Drug eluting devices: Why paclitaxel works above the knee and sirolimus below the knee, is the stent or the drug?

Similar documents
Comparison of particulate embolization in different DCB formulations. Aloke V. Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD.

Pre-clinical comparison of drug coated balloons. Renu Virmani, MD CVPath Ins5tute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

A study of downstream events of the two leading DCBs on the market. Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

Pattern of calcification: intimal vs. medial, and difference below and above the knee. Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD.

How DCB drug dose effects vessel healing. Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

THE SCIENCE BEHIND DRUG COATED BALLOONS OUTCOMES

Drug delivery to the vessel wall: Coated balloons and the role of the excipient

DCB From a Pre-Clinical Perspective: The Relevance of Paclitaxel Dose and Coating Integrity

Disclosures. How many people have heard a talk on DCBs? By show of hands, how many people here have used a DCB?

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

DCB + BMS is not a DES

The Latest Experimental Results of Endothelialization with BuMA stent. Renu Virmani, MD CVPath Institute, Inc. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

DESIGN GOALS AND PRE- CLINICAL EVIDENCE OF NEXT GENERATION DCB

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

Drug Eluting Stent DES Pathology Update What we know, what we do not know

Zilver PTX Drug-Eluting Stent Mortality Analysis

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

Which Stent Is Best for Various Femoropopliteal Anatomy? 2018 Pacific Northwest Endovascular Conference June 15-26, 2018 Seattle, WA

New Drug Coated Balloons in Femoro-Popliteal Disease in Korea

Drug eluting stents and balloons in peripheral arterial disease A.T.O. ABDOOL-CARRIM UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

The Evolution of SFA Treatment Strategy with IN.PACT DCB

Clearing a Path for the Effective Treatment of Complex Arterial and Venous Disease

6-month 0utcomes of a Novel Sirolimus Coated DCB Technology Evaluated in SFA Thomas Zeller, MD University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen

Update on the role of drug eluting balloons

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have been shown

Non stent based intracoronary drug delivery

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

REFERENCE CODE GDME1058CFR PUBLICATION DATE SEPTEMBER 2013 DRUG-ELUTING BALLOONS APAC ANALYSIS AND MARKET FORECASTS

Sites of Atherosclerosis In order of Frequency

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

Lessons learnt from DES in the SFA is there any ideal concept so far?

Drug-Coated Balloons: Clinical Role in Coronary and Peripheral Interventional Therapy

Drug eluting balloons in CAD

ESVB State of the art: DES, DCB and the role of debulking. Gunnar Tepe, Rosenheim

Recent Advances in Peripheral Salvage

Endovascular Options in Critical Limb Ischemia: Below The Knee Therapies

Role of Covered Stents and Drug Eluting Balloons In Dialysis Access

DCB level 1 evidence review

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Clinically proven. ordering info. Vascular Intervention // Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System/0.018 /OTW. Pulsar-18

Fabrizio Fanelli, MD, EBIR Director Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department "Careggi " University Hospital Florence - Italy

Technological Perspectives for Endovascular Therapy of the Lower Limb

Legflow DCB Safety / outcomes from the clinical trial program

BTK Intervention with Drug- Coated Balloons: Past Lessons and Future Exploration

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

4/14/2016. Faculty Disclosure. Drug-eluting technology in the SFA and Popliteal. Typical SFA Disease Pattern. Why Peripheral Artery Disease Matters

New approaches for drug delivery in BTK arteries

Neuestes aus der Therapie der pavk. beschichtete Stents + Ballons. Karls-University. Eberhard-Karls. of Tubingen Department of Diagnostic Radiology

NEW GENERATION DES WITH NEW GENERATION POLYMERS. Prof. Dr. Rainer Wessely, Duisburg, Germany

Catch-up Phenomenon: Insights from Pathology

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

REACT Treatment Rationale and Clinical Evidence. ICI Meeting 5th of December 2017

The BATTLE Trial Comparing Bare Metal to Drug Eluting Stents for Intermediate Length Lesions of the SFA

Patient safety in the Eluvia DES and Ranger DCB programmes

PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL RESTENOSIS

MEET M. Bosiers K. Deloose P. Peeters. SFA stenting in 2009 : The good and the ugly What factors influence patency?

BIOLUX 4EVER : Combining Passeo-18 Lux DCB and Pulsar-18 BMS : 12 month results of full cohort

Evolving Role of Drug-Eluting Stents In Complex SFA - Majestic Trial Data

Management of In-stent Restenosis after Lower Extremity Endovascular Procedures

5-YEAR SUPERIOR RESULTS. Compared to PTA and Zilver BMS 1. NOW WITH 140 mm LENGTH STENTS

12-Month and preliminary 24-month outcomes of combining a DCB with a modern generation of nitinol stent in fem-pop lesions. BIOLUX 4EVER study

Second Generation Drug Eluting Stents: From Inhibition to Healing

Femoropopliteal disease: This is the State- of- the- art. Peter A. Schneider, MD Kaiser Hospital Honolulu, Hawaii

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

Drug eluting stents. Where are we now and what can we expect in 2003? Tony Gershlick Leicester

Current Status of DCB Experience with Non- Femoropopliteal Applications (Dialysis, Tibial, Venous)

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

Future of stenting in the. Koen Deloose, MD Head Dept Vascular Surgery AZ Sint Blasius Dendermonde, Belgium

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

Innovations are created to solve the limitations of an

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

Supplementary appendix

Konstantinos Katsanos, MSc, MD, PhD, EBIR. Consultant Interventional Radiologist Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

Konstantinos Katsanos, MSc, MD, PhD, EBIR

A Data-driven Therapeutic Algorithm For Choosing Among Currently Available Tools For SFA Intervention

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

The Evidence for Drug Coated Balloons Below The Knee:

DCB: What Is The Evidence?

Combination therapy : treatment rationale and clinical evidence

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

Getting to answers with clinical trials: Being bold

Merits and demerits of DES, DEB or covered stent in lower extremity arterial occlusive disease 성균관의과대학삼성서울병원순환기내과최승혁

IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. K.Boerlage-van Dijk CarVasZ 2014

Disclosures. Rational Selection of Endovascular Options for the SFA and Popliteal: What Works Where and for How Long?

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

INTERVENTIONAL VASCULAR DIAGNOSTICS AND THERAPY. SeQuent Please OTW PERIPHERAL DRUG COATED BALLOON CATHETER

Minimizing Burden, the effect of thin strut and low Chronic Outward Force SE stents

In 1977, coronary angioplasty revolutionized the

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

Transcription:

Drug eluting devices: Why paclitaxel works above the knee and sirolimus below the knee, is the stent or the drug? Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

Conflict of Interest Declaration Institution grant/research support 480 Biomedical, Abbott Vascular, Atrium, BioSensors International, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cordis J&J, GSK, Kona, Medtronic, MicroPort Medical, CeloNova, OrbusNeich Medical, ReCore, SINO Medical Technology, Terumo Corporation, and W.L. Gore, Spectronics, CSI, Lutonix Bard, Surmodics, Microport, Meril Life Sciences Speaking Honoraria Abbott, Cook Medical

Restenosis processes and inhibitors Chiraz Chaabane et al. Cardiovasc Res 2013;99:353-363

Sirolimus Sirolimus and Paclitaxel Solid line : FKBP12 binding site Dotted line : mtor binding site Paclitaxel Sirolimus inhibits mtor and is part of the phosphatidylinositol kinase-related family of serine/threonine kinases. Habib et al. Interventional Cardiology Clinics 2016;5:321-329 Paclitaxel binds to beta-tubulin and impairs microtubular disassembly and halts the cell cycle between G2 and M Gupta ML et al. PNAS 2003;100:6394-6397

Sirolimus v. Ptx Sirolimus Cytostatic Wider therapeutic index with higher doses better tolerated in terms of tissue damage Not as high tissue binding affinity (not as good for balloon delivery) Tissue permanence less than Ptx Less effective in ATK applications where vessels sizes are larger-drug concentrations likely less Paclitaxel Cytotoxic Low therapeutic index Higher doses cause tissue necrosis, wall damage, etc. Hydrophobic--binds highly to tissue elements and preference for subintimal space Good for balloon delivery Produces more fibrin and tissue damage--higher rates of TVF, stent thrombosis in clinical trials in coronary vessels

Effect of drugs used in DES in animal models Healthy animal models Suffolk Cross-bred sheep New Zealand White Rabbit Yucatan Minipig 15-25 cm 5-10 Kg 40-60 cm 50-60 Kg 80-100 cm 80-100 Kg Sirolimus + analogs Coronary : Biologic effects Paclitaxel Peripheral : Biologic effects Porcine coronary artery 3months Rabbit iliac artery 28days Sirolimus Sirolimus Paclitaxel Gregory J. Wilson et al. Circulation. 2009;120:141-149 Paclitaxel Nakazawa et al. Am J Cardiol 2007;100[suppl]:36M 44M

Type of drugs on DES/DCB in human In human coronary Balloon Expandable Stents Sirolimus + analogs Paclitaxel Successful 160-180 cm 60-80 Kg Everolimus 13 months Paclitaxel 9 months

Parameters DES DCB Drug concentration on the device Low 5-10 μg/mm Very High (given surface area) 2-3 μg/mm 2 ( 20-30 μg/mm) Drug transfer at the time of deployment Slow Rapid, all at once Reservoir of drug Polymer No (excipient important) Drug retention in tissues Longer than DCB Need the drug in crystalline form and should be easily transferable to adjacent cells. Binds to cell membranes Diffusion Good Excellent Lipophilic yes Even better Active ingredient Not necessary Should be active immediately BMS DES DCB DES DCB 28 days (Rabbit iliac artery) 14 days (Porcine iliac artery)

Lammer et al. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:394-401 Dake et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:495-504 Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions October 2011 vol. 4 no. 5 495-504 Type of drugs on DES/DCB in human In human peripheral (Above the knee) Sirolimus + analogs failed 160-180 cm 60-80 Kg Paclitaxel (stent and balloon) Successful Self-Expandable Stents Everolimus coated nitinol stent for SFA (STRIDES trial) Paclitaxel coated nitinol stent for SFA (Zilver PTX trial) Primary patency/1year 68% Freedom from TLR/1year 80% Primary patency/1year ZPTX 90% BMS 73% Freedom from TLR/1year ZPTX 91% BMS 83%

Katsanos et al Journal of Endovascular Therapy 23, 851-863 Type of drugs on DES/DCB in human In human peripheral (Below the knee) Sirolimus ± analogs/paclitaxel on stent Successful 160-180 cm 60-80 Kg Paclitaxel in DCB failed Bayesian Network meta analysis Sirolimus + analogs for CLI Pts Sirolimus Sirolimus Everolimus Sirolimus OR 0.51 95%Crl 0.26-0.98 Fusaro et al. JACC intv, 2013;6:1284 1293 PCB : paclitaxel coated balloon

Coating Integrity is Variable Lutonix 035 DCB (dry-expanded) 2000x In.Pact TM (dry expanded) 2000x SurVeil TM DCB (dry-expanded) 2000x

Zilver PTX Self-expanding nitinol stent No polymer or binder 3 µg/mm 2 dose density 6 x 20 mm : 220 µg, 10 x 80 mm : 880 µg of paclitaxel Zilver PTX 83.1% 67.6% Optimal PTA + BMS Michael D. Dake et al. Circulation.2016;133:1472-1483 Iida et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(8):1105-12.

Mean neointima thickness, mm Nakano et al. Eur Heart J 2013;34:3304-3313 Why clinical outcomes are different by location Above knee Self expanding Stents used <6 months following implantation >6-12 months following implantation Inter-strut distance increases as stent continues to expand resulting in decreasing drug availability between struts Efficacy Overall: r=0.446, p<0.001 1.2 1.0 Paclitaxel or Sirolimus (+Analogs) Tissue penetration of paclitaxel is greater than Sirolimus and its Analogs. THK mean 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Maximum normalized inter-strut Max Interstrut distance Paclitaxel Coated Balloons with excipient are efficacious because of paclitaxel crystallinity, greater penetration and use of excipient which allows for sustained release of drug.

Why clinical outcomes are different by location Below the knee Balloon Expandable Polymer coated Stents Just after implantation 6-12 months following implantation Sirolimus ±analog Paclitaxel Coated Balloon No change in interstrut distance and continued release of drug from polymer Efficacy Maintained Smaller arteries High dose, cytotoxic drug with uneven distribution and fibrin deposition Ineffective Distal embolization

Conclusions Two different types of antiproliferative drugs used for above and below the knee: Paclitaxel (cytotoxic), and Sirolimus+analogs (cytostatic). Above the Knee: Self expanding stents with sirolimus ±analogs were ineffective above the knee, because of continuous expansion of the stent, with time and decreased efficacy from poor drug penetration of sirolimus or analogs. Improvement of stent technology and use of paclitaxel which is a cytotoxic drug with greater inhibition of proliferation and drug penetration when applied on stent or balloon (with excipient) is efficacious. Balloon coating with excipient and paclitaxel (crystallinity) are essential for the success of drug coated balloons. Below the knee: Balloon expandable stents with sirolimus or analogs are efficacious in small vessel without anatomic demands because of size and continuous drug release form polymer over a long period. However, drug coated balloons carry high dose of cytotoxic paclitaxel applied on a small vessel with uneven distribution and greater fibrin deposition are ineffective in this setting

Acknowledgments Funding CVPath Institute Inc. CVPath Institute Sho Torii, MD Kazuyuki Yahagi, MD Hiroyoshi Mori, MD Emanuel Harari, MD Elena Ladich, MD Robert Kutz, MS Ed Acampado, DVM Youhui Liang, MD Abebe Atiso, HT Jinky Beyer Lila Adams, HT Frank D Kolodgie, PhD Liang Guo, PhD Renu Virmani, MD Washington DC My email: afinn@cvpath.org

Preclinical Evaluation in Animals Healthy animal models Suffolk Cross-bred sheep New Zealand White Rabbit Yucatan Minipig 160-180 cm 60-80 Kg 15-25 cm 5-10 Kg 40-60 cm 50-60 Kg 80-100 cm 80-100 Kg Coronary Coronary Coronary Peripheral Peripheral Peripheral Peripheral

Drug Coated Balloon Devices (Peripheral artery) Device Company Coating Drug dose (µg/mm 2 ) Advance 18 PTX Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA Paclitaxel 3.0 Yes Cotavance Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany Paclitaxel iopromide 3.0 Yes Freeway Eurocor, Bonn, Germany Paclitaxel shellac 3.0 Yes In.Pact Admiral, Medtronic Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA Paclitaxel urea 3.5 Yes Lutonix 035 DCB BARD, Murray Hill, NJ, USA Paclitaxel polysorbate/sorbitol 2.0 Yes Legflow Cardionovum, Warsaw, Poland Paclitaxel shellac 3.0 Yes CE mark * Passeo-18 Lux Biotronik, Bülach, Switzerland Paclitaxel butyryl-tri-hexyl citrate 3.0 No Yes Stellarex Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA Paclitaxel 2.0 No Yes SurVeil TM DCB SurModics, MN, USA Paclitaxel-proprietary photolink 2.0 No No FDA approval First in man in USA Clinical trial under FDA Byrne RA, Joner M. et al. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:13-23 Lutonix In.Pact SurModics ELUTAX Pantera Lux Sequent Please

Drug eluting devices: Why paclitaxel works above the knee and sirolimus below the knee, is the stent or the drug? Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA