CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION

Similar documents
Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

Removable appliances

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

ORTHODONTIC INITIAL ASSESSMENT FORM (OIAF) w/ INSTRUCTIONS

Ibelieve the time has come for the general dentists to

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

Definition and History of Orthodontics

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Dental Anatomy and Occlusion

APPENDIX A. MEDICAID ORTHODONTIC INITIAL ASSESSMENT FORM (IAF) You will need this scoresheet and a disposable ruler (or a Boley Gauge)

Research methodology University of Turku, Finland

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

Early Mixed Dentition Period

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

Maxillary Expansion and Protraction in Correction of Midface Retrusion in a Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient

The following standards and procedures apply to the provision of orthodontic services for children in the Medicaid/NJ FamilyCare (NJFC) programs.

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

Treatment of a severe class II division 1 malocclusion with twin-block appliance

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

New Class of Appliance

Treatment of Angle Class III. Department of Paedodontics and Orthodontics Dr. habil. Melinda Madléna associate professor

AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC BOARD

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

#45 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTIVE ERUPTION GUIDANCE -- PREVENTIVE OCCLUSAL DEVELOPMENT

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Fixed appliances II. Dr. Káldy Adrienn, Semmeweis University

ACTIVATOR: SIMPLE YET EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE FOR SKELETAL CLASS II CORRECTION: CASE REPORT... ABSTRACT:...

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

Volume 22 No. 14 September Dentists, Federally Qualified Health Centers and Health Maintenance Organizations For Action

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Preventive Orthodontics

Class II correction with Invisalign - Combo treatments. Carriere Distalizer.

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

Early treatment. Interceptive orthodontics

#27 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTING MALOCCLUSIONS IN THE 5 TO 7 YEAR OLD - CROWDING, ROTATIONS, OVERBITE, AND OVERJET

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

Functional Appliances

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

Orthodontics. Anomalies

Compromised nonsurgical treatment of a patient with a severe Class III malocclusion

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

Angle Class I malocclusion with anterior open bite treated with extraction of permanent teeth

Anterior Open Bite Correction with Invisalign Anterior Extrusion and Posterior Intrusion.

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

S.H. Age: 15 Years 3 Months Diagnosis: Class I Nonextraction Severe crowding, very flat profile. Background:

Mixed Dentition Treatment and Habits Therapy

Congenitally missing mandibular premolars treatment options for space closure. Educational aims and objectives. Expected outcomes

Dzakovich Conclusions

The Herbst Appliance

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

Non-surgical management of skeletal malocclusions: An assessment of 100 cases

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

Comprehensive Orthodontic Diagnosis Align upper and lower arches is not a treatment plan!

Ectopic upper canine associated to ectopic lower second bicuspid. Case report

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

For many years, patients with

Orthodontics-surgical combination therapy for Class III skeletal malocclusion

Evaluation for Severe Physically Handicapping Malocclusion. August 23, 2012

Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment of Gummy Smile with Vertical Maxillary Excess

The America Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons classify occlusion/malocclusion in to the following three categories:

Benefit Changes for Texas Health Steps Orthodontic Dental Services Effective January 1, 2012

SURGICAL - ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION IN AN ADULT PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

Dental Services Referral Form- Orthodontic Clinic

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

6. Timing for orthodontic force

Case Report Orthodontic Treatment of a Mandibular Incisor Extraction Case with Invisalign

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

Sample Case #1. Disclaimer

Correlation Between Naso Labial Angle and Effective Maxillary and Mandibular Lengths in Untreated Class II Patients

MAHP Orthognathic Surgery Guidelines. Medical Policy Statement. Criteria

Appendix 4. Case Summary Template. Social history. Patient (Name and Date of birth): Presenting complaints. History Medical history

Evaluation of maxillary protrusion malocclusion treatment effects with prosth-orthodontic method in old adults

Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences

Class III malocclusions are complex to MANDIBULAR CERVICAL HEADGEAR IN ORTHOPEDIC AND ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS III CASES

Face Adaptation in Orthodontics

6610 NE 181st Street, Suite #1, Kenmore, WA

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

Transcription:

Clinical Associate Prof. Dr. Somchai Satravaha D.D.S. (Hons) from Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok Thailand Diplomate, Thai Board of Orthodontics Zahnärztin für Kieferorthopädie, Baden-Württemberg, Germany Dr.med.dent. (Magna Cum Laude) from Munich, Germany Executive committee member, World Federation of Orthodontists (WFO) 2005-2015 Past president, Thai Association of Orthodontists (ThaAO) Past president of Asian Pacific Orthodontic Society (APOS) Lifetime Achievement Award, Thai Association of Orthodontists 2013 Outstanding Alumni Award, Chulalongkorn University Dent Alumni Association 2014 Honorary member: Association of Philippine Orthodontists Indian Orthodontic Society Ho Chi Minh Association of Orthodontists Honorary Fellow, Asian Pacific Orthodontic Society (APOS) President, Advisory Board of Thai Association of Orthodontists (ThaAO) President, ThaAO s Mobile Orthodontic Unit for Cleft Lip/Palate Patients CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION I, the undersigned, declare that neither I nor any member of my family have a financial arrangement or affiliation with any corporate organization offering financial support or grant monies for this continuing education presentation, nor do I have a financial interest in any commercial product(s) or services I will discuss in this presentation. Non-Aggressive Approach in CLP Treatment They really need Tender Love and Care (TLC) Like all Orthodontic Treatment, objectives are: Function, Esthetics and Stability And Before anything else, we must: Begin with the end in mind Comprehensive Diagnosis, Treatment Planning, Treatment procedure and Retention 1

All CLP cases are unique, difficult and may take long treatment time Problems are both skeletal and dental Patients and parents can get burnt out Most cleft cases exhibit: Sagittal Discrepancy between Maxilla and the Mandible Non-Aggressive Approach in CLP Treatment How can we avoid major surgeries in CLP treatment? Orthognathic surgery Distraction Osteogenesis I would like to propose the use of Class III activator to correct sagittal discrepancy, in CLPs who still have active growth Goals for using Class III Activator Class III Activator Thomas Rakosi. Posterior positioning of the Mandible. Positive Overjet. Maxillary protraction. Positive Overbite To use upper incisors as a Brake as the Mandible continues to grow For me, I feel that : It is easier to treat Bi-maxillary protrusion than Skeletal Class III malocclusions 2

Class III activator of Thomas Rakosi is a Bi-maxillary appliance It is composed of Acrylic part and Wire components, more on their functions: 1. Upper labial pads to stimulate bone formation or enhance growth of the maxilla 2. Lower labial bow, to stabilize the appliance 3. Stop loops located mesial to all the 6-year molars, to stabilize the appliance 4. Tongue guard, to prevent force from a flat and low tongue position By push back the Mandible to a new position New position of the Mandible is designated by: Construction Bite Thickness of a construction bite > Free way space To activate Lat. Pterygoid Muscle Must be done on a patient Activator works on Natural Force TMJ When the Mandible is push backward Check list: Lips closed without muscle strain Retrodiscal tissue Mandibular and Facial Midlines should coincide Condyle Normal Stretching Lateral Pterygoid Muscle Parental approval Rabie et al 3

Horizontal Growth Pattern has good prognosis, contradict to Vertical Growth Pattern Mandible can not be push back too much in Vertical Growth Pattern With a Construction Bite in the mouth, Look at the Profile Change Both pictures were taken on the same day Patient Compliance Patient Instruction Wearing Time - 12 Hours/Day - Mostly Night Is very important! Appointment : every 4-5 weeks Appliance Activation Adjust Appliance Adjustment Selective grinding and controlling of tooth eruption should be kept away from labial surface of lower anterior teeth Add self curing acrylic 4

Cases treated at the ThaAO s Mobile Orthodontic Unit for CLPs ThaAO s Mobile Orthodontic Unit Started November 16, 2010 A 9-year-old boy March 29, 2011 A 9-year-old boy Lateral Profile Large ve Overjet and ve Overbite Obtuse Nasolabial Angel and Protruding lower lip, which esthetically not good March 29, 2011 Positive lip step Class III Activator in situ 1 1 Missing #12, 22 Less protrusion of lower lip Class III Activator 5

Attempt to achieve +ve Overjet and +ve Overbite Class III Activator to push the Mandible backward Lower: 2x4 fixed appliance Age 15 February 22, 2017 Approx. 6 years since the treatment started Class III Activator with a 2x4 FA February 22, 2017 Age 15 February 22, 2017 Approx. 6 years since the treatment started Age 15 Approx. 6 years since the treatment started From here, Only Orthodontic tooth movement is required No major surgery to correct Skeletal Discrepancy was needed or done in this case A 10-year-old Begin 26-4-2011 6

A 10-year-old Ant. X-bite Mixed Dentition A 10-year-old Class III Activator in situ Class III Activator Protrude 3 3 2 2 1 1 Lower lip became less protrusive At Finish Age16 At Finish Age 16 7

At Finish At Finish 6 years later Age 10 Age 16 As for Orthodontic treatment, only 1 minor surgery (alveolar bone graft) was done Conclusion: From the cases presented, it can be concluded that Class III Activator can successfully help correct Skeletal discrepancies Class III Activator might be a viable appliance in 1 st phase of treatment to correct skeletal discrepancy in CLP in conjunction with the use of Removable and/or Fixed appliances in later phase No major surgery was performed on her Approximately 6 years of Treatment time 8

If Your Passion is Orthodontics The AAO Foundation, the charitable arm of the American Association of Orthodontists, provides support to orthodontic education programs and orthodontic research Then pledge, or increase your pledge, to the AAO Foundation 9