PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

Similar documents
New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

The MAIN-COMPARE Registry

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

Unprotected LM intervention

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

TCTAP Upendra Kaul MD,DM,FACC,FSCAI,FAMS,FCSI

LM stenting - Cypher

BIOFLOW-III an all comers registry with a Sirolimus Eluting Stent: Presentation of 1-Year TLF Data in patients with complex lesions

Unprotected Left Main Stenting: Patient Selection and Recent Experience. Alaide Chieffo. S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, On the behalf of SMART-DATE trial investigators ACC LBCT 2018

Resolute in Bifurcation Lesions: Data from the RESOLUTE Clinical Program

COMPARE Trial Elvin Kedhi Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

SKG Congress, 2015 EVOLVE II. Stephan Windecker

Are Asian Patients Different? - Updates Of Biomatrix Experience In Regional Settings: BEACON II (3 Yr F up) &

Coronary Artery Stenosis. Insight from MAIN-COMPARE Study

Final Clinical and Angiographic Results From a Nationwide Registry of FIREBIRD Sirolimus- Eluting Stent: Firebird In China (FIC) Registry (PI R. Gao)

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Percutaneous Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Disease

FFR-guided Jailed Side Branch Intervention

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Non-LM bifurcation studies of importance in 2011

PCI vs. CABG From BARI to Syntax, Is The Game Over?

eucalimus - First Experience

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

Side Branch Occlusion

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

Medicine OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Coronary Disease (BEST Trial)

Le# main treatment with Stentys stent. Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD Clinica Mediterranea Naples, Italy

A Polymer-Free Dual Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trial Versus Polymer-Based DES.

Left Main and Bifurcation Summit I. Lessons from European LM Studies

Stent Fracture and Longitudinal Compression on CT Angiography between the

STENTYS for Le, Main Sten2ng. Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD Clinica Mediterranea Naples, Italy

Polymer-Free Stent CX - ISAR

Bern-Rotterdam Cohort Study

Clinical Study Age Differences in Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Patients Treated with Drug Eluting Stents at a Tertiary Medical Center

Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are increasingly used in complex patients with a high clinical or lesion-related risk of adverse events.

Supplementary Online Content

What is the Optimal Triple Anti-platelet Therapy Duration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Drug-eluting Stents Implantation?

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:

Alex versus Xience Registry Preliminary report

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

Asian AMI Registry Session The 17 th Joint Meeting of Coronary Revascularization (JCR 2017) Busan, Korea Dec 8 th 2017

EXAMINATION trial. Manel Sabaté Hospital Clínic, Barcelona (On behalf of the Examination Investigators)

Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I

Bifurcation stenting with BVS

Medtronic Symposium The Complex Bifurcation Patient: new insights into stent selection

DECISION-CTO. Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Stenting For Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion. Seung-Jung Park, MD., PhD.

PCI for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis. Jean Fajadet Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France

The Clinical Evaluation of the Medtronic AVE Driver Coronary Stent System

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

Patient. Clinical data Indications: Operation date. Comorbidities: Patient code Birth date: / /

The SORT OUT VI Trial

Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve

BIOFLOW V Comparison of UltraThin Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Polymer with Thin Everolimus- Eluting Durable Polymer Stents

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Biodegradable Polymer coated Drug Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer coated Drug Eluting Stents for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Update from the Tryton IDE study

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

TRIAL UPDATE 1. ISAR TRIPLE SECURITY Trial. Dr Deven Patel Royal Free Hospital

Fractional Flow Reserve: Review of the latest data

NOBORI 2 Trials One Year Clinical Outcomes

eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 47, No. 7, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /06/$32.

Count Down to COMBAT

Approach to Multi Vessel disease with STEMI

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

FFR-guided Complete vs. Culprit Only Revascularization in AMI Patients Ki Hong Choi, MD On Behalf of FRAME-AMI Investigators

IVUS vs FFR Debate: IVUS-Guided PCI

Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea * Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea

Nobori Clinical Studies Up-dates. Gian Battista DANZI, M.D. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Italy

Vascular Intervention // Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent System. Orsiro. Clinically proven. Highly deliverable. Ultrathin 60 μm struts

BIOFREEDOM: Polymer free Biolimus A9 eluting

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE)

TCT mdbuyline.com Clinical Trial Results Summary

Prevention of Coronary Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis

Inspiron Stent. Clinical Research Program. Pedro A. Lemos MD PhD. Heart Institute InCor University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil

1. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse clinical and angiographic outcomes even in acute myocardial Infarction (AMI) patients.

ARMYDA-RECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial

Nine-year clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents for large coronary vessel lesions

Optimal Duration of Clopidogrel Therapy with DES to Reduce Late Coronary Arterial Thrombotic Event. The DES LATE Trial

Final Kissing Ballooning Returns? The analysis of COBIS II registry

DECISION - CTO. optimal Medical Treatment in patients with. Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD, FACC for the DECISION-CTO Study investigators

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 57, No. 12, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /$36.

Left Main Intervention: Will it become standard of care?

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

Transcription:

Promus Element Luncheon Symposium: PROMUS Element Experience In AMC Jung-Min Ahn, MD. University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

PROMUS Element Clinical Programs In Asan Medical Center Left Main Disease Long Lesion ( 28mm) Real World Registry Historical Comparison of RCT of Registry of PROMUS Element Everolimus-Eluting Stent PROMUS Element Everolimus-Eluting Stent PROMUS Element Everolimus-Eluting Stent Promary Endpoint Compared to Promary Endpoint Composite of Death MI Stroke Ischemic driven TVR At 12-months Nobori Biolimus-Eluting Stent Promary Endpoint 9 Months In-segment LL Composite of Death MI TVR at 12-months

Comparison of Platinum Chromium Versus Cobalt Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Real World Practice: Outcomes from the Multicenter Prospective IRIS-DES Registry

Comparison of PtCr-EES and CoCr-EES from IRIS-DES Registry Consecutive PCI patients receiving New DES without a mixture of other DES Prospective Enrollment since 2007 in Korean multicenters DESSIAN Registry 2008.4-2010.5 K-XIENCE Registry 2010.1-2011.12 IRIS- ELEMENT Registry IRIS- NOBORI Registry IRIS- BIOMATRIX Registry IRIS- GENOUS Registry IRIS- PRIME Registry IRIS- RESOLUTE Registry IRIS- CILOTAX Registry CYPHER (N=3,600) XIENCE (N=3,000) PROMUS ELEMENT (N=3,000) NOBORI (N=2,000) BIOMATRIX (N=1,000) GENOUS STEMI (N=1,000) XIENCE-PRIME (N=2,000) RESOLUTE INTEGRITY (N=1,000) CILOTAX (N=1,000) Clinical follow-up at 1-, 6-, and 12-months, and annually up to 5 years

Study Population Inclusion Criteria All consecutive patients who have 1 coronary lesion with a visual estimated DS of >50%. Revascularization was clinically indicated Exclusion Criteria Cardiogenic shock A contraindication to the placement of DESs life expectancy <12 months. PCI with a mixture of different types of DES

Study Endpoints Primary Endpoint Death Myocardial Infarction Target vessel revascularization Secondary End Point Cardiac and non-cardiac deaths. Periprocedural MI (Q wave MI or CK-MB>3UNL) Spontaneous MI (cardiac enzyme elevation). Repeat revascularization: TVR, TLR, & NLR Stent thrombosis: ARC definite or probable ST Stent length and number implanted

Baseline Characteristics PtCr-EES (N=2990) CoCr-EES (N=3081) P value Age 63.8±10.9 63.5±10.8 0.21 Sex, Male 2113 (70.7%) 2079 (67.5%) 0.007 DM 1013 (33.9%) 1026 (33.3%) 0.63 Hypertension 1827 (61.1%) 1922 (62.4%) 0.31 Hyperlipidemia 1088 (36.4%) 1155 (37.5%) 0.38 Smoking 872 (29.2%) 891 (28.9%) 0.83 Previous PCI 319 (10.7%) 454 (14.7%) <0.001 Previous CABG 36 (1.2%) 62 (2.0%) 0.012 Previous MI 150 (5.0%) 159 (5.2%) 0.80 Previous CHF 81 (2.7%) 67 (2.2%) 0.18

Baseline Characteristics PtCr-EES (N=2990) CoCr-EES (N=3081) P value Family History 200 (6.7%) 111 (3.6%) <0.001 Chronic renal failure 95 (3.2%) 105 (3.4%) 0.62 Previous stroke 215 (7.2%) 252 (8.2%) 0.15 Peripheral vascular disease 62 (2.1%) 36 (1.2%) 0.005 Chronic lung disease 61 (2.0%) 92 (3.0%) 0.019 Ejection fraction, % 59.1±10.1 59.5±10.9 0.19 Presentation <0.001 Stable angina 1143 (38.2%) 1277 (41.4%) Unstable angina 1008 (33.7%) 1057 (34.3%) NSTEMI 480 (16.1%) 339 (11.0%) STEMI 359 (12.0%) 408 (13.2%)

Lesion and Procedure Characteristics PtCr-EES (N=2990) CoCr-EES (N=3081) P value Multivessel disease 1470 (49.2%) 1636 (53.1%) 0.002 LMCA disease 213 (7.1%) 323 (10.5%) <0.001 LAD disease 2189 (73.2%) 2336 (75.8%) 0.02 Bifurcation lesion 903 (30.3%) 819 (34.0%) 0.004 Total obstruction 648 (21.7%) 359 (14.7%) <0.001 Restenotic lesion 115 (3.8%) 179 (5.8%) <0.001 Long lesion 1693 (56.7%) 1882 (61.1%) <0.001 Multivessel stenting 772 (35.4) 563 (25.8) <0.001 Total treated lesion number 1.33±0.61 1.37±0.64 0.004 Total stent number 1.620.90 1.82±1.16 <0.001 Total stent length 36.9±23.2 41.7±30.0 <0.001 Average stent diameter, mm 3.17±0.44 3.22±0.44 <0.001

1 - 누적생존함수 Cumulative Incidence, % 0.3 30 Group Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier Curve 2 3 0.4 2-중도절단됨 Primary End Point (Death, MI, or Target Vessel Revascularization) 3- 중도절단됨 PtCr -EES CoCr-EES 0.2 20 Log-Rank P=0.12 0.1 10 15% 15% No. at Risk PtCr-EES CoCr-EES 0.0 0 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 Days Since Procedure 2990 3081 2578 2720 DMITVR_du 900 2503 450 2251

1 - 누적생존함수 Cumulative Incidence, % 0.5 Adjusted Kaplan-Meier Curve Group 2 3 0.4 Primary End Point (Death, MI, or Target Vessel Revascularization) 0.3 30 PtCr -EES CoCr-EES 0.20 HR (95%CI) 1.01 (0.87-1.18), P=0.89 0.110 No. at Risk PtCr-EES CoCr-EES 0.0 0 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 Days Since Procedure 2990 3081 2578 2720 DMITVR_du 900 2503 450 2251

Cumulative Incidence, % 1 - 누적생존함수 0.5 Adjusted Kaplan-Meier Curve 3 0.4 0.3 30 5 Death HR (95%CI) 1.27 (0.91-1.772), p=0.16 4 2-Year Event Rate PtCr -EES CoCr-EES 0.2 20 3 P=0.33 P=0.8 0.1 10 2 1 0 1 Cardiac Death 1.5 1.5 1.5 Non-CD No. at Risk PtCr-EES CoCr-EES 0.0 0 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 Days Since Procedure 2990 3081 2745 2986 fu_du 996 2827 499 2567

Cumulative Incidence, % 1 - 누적생존함수 0.5 Adjusted Kaplan-Meier Curve 0.4 0.3 30 0.2 20 0.1 10 Myocardial Infarction 14 12 10 8 HR (95%CI) 0.89 (0.71-1.11), P=0.27 6 2-Year Event Rate P<0.001 P=0.35 7.4 5 4 2 1.2 1.3 0 Peri-MI Spon-MI 2 3 PtCr -EES CoCr-EES No. at Risk PtCr-EES CoCr-EES 0.0 0 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 2990 3081 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 Days Since Procedure 2600 2761 anymi_du 940 2603 458 2362

1 - 누적생존함수 Cumulative Incidence, % Adjusted Kaplan-Meier Curve 0.4 0.330 1 - 생존함수 Death or MI Group 2 3 PtCr -EES CoCr-EES 0.220 HR (95%CI) 0.95 (0.79-1.13), P=0.54 0.1 10 No. at Risk PtCr-EES CoCr-EES 0.0 0 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 Days Since Procedure 2990 3081 2578 2720 DMI_du 900 2525 449 2229

1 - 누적생존함수 Cumulative Incidence, % Adjusted Kaplan-Meier Curve 0.3 0.2 30 20 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 P=0.30 TVR 1 - 생존함수 2-Year Event Rate P=0.51 HR (95%CI) 1.13 (0.86-1.50), P=0.39 9.1 7.4 4.1 4.3 3.9 P=0.14 5.3 PtCr -EES CoCr-EES Group 2 3 0.1 10 2 0 Any TLR NLR No. at Risk PtCr-EES CoCr-EES 0.0 0 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 TVR_du Days Since Procedure 2990 3081 2719 2931 956 2701 477 2439

% Stent Thrombosis at 24 Months* 1.0 0.8 P=0.33 0.6 0.4 15 (0.5) 7 (0.4) 0.2 0.0 PtCr-EES (N=2990) CoCr-EES (N=3081) * ARC defined definite and probable stent thrombosis

Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions with Drug-Eluting Stent-V: Biolimus A9-Eluting (NOBORI) vs. Everolimuseluting (PROMUS-ELEMENT) Stent A Randomized LONG-DES V Trial

Design Patients requiring PCI with DES for long coronary lesions: Lesion length 25mm (total stent length 28mm) R Biolimus A9-eluting stent: Nobori (n=250) Everolimus-eluting stent: Promus-Element (n=250) 9 months Angiographic follow-up 12 months Clinical follow-up Primary endpoint: In-segment late loss at 9 months angiographic follow-up ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01186120

Inclusion Criteria Clinical Criteria Patients with sap, ACS or inducible ischemia At least 18 years old Angiographic Criteria De novo long coronary lesion suitable for stenting Diameter stenosis >50% by visual estimation Reference vessel size 2.5 mm by visual estimation Lesion length 25 mm by visual estimation (planned total stent length 28mm)

Baseline Characteristics NOBORI (N=245) P-Element (N=255 ) P Value Age 63.06±10.46 63.49±10.63 0.65 Male sex 167 (68.2) 184 (72.2) 0.38 Diabetes mellitus 79 (32.2) 89 (34.9) 0.33 Hypertension 161 (65.7) 154 (60.4) 0.23 Hyperlipidemia 131 (53.5) 145 (56.9) 0.36 Current smoker 63 (25.7) 74 (29.0) 0.42 Previous coronary angioplasty 16 (6.5) 26 (10.2) 0.15 Previous myocardial infarction 6 (2.4) 11 (4.3) 0.32 Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 60.29±7.56 60.23±7.48 0.93

Baseline Characteristics NOBORI (N=245) P-Element (N=255 ) P Value Clinical indication 0.80 Silent ischemia 22 (9.0) 17 (6.7) Stable angina 120 (49.0) 128 (50.2) Unstable angina 68 (27.8) 74 (29.0) Myocardial infarction 35 (14.3) 36 (14.1) Number of Diseased Vessel 0.34 1-vessel 121 (49.4) 115 (45.1) 2-vessel 76 (31.0) 95 (37.3) 3-vessel 48 (19.6) 45 (17.6) multi-vessel disease 124 (50.6) 140 (54.9) 0.37

Lesion Characteristics NOBORI (N=245) P-Element (N=255 ) P Value Target vessel 0.72 Left anterior descending 159 (64.9) 171 (67.1) Left circumflex 33 (13.5) 32 (12.5) Right coronary 53 (21.6) 52 (20.4) TIMI flow grade=0 or 1 25 (10.2) 21 (8.2) 0.46 Bifurcation lesions 79 (32.2) 63 (24.7) 0.04 Thrombus 11 (4.5) 8 (3.1) 0.48 Severe tortuosity 3 (1.2) 4 (1.6) 0.93 Severe Calcification 26 (10.6) 32 (12.5) 0.10 Ulceration 16 (6.5) 16 (6.2) 0.95

Procedural Characteristics NOBORI (N=245) P-Element (N=255 ) P Value No. of stents used at the target lesion 0.20 1 stent 115 (46.9) 117 (45.9) 2 stents 116 (47.3) 110 (43.1) 3 stents 13 (5.3) 26 (10.2) 4 stents 1 (0.4) 2 (0.8) mean 1.59±0.61 1.65±0.69 0.25

Procedural Characteristics Nobori (N=245) P-Element (N=255 ) P Value Stented Length at target, mm 36.06±11.48 39.32±13.82 0.005 Average stent diameter, mm 3.16±0.29 3.18±0.37 0.41 Maximal pressure, atm 12.05±4.01 13.51±3.51 <0.001 Direct stenting 16 (6.5) 12 (4.7) 0.44 Post-additional balloon inflation 190 (77.6) 178 (69.8) 0.06 Intravascular ultrasound guidance 189 (77.1) 188 (73.7) 0.41 Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists 5 (2.0) 6 (2.4) 0.99

QCA Before Procedure NOBORI (N=245) P-Element (N=255 ) P Value Lesion length, mm 29.24±12.17 32.27±13.84 0.016 Reference vessel diameter, mm 3.02±0.46 3.03±0.45 0.80 Minimal luminal diameter, mm 0.85±0.42 0.83±0.42 0.41 Diameter stenosis, % 71.71±13.38 72.61±13.95 0.48

QCA After Procedure Minimal luminal diameter, mm NOBORI (N=245) P-Element (N=255 ) P Value In segment 2.23±0.43 2.21±0.40 0.52 In stent 2.52±0.40 2.52±0.36 0.49 Proximal margin 3.01±0.56 3.07±0.52 0.33 Distal margin 2.26±0.45 2.24±0.43 0.48 Diameter stenosis, % In segment 17.80±9.97 17.12±10.0 0.46 In stent 10.62±8.77 9.99±8.27 0.36 Proximal margin 12.28±9.18 11.15±9.14 0.20 Distal margin 15.18±9.73 14.90±10.20 0.76 Acute gain, mm In segment 1.36±0.53 1.38±0.61 0.88 In stent 1.67±0.51 1.68±0.57 0.86

Study Endpoint Primary Endpoint In-segment late luminal loss At 9 months after the index procedure

Follow-up Analysis Nobori N=245 Promus Element N=255 95 pts refused follow-up 2 pts died 107 pts refused follow-up 1 pts died 9-month angiographic follow-up N=148 (60%) 9-month angiographic follow-up N=147 (58%) 12-month clinical follow-up N=250 (100%) 12-month clinical follow-up N=250 (100%)

QCA at Follow-up NOBORI (N=148) P-Element (N=147) P Value Minimal luminal diameter, mm In segment 2.09±0.47 2.08±0.49 0.86 In stent 2.39±0.48 2.22±0.45 0.009 Proximal margin 2.89±0.60 2.82±0.60 0.33 Distal margin 2.15±0.44 2.22±0.45 0.27 Diameter stenosis, % In segment 21.0±15.4 24.1±14.2 0.10 In stent 14.9±14.1 21.6±15.5 <0.001 Proximal margin 15.5±12.0 16.6±12.4 0.50 Distal margin 17.2±12.8 14.6±9.7 0.07

Primary Endpoint: In-Segment Late Loss at 9 months Nobori : 0.11±0.40 mm P-Element : 0.12±0.39 mm

MACE (death/mi/tvr) at 12 months

Summary In the large, multi-center, prospective cohort study involving real-world patients undergoing PCI with DES, PtCr-EES sh owed the similar clinical efficacy and safety with CoCr-EES. In addition, In the prospective, randomized trial involving patients with long coronary artery lesions, PtCr-EES and BES showed similar 9 month angiographic in-segment late luminal loss.