GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

Similar documents
egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Galectin-3 (Gal-3) belongs to a family of soluble

Online Appendix (JACC )

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Central pressures and prediction of cardiovascular events in erectile dysfunction patients

Supplementary Appendix

Supplementary Table 1. Baseline Characteristics by Quintiles of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures

Supplementary Online Content

Cardiovascular Health Practice Guideline Outpatient Management of Coronary Artery Disease 2003

Impact of coronary atherosclerotic burden on clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

Relationship between body mass index, coronary disease extension and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

New evidences in heart failure: the GISSI-HF trial. Aldo P Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

Disclosures. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management. Learning Objectives. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Module 2. Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Reduction in Women with Hypertension

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 60 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin use

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Supplementary Online Content

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

Serum levels of galectin-1, galectin-3, and galectin-9 are associated with large artery atherosclerotic

Supplementary Online Content

(n=6279). Continuous variables are reported as mean with 95% confidence interval and T1 T2 T3. Number of subjects

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Cardiovascular Diabetology. Open Access ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. C. R. L. Cardoso 1, N. C. Leite 1, C. B. M. Moram 2 and G. F.

Spotty Calcification as a Marker of Accelerated Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis : Insights from Serial Intravascular Ultrasound

Guidelines on cardiovascular risk assessment and management

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

2003 World Health Organization (WHO) / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) Statement on Management of Hypertension.

PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF OSTEOPROTEGERIN IN CHRONIC HEART FAILURE: THE GISSI-HF TRIAL

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

HFpEF, Mito or Realidad?

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Appendix This appendix was part of the submitted manuscript and has been peer reviewed. It is posted as supplied by the authors.

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

Supplementary Material. Serum Chloride is an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Hypertensive Patients

Autonomic nervous system, inflammation and preclinical carotid atherosclerosis in depressed subjects with coronary risk factors

Cedars Sinai Diabetes. Michael A. Weber

How Low Do We Go? Update on Hypertension

APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Long-Term Complications of Diabetes Mellitus Macrovascular Complication

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Long-term prognostic value of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) changes within one year in patients with coronary heart disease

Supplementary Appendix

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

Supplementary Online Content

Supplement materials:

VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension - Pocket Guide Update 2004 Revision July 2005

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. Supplementary Table 1. Baseline Patient Characteristics

Hospital and 1-year outcome after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

Aldosterone Antagonism in Heart Failure: Now for all Patients?

An integrated approach for identifying patients who are at

In-Ho Chae. Seoul National University College of Medicine

4/4/17 HYPERTENSION TARGETS: WHAT DO WE DO NOW? SET THE STAGE BP IN CLINICAL TRIALS?

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Correlation of novel cardiac marker

Treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk: multifactorial management

Reducing CVD globally through combination approaches to prevention: the polypill. Salim Yusuf

Clinical Recommendations: Patients with Periodontitis

Performance and Quality Measures 1. NQF Measure Number. Coronary Artery Disease Measure Set

Program Metrics. New Unique ID. Old Unique ID. Metric Set Metric Name Description. Old Metric Name

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

DISCLOSURES OUTLINE OUTLINE 9/29/2014 ANTI-HYPERTENSIVE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 35, No. 5, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /00/$20.

Lipid Management 2013 Statin Benefit Groups

Lack of Effect of Beta-blocker Therapy in Patients with ST-elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction in PCI Era

Beta-blockers for coronary heart disease in chronic kidney disease

Supplemental table 1. Dietary sources of protein among 2441 men from the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study MEAT DAIRY OTHER ANIMAL

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Acute Coronary Syndrome patients with Renal Dysfunction

Central hemodynamics and prediction of cardiovascular events in patients with erectile dysfunction

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

Small dense low-density lipoprotein is a risk for coronary artery disease in an urban Japanese cohort: The Suita study

Coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors

Abstract ESC Pisa

Therapeutic Targets and Interventions

Update on Current Trends in Hypertension Management

2016 Internal Medicine Preferred Specialty Measure Set

hypertension Head of prevention and control of CVD disease office Ministry of heath

Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Frank J. Green, M.D., F.A.C.C. St. Vincent Medical Group

SITA 100 mg (n = 378)

Galectin-3 (Gal-3) belongs to a family of soluble

The ESC Registry on Chronic Ischemic Coronary Disease

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Practice Guidelines

EDMS #4298 Version 1.0

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

The Diabetes Link to Heart Disease

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Long-Term Outcome in Coronary Bypass Candidates Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Revascularization in Severe LV Dysfunction: The Role of Inducible Ischemia and Viability Testing

Supplementary Online Content

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

UTHEALTH HOUSTON CCTS BIOBANK VARIABLE LIST

Transcription:

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS Table of Contents List of authors pag 2 Supplemental figure I pag 3 Supplemental figure II pag 4 Supplemental figure III pag 5 Supplemental figure IV pag 6 Supplemental figure V pag 7 Supplemental figure VI pag 8 Supplemental table I pag 9 Supplemental table II pag 10 Supplemental table III pag 11 Supplemental table IV pag 12 Supplemental table V pag 13 Supplemental table VI pag 14 Supplemental table VII pag 15 Supplemental table VIII pag 16 Supplemental table IX pag 17

Giuseppe Maiolino* 2, MD, PhD, Giacomo Rossitto* 2, MD, Luigi Pedon 1, MD, Maurizio Cesari 2, MD, PhD, Anna Chiara Frigo 3, MS, Matteo Azzolini 2, MD, Mario Plebani 4, MD, Gian Paolo Rossi 2, MD. 1 Divisione di Cardiologia Ospedale di Cittadella, Italy 2 Dept. of Medicine -Internal Medicine 4 University of Padua, Italy 3 Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Italy 4 Dept. of Medicine - Laboratory Medicine University of Padua, Italy SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Figures 6, Tables 9 There is no conflict of interest and no financial disclosure concerning this manuscript to be disclosed. * These Authors have equally contributed to this manuscript. Correspondence to: Prof. Gian Paolo Rossi, MD. FACC, FAHA. DIMED- Clinica Medica 4 University Hospital via Giustiniani, 2 35126 Padova, Italy phone: 39-(0)49-821-7821 or 2279 Fax: 39-49-880-2252 E-mail: gianpaolo.rossi@unipd.it 2

Fig. I suppl: Occurrence of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in the whole cohort (top), CAD patients (mid) and CAD patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (bottom). Kaplan-Meier curves for AMI in the high (dashed line), mid (dotted line) and low (solid line) Gal-3 tertiles. 3

Fig. II suppl: Occurrence of Stroke in the whole cohort (top), CAD patients (mid) and CAD patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (bottom). Kaplan-Meier curves for Stroke in the high (dashed line), mid (dotted line) and low (solid line) Gal-3 tertiles. 4

Fig. III supplemental: Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for Galectin-3. The ROC analysis for Gal-3 showed a c-statistic of 0.689 (p < 0.0001) (solid line) with a 95% confidence interval of 0.654-0.722 (dotted lines). Y.I.: Youden Index. 5

Fig. IV suppl: Cardiovascular events, CAD patients. Cardiovascular death and events rate in patients with angiographically documented CAD by tertiles of Gal-3 (the absolute number of events is shown above each column). CV deaths X 2 = 26.3, p < 0.001; CV events X 2 = 6.1, p = 0.047; Fatal ischemic events X 2 = 7.8, p = 0.02. CV: cardiovascular. 6

Fig. V suppl: Cardiovascular deaths (top), CV events (mid), and fatal ischemic events (bottom) in the CAD patients. Kaplan-Meier curves show that patients in the high Gal-3 tertile (dashed line) had a significantly higher cardiovascular (CV) deaths, CV events, and fatal ischemic events than the patients in the mid (dotted line) and low (solid line) Gal-3 tertiles. 7

Fig. VI suppl: Cardiovascular events, CAD patients with preserved LVEF. Cardiovascular death and events rate in patients with angiographically proven CAD and preserved LVEF (> 50%) by tertiles of Gal-3 (the absolute number of events is shown above each column). CV deaths X 2 = 4.2, p = 0.118; CV events X 2 = 1.5, p = 0.473; Fatal ischemic events X 2 = 5.0, p = 0.081. CV: cardiovascular. 8

Galectin- 3 Tertile Variable 1 (n=348, 34.4%) 2 (n=329, 32.5%) 3 (n=336, 33.2%) P Clinical condition/hx (%) Hx of stroke 4 (1.2) 5 (1.5) 9 (2.7) = 0.293 Hx of AMI 105 (30.2) 120 (36.6) 124 (36.9) = 0.112 Hx of Bypass 35 (10.1) 32 (9.7) 29 (8.7) = 0.811 Hx of PTCA 34 (9.8) 23 (7.1) 14 (4.2) = 0.016 Medications at baseline (%) Statins 110 (32.3) 95 (29.1) 105 (31.8) = 0.645 Oral antiplatelet agents 252 (73.9) 237 (72.7) 220 (66.7) = 0.088 Calcium channel blockers 136 (39.9) 128 (39.3) 113 (34.2) = 0.259 Beta- blockers 142 (41.6) 122 (37.4) 116 (35.2) = 0.213 ACE inhibitors 138 (40.5) 140 (42.9) 186 (56.4) < 0.001 Heparin 67 (19.6) 84 (25.8) 60 (18.2) = 0.041 Diuretics 69 (20.2) 97 (29.8) 161 (48.8) < 0.001 Digoxin 25 (7.3) 35 (10.7) 60 (18.2) < 0.001 Supplemental Table I. Past medical history and medications at baseline of the whole cohort classified by Galectin-3 tertiles. Results are expressed as absolute number (percentage); comparisons across Galectin-3 tertiles were made by Χ 2. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; Bypass, coronary artery bypass; Hx, history; PTCA, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme. n = 1013. 9

Galectin- 3 Tertile: CAD Patients Variable 1 (n=267, 34.2%) 2 (n=255, 32.6%) 3 (n=260, 33.2%) P Age (yrs) 61 [54-67]* 65 [57-71] # 69 [63-74] <0.001 Gender M (%) 240 (89.9) 203 (79.6) 193 (74.2) <0.001 Risk factors Non- Smokers/Smokers/Ex (%) 85/51/130 (32/19/49) 96/36/123 (38/14/48) 97/35/128 (37/14/49) =0.306 Hypertension (%)* 142 (53.0) 156 (61.2) 171 (65.8) =0.018 Systolic BP (mmhg) 133 ± 18 135 ± 18 134 ± 18 0.214 Diastolic Diastolic BP (mmhg) BP (mmhg) 78 ± 10 77 ± 9 78 ± 10 0.237 Diabetes (%) 36 (13.5) 37 (14.7) 54 (20.9) =0.021 BMI (Kg/m 2 ) 26.7 ± 3.1 27.0 ± 4.0 26.8 ± 3.6 =0.156 Heart disease Left Ventricular EF (%) 65 [56-71] 64 [54-72] # 59 [47-68] <0.001 Atherosclerotic burden (Duke score) 32 [23-48] 37 [23-48] 37 [23-48] =0.022 Serum Creatinine (µμmol/l) 88 [71-97] 88 [71-97] # 96 [80-115] <0.001 egfr (ml/min) 87.5 ± 26.7* 79.9 ± 24.9 # 70.9 ± 30.5 <0.001 Serum K + (mmol/l) 4.2 ± 0.4 4.2 ± 0.4 4.3 ± 0.5 =0.012 Serum Na + (mmol/l) 140 ± 2 140 ± 2 139 ± 3 <0.001 Serum Glucose (mmol/l) 6.2 ± 2.1 6.2 ± 1.9 6.6 ± 2.3 =0.084 Total Cholesterol (mg/dl) 202 [181-237] 206 [177-234] 199 [173-226] =0.035 HDL- Cholesterol (mg/dl) 46 [40-51] 46 [40-52] # 43 [36-49] =0.003 LDL- Cholesterol (mg/dl) 131 [114-157] 131 [111-154] 131 [109-144] =0.014 Triglycerides (mg/dl) 126 [91-169] 122 [90-163] 126 [93-175] =0.503 Homocysteine (µμmol/l) 11.7 ± 7.2 12.3 ± 7.0 # 14.5 ± 8.5 <0.001 Supplemental Table II. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the CAD subjects classified by Galectin-3 tertiles (n=782). Results are expressed as mean ± SD, absolute numbers (percentage), or median and interquartile range; comparisons across Galectin-3 tertiles were made by ANOVA and Bonferroni tests, after log or square root transformation if needed, or Χ 2, as appropriate. BMI, body mass index; egfr, estimated glomerular filtration rate; K +, potassium; Na +, sodium; BP, Blood Pressure; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; EF, ejection fraction. Bonferroni test: * I vs II tertile, # II vs III tertile, I vs III tertile. P < 0.05 for significance. *Systolic and diastolic BP and BMI values did not differ across Gal-3 tertiles. 10

Galectin- 3 Tertile - CAD patients Variable 1 (n=267, 34.2%) 2 (n=255, 32.6%) 3 (n=260, 33.2%) P Clinical condition/hx (%) Hx of stroke 3 (1.1) 5 (2.0) 5 (1.9) = 0.695 Hx of AMI 93 (34.7) 108 (42.5) 123 (47.3) = 0.012 Hx of Bypass 30 (11.2) 34 (13.3) 26 (10.0) = 0.496 Hx of PTCA 31 (11.7) 22 (8.7) 14 (5.4) = 0.040 Medications at baseline (%) Statins 97 (36.9) 86 (34.0) 94 (36.6) = 0.756 Oral antiplatelet agents 216 (82.1) 201 (79.4) 201 (78.2) = 0.521 Calcium channel blockers 114 (43.3) 108 (42.7) 95 (37.0) = 0.269 Beta- blockers 124 (47.1) 102 (40.3) 106 (41.2) = 0.233 ACE inhibitors 96 (36.5) 103 (40.7) 139 (54.1) < 0.001 Heparin 56 (21.3) 68 (26.9) 55 (21.4) = 0.231 Diuretics 39 (14.8) 62 (24.5) 107 (41.6) < 0.001 Digoxin 10 (3.8) 15 (5.9) 31 (12.1) = 0.001 Supplemental Table III. Past medical history and medications at baseline of the CAD patients classified by Galectin-3 tertiles. Results are expressed as absolute number (percentage); comparisons across Galectin-3 tertiles were made by Χ 2. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; Bypass, coronary artery bypass; Hx, history; PTCA, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme. N = 782. 11

Galectin- 3 Tertile - CAD pts with LVEF > 50% Variable 1 (n=199, 33.4%) 2 (n=201, 33.8%) 3 (n=195, 32.8%) P Clinical condition/hx (%) Hx of stroke 0 (0.0) 5 (2.5) 4 (2.1) = 0.097 Hx of AMI 59 (29.6) 66 (32.8) 71 (36.4) = 0.361 Hx of Bypass 20 (10.1) 26 (12.9) 19 (9.7) = 0.535 Hx of PTCA 23 (11.7) 21 (10.4) 12 (6.2) = 0.151 Medications at baseline (%) Statins 70 (36.1) 72 (35.8) 64 (33.0) = 0.777 Oral antiplatelet agents 159 (82.0) 164 (81.6) 158 (81.4) = 0.991 Calcium channel blockers 96 (49.5) 97 (48.3) 86 (44.3) = 0.568 Beta- blockers 90 (46.4) 87 (43.3) 84 (43.3) = 0.776 ACE inhibitors 62 (32.0) 70 (34.8) 93 (47.9) = 0.003 Heparin 43 (22.2) 47 (23.4) 45 (23.2) = 0.953 Diuretics 22 (11.3) 38 (18.9) 58 (29.9) < 0.001 Digoxin 5 (2.6) 7 (3.5) 16 (8.2) = 0.019 Supplemental Table IV. Past medical history and medications at baseline of the CAD patients with preserved LVEF classified by Galectin-3 tertiles. Results are expressed as absolute number (percentage); comparisons across Galectin-3 tertiles were made by Χ 2. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; Bypass, coronary artery bypass; Hx, history; PTCA, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme. 12

Follow- up cases available vs lost Overall model statistics Adjusted R 2 = 0.011 F = 1.246 p = 0.181 Variables in the model β P Variables in the model β P Age - 0.040.453 Left Ventricular EF (%) 0.077.106 Gender 0.034.479 Atherosclerotic burden (Duke score) 0.039.378 Smoke (0N1Y) - 0.039.395 Hx of AMI 0.063.180 BMI 0.026.574 Hx of Bypass - 0.065.123 egfr - 0.011.843 Hx of PTCA - 0.041.317 Serum K + (mmol/l) - 0.074.089 Hx of Diabetes 0.021.712 Serum Na + (mmol/l) 0.073.094 Statins 0.041.339 Serum Glucose (mmol/l) 0.029.619 Oral antiplatelet agents - 0.022.606 HDL- Cholesterol (mg/dl) LDL- Cholesterol (mg/dl) 0.055.198 Beta- blockers 0.005.905-0.040.346 ACE inhibitors 0.003.948 Triglycerides (mg/dl) 0.055.200 Heparin 0.017.714 Systolic Blood Pressure (mmhg) Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmhg) - 0.031.584 Diuretics - 0.018.697-0.049.390 Digoxin 0.005.910 Gal- 3-0.025.591 Supplemental Table V. Multiple regression analysis showing no difference between cases lost and those available at follow-up 13

CV Events HR 95%CI Wald P Model 1 Age ( increase) 1.22 (1.03-1.45) 5.04 = 0.025 LVEF ( increase ) 0.80 (0.70-0.91) 11.07 = 0.001 CAD Duke Index Score 1.12 (1.04-1.21) 9.86 = 0.002 s- K + 1.46 (1.01-2.11) 4.14 = 0.042 Tot cholesterol (Ln increase) 0.39 (0.18-0.83) 5.92 = 0.015 Galectin- 3 (Ln increase) 1.15 (0.77-1.72) 0.447 = 0.504 Model 2 Age ( increase) 1.26 (1.06-1.49) 6.99 = 0.008 LVEF ( increase ) 0.76 (0.67-0.86) 18.83 < 0.001 CAD Duke Index Score 1.09 (1.02-1.17) 6.70 = 0.010 s- K + 1.43 (1.00-2.05) 3.84 = 0.050 Tot cholesterol (Ln increase) 0.37 (0.17-0.77) 6.95 = 0.008 Galectin- 3 (Ln increase) 1.16 (0.78-1.73) 0.507 = 0.477 Supplemental Table VI. Predictors of CV events at Cox regression analysis. Model 1, adjusted for age; gender; left ventricular ejection fraction; coronary atherosclerotic burden (Duke score); total, HDL and LDL (high and low density lipoprotein, respectively) cholesterol; BMI (body mass index); hypertension; diabetes; serum sodium; serum potassium; egfr (estimated glomerular filtration rate); homocysteine; history of myocardial infarction, revascularization by PTCA (Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty), peripheral vascular disease; use of ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics, digoxin, heparin. Model 2, adjusted for aforementioned variables excluding drug therapy. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; s-na +, serum sodium; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme. P for significance < 0.05; n = 1013. 14

Fatal Ischemic Events HR 95%CI Wald P Model 1 Age ( increase) 1.73 (1.28-2.35) 12.43 < 0.001 s- Na + 0.87 (0.77-0.98) 5.00 = 0.025 Digoxin 3.55 (1.58-7.94) 9.38 = 0.002 ACE inhibitors 2.21 (1.05-4.63) 4.38 = 0.036 Heparin 0.27 (0.08-0.92) 4.40 = 0.036 Galectin- 3 (Ln increase) 2.28 (1.09-4.74) 4.81 = 0.028 Model 2 Age ( increase) 1.70 (1.29-2.25) 14.09 < 0.001 LVEF ( increase ) 0.70 (0.54-0.91) 6.88 = 0.009 Galectin- 3 (Ln increase) 2.03 (1.01-4.06) 3.94 = 0.047 Supplemental Table VII. Predictors of fatal ischemic events at Cox regression analysis. Model 1, adjusted for age; gender; left ventricular ejection fraction; coronary atherosclerotic burden (Duke score); HDL and LDL (high and low density lipoprotein cholesterol, respectively); BMI (body mass index); hypertension; diabetes; serum sodium; serum potassium; egfr (estimated glomerular filtration rate); homocysteine; history of myocardial infarction, revascularization by PTCA (Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty), peripheral vascular disease; use of ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics, digoxin, heparin. Model 2, adjusted for aforementioned variables excluding drug therapy. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; s-na +, serum sodium; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme. P for significance < 0.05; n = 1013. 15

Cardiovascular Mortality - CAD pts HR 95%CI Wald P = Model 1 Age ( increase ) 1.44 (1.12-1.87) 7.79 = 0.005 LVEF ( increase ) 0.68 (0.54-0.86) 10.23 = 0.001 CAD Duke Index Score 1.25 (1.04-1.49) 5.71 = 0.017 History of PTCA 2.43 (1.05-5.65) 4.28 = 0.039 Digoxin therapy 2.49 (1.21-5.16) 6.06 = 0.014 Galectin- 3 (Ln increase) 1.87 (1.04-3.33) 4.42 = 0.036 Model 2 Age ( increase) 1.55 (1.22-1.96) 13.01 < 0.001 LVEF ( increase ) 0.59 (0.47-0.74) 21.26 < 0.001 Diabetes 1.72 (1.01-2.92) 3.98 = 0.046 Galectin- 3 (1 Ln increase) 1.82 (1.04-3.20) 4.33 = 0.037 Supplemental Table VIII. Predictors of cardiovascular mortality at Cox regression analysis in CAD patients. Model 1, adjusted for age; gender; left ventricular ejection fraction; coronary atherosclerotic burden (Duke score); HDL and LDL (high and low density lipoprotein cholesterol, respectively); BMI (body mass index); hypertension; diabetes; serum sodium; serum potassium; egfr (estimated glomerular filtration rate); homocysteine; history of myocardial infarction, revascularization by PTCA, peripheral vascular disease; use of ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics, digoxin, heparin. Model 2, adjusted for aforementioned variables excluding drug therapy. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; CAD, coronary artery cardiovascular disease; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction, PTCA, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. P for significance < 0.05; n = 782. 16

Fatal Ischemic Events - CAD pts with LVEF > 50% HR 95%CI Wald P Model 1 History of PTCA 7.94 (2.38-26.32) 11.33 = 0.001 Digoxin 13.18 (2.72-62.50) 10.28 = 0.001 ACE inhibitors 3.88 (1.28-11.77) 5.70 = 0.017 Galectin- 3 (Ln increase) 5.44 (1.86-15.93) 9.53 = 0.002 Model 2 History of PTCA 5.99 (2.11-16.95) 11.36 = 0.001 Galectin- 3 (Ln increase) 5.65 (1.96-16.28) 10.29 = 0.001 Supplemental Table IX. Predictors of fatal ischemic events at Cox regression analysis in CAD patients with preserved ejection fraction. Model 1 adjusted for age; gender; left ventricular ejection fraction; coronary atherosclerotic burden (Duke score); HDL and LDL (high and low density lipoprotein cholesterol, respectively); BMI (body mass index); hypertension; diabetes; serum sodium; serum potassium; egfr(estimated glomerular filtration rate); homocysteine; history of myocardial infarction, revascularization by PTCA (Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty), peripheral vascular disease; use of ACE-inhibitor/ angiotensin-ii type-1 receptor blockers, beta-blockers, diuretics, digoxin, heparin. Model 2, adjusted for aforementioned variables excluding drug therapy. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. PTCA, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. P for significance < 0.05; n = 595. 17