING WORKSHEET 1. Identify the facts 2. Determine the ethical principle 3. Explore the options 4. Act on the decision and evaluate Step 1: Identify the facts State the presenting issue, identify and gather the facts of the situation. Using the four box format, gather relevant information regarding Clinical Indications, Client Preferences, Quality of Life and Contextual Features. Take into account all of the relevant considerations and stakeholders. When considering the facts reflect on your own emotions, feelings and values to help understand how they may influence how you respond to a particular situation. Be aware of such emotions/values/biases and act accordingly (e.g. if objectivity is not possible, remove yourself from the situation and ask a peer/manager to become involved). In addition to considering your own thoughts, emotions and cultural traditions, explore those of the client and other relevant stakeholders (family, caregiver, etc.).

5 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK Use the worksheet to make notes. The worksheet is not meant to be an official document. Document the results in meeting minutes, case notes, summary notes, etc. as appropriate. Step 2: Determine the ethical principle(s) Identify the ethical principle(s) that are relevant in the situation and determine if any of these are in conflict with each other. This will assist to clarify and articulate the issues. You may determine that this is not an ethical issue; however, the decision making framework can still be applied to assist with resolution of the issue. Use the worksheet to make notes. Step 3: Explore options Explore options. Consider the strengths, weaknesses and possible outcomes of each one. Brainstorm and be creative in your thinking. The chosen option may not necessarily be the one that has the most strengths or least weaknesses; rather each option should be considered on the overall importance of its related principles, strengths and weaknesses. Use the worksheet to make notes. Step 4: Act on your decision and evaluate Develop an action plan and document it. Determine how the plan is to be communicated to the client and relevant stakeholders to maximize understanding. Ongoing communication with the client is critical. The plan must be documented in meeting minutes, case notes, summary notes, etc. as appropriate. Evaluate the plan after implementation. Consider if the intended results were obtained or if additional follow up and/or action is required. Document evaluations and communications as required. Evaluate your decision. Reflect on the decision making process and your feelings with respect to the situation.

6 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK REFERENCES 1. Jonson, AR, Siegler, M, and Winsdale, W, (2002) Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine (5 th edition) New York McGraw Hill. 2. Kyle Anstey, Shane Green, Sue MacRae, Deb Pape, Barbara Russell, Barbara Secker, Frank Wagner, and Shawn Winsor. Core Curriculum Working Group 2 of the Clinical, Organizational and Research Ethics (CORE) Network (formerly the Clinical Ethics Group), University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics (JCB) 3. Toronto Community Care Access Centre (CCAC). 2009. Community Ethics Toolkit. Toronto. http://www.utoronto.ca/jcb/ethics/documents/cen_community_ ethics_toolkit.pdf 2 Members, in alphabetical order, include Kyle Anstey, Shane Green, Sue MacRae, Deb Pape, Barbara Russell, Barbara Secker, Frank Wagner, and Shawn Winsor.

7 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING WORKSHEET (SAMPLE) I Identify the facts D Determine the ethical principles E Explore the options A Act on your decision and evaluate What are the presenting concerns? Step 1: Identify the Facts Clinical Indications: State the client s clinical issues, history and diagnosis. Is this an emergency or crisis? Are there other relevant medical conditions, seizure disorder to consider, etc,? Describe clinical issues relevant to the present concern. Are there rehabilitation goals relevant to this issue? Are there plans in case of therapeutic failure? Client Preferences: State the client s preferences. Are they relevant to the current situation? What are the client s values? Does the client have capacity to decide in this situation? Is the client/dm making an informed, voluntary decision? Quality of Life: Describe quality of life as perceived by the client. Examine the emotional factors influencing each individual involved in the situation. Consider your own feelings, values, biases and prior experience. Contextual Features: Are there any family involved or other significant relationships? Are any care plans put in place so far? Are there relevant social, legal, economic and agency circumstances? What other relevant features (e.g. religious & cultural factors, limits on confidentiality, resource allocation issues, legal implications, research or teaching involved and provider conflict of interest) need to be considered?

8 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING WORKSHEET (SAMPLE) Step #2- Determine the relevant Ethical Principles ( ) Advocacy ( ) Consent ( ) Autonomy ( ) Dignity ( ) Capacity ( ) Employee Safety ( ) Confidentiality ( ) Justice ( ) Commitment to Quality Service ( ) Personal Inclusion ( ) Conflict of Interest ( ) Other Principle Explain the issue

9 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING WORKSHEET (SAMPLE) Step# 3 Explore Options Explore options and consider the strengths and weaknesses and possible outcomes of each. Brainstorm, be creative, consider a compromise. Imagine the short-term and longterm foreseeable consequences and outcomes for each option. Considerations: Do the options fit with the client s values Do the options meet agency policies, directives and regulations What principles guide your decisions Can there be delayed or non intervention Are necessary resources available What are the client s rights, feelings and wants What is in the client s best interest Are your conscience and emotional reactions influencing your decisions What is the impact on other professionals and the agency as a whole. Document and discuss with your supervisor as appropriate. Options Strengths Weaknesses

10 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING WORKSHEET (SAMPLE) Step #4 Act on your Decision and Evaluate Develop an Action Plan: Given the information you have, choose the best option and develop an action plan. If the client is not capable is the DM making the decision in accordance with the client s prior wishes or client s best interests? Are the client s rights being respected? Is there any reason why the client s preferences may not be followed? Present your suggested option and action plan to the client and those involved. Refine the plan based on additional information. Identify how to best implement the option. If the client or decision maker does not consent to the plan, repeat Steps 1, 2 & 3. Determine when and how to evaluate, document and communicate the plan, using case notes and other relevant communication tools. Evaluate the plan: Use your problem solving and critical thinking skills. What was the outcome of the plan? Are changes necessary? Follow Steps 1,2 &,3 as indicated if other factors come to light or if the situation changes. Debrief with client/dm/supervisor. Identify learning opportunities for employees. Document the evaluation in the client file as a case note. Evaluate your decision: How do you and/or team feel about the decision and outcome? What would you do differently and what would you do the same next time? What have you learned about yourself? What have you learned about the decision making process? Debrief with supervisor if necessary. When the issue is resolved, shred worksheet. Document appropriately in client file.

11 ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK www.braininjuryservices.com 225 King William Street, Suite 508 Hamilton, ON L8R 1B1 Bus: 905.523.8852 Fax: 905.523.8211