Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

Similar documents
Quality Measures MIPS CV Specific

Ischemic Heart Disease Interventional Treatment

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

Ischemic Heart Disease Interventional Treatment

Supplement materials:

CORONARY: The Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Off or On Pump Revascularization Study. Results at 1 Year

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

Faculty/Presenter Disclosure

Evidence-Based Management of CAD: Last Decade Trials and Updated Guidelines

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Strategy in Patients with Non-ST Elevation ACS

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Supplementary Online Content

EACTS Adult Cardiac Database

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

ASCEND Randomized placebo-controlled trial of aspirin 100 mg daily in 15,480 patients with diabetes and no baseline cardiovascular disease

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) Long Term Outcomes

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Supplementary Online Content

DUKECATHR Dataset Dictionary

TICAGRELOR VERSUS CLOPIDOGREL AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST- ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Disclosures The PREVENT IV Trial was supported by Corgentech and Bristol-Myers Squibb

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Declaration of conflict of interest NONE

Summary Protocol ISRCTN / NCT REVIVED-BCIS2 Summary protocol version 4, May 2015 Page 1 of 6

Clinical Considerations of High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)

Toledo Hospital Clinical Quality Indicators. Effective - Heart Attack

Intraoperative application of Cytosorb in cardiac surgery

COAGULATION, BLEEDING, AND TRANSFUSION IN URGENT AND EMERGENCY CORONARY SURGERY

CPORT E Trial. Atlantic C PORT

Hypothesis: When compared to conventional balloon angioplasty, cryoplasty post-dilation decreases the risk of SFA nses in-stent restenosis

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

CONTEMPORARY USE OF ARTERIAL GRAFTS DURING CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY: PARADIGM SHIFT? OR A LITTLE (MORE) TALK THAT NEEDS A LOT MORE ACTION

FEV1 predicts length of stay and in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Disclosures. No disclosures to report

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

Advances in Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. No disclosure or conflicts. Outline

ESC Congress 2011 SIMULTANEOUS HYBRID REVASCULARIZATION OF CAROTID AND CORONARY DISEASE INITIAL RESULTS OF A NEW THERAPEUTIC APPROACH

Paris, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators

To provide information on the use of acetyl salicylic acid in the treatment and prevention of vascular events.

Downloaded from:

'Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndromes: perioperative strategies to improve outcome'

Supplementary Online Content

REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: a prospective cohort study

Surgical Consensus Standards Endorsement Maintenance NQF-Endorsed Surgical Maintenance Standards (Phase I) Table of Contents

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 60 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin use

Supplementary Online Content

Coronary Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China 10-Year Results From the China PEACE-Retrospective CathPCI Study

Case Report Left Main Stenosis. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)?

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetics: All Arterial or Hybrid?

Chapter 4: Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With CKD

Type of intervention Treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

The MAIN-COMPARE Registry

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT (CABG) MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study appears to have been conducted in the UK.

8/28/2018. Pre-op Evaluation for non cardiac surgery. A quick review from 2007!! Disclosures. John Steuter, MD. None

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

Supplementary Online Content

The Muscatine Study Heart Health Survey

Incremental Value of Multiple Arterial conduits in CABG

Treatment Options for Angina

DESCRIPTION: Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older undergoing isolated CABG surgery who received an IMA graft

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

SURGICAL MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION: ARTERIAL VS VENOUS GRAFTS, SINGLE VS MULTIPLE GRAFTS?

Marc Albert, Adrian Ursulescu, Ulrich FW Franke Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Transcatheter Echo Guided Mitral Valve Repair with NeoChord Implantation: Results from NeoChord Independent International Registry

Mild Hypothermia in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction the Randomized SHOCK-COOL Trial

Is bypass surgery needed for elderly patients with LMT disease? From the surgical point of view

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATelet Inhibition and patient Outcomes trial

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

This information explains the advice about the care and treatment of people with stable angina that is set out in NICE clinical guideline 126.

Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts

HEART AND SOUL STUDY OUTCOME EVENT - MORBIDITY REVIEW FORM

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

OUTPATIENT ANTITHROMBOTIC MANAGEMENT POST NON-ST ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. TARGET AUDIENCE: All Canadian health care professionals.

Michael Mack, M.D. Baylor Healthcare System Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Dallas, TX

Experience with 500 Stentless Aortic Valve Replacements

Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts

ARIC HEART FAILURE HOSPITAL RECORD ABSTRACTION FORM. General Instructions: ID NUMBER: FORM NAME: H F A DATE: 10/13/2017 VERSION: CONTACT YEAR NUMBER:

Chapter 4: Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with CKD

National Vascular Registry

Predictive Ability of Novel Cardiac Biomarkers ST2, Galectin-3, and NT-ProBNP Before Cardiac Surgery

Impact of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 SNPs on outcomes with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes: a PLATO genetic substudy

Robotic Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Measurement Name Beta-Blocker Therapy Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI)

Ticagrelor vs prasugrel in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Table S1. Read and ICD 10 diagnosis codes for polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

The Author(s) This article is published with open access by ASEAN Federation of Cardiology

Transcription:

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial Embargoed until 10:45 a.m. CT, Monday, Nov. 14, 2016 David Taggart Professor of Cardiac Surgery University of Oxford, UK On behalf of Arterial Revascularization Trial investigators

Funding and declarations No conflicts of interest declared by presenter Funded by UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, UK National Institute of Health Research Efficacy and Mechanistic Evaluation Sponsored by University of Oxford, UK Design, conduct and analysis conducted independently of funding agencies and sponsor Authors (David Taggart, Doug Altman, Alastair Gray, Belinda Lees, Stephen Gerry, Umberto Benedetto, Marcus Flather) take full responsibility for conduct and results from the trial Presented on behalf of all investigators and patients participating in ART

Background Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is effective for management of symptomatic multi-vessel coronary artery disease Left internal mammary artery has excellent long term patency rates and is established as standard of care for CABG Evidence that vein grafts fail over time especially >5 years Long term excellent patency of the right internal mammary Observational studies have estimated up to 20% reduction in mortality with bilateral versus single mammary artery grafts

Design and outcome measures Randomized multi-center comparison of left internal mammary artery (plus vein grafts) versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting on All-cause mortality at five years (interim outcome: this analysis) Sternal wound complications All-cause mortality at ten years (primary outcome) Mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke at five and ten years (secondary outcomes)

Sample size Estimated that bilateral internal mammary artery grafting would result in an absolute 5% reduction in 10-year mortality (i.e. from 25% to 20%) compared with single internal mammary artery grafting. To detect this expected reduction with 90% power at the 5% significance level requires 2928 patients. Aim was to enrol at least 3000 patients (1500 in each arm) over a 2- to 3-year recruitment period.

Eligibility INCLUSION Patients with symptomatic multi-vessel coronary artery disease scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting (including urgent cases and planned off pump surgery) EXCLUSIONS Single graft planned Redo CABG Evolving myocardial infarction Concomitant valve surgery

Results Enrolment from June 2004 to December 2007 28 cardiac surgery centres 7 countries (UK, Poland, Australia, Brazil, India, Italy, Austria) 3102 patients in total 1554 patients randomized to the single-graft group 1548 to the bilateral-graft group Use of aspirin (89%), statins (89%), ACE-inhibitor/ Angiotensin receptor blockers (73%), beta blockers (75%) at 5 years

Patient flow Randomized patients n= 3102 Allocated single mammary n= 1554 Allocated bilateral mammary n= 1548 Received surgery, n= 1546 (99.5%) Single mammary n= 1494 Bilateral mammary n= 38 Other n = 14 Did not receive surgery n= 8-1 died prior to surgery* - 2 surgery cancelled - 1 had PCI - 4 withdrew from trial* Received surgery, n= 1531 (98.9%) Bilateral mammary n= 1294 Single mammary n= 215 Other n = 22 Did not receive surgery n= 16-1 died prior to surgery* - 3 surgery cancelled - 3 withdrew from surgery - 1 had PCI - 8 withdrew from trial* Treatment received unknown, n=1 129 Died ** 62 lost to follow up by 5 years ** 9 Withdrew ** 133 Died ** 71 lost to follow up by 5 years ** 5 Withdrew** Known to be alive at 5 years n= 1349 ** Known to be alive at 5 years, n= 1330**

Baseline characteristics Single mammary (n=1554) Bilateral mammary (n=1548) Male [n (%)] 1338 (86.1%) 1318 (85.1%) Mean (SD) age at randomization, years 63.5 (9.1) 63.7 (8.7) Smoking status [n (%)] Current smoker 214 (13.8%) 237 (15.3%) Ex-smoker 898 (57.8%) 834 (53.9%) Never smoked 442 (28.4%) 477 (30.8%) Ethnic origin [n (%)] Caucasian 1431 (92.1%) 1418 (91.6%) East Asian 1 (0.1%) 5 (0.3%) South Asian 76 (4.9%) 74 (4.8%) Afro-Caribbean 2 (0.1%) 0 African 1 (0.1%) 4 (0.3%) Other 42 (2.7%) 47 (3.0%) Mean (SD) height [cm] 170.4 (8.4) 170.0 (8.5) Mean (SD) weight [kg] 81.9 (14.2) 82.0 (13.5) Mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) 28.1 (4.1) 28.3 (4.0) Mean (SD) systolic blood pressure [mmhg] 131.8 (18.5) 131.7 (18.0) Mean(SD) diastolic blood pressure [mmhg] 74.8 (11.1) 75.0 (11.0) Diabetes [n (%)] No history 1191 (76.6%) 1177 (76.0%) Insulin dependent diabetes 79 (5.1%) 95 (6.1%) Non insulin dependent diabetes 284 (18.3%) 276 (17.8%) Hypertension treated with drugs [n (%)] 1217 (78.3%) 1193 (77.1%) Hyperlipidemia treated with drugs [n (%)] 1448 (93.2%) 1457 (94.1%) Documented peripheral arterial disease [n 118 (7.6%) 103 (6.6%) (%)] Documented transient ischemic attack [n 57 (3.7%) 53 (3.4%) (%)] Prior stroke [n (%)] 48 (3.1%) 42 (2.7%) Prior myocardial infarction [n (%)] 681 (43.8%) 619 (40.0%) Prior percutaneous coronary intervention ± 248 (16.0%) 242 (15.6%) stent [n (%)] NYHA class [n (%)] 1 and 2 1228 (79%) 1203 (78%) CCS class [n (%)] 1-3 1304 (84%) 1298 (84%)

Surgical details, post-op care and length of stay Procedures Single mammary artery Bilateral mammary artery Details of operation (n=1546) (n=1531) On pump 928 (60.0%) 890 (58.1%) Off pump 618 (40.0%) 641 (41.9%) Intra-operative conversions to bypass 13/618 (2.1%) 15/641 (2.3%) Mean (SD) duration of operation, mins 199 (58) 222 (61) Number of vessels grafted (n=1546) (n=1530) 1 11 (0.7%) 8 (0.5%) 2 273 (17.7%) 272 (17.8%) 3 749 (48.54%) 771 (50.4%) 4+ 513 (33.2%) 479 (31.3%) Aprotinin started during surgery 372/1545 (24.1%) 368/1531 (24.0%) Aprotinin given after surgery 89/1545 (5.8%) 98/1530 (6.4%) Blood transfusion 184/1515 (12.2%) 179/1492 (12.0%) Median (IQR) blood (red cells) 500 (300 to 600)) 500 (300 to600) Platelets 35/1512 (2.3%) 46/1494 (3.1%) Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) 53/1513 (3.5%) 66/1493 (4.4%) Cell saver 474/1500 (31.6%) 461/1479 (31.2%) Immediate post-operative period Return to theatre and reason 54/1546 (3.5%) 66/1532 (4.3%) Bleeding 44 51 Tamponade 2 6 Other 8 9 Unknown 3 6 Intra-aortic balloon pump used (IABP) 57/1546 (3.7%) 68/1532 (4.4%) Renal support therapy 68/1545 (4.4%) 91/1532 (5.9%) (n=1539) (n=1524) Mean (SD) Duration of ventilation (min) 863 (3293) 968 (3029) ITU admissions: 0 8 (0.6%) 8 (0.6%) 1 1390 (96.1%) 1362 (95.3%) Mean (SD) ITU length of stay (hours) 38 (106) 41 (94) Mean (SD) HDU length of stay (days) 2 (3.7) 2 (3.8) Mean (SD) post op hospital stay (days) 7.5 (7.6) 8.0 (7.4)

All cause mortality (%) All cause mortality at 5 years 100 90 80 70 10 8 6 60 50 4 40 2 30 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 10 0 Number at risk Single mammary Bilateral mammary 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time from randomization (years) 1554 (37) 1502 (24) 1467 (22) 1435 (24) 1389 (23) 1332 1548 (38) 1496 (18) 1468 (28) 1425 (29) 1370 (21) 1321 Single mammary Bilateral mammary

Death, myocardial infarction or stroke at 5 years Death / myocardial infarction / stroke (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 15 10 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time from randomization (years) Number at risk Single mammary Bilateral mammary 1554 (91) 1448 (27) 1410 (29) 1371 (28) 1322 (29) 1261 1548 (82) 1452 (20) 1422 (36) 1373 (32) 1317 (26) 1266 Single mammary Bilateral mammary

Clinical outcomes and adverse events Clinical Outcomes Single mammary (n=1554) Bilateral mammary (n=1548) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Primary - Mortality 130 (8.4%) 134 (8.7%) 1.04 (0.81, 1.32) 0.77 Composite Death, myocardial infarction, stroke 198 (12.7%) 189 (12.2%) 0.96 (0.79, 1.17) 0.69 Myocardial infarction* 54 (3.5%) 52 (3.4%) 0.97 (0.66, 1.41) 0.86 P value Stroke* 49 (3.2%) 38 (2.5%) 0.78 (0.51, 1.19) 0.24 Adverse events Major Bleed 41 (2.6%) 48 (3.1%) 1.18 (0.78, 1.77) 0.44 Repeat Revascularisation Sternal wound complication Sternal wound reconstruction 103 (6.6%) 101 (6.5%) 0.98 (0.76, 1.28) 0.91 29 (1.9%) 54 (3.5%) 1.87 (1.20, 2.92) 0.005 10 (0.6%) 29 (1.9%) 2.91 (1.42, 5.95) 0.002

Summary: five year analysis of arterial revascularization trial No significant differences in all cause mortality No significant differences in composite of mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke Early excess of sternal wound complications with bilateral mammary artery grafting No significant differences in major bleeds, need for repeat revascularization, angina status and quality-of-life measures (QoL data not shown) These data demonstrate medium term safety of bilateral mammary approach

Discussion 5 year outcomes comparing single versus bilateral mammary artery grafting does not show any significant differences on clinical outcomes with an early excess of sternal wound complications Approximately 14% of patients assigned bilateral mammary group received a single mammary artery only This is an interim analysis which has limited power to detect differences in clinical outcomes Longer term follow up will determine if there are benefits from the bilateral mammary approach On line publication in New England Journal of Medicine 14 November 2016 Taggart et al