Survey patients for Sx, signs of AF. Establish AF Dx. Evaluate & Tx underlying heart disease/other causes. Assess adequacy of rate or rhythm control

Similar documents
Edoxaban. Direct Xa inhibitor Direct thrombin inhibitor Direct Xa inhibitor Direct Xa inhibitor

Atrial Fibrillation and the NOAC s. John Raymond MS, PA-C, MHP February 10, 2018

Evaluate Risk of Stroke & Bleeding in AF Patients

Tim Brown, PharmD, BCACP, FASHP Director of Clinical Pharmacotherapy, Akron General Medical Center for Family Medicine Professor, Northeast Ohio

ADC Slides for Presentation 02/10/2017

DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS: WHEN TO USE, WHICH TO CHOOSE AND MANAGEMENT OF BLEEDING

6 th ACC-SHA Joint Meeting Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation JIR-PING BOEY, DEPARTMENT OF HAEMATOLOGY, FLINDERS MEDICAL CENTRE FEBRUARY 2016

NEW/NOVEL ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS (NOACS): COMPARISON AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Stratificazione del rischio, corretto bilancio tra ischemia e bleeding: il beneficio clinico netto

Afib, Stroke, and DOAC. Albert Luo, MD. Cardiology Lindsey Frischmann, DO. Neurology Xiao Cai, MD. HBS

DOAC the story so far... Dr GM Benson Director NI Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre BHSCT

DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS

PRESENTATION TITLE. Case Studies

What s new with DOACs? Defining place in therapy for edoxaban &

ESC Congress 2012, Munich

NOACs in AF. Dr Colin Edwards Auckland Heart Group and Waitemata DHB. Dr Fiona Stewart Auckland Heart Group and Auckland DHB

Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting 경북대의전원내과조용근

Preventing Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: USING THE EVIDENCE

Southern Trust Anticoagulant Team

NOACs in AF. Dr Fiona Stewart. Auckland Heart Group and Auckland DHB

Anticoagulation Therapy in LTC

New Antithrombotic Agents

Aims. AF and Stroke risk Guidance re anticoagulation Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in non-valvular AF (NVAF) Practical Issues Patient Case Studies

Prepared by Pfizer-BMS alliance in response to an unsolicited request Not for further distribution

New Antithrombotic Agents DISCLOSURE

AF review. Petr Polasek

NOACS/DOACS*: COMPARISON AND FREQUENTLY-ASKED QUESTIONS

New Oral Anticoagulants in treatment of VTE, PE DR.AMR HANAFY (LECTURER OF CARDIOLOGY ) ASWAN UNIVERSITY

The Role of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: What You Need to Know Now. Bradley A. Hardin, MD Richard F.

AF in Asian: which NOAC to choose for particular patient and at what dose? DEJIA HUANG West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

HERTFORDSHIRE MEDICINES MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (HMMC) DABIGATRAN RECOMMENDED What it is Indications Date decision last revised

The Use of New Anticoagulants in the Elderly NOACs, DOACs,TOACs,TSOACs.

NHS Lanarkshire Guidance on Anticoagulant treatment for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Initiation of OAC for Atrial Fibrillation Order Set

KCS Congress: Impact through collaboration

Newer Anti-Anginal Agents and Anticoagulants

Dr Mammen Ninan GPwSI in Cardiology

Nibal R. Chamoun, Pharm.D., BCPS Clinical Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice at the Lebanese American University Clinical Pharmacy Coordinator

MODULE 1: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Benjamin Bell, MD, FRCPC

Antithrombotics in Stroke management

NUOVI ANTICOAGULANTI NELL ANZIANO: indicazioni e controindicazioni. Mario Cavazza Medicina d Urgenza Pronto Soccorso AOU di Bologna

Joshua D. Lenchus, DO, RPh, FACP, SFHM Associate Professor of Medicine and Anesthesiology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Appendix IV - Prescribing Guidance for Apixaban

Utilizing Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation Related Stroke Prevention

Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Stratification and Treatment New Cardiovascular Horizons St. Louis September 19, 2015

Updates in Stroke Management. Jessica A Starr, PharmD, FCCP, BCPS Associate Clinical Professor Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy

Oral Anticoagulation Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Cost and Prevalence of A fib. Atrial Fibrillation: Guideline Directed Treatment. Prevalence of A Fib. Risk Factors for A Fib. Risk Factors for A Fib

Individual Therapeutic Selection Of Anti-coagulants And Periprocedural. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

Updates in Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism

WMC PHARMACY ANTICOAGULATION PROTOCOL Current Revision: July 2017 GENERAL ORDER PROCESSING AND MANAGEMENT

Novel Anticoagulants PHYSICIANS UPDATE 2014

Indications of Anticoagulants; Which Agent to Use for Your Patient? Marc Carrier MD MSc FRCPC Thrombosis Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Apixaban for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis

Reviews. Practical Considerations for Using Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Engage AF-TIMI 48. Edoxaban in AF: What can we expect? Cardiology Update John Camm. St. George s University of London United Kingdom

Asif Serajian DO FACC FSCAI

Practical Considerations for Using Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Professional Practice Minutes December 7, 2016

NEW APPROACHES AND NEW ANTICOAGULANTS FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Atrial Fibrillation Implementation challenges. Lesley Edgar Ross Maconachie

Novel Anticoagulants: Emerging Evidence

PCI in Patients with AF Optimizing Oral Anticoagulation Regimen

RETROSPECTIVE CLAIMS DATABASE STUDIES OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS (DOACS) FOR STROKE PREVENTION IN NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

Direct Oral Anticoagulants An Update

Anticoagulation Beyond Coumadin

NeuroPI Case Study: Anticoagulant Therapy

Scoring Systems in AF 8/10/2016. Strategies in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Strokes. Overview

Clinical issues which drug for which patient

Atrial Fibrillation. 2 nd Annual National Hospitalist Conference San Antonio, TX September 7, 2018

Stepheny Sumrall, FNP, AGACNP Cardiovascular Clinic of Hattiesburg

Model guidance for prescribers

Appendix C Factors to consider when choosing between anticoagulant options and FAQs

Secondary Preven-on of Thromboembolic Stroke: Clinical Data and Recommenda-ons from the ESC Atrial Fibrilla-on Guideline Update 2012

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: REVISITING CONTROVERSIES IN AN ERA OF INNOVATION

Current Guideline for AF Treatment. Young Keun On, MD, PhD, FHRS Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

Updates in Management of Venous Thromboembolic Disease

New Oral Anticoagulants

Drug Class Monograph

MY APPROACH to the use of NOACs for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation Lip, Gregory

Arrhythmias and Clinical EP Contemporary Management of Anticoagulant Therapies

What s New in the AF Guidelines

Følgende dias er fremlagt ved DCS / DTS Fællesmøde 13. januar 2011 og alle rettigheder tilhører foredragsholderen. Gengivelse må kun foretages ved

심방세동과최신항응고요법 RACE II AFFIRM 항응고치료는왜중요한가? Rhythm control. Rate control. Anticoagulation 남기병 서울아산병원내과. Clinical Impact of Atrial Fibrillation

PRACTICAL MANAGEMENT OF NOAC s December 8,

Half Moon Bay Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. Dr. Roger A. Winkle MD. Silicon Valley Cardiology, PAMF, Sutter Health Sequoia Hospital

Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: A Cause or a Consequence

AF stroke prevention in the Canadian context

controversies in anticoagulation: optimizing outcome for atrial fibrillation

Oral Anticoagulants Update. Elizabeth Renner, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP, CACP Outpatient Cardiology and Anticoagulation

2012 focussed update of the ESC Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Episode 88 DOACs Part 1: Use & Misuse, DVT & Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department

A Patient Unsuitable for VKA Treatment

Volume 7; Number 16 October 2013

Old and New Anticoagulants For Stroke Prevention Benefits and Risks

Spontaneous Atrial Fibrillation and Noacs and Reversal agents

Transcription:

Suggested General Approach to Managing Atrial Fibrillation Survey patients for Sx, signs of AF Establish AF Dx ECG Holter Event monitor Implanted device (pacer) Determine & Tx stroke risk (CHA 2 DS 2 VASc) Evaluate & Tx underlying heart disease/other causes Assess adequacy of rate or rhythm control Reassess during follow-up

CHA 2 DS 2 VASc Score For AF Stroke Stratification C H A D S Risk Factor Congestive Heart Failure History of heart failure; significant LV dysfunction +1 Hypertension History of hypertension, controlled or not +1 Age 75 years +2 Diabetes Diabetes +1 Stroke Prior stroke, TIA, embolism +2 If Yes add: V A Sc Vascular disease Coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, aorta atherosclerosis Age 65-74 years +1 Sex category Women +1 +1 Total Score:

Stroke Risk Stratification in AF CHADS 2 Risk Factor Score Cardiac failure 1 Hypertension 1 Age 75 years 1 Diabetes 1 Stroke 2 CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc Risk Factor Score Cardiac failure 1 Hypertension 1 Age 75 years 2 Diabetes 1 Stroke 2 Vascular disease (MI, peripheral arterial disease, aortic atherosclerosis) 1 Age 65-74 years 1 Sex category (female) 1 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Annual Risk of Ischemic Stroke (%) CHADS 2 CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Total Score HTN = hypertension; MI = myocardial infarction. Lip GY, et al. Am J Med. 2010;123(6):484-488. Camm AJ, et al. Eur Heart J. 2010:31;2369-2429.

What factors increase bleeding risk from anticoagulation? H A S B L E D Risk Factor Hypertension Abnormal renal/liver function Requiring 2 antihypertensive meds or poorly controlled Serum creatinine >2.3 mg/dl and/or liver function studies >3 x normal or known renal/liver disease (1 point each) Stroke Stroke, TIA or arterial embolism history +1 Bleeding History of bleeding requiring hospitalization +1 Labile INH Highly variable INRs with time-in-therapeuticrange (TTR) <60% Elderly Age >65 years +1 Drugs Antiplatelet medications or alcohol abuse (1 point each) If Yes add: +1 +1 or 2 +1 +1 or 2 Total Score:

HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score Average risk of major bleed on warfarin ~2%/yr, but Letter H A S B L E D Clinical Characteristic* HTN ( 2 Rx; uncontrolled) 1 Abnormal renal (>2.3 mg/dl) and/or liver 1 or 2 function ( 3x) (1 point each) Stroke/TIA/embolism 1 Bleeding Hospitalization 1 Labile INRs (TTR<60%) 1 Elderly (age >65 years) Drugs (antiplatelet) or alcohol abuse (1 point each) Score 1 1 or 2 Maximum 9 points % Major Bleeding Events/yr 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 HAS-BLED Study (n=3071) Low Intermediate High bleed risk 0 1 2 3 4 5 HAS-BLED Score Fatal or clinically overt bleed with Hb decrease 2 g/dl, and/or 2u transfusion or bleed in critical anatomic site excluding brain Camm AJ, et al. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(19):2369-2429. Pisters R. Chest. 2010;138:1093-1100. Lip GY J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:173-80, Olesen JB. J Thromb Haemost 2011;9:1460-7.

Class I In patients with nonvalvular AF the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is recommended for assessment of stroke risk (Level of Evidence B). For patients with prior stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of 2, oral anticoagulants are recommended. Class IIa For patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of 0 it is reasonable to omit antithrombotic therapy (Level of Evidence B) Alpert JS et al. Circulation 2014;129.. Class IIb For patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of 1 no anthrombotic treatment or treatment with an oral anticoagulant or aspirin may be considered (Level of Evidence C).

Camm AJ et al. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2719-47. Anticoagulant Anticoagulant Therapy Therapy Selection Selection && Management Management Atrial fibrillation Valvular AF* Yes Yes No (ie, non-valvular AF) <65 years and lone AF (including females) * Includes rheumatic valvular AF, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, prosthetic valves ** Other than gender as sole risk No Assess risk of stroke (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score) 0 1** 2 Oral anticoagulant therapy Assess bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score) Consider patient values and preferences ASA No antithrombotic therapy NOAC Warfarin

Warfarin Dosing Most patients start therapy at 5 mg daily and adjust according to INR Sensitive patients start therapy at 1-2.5 mg daily and adjust according to INR Novel Oral Anticoagulant Dosing Drug Recommended Dose Adjustment Apixaban 5 mg po bid Decrease to 2.5 mg bid if 2 of following: age 80 yrs, weight 60 kg or serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dl Dabigatran 150 mg bid Decrease to 75 mg bid if estimated CrCl* 15-30 ml/min Edoxaban 60 mg qd Decrease to 30 mg qd if CrCl 15-50 ml/min; Rivaroxaban 20 mg qd with meal Decrease to 15 mg qd if CrCl 15-50 ml/min Comments May be used in hemodialysis patients Estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) is calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation: Men: (140-age) * wt in kg/(72 x serum creatinine in mg/dl) = glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in ml/min Women: GFR (men) * 0.85 Contraindicated if CrCl <15 ml/min Contraindicated if CrCl <15 ml/min or >95 ml/min Contraindicated if CrCl <15 ml/min

INR Goal 2-3 Dosing adjustment INR <1.5 Consider one-time booster dose of 1 ½ -2 x daily maintenance dose Continue prior maintenance dose if INR low because of missed dose(s) If persistent, increase maintenance dose by 10-20% INR 1.5-1.7 Consider one-time booster dose of 1 ½ - 2 x daily maintenance dose Continue prior maintenance dose if INR low because of missed dose(s) If persistent, increase maintenance dose by 5-15% INR 1.8-1.9 Consider one-time booster dose of 1 ½ -2x daily maintenance dose Continue prior maintenance dose if INR low because of missed dose(s) If persistent, increase maintenance dose by 5-10% INR 2-3 Suggested Warfarin Dose Adjustments Based on INR INR 3.1-3.2 Continue prior maintenance dose if caused by transient factor (EtOH) If persistent, decrease maintenance dose by 5-10% INR 3.3-3.4 Continue prior maintenance dose if caused by transient problem (EtOH) Consider one-time reduction to ½ dose or hold 1 dose If persistent, decrease maintenance dose by 5-10% INR 3.5-3.9 Continue prior maintenance dose if caused by transient problem (EtOH) Consider one-time hold of 1 dose If persistent, decrease maintenance dose by 5-15% INR 4 but no bleeding INR 5 but no bleeding Continue prior maintenance dose if caused by transient problem (EtOH) Consider minidose oral Vitamin K (phytonadione ¼ of 5 mg tablet or ~1 mg) If persistent, decrease maintenance dose by 5-15% Hold warfarin & repeat INR q24 hours Consider oral Vitamin K (phytonadione ¼ - ½ of 5 mg tablet or ~1-2.5 mg)

Drug Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Mechanism of action Reversible direct thrombin inhibitor Reversible direct factor Xa inhibitors T 1/2 (hrs) 14-17 5-9 12 6-12 Renal excretion Characteristics of New Oral Anticoagulants Bioavailability 6.5% >95% with food; 66% without 66% 62% with food; 45% without Peak activity (hrs) 2-3 2.5-4 1-3 1-1.5 Regimen Special concerns Pro-drug, GI Sx Characteristics of Protein binding 35% >90% 87% 40-59% 75-150 mg BID 1 15-20 mg QD 2 2.5-5 mg BID 3 30-60 mg QD 4 ~80% 36%-45% 25%-30% 35% Dose with food Approved in hemodialysis Avoid if CrCl >95 ml/min Potential for drug interactions P-glycoprotein substrate (P-gp) CYP3A4, CYP2J2 & P-gp substrate CYP3A4, CYP1A2, CYP2J1 & P-gp substrate CYP3A4 & P-gp substrate 1: 75 mg if CrCl 15-30; 2: 15 mg if CrCl 15-50; 3: 2.5 mg if 2/3 of age 80 yrs wt 60 kg creat 1.5 mg/dl 4: 30 mg if CrCl 15-50 & avoid if >95ml/min Dialyzable if low %protein binding Usman MH, et al. Curr Treat Cardiovasc Med. 2008;10(5):388-397. Piccini JP, et al. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010;25(4):312-320; DeLoughery TG. Am J Hematol 2011;86:586-90.

Summary of Major Trials of Warfarin vs Novel Oral Anticoagulant Agents Kovacs RJ. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1340-60.

Summary of Major Trials of Anti- Thrombotic Drugs for Nonvalvular AF (1/5) SOE = significance of effect Lopes RD et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Comparative effectiveness review No 123. AHRQ Publication No 13-EHC113-EF. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: August 2013. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ reports/final.cfm

Summary of Major Trials of Anti- Thrombotic Drugs for Nonvalvular AF (2/5) SOE = significance of effect Lopes RD et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Comparative effectiveness review No 123. AHRQ Publication No 13-EHC113-EF. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: August 2013. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ reports/final.cfm

Summary of Major Trials of Anti- Thrombotic Drugs for Nonvalvular AF (3/5) SOE = significance of effect Lopes RD et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Comparative effectiveness review No 123. AHRQ Publication No 13-EHC113-EF. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: August 2013. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ reports/final.cfm

Summary of Major Trials of Anti- Thrombotic Drugs for Nonvalvular AF (4/5) SOE = significance of effect Lopes RD et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Comparative effectiveness review No 123. AHRQ Publication No 13-EHC113-EF. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: August 2013. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ reports/final.cfm

Summary of Major Trials of Anti- Thrombotic Drugs for Nonvalvular AF (5/5) SOE = significance of effect Lopes RD et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Comparative effectiveness review No 123. AHRQ Publication No 13-EHC113-EF. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: August 2013. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm

Drug Interaction Effect on NOAC metabolism Drug Metabolism Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Digoxin P-GP competition No effect No effect No effect No effect Verapamil Diltiazem Potentially Important Drug-Drug Interactions with NOACs P-GP competition + weak CYP3A4 inhibition P-GP competition + weak CYP3A4 inhibition +12-180% Minor effect Unknown +53% No effect Minor effect +40% Unknown Quinidine P-GP competition +50% +50% Unknown +80% Amiodarone P-GP competition +12-60% Minor effect Unknown No effect Dronedarone Ketoconazole & other azoles Fluconazole HIV protease inhibitors Rifampin, St Johns wort; carbamazapine, phenytoin, phenobarbital P-GP and CYP3A4 inhibition P-GP, BCRP competition, CYP3A4 competition Moderate CYP3A4 competition P-GP, BCRP competition & inducer, CYP3A4 inhibition P-BP, BCRP & CYP3A4/CYP2J2 inducers +70-100% Unknown Unknown +85% +140-150% +160% +100% Unknown Unknown +42% Unknown Unknown Unknown +153% Strong increase Unknown -66% -50% -54% -35% Adapted after Heidbuchel H, et al. Europace 2013;15:625-651.

Switching Between Oral Anticoagulants Converting Warfarin to NOAC Wait for INR < 2-2.5 (< 3 for rivaroxaban) start NOAC Converting NOAC to warfarin Consider overlapping therapies to avoid low anticoagulation troughs May take 5-10 days before INR in therapeutic range Measure INR just before next dose of NOAC & 24º after last NOAC dose If in doubt parenteral anticoagulant coverage until INR 2 Creatinine Clearance Normal (>80 ml/min) Mild (50-80 ml/min) Moderate (30-50 ml/min) Severe (15-30 ml/min) Suggested Warfarin Start Time ~4 days before stopping NOAC ~3 days before stopping NOAC ~2 days before stopping NOAC ~1 day before stopping NOAC Converting NOAC to NOAC Initiate alternate NOAC when next dose due

Switching Between Parenteral Anticoagulants Converting from parenteral anticoagulant to NOAC Administration of Parenteral Anticoagulant Intermittent dosing (e.g. LMWH) Continuous infusion Recommended Starting Time for NOAC 0-2 hours before time of next dose At time of discontinuation Converting from NOAC to parenteral anticoagulant Start parenteral anticoagulant at next scheduled dose of NOAC

Temporary Discontinuation of NOACs Prior to Procedures Dabigatran Apixaban Edoxaban Rivaroxaban No important bleeding risk and/or adequate local haemostasis possible: perform procedure at trough level (i.e. 12h or 24h after last NOAC dose) Hold NOAC Dose Period for Presumed Procedural Bleeding Risk CrCl 80 ml/min CrCl 50-80 ml/min CrCl 30-50 ml/min Low risk High risk Low risk High risk Low risk High risk Low risk High risk 24h 48h 24h 48h 24h 48h 24h 48h 36h 72h 24h 48h 24h 48h 24h 48h 48h 96h 24h 48h 24h 48h 24h 48h CrCl 15-30 ml/min not known not known 36h 48h 36h 48h 36h 48h Adapted after Heidbuchel H, et al. Eurospace 2013;15:625-651.

Bleeding on anticoagulant Rx Adapted from Heidbuchel H et al. Europace. 2013;15:625-51.

Anticoagulant Drug Initiation and Follow-Up Strategy Initiate anticoagulant treatment Set indication for anticoagulation Document CHA 2 DS 2 VASc, HAS-BLED scores Choose anticoagulant Baseline CBC, renal and liver function Provide education Review co-medications Organize follow-up Identify responsible coordinator for follow-up Follow-up 1 month follow-up Adapted from Heidbuchel H et al. Europace. 2013;15:625-51. Re-educate & Check: Compliance Thromboembolic events Bleeding events Other side effects Repeat CBC, renal function Co-medications CHA 2 DS 2 VASc, HAS-BLED scores q follow-up 1 mo? 3 mo 6 mo

Checklist During Follow-Up of Patients on Anticoagulation Therapy Assessment Interval Comments Compliance Each visit Instruct patient to bring medication Re-educate on importance of strict intake schedule Inform about compliance aids (boxes, smartphone) Thromboembolism Each visit Review symptoms/signs of events Bleeding Each visit Assess nuisance bleeding Assess significant bleeding Reassess anticoagulation indication, dose Side effects Each visit Assess quality of life Need for temporary discontinuation for procedures Co-medications Each visit Instruct patient to bring all medications Blood sampling Yearly 6 monthly 3 monthly On indication Adapted from Heidbuchel H et al. Europace. 2013;15:625-51. CBC, renal and liver function Renal function if CrCl 30-60 ml/min or 15-30 ml/min If intercurring condition that may impact renal or hepatic function

Date Suggested Provider Checklist During Follow-Up of Patients on Anticoagulation (NOAC) Therapy Serum Creatinine Creatinine clearance Hb/HCT INR (if applicable) Events CHA 2 DS 2 - VASc score 7/1/15 1.5 55 45 NA nosebleed 4 2 HAS- BLED score

Additional Information Websites NATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATION: www.stroke.org AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: www.heart.org HEART RHYTHM SOCIETY: www.hrsonline.org AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY: www.acc.org Stop Afib: www.stopafib.org Smartphone Apps inrpro.com/anticoagulation_apps.asp