Urological Oncology INTRODUCTION. M Hammad Ather, Masooma Zaidi

Similar documents
GUIDELINES ON NON-MUSCLE- INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER

Clinical significance of immediate urine cytology after transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

NMIBC. Piotr Jarzemski. Department of Urology Jan Biziel University Hospital Bydgoszcz, Poland

The Effects of Intravesical Chemoimmunotherapy with Gemcitabine and Bacillus Calmette Guérin in Superficial Bladder Cancer: a Preliminary Study

Radical Cystectomy Often Too Late? Yes, But...

The Clinical Impact of the Classification of Carcinoma In Situ on Tumor Recurrence and their Clinical Course in Patients with Bladder Tumor

Urological Oncology. Dae Hyeon Kwon, Phil Hyun Song, Hyun Tae Kim.

Kyung Won Seo, Byung Hoon Kim, Choal Hee Park, Chun Il Kim, Hyuk Soo Chang

The Impact of Blue Light Cystoscopy with Hexaminolevulinate (HAL) on Progression of Bladder Cancer ANewAnalysis

Maintenance Therapy with Intravesical Bacillus Calmette Guérin in Patients with Intermediate- or High-risk Non-muscle-invasive

Patient Risk Profiles: Prognostic Factors of Recurrence and Progression

Original Article APMC-276

Frequency and predictors of recurrence of bladder tumour on first check cystoscopy a tertiary care hospital experience

Staging and Grading Last Updated Friday, 14 November 2008

Reviewing Immunotherapy for Bladder Carcinoma In Situ

Prognosis of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Difference between Primary and ProgressiveTumours and Implications fortherapy

Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Primary and Recurrent TCC 4/10/2010. Two major consequences: Strategies: High-Risk NMI TCC

Phase 2 Study of Adjuvant Intravesical Instillations of Apaziquone for High Risk Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Clinical Study of G3 Superficial Bladder Cancer without Concomitant CIS Treated with Conservative Therapy

UC San Francisco UC San Francisco Previously Published Works

Mixed low and high grade non muscle invasive bladder cancer: a histological subtype with favorable outcome

The value of EORTC risk tables in evaluating recurrent non muscle invasive bladder cancer in everyday practice

Should We Screen for Bladder Cancer in a High Risk Population: A Cost per Life-Year Saved Analysis?

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Are epicrises the Bermuda Triangle of information transfer?

THE USE OF HALF DOSE BCG FOR INTRAVESICAL IMMUNOTHERAPY IN NON MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER

Intravesical gemcitabine in combination with mitomycin C as salvage treatment in recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Effectiveness of A Single Immediate Mitomycin C Instillation in Patients with Low Risk Superficial Bladder Cancer: Short and Long-Term Follow-up

european urology 52 (2007)

Generated by Foxit PDF Creator Foxit Software For evaluation only.

SUPERFICIAL BLADDER CANCER MANAGEMENT

A rational risk assessment for intravesical recurrence in primary low grade Ta bladder cancer: A retrospective analysis of 245 cases

Issues in the Management of High Risk Superficial Bladder Cancer


Management of High Grade, T1 Bladder Cancer Douglas S. Scherr, M.D.

Bas W.G. van Rhijn, M.D., Ph.D., F.E.B.U.*

Guidelines on Non-muscle invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and CIS)

Long term follow-up in patients with initially diagnosed low grade Ta non-muscle invasive bladder tumors: tumor recurrence and worsening progression

Joseph H. Williams, MD Idaho Urologic Institute St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center September 22, 2016

Improving Patient Outcomes: Optimal BCG Treatment Regimen to Prevent Progression in Superficial Bladder Cancer

Impact of Histopathological Variant on the Outcome of Patients Treated by Radical Cystectomy

Management of High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Seth P. Lerner, MD, FACS

Bladder Cancer Guidelines

Ivyspring International Publisher. Introduction. Journal of Cancer 2017, Vol. 8. Abstract

Comparative Outcomes of Primary, Recurrent, and Progressive High-risk Non muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

BLADDER CANCER: PATIENT INFORMATION

The outcome of non-muscle invasive urinary bladder tumour at Makassed General Hospital

EAU GUIDELINES ON NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE (TaT1, CIS) BLADDER CANCER

Citation International journal of urology (2. Right which has been published in final f

Review Article. Defining and Treating the Spectrum of Intermediate Risk Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Update on bladder cancer diagnosis and management

Pharmacologyonline 3: (2006)

A Review of Outcomes for Stage Ta Bladder Tumors

Controversies in the management of Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: URINARY TUMOR MARKERS FOR BLADDER CANCER. POLICY NUMBER: CATEGORY: Technology Assessment

MUSCLE - INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

Effective Health Care Program

Bladder cancer - suspected

imedpub Journals

INTRAVESICAL THERAPY AND FOLLOW-UP OF SUPERFICIAL TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA OF THE BLADDER

Efficacy and Safety of Hexaminolevulinate Fluorescence Cystoscopy in the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer

MUSCLE-INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

Contents of Online Supporting Information. etable 1. Study characteristics for trials of intravesical therapy vs. TURBT alone

models; Kaplan meier curves were also extrapolated for each cohort to compare disease specific and overall survival patterns.

/05/ /0 Vol. 174, 86 92, July 2005 THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. Printed in U.S.A. Copyright 2005 by AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Beware the BCG Failures: A Review of One Institution's Results

Second transurethral resection against Ta high grade tumor:residual location and predictive factor. A single center, retrospective study

Intravesical Gemcitabine for High Risk, Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer after Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Treatment Failure

Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel for the Salvage Treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Management of Superficial Bladder Cancer Douglas S. Scherr, M.D.

Critical Evaluation of Early Post-operative Single Instillation Therapy in NMIBC

MEDitorial March Bladder Cancer

Diagnosis and classification

Natural History, Recurrence, and Progression in Superficial Bladder Cancer

Incidence and predictors of understaging in patients with clinical T1 urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical cystectomy

Immunohistochemical determinations in evaluating the prognostic in patient with urinary bladder tumors

Role of Re-Resection in Non Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Early Single-Instillation Chemotherapy Has No Real Benefit and Should Be Abandoned in Non Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

The Role of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in the Treatment of Non Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

IAUN Conference Dublin, January Helen Forristal Cancer Nurse Co- Ordinator Jonathan Borwell Bladder Cancer Clinical Nurse Specialist

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC)

Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma: location as a predictive factor for concomitant bladder carcinoma

2004 World Health Organization Classification of the Noninvasive Urothelial Neoplasms: Inherent Problems and Clinical Reflections

Objectives. Results. Patients and Methods. Conclusions. associated percentages were used to analyse treatment variables.

Organ-sparing treatment of invasive transitional cell bladder carcinoma

5/26/16: CT scan of the abdomen showed a multinodular liver disease highly suspicious for metastasis and hydronephrosis of the right kidney.

Afterword: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology

Bone Metastases in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Radiochemotherapy after Transurethral Resection is an Effective Treatment Method in T1G3 Bladder Cancer

Multiple factor analysis of metachronous upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma after radical cystectomy

Guidelines for the Management of Bladder Cancer West Midlands Expert Advisory Group for Urological Cancer

Maintenance Bacillus Calmette-Guerin in High-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Cystoscopy in children presenting with hematuria should not be overlooked

Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder Histopathology

BJUI. The value of bladder mapping and prostatic urethra biopsies for detection of carcinoma in situ (CIS)

Decipher Bladder Predicts Which Patients May Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Prior to Radical Cystectomy

Guidelines on TaT1 (Non-muscle invasive) Bladder Cancer

Koji Ichihara Hiroshi Kitamura Naoya Masumori Fumimasa Fukuta Taiji Tsukamoto

Radical Cystectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: Oncological Outcome and Survival Predictors

Intravesical Therapy for Bladder Cancer

Transcription:

Urological Oncology Predicting Recurrence and Progression in Non-Muscle- Invasive Bladder Cancer Using European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Risk Tables M Hammad Ather, Masooma Zaidi Keywords: urinary bladder neoplasms, disease progression, neoplasm recurrence, risk Introduction: We determined the recurrence and progression at 1 year in patients with non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and compared those with the calculated risk according to the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Materials and Methods: Follow-up data of 92 patients with non-muscleinvasive bladder cancer who underwent TURBT were reviewed, and their 1st year recurrence and progression were recorded. The risk of recurrence and progression were calculated for 1 year according to the EORTC scoring system, using tumors stage, grade, size, and multiplicity, and the presence of carcinoma in situ and previous recurrence episodes. The outcomes were compared with the EORTC s predictive scores. Results: The patients were 75 men and 17 women with an age range of 31 to 91 years. Sixteen patients (17.4%) had a recurrent disease, 41 (44.6%) had a tumor larger than 3 cm in diameter, 35 (38.0%) had multiple lesions, 2 (2.2%) had carcinoma in situ, 73 (79.3%) had stage T1 lesions, and 8 (8.7%) had a high-grade disease. Recurrence was found in 34 patients (37.0%). The recurrence rates were 20.0%, 28.2%, 40.5%, and 83.3% in groups with the predicted EORTC risks of 15%, 24%, 38%, and 61%, respectively. There were 2 patients (2.2%) with progression of the diseases. Conclusion: A significant concordance was noted between the EORTC s predicted risk and the actuarial recurrence rate of stage Ta T1 bladder cancer at 1 year. Progression was less than that predicted, probably due to our small sample size. Urol J. 2009;6:189-93. www.uj.unrc.ir Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan Corresponding Author: M Hammad Ather, FCPS (Urol), FEBU Dept of Surgery, PO Box 3500, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan Tel: +92 21 486 4778 Fax: +92 21 493 4294 E-mail: hammad.ather@aku.edu Received January 2009 Accepted May 2009 INTRODUCTION Bladder carcinoma is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract. (1) Data from tumor registry data analysis of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, showed that bladder cancer was the 5th most common cancer in men during a period between 1992 and 2001. (2) In a minimal cancer incidence data for Karachi, the largest city of Pakistan, for the years 1998 and 1999 indicate that tobacco-associated cancers in Karachi were responsible for 38.3% of the tumors diagnosed amongst the men. (3) Approximately 75% to 85% of patients with bladder cancer present with the disease confined to the mucosa (stage Ta and carcinoma in situ) or submucosa (stage T1) with various grades of Urology Journal Vol 6 No 3 Summer 2009 189

differentiation. (4) Non-muscle-invasive urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder (UCC) accounts for about 80% of all the newly diagnosed cancers. (1) Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) is the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment. Reported recurrence after TURBT is about 30% to 70%. (1) The classic way to categorize patients with stage Ta and stage T1 tumors is to divide them into risk groups based on prognostic factors derived from multivariate analyses. Using such a technique, it was proposed to divide patients into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups. (5) When using these risk groups, however, no difference is usually made between the risk of recurrence and progression. Although prognostic factors may indicate a high risk of recurrence, the risk of progression may still be low and other tumors may have a high risk of both recurrence and progression. In order to separately predict the short-term and long-term risks of both recurrence and progression in individual patients, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) developed a scoring system and risk tables. (6) The scores can be calculated for each patient according to the EORTC recurrence and progression predictor table and percentage risk calculated. We undertook this study to validate the scoring system on our patients with non-muscle-invasive UCC. Our aim was to compare the predicted (EORTC model) versus actual recurrence rate, without taking into consideration the maintenance therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients This retrospective study was conducted on the records at a university hospital between March 1998 and December 2007, and 178 patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer were evaluated. They were treated with TURBT and diagnosed with stage Ta or stage T1 transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder based on the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system. (7) The grades were determined using the 1973 World Health Organization system. Patients with a history of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with a bladder-sparing protocol, non-tcc histology, primary carcinoma in situ, or a follow-up duration of less than 12 months were excluded. After exclusions, 92 patients were enrolled in this study. Follow-up Follow-up cystoscopies were done every 3 months for the first 2 years in all of the patients, followed by a protocol dictated by the risk stratification. After 2 years, the follow-up cystoscopies were done yearly for 5 years in low-risk patients. In high-risk patients, cystoscopies were done every 4 months during the 3rd year, and every 6 months during the 4th and 5th years. Prior to each followup cystoscopy, 2 free voided urine cytology tests were performed in order to determine the need for random biopsy. We collected the clinical and pathological data, including sex, age, tumor size (< 3 cm or 3 cm), multiplicity (single or multiple), T category (Ta or T1), tumor grade, presence of concomitant carcinoma in situ or squamous differentiation, and intra vesical therapy (single instillation following TURBT and maintenance). Follow-up data were also obtained, including pathologically proven recurrence and time to the first recurrence, which was defined as the time period between the date of initial diagnosis and the date of recurrence. All pathological specimens were routinely assessed in the pathology department. Pathologists were not blinded to the results of initial pathology report or patients clinical findings. Patients who were still alive or who had died before a recurrence were considered as censored at the date of the last available follow-up cystoscopy. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Scoring Scores of progression and recurrence risks at 1 year were calculated for each patient according to the EORTC (available from: http://www. eortc.be/tools/bladdercalculator/). (8) We assessed the impact of various clinical and pathological features on the outcome of the 1st year. Intravesical single instillation of chemotherapy (mitomycin C, 40 mg) was given to all patients 190 Urology Journal Vol 6 No 3 Summer 2009

following initial transurethral resection. Maintenance intravesical treatment (either with mitomycin C or bacillus Calmette-Guerin) was given to the patients with intermediate or high risk of progression. In accordance with the EORTC model, the impact of either single instillation of chemotherapeutic agents following TURBT, maintenance intravesical chemotherapy, and immunotherapy were not specifically assessed. The provided software implements the EORTC Scoring System and Risk Tables for Stage Ta T1 Bladder Cancer based on the data published by Sylvester and colleagues. (6) They allow the user to estimate the probability of recurrence and progression in patients with stages Ta and T1 bladder cancer based on 6 different factors: number of tumors, tumor size, prior recurrence rate, T category, concomitant carcinoma in situ, and grade. The endpoint was comparison of predicted versus actual recurrence, irrespective of the intravesical maintenance therapy. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 31 to 91 years), and their median follow-up duration was 38 months (range, 12 to 101 months). They were 75 men (81.5%) and 17 women (18.5%). Seventy-one patients presented with hematuria (77.2%), 15 with lower Table1. Bladder Tumor Characteristics Characteristics Value (%) Bladder tumor Primary 76 (82.6) Recurrent 16 (17.4) Tumor size, cm < 3 51 (55.4) 3 41 (44.6) Number of tumors 1 57 (62.0) 2 to 7 28 (30.4) 8 7 (7.6) Concomitant carcinoma in situ 2 (2.2) Tumor stage Ta 19 (20.6) T1 73 (79.3) Tumor grade 1 46 (50.0) 2 38 (41.3) 3 8 (8.7) Table 2. Predicted Versus Actual 1-Year Recurrence Rate* EORTC s Recurrence Prediction (Score) Patients Recurrence After 1 Year (%) 15% risk (0) 5 1 (20.0) 24% risk (1 to 4) 39 11 (28.2) 38% risk (5 to 9) 42 17 (40.5) 61% risk (10 to 17) 6 5 (83.3) *Prediction scores were calculated according to the European Organization for research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Table 3. Predicted Versus Actual 1-Year Progression Rate* EORTC s Progression Prediction (Score) Patients Progression After 1 Year (%) 0.2% risk (0) 5 0 1% risk (1 to 6) 33 1 (3.0) 5% risk (7 to 13) 51 1 (1.9) 17% risk (14 to 23) 3 0 *Prediction scores were calculated according to the European Organization for research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). urinary tract symptoms (16.3%), and 6 with a combination of these symptoms (6.5%). Tumor characteristics, including primary or recurrent, size, number, and pathological characteristics are summarized in Table 1. After 1 year, there were 34 patients (37.0%) with recurrence of the tumor. The recurrence rates after 1 year are listed and compared with the predicted EORTC risks in Table 2. Progression of the cancer was seen in 2 patients (2.2%) during the first postoperative year. The predicted risks of progression by the EORTC in comparison with the progression cases are summarized in Table 3. DISCUSSION The clinical management of non-muscle-invasive UCC is challenging, as it has a marked tendency to recur and to progress. These recurrences are most frequent in the first 3 years, but sometimes are seen even after long periods of dormancy. (9) Regular urological follow-up assessments should be continued until at least 15 years of tumorfree status, especially in patients treated with intravesical chemotherapy or in those initially having multiple tumors. Prediction of progression is made by various tumor characteristics such as tumor size, number of tumors, prior recurrence, and grade and stage of the disease. These factors are incorporated in the EORTC s developed a risk scoring system. (6) Scores were calculated for each patient according to the EORTC recurrence Urology Journal Vol 6 No 3 Summer 2009 191

and progression predictor table and percentage risk. However, sometimes patients with nonmuscle-invasive UCC are often observed without progression in the long-term follow-up period, although many of them experience recurrence of the disease. It is difficult to accurately predict the disease outcome of each patient with conventional prognostic criteria. In such situation, Fujikawa and colleagues (10) proposed that the use of the artificial neural network has a potential to improve the prediction. They noted that long-term progressionfree survival of patients with noninvasive TCC of the urinary bladder can be precisely predicted using the artificial neural network, which would be one of the criteria for making decision about immediate or future total cystectomy. The use of molecular markers and gene expression profiling provides a promising approach for improving the predictive accuracy of current prognostic indexes for predicting progression. In order to establish prognostic factors of recurrence and progression in stage T1 TCC, paying special attention to prognostic value of p53 and ki67 is suggested by some authors. A group from Spain (11) noted that solid microscopic pattern and p53 expression are the variables which best predict progression. A positive relationship was observed between p53 and progression: the greater the expression of p53, the greater the progression. Tumor multifocality and ki67 expression of greater than 27% are the main prognostic factors for recurrence. (11) Galectin-3 is a glycoprotein involved in various physiological cellular processes. Altered expression or loss of function of galectin-3 is suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis and further progression of various human cancer entities. Kramer and colleagues (12) studied the role of galectin-3 in the development and/or progression of nonmuscle-invasive (pta, pt1) TCC of the bladder. They noted that loss of galectin-3 appeared to be involved in the carcinogenesis of TCC and to serve as a valuable biological variable to identify a subgroup of patients with stage Ta bladder cancer at a high risk of the development of recurrent disease. Baak and colleagues (13) studied the predictive value for recurrence and stage progression of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction by flow cytometry and highly automated ultrafast image cytometry in biopsies of stages Ta and T1 UCCs of the bladder. They observed that DNA image cytometric features predicted recurrence and stage progression more accurately than classic prognostic factors, independent of treatment modality. The clinical significance of various molecular markers in predicting prognosis is still being debated. Current recommendations of the European Association of Urology guidelines (14) are to use EORTC risk calculator incorporating. CONCLUSION The current work showed that the recurrence rates were found to be similar as compared to the EORTC model. Progression rates were found to be less than that predicted by the scoring system, most likely because of the limitations in this study, including the small sample size. We propose validation of EORTC table in a larger cohort for its global applicability. CONFLICT OF INTEREST None declared. REFERENCES 1. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM. Globcan 2002, Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide, IARC CancerBase No 5, version 2.0. Lyon: IARCC Press; 2004. 2. Jamal S, Moghal S, Mamoon N, Mushtaq S, Luqman M, Anwar M. The pattern of malignant tumours: tumour registry data analysis, AFIP, Rawalpindi, Pakistan (1992-2001). J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56:359-62. 3. Bhurgri Y, Bhurgri A, Hasan SH, et al. Cancer patterns in Karachi division (1998-1999). J Pak Med Assoc. 2002;52:244-6. 4. Heney NM, Ahmed S, Flanagan MJ, et al. Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence. J Urol. 1983;130:1083-6. 5. Millan-Rodriguez F, Chechile-Toniolo G, Salvador- Bayarri J, Palou J, Algaba F, Vicente-Rodriguez J. Primary superficial bladder cancer risk groups according to progression, mortality and recurrence. J Urol. 2000;164:680-4. 6. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466-5. 7. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging Manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer Verlag; 2002. 192 Urology Journal Vol 6 No 3 Summer 2009

8. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [homepage on the Internet]. EORTC risk tables for predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer [cited 2009 Aug 1]. Available form: http://www.eortc.be/ tools/bladdercalculator/ 9. Fujii Y, Fukui I, Kihara K, Tsujii T, Kageyama Y, Oshima H. Late recurrence and progression after a long tumorfree period in primary Ta and T1 bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 1999;36:309-13. 10. Fujikawa K, Matsui Y, Kobayashi T, et al. Predicting disease outcome of non-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder using an artificial neural network model: results of patient follow-up for 15 years or longer. Int J Urol. 2003;10:149-52. 11. Rodriguez Alonso A, Pita Fernandez S, Gonzalez- Carrero J, Nogueira March JL. [Multivariate analysis of recurrence and progression in stage T1 transitionalcell carcinoma of the bladder. Prognostic value of p53 and Ki67]. Actas Urol Esp. 2003;27:132-41. Spanish. 12. Kramer MW, Kuczyk MA, Hennenlotter J, et al. Decreased expression of galectin-3 predicts tumour recurrence in pta bladder cancer. Oncol Rep. 2008;20:1403-8. 13. Baak JP, Bol MG, van Diermen B, Janssen EA, Buhr- Wildhagen SB, Mestad O, Øgreid P, Kjellevold KH. DNA cytometric features in biopsies of TaT1 urothelial cell cancer predict recurrence and stage progression more accurately than stage, grade, or treatment modality. Urology. 2003;61:1266-72. 14. Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, Kaasinen E, Bohle A, Palou J. Guidelines on TaT1 (non-muscle invasive) bladder cancer. Arnhem (The Netherlands): European Association of Urology (EAU); 2008. Urology Journal Vol 6 No 3 Summer 2009 193