Element Clinical Program Perseus Late Breaking News and the Platinum Study Design

Similar documents
eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

Ian T. Meredith AM. MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FCSANZ, FACC, FSCAI, FAPSIC MonashHeart, Monash Medical Centre & Monash University Melbourne, Australia

SKG Congress, 2015 EVOLVE II. Stephan Windecker

Stephen G. Ellis, M.D. Professor of Medicine Director Invasive Services Co-Director Cardiac Gene Bank

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

Resolute in Bifurcation Lesions: Data from the RESOLUTE Clinical Program

COMPARE Trial Elvin Kedhi Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands

Update from the Tryton IDE study

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

BIOFREEDOM: Polymer free Biolimus A9 eluting

Nobori Clinical Studies Up-dates. Gian Battista DANZI, M.D. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Italy

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of a Novel Platinum Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent: The PLATINUM Trial

TCTAP Upendra Kaul MD,DM,FACC,FSCAI,FAMS,FCSI

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

Moins de 6 mois d antiagrégants après DES?

Medtronic Symposium The Complex Bifurcation Patient: new insights into stent selection

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

COMPLEX CASES: LEFT MAIN

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

Taking DES technology from concept to long term clinical evidence. Aurore Bouvier Global Product Manager Biosensors Europe

Disclosure Eberhard Grube, M.D.

Absorbable Scaffolds the Future of Coronary Interventions?

DES in Diabetic Patients

Run-Lin Gao, MD, FACC. On Behalf of I-LOVE-IT Trial Investigators

Biosensors Lunch Symposium

A Large Prospective Randomized Trial of DES vs BMS in Patients with STEMI

ABT 578 Elution from Phosphorylcholine: Zomaxx (Abbott)

CYPHER (Polymer-based Sirolimus-eluting DES) New Stent Platforms. Campbell Rogers, M.D. Chief Technology Officer

Vascular Intervention // Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent System. Orsiro. Clinically proven. Highly deliverable. Ultrathin 60 μm struts

Bioabsorbable stents: early clinical results. Dr Angela Hoye MB ChB, PhD Senior Lecturer in Cardiology Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals

Biolimus A9 Drug-Eluting Stents: Technical Aspects and a Comprehensive Review of the EU, Asia-Pacific, and US Clinical Trial Program

What Stent to Use? JASVINDAR SINGH MD, FACC

Second Generation Drug Eluting Stents: From Inhibition to Healing

Side branch occlusion in 500 ABSORB BVS

Biolimus-Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Durable Polymer: A Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

Innovation in Cardiovascular Interventions. New DES, Scaffolds and other Devices Have Angioplasty Results Improved

The BIO revolution: bioadsorbable stents. Federico Conrotto Cardiologia 2 Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Ultimaster clinical results in left main and bifurcations

Drug eluting balloons in CAD

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

HCS Working Group Seminars Macedonia Pallas Hotel, Friday 21 st February Drug-eluting stents Are they all equal?

From a DES to a BMS* Biosensors Clinical Trial Program. Taking the LEAD in DES Clinical Excellence. From Single de Novo.

A Polymer-Free Dual Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trial Versus Polymer-Based DES.

Bifurcation Stenting: IVUS and OCT Information

Assessing Myocardium at Risk: Applying SYNTAX

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

BIOFLOW V Comparison of UltraThin Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Polymer with Thin Everolimus- Eluting Durable Polymer Stents

Boston Scientific Corporation Drug-Eluting Stent Program

DRUG ELUTING STENTS. Cypher Versus Taxus: Are There Differences? Introduction. Methods SIGMUND SILBER, M.D., F.E.S.C., F.A.C.C.

Bioabsorbable Scaffolding: Technology and Clinical Update. PD Dr. Nicolas Diehm, MD, FESC Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Drug Eluting Stents: Bifurcation and Left Main Approach

Drug Eluting Stents Sometimes Fail ESC Stockholm 29 Set 2010 Stent Thrombosis Alaide Chieffo

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Dr. Robert J. van Geuns. Thoraxcenter ErasmusMC Rotterdam On behalf of Dr. Jean Fajadet and Co-investigators

Eberhard Grube MD FSCAI, FACC

Are New DES Designs Safer?

Drug eluting stents. Where are we now and what can we expect in 2003? Tony Gershlick Leicester

BIOFLOW-III an all comers registry with a Sirolimus Eluting Stent: Presentation of 1-Year TLF Data in patients with complex lesions

Drug Filled Stent Optical Coherence Tomography Results from RevElution Trial Stent Strut Coverage and Stent Apposition

NOBORI 2 Trials One Year Clinical Outcomes

Bioresorbable Stents: Innovation or Bust?

The Interventional Trials of the Year: (TCT, AHA, and ACC)

Late Loss Is The Single Best Parameter For Estimating Stent-Based Restenosis Resistance

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

Why Polymer Coated Paclitaxel Stents

Polymer-Free Stent CX - ISAR

TNT Session. The latest clinical evidence in diabetics for the Amphilimus TM eluting polymer-free DES. Rafael Romaguera, MD

Lessons for technique and stent choice

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

The titanium nitride oxide stent an alternative to DES. Adam de Belder MD FRCP Sussex Cardiac Centre BSUH on behalf of Hexacath

INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION DEVICE DESCRIPTION CLINICAL PROGRAM FIRST-IN-MAN CLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AMAZONIA SIR STENT...

Device and Clinical Program Highlights: SINOMED BuMA Stent

IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. K.Boerlage-van Dijk CarVasZ 2014

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

2-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Everolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization in Daily Practice

Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in an All-Comer Population in China

Current Status of BioresorbableScaffolds: Moving Forward or Backwards?

Clinical Study Everolimus-Eluting versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

TIDES-ACS trial. Comparison of TItanium-nitride-oxide coated bioactive stent to the Drug (everolimus)-eluting Stent in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Emerging Cardiac Technologies. Thomas D. Conley, MD FACC FSCAI BHHI Primary Care Symposium February 27, 2015

Tailored bifurcation therapy

DISRUPT CAD. Todd J. Brinton, MD Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine Adjunct Professor of Bioengineering Stanford University

Clinical Considerations for CTO

FANTOM II trial: Clinical results from the Fantom Sirolimus-Eluting BRS. Norbert Frey, MD University of Kiel, Germany

Ενδοςτεφανιαίεσ προκζςεισ (stents):παρόν και μζλλον. Σ Χατηθμιλτιάδθσ Αναπλθρωτισ Κακθγθτισ Πανεπιςτθμιακό Νοςοκομείο ΑΧΕΠΑ

BIONICS Trial BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System In Coronary Stenosis Trial

Mise à Jour sur le traitement du Pluritronculaire Philippe Généreux, MD

Clinical Study Age Differences in Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Patients Treated with Drug Eluting Stents at a Tertiary Medical Center

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

Inspiron Stent. Clinical Research Program. Pedro A. Lemos MD PhD. Heart Institute InCor University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil

Xience V (Promus) Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent

The Vascular Concepts - PRONOVA Durable Polymer Sirolimus Eluting Stent A Review of Indian Registry Results

PCI for LMCA lesions A Review of latest guidelines and relevant evidence

Transcription:

Element Clinical Program Perseus Late Breaking News and the Platinum Study Design Ian T. Meredith MBBS, BSc(Hons), Ph.D, FRACP, FACC, FCSANZ, FSCAI, FAHA, FAPSIC Professor and Director of Monash HEART Monash Medical Centre, Southern Health, Melbourne Australia CIT March 2010

Element Stent Platform Clinical Program TAXUS Element Stent System Paclitaxel Everolimus Promus Element Stent System 1-Year Data @ ACC 2010 N=1,486 Enrollment Complete N=1,727 CIT March 2010

Element Stent Platform Clinical Program TAXUS Element Stent System Paclitaxel 1-Year Data @ ACC 2010 N=1,486 CIT March 2010

TAXUS Element Stent TAXUS Stent Drug And Polymer New Element Stent Platform Paclitaxel Translute Polymer Alloy Platinum Chromium Designed for coronary stenting Proprietary BSC alloy Stent Design Element Stent Thin struts - 0.0032 (0.081mm)* New geometry Delivery System Element Catheter New Bi-Segment Inner Lumen Low profile Flex Push *Strut thickness for 2.25 mm 3.5 mm models; 0.086mm for 4.0 mm models. Data on file. Bench test results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance. All images courtesy of BSC. See glossary

Stent Technology Evolution: 3 Generations of TAXUS Stent Function Design & Delivery Metal Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Pt Cr Radial Strength 0.23N/mm 0.24N/mm 0.26N/mm Density 8.0g/cc 8.0g/cc 9.9g/cc Strut Thickness 132µm 97µm 81µm Nickel Content 14% 14% 9% Stent Models 2 3 4 Surface-to- Artery Ratio (across diameters) TAXUS Express Stent TAXUS Liberté Stent TAXUS Element Stent 11.1-16.7% 11.8-15.8% 12.4-15.1% Computer simulation Computer simulation Computer simulation Impact of Change Strength Recoil Radiopacity Flexibility Enhanced/ more uniform drug distribution

PERSEUS Clinical Program 2 parallel Trials in single, de novo lesions PERSEUS Workhorse (WH) NON-INFERIORITY of TAXUS Element Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent compared to TAXUS Express Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in vessels 2.75mm and 4.0 mm PERSEUS Small Vessel (SV) SUPERIORITY of TAXUS Element Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent compared to Bare Metal Express Stent from TAXUS V (historical control) in vessels 2.25mm and <2.75 mm Allocco et al. Trials 2010;11:1.

Trial Design PERSEUS WH PERSEUS Workhorse (WH), 2.75mm - 4.0mm, 28mm NON-INFERIORITY Design, Randomized 3:1 TAXUS Element Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent (N=942) TAXUS Express Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent (N=320) Primary Endpoint: TLF* (12 mos) Secondary Endpoint: in-segment %DS (9 mos)** *TLF=ischemia-driven TLR or MI/cardiac death related to target vessel **QCA cohort randomly assigned Statistical Methods Bayesian analysis used to power the 1 o and 2 o endpoints Success criteria: 95% Bayesian probability that TAXUS Element Stent is non-inferior to TAXUS Express Stent Predefined delta: 4.1% (TLF); 0.20 ln (%DS)* Standard (frequentist) method used for all other endpoints Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010

Perseus Trial Results Results Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010 on behalf of Dean J. Kereiakes, MD; Louis A. Cannon, MD; Robert L. Feldman, MD; Gregory J. Mishkel, MD; Abram C. Rabinowitz, MD; Robert Whitbourn, MBBS; Raymond Magorien, MD; Paul Underwood, MD; Keith D. Dawkins, MD CIT March 2010

Clinical & Angiographic Characteristics PERSEUS WH RCT Values are % (n/n) or mean±sd (N) TAXUS Express Stent (N=320) TAXUS Element Stent (N=942) P Value Age, years 63.5±9.5 (320) 62.2±9.6 (942) 0.03 Male 68.8 (220/320) 70.8 (667/942) 0.49 Diabetes 25.0 (80/320) 24.6 (232/942) 0.89 Insulin 7.5 (24/320) 7.3 (69/942) 0.92 Current Smoker 23.5 (73/311) 24.3 (223/916) 0.76 Unstable Angina 21.3 (68/320) 20.7 (195/942) 0.84 Prior CHF 7.5 (24/318) 6.0 (56/937) 0.32 Ejection Fraction 57.8±9.8 (317) 58.0±9.3 (939) 0.73 RVD, mm 2.8±0.5 (320) 2.8±0.5 (942) 0.37 Lesion Length, mm 14.1±5.8 (320) 14.2±6.1 (942) 0.68 Diameter Stenosis 71.7±10.9 (320) 72.1±10.9 (942) 0.58 B2/C Lesions 64.7 (207/320) 66.9 (630/942) 0.47

Post-Procedure QCA PERSEUS WH TAXUS Express Stent TAXUS Element Stent 4.0 P=0.01 MLD (mm) P=0.17 4.0 Acute Gain (mm) P=0.09 P=0.41 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.54 ±0.36 2.68 ±0.39 2.16 ±0.37 2.25 2.0 ±0.49 1.83 1.0 ±0.40 1.93 ±0.41 1.45 ±0.40 1.51 ±0.48 0.0 0.0 (61) (228) (61) (228) (61) (228) (61) (228) In-Stent In-Segment In-Stent In-Segment QCA Subset, Paired Lesion Analysis Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010

Procedural Outcomes PERSEUS WH Values are % (n/n) or mean±sd (N) TAXUS Express Stent (N=320) TAXUS Element Stent (N=942) P Value Technical Success* 98.8 (338/342 stents) 99.2 (1005/1013 stents) 0.51 Stent Length:Lesion Length 1.60±0.73 (319) 1.55±0.64 (940) 0.25 Multiple Stents 8.4 (27/320) 7.6 (72/942) 0.65 Max Stent Deploy Pressure 14.0±2.8 (316) 13.7±2.4 (932) 0.15 Post-Dilation Used 53.8 (172/320) 53.6 (505/942) 0.97 Max Post-Dilation Pressure 16.6±3.3 (172) 16.6±3.6 (506) 0.95 *Successful stent delivery and deployment to target vessel, without balloon rupture or stent embolization; per stent. Use of multiple stents for bailout indication only Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010

9-Month QCA Outcomes PERSEUS WH TAXUS Express Stent TAXUS Element Stent 9-Month Late Loss (mm) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Late Loss (mm) P=0.33 0.26 ±0.52 0.34 ±0.55 P=0.86 0.16 ±0.45 0.17 ±0.48 9m F/U MLD Baseline MLD 0.0 (61) (228) (61) (228) (61) (228) (61) (228) In-Stent In-Segment 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.57 ±0.65 Net Gain (mm) P=0.79 1.59 ±0.68 1.29 ±0.57 P=0.63 1.34 ±0.62 In-Stent In-Segment QCA Subset, Paired Lesion Analysis Late loss presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010. Net gain data on file at BSC.

12-Month Clinical Outcomes PERSEUS WH Event Rates (per Patient, %) 10 5 0 Pts at risk P=0.78 P>0.99 P=0.48 6.1 5.6 0.3 0.5 2.9 2.2 313 922 313 922 313 922 TLF *TLF: ischemia-driven TLR, or MI/cardiac death related to the target vessel. Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010 Cardiac Death TAXUS Express Stent (N=320) TAXUS Element Stent (N=942) MI P=0.60 4.5 3.8 313 922 TLR *12m DAPT compliance 89%, both groups

Primary/Secondary Endpoints PERSEUS WH (Bayesian Analysis) 1 o Clinical Endpoint: TLF (97.7% complete F/U 12 mos) 2 o QCA Endpoint: ln(%ds) (87.6% complete F/U 9 mos) Difference: -0.57% Δ 4.1% Difference: -0.03 Δ 0.20 95% Credible Interval 1.85% 95% Credible Interval 0.11-1 0 1 2 3 4-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 Posterior Probability of Non-Inferiority = 0.9996 Posterior Probability of Non-Inferiority = 0.9970 P(θ1- θ2 < 4.1% data) 0.95 (μ1 μ2 < 0.20 data) 0.95 Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010

12-Month Clinical Outcomes - Safety PERSEUS WH 10 TAXUS Express Stent (N=320) TAXUS Element Stent (N=942) Event Rates (per Patient, %) 5 0 Pts at risk P>0.99 P>0.99 P=0.48 P=0.34 P=0.17 P>0.99 0.3 Cardiac Death 0.5 0.6 0.7 All Death 2.9 MI 2.2 313 922 314 922 313 922 0.0 0.5 313 922 Q-Wave MI 2.9 1.6 313 922 Non-Q MI 0.3 0.4 313 918 ST* ARC Def/Prob *12m DAPT compliance 89%, both groups Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010

Non Q-Wave MI to 12 Months PERSEUS WH 10 TAXUS Express Stent (N=320), LL=14.1±5.8, RVD=2.8±0.5 TAXUS Element Stent (N=942), LL=14.2±6.1, RVD=2.8±0.5 Cumulative Event Rate (%) 8 6 4 2 Periprocedural Events: 2.5% (8/320) 1.6% (15/942) (P=0.29) 1 additional event in TAXUS Express P=0.17 2.8% 1.6% 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010 Days Since Index Procedure Event Rate±SE; Log-Rank P Value

Ischemia-Driven TLR Non-QCA Stent Cohorts Cumulative Event Rate (%) 6 5 4 3 2 1 SPIRIT IV Trial TAXUS Express Stent (N=1229), LL=14.5 ± 6.6, RVD=2.75 ± 0.46 Xience V (PROMUS ) Stent (N=2458), LL=14.8 ± 6.7, RVD=2.75 ± 0.48 PERSEUS Trial TAXUS Express Stent (N=246), LL=14.1±5.8, RVD=2.8±0.5 TAXUS Element Stent (N=686), LL=14.2±6.1,RVD= 2.8±0.5 4.5% 3.4% 2.8% 2.3% 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Days Since Index Procedure Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010 SPIRIT IV presented by G. Stone, TCT 2009. Data points represent similar lesion types from the two trials but are not head-to-head trials.. The PROMUS Stent is a private-labeled XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System manufactured by Abbott and distributed by Boston Scientific Corporation. XIENCE V is a trademark of Abbott Laboratories group of companies. SPIRIT is sponsored by Abbott.

PERSEUS, TAXUS ATLAS, SPIRIT Trials Data Sets in Absence of Small Vessels 15% 10% TAXUS ATLAS WH 12.3% 12.5% RVD 2.5mm p=0.94 6% 4% SPIRIT III RVD > 2.775mm subset RR = 1.17 [0.46, 2.97] 5% 2% 0% (n=978) (n=867) 12 month MACE* *Cardiac Death, MI, or ischemia-driven TVR 0% (n=137) (n=274) 12 month MACE* *Cardiac Death, MI, or ischemia-driven TVR 6% SPIRIT IV RVD > 2.75 mm subset 8% PERSEUS WH RVD 2.75mm 4% 2% 0% (n=1351)+ 12 month TLF* HR = 0.83 [0.49, 1.41] *Cardiac Death, targetvessel MI, or ischemiadriven TLR 5% 3% 0% (n=320) (n=922) 12 month TLF* P=0.78 *Target Vessel Cardiac Death, target-vessel MI, or ischemia-driven TLR TAXUS Express Stent TAXUS Liberté Stent Xience V (PROMUS ) Stent TAXUS Element Stent ATLAS WH: BSC Data on File; SPIRIT III: Gregg Stone, et. Al. JAMA: 2008 April (299)16:1903-13. SPIRIT IV: Presented by Gregg W. Stone, MD, TCT 2009. (+ total patient N= 1351 reported only). The PROMUS Stent is a private-labeled XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System manufactured by Abbott and distributed by Boston Scientific Corporation. XIENCE V is a trademark of Abbott Laboratories group of companies. SPIRIT is sponsored by Abbott.

Trial Design PERSEUS SV PERSEUS Small Vessel (SV), 2.25mm - <2.75mm, 20mm SUPERIORITY Design, Single Arm, Open Label TAXUS Element Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent (N=224) Historical Control BMS Express Stent (TAXUS V) (N=125) Primary Endpoint: in-stent late loss (9 mos) Secondary Endpoint: TLF (12 mos) vs. Prespecified Performance Goal (PG) *TLF=ischemia-driven TLR or MI/cardiac death related to target vessel **QCA cohort randomly assigned Statistical Methods Frequentist approach used for all endpoints 1 o Endpoint: 2-sided t-test vs. historical BMS control 2 o Endpoint: 1-sided binomial test vs. a prespecified performance goal* *Based on TAXUS IV/V results Allocco et al. Trials 2010;11:1. Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010

Post-Procedure QCA PERSEUS SV 4.0 P=0.50 MLD (mm) Paired Lesion Analysis P=0.18 4.0 Express Stent TAXUS Element Stent Acute Gain (mm) P=0.007 P=0.55 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.09 ±0.30 2.11 ±0.21 1.76 ±0.38 1.70 2.0 1.47 ±0.29 1.0 ±0.33 1.57 ±0.27 1.14 ±0.39 1.16 ±0.30 0.0 (108) (197) (108) (197) (108) (197) (108) (197) In-Stent In-Segment 0.0 In-Stent In-Segment Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010

Primary & Secondary Endpoints PERSEUS SV In-Stent Late Loss (mm) 1.5 1.0 0.5 1 o Endpoint: Late Loss (87.4% complete F/U 9 mos ) Superiority Met: P<0.001 Difference [95% CI]: -0.42 [-0.54,-0.30] 0.80 ±0.53 0.38 ±0.51 2 o Endpoint: TLF (97.4% complete F/U 12 mos) TAXUS Element Mean 12m TLF: 7.3% (16/218) 10.8% Upper 1-Sided 95% CI 5 10 15 PG* 19.5% 0.0 N=108 N=197 Express Stent TAXUS Element Stent P<0.001 *Prespecified Performance Goal (lesion-matched TAXUS IV/V PES cohort) Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010

Clinical Outcomes (12 Month) PERSEUS SV, Propensity Score Adjusted Event Rates (per Patient, %) 30 20 10 0 20.5 19.7 6.6 4.7 TLF * TLR Cardiac Death *TLF: ischemia-driven TLR, or MI/cardiac death related to the target vessel. 1.8 0.4 1.0 1.8 Express Stent (N=125) TAXUS Element Stent (N=224) P=0.01 P=0.006 P=0.26 P=0.56 P=0.26 P=0.65 Presented by Dean J. Kereiakes, MD at ACC 2010 All-Cause Death 2.5 MI 0.6 0.6 0.3 ST (ARC Def/Prob)

PERSEUS Clinical Program 12-month TLR Rates in SV Pivotal Approval Trials Incidence of TLR (%) 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% N= TAXUS V SV* 25.0% 14.2% TAXUS Express Stent 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% TAXUS ATLAS SV** 13.2% TAXUS Liberte Stent PERSEUS SV*** TAXUS Element Stent Control: BMS Express Stent Control: TAXUS Express Stent Control: BMS Express Stent 5.8% 25% 20% 15% 10% 0% 0% 95 108 75 261 125 5% 19.7% 4.7% 224 * 2.25 mm subgroup of the randomized TAXUS V Trial. Data presented by Ellis, TCT 2005. Mean RVD for TAXUS Express Stent arm = 2.07 mm **Propensity adjusted data. JACC Vol. 1 No. 8, 2008. Mean RVD for TAXUS Liberté stent arm = 2.02 mm. ***Propensity Adjusted values. Data on file at BSC. PERSEUS SV arm. Mean RVD for TAXUS Element stent arm = 2.08 mm

Element Stent Platform Platinum Clinical Program Everolimus Promus Element Stent System Enrollment Complete N=1,727 CIT March 2010

PLATINUM Clinical Program PROMUS Element Stent Enrollment complete Drug And Polymer PROMUS (Xience V ) Stent Everolimus Fluorinated Copolymer Stent Platform New Element Stent Flex Push Clinical Program Overview Trial/Subtrial Workhorse RCT Small Vessel Long Lesion PLATINUM QCA # of Patients 1,531 94 102 100 Comparator PROMUS (Xience V) Stent Control Group Performance Goal Based on Historical TAXUS Express Results N/A

PLATINUM Clinical Program (I) PROMUS ELEMENT Stent in de novo lesions PLATINUM WH, SV, LL PLATINUM Trial/Subtrial Workhorse Small Vessel Long Lesion QCA # of Patients 1,531 94 102 100 # of Sites 160 (Worldwide) 20 (US & Japan) 20 (US & Japan) 10 (IC) Trial Design 1:1 Randomized, Single Blind Single Arm Single Arm Single Arm Success Criteria Non-inferiority Non-inferiority Non-inferiority N/A Test Stent PROMUS Element Stent PROMUS Element Stent Control Stent PROMUS Stent Historical PROMUS Stent Data from SPIRIT Trials N/A Primary Endpoint 12M TLF 12M TLF 12M TLF 30 day cardiac events

PLATINUM Clinical Program (II) PROMUS ELEMENT Stent in de novo lesions PLATINUM WH, SV, LL PLATINUM Trial/Subtrial Workhorse Small Vessel Long Lesion QCA Total Lesions Up to 2 Up to 2 Up to 2 One Target Lesions Up to 2 de novo Single de novo Single de novo Single de novo Stent Size (mm) 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 12, 20, 28 2.25 12, 20, 28, 32 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 32, 38 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 12, 20, 28 Target Lesion Diameter (mm) 2.50 to 4.25 2.25 to <2.5 2.5 to 4.25 >2.5 <4.25 Target Lesion Length (mm) 24 28 >24 to 34 24 Clinical Follow-up 1M, 6M, 12M, 18M, 2Y, 3Y, 4Y, 5Y 1M, 6M, 12M, 18M, 2Y, 3Y, 4Y, 5Y 1M, 6M, 12M, 18M, 2Y, 3Y, 4Y, 5Y 1M, 9M, 12M QCA/IVUS Follow-up None None None 9M/9M

PLATINUM Clinical Program PROMUS ELEMENT Stent in WH, SV, LL lesions 160 clinical sites Asia Pacific Europe Japan South America United States CIT March 2010

PLATINUM Clinical Program PROMUS ELEMENT Stent in QCA Study 18 clinical sites Australia Malaysia New Zealand Singapore CIT March 2010

Platinum Trial Designs

Element Clinical Program Perseus Results & Platinum Study Design PtCr Element Stent design provides thinner stent struts with improved radial strength and flexibility without trading off visibility and radiopacity PERSEUS Trial indicates that TAXUS Element stent has: comparable efficacy to the TAXUS Express stent in workhorse lesions superior in efficacy to the bare metal Express stent in small caliber vessels no safety concerns Platinum suite of trials including the large RCT comparing Promus Element to Promus have recently been completed