draft Big Five 03/13/ HFM

Similar documents
JOE BLOGGS 22 Mar 2017 Character DNA SAMPLE REPORT

THE INTEGRITY PROFILING SYSTEM

Anders Platon. Year of birth: Assessment date:

The Doctrine of Traits. Lecture 29

Comparison Report For Kathryn Petersen Working with Martin Gilmore

The bars represent the strength of preference of the candidate for the given scale.

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE TEST-R

Learning Styles Questionnaire

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The Attentional and Interpersonal Style (TAIS) Inventory: Measuring the Building Blocks of Performance

Personality: Definitions

Personal Listening Profile Facilitator Report

Giotto Narrative Interpretation. Sample Report. name: date:

Development. summary. Sam Sample. Emotional Intelligence Profile. Wednesday 5 April 2017 General Working Population (sample size 1634) Sam Sample

Mastering Emotions. 1. Physiology

5 Quick Tips for Improving Your Emotional Intelligence. and Increasing Your Success in All Areas of Your Life

USING ASSERTIVENESS TO COMMUNICATE ABOUT SEX

STANDARD OCCUPATIONAL PERSONALITY REPORT COMPARISON GROUP: MANAGERIAL & PROFESSIONAL

THE 5-MINUTE PERSONALITY TEST L O G B

Factor Insights. Predictive Index, LLC

Insight Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI)

Evelyn NEO-PI-R (W - 39;9 Years) NEO-PI-R - Standard. Page 1 of 18 Test of :09. Name of respondent: Evelyn NEO-PI-R

WALES Personal and Social Education Curriculum Audit. Key Stage 2: SEAL Mapping to PSE outcomes

NEO PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT FOR MANAGEMENT PLANNING

Working with Clients with Personality Disorders. Core Issues of All Personality Disorders. High Conflict Personality Disorders

What is Stress? What Causes Stress?

Altar Working Systems and Strategies. Pastor: Ball

Personality Perspectives. Do You Really Know Who You Are Supervising?

The Power Of Self-Belief

NORTH LONDON SCHOOL OF ENGLISH. Title: Personality. Read the text and fill in the gaps with the words from the box.

S.A.F.E.T.Y. TM Profile for Joe Bloggs. Joe Bloggs. Apr / 13

TRACOM Sneak Peek Excerpts from. Self-Perception Guide

Overcome your need for acceptance & approval of others

Profile of David BERNARD Page 2 / 15

SAFETY QUOTIENT. EMPLOYER REPORT For Hiring, Training & Coaching. June 20, Kelly Sample

Client Care Counseling Critique Assignment Osteoporosis

BIRKMAN REPORT THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR: JOHN Q. PUBLIC (D00112) ANDREW DEMO (G526VC) DATE PRINTED February

Lidia Smirnov Counselling

CAN T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?

SUBSCALE DEFINITION LOW SCORE HIGH SCORE. Good Attachment Good relationships with others Hostile toward authority Positive attitude toward authority

Depression. Most of the time, people manage to deal with these feelings and get past them with a little time and care.

Emotion- & Action-focused Coping in Sport

Communication Tools. Paul Deslauriers

Lesson 12. Understanding and Managing Individual Behavior

MENTAL TOUGHNESS. Steve Oakes

Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (EIQ16)

TRAITS APPROACH. Haslinda Sutan Ahmad Nawi. Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology Universiti Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia

DISC Profile Report. Alex Engineer. Phone: or

BEHAVIORAL DIFFERENCES TIP SHEET Karlene Belyea, MBA

Section 1: Goals and Attitudes

Depression: what you should know

11. A Thumbnail Sketch of the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory (MBTI) Page 1 of 24

John Smith 19 Sep Full Circle Profile

THE GENERAL WELL-BEING SCHEDULE SEX: M: [ ] F: [ ] AGE: 1. How have you been feeling in general during the past month?

Chapter 3 Mental & Emotional Health

Project: Date: Presented by: Siegel HR

OPQ Profile OPQ. Candidate Plus Report. Name Mr. Sample Candidate. Date 29 January

MTQ48. Developing individuals and the organisation

Name: GLC2O Mr. Barter

Discovering Diversity Profile Individual Report

The following is a brief summary of the main points of the book.

Favorite world: Do you prefer to focus on the outer world or on your own inner world? This is called Extraversion (E) or Introversion (I).

Methodology Introduction of the study Statement of Problem Objective Hypothesis Method

Slide

Top-50 Mental Gym Workouts

Loving-Kindness Meditation

Understanding myself and others. Evaluation questions

SCHOOLPLACE. Trait Report BIG FIVE PROFILE. A Customized Report for: Sample Person. Date: 06/20/2017. Pierce J. Howard, PhD Jane Mitchell Howard, MBA

Introduction to SOCIAL STYLE sm

DiSC PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT

giotto Identifying Integrity name: Sample Person date:

Elimination of Implicit Bias By Adapting to Various Personalities

5 Minute Strategies to Support Healthy Treatment and Recovery

Twenty-Two Proven Tips for Enhancing your Love Life

COMPARISON REPORT. Working with Alex Bradley. Thursday, April 07, This report is provided by:

Common Measurement Framework: Possible Front Runner Measures

Improving Personal Effectiveness With Versatility

People. Overcoming Negativity in the workplace. Positive VS Negative. Habits of Negative People. They... Habits of Positive People

Interpersonal skills are defined as everyday skills employed for. communication and interaction with individuals. These skills include all

Matters. Assessment & Development. Vol. 1 No. 3. Autumn 2009 ISSN Official Publication of The Psychological Testing Centre

CONCEPTS GUIDE. Improving Personal Effectiveness With Versatility

presents MBTI Personality Profile Which Simpsons character are you most like?

A Helping Model of Problem Solving

Handout on Expectations, Transitions and Overcoming Imposter Syndrome

John Smith 20 October 2009

REPORT PREPARED FOR: Roger Plate REPORT DATE: November 05, 2009

Lumus360 Psychometric Profile Pat Sample

Reduce Tension by Making the Desired Choice Easier

Cheat Sheet: Emotional Eating

PEACE ON THE HOME-FRONT. Presented by: Claire Marsh Psychologist BPsych (Hons), Assoc. MAPS Manager Adventist Counselling Services

An INSIDE OUT Family Discussion Guide. Introduction.

Scott Fowler April 9, 2016

COMPARISON REPORT. For Gracie Lee Working with Alex Bradley. Friday, January 19, This report is provided by:

Achieving Good Mental Health

Which Simpsons Character are you aligned with? JP Bundle

Behavioral Intelligence

Session 16: Manage Your Stress

Transcription:

participant client HFM 03/13/201 This report was generated by the HFMtalentindex Online Assessment system. The data in this report are based on the answers given by the participant on one or more psychological tests. When interpreting this report, the user should be aware of the limitations of a psychological instrument. HFM trains its clients in the use of this report. HFM doesn't accept any liability for the consequences of the use of this report. No rights can be derived from the outcome and content of this report in any way. 201 HFM. All rights reserved. 201 HFM www.hfmtalentindex.com

Introduction The (B) report provides an indication of Ms Example's personality, based on the five widely used '' domains:,,,, and Sensitivity. The scores in this report are based on her responses to the HFMtalentindex personality measurement; a psychometric questionnaire, specifically designed to analyse relevant personality traits. The personality traits measured provide insight into the personal character traits responsible for Ms Example's behaviour. Based on these character traits, it is possible to make an assessment of the kind of behaviour she will display in practice. When using the B report, it is important to keep the following in mind: 1. The B report is generated by HFMtalentindex' rule-based expert system, meaning that the measurement is performed in a highly objective and accurate manner. The system generates results based on a combination of the expertise of experienced organisational psychologists, and extensive scientific research into the correlation between personality and work behaviour. 2. The scores in the B report were determined by comparing Ms Example's response pattern to that of an extensive norm group of people, representing a variety of professional roles in various sectors. As a result, the report provides a good overview of her personality. For each domain, as well as for the underlying personality facets, her score is shown, in comparison with the average of the norm group. 3. The B report is based on the answers provided by Ms Example regarding herself. This means that the measurement is based on Ms Example's selfimage. If this report is used in a selection or appraisal procedure, it is therefore important to compare the results in the report with information obtained from her CV, previous work experiences and results, an interview, and references, if applicable. Report structure The B report consists of four components. The first provides a graphical overview of Ms Example's scores on the domains, and a short explanation of what a high or low score means. In the second part, you can read what Ms Example's scores on the personality domains and facets mean for her attitude towards life, how this translates to her work behaviour, and the way in which she interacts with others. Part three includes a graphical overview of Ms Example's scores on all personality domains and facets. The report concludes with a few tips on how to handle any deviating scores. - 1 -

1. Graphical profile domains Below, you can see a graphical representation of Ms Example's score on each of the domains. For each domain, the meaning of either a low, or a high score, will be briefly discussed. People with low scores on task-orientedness mostly have a calm, relaxed approach towards their tasks and goals. They have less desire for achievement. Apart from that, people with low scores are often more flexible and are able to switch between matters easier because they aren't as strongly involved in things. People with high scores on task-orientedness feel that it is important to do things well and work hard to finish matters. They are less easily distracted and handle engagements more conscientiously. People with low scores on extraversion generally have a solitary nature. They seek out the company of others less actively and enjoy quietly working alone. People with high scores on extraversion enjoy being in other people s company. They are more exuberant, talkative and more often put themselves forward. People with low scores on interest mostly focus their interest on a limited number of areas. They value fixed habits and usually prefer the known and familiar to the new and uncertain. People with high scores on interest are inspired by all sorts of matters. They enjoy experiencing new things and going (deeply) into new issues all the time; they become bored otherwise. People with low scores on people-orientedness are more oriented towards their own interests than those of others. They are often competitive and less emotionally involved with the troubles of others. On the other hand, people with high scores on people-orientedness are strongly oriented towards the interests and feelings of others. They will do a lot for others and are usually more caring and helpful. Sensitivity In general, people with low scores on sensitivity aren't easily bothered by negative feelings and matters like stress. They feel calm and try to approach matters rationally. People with high scores on sensitivity worry more and are more attentive to things that are going on in their environment. As a result they can sometimes feel bad because they experience stress and emotions such as shame or fear more often. - 2 -

2. Textual explanation of the scores Below, you can read what Ms Example's scores on the domains mean for the way in which she approaches life, her work, and how she interacts with others. Score: Far above average Ms Example is keen on performing well and she is willing to work hard to do so. She is often very critical about her own performance. This makes her doubt whether she always has control of the things she has to do. At times, she finds it somewhat difficult to get started, but once she does, her approach to work is generally fairly disciplined. She always thinks carefully before making a decision and getting things in motion. She sticks to the chosen direction and she sometimes finds it difficult to deal with unexpected deviations. She really likes order and structure and will try to handle matters systematically. She thinks it is important to stick to commitments and rules, even when they don't really suit her purposes. Score: Average Ms Example enjoys working as a team, but she also frequently feels the need to do things alone. Ms Example doesn't easily become exuberant and may seem quite reserved as a result. She has an open demeanour and quickly feels at ease around others. Ms Example doesn't really feel that it is important to step into the limelight, but she does want her input to be taken seriously. Ms Example loves experiencing exciting things on a regular basis and she enjoys taking certain risks. She has enough energy to take matters on, but she doesn't need to be constantly on the go. Score: Clearly above average She enjoys experiencing new things sometimes, as long as the basis from which she works remains familiar. Ms Example feels that it is important to maintain a sound balance between theory and practice. The theory may fascinate her, but not without a practical significance. She tries to shape her own standards and values by thinking critically about issues. She leaves others free to their own convictions. Ms Example considers emotions to be important and she pays a lot of attention to them in her life. She has a large imagination and enjoys using it. She really enjoys spending time on matters such as art, culture and music. Score: Very high Ms Example feels quite involved with other people. That is why she usually enjoys helping others feel comfortable. She has quite a modest nature. She doesn't assume that her contribution is very special or important. She doesn't like to brag. If somebody disagrees with her, she will usually go along with their opinion, since she strongly dislikes a possible confrontation. Ms Example trusts that most people have good intentions and that they can be trusted on their word. Ms Example quite easily feels sympathetic and concerned about others. She has a rather caring nature. She thinks that it is important to be honest, even if this isn't in her own interest. - 3 -

Sensitivity Score: Far above average Ms Example doesn't easily become angry with others, but she can be agitated sometimes. She often feels pressured and stressed. It is difficult for her to deal with this effectively. Ms Example can worry rather quickly about the things she experiences, and she may feel restless and tense as a result. Ms Example sometimes isn't so pleased with herself and her life, and can sometimes feel downhearted as a result. She quite easily feels judged by others. This can make it difficult for her to act assertively. - 4 -

3. profile Sensitivity Self-assurance 3 Orderliness Conscientiousness Competitive spirit Self-discipline Cautiousness Friendliness Need for contact Dominance 4 Vitality Need for excitement Cheerfulness 3 Imagination Artistic interest Emotionality Inclination towards change 4 Intellectual interest Free-thinking Confidence Integrity Involvement Compliance Modesty Compassion Sensitivity Nervousness Anger 6 Dejection Embarrassment Sensitivity to stress - -

Social desirability The HFMtalentindex personality measurement is checked for socially desirable answering tendencies, by the inclusion of control questions. We distinguish between two types of social desirability, which will be discussed here. Self-deception A high score (2 or 3) on self-deception indicates that the participant unconsciously overestimates the effectiveness of her actions and her way of thinking. The participant runs the risk of overestimating himself and may have a rather unrealistic impression of how effective his own actions are. Participants who score high on the self-deception assessment often have difficulty identifying their own weak points. Tips for discussing the report When discussing the report, we recommend that you ask these participants about any feedback they may have received from those around them. By assessing this feedback, you may be able to break loose from the possibly distorted perception of the participant. You can do so by asking specific practical examples. For example, you can use the following questions: what are the strong points you are complimented on by your current manager? What are the improvement areas? What qualities do your colleagues appreciate you for? On what issues do you sometimes clash with colleagues? What do your subordinates identify as positive about your managerial style? What do they see as points requiring your attention? Impression management A high score (2 or 3) on impression management indicates that the participant consciously reports desirable behaviour and suppresses undesirable behaviour. This is the most obvious and conscious form of social desirability. The participant purposefully paints a picture of herself that is too positive. There is a risk that those participants were looking for the answers they thought to be the 'right answers' when completing the questionnaire. Tips for discussing the report When discussing the report, we recommend that you continue asking about the participant s strong points emerging from the report. We recommend that you also use specific practical examples for this purpose. It often clarifies matters if the participant has to describe a situation in which something went well, and a similar situation in which the participant was less successful. How were these situations different from one another? In the event of high scores on this point, watch out for so-called 'positive weak points', such as 'people might even say I work too hard'. A high score on one or both of the social desirability scales doesn't mean that the report is worthless. It indicates that you must be attentive to possible misrepresentations. The above explanation and tips may help you test the perception. Self-deception 1 Impression management 1-6 -