Opinion of the HMPC on a European Union herbal monograph on Crataegus spp., folium cum flore

Similar documents
Opinion of the HMPC on a European Union herbal

Opinion of the HMPC on a European Union herbal monograph on Vitis vinifera L., folium

Opinion of the HMPC on a European Union herbal monograph on Cimicifuga racemosa (L.) Nutt., rhizoma

Annex I: Community herbal monograph (EMA/HMPC/680618/2013)

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

Overview of comments received on European Union herbal monograph on Matricaria recutita L., flos (EMA/HMPC/55843/2011)

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Union herbal monograph on Ruscus aculeatus L. rhizoma

European Union herbal monograph on Peumus boldus Molina, folium

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Union herbal monograph on Ribes nigrum L., folium

European Union herbal monograph on Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam., herba

European Union herbal monograph on Pelargonium sidoides DC and/or Pelargonium reniforme Curt., radix

European Medicines Agency decision

Interested parties (organisations or individuals) that commented on the draft document as released for consultation.

European Medicines Agency. Superseded COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON SALVIA OFFICINALIS L.

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Union herbal monograph on Eschscholzia californica Cham., herba

European Union herbal monograph on Agrimonia eupatoria L., herba

European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use. Superseded COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL

European Union herbal monograph on Epilobium angustifolium L. and/or Epilobium parviflorum Schreb., herba

COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON PASSIFLORA INCARNATA L., HERBA

European Medicines Agency decision

Overview of comments received on Community herbal monograph on Leonurus cardiaca L., herba (EMA/HMPC/561942/2010)

European Union herbal monograph on Harpagophytum procumbens DC. and/or Harpagophytum zeyheri Decne., radix

European Medicines Agency decision

Organisations and/or individuals

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

Overview of comments received on Community herbal monograph on Cucurbita pepo L, semen (EMA/HMPC/136024/2010)

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Union herbal monograph on Hedera helix L., folium

COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) DRAFT COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON VALERIANA OFFICINALIS L., RADIX AND HUMULUS LUPULUS L.

European Union herbal monograph on Valeriana officinalis L., radix

European Medicines Agency decision

European Union herbal monograph on Pistacia lentiscus L., resin (mastix)

Prof.Dr.Theodor Dingermann, Institut für Pharmazeutische Biologie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt a.m.

European Medicines Agency decision

Community herbal monograph on Viola tricolor L. and/or subspecies Viola arvensis Murray (Gaud) and Viola vulgaris Koch (Oborny), herba cum flore

Superseded. Community herbal monograph on Ribes nigrum L., folium. Adoption by Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) 6 May 2010

European Union herbal monograph on Glycine max (L.) Merr., lecithinum

European Union herbal monograph on Curcuma longa L. (C. domestica Valeton), rhizoma

list (MLWP) September 2009 January 2010

European Medicines Agency decision

European Union herbal monograph on Symphytum officinale L., radix

European Medicines Agency decision

European Union herbal monograph on Hedera helix L., folium

Discussion by HMPC Drafting Group on Quality February Start of public consultation 27 June 2012

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Union herbal monograph on Prunus africana (Hook f.) Kalkm., cortex

Community herbal monograph on Cynara scolymus L., folium

European Union herbal monograph on Valeriana officinalis L., radix and Humulus lupulus L., flos

Transcription:

EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 EMA/HMPC/M/H/185 Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) Opinion of the HMPC on a European Union herbal monograph on Crataegus spp., folium cum flore Opinion The HMPC, in accordance with Article 16h(3) of Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended, and as set out in the appended assessment report, establishes by a majority of 17 out of 26 votes a European Union herbal monograph on Crataegus spp., folium cum flore which is set out in Annex I. The divergent positions are appended to this opinion. The Norwegian HMPC member agrees with the above-mentioned recommendation of the HMPC. This opinion is forwarded to Member States, to Iceland and Norway, together with its Annex I and appendices. The European Union herbal monograph and assessment report will be published on the European Medicines Agency website. 30 Churchill Place Canary Wharf London E14 5EU United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union European Medicines Agency, 2016. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.

Annex I: European Union herbal monograph (EMA/HMPC/159075/2014) EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 2/13

Appendix I: Assessment report EMA/HMPC/159076/2014) EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 3/13

Appendix II: Divergent positions EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 4/13

The indication Traditional herbal medicinal product used to relieve symptoms of temporary nervous cardiac complaints (e.g. palpitations, perceived extra heart beat due to mild anxiety) after serious conditions have been excluded by a medical doctor. The product is a traditional herbal medicinal product for use in specified indications exclusively based upon long-standing use., is not considered suitable for safe use in self-care by a patient or consumer. The validation of the traditional use, regarding this specific indication remains questionable. The specification of cardiac symptoms as part of the indication, are not acceptable for a Traditional herbal medicinal product. Emiel van Galen, HMPC member from the Netherlands EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 5/13

I do not support the proposed European Union Monograph for Crataegus spp., folium cum flore because the indication used to relieve symptoms of temporary nervous cardiac complaints (e.g. palpitations, perceived extra heart beat due to mild anxiety) after serious conditions have been excluded by a medical doctor is not considered acceptable for a traditional herbal medicinal product according to the following reasons: - cardiac complaints cannot be treated without medical supervision as provided for therapeutic traditional indication; - palpitations (perceived extra heart beat) are generally a benign symptom in healthy subjects, not in patients; - palpitations are not exclusively due to mild anxiety but they are also a clinical sign of cardiac arrhythmia, thyroid disorders, anaemia and other serious diseases; it is not easy for patients to distinguish between benign and not benign palpitations. Gioacchino Calapai, Co-opted member of the HMPC EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 6/13

I do not support the proposed monograph for Crataegus spp., folium cum flore based on concerns regarding the potential safe use of this herbal substance for self-medication to relieve symptoms of temporary nervous cardiac complaints (e.g. palpitations, perceived extra heart beat due to mild anxiety) after serious conditions have been excluded by a medical doctor as outlined in the first indication. Therefore, in my view this indication is not acceptable for a traditional herbal medicinal product in line with Directive 2004/24 EC. Ioanna Chinou, HMPC member from Greece EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 7/13

There are concerns regarding the potential safe use of this herbal substance for self-medication to relieve symptoms of temporary nervous cardiac complaints (e.g. palpitations, perceived extra heart beat due to mild anxiety) after serious conditions have been excluded by a medical doctor as outlined in the first indication. Therefore, the view is that this indication is not acceptable for a traditional herbal medicinal product in line with Directive 2004/24 EC. Furthermore, the use of Crataegus spp., folium cum flore as a traditional herbal medicinal product for relief of mild symptoms of mental stress and to aid sleep in adolescents, 12 18 years, is not considered acceptable. The data to support the proposed use in this age group are insufficient and it is considered that treatment should be under medical supervision. Linda Anderson, HMPC member from the United Kingdom EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 8/13

The indication 1) of the monograph for TU of Crataegus spp., folium cum flore cannot be accepted for the following - the requirement of the article 16a (1)(a) of the Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended is not fulfilled, as the symptoms related with cardiovascular disorders should be monitored by a medical doctor. Maria Helena Pinto Ferreira, Co-opted member of the HMPC EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 9/13

I do not support the proposed monograph for Crataegus spp., folium cum flore based on concerns regarding the potential safe use of this herbal substance for self-medication to relieve symptoms of temporary nervous cardiac complaints (e.g. palpitations, perceived extra heart beat due to mild anxiety) after serious conditions have been excluded by a medical doctor as outlined in the first indication. Therefore, in my view this indication is not acceptable for a traditional herbal medicinal product in line with Directive 2004/24 EC. Furthermore the following preparation cannot be considered as medicinal product because sweet wine with no further specification cannot be accepted as an extraction solvent and the herbal preparation do not differ from common alcoholic beverages, freely sold in wine shops; Liquid extract (DER 1:19.2-20), extraction solvent: sweet wine. Marisa Delbò, HMPC member from Italy EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 10/13

We have concerns regarding the potential safe use of this herbal substance in the following indication Traditional herbal medicinal product used to relieve symptoms of temporary nervous cardiac complaints (e.g. palpitations, perceived extra heart beat due to mild anxiety) after serious conditions have been excluded by a medical doctor. In our view this indication is not acceptable for a traditional herbal medicinal product in line with Directive 2004/24/EC. In addition we do not support the indication for relief of mild symptoms of mental stress and to aid sleep in children and adolescents (12-18 years) as this is not appropriate for self-medication in this population. Una Mockler, HMPC member from the Ireland EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 11/13

Primary pharmacodynamic does not indicate any sedative abilities of Crataegi flos preparations, what is inconsistent with monograph. Primary pharmacodynamics justifying the use the preparations in "nervous cardiac complaints" (positive influence on inotropic effect, effects on myocardial perfusion, effects on ischemia and reperfusion induced arrhythmias, inhibition of cardiac hypertrophy) were classified as secondary pharmacodynamics, what seem incompatible with the indications. In overall conclusions on clinical effects positive effects on cardiovascular system were also not referred, not in clinical pharmacology not in clinical efficacy there was not objective summary of positive aspects on patients with mild symptoms of first stages of cardiovascular insufficiency. However products containing Crataegi flos and folium preparations have been used in patients with minor complaints (on the level I and II in NYHA scale) in overview of comments the mentioned NYHA scale was substituted by another scale, focused on more serious clinical symptoms of heart failure. Changing view on of cardiovascular symptoms classification and putting starting point of the new scale in place where more serious clinical symptoms are forming starting point, the mild functional symptoms are neglected. In America both scales are used complementary, both the old functional scale and the one based on heart failure classification. The NYHA-scale hasn t been rejected. Wojciech Dymowski, HMPC member from Poland EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 12/13

In the case of indication 1) - traditional herbal medicinal product used to relieve symptoms of temporary nervous cardiac complaints (e.g. palpitations, perceived extra heart beat due to mild anxiety) after serious conditions have been excluded by a medical doctor- the duration of use is too long. Patients cannot wait for two weeks if their symptoms persist more than two weeks, a medical investigation is necessary whether there is need for other treatment or not. Zsuzsanna Biróné Dr Sándor, HMPC member from Hungary EMA/HMPC/244297/2016 Page 13/13