Surgical Bypass vs. Zilver PTX stent for long SFA lesions : Interim results of the ZilverPass Trial

Similar documents
The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions

Surgical Bypass or. Zilver PTX. 12 months preliminary data. LINC 2016, Leipzig. Marc Bosiers, MD. Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions Preliminary report

Preliminary 6-month results of VMI-CFA trial

BIOLUX 4EVER : Combining Passeo-18 Lux DCB and Pulsar-18 BMS : 12 month results of full cohort

RELINE-trial : 24 months results with the Viabahn vs PTA for in-stent restenosis

Or is the ivolution stent a better alternative? EVOLUTION 12-month data

Which Stent Is Best for Various Femoropopliteal Anatomy? 2018 Pacific Northwest Endovascular Conference June 15-26, 2018 Seattle, WA

12-Month and preliminary 24-month outcomes of combining a DCB with a modern generation of nitinol stent in fem-pop lesions. BIOLUX 4EVER study

Does stent design influence the results of SFA stenting?

DCB + stent in the SFA

DCB level 1 evidence review

Zilver PTX Post-Market Surveillance Study of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Treating Femoropopliteal Artery Disease in Japan: 24-Month Results

Treatment Strategies for Long Lesions of greater than 20 cm

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

PES BTK 70 : 12 m results with a paclitaxelcoated self-expanding stent in BTK arteries

MEET M. Bosiers K. Deloose P. Peeters. SFA stenting in 2009 : The good and the ugly What factors influence patency?

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment

Disclosures. Rational Selection of Endovascular Options for the SFA and Popliteal: What Works Where and for How Long?

Future of stenting in the. Koen Deloose, MD Head Dept Vascular Surgery AZ Sint Blasius Dendermonde, Belgium

Long-term Zilver PTX Data from Japan: 5-year Results in the Real World

Treating in-stent occlusions with the Rotarex catheter : The ROBINSON study

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

Combination therapy : treatment rationale and clinical evidence

Update in femoral angioplasty & stenting PRO

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

How to perform CFA Supera deployment. Koen Deloose, MD Head Dept Vascular Surgery AZ Sint Blasius Dendermonde, Belgium

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Current Status and Limitations in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Comparison Of Primary Long Stenting Versus Primary Short Stenting For Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease (PARADE)

Cutting/scoring balloon Cryoplasty Drug-eluting balloon Brachytherapy Debulking Restent (BMS or DES) John R. Laird, MD

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

REACT Treatment Rationale and Clinical Evidence. ICI Meeting 5th of December 2017

XPEDITE Clinical Study PaclitaXel-coated Peripheral StEnts used In the Treatment of FemoropoplitEal Stenoses

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

Extreme SFA Lesions: DETOUR I 12- Month Results in Lesions >30cm. Sean Lyden, MD Chairman Vascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio

Real PTX RCT: 3 year data from a randomized comparison of DCB vs. DES in femoropopliteal lesions

SAVER: Rationale and merits for an all-comers DCB e-registry Frank Vermassen MD

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

Disclosures. Carotid artery stenting. Surveillance after Endovascular Intervention: When to Re-Intervene and What s the Evidence

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Merits and demerits of DES, DEB or covered stent in lower extremity arterial occlusive disease 성균관의과대학삼성서울병원순환기내과최승혁

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

The BATTLE Trial Comparing Bare Metal to Drug Eluting Stents for Intermediate Length Lesions of the SFA

Koen Keirse, MD RZ Tienen, Belgium

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Accurate Vessel Sizing Drives Clinical Results. IVUS In the Periphery

Lessons learnt from DES in the SFA is there any ideal concept so far?

Disclosures. In the DCB Era, How Do I Choose To Use a Stent? When to Stent and What Devices to Use in the SFA

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

The present status of selfexpanding. for CLI: Why and when to use. Sean P Lyden MD Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

Management of In-stent Restenosis after Lower Extremity Endovascular Procedures

The LIMBO trial: a RCT investigating adventitial dexamethasone infusion to prevent restenosis in BTK arteries utilizing a novel angiographic endpoint

ISR-treatment The Leipzig experience with purely mechanical debulking. Sven Bräunlich Department for Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Contemporary use of DCBs, Ranger clinical trial and investigator sponsored research

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice

Evidence-Based Optimal Treatment for SFA Disease

Evolving Role of Drug-Eluting Stents In Complex SFA - Majestic Trial Data

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

Adventitial Drug Infusion to Prevent Restenosis

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

Are RCT always needed: Experience with objective performance criteria (OPC)

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

Angiographic dissection pattern and patency outcomes of post balloon angioplasty for SFA lesions -a retrospective multi center analysis-

Comparing endoluminal bypass to open fem-pop bypasses; Final 1-year results of the SUPERB trial

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

Are DES and DEB worth the cost in BTK interventions?

EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Endovascular Therapy vs. Open Femoral Endarterectomy Rationale and Design of the Randomized PESTO Trial

DCB + BMS is not a DES

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

Femoropopliteal Above-Knee Bypass: The True Results

Plaque scoring in calcified lesions

Specificities for infrapopliteal stents

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Does heparin impregnated graft improve patency and reduce the cost of lower limb bypass? The REPLACE trial Y. Gouëffic, MD, PhD

SFA In-stent Restenosis

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

John E. Campbell, MD Assistant Professor of Surgery and Medicine Department of Vascular Surgery West Virginia University, Charleston Division

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty. Thomas Zeller MD Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg & Bad Krozingen, Germany

Transcription:

Surgical Bypass vs. Zilver PTX stent for long SFA lesions : Interim results of the ZilverPass Trial Dr. Koen Deloose Head of Vascular Surgery AZ Sint-Blasius Dendermonde Belgium

Disclosure slide Speaker name: Koen Deloose, MD I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Consulting: Medtronic, Spectranetics, Biotronik, Abbott, Bard ivascular, Bentley, Cook, GE Healthcare Employment in industry Stockholder of a healthcare company Owner of a healthcare company Other(s) I do not have any potential conflict of interest 2017 2

Patencies Zilver PTX LONG LESIONS Mean lesion length (mm) N = patients n = lesions 1yr PPR (%) PSVR ( V r) = PSV (jet) / PSV (prox segment) PSVR value (duplex US) Zilver PTX premarket SAS complex lesions Zilver PTX premarket SAS complex lesions Subcohort TASC C & D PSVR : 300/80 = 3,75 Zilver PTX Japanese PMS all comers 100,0 + 80,2 N = 787 n = 900 226,0 + 44,0 PSV prox segment Zilver PTX LL registry 189,3 + 91,1 140,7 + 90,7 N = 907 n = 1075 86,2 <2,5 N = 134 n = 135 77,6 <2,5 PSV jet N = 45 n = 45 Dake MD et al. J Endovasc Ther 2011;18:613-23 Bosiers M et al. J CardiVasc Surg 2013;54:115-22 86,4 <2,4 Yokoi H et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2016;9(3):271-77 86,1 <2,0 Presented byt Zeller @ LINC 2014, Leipzig, Germany 2017 3

Patencies Zilver PTX LONG LESIONS PSVR ( V r) = PSV (jet) / PSV (prox segment) Mean lesion length (mm) N = patients n = lesions 1yr PPR (%) PSVR value (duplex US) Zilver PTX premarket SAS complex lesions Zilver PTX premarket SAS complex lesions Subcohort TASC C & D Zilver PTX Japanese PMS all comers 100,0 + 80,2 N = 787 n = 900 226,0 + 44,0 Zilver PTX LL registry 189,3 + 91,1 140,7 + 90,7 N = 907 n = 1075 86,2 <2,5 N = 134 n = 135 77,6 <2,5 N = 45 n = 45 Dake MD et al. J Endovasc Ther 2011;18:613-23 Bosiers M et al. J CardiVasc Surg 2013;54:115-22 86,4 <2,4 Yokoi H et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2016;9(3):271-77 86,1 <2,0 Presented byt Zeller @ LINC 2014, Leipzig, Germany 2017 4

Patencies prosthetic bypass ATK First Author/yr Study type Population 1 yr Primary Patency McQuade et al/2009 J Vasc Surg 2009;49:109-16 Kedora J et al/ 2007 J Vasc Surg 2009;49:109-16 Jensen L et al/2007 Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007 ;34:44-49 Pereira C et al/2006 J Vasc Surg 2006;44:510-7 Prospective, randomized (stentgraft vs prosthetic ATK bypass) Prospective, randomized (stentgraft vs prosthetic ATK bypass) Prospective, randomized (Dacron vs PTFE ATK bypass) Meta-analysis (subgroup ATKprosthetic) Rutherford R et al. JVS 1997 (Sept);26(3):517-38 86 patients/100 limbs (1:1 RCT) 86 patients/100 limbs (1:1 RCT) 413 patients (216 Dacron vs 210 PTFE) Stentgraft : 72% Bypass : 77% Stentgraft : 73,5% Bypass 74,2% Dacron : 78% PTFE : 72% 3357 patients Claudicants : 85,3% CLI : 76,3% 2017 5

Difference in Primary Patency definition Surgical Assessing flow through the bypass: open or closed? Endovascular Absence of binary restenosis (PSV 2.0 ; 2,4 ; 2,5) Analysis of PSVR in 100 surgical, primary patent bypasses Total (N=100) Binary restenosis (N= 11)(PSVR >2,4) F-P1 37 3 F-P2 0 0 F-P3 47 6 F-tibial 16 2 2017 6

Let us randomize with the same assessment methods! ZILVERPASS STUDY : The Zilver PTX (Cook ) versus bypass surgery for the treatment of femoropopliteal TASC C&D lesions 2017 7

Let us randomize with the same assessment methods! prospective, multicenter, randomized 1:1 randomization 220 patients Tasc C & D lesions Zilver PTX Absence of binary restenosis/ occlusion within treated lesion (CFDU PSVR < 2,4) Without TLR within 12 months Belgium, Germany, Italy, Brazil PRIMARY ENDPOINT Surgical bypass Absence of binary restenosis/ occlusion @ proximal/distal anastomoses/over the entire length of bypass graft (CFDU PSVR < 2,4) Without clinically driven reintervention to restore flow in bypass. 2017 8

Let us randomize with the same assessment methods! TIME LINE screen proc disch 1 M 6 M 12 M 24 M Patient informed consent In- / exclusion criteria check Medical / clinical history Medication Physical examination Rutherford ABI Regular Angiography Regular Duplex Ultrasound Core Lab Duplex Ultrasound Adverse Events 191 patients enrolled! 2017 9

Let us randomize with the same assessment methods! Patient demographics Preliminary 115 patients Gender Rutherford Baseline Total ZILVER PTX BYPASS Signific Female 35 (30.4%) 17 (30.36%) 18 (30.51%) Male 80 (69.5%) 39 (69.64%) 41 (69.49%) 2 11 (9.57%) 8 (14.29%) 3 (5.08%) 3 65 (56.52%) 33 (58.93%) 32 (54.24%) 4 16 (13.91%) 4 (7.14%) 12 (20.34%) 5 23 (20.00%) 11 (19.64%) 12 (20.34%) Missing 0 0 0 Age (years) 69.08 + 9.52 70.18 + 10.26 68.04 + 8.72 P = 0.229 2017 10

Let us randomize with the same assessment methods! Lesion characteristics Preliminary 115 patients Stenosis % ; ± SD Lesion Length Mm ; ± SD ABI Baseline ± SD Total ZILVER PTX BYPASS Signific 98.95 ± 3.89 (N=115) 253.45 ± 71.22 (N=115) 0.594 ± 0.15 (N=115) 98.84 ± 4.16 (N=56) 239.71 ± 64.11 (N=56) 0.619 ± 0.14 (N=52) 99.07 ± 3.65 (N=59) 266.49 ± 75.61 (N=59) 0.570 ± 0.17 (N=53) P = 0.553 P = 0.114 P = 0.468 Procedural characteristics Total ZILVER PTX BYPASS Signific Duration Procedure Minutes ; ± SD 82.00 ± 40.86 (N=112) 56.37 ± 20.80 (N=54) 105.86 ± 40.59 (N= 58) P < 0.001 2017 11

Let us randomize with the same assessment methods! Preliminary 115 patients 77,4 % 67.8% 73.6 % 67.8% ZILVER PTX BYPASS Baseline 30 days 6MFU 12MFU D365 12MFU D-395 Tar 56 55 53 40 40 % 100 100 87.1 77.4 73.6 Tar 59 57 48 36 36 % 100 98.3 80.9 67.8 67.8 P = 0.6005 2017 12

Let us randomize with the same assessment methods! Preliminary 115 patients 84.6 % 74.4 % 84.6 % 74.4 % ZILVER PTX BYPASS Baseline 30 days 6MFU 12MFU D365 12MFU D-395 Tar 56 55 54 43 43 % 100 100 94.4 84.6 84.6 Tar 59 57 48 38 38 % 100 98.3 84.1 74.4 74.4 P = 0.2809 2017 13

Conclusions Zilver PTX is obtaining outstanding primary patencies, also in long & more complex SFA lesions Patency analysis in these study cohorts are based on (relatively) objective CFDU PSVR assessments Maybe Prosthetic Bypass results are not that great in terms of patency, as we, vascular surgeons, always considered, especially when you use an endovascular CFDU PSVR based patency assessment Randomized controled trials, like the ZILVERPASS, with the same assessments and methodologies in both arms need to clarify the situation. Preliminary results in 115 patients show at least a non-inferiority of Zilver PTX versus prosthetic bypass surgery ATK. 2017 14

Surgical Bypass vs. Zilver PTX stent for long SFA lesions : Interim results of the ZilverPass Trial Dr. Koen Deloose Head of Vascular Surgery AZ Sint-Blasius Dendermonde Belgium