Interested in conducting your own webinar?

Similar documents
Automated Sample Preparation for FAME Analysis in Edible Oils Using an Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench

Improving the Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters Using Automated Sample Preparation Techniques

Column Selection for the Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters Application

AS Application Note 1602

Highly Reproducible Detailed cis/trans FAMEs Analysis Ensured by New Optimized Rt-2560 Column Manufacturing and Application-Specific QC Test

DETERMINATION OF FATTY ACIDS IN EDIBLE OILS BY CAPILARY GC

Fatty acid profile analysis: Grape Seed Oil Sample Set Two ( )

Rapid Analysis of 37 FAMEs with the Agilent 8860 Gas Chromatograph

Analysis of FAMEs Using Cold EI GC/MS for Enhanced Molecular Ion Selectivity

Automated Sample Preparation for Profiling Fatty Acids in Blood and Plasma using the Agilent 7693 ALS

Determination of red blood cell fatty acid profiles in clinical research

Separation of 37 Fatty Acid Methyl Esters Utilizing a High-Efficiency 10 m Capillary GC Column with Optimization in Three Carrier Gases

Determination of Adulterants in Olive Oil Analysis of Waxes and Fatty Acid Methyl and Ethyl Esters with Capillary GC and Agilent OpenLAB Software

using the Agilent 7696A Sample Prep

Analysis of the fatty acids from Periploca sepium by GC-MS and GC-FID

Automated Analysis and Quantitation of Fish Oil Supplements using the MIDI Sherlock Marine Oil Analysis Package

Improving the Analysis of 37 Fatty Acid Methyl Esters

Analyze Dietary Fatty Acids, Sterols, and Lignans with an Agilent J&W DB-5ms UI Column

Analysis of Organic Acids and Alcohols Using the Agilent J&W DB-624UI Ultra Inert GC Column

AppNote 3/2013. Automated Determination of Total Fat, Saturated Fat, Monounsaturated Fat and Trans Fat Content in Food Samples KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

NEW! 200 m GC Columns for Detailed Analysis of cis/trans FAME Isomers

Modified QuEChERS Procedure for Analysis of Bisphenol A in Canned Food Products

Fatty Acid Mass Spectrometry Protocol Updated 10/11/2007 By Daren Stephens

FAMEs Analyses High-Resolution GC Analyses of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters

A MODIFICATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF FATTY ACID COMPOSITION OF MILK FAT

INTERNATIONAL OLIVE COUNCIL

Analysis of Omega 3 and Omega 6 FAMEs in Fish Oil and Animal Fat Using an Agilent J&W DB-FATWAX Ultra Inert GC Column

Trans Fat Determination in the Industrially Processed Edible Oils By Transmission FT-IR Spectroscopy By

Rapid and Robust Detection of THC and Its Metabolites in Blood

AOAC Official Method Determination of Labeled Fatty Acids Content in Milk Products and Infant Formula

FATTY ACIDS IN PLASMA BY GC/MS - Code GC75010

Rapid Separation of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters

Analysis of Acrylamide in French Fries using Agilent Bond Elut QuEChERS AOAC kit and LC/MS/MS

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on Multivariate Data of Lard Analysis in Cooking Oil

High-Resolution GC Analyses of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAMEs)

A Rapid Method for Trans-Fatty Acid Determination Using a Single Capillary GC Seiichi Shirasawa, Akiko Sasaki, Yasue Saida and Chiemi Satoh

A comparison study of the analysis of volatile organic acids and fatty acids

Supplementary information on testing by participating laboratories:

KEYWORDS ABSTRACT. 3-MCPD, Glycidol, edible oil, lab automation, ISO , AOCS Cd 29c-13, DGF C-VI 18 (10)

Lutein Esters from Tagetes Erecta

Jack C. Cappozzo Separation Science Webinar March 12, 2013

New GCMS Applications

Fatty Acid Methylation Kits

THE EFFECT OF REFINING STEP ON THE CHANGES IN VISCOSITY VALUES OF VEGETABLE OILS

The Development of Analytical Method for the Determination of Azelaic Acid Content in Cosmetic Cream Products

Application Note. Authors. Abstract. Petrochemical

The challenging extraction of non-polar contaminants out of a non-polar vegetable oil sample

Fast determination of residual glycerol and glycerides in biodiesel by SFC/MS using the Agilent 1260 Infinity Analytical SFC System

Highly Repeatable Ultra Low Detection of Estradiol Using Triple Quadrupole GC/MS in NCI Mode

Analysis of short chain organic acids in tobacco and in some flavored e-liquids

Forensic Chemistry: Differentiation of Olive Oil and Sunflower Oil by GCxGC-TOFMS and Determination of Fraudulent Material.

Independent Column Temperature Control Using an LTM Oven Module for Improved Multidimensional Separation of Chiral Compounds

DETERMINATION OF COMPOSITION OF TRIACYLGLYCEROLS AND COMPOSITION AND CONTENT OF DI-ACYLGLYCEROLS BY CAPILLARY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY, IN VEGETABLE OILS

Determination of Gamma-Hydroxy-Butyrate (GHB) in Biological Samples

High Throughput Extraction of Opiates from Urine and Analysis by GC/MS or LC/MS/MS)

Ultrafast analysis of synthetic antioxidants in vegetable oils using the Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system

Direct Methylation of Lipids in Foods by Alkali Hydrolysis

Zillillah, a Guowei Tan, a,b and Zhi Li* a,b. 4 Engineering Drive 4, Singapore Fax: ; Tel:

Metabolite and Fatty Acid Analysis of Yeast Cells and Culture Supernatants Liwei Chen and Wei Ning Chen *

Rapid Analysis of Water-Soluble Vitamins in Infant Formula by Standard-Addition

Detection of Cannabinoids in Oral Fluid with the Agilent 7010 GC-MS/MS System

Trans FAT LABELING an Industry Perspective

INTERNATIONAL OLIVE COUNCIL

3-Acetyldeoxynivalenol. 15-Acetyldeoxynivalenol

Evaluation of biological value of sprouts I. Fat content, fatty acid composition

Chromatography Vacuum Ultraviolet Spectroscopy

Analysis of several common. organic acids in tobacco leaf, snus, and moist snuff

A Robustness Study for the Agilent 6470 LC-MS/MS Mass Spectrometer

Forensic Analysis of Blood Alcohol Concentration

Application Note No. 301/2017

Modified QuEChERS for HILIC LC/MS/MS Analysis of Nicotine and Its Metabolites in Fish

Successive optimisation of waste cooking oil transesterification in a continuous microwave assisted reactor

Quantitative Determination of Terpenes in Cannabis Using Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction and GC/MS

MALAYSIAN MALAYSIAN COCOA WORKSHOP ON THE SAFE USE OF PESTICIDES IN COCOA AND HARMONIZED

Determination of Bath Salts (Pyrovalerone Analogs) in Biological Samples

ZB-FAME The Fast FAME GC Column

Innovations in Large Volume Injection

GLOBAL METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF EXTRANEOUS OILS IN OLIVE OILS

VOLUNTARY MONOGRAPH. Council for Responsible Nutrition March 2006

NUTRITIONAL COMPONENTS OF SUPERCRITICAL CARBON DIOXIDE EXTRACTED WHEAT GERM OIL

Analysis of Food Sugars in Various Matrices Using UPLC with Refractive Index (RI) Detection

Comprehensive analysis of FAMEs, fatty acids, and triglycerides. Agilent J&W GC columns for food nutrition testing

Improved Analysis of Fatty Acids by Capillary GC columns based on Ionic Liquids F. Michel, L.M. Sidisky, M.D. Buchanan, G.A. Baney, Y. Ni,J.L.

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

DET REPORT NO. 69 JUNE 2015

AppNote 3/2008. Determination of Aldehydes and Ketones in Oily Matrices using a Novel Dynamic Headspace Sampler Coupled to GC/MS INTRODUCTION

Sucrose Esters of Fatty Acids

Analyze Drugs of Abuse with Agilent J&W Ultimate Plus Tubing in an Inert Flow Path

CORESTA Recommended Method No. 84

High-Resolution Analysis of Intact Triglycerides by Reversed Phase HPLC Using the Agilent 1290 Infinity LC UHPLC System

Application Note. Agilent Application Solution Analysis of ascorbic acid, citric acid and benzoic acid in orange juice. Author. Abstract.

Methods and Materials

Determination of Allergens in Fragrance Products Using Agilent Deconvolution Reporting Software Application Brief

METHOD FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE COHERENCE OF TAG COMPOSITION WITH THE FATTY ACID COMPOSITION

Determination of Olive Oil Adulteration by Principal Component Analysis with HPLC Charged Aerosol Detector Data

Blood Alcohol Determination with Teledyne Tekmar HT3 Automated Static/Dynamic Headspace Analyzer Application Note Introduction

Direct Analysis of Lipophilic Antioxidants of Olive Oils using Bicontinuous Microemulsions

Certificate of Analysis Standard Reference Material 3275

Extraction of 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol from Hydrolyzed Urine by ISOLUTE. SLE+ Prior to GC/MS Analysis

Transcription:

Interested in conducting your own webinar? Email webinars@bnpmedia.com

An Automated System for the analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in edible oils Institute for Food Safety and Health Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL

Archive www.foodsafetysummit.com Add to your favorites

An Automated System for the analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in edible oils Institute for Food Safety and Health Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL

Outline GC/MS and GC/FID method WorkBench and manual sample preparation methodology Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench method validation Analysis of EVOO and adulterated EVOO Conclusion

Triglyceride 1 fat/3 fatty acid chains Glycerol Backbone Derivatization with Boron Trifluoride in methanol Product: 3 fatty acid methyl esters

Analysis AOAC 996.06 AOCS Ce 1h-05 Acid Hydrolysis of Sample Matrix (Mojonnier Fat Method) Esterification with methanol to form Fatty Acid Methyl Esters GC

Esterification

GC

Instrumentation and Analytical Conditions for the GC/MS system GC chromatograph Agilent 6890A Series Column: HP-88, 60m x 250mm x 0.25 µm (p/n 112-8867) GC Inlet: 250 C, Split ratio 100 : 1 Carrier gas: Oven temperature program: Helium, constant flow mode, 1 ml/min 140 C (5 min), 4 C/min to 240 C (0 min) Injection volume: 1 µl Mass selective detector: 5973 MSD Transfer line: 280 C Solvent delay: Acquisition mode: 4 min Scan (40-500 amu) Liner: Split liner, tapered, deactivated (p/n 5183-4711)

Instrumentation and Analytical Conditions for the GC/FID system GC chromatograph Agilent 6890A Series Column: HP-88, 60m x 250mm x 0.25 µm (p/n 112-8867) GC Inlet: 250 C, Split ratio 60:1 Carrier gas: Oven temperature program: Helium, constant flow mode, 1.3 ml/min 140 C (5 min), 4 C/min to 240 C (0 min) Injection volume: 1 µl Detector: FID @300 C Transfer line: 280 C Liner: Split liner, tapered, deactivated (p/n 5183-4711)

Preparation Of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters with an Acid Catalyzed Reaction Manually 50 mg sample in 15 ml centrifuge tube Add 2 ml of 2N NaOH in methanol Heat 80ºC for 1 hour; Allow to cool Add 2 ml of 25% BF3 in methanol Heat 80ºC for 1 hour; Allow to cool Add 5 ml of water and 5 ml of hexane Shake well Allow the phase to separate or centrifuge Transfer supernatant to GC autosampler vial

Developing a method for WorkBench Calibration curve standards Validate the automated method Convert manual AOAC method to WorkBench reduced volumes Verify WorkBench method gives the same results as a manual method Test samples with an acid catalyzed reaction: EVOO from Spain, Italy, Greece, and California Refined olive oils Seed oil (grapeseed, sunflower, corn, canola, and vegetable)

Calibration Curve Standard Preparation on WorkBench GLC Reference STD 603 (from NU-CHEK PREP, INK.) ISTD - Methyl Undecanoate (from NU-CHEK PREP, INK.) Six level calibration curve (0.001-0.1mg/ml, 0.040-40mg/ml depending on the specific FAME concentration ) Linear dilutions in 500µL of hexane Complete in 40 minutes Excellent linearity (Avg R²=0.999)

Work Bench

Calibration Curve Standard Preparation on WorkBench method

Instrument Calibration Data for FAME standards prepared with the Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench # FAME name Chain R² 1 Methyl Myristate C14:0 0.9994 2 Methyl Palmitate C16:0 0.9992 3 Methyl Palmitoleate C16:1 0.9991 4 Methyl Heptadecanoate C17:0 0.9997 5 Methyl Stearate C18:0 0.9996 6 Methyl Oleate C18:1 1.0000 7 Methyl Vaccenate C18:1 0.9987 8 Methyl Linoleate C18:2 0.9994 9 Methyl Arachidate C20:0 0.9997 10 Methyl Linolenate C18:3 0.9994 11 Methyl 11-Eicosenoate C20:1 0.9989 12 Methyl Behenate C22:0 0.9997 13 Methyl Lignocerate C24:0 0.9999

Instrument Calibration Data for FAME standards prepared manually # FAME name Chain R² 1 Methyl Myristate C14:0 0.9919 2 Methyl Palmitate C16:0 0.9901 3 Methyl Palmitoleate C16:1 0.9943 4 Methyl Heptadecanoate C17:0 0.9989 5 Methyl Stearate C18:0 0.9906 6 Methyl Oleate C18:1 0.9912 7 Methyl Vaccenate C18:1 0.9961 8 Methyl Linoleate C18:2 0.9957 9 Methyl Arachidate C20:0 0.9969 10 Methyl Linolenate C18:3 0.9970 11 Methyl 11-Eicosenoate C20:1 0.9976 12 Methyl Behenate C22:0 0.9997 13 Methyl Lignocerate C24:0 0.9989

Calibration curves for FAME standards prepared with the Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench

Edible oil Sample Preparation on the WorkBench Add 10 µl of oil sample Add 3.3 µl of internal standard Add 120 µl of 2N NaOH in methanol Mix 20 s at 1500 rpm Heat at 70ºC for 5min, cool 5 min Add 240 µl of 12.5% BF3 in methanol Mix 20 s at 1500rpm Heat at 70ºC for 5 min, cool 5 min Add 300 µl of water Add 300 µl of hexane Mix 20 s at 1500 rpm Transfer top layer (of 300 µl) to a new GC vial

Edible oil Sample Preparation on the WorkBench

WorkBench Method Validation Three edible oils (refined olive oil, Spanish EVOO, and California EVOO) were prepared manually and by WorkBench and analyzed on different days %RSD values for 6 samples were very similar to the manual sample preparation %RSD Generally recoveries were greater in the WorkBench prepared samples WorkBench made samples are as good as manually prepared samples WorkBench used 17 times less solvents and reagents

Free Fatty Acid results comparison using manual and automated sample preparation method RT (min) Chain Name Conversio n Factor (Fa) FA (mg/ml) in Spanish EVOO (#S6_L1) Manual n = 6 WorkBench n = 6 FA (mg/ml) in California EVOO (#CA1_L1) Manual n = 6 WorkBench n = 6 FA (mg/ml) in Olive oil (# O3_L1) Manual n = 6 WorkBench n = 6 14.985 C16:0 Methyl Palmitate 0.9482 109.36 109.52 103.35 104.78 82.34 97.35 STDEV 3.53 3.54 2.94 4.40 0.71 2.13 %RSD 3.23 3.23 2.84 4.20 0.87 2.19 15.994 C16:1 Methyl Palmitoleate 0.9478 5.53 5.53 3.95 4.74 2.84 3.79 STDEV 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 %RSD 7.00 7.00 9.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.333 C18:0 Methyl Stearate 0.9531 18.11 17.31 17.31 17.63 22.87 28.12 STDEV 0.60 0.72 0.72 0.80 0.00 0.52 %RSD 3.33 4.14 4.14 4.52 0.00 1.86 19.182 C18:1 Methyl Oleate 0.9528 592.64 584.45 568.82 563.26 600.58 671.72 STDEV 15.60 19.22 14.09 26.65 4.46 9.00 %RSD 2.63 3.29 2.48 4.73 0.74 1.34 19.192 C18:1 Methyl Vaccenate 0.9528 20.17 20.17 17.94 18.26 17.31 19.06 STDEV 0.72 0.72 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 %RSD 3.56 3.56 2.17 2.13 2.25 0.00 19.826 C18:2 Methyl Linoleate 0.9525 21.91 22.07 45.56 45.56 43.34 49.37 STDEV 0.60 0.72 1.11 1.53 0.52 1.27 %RSD 2.75 3.25 2.44 3.35 1.20 2.56 21.467 C20:0 Methyl Arachidate 0.9571 1.91 1.91 1.91 2.87 1.91 2.87 STDEV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %RSD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.964 C18:3 Methyl Linolenate 0.9521 4.92 4.92 4.13 4.44 3.81 4.13 STDEV 0.39 0.39 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.49 %RSD 7.90 7.90 11.92 11.07 0.00 11.92 22.273 C20:1 Methyl 11-Eicosenoate 0.9569 1.91 1.91 1.91 2.87 1.91 1.91 STDEV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %RSD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Comparison of Free Fatty Acids using manual and automated sample preparation methods in Spanish EVOO

Comparison of Free Fatty Acids using manual and automated sample preparation methods in Olive Oil

GC/MS and GC/FID chromatogram comparison

FAME standard chromatograms MSD MSD FID FID

% FA in Spanish EVOO and adulterated EVOO with corn oil Chain Name S1_L1-1 S2_L1 S3_L1 S4_L1 S4_L2 S6_L1 S5_L1 S5_L1 spk w/10% corn oil S5_L1 spk w/25% corn oil S5_L1 spk w/50% corn oil Allowable FA Ranges % for EVOO C14:0 Methyl Myristate 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C16:0 Methyl Palmitate 13.85 12.47 10.02 11.73 11.48 14.05 18.85 18.91 18.05 16.67 7.5-20 C16:1 Methyl Palmitoleate 1.15 1.07 0.57 0.76 0.69 0.71 1.45 1.29 1.03 0.66 0.3-3.5 C17:0 Methyl Heptadecanoate 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 C18:0 Methyl Stearate 3.03 3.16 3.38 3.20 3.64 2.33 1.50 1.68 1.67 1.60 0.5-5 C18:1 Methyl Oleate 70.31 74.48 75.82 73.27 73.04 76.14 60.40 56.84 52.53 45.74 55.0-83.0 C18:1 Methyl Vaccenate 2.57 2.61 1.82 2.13 1.99 2.59 3.81 3.45 2.99 2.19 C18:2 Methyl Linoleate 7.28 4.39 6.44 6.93 7.01 2.81 12.59 16.44 22.27 31.54 3.5-21.0 C20:0 Methyl Arachidate 0.36 0.33 0.34 0.36 0.40 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.27 <0.6 C18:3 Methyl Linolenate 0.79 0.77 0.82 0.82 0.92 0.63 0.51 0.51 0.54 0.66 <1.0 C20:1 Methyl 11-Eicosenoate 0.32 0.29 0.34 0.34 0.36 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.27 <0.4 C22:0 Methyl Behenate 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 C24:0 Methyl Lignocerate 0.00 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Fatty Acid distribution of spiked Spanish EVOO with corn oil 70.0 60.0 Spanish EVOO 50.0 40.0 30.0 Spanish EVOO spk w/10% corn Spanish EVOO spk w/25% corn 20.0 10.0 Spanish EVOO spk w/50% corn corn oil 0.0 C14:0 C16:0 C16:1 C17:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:1 C18:2 C20:0 C18:3 C20:1 C22:0 C24:0

C14:0 C16:0 C16:1 C17:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:1 C18:2 C20:0 C18:3 C20:1 C22:0 C24:0 Fatty Acid distribution of spiked Greek EVOO with corn oil 78.000 68.000 Greek EVOO 58.000 48.000 Greek EVOO spk w/10% corn oil 38.000 28.000 18.000 Greek EVOO spk w/25% corn oil Greek EVOO spk w/50% corn oil 8.000 Corn oil -2.000

C14:0 C16:0 C16:1 C17:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:1 C18:2 C20:0 C18:3 C20:1 C22:0 C24:0 Fatty Acid distribution of spiked Italian EVOO with corn oil 70.000 Italian EVOO 60.000 50.000 Italian EVOO spk w/10% corn oil 40.000 30.000 Italian EVOO spk w/25% corn oil 20.000 Italian EVOO spk w/50% corn oil 10.000 Corn oil 0.000

C14:0 C16:0 C16:1 C17:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:1 C18:2 C20:0 C18:3 C20:1 C22:0 C24:0 Fatty Acid distribution of spiked Spanish EVOO with vegetable oil 62.0 Spanish EVOO 52.0 42.0 32.0 22.0 12.0 Spanish EVOO spk w/10% vegetable oil Spanish EVOO spk w/25% vegetable oil Spanish EVOO spk w/50% vegetable oil Vegetable oil 2.0-8.0

C14:0 C16:0 C16:1 C17:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:1 C18:2 C20:0 C18:3 C20:1 C22:0 C24:0 Fatty Acid distribution of spiked Greek EVOO with vegetable oil 77.000 67.000 57.000 Greek EVOO 47.000 37.000 27.000 17.000 Greek EVOO spk w/10% vegetable oil Greek EVOO spk w/25% vegetable oil Greek EVOO spk w/50% vegetable oil Vegetable oil 7.000-3.000

C14:0 C16:0 C16:1 C17:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:1 C18:2 C20:0 C18:3 C20:1 C22:0 C24:0 Fatty Acid distribution of spiked Italian EVOO with vegetable oil 69.000 Italian EVOO 59.000 49.000 Italian EVOO spk w/10% vegetable oil 39.000 Italian EVOO spk w/25% vegetable oil 29.000 Italian EVOO spk w/50% vegetable oil 19.000 Vegetable oil 9.000-1.000

C14:0 C16:0 C16:1 C17:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:1 C18:2 C20:0 C18:3 C20:1 C22:0 C24:0 Fatty Acid distribution of spiked Spanish EVOO with grapeseed oil 62.0 Spanish EVOO 52.0 42.0 Spanish EVOO spk w/10 grapeseed oil 32.0 22.0 Spanish EVOO spk w/25 grapeseed oil 12.0 Spanish EVOO spk w/50 grapeseed oil 2.0-8.0 Grapeseed oil

C14:0 C16:0 C16:1 C17:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:1 C18:2 C20:0 C18:3 C20:1 C22:0 C24:0 77.000 Fatty Acid distribution of spiked Greek EVOO with grapeseed oil 67.000 57.000 Greek EVOO 47.000 37.000 Greek EVOO spk w/10% grapeseed oil 27.000 Greek EVOO spk w/25% grapeseed oil 17.000 Greek EVOO spk w/50% grapeseed oil 7.000 Grapeseed oil -3.000

C14:0 C16:0 C16:1 C17:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:1 C18:2 C20:0 C18:3 C20:1 C22:0 C24:0 Fatty Acid distribution of spiked Italian 69.000 EVOO with grapeseed oil 59.000 Italian EVOO 49.000 Italian EVOO spk w/10% grapeseed oil 39.000 29.000 Italian EVOO spk w/25% grapeseed oil 19.000 Italian EVOO spk w/50% grapeseed oil 9.000 grapeseed oil -1.000

Greek, Italian and Spanish EVOO adulterated with Grapeseed oil PCA Factor Variance Analysis

Factor 5 (1.4%) Factor 4 (2.3%) Factor 3 (18.6%) Factor 2 (32.3%) Italian, Spanish, and Greek EVOO spiked with grapeseed oil Factor 1 (42.6%) Factor 2 (32.3%) Factor 3 (18.6%) Factor 4 (2.3%)

Factor 2 (32.3%) Italian, Spanish, and Greek EVOO spiked with grapeseed oil (cont.) 6 Italian EVOO 2 Spanish EVOO Grapeseed oil -2 Greek EVOO EVOO spk. w/50% grapeseed oil EVOO spk. w/10% grapeseed oil EVOO spk. w/25% grapeseed oil -5 0 5 Factor 1 (42.6%)

Response Spanish EVOO spiked with corn oil at 10%, 25%, and 50% Full Data 400 200 0 14.985000 15.994000 18.333000 19.182000 19.192000 19.826000 21.467000 21.964000 22.273000 Time (min) Full data line plot view adulterated Spanish EVOO with corn oil

PCA Scores plot of Spanish EVOO adulterated with corn oil (10%, 25% and 50%) corn oil Spanish EVOO

Factor 2 (26.0%) Italian EVOO spiked with vegetable oil 4 2 Vegetable oil Italian EVOO 0-2 Italian EVOO spk. w/ 50% vegetable oil Italian EVOO spk w/ 10% vegetable oil -4 Italian EVOO spk w/ 25% vegetable oil -8-4 0 4 8 Factor 1 (70.2%) PCA Scores, all samples model, no cross validation

Factor 2 (27.1%) Edible oils distribution California EVOO Canola oil 2 Spain EVOO -2 Edible oils distribution Color code: Italian EVOO Spanish EVOO Greek EVOO Corn oil California EVOO Vegetable oil Processed OO Sunflower oil Grapeseed oil -6-5 0 5 10 Factor 1 (37.3%) Factor 1 v Factor 2 Scores

Factor 5 (4.7%) Factor 4 (7.6%) Factor 3 (14.1%) Factor 2 (27.1%) Edible oils distribution (cont.) Factor 1 (37.3%) Factor 2 (27.1%) Factor 3 (14.1%) Factor 4 (7.6%) Scores Plots, factors 1 through 5

Conclusions The Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench, derivatization reactions were easily converted to automated method Samples prepared with WorkBench are reproducible compared to manual preparation Calibration standard preparation is fast and yields excellent results (r 2 ) WorkBench used 17 times less solvents and reagents This study demonstrates an efficient and economical GC/MS /FID method for determination of fatty acids in edible oils