Left Atrial Appendage Closure in SCRIPPS CLINIC

Similar documents
Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Era of Novel Anticoagulants

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Appendage Closure. Jason Rogers, MD. Director, Interventional Cardiology UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California

William A. Gray MD System Chief of Cardiovascular Services, Main Line Health President, Lankenau Heart Institute Wynnewood, Pennsylvania USA

THINK OUTSIDE THE PILLBOX

Occlusion de l'auricule gauche: Niche ou réel avenir? D Gras, MD, Nantes, France

Left Atrial Appendage Closure 4 questions Who? When? How? Results?

Watchman. Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device. Uniquely engineered for the LAA 1-3 with proven safety and longterm efficacy. 4-8

Page 1. Current Trends in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. Atrial fibrillation: Scope of the problem

Update in Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices. Faisal Al-Samadi MBBS, FRCPC, FACP, FACC, FSCAI, FHRS

CARDIOLOGY GRAND ROUNDS

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices. Atrial Fibrillation 10/11/2017

Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation 2015 UPDATE

Devices to Protect Against Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation

Left atrial appendage occlusion

Gauging stroke risk across the AF spectrum and selecting the appropriate patient for LAA closure. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

Update in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: More Options

Atrial Fibrillation. Atrial Fibrillation

PREVAIL: 5-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs Medical Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Moving Beyond Blood Thinners to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation October 29, 2016

Safety and efficacy results in the EWOLUTION all-comers LAA closure study: DAPT subgroup

The Poor Long-Term Candidate for Warfarin: NOAC or Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Trick or Treat 2: A New Era of Stroke Prevention in AF? WATCHMAN and LARIAT?

Live in a Box: Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device

Cryptogenic Stroke: A logical approach to a common clinical problem

PERCUTANEOUS STRUCTURAL UPDATES TAVR WATCHMAN(LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUDERS) MITRACLIP PARAVALVULAR LEAK REPAIRS ASD/PFO CLOSURES VALVULOPLASTIES

Patients selection criteria for LAA occlusion. Young Keun On, MD, PhD, FHRS Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

Primary Care Atrial Fibrillation Update: Anticoagulation and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. Greg Francisco, MD, FACC

Percutaneous Left Atrial appendage occlusion and anticoagulation therapy Nicolas Lellouche, MD, PhD

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: The Rationale

Disclosures 6/16/2015. Preventing Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Warfarin Intolerance / Non-Compliance

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Neurological events

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Techniques: 2015

Watchman Implantation Case Presentation and Discussion

Modern aspects in multidisciplinary thromboembolic prophylaxis. AMPLATZER Left Atrial Appendage data update

SURGICAL VS ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIAS DEBATE 2: LAA CLOSURE IS BEST DONE WITH DEVICES

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Shutting Out Embolic Disease Without Anticoagulation

Manuel Castellá Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Clínic, Universidad de

Continuing Cardiology Education

Technology Assessment Report No. 302

Combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure as a. treatment of atrial fibrillation

LAA Occluders: The Right Device for the Right Patient ACC/SHA MEETING OCTOBER 31 ST 2015 JEDDAH, KSA OMER A. M. ELAMIN, MD, FACC

ADC Slides for Presentation 02/10/2017

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Valid Option to Anticoagulation for Long-term Prevention of Stroke Saibal Kar, MD

Watchman a Stroke Prevention Technology for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke Prevention in AF: How will it change in the next 5 years? Jeff Healey MD, MSc, FHRS Population Health Research Institute McMaster University

ESC Congress 2012, Munich

Role of cardiac imaging for catheterbased left atrial appendage closure

6 th ACC-SHA Joint Meeting Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

WATCHMAN: Where do we stand

THINK OUTSIDE THE PILLBOX

8/16/2016. Disclosures. Is Uninterrupted OAC Standard of Care for AF Ablation? CHRS 2016, San Francisco. Risk of Stroke Peri-Ablation

Percutaneous Epicardial LAA Closure: When Does it Make Sense?

Antithrombotic Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Etexilate

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 33 million

THINK OUTSIDE THE PILLBOX

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Techniques and Guidelines. Mohammad Shenasa, MD Heart & Rhythm Medical Group San Jose, CA

LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE INSTEAD OF ANTICOAGULATION; INDICATIONS AND OUTCOMES. Sheetal Chandhok, MD

Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

NOAC trials for AF: A review

SHARED DECISION MAKING: AN EVIDENCE-BASED CORNERSTONE OF LAAC THERAPY

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Andrea Robinson, RN, MSN, ACNP

Atrial Fibrillaiton and Heart Failure: Anticoagulation therapy in all cases?

Left-Atrial Appendage Closure Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

Dad needed to get off his blood thinner. His doctor told us about an alternative. It s called

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

NEW APPROACHES AND NEW ANTICOAGULANTS FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

What the general cardiologist should know about arrhythmia Stroke prevention in AF" Peter Ammann Kantonsspital St. Gallen

Rate or Rhythm Control? Epidemiology. Relevant Advances in Atrial Fibrillation 6/20/2011. Stroke Prophylaxis

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Role of NOACs in AF Management. From Evidence to Real World Data Focus on Cardioversion

Secondary Preven-on of Thromboembolic Stroke: Clinical Data and Recommenda-ons from the ESC Atrial Fibrilla-on Guideline Update 2012

Intracardiac Devices for Stroke Prevention: The Heart Brain Team

Role of Imaging in Complex LAA Closure Anatomies

Atrial fibrillation (AF), one of the

Technique, Risk, and Benefit. T. Santoso University of Indonesia Medical School,

Afib, Stroke, and DOAC. Albert Luo, MD. Cardiology Lindsey Frischmann, DO. Neurology Xiao Cai, MD. HBS

Show Me the Outcomes!

NUOVI ANTICOAGULANTI NELL ANZIANO: indicazioni e controindicazioni. Mario Cavazza Medicina d Urgenza Pronto Soccorso AOU di Bologna

Individual Therapeutic Selection Of Anti-coagulants And Periprocedural. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

Endocardial LAA Occlusion: Which Device for Which Patient?

Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Stratification and Treatment New Cardiovascular Horizons St. Louis September 19, 2015

INR as a Biomarker: Anticoagulation in Atrial Fib, Heart Failure, and Cardiovascular Disease Daniel Blanchard, MD, FACC, FAHA

Managing the Left Atrial Appendage: Concepts & Controversies

Defining Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation and its management

Indications of Anticoagulants; Which Agent to Use for Your Patient? Marc Carrier MD MSc FRCPC Thrombosis Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Pros and Cons of Individual Agents Based on Large Trial Results: RELY, ROCKET, ARISTOTLE, AVERROES

Modern management of atrial fibrillation, from blood pressure control to anticoagulation

NCVH Birmingham 2013 August 24, Michael S. Bailey, MD Birmingham Heart Clinic

Percutane structurele interventies. Hartoor sluiting (Watchman )

8th Emirates Cardiac Society Congress in collaboration with ACC Middle East Conference Dubai: October Acute Coronary Syndromes

Evaluate Risk of Stroke & Bleeding in AF Patients

An Overview of Mainstream Structural Heart Therapies: TAVR/MitraClip/Watchman

Update on the NOAC s: 2018 Daniel Blanchard, MD, FACC, FAHA

MANAGING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: BEYOND ANTICOAGULATION December 9, 2017

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

NOACs Update PD Dr. Jan Steffel Leitender Arzt, Klinik für Kardiologie Co-Leiter Rhythmologie Universitätsspital Zürich

ANTI-THROMBOTIC THERAPY in NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Transcription:

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Atrial Fibrillation to Prevent Stroke Matthew J. Price MD Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Scripps Clinic La Jolla, CA, USA price.matthew@scrippshealth.org

Risk Factors for Stroke From The Perspective of the 17 th -Century Physician To this variety of apoplexy those are most liable who lead an idle life, who are obese, whose face and hands are constantly livid and whose pulse constantly unequal. Historiae Apoplecticorum Johann Jakob Wepfer, 1658 Apoplexy: Incapacity resulting from a cerebral hemorrhage or stroke.

Prevalence of Antithrombotic Therapies in AF Patients Across the Spectrum of Stroke Risk: Data from the NCDR-PINNACLE Registry N=429,417 <50% of highrisk patients get OACs Hsu JC et al, JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(1):55-6262

Effect of NOACs on Utilization of OAC in Indicated Population: Data from the NCDR- PINNACLE Registry N=655,000 CHA 2 DS 2 VASC 2 Marzec LN et al, JACC 2017; 69(20): 2475-24842484

OACs are Frequently Discontinued 30% 50% Martinez et al, Thromb Haemost 2015

The Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs): Clinical Trial Summary Drug RE-LY Dabigatran 150mg/d ROCKET-AF Rivoraxaban 20mg/day ARISTOTLE Apixaban 5mg bid ENGAGE-AFAF Edoxaban 60mg/day CHADS 2 2.2 3.5 2.1 2.8 TTR, control 67% 58% 66% 68% Ischemic stroke 0.76 (0.60-0.98) 0.94 (0.75-1.17) 0.92 (0.74-1.14) 1.00 (0.83-1.19) Hemorrhagic 0.26 (0.14-0.59 (0.37-0.51 (0.34-0.54 (0.38- stroke 0.49) 0.93) 0.75) 0.77) All-cause 0.88 (0.77-0.85 (0.70-0.89 (0.80-0.92 (0.83- mortality 1.00) 1.02) 0.998) 1.01) Major bleed 0.93 (0.81-1.07) 1.04 (0.90-1.20) 0.69 (0.60-0.80) 0.80 (0.71-0.91) GI bleeding 1.50 (1.19-1.39 (1.19-0.89 (0.70-1.23 (1.02-1.89) 1.61) 1.15) 1.50)

The Bad Actor: The Left Atrial Appendage Why not a local therapy for a local problem? >90% of stroke-causing thrombus originates in the LAA Thromboembolic stroke from AF more debilitating due to size of clots Blackshear J.L. Odell J.A., Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996;61:755-759

A Local Approach to Stroke Prevention in AF is Not A Novel Idea

LAA Occluders Clinically Available (CE Mark or FDA-approved) or Currently Under Investigation U.S.: : Watchman (FDA approved), Amulet (RCT), Wavecrest (RCT soon) OUS: WATCHMAN Amplatzer Amulet LifeTech Occlutech Prolipsis Cardia Acroredis

WATCHMAN LAA Occluder Catheter-based Delivery Available sizes: 21, 24, 27, 30, 33 mm diameter Nitinol Frame 10 active fixation anchors - designed to engage tissue for stability Proximal Face 160 micron membrane PET cap designed to block emboli and promote healing Repositionable & retreivable

Watchman LAA Closure at 1 Year FU

WATCHMAN: FDA Indications for Use The WATCHMAN is indicated to reduce the risk of thromboembolism from the LAA in patients with AF who: Are at increased risk for stroke and systemic embolism based on CHADS2 or CHA2DS2VASc scores and are recommended for anticoagulation Are deemed by their physicians to be suitable for warfarin; and Have an appropriate rationale to seek a nonnonpharmacologic alternative to warfarin, taking into account the safety and effectiveness of the device compared with warfarin.

Prospective U.S. Dataset for WATCHMAN LAA Closure in Warfarin-Eligible Patients Key Trials N Design PROTECT AF (2005-2008) 707 Prospective RCT - 2:1, non-inferiority trial of LAA closure vs. warfarin. CAP (2008-2010) 566 Prospective continuing access registry to gain further information prior to PMA approval. PREVAIL Prospective RCT - 2:1, non-inferiority trial to collect 407 (2010-2012) additional information on the WATCHMAN Device. CAP2 (2012-2014) 579 Prospective continuing access registry prior to PMA approval. Total patients >2,000 ~7,000 Patient-Years of Follow-up Reddy, et al. JAMA. 2014 ;312(19): 1988-1998 1998 Reddy VY et al. Circulation. 2011; 123:417-424424 Holmes, Kar, Price MJ et al., JACC 2014,4(1): 1-11 11

Post-procedural Adjunctive PostPharmacotherapy in the WATCHMAN Clinical Trials Price MJ et al, JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8:1925 8:1925--32 32..

Patient-Level PROTECT AF/PREVAIL Meta PatientMeta-Analysis at 5 Years: WATCHMAN LAAC Compared With Warfarin HR p-value 0.82 0.3 0.96 0.9 Ischemic stroke or SE 1.7 0.08 Hemorrhagic stroke 0.2 0.0022 Ischemic stroke or SE >7 days 1.4 0.3 0.59 0.03 All-cause death 0.73 0.04 Major bleed, all 0.91 0.6 Major bleeding, non procedure-related 0.48 0.0003 Efficacy All stroke or SE CV/unexplained death Favors WATCHMAN 0.01 Reddy et al, JACC 2017 0.1 Favors warfarin 1 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 10

Patient-Level PROTECT AF/PREVAIL Meta PatientMeta-Analysis at 5 Years: WATCHMAN LAAC Compared With Warfarin HR p-value 0.82 0.3 0.96 0.9 Ischemic stroke or SE 1.7 0.08 Hemorrhagic stroke 0.2 0.0022 Ischemic stroke or SE >7 days 1.4 0.3 0.59 0.03 All-cause death 0.73 0.04 Major bleed, all 0.91 0.6 Major bleeding, non procedure-related 0.48 0.0003 Efficacy All stroke or SE CV/unexplained death Favors WATCHMAN 0.01 Reddy et al, JACC 2017 0.1 Favors warfarin 1 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 10

Patient-Level PROTECT AF/PREVAIL Meta PatientMeta-Analysis at 5 Years: WATCHMAN LAAC Compared With Warfarin HR p-value 0.82 0.3 0.96 0.9 Ischemic stroke or SE 1.7 0.08 Hemorrhagic stroke 0.2 0.0022 Ischemic stroke or SE >7 days 1.4 0.3 0.59 0.03 All-cause death 0.73 0.04 Major bleed, all 0.91 0.6 Major bleeding, non procedure-related 0.48 0.0003 Efficacy All stroke or SE CV/unexplained death Favors WATCHMAN 0.01 Reddy et al, JACC 2017 0.1 Favors warfarin 1 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 10

PREVAIL: Rates of the Component Endpoints PREVAIL Subjects Device (n=269) No. of Events Control (n=138) Rate * No. of Events Rate * p-value 2:1 Randomization Primary Efficacy: Stroke/SE/CV Death 37 / 1038.3 3.65 15 / 530.4 2.94 0.47 All Stroke 19 / 1042.4 1.97 7 / 530.4 1.29 0.32 17 / 1043.1 1.68 4 / 533.3 0.73 0.13 2 / 1084.6 0.18 3 / 538.0 0.54 0.23 1 / 1080.6 0.09 0 / 540.9 n/a n/a 18 / 1084.7 1.79 10 / 540.9 1.98 0.76 Ischemic Stroke Hemorrhagic Stroke Systemic Embolism CV/Unexplained Death Yearly stroke rate of 0.73 on warfarin in a population CHA2DS2VASc = 4.1 ±1.2! Wide confidence intervals, small # of patients

Comparative Stroke Rates Between WATCHMAN LAAC and Untreated AF 10 Untreated AF Treated with Warfarin WATCHMAN Arm 8 Ischemic Stroke Risk (events per 100 pt-yrs) 6 4 2 PROTECT AF 1.3 PREVAIL 1.7 WASP 1.5 CAP 1.2 CAP2 2.3 EWOLUTION 1.1 0 1 2 3 4 5

Patient-Level Meta PatientMeta--Analysis: WATCHMAN Associated With Superior Reduction in Disabling Strokes 2.00% Disabling/Fatal Strokes Non-Disabling Strokes 1.50% 55% Reduction 1.00% 0.50% HR 0.45 (0.21 0.94) P=0.03 0.00% WATCHMAN warfarin Disabling Stroke defined as MRS 2

100 90 WATCHMAN Warfarin Free of Major 80 Bleeding Event 70 (%) HR 0.28 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.35] 72% 60 Relative Reduction In Major Bleeding WATCHMAN Arm Warfarin +Aspirin 50 0 Warfarin +Aspirin 7 8 45 46 Price MJ et al, JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8:1925 8:1925--32 32.. Plavix +Aspirin Aspirin 180 6 60

EWOLUTION Registry: Serious Procedure/Device Related Events With Watchman LAA Closure Through 7 Days N=1021 Boersma LV, et al. Eur Heart J. J. 2016.

Outcomes in the WATCHMAN PostPostApproval Experience: N=3822 Post-FDA Approval Experience Complications Pericardial Tamponade Treated with Pericardiocentesis Treated Surgically 39 (1.02%) 24 (0.63%) 12 (0.31%) Resulted in Death Pericardial Effusion No Intervention 3 (0.078%) 11 (0.29%) Procedure-Related Stroke 3 (0.078%) 9 (0.24%) Device Embolization Removed Percutaneously 3 Removed Surgically 6 Death Procedure-Related Mortality Additional Mortality within 7 days Holmes DR, JACC 2017 3 (0.078%) 1 (0.026%)

ASAP-TOO Study Design Prospective, randomized, multi-center, global Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation deemed not suitable for oral anti-coagulation therapy to reduce the risk of stroke. Randomized 2:1 (Watchman vs Control) Considering Group Sequential Design Allows early looks; potential to stop early for benefit 888 subjects at up to 100 global sites Follow-Up* 45 Day with TEE 6,18 month phone visit 12 month with TEE Years 2-5 bi-annually * Brain imaging required at baseline if prior stroke or TIA 2012 MFMER slide-29

Watch-TAVR Severe AS and Atrial Fibrillation N=400 Randomization 1:1 TAVR + Watchman TAVR + Medical management Primary endpoint Death, Stroke and Major Bleeding Investigator initiated, Co-PI Samir Kapadia, Martin Leon Sponsored by BSc Cleveland Clinic

Decision Making Scheme for Stroke Prevention Therapy in AF AF patient at high thromboembolic risk by CHA2DS2VASC score Low bleeding risk, compliant, can afford therapy NOAC (or VKA) Not good candidate for long-term OAC (prior bleed, bleeding risk, on APT, noncompliant, poor VKA candidate & can t afford/take NOAC) but can tolerate short-term therapy Commercial Watchman Absolute or strong contraindication to even short-term OAC ASAP-TOO (WM vs no therapy) Amulet vs. Watchman RCT

The True Measure of Success Just finished FU TEE, told to discontinue warfarin Bruising from warfarin

1 Week Later: Husband Can D/C Warfarin Time Warfarin Time for a Dinner Date With Lots of Leafy Greens!!!

LAA Closure, TAVR, ASD/PFO, Mitral Repair, and More Featuring live case demonstrations, hands-on workshopsand additional satellite symposia! A Pract ical Approach February 7-9, 2018 San Diego Marriott La Jolla La Jolla, California Overview Course Directors Scripps Health s Structural Heart Intervention and Imaging conference is designed to provide a practical, cutting-edge, case-based assessment of the emerging area of structural heart disease intervention and interventional cardiovascular imaging. The expert faculty will include interventionalists, invasive cardiologists, and echocardiographers. Faculty will discuss patient selection, pre-procedural assessment, procedural tips, techniques and challenges (including concurrent imaging) during the performance of the procedures, and conclude with assessment of outcomes and future directions. M atthew J. Price, M D, FACC Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Scripps Clinic/Green Hospital Assistant Professor Scripps Translational Science Institute La Jolla, Califor nia David S. Rubenson, M D, FACC, FASE Director, Cardiac Non-Invasive Laboratory Scripps Clinic La Jolla, Califor nia Contact Us Scripps Conference Services & CME 11025 North Torrey Pines Road, Ste. 200 La Jolla, California 92037 P: 858-652-5400 E: med.edu@scrippshealth.org W: www.scripps.org/conferenceservices