Supplementary Appendix

Similar documents
Supplementary Appendix

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Part A Part B Part C

Phase 1 Study Combining Anti-PD-L1 (MEDI4736) With BRAF (Dabrafenib) and/or MEK (Trametinib) Inhibitors in Advanced Melanoma

Targeted Therapies in Melanoma

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI

Title A Phase II study of oral LBH589 in adult patients with refractory cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma

Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC): 24-month update of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study

Efficacy of anti-pd-1 therapy in patients with melanoma brain metastases

Initial Results from an Open-label, Doseescalation Phase I Study of the Oral BRAF Inhibitor LGX818 in BRAF V600 mutant Advanced Melanoma

BCCA Protocol Summary for the Treatment of BRAF V600 Mutation- Positive Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma Using dabrafenib and Trametinib

BRAF Inhibitors in Metastatic disease. Grant McArthur MB BS PhD Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne, Australia

Supplementary Online Content

Virtual Journal Club: Front-Line Therapy and Beyond Recent Perspectives on ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Subject: Cobimetinib (Cotellic ) Tablet

Study No Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Immunotherapy Prior to or After BRAF Inhibitors

Presenter Disclosure Information

The Development of Encorafenib (LGX818) and Binimetinib (MEK162) in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

BR is an established treatment regimen for CLL in the front-line and R/R settings

Overall Survival in COLUMBUS: A Phase 3 Trial of Encorafenib (ENCO) Plus Binimetinib (BINI) vs Vemurafenib (VEM) or ENCO in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma

Management of Brain Metastases Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD

Clinical Study Synopsis

Osimertinib Activity in Patients With Leptomeningeal Disease From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Updated Results From the BLOOM Study

Supplementary Table 1: Summary of 33 Patients Treated with Abemaciclib in Dose Escalation

To assess safety profiles: significant laboratory changes and adverse events (AEs).

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol and Results Registration System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: 09/30/2015. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT

Study Comparing Combination of LGX818 Plus MEK162 Versus Vemurafenib and LGX818 Monotherapy in BRAF Mutant Melanoma (COLUMBUS)

ASCO / COLUMBUS ENCORE PRESENTATION June 4, 2018

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT Adi Diab 1, Nizar Tannir 1, Daniel Cho

Carcinoma de Tiroide: Teràpies Diana

PRODUCT MONOGRAPH. Trametinib Tablets. 0.5 mg and 2 mg. ATC Code: L01XE23 Protein Kinase Inhibitor

ONT-380 and HER2+ Breast Cancer

Drug Niraparib Olaparib

Lung Cancer Case. Since the patient was symptomatic, a targeted panel was sent. ALK FISH returned in 2 days and was positive.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Synopsis (C1034T02) CNTO 95 Module 5.3 Clinical Study Report C1034T02

Response and resistance to BRAF inhibitors in melanoma

A First-in-class Phase 1 Dose-escalation Study of the Novel Oral ERK 1/2 Kinase Inhibitor BVD-523 (ulixertinib) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Evolving Treatment Strategies in the Management of Metastatic Melanoma: Novel Therapies for Improved Patient Outcomes. Disclosures

Principal Investigator: Robert J. Jones, MD, Beatson Cancer Center, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow; United Kingdom

Presented at the 58 th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition, December 5, 2016, San Diego, CA

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Clinical Study Synopsis

Accrual Status We are currently only enrolling patients who are either:

ALK Inhibition: From Biology to Approved Therapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Randomized trial of irinotecan and cetuximab with or without vemurafenib in BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (SWOG S1406)

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

presentation session & clinical Keith T. Flaherty, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania


This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

B. G. Redman University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. J. A. Thompson University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Clinical Activity and Safety of Anti-PD-1 (BMS , MDX-1106) in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

Appendices. Appendix A Search terms

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Supplementary Online Content

Pembrolizumab for Patients With PD-L1 Positive Advanced Carcinoid or Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results From the KEYNOTE-028 Study

PRODUCT MONOGRAPH. Trametinib Tablets. 0.5 mg and 2 mg. Protein Kinase Inhibitor (L01XE23)

Clinical Study Synopsis

Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is overall survival, measured as the time in weeks from randomization to date of death due to any cause.

Array BioPharma Jefferies 2016 Global Healthcare Conference. June 9, 2016

ASCO Annual Meeting 2013, May 31 June , Chicago, IL

Tafinlar. Tafinlar (dabrafenib) Description

At Fox Chase Cancer Centre during study participation

Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Therapy of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Subjects With BRAF V600E- Mutated Rare Cancers

The changing landscape of medical management of stage III and IV melanoma Current treatments and what s on the horizon

ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SYNOPSIS. Issue Date: 31 July 2013

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): SAR (iniparib)

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Sponsor: Sanofi Drug substance(s): GZ316455

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Trametinib (Mekinist) for Metastatic Melanoma October 22, 2013

New paradigms for treating metastatic melanoma

Modern therapy in oncology Metastatic melanoma

Do You Think Like the Experts? Refining the Management of Advanced NSCLC With ALK Rearrangement. Reference Slides Introduction

Duvelisib (IPI-145), a PI3K-δ,γ Inhibitor, is Clinically Active in Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer:

Product: Talimogene Laherparepvec Clinical Study Report: Date: 31 October 2018 Page 1

Efficacy of larotrectinib in adolescents and young adults with TRK fusion cancer

Immunotherapy for Melanoma. Michael Postow, MD Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Best Practices in the Treatment and Management of Metastatic Melanoma. Melanoma

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Docetaxel (Taxotere )

Eric Van Cutsem University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium

BRAF Inhibition in Melanoma

Summary... 2 MELANOMA AND OTHER SKIN TUMOURS... 3

BCCA Protocol Summary for the Treatment of BRAF V600 Mutation- Positive Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma using vemurafenib and cobimetinib

Mekinist. Mekinist (trametinib) Description

Supplementary Appendix

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Clinical Study Synopsis

Immunotherapy in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma: Where Do We Stand? Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD St. Luke s Cancer Center Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Opzioni terapeutiche nel paziente ALK-traslocato

Overview: Immunotherapy in CNS Metastases

Tumor Board Discussions: Case 1

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Nivolumab in Patients With DNA Mismatch Repair Deficient/Microsatellite Instability High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Update From CheckMate 142

Melanoma. Il parere dell esperto. V. Ferraresi. Divisione di Oncologia Medica 1

First-Line Ribociclib + Letrozole for Postmenopausal Women With HR+, HER2-, Advanced Breast Cancer: First Results From the Phase III MONALEESA-2 Study

Transcription:

Supplementary Appendix This appendix has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Supplement to: Flaherty KT, Infante JR, Daud A, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1694-703. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1210093 (PDF updated January 3, 2013.)

Supplementary Appendix Supplement to: Flaherty KT, Infante JI, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition in Melanoma with BRAF V600 Mutations Contents Acknowledgments page 2 Supplementary methods page 2 Supplementary figure 1 page 6 Supplementary figure 2a page 7 Supplementary figure 2b page 8 Supplementary figure 3 page 9 Supplementary figure 4 page 10 Supplementary table 1 page 11 Supplementary table 2 page 12 Supplementary table 3 page 13 Supplementary table 4 page 14 Supplementary table 5 page 15 1

Acknowledgements We also thank our investigators and study staff who contributed to the study (listed in alphabetical order by country): Australia: Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Austin Hospital- Miles Andrews; Westmead-Arthur Clements, the staff of Sydney West Cancer Trials Centre, and the Surgical, Dermatology and Anatomical Pathology staff of Westmead Hospital and Melanoma Institute Australia; USA: University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center- Ravi Amaravadi, Lydia Giles; Vanderbilt University- Kristin Ancell; Angeles Clinic- Peter Boasberg; U.T. MD Anderson Cancer Center- Wen-Jen Hwu; University of Colorado Denver-Amanda Iman; University of California San Francisco- Andrea Kantor; Massachusetts General Hospital- Donald Lawrence; Mayo Clinic- Robert McWilliams; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology- Salah Nabhan; Dana Farber Cancer Institute- Geoffrey Shapiro; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Green Spring Station- William Sharfman; Yale Medical Center- Mario Sznol; Moffitt Cancer Center- Patricia Urbas. Supplementary methods Eligibility Brain metastases were considered stable if they met the following criteria: asymptomatic with no corticosteroids and/or enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants for 30 days, confirmed stable with two consecutive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scans 90 days apart, and previously treated with surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery; those with untreated brain metastases were excluded. 2

Patients with a history of cardiovascular or interstitial lung disease and evidence or risk of retinal vein occlusion or central serous retinopathy were also excluded. Assessments A baseline disease assessment, using CT scan or MRI of chest, abdomen and pelvis, was performed and repeated every 8 weeks. Responses were assessed by investigators using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; 1.1). Adverse events, graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 4.0), were assessed throughout the study and for 14 days after treatment was discontinued. Demographic data and disease characteristics were recorded at baseline. Patients also underwent a physical examination, which included electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram (ECHO), and ophthalmologic evaluation at baseline. In addition, patients vital signs and ECOG-PS were recorded at this time. Physical examinations and assessment of ECOG-PS were repeated at every cycle, ECG and ECHO assessments were repeated at Week 4, and then every 12 weeks, while ophthalmologic evaluations were repeated as clinically indicated. Chemistry and hematology were assessed every 4 weeks. A baseline disease assessment, using CT scan or MRI of chest, abdomen and pelvis, was performed and repeated every 8 weeks. Responses were assessed by investigators using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; 1.1). Adverse events, graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3

(CTCAE; version 4.0), were assessed throughout the study and for 14 days post treatment. Pharmacokinetics Samples for PK analyses were obtained at timed intervals up to 24 hours after a single dose of dabrafenib on Day 1 and with trametinib on Day 15 in Part A; on Day 15, or Day 21 using serial samples up to 8 hours post-dose in Part B; and pre-dose on Day 15, and then every 8 weeks in Part C. Plasma concentrations of dabrafenib and its metabolites, and trametinib were analyzed using validated methods. Statistical methods PFS was defined as the time from first dose (Part B) or randomization (Part C) to the first documented radiological progression or death, based on investigator assessment. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method and comparisons utilized a log-rank test. RR and duration of response are reported for each treatment group, along with the 95% confidence interval (CI), and between-group comparisons were conducted. Safety analyses included all patients who had received 1 dose of study medication and are summarized by frequency and proportion of the total population. Serious adverse events and those leading to treatment discontinuation are summarized separately. Study Oversight This study (NCT01072175) was funded, administrated, and sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. The original protocol was designed by Keith Flaherty, M.D. and the 4

sponsor. The sponsor collected and analyzed the data and vouches for such data and analysis. All authors had access to all study data. The lead authors (K.T.F., J.R.I., and J.W.) developed the first draft of the manuscript in collaboration with the sponsor. All authors reviewed subsequent drafts and are responsible for the decision to publish. 5

Supplemental Figure 1 - CONSORT diagram * * One patient was randomized to dabrafenib monotherapy but received 150/2 combination. As a result, a total of 55 subjects received combination 150/2 in Part C 6

Supplemental Figure 2a - Dabrafenib Pharmacokinetics in Part B Patients 7

Supplemental Figure 2b - Trametinib Pharmacokinetics in Part B Patients 8

Supplemental Figure 3 - Overall Survival in Part C 9

Supplemental Figure 4 - Independent Review Committee Assessed Progression Free Survival in Part C 10

Supplementary Tables Table S1. Part C - Study medication exposure, dose interruptions, and dose reductions Part C/randomized Phase II (n=162) Dabrafenib Monotherapy (n=53) Combination 150 mg/1 mg (n=54) Combination 150mg/ 2 mg (n=55) Exposure Median duration on study treatment, months (min, max) 6.1 (1.8, 15.2) 10.5 (0.9, 16.4) 11.0 (2.1, 17.3) Dose Interruptions due to toxicity any dose interruption, n (%) 15 (28) 32 (59) 37 (67) dabrafenib dose interruption, n (%) 15 (28) 31 (57) 34 (62) trametinib dose interruption, n (%) NA 29 (54) 35 (64) Dose Reductions due to toxicity any dose reduction 10 (19) 27 (50) 32 (58) dabrafenib dose reduction, n (%) 10 (19) 27 (50) 30 (55) re-escalation, n(%)* 9 (90) 20 (74) 28 (93) trametinib dose reduction, n (%) NA 1 (2) 12 (22) re-escalation, n(%)** NA 0 4 (33) * For percentage calculation, the denominator is the number of subjects with dabrafenib reduction. ** For percentage calculation, the denominator is the number of subjects with trametinib dose reduction. One subject was randomized to dabrafenib monotherapy but received combination 150/2. This subject was included in combination 150/2 safety analyses. 11

Table S2. Part A - Assessment of repeat-dose trametinib on single-dose dabrafenib pharmacokinetics Dabrafenib PK parameter Number of patients (Day 1/Day 15) Geometric Least-Squares Mean Ratio for Day 15/Day 1 (90% CI) AUC (0-t) (ng.hr/ml) 8/8 1.01 (0.85, 1.19) AUC (0-inf) (ng.hr/ml) 7/8 0.94 (0.82, 1.08) C max (ng/ml) 8/8 1.03 (0.79, 1.34) 12

Table S3. Parts A and B - Patient characteristics at baseline Characteristic Parts A and B* (n=85) All doses Median age, years (range) 52.8 (25-80) Male gender, n (%) 53 (62%) White race, n (%) 83 (98%) ECOG performance status, n (%) 0 1 M status, n (%) M0 M1a M1b M1c 45 (53%) 40 (47%) 0 6 (7%) 11 (13%) 68 (80%) Disease sites 3, n (%) 60 (71%) History of brain metastases, n (%) 22 (26%) LDH > upper limit of normal, n (%) 41 (48%) BRAF mutation status, n (%) V600E V600K 77 (91) 7 (8) Previous chemotherapy, n (%) 49 (58%) Previous immunotherapy, n (%) 26 (31%) *Other patients included in Part B (dose escalation) were: BRAF inhibitor-treated melanoma (n=26), colorectal (n=28), other tumor types (n=4, 1 non-small cell lung, 1 thyroid, 1 salivary ductal carcinoma, and 1 large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma). One patient in Part A/B was V600R. 13

Table S4. Part B - Summary of efficacy endpoints 75 mg BID/ 1 mg QD (n=6) 150 mg BID/ 1 mg QD (n=22) 150 mg BID/ 1.5 mg QD (n=25) 150 mg BID/ 2 mg QD (n=24) Median PFS, months (95% CI) 8.7 (5.3,16.6) 8.2 (5.4, 11.0) 5.4 (3.5, 12.8) 10.8 (5.3, 14.4) PFS rate at 12 months, % (95% CI) 33 (5, 68) 27 (11, 46) 32 (15, 50) 44 (24, 63) Best Response, months (%) Complete Response (CR) 0 4 (18) 0 2 (8) Partial Response (PR) 4 (67) 10 (45) 11 (44) 13 (54) Stable Disease (SD) 2 (33) 7 (32) 11 (44) 9 (38) Non-CR/Non-PD 0 0 1 (4) 0 Progressive Disease (PD) 0 1 (5) 2 (8) 0 Response Rate CR+PR (%) 4 (67) 14 (64) 11 (44) 15 (63) 95% CI 22.3, 95.7 40.7, 82.8 24.4, 65.1 40.6, 81.2 Median Duration of Response, months (95% CI) 12.4 (3.7, 14.9) 8.4 (5.5, NA) 12.6 (6.5, NA) 11.3 (9.1, 16.9) 14

Table S5. Part B - Adverse events in >20% regardless of causal relationship 75 mg BID/ 1 mg QD (n=6) 150 mg BID/ 1 mg QD (n=22) 150 mg BID/ 1.5 mg QD (n=25) 150 mg BID/ 2 mg QD (n=24) Grade 3/4 Total Grade 3/4 Total Grade 3/4 Total Grade 3/4 Total Any event 3 (50) 6 (100) 13 (59) 22 (100) 12 (48) 25 (100) 12 (50) 24 (100) Pyrexia 0 4 (67) 1 (5) 12 (55) 1 (4) 13 (52) 2 (8) 21 (88) Chills 1 (17%) 3 (50) 1 (5%) 10 (45) 0 10 (40) 1 (4) 18 (75) Fatigue 0 4 (67) 2 (9) 12 (55) 2 (8) 12 (48) 1 (4) 13 (54) Headache 0 3 (50) 0 10 (45) 0 7 (28) 0 11 (46) Nausea 0 2 (33) 1 (5) 9 (41) 0 10 (40) 0 10 (42) Cough 0 3 (50) 0 3 (14) 0 9 (36) 0 10 (42) Rash 0 2 (33) 0 4 (18) 0 8 (32) 0 10 (42) Vomiting 0 2 (33) 1 (5) 6 (27) 0 8 (32) 1 (4) 9 (38) Diarrhea 0 2 (33) 2 (9) 9 (41) 0 6 (24) 0 9 (38) Arthralgia 1 (17) 2 (33) 0 4 (18) 1 (4) 4 (16) 0 9 (38) Acneiform dermatitis 0 0 0 1 (5) 0 3 (12) 0 8 (33) Night sweats 0 1 (17) 0 3 (14) 0 6 (24) 0 7 (29) Dizziness 0 1 (17) 0 3 (14) 0 4 (16) 0 7 (29) Constipation 0 1 (17) 0 6 (27) 0 5 (20) 0 6 (25) Edema peripheral 0 0 0 5 (23) 0 5 (20) 0 6 (25) Decreased appetite 0 3 (50) 0 1 (5) 0 4 (16) 0 6 (25) Pain in extremity 0 1 (17) 0 4 (18) 0 1 (4) 0 5 (21) 15

Ejection fraction decreased 0 0 0 1 (5) 0 1 (4) 0 5 (21) Oropharyngeal pain 0 0 0 1 (5) 0 1 (4) 0 5 (21) Anaemia 0 0 0 4 (18) 1 (4) 2 (8) 1 (4) 5 (21) Abdominal pain 0 2 (33) 1 (5) 4 (18) 1 (4) 2 (8) 0 3 (13) Asthenia 0 0 2 (9) 6 (27) 1 (4) 4 (16) 0 2 (8) Rash generalized 1 (17) 2 (33) 0 3 (14) 0 0 0 1 (4) Pain 0 2 (33) 0 2 (9) 0 2 (8) 0 0 Vision blurred 0 2 (33) 0 3 (14) 0 2 (8) 0 0 16