Cost-Effectiveness of PCI with Drug Eluting Stents vs. Bypass Surgery for Patients with Diabetes and Multivessel CAD: Results from the FREEDOM Trial

Similar documents
Interventional Cardiology

2. If prasugrel is found to be both more costly and more effective than clopidogrel, to assess its costeffectiveness

Double-Dose Clopidogrel in ACS: The CURRENT/OASIS-7 Trial

Matthew R. Reynolds, M.D., M.Sc. On Behalf of the PARTNER Investigators

Approximately 6% of all American adults suffer from coronary

Quality of Life After Everolimus- Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease:

Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve

3 Year Clinical Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness of FFR- Guided PCI in Stable Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: FAME 2 Trial

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

A.K. Gitt, F. Towae, C. Juenger, A. Papp, R. Zahn, U. Zeymer, J. Senges For the STAR-Study-Group Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Germany

Economic evaluation of sirolimus-eluting stents Shrive F M, Manns B J, Galbraith P D, Knudtson M L, Ghali W A

Health Status after Transcatheter Mitral- Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Results from the COAPT Trial

Management of High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease

A bs tr ac t. n engl j med 367;25 nejm.org december 20,

Speaker s name: Thomas Cuisset, MD, PhD

EAPCI: Biodegradable Scaffolds-Writers 2016

STEMI Care 2014 at the Crossroads: Taking the right road

The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for clinical practice

P2Y 12 blockade. To load or not to load before the cath lab?

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Master Class in Preventive Cardiology Focus on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Geneva April

Antithrombotic therapy in the ACS patient with atrial fibrillation

SHOULD A REGIONAL STEMI CENTRE ONLY OFFER PRIMARY PCI?

J-curve Revisited. An Analysis of Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Events in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) Trial

Optimal Duration and Dose of Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI

Assessing Myocardium at Risk: Applying SYNTAX

PCI vs. CABG From BARI to Syntax, Is The Game Over?

The goal of pharmacological management of patients with

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

Heart Rate in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease - the Lower the Better? An Analysis from the Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

Better CABGs vs Better PCI Devices

Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture for Optimizing Results of Valve-in-Valve TAVR

TRATAMIENTO INVASIVO ENFERMEDAD ISQUEMICA ESTABLE. Jonathan Poveda CLINICA BIBLICA 2015

Original Studies. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 79: (2012)

Oral anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of ACS patients the cost of reducing death!

Rationale for Percutaneous Revascularization ESC 2011

Cost-effectiveness of measuring fractional flow reserve to guide coronary interventions Fearon W F, Yeung A C, Lee D P, Yock P G, Heidenreich P A

State of the Art in the ACS Atrial Fibrillation Overlap Syndrome

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

PCI for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: What Happened in the Last Week?

In patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Complex CAD (5) PVD-P Valv. CM. Sub-Clinical Arterial (2) DBD/Frailty (2) Health Political (1) Personal (3)

FFR in Multivessel Disease

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study appears to have been conducted in the UK.

In patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery

ΑΓΓΕΙΟΠΛΑΣΤΙΚΗ ΣΤΟ ΔΙΑΒΗΤΙΚΟ ΑΣΘΕΝΗ

Overcoming the Risk-Treatment Paradox in Non-STE ACS: It s Time! Christopher Granger, MD

Coronary Stent Choice in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Summary HTA. Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary artery bypass-grafting. HTA-Report Summary. Gorenoi V, Dintsios CM, Schönermark MP, Hagen A

Cost effectiveness of drug eluting coronary artery stenting in a UK setting: cost-utility study Bagust A, Grayson A D, Palmer N D, Perry R A, Walley T

FAME STUDY: 2-year Follow-Up & CLINICAL SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

The Case for PCI as the Preferred Therapy in Most Patients with Chronic Stable Angina

Δημήτριος Αγγοσράς, FETCS

Supplementary Online Content

Study design: multicenter, randomized, open-label trial following a PROBE design

Mise à Jour sur le traitement du Pluritronculaire Philippe Généreux, MD

Coronary stenting: the appropriate use of FFR

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

Subsequent management and therapies

Bioresorbable stents for all or for few? Franz-Josef Neumann

Roxana Mehran, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Ron Waksman, Joseph M. Sweeny, Ganesh Raveendran, Renli Teng, Yonggang Zhao, Glenn Carlson NCT

Left Main Intervention: Where are we in 2015?

Frequency of Major Noncardiac Surgery and Subsequent Adverse Events in the Year After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement

7-Year Follow-up From a Randomized Trial of Sirolimus-Eluting vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (RESET)

Implications of Universal MI Definition for Clinical Trials

COMPARE Trial Elvin Kedhi Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands

Joo-Yong Hahn, MD/PhD

SYNTAX score before decision making! Corrado Tamburino, MD, PhD

Abciximab plus Heparin versus Bivalirudin in Patients with NSTEMI Undergoing PCI. ISAR-REACT 4 Trial

THE ECONOMICS OF ADJUNCTIVE THERAPIES IN CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY: DRUGS, DEVICES, OR BOTH?

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study was carried out in the UK.

Chronic Total Occlusions. Stephen Cook, MD Medical Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Oregon Heart & Vascular Institute

Reconciling the Results of the Randomized Trials

Surgical vs. Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome

How Long Patietns Will Be on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy?

Benefit of Performing PCI Based on FFR

Economic Evaluation of cabazitaxel (Jevtana ) for the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated

Economic evaluation of sirolimus-eluting stents

Coronary Artery Disease: Revascularization (Teacher s Guide)

Left Main Intervention: Will it become standard of care?

Clinical Study Age Differences in Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Patients Treated with Drug Eluting Stents at a Tertiary Medical Center

Left Main PCI vs. CABG: Real World

ROBOTIC CARDIAC SURGERY

Disclosures. Theodore A. Bass MD, FSCAI. The following relationships exist related to this presentation. None

Michael Mack, M.D. Baylor Healthcare System Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Dallas, TX

A Large Prospective Randomized Trial of DES vs BMS in Patients with STEMI

Freedom to Treat Your High Bleeding Risk Patients. Tim Kinnaird University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK

Engage AF-TIMI 48. Edoxaban in AF: What can we expect? Cardiology Update John Camm. St. George s University of London United Kingdom

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond One Year After Drug-eluting Coronary Stent Procedures

Twenty years of coronary angioplasty

Antiplatelet Therapy: how, why, when? For Coronary Stenting

J. Michael Gaziano, M.D., M.P.H. European Society of Cardiology August 26 th 2018

SCA ST- : recommandations européennes 2015 La durée de la bithérapie : à géométrie variable?

Economic Analyses in Clinical Trials

7 th Munich Vascular Conference

Bern-Rotterdam Cohort Study

Transcription:

Cost-Effectiveness of PCI with Drug Eluting Stents vs. Bypass Surgery for Patients with Diabetes and Multivessel CAD: Results from the FREEDOM Trial Elizabeth A. Magnuson, Valentin Fuster, Michael E. Farkouh, Kaijun Wang, Katherine Vilain, Haiyan Li, Jaime Appelwick, Victoria Muratov, Lynn A. Sleeper, Mouin Abdallah, David J. Cohen Saint Luke s Mid America Heart Institute University of Missouri-Kansas City Kansas City, Missouri

Disclosures FREEDOM was supported by U01 grants #01HL071988 and #01HL092989 from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Other support for FREEDOM: Drug eluting stents were provided by Cordis, Johnson and Johnson and Boston Scientific Abciximab and an unrestricted research grant were provided by Eli Lilly and Company Clopidogrel was provided by Sanofi Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb E. Magnuson has received research grants from: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Eli Lilly and Co, Astra Zeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Abbott Vascular

Background Time to Death/MI/Stroke Death/Stroke/MI, % 30 20 10 PCI/DES CABG Logrank P=0.005 PCI/DES CABG 0 5-Year Event Rates: 26.6% vs. 18.7% 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years post-randomization

Patient Flow 1900 patients randomized 947 assigned to CABG 953 assigned to PCI 36 no procedure (withdrawn) 9 no procedure (withdrawn) 911 underwent revascularization 944 underwent revascularization 893 initial CABG 18 initial PCI 939 initial PCI 5 initial CABG Median follow-up duration: 47 months

Economic Study Analysis Plan Primary Endpoint: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained» Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually General Approach 2 Stages: In-trial analysis based on observed survival, health state utility (EQ-5D), and costs derived from reported health care resource use during the trial period Lifetime analysis based on projections of survival, quality-adjusted survival and costs beyond the trial period

Costing Methods PCI and CABG Procedures: Cath lab and CABG-related procedure costs based on measured resource utilization (procedure duration, balloons, stents, wires, etc.) and current unit costs DES cost = $1500/stent Ancillary hospital costs based on regression models developed from 2010 MedPAR data for FREEDOMeligible patients Clinical events and complications rather than LOS were used as key predictors to avoid distortions due to marked differences in LOS across different countries/health care systems Additional costs: CV and non-cv rehospitalizations, MD fees, outpatient CV care/testing and medications, cardiac rehabilitation and nursing home stays

Index Procedure Resource Use* (includes planned staged PCI procedures) CABG PCI PCI procedures 1 66.6% 2 30.9% 3-4 2.3% Drug-eluting stents 4.1 ± 1.9 Paclitaxel-eluting 45.6% Sirolimus-eluting 51.7% Other drug-eluting stents 2.7% Procedure duration (mins) 248 ± 78 107 ± 6.7 Total Procedure Cost $9,739 ± $2,453 $13,014 ± $5,173 * Per protocol population

Index Hospitalization Costs* (includes planned staged procedures) Δ = $8,622 (p<0.001)) $34,467 $25,845 * ITT population

5-Year Follow-up Resource Utilization Rates per 100 person-years 20 P<0.001 15 P=0.52 10 5 0 P<0.001 3.3 6.8 0 1.7 PCI Procedures CABG Procedures CV Hospitalizations Non-CV Hospitalizations CABG 10.8 PCI 17.2 14.6 12.8

Annual and Cumulative Costs: Years 1-5 Annual $25,000 Cumulative $70,000 $20,000 Δ costs = $7878 $60,000 $50,000 $15,000 Δ costs = $3641 $40,000 $10,000 $30,000 $5,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 $0 CABG Annual Cost PCI Annual Cost CABG Cumulative Cost PCI Cumulative Cost

Annual Differences in Life Years and QALYs Time Since Randomization (Years) Δ Life Years (CABG-PCI) Δ QALYs (CABG-PCI) 1-0.008-0.033 2-0.010-0.034 3-0.0006-0.029 4 +0.015-0.004 5 +0.053 +0.031

Markov Model For the Projection of Post-Trial Life Years, QALYs and Costs Monthly risk of death based on age, sex and racematched data from US life tables calibrated to the observed 5 year mortality for the PCI population CABG effect based on a landmark analysis for years 2-5: mortality hazard ratio for CABG vs. PCI = 0.60 Base case: Gradual attenuation of CABG effect Mortality hazard ratio increases from 0.60 to 1 in a linear fashion between 5 and 10 years; no impact of CABG beyond 10 years Long-term costs and utility weights obtained from regression models developed from trial data

In-Trial and Projected Survival 1 0.053 life years 0.8 CABG PCI Survival 0.6 0.4 1.266 total life years gained with CABG (0.794 when discounted at 3% annually) 0.2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Years post-randomization

Lifetime Cost-Effectiveness Results $20,000 Cost QALY Cost QALY Long-term Cost (CABG PCI) $10,000 $0 -$10,000 Cost = $5392 QALY = 0.663 years $8132/QALY gained with CABG -$20,000 Cost QALY Costs and QALYs discounted 3% annually $50,000 per QALY Cost QALY -2-1 0 1 2 QALYs (CABG PCI)

Cost-Effectiveness of CABG vs. PCI Sensitivity Analysis No CABG Effect Beyond 5 Yrs 1 0.8 0.754 total life years gained with CABG (0.439 when discounted at 3% annually) No CABG Effect Years 5-10 Survival 0.6 0.4 CABG PCI 0.2 Δ Costs $9,485 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Years post-randomization Δ QALYs 0.351 ICER $27,022 Pr < $50K/QALY= 82.4%

Cost-Effectiveness of CABG vs. PCI SYNTAX Score Tertiles $20,000 Low (<23) Mid (23-32) High (>32) $10,000 $0 -$10,000 -$20,000-2 -1 0 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2 Δ Costs $8,784 Δ QALYs 0.407 ICER $21,582 Δ Costs $4,160 Δ QALYs 0.997 ICER $4,172 Δ Costs $973 Δ QALYs 0.315 ICER $3,088 Costs and QALYs discounted 3% annually

Subgroups Subgroup Δ Costs Δ QALYs ICER Prob. < $50,000 Male (n=1328) $3,059 0.778 $3,932 99.8 Female (n=527) $9,249 0.510 $18,135 77.3 Age <60 (n=624) $11,190 1.160 $9,647 99.8 Age 60-69 (n=621) -$1,765 0.276 Dominant 80.5 Age 70 (n=610) $6,892 0.349 $19,748 71.9 US (n=351) $4,701 1.120 $4,197 98.1 Non-US (n=1504) $5,622 0.576 $9,760 96.5

Summary (1) CABG is associated with initial costs $9,000/patient higher than PCI Partially offset by lower costs associated with repeat revascularization and to a lesser extent cardiac meds At 5 years, CABG improved quality-adjusted life expectancy by ~ 0.03 years while increasing total costs by ~ $3,600/patient Over a lifetime horizon, CABG associated with 0.66 QALYs gained and ~$5,400/patient higher costs yielding an ICER of $8,132/QALY gained

Summary (2) Results were robust to a broad range of sensitivity analyses regarding the duration of the CABG effect on both survival and costs Results were also consistent across a wide range of subgroups

Conclusions For patients with diabetes and multivessel CAD, CABG provides not only better longterm clinical outcomes than DES-PCI but these benefits are achieved at an overall cost that represents an attractive use of societal health care resources These findings provide additional support for existing guidelines that recommend CABG for diabetic patients with multivessel CAD