Office of Research Compliance. Research Involving Human Subjects

Similar documents
IRB for Humanists. Naomi E. Coll, MPH, CPH, CIP Manager of Research Integrity

Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home) Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home)

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

Human Subjects Research: Overview. Colleen Kohashi and Tani Prestage Office for the Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS) February 26, 2016

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE

Q5 If there is more than one faculty researcher, then enter co-researchers information (Name, address)

EXEMPT RESEARCH. Investigators should contact the IRB Office if there are questions about whether an amendment consists

Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures

Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:

IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW

PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION TO USE HUMAN PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH

IRB FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. 1. Who must apply for human subjects review through the IRB (Institutional Research Board)?

MDCH IRB REVIEW APPLICATION Authority: Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46

Summary of Changes to Human Subjects Regulations: Effective January 21, 2019

APPLICATION/RESEARCH PROTOCOL REVIEW FORM

Research. + Human Subjects Protections for. IRB Review and Approval at UW. October, Bailey Bodell, CIP. Reliance Administrator

Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethics, Process, and Guidance for Streamlining IRB Review

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE

Type of Review Requested:

October 2017 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL

Institutional Review Board. Policies and Procedures

POLICIES GOVERNING PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH AND TEACHING AT WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

REQUIRED INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) EDUCATIONAL READING FOR FLETCHER SCHOOL RESEARCHERS APPLYING FOR EXEMPTION FROM IRB

*Explain the purpose & role of the IRB *Explain the IRB Review Categories *Discuss the potential risks to research participants

Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS

Protection of Research Subjects: The IRB Process

HSPC/IRB Description of Research Form (For research projects involving human participants)

IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College

The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics

BARNARD COLLEGE Application for the Approval of the Use of Human Subjects in Research

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

Institutional Review Board Policy and Guidelines Primary Author: Dennis M. Sullivan, MD, MA (Ethics) (Revised: 2/5/2018)

Institutional Review of Research Involving Human Participants. IRB Presentation. University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization

Human Subjects Protection Specialist October 22 nd, 2010

APPLICATION TO INVOLVE HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH (Form IAUPRIRB-1)

OHRP Guidance on the Involvement of Prisoners in Research

IRB, IDEATE, AND HSR. February, 2018 Manuel Gonzalez

Human Subjects Application for Full IRB and Expedited Exempt Review

Investigator s Handbook for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Institutional Review Board Revised February 23, 2017

Policies and Procedures Manual Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB)

RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN PARTICIPANTS EXPEDITED/FULL APPLICATION

SALISBURY UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESEARCH APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

IRB GRAND ROUNDS SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH: NEED TO KNOW

Revised Common Rule: Next Steps

DETERMINING WHETHER AN ACTIVITY IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL REGULATIONS

1. What is your role in the AAHRPP accreditation process?

Florida A&M University IRB & Investigator Manual

Levels of IRB Review

RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HANDBOOK Guide for Research involving Human Subjects Effective June 2016 with the Implementation of IRBManager

Northwestern University Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Policy and Procedure Regarding Use of Human Subjects in Research

MC IRB Protocol No.:

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Handbook

Kate Gallin Heffernan (Chair) (617) Mark A. Borreliz (617)

Northwestern University Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Institutional Review Board (IRB) at SMU. Dr. Maribeth Kuenzi, Chair Ms. Shannon Lunt, SMU Director of Research Compliance

IRB Red Flags How to Know When IRB Review May Be Needed

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG Human Research Ethics Committee for Non-Clinical Faculties Application Form for Ethical Approval

Student Handbook: Making Sense of Human Subjects Research

Institutional Review Board Application

Final Rule Material: Changes to Exempt Categories

The AAA statement on Ethnography and Institutional Review Boards (2004) provides a useful working definition:

Language for Consent Forms

AN INVESTIGATOR S GUIDE TO RESEARCH WITH HUMAN PARTICIPANTS

COMMON RULE 2019 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JANUARY 21, 2019

Human Research Participant Protection Program

Application for Ethical Approval of Research Proposals

Human Subject Institutional Review Board Proposal Form

IRB Review Points to Consider September 2016

Protecting Human Subjects

Preliminary Research Considerations. Lecture Overview. Stephen E. Brock, Ph.D., NCSP

Rockhurst University Institutional Review Board

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Research That Must Be Reviewed by the IRB

IRBMED Seminar Series

Revised August 28, 2018

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS ST. MARY'S UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE Institutional Review Board

SUBJECT: SJMHS Institutional Review Board(s): Vulnerable Populations - Research Involving Prisoners

Florida State University Policy 7-IRB-26

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

IDENTIFYING, ASSESSING, AND RESOLVING ISSUES IN SOCIAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (SBER)

Student Guide To Ethics Review For Research Involving Human Subjects

IRB Reviewer Worksheet for Expedited Reviews

PHONE SCRIPTS, QUESTIONNAIRES AND WAIVERS OF DOCUMENTATION. Bertha delanda, CIP IRB Training Specialist January 2012

Protection of Human Subjects In Research Principles, Policy, and Research

Title of Research Study: Discovery and Validation of Biomarkers for Lichen Sclerosus

The University of Memphis Institutional Review Board. Policy Manual. Human Subjects Protections in Research

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Manual

IRB Policy 5 Research Activities

CAPE PENINSULA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY HEALTH AND WELLNESS SCIENCES RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE

We are inviting you to participate in a research study/project that has two components.

REGIS UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

Daniel T Lackland. Medical University of South Carolina

VERBAL CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A RESEARCH STUDY AND HIPPA AUTHORIZATION

Policies, Regulations and Guidelines. For. Research Involving Human Subjects

SACI ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION POLICY

Guidelines for Ethical Conduct of Behavioral Projects Involving Human Participants by High School Students

SJC IRB. Policies and Procedures. Institutional Review Board Committee Chair: Peter Lin, Ph.D.

Transcription:

Office of Research Compliance Research Involving Human Subjects

Office of Research Compliance Three FTE and one student worker Facilitate the IACUC We are not the IRB or the IACUC Best way to contact us - researchcompliance@kent.edu

Kent State Human Research Protection Program The mission of the Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) is to protect the rights, dignity, welfare, and privacy of the human subjects in all research conducted on behalf of the University (regardless of funding) by ensuring that research is conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Belmont Report, and the guidance provided in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 part 46, and other applicable regulations and laws. Critical components: The Institutional Review Board (IRB), Institutional Review Board Policy Committee (IPC) Office of Research Compliance Office of Research Safety, HIPPA compliance Officer, FERPA, Title IX, IT Security Officer, University Counsel, Technology Transfer

Purpose & Authority of the IRB PURPOSE Review research and ensure that the rights and welfare of the human subjects involved in research are adequately protected this means make sure risks do not outweigh benefits! Ensure that the research is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations, (Title 45 Part 46 Protection of Human Subjects) and any other applicable rules such as University Policy, Sponsor Requirements, State Law. AUTHORITY Approve the research. Require modifications before approving the research. Disapprove the research. Table the research protocol for modification and further review.

What is Human Subjects Research Per federal regulations Research is defined as a systematic investigations, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to contributed to generalizable knowledge A human subject is a living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains data through intervention or interaction with the individual or collects identifiable private information For a project to be considered human subjects research, both definitions must be met.

Types of Review Initial Level of review is determined. Continuing/Annual Review Level II s and III s. Amendments changes to research. Must be reviewed and approved before implemented. Adverse events - safety Information or unanticipated problems for subjects or others. Noncompliance a participant calls Research Compliance office and reports that investigator is doing something he/she shouldn t be.

Initial Review of Research All research projects are categorized into one of three categories for the IRB review process. Each category is different in the level of scrutiny and submission procedures. The IRB is responsible for making the final decision of which category a research project falls under. Level III Full review by convened IRB Sensitive subjects, vulnerable subjects, sometimes children Level I Level II Expedited* Can Involve children, audiotaping, research on individual or group behavior (focus groups) Exempt from Annual Review* Surveys, evaluation of service programs, educational tests, class projects, food quality, research involving existing data *typically do not need to attend meetings, approved through member review processes

Application forms Available at www.kent.edu/research. 1 2 3

IRB Review Determination Types of Application forms Exempt from Annual Review (Level I projects) Use of Human Subjects in Research (Level II or Level III projects) Institutional Authorization Agreement Request

IRB Review Determination When should you complete this form? Types of Application forms Exempt from Annual Review (Level I projects) if you are unsure whether or not your research needs IRB review when you need documentation that your project does not need IRB review To whom should you submit it? Use of Human Subjects in Research (Level II or Level III projects) Office of Research Compliance - Researchcompliance@kent.edu Institutional Authorization Agreement Request

When should you complete this form? IRB Review Determination Federal Regulations allow 6 categories of research that can be considered exempt. Types of Application forms Your research needs to only fit into one category though you can choose more than one category on the application form. Exempt from Annual Review (Level I projects) Use of Human Subjects in Research (Level II or Level III projects) Institutional Authorization Agreement Request

Exempt from Annual Review Level I Category 1 - Educational Settings/normal educational practices (e.g., class evaluations, comparisons of instructional techniques, effectiveness of an instructional method) Category 2 - Educational Tests, Surveys, Interviews, Observation of Public Behavior (e.g., surveys or interviews whose subject matter would not place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or would be damaging to their financial standing, reputation or employment; observation of children if researcher does not participate in activties) Category 3 - Educational Tests, Surveys, Interviews, Observation of public officials (e.g., research involving interviews with mayors or school board members (those that are elected) not police officers or teachers.

Exempt from Annual Review Level I Category 4 - Existing Data, documents, specimens - the information must be publicly available OR information is recorded by the Investigator in a way that subjects cannot be readily identified (e.g., limited data set record reviews, de-identified specimens purchased from a reputable commercial lab) Category 5 Public Benefit or Service Programs - research that is subject to approval of a federal department or agency head (e.g., financial or medical benefits provided by the Affordable Care Act or Social Security program) Category 6 Taste and Food Quality/Consumer Acceptance Studies- research involving foods without additives or foods in which contain food ingredients, agricultural chemicals or environmental contaminants that are at or below the level found to be safe by the Food and Drug Administration or is approved by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

When should you complete this form? IRB Review Determination If you think that there is more than minimal risk for the participants Minimal risk means that the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not Exempt greater from in and Annual of Review themselves Types of than those ordinarily encountered in daily (Level life or I projects) during Application the performance formsof routine physical or psychological examinations or tests. Use of Human Subjects in Research Vulnerable populations ( i.e., prisoners, pregnant (Level women, II or children, Level III projects) mentally disabled) Sensitive subject matter (i.e., suicide, sexual orientation, mental illness) Deception Institutional Authorization Agreement Request Invasive procedures, devices, drugs/supplements, group behavior, clinical trials

When should you complete this form? IRB Review Determination If you want to conduct a research project at another Exempt institution from Annual that Review has an IRB and you : Types of (Level I projects) Want Application the KSU forms IRB to serve as the IRB of record for the project, or Want to request that another Institution's IRB serve as the IRB of record for your project. To whom should you submit the form? Use of Human Subjects in Research (Level II or Level III projects) Office of Research Compliance - Researchcompliance@kent.edu Institutional Authorization Agreement Request

The process If completing this type of form: IRB Review Determination Exempt from Annual Review Level I Amendment Annual Review Institutional Authorization Agreement Request Adverse Event Closeout Send via email from your kent.edu account Office of Research Compliance Researchcompliance @kent.edu

The process If completing this type of form: Use of Human Subjects in Research (Level II or Level III) Send via email from your kent.edu account Discipline-specific Reviewer Email Addresses available on the website

Required Training Valid for 3 years. Submit a copy of the CITI completion certificate with your IRB application. NIH training taken within 3 years can fulfill the CITI requirement. You must submit a NIH training completion certificate with the IRB application. Instructions are available on the website. Online CITI training is required for ALL KSU researchers conducting human subject research. This includes: Principal investigators and co-investigators Students Faculty advisors for students conducting research. Faculty requiring students to conduct research for a course. Visiting scholars

CITI Training SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL BASIC/REFRESHER COURSE Choose this course if you are a researcher that is conducting Social/Behavioral (sociology, anthropology, psychology, education) research on human subjects that involves more than minimal risk. BIOMEDICAL BASIC/REFRESHER COURSE - Choose this course if you are a researcher that is conducting Biomedical (biology, physiology, clinical medicine) research involving human subjects that involves more than minimal risk. If you are collecting medical information from the participants and/or are gaining access to medical records, this is the training that you need to complete.

Characteristics of a good one: CONSENT FORMS Provides potential subjects with information about the research. Focus on need to know information, not theoretical background. Correctly describes the study. Emphasizes that participation is voluntary and that they are able to stop their participation at any time. Easy to read. Use short sentences and words (when possible). Should be written the way in which you speak to the participants (use you instead of the subject ). Uses bulleted lists rather than paragraphs when possible.

Common Mistakes Indicating that data is anonymous when it is actually confidential. Stating that there are no risks involved in the activity. Even though the risks may be low, they need to be listed in the application and consent form. Can often be described as no greater than everyday life. Not completing CITI online training, or completing the wrong online training. Appendices, Consent forms, surveys, or interview instruments are not attached for review. Not answering all of the questions on the application or appendices. Sending application directly to the Office of Research Compliance when it should be sent to a discipline specific reviewer first. Not attaching translated consent forms for international research. The application is difficult to understand. Consent form is long and/or difficult to understand.

Common Questions How long does it take to get approval? Plan ahead. Do not wait until the last minute to submit your application. Approval can take 1-6 weeks. The more complete your application is the quicker you can get approval. The total volume of submission received and the complexity/completeness of you submission will influence approval timelines

Common Questions Is there somewhere where I can get a template to help me develop the consent form for my study? Yes, visit the ORC website. Do I always have to attend an IRB meeting to have my protocol approved? No, typically only when your protocol is deemed a Level III. If you are an advisor on a student s protocol that is reviewed as a Level III project you will have to attend the meeting.

THANK YOU! Questions

What is the difference between anonymous and confidential?

Who has overall responsibility for an approved research protocol?

Name at least two characteristics of a good consent form?