S.H. Age: 15 Years 3 Months Diagnosis: Class I Nonextraction Severe crowding, very flat profile. Background:

Similar documents
Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

Class I. Clear Fixed Appliance vs. Aligner Treatment for Arch Development. Clinician: Dr. Stuart Frost, Phoenix, AZ Patient: A.M.

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Arch Development: Clear Fixed Appliance vs. Aligner Treatment

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

6. Timing for orthodontic force

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Orthos Article Revisited: Practice Efficiency & Profitability

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

System Orthodontic Treatment Program By Dr. Richard McLaughlin, Dr. John Bennett and Dr. Hugo Trevisi

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Honing Damon System Mechanics for the Ultimate in Efficiency and Excellence Jeff Kozlowski, DDS East Lyme, CT

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

RETENTION AND RELAPSE

Skeletal Class III patients can be some of the CASE STUDY. By Jeffery Gerhardt, DDS. Acceptable Results Likely. Poor Results Likely. Fig.

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

ortho case report Sagittal First international magazine of orthodontics By Dr. Luis Carrière Special Reprint

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Unilateral Horizontally Impacted Maxillary Canine and First Premolar Treated with a Double Archwire Technique

Comprehensive Orthodontic Diagnosis Align upper and lower arches is not a treatment plan!

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

Expansion/Arch Development

Case Report Orthodontic Replacement of Lost Permanent Molar with Neighbor Molar: A Six-Year Follow-Up

rocky mountain orthodontics functionaleducation

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Delta Force. Bracket System. Putting you in the driver s seat for ultimate control

TransForce 2. Arch Developer Appliances Clinical Cases. New Horizons In Orthodontics

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

Transverse malocclusion, posterior crossbite and severe discrepancy*

ALEXANDER DISCIPLINE

Mixed Dentition Treatment and Habits Therapy

With judicious treatment planning, the clinical

Archwire Insertion and Disengagement Instruments Technique Guide

Effective Tooth Movement Using Lingual Segmented Arch Mechanics Combined With Miniscrews

Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) prior to combined Le Fort I and sagittal osteotomies: A case report

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

THE MBT VERSATILE+ APPLIANCE SYSTEM

Class II correction with Invisalign - Combo treatments. Carriere Distalizer.

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

You. Fix. Could. This? Treatment solutions for typical and atypical adult relapse. 78 SEPTEMBER 2017 // orthotown.com

TOL

Segmental Orthodontics for the Correction of Cross Bites

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Dental Morphology and Vocabulary

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

INDICATIONS. Fixed Appliances are indicated when precise tooth movements are required

Treatment of a severe class II division 1 malocclusion with twin-block appliance

ISW for the treatment of adult anterior crossbite with severe crowding combined facial asymmetry case

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

A36-year-old female presented with a chief. THE JQUR1l6L CASE REPORT

Congenitally missing mandibular premolars treatment options for space closure. Educational aims and objectives. Expected outcomes

Plus Combines Traditional Twin Bracket Treatment With Self-Ligation Convenience

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

Correction of a maxillary canine-first premolar transposition using mini-implant anchorage

Crowding and protrusion treated by unusual extractions

MANAGEMENT OF CLASS II DIVISION 2 MALOCCLUSION AN INSIGHT

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

Fixed appliances II. Dr. Káldy Adrienn, Semmeweis University

Significant improvement with limited orthodontics anterior crossbite in an adult patient

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

New Class of Appliance

The stability of orthodontic treatment is a major

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

SPECIAL. The effects of eruption guidance and serial extraction on the developing dentition

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

Extractions of first permanent molars in orthodontics: Treatment planning, technical considerations and two clinical case reports

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

A Method for Stabilizing a Lingual Fixed Retainer in Place Prior to Bonding

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

Skeletal Anchorage for Orthodontic Correction of Severe Maxillary Protrusion after Previous Orthodontic Treatment

The Science Behind The System Clinical Abstracts, Volume 2

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

The management of impacted

Use of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports

Developing Facial Symmetry Using an Intraoral Device: A Case Report

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Ectopic upper canine associated to ectopic lower second bicuspid. Case report

Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

Transcription:

S.H. Age: 15 Years 3 Months Diagnosis: Class I Nonextraction Severe crowding, very flat profile Background: This case was selected to illustrate the long-term impact of treatment planning on the face and the periodontal considerations resulting from extensive crowding. Treatment planning cases like this one can be extremely challenging. This patient has a very obtuse nasolabial angle and lack of lateral facial support. With maturation, it is well established that the severity of the flat profile magnifies. Realizing the long-term implications on the profile, nonextraction therapy has always been desired but questionable due to the periodontal impact on the lower arch. With traditional mechanics, the lower incisors always severely tipped forward with an adverse impact on periodontium of the lower incisors. The periodontist who followed this case was astonished at how the bone and tissue responded to low-force/low friction therapy. Please carefully evaluate the close-up photographs of the anterior segments taken 10 months in retention. It is gratifying to be able to have a very positive impact on the face, the periodontium, and treat the case in 18 months 2 weeks with 10 appointments. 45

Facial Evaluation: 1. Obtuse nasolabial angle. 2. Prominent nose and chin. 3. Lack of lateral mid-face support. 4. Flat upper lip. 5. Concave profile. Radiographic Survey: Dentition Evaluation: 1. Severe collapse of upper and lower arches. 2. Severe lack of arch length and width in the maxilla and mandible. 3. Upper right and lower left cuspids totally blocked labially. Upper incisors over-erupted. 4. Minimal bone and tissue covering blocked-out cuspids. 5. Lower posterior teeth tipped lingually. 46

Treatment Objectives: Goal: To improve patient s facial support. Anticipate this profile as a fifty-year-old. This is the perfect example of Face Driven Treatment Planning (see Physiological adaptation). Design low-force treatment mechanics that will allow the orofacial muscles, bone, and tissue to influence where the teeth will move. Hopefully, the tongue will normalize its position as this new physiologic tooth position is established. 1. Gain maxillary and mandibular arch length. 2. Eliminate the need for traditional high-force rapid palatal expansion. 3. Improve the bone, tissue, and vascular support around the labially blocked cuspids. 4. Eliminate the dark corners of the smile. 5. Minimize concave facial profile and obtuse nasolabial angle. Treatment Sequence: Special torques in appliance construction. Lower right cuspid +7 (high torque) was selected to upright the lingually tipped lower right cuspid. Start: 1. Bonded maxillary and mandibular 7 to 7, excluding the upper right cuspid and lower left cuspid. 2. Placed maxillary and mandibular.014 NiTi SE (see Initial archwire) and activated medium-light NiTi SE spring in the lower left cuspid area (see NiTi springs). 3. No spring was placed in the upper right cuspid area due to the deflection of the archwire resulting from the rotated lateral. 47

Appt. 1 2 months: Rebonded lower right cuspid. Continued to let.014 NiTi SE archwire work in mandibular arch. Placed maxillary.016 NiTi SE with medium-light NiTi spring in upper right cuspid area (see NiTi springs). Appt. 2 3 months 1 week: Bonded upper right cuspid and lower left cuspid. Rebonded upper right lateral after most of the rotation corrected. Placed upper and lower.014 NiTi SE archwires. Note: Decrease in size of maxillary archwire to accommodate maxillary right cuspid. Appt. 3 6 months 1 week: Placed maxillary.014 x.025 NiTi SE and mandibular.016 NiTi SE archwires. Appt. 4 8 months 3 weeks: Placed maxillary.016 x.025 NiTi SE. Repositioned lower right second bicuspid bracket. Continued with mandibular.016 NiTi SE archwire. Appt. 5 11 months: Took Panorex to check root position and brackets. Placed maxillary.019 x.025 preposted stainless steel (see Final Archwire). Placed mandibular.014 x.025 NiTi SE. Note: Almost one full year of treatment before initiating any rectangular wire on mandibular arch. Appt. 6 13 months: Placed mandibular.017 x.025 TMA with crimpable hooks. Placed tiebacks on maxillary and mandibular archwire (see Tiebacks). Started light Class III elastics with anterior trapezoid (see Class III elastics). Note: TMA wire used for ease of closing open bite with anterior trapazoid elastics. 48

Appt. 7 15 months 2 weeks: Adjusted maxillary and mandibular archwires. Continued Class III elastics with anterior trapezoid. Class III Elastics with Anterior Trapezoid Appt. 8 17 months 2 weeks: Finishing Elastics Adjusted upper and lower archwires. Placed finishing elastics. Note: Anterior open bite closed. Now closing posterior open bite with finishing elastics. 49

Finals 18 months 2 weeks: Debonded upper and lower. Posttreatment Posttreatment Note increased facial profile support. Final Final Final Initial Posttreatment Posttreatment Final 50

Initial Final Composite Occlusal Cast Transverse Measurement Comparisons Posttreatment Posttreatment 32.0 mm 33.0 mm 1 mm change 25.0 mm 26.0 mm 1 mm change 35.0 mm 41.0 mm 6 mm change 28.0 mm 33.0 mm 5 mm change 46.0 mm 50.0 mm 4 mm change 39.0 mm 42.5 mm 3.5 mm change 51

Retention: 1. Debanded upper and lower. 2. Bonded upper and lower retainer wires placed cuspid to cuspid due to severity of crowding and tongue habit. 3. Clear-plastic overlay retainers made for upper and lower arches. 4. Impression taken for Damon Splint absolutely critical to make splint for nighttime wear helps contain the tongue and maintain orientation of the upper and lower arches. S.H. Case Summary Maxillary.014 NiTi SE.016 NiTi SE.014 NiTi SE.014 x.025 NiTi SE.016 x.025 NiTi SE.019 x.025 SS Preposted NiTi spaceclosing coil springs Mandibular Class III Elastics with Anterior Trapezoid Finishing Elastics.014 NiTi SE.016 NiTi SE.014 x.025 NiTi SE.017 x.025 TMA with crimpable hooks NiTi space-closing coil springs Weeks 52

S.H. Initial 10 Months Retention Note the incredible bone and tissue contours around the upper right and lower left cuspids that were initially blocked out of the arch. 53