Spondyloarthropathies: Disease Perception Limits Market

Similar documents
Gastric Cancer. Introduction

HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE RECOMMENDED MEDICATION REQUEST GUIDELINES

Appendix 1: Frequently Asked Questions

1 P a g e. Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SJIA) (1.3) Patients 2 years of age and older with active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE RECOMMENDED MEDICATION REQUEST GUIDELINES HUMIRA PEDIATRIC

Inflectra Frequently Asked Questions

HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE RECOMMENDED MEDICATION REQUEST GUIDELINES

REFERENCE CODE GDHC496DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE DECEMBER 2014 CIMZIA (CERTOLIZUMAB PEGOL) (RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2023

3. Did the patient show evidence of remission by week 8 of Humira Y N therapy?

Helpline No:

REFERENCE CODE GDHC509DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE DECEMBER 2014 MAVRILIMUMAB (RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS) FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2023

Gender differences in effectiveness of treatment in rheumatic diseases

REFERENCE CODE GDHC501DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE DECEMBER 2014 XELJANZ (TOFACITINIB) (RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2023

Circle Yes or No Y N. [If no, skip to question 7.] 2. Does the patient have a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis? Y N. [If no, skip to question 4.

ACTEMRA/ROACTEMRA (TOCILIZUMAB) (RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2023

2. Is the patient responding to Remicade therapy? Y N

REFERENCE CODE GDHC502DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE DECEMBER 2014 IGURATIMOD/T-614 (RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2023

REFERENCE CODE GDHC504DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE DECEMBER 2014 SARILUMAB (RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS) FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2023

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1114CFR PUBLICATION DATE M AY 2013

2. Has the patient had a response to treatment? Y N. 3. Does the patient have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)? Y N

Ontario Public Drug Programs. Inflectra (infliximab) Frequently Asked Questions

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1170DFR PUBLICATION DATE M AY 2013

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1174DFR PUBLICATION DATE M AY 2013

(minutes for web publishing)

Seronegative Arthritis. Dr Mary Gayed 25 th April 2018

Clinical Policy: Certolizumab (Cimzia) Reference Number: PA.CP.PHAR.247 Effective Date: 01/18 Last Review Date: 08/17 Line of Business: Medicaid

This questionnaire was used both during the face-to-face interviews with the

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Proposed Health Technology Appraisal

Key words: rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, treatment access

Subject: Remicade (Page 1 of 5)

Prior Authorization Conditions for Approval of Enbrel (etanercept) Website Form Submit request via: Fax

REFERENCE CODE GDHC282DFR PUBLICATION DATE OCTOBER 2013 BELVIQ (OBESITY) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Clinical Policy: Secukinumab (Cosentyx) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.165 Effective Date:

REFERENCE CODE GDHC294DFR PUBLICATION DATE NOVEMBER 2013 PROTOPIC (ATOPIC DERMATITIS) FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Clinical Policy: Secukinumab (Cosentyx) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.165 Effective Date:

ETANERCEPT Generic Brand HICL GCN Exception/Other ETANERCEPT ENBREL GUIDELINES FOR USE INITIAL CRITERIA (NOTE: FOR RENEWAL CRITERIA SEE BELOW)

REFERENCE CODE GDHC497DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE DECEMBER 2014 ORENCIA (ABATACEPT) (RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2023

First Name. Specialty: Fax. First Name DOB: Duration:

Proposal relating to the funding of TNF inhibitors (Humira and Enbrel) and gabapentin (Neurontin)

REFERENCE CODE GDHC295DFR PUBLICATION DATE NOVEMBER 2013 ELIDEL (ATOPIC DERMATITIS) FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Rituxan (Rheumatoid Arthritis)

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 26 April 2006

Clinical Policy: Certolizumab (Cimzia) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.167 Effective Date:

Clinical Policy: Certolizumab (Cimzia) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.167 Effective Date:

ADALIMUMAB Generic Brand HICL GCN Exception/Other ADALIMUMAB HUMIRA GUIDELINES FOR USE INITIAL CRITERIA (NOTE: FOR RENEWAL CRITERIA SEE BELOW)

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1062CFR PUBLICATION DATE JUNE 2013 CHRONIC HEART FAILURE - JAPAN DRUG FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Request for Special Authorization Enbrel

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1161DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE SEPTEMBER 2013 MENOMUNE (MENINGOCOCCAL VACCINES) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Psoriatic Arthritis- Second Line Treatments

Coverage Criteria: Express Scripts, Inc. monograph dated 12/15/ months or as otherwise noted by indication

Effective Health Care Program

C. Assess clinical response after the first three months of treatment.

Orencia (Rheumatoid Arthritis)

INFLIXIMAB Remicade (infliximab), Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), Ixifi* (infliximabqbtx), Renflexis (infliximab-abda)

Clinical Policy: Apremilast (Otezla) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.245 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: HIM, Medicaid

REFERENCE CODE GDHC366DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE FEBRUARY 2014 CARIPRAZINE (SCHIZOPHRENIA) FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 3 October 2012

Actemra (Rheumatoid Arthritis)

certolizumab pegol (Cimzia )

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1155DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE SEPTEMBER 2013 NIMENRIX (MENINGOCOCCAL VACCINES) FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Psoriatic Arthritis- Secondary Care

Ustekinumab (Stelara) for psoriatic arthritis second line after disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infections - Pipeline Assessment and Market Forecasts to 2019

Clinical Policy: Etanercept (Enbrel) Reference Number: PA.CP.PHAR.250 Effective Date: 01/18 Last Review Date: 08/17 Line of Business: Medicaid

Regulatory Status FDA- approved indication: Simponi and Simponi ARIA are tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers indicated for the treatment of: (2-3)

Cosentyx. Cosentyx (secukinumab) Description

REFERENCE CODE GDHC357DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE FEBRUARY 2014 CLOZARIL (SCHIZOPHRENIA) FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

2. Does the patient have a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn s? Y N

REFERENCE CODE GDHC361DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE FEBRUARY 2014 INVEGA (SCHIZOPHRENIA) FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Clinical Policy: Certolizumab (Cimzia) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.247 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: HIM, Medicaid

UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs

Drug Therapy Guidelines

Clinical Policy: Ixekizumab (Taltz) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.122 Effective Date:

Kaletra (HIV) Forecast and Market Analysis to GDHC1051DFR/ Published January 2013

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence SCOPE. Rheumatoid arthritis: the management and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults

1. Background: Infliximab is administered parenterally; therefore, it is not covered under retail pharmacy benefits.

Prior Authorization Conditions for Approval of Humira (adalimumab) Website Form Submit request via: Fax

REFERENCE CODE GDHC386DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE M ARCH 2014 GARDASIL (PROPHYLACTIC HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINES) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Dr Tracey Kain. Associate Professor Ed Gane

REFERENCE CODE GDHC296DFR PUBLICATION DATE NOVEMBER 2013 DUPILUMAB (ATOPIC DERMATITIS) FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Clinical Policy: Secukinumab (Cosentyx) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.261 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: HIM, Medicaid

REFERENCE CODE GDHCER046 PUBLICAT ION DATE OCTOBER 2013 DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS - EPIDEMIOLOGY FORECAST TO 2022

Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis second or third line

Ad-Hoc Rheumatology Subcommittee of PTAC meeting held 8 March. (minutes for web publishing)

Effective management of arthritis. Gail Dolan Victoria ACH Liz McIvor Stobhill ACH

Cyltezo (adalimumab-adbm) CG-DRUG-64, CG-DRUG-65

PHARMACY POLICY STATEMENT Ohio Medicaid

REFERENCE CODE GDHC183CFR PUBLICAT ION DATE NOVEM BER 2013 ATOPIC DERMATITIS US DRUG FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

CIMZIA (certolizumab pegol)

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

LUPUZOR (SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AND LUPUS NEPHRITIS) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

From Psoriasis to Psoriatic Arthritis: Incorporating Advances to Individualize Treatment

Pain or stiffness in joints after periods of inactivity or excessive use

REFERENCE CODE GDHCER052 PUBLICAT ION DATE NOVEMBER 2013 DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY - EPIDEMIOLOGY FORECAST TO 2022

Cyclokat (Dry Eye Syndrome)

Horizon Scanning Centre November Secukinumab for active and progressive psoriatic arthritis. SUMMARY NIHR HSC ID: 5330

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1087DFR PUBLICATION DATE JUNE 2013

Drug Class Prior Authorization Criteria Therapeutic Agents in Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases

Transcription:

Spondyloarthropathies: Disease Perception Limits Market Psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis form part of the group of diseases known as the spondyloarthropathies. Psoriatic arthritis is a form of inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis, whilst ankylosing spondylitis causes arthritis of the spine and sacroiliac joints. Moderate-severe disease for both patient groups is frequently treated with similar therapies, including biologics. Scope Analysis of the results of a survey of 180 rheumatologists and 180 dermatologists supported by key opinion leader interviews. Overview of epidemiology and patient segmentation in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Detailed presentation and referral information, including the involvement of various physician specialties from symptom onset to therapy management. Treatment trees for each of the seven major markets in both psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Research and analysis highlights Physician education is a major unmet need in both psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, with the targeting of primary care physicians identified as a crucial for improving low diagnosis rates. Physicians surveyed estimate low diagnosis rates, 50% in psoriatic arthritis and 60% ankylosing spondylitis. Systemic immunosuppressants are useful across all psoriatic arthritis severities, however the safety of long term methotrexate use is questioned in psoriatic arthritis patients, who are vulnerable to liver damage, creating an opportunity for biologics. Fear of disfigurement by psoriasis drives continued use of topical therapies and high compliance. Rheumatologists provide the long-term care for 76% of ankylosing spondylitis patients. The late development of radiographic sacroiliitis and physicians' confusion of the disease with non-specific back pain contribute to a time to diagnosis of more than 3 years. Increased use of MRI will improve diagnosis rates and speed time to therapy initiation.

Key reasons to purchase this research Gain competitive advantage with one of the most extensive primary research reports available in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis Identify with prescribers more effectively, through an understanding of referral patterns based on data-rich treatment algorithms Validate new product forecasting based on diagnosis rates and treatment by patient segmentation and drug class

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY o Scope of the analysis o Datamonitor insight into the spondyloarthropathies market o Contributing experts o Related reports o Upcoming related reports INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE o Coverage of the Stakeholder Insight survey Treatment trees Epidemiology Diagnosis presentation and referral options Treatment trends Improving treatment outcomes o Assumptions and caveats Physician demographics COUNTRY TREATMENT TREES o Introduction to treatment trees o Psoriatic arthritis US Japan France Germany Italy Spain UK o Ankylosing spondylitis US Japan France Germany Italy Spain UK EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATIENT SEGMENTATION o Genetic basis of spondyloarthropathies

Recent research indicates that three genes play a role in ankylosing spondylitis HLA-B27 importance to psoriatic arthritis yet to be defined o Psoriatic arthritis prevalence US Japan France Germany Italy Spain UK o Patient segmentation for psoriatic arthritis Subgroups within psoriatic arthritis complicate segmentation Psoriatic arthritis most often affects middle-aged Caucasians with pre-existing psoriasis o Ankylosing spondylitis prevalence Etiology and symptoms Datamonitor estimates over 1 million ankylosing spondylitis patients in the seven major markets in 2008 US Japan France Germany Spain Italy UK o Patient segmentation for ankylosing spondylitis Nearly all ankylosing spondylitis patients experience joint or eye involvement DIAGNOSIS, PRESENTATION AND REFERRAL OPTIONS o Psoriatic arthritis Presentation and diagnosis Diagnosed versus undiagnosed patient populations Time to diagnosis Care pathways from presentation to therapy maintenance o Ankylosing spondylitis Presentation and diagnosis Diagnosed versus undiagnosed patient populations Time to diagnosis Care pathways from presentation to therapy maintenance TREATMENT OPTIONS AND TRENDS

o Overview of treatment guidelines for psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis Latest consensus guidelines for psoriatic arthritis released in October 2008 ASAS and EULAR have collaborated to produce international guidelines for the management of ankylosing spondylitis o Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy use Pharmacological treatment is favored in the management of psoriatic arthritis Pharmacological treatment is essential to control pain and inflammation experienced by ankylosing spondylitis patients Analgesics NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors Corticosteroids Systemic immunosuppressants Traditional DMARDs Anti-TNFs Additional therapies for psoriatic arthritis Patients have ample support; physicians must implement new guidelines IMPROVING TREATMENT OUTCOMES o Treatment satisfaction in psoriatic arthritis Japanese dermatologists show dissatisfaction with current treatments, but satisfaction is otherwise moderate o Unmet needs in psoriatic arthritis Physicians treating psoriatic arthritis prioritize improved disease modification o Treatment satisfaction in ankylosing spondylitis Rheumatologists in Japan show dissatisfaction with current treatments, although satisfaction is moderate across the seven major markets o Unmet needs in ankylosing spondylitis Improved disease modification is seen as critical to the progression of ankylosing spondylitis treatment BIBLIOGRAPHY o Journal papers o Websites APPENDIX A o Physician research methodology o Contributing experts

APPENDIX B TABLES o The survey questionnaire o Table: Rheumatologists surveyed regarding psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, 2008 o Table: Dermatologists surveyed regarding psoriatic arthritis, 2008 o Table: Psoriatic arthritis prevalence across the seven major o Table: Psoriatic arthritis population across the seven major markets, split by disease severity, (%), 2008 o Table: The 2006 ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) system summary o Table: Ankylosing spondylitis population across the seven major markets, 2008 o Table: Key ankylosing spondylitis prevalence studies in selected countries, 1979 2008 o Table: Ankylosing spondylitis population across the seven major markets, split by disease severity (%), 2008 o Table: Mean percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients suffering from the disease at each additional anatomical site across the seven major o Table: Psoriatic arthritis patients initially experiencing psoriasis versus systemic joint inflammation in the seven major markets (%), 2008 o Table: Mean percentage of psoriatic arthritis sufferers who are diagnosed versus undiagnosed in the seven major o Table: Total length of time from onset of symptoms to psoriatic arthritis diagnosis across the seven major o Table: Presentation, diagnosis, treatment initiation, and long-term management of psoriatic arthritis by physician type across the seven major markets (%), 2008 o Table: Mean percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients initially presenting to each physician type across the seven major o Table: Mean percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients diagnosed by each physician type across the seven major o Table: Mean percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients receiving treatment initiation by each physician type, across the seven major o Table: Mean percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients receiving long-term management by each physician type across the seven major o Table: Total length of time from onset of symptoms to ankylosing spondylitis diagnosis across the seven major o Table: Presentation, diagnosis, treatment initiation, and long-term management of ankylosing spondylitis by physician type across the seven major

o Table: Mean percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients presenting to each physician type across the seven major o Table: Mean percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients diagnosed by each physician type across the seven major o Table: Mean percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients receiving treatment initiation by each physician type across the seven major o Table: Mean percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients receiving longterm management by each physician type across the seven major markets, 2008 o Table: Percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients receiving pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy, by disease severity across the seven major o Table: Percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients receiving pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy, by disease severity across the seven major o Table: Analgesic (i.e., acetaminophen) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity, across the seven major o Table: Analgesic (i.e., acetaminophen) class usage in ankylosing spondylitis by disease severity, across the seven major o Table: NSAID (i.e., naproxen, ibuprofen) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity across the seven major o Table: COX-2 inhibitor (i.e., celecoxib) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity, across the seven major o Table: NSAID (i.e., naproxen, ibuprofen) class usage in ankylosing spondylitis by disease severity across the seven major o Table: COX-2 inhibitor (i.e., celecoxib) class usage in ankylosing spondylitis by disease severity across the seven major o Table: Systemic corticosteroid (oral, intravenous, intramuscular and intraarticular) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity across the seven major o Table: Systemic corticosteroid (oral, intravenous, intramuscular and intraarticular) class usage in ankylosing spondylitis by disease severity across the seven major o Table: Systemic immunosuppressant (i.e. azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity across the seven major o Table: Systemic immunosuppressant (i.e. methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) class usage in ankylosing spondylitis by disease severity, across the seven major o Table: Traditional DMARD (i.e., leflunomide, sulfasalazine) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity, across the seven major markets, 2008 TypeTableTitleHere o Table: Traditional DMARD (i.e., leflunomide, sulfasalazine) class usage in psoriatic ankylosing spondylitis by disease severity across the seven major

FIGURES o Table: Anti-TNF (i.e., etanercept, infliximab) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity across the seven major TypeTableTitleHere o Table: Anti-TNF (i.e., etanercept, infliximab) class usage in ankylosing spondylitis by disease severity across the seven major o Table: Topical NSAID (i.e., diclofenac) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity across the seven major TypeTableTitleHere o Table: Topical vitamin derivative (i.e. calcipotriol) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity across the seven major TypeTableTitleHere o Table: Topical corticosteroid class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity across the seven major TypeTableTitleHere o Table: Topical immunomodulator (i.e., pimecrolimus, tacrolimus) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity across the seven major o Table: Cytotoxic agent (i.e., ciclosporin, cyclophosphamide) class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity, across the seven major markets, 2008 o Figure: US psoriatic arthritis patient population split by physicianestimated o Figure: Japan psoriatic arthritis patient population split by physicianestimated o Figure: France psoriatic arthritis patient population split by physicianestimated o Figure: Germany psoriatic arthritis patient population split by physicianestimated o Figure: Italy psoriatic arthritis patient population split by physicianestimated o Figure: Spain psoriatic arthritis patient population split by physicianestimated o Figure: UK psoriatic arthritis patient population split by physicianestimated diagnoses, disease severity, drug- treated population, and drugclass o Figure: US ankylosing spondylitis patient population split by physicianestimated

o Figure: Japan ankylosing spondylitis patient population split by physicianestimated o Figure: France ankylosing spondylitis patient population split by physician-estimated diagnoses, disease severity, drug-treated population, and drug-class o Figure: Germany ankylosing spondylitis patient population split by physician-estimated diagnoses, disease severity, drug-treated population, and drug-class o Figure: Italy ankylosing spondylitis patient population split by physicianestimated o Figure: Spain ankylosing spondylitis patient population split by physicianestimated o Figure: UK ankylosing spondylitis patient population split by physicianestimated o Figure: Total psoriatic arthritis population in the seven major markets, split by disease severity, 2008 o Figure: Total ankylosing spondylitis population in the seven major markets, split by disease severity, 2008 o Figure: Mean percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients suffering from the disease at each additional anatomical site across the seven major o Figure: Psoriatic arthritis patients initially experiencing psoriasis versus systemic joint inflammation in the seven major markets (%), 2008 o Figure: Mean percentage of psoriatic arthritis sufferers who are diagnosed versus undiagnosed in the seven major o Figure: Total length of time from onset of symptoms to psoriatic arthritis diagnosis across the seven major o Figure: Presentation, diagnosis, treatment initiation, and long-term management of psoriatic arthritis by physician type across the seven major o Figure: Mean percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients initially presenting to each physician type across the seven major o Figure: Mean percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients diagnosed by each physician type across the seven major o Figure: Mean percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients receiving treatment initiation by each physician type across the seven major o Figure: Mean percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients receiving long-term management by each physician type across the seven major o Figure: Ankylosing spondylitis diagnosis rates across the seven major o Figure: Total length of time from onset of symptoms to ankylosing spondylitis diagnosis across the seven major

o Figure: Presentation, diagnosis, treatment initiation, and long-term management of ankylosing spondylitis by physician type across the seven major o Figure: Mean percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients presenting to each physician type across the seven major o Figure: Mean percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients diagnosed by each physician type across the seven major o Figure: Mean percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients receiving treatment initiation by each physician type across the seven major o Figure: Mean percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients receiving long-term management by each physician type across the seven major o Figure: Rheumatologists: percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients receiving pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy, by disease severity across the seven major o Figure: Dermatologists: percentage of psoriatic arthritis patients receiving pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy, by disease severity across the seven major o Figure: Rheumatologists: drug class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity across the seven major o Figure: Dermatologists: drug class usage in psoriatic arthritis by disease severity across the seven major o Figure: Percentage of ankylosing spondylitis patients receiving pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy, by disease severity across the seven major o Figure: Drug class usage in ankylosing spondylitis by disease severity across the seven major o Figure: Rheumatologists and dermatologists satisfaction with currently available psoriatic arthritis treatments across the seven major markets, 2008 o Figure: Priority rating allocated by rheumatologists to unmet needs in the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis, 2008 o Figure: Rheumatologists satisfaction with currently available ankylosing spondylitis treatments across the seven major o Figure: Priority rating allocated by rheumatologists to unmet needs in the pharmacological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis, 2008