*Carbohydrate & Lipid Metabolism Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Similar documents
Common Repatha Documentation Requirements for Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia and Established CVD 1,2

PCSK9 inhibition in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

Randomized Comparison of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Long-term Administration of AMG 145: 52-Week Results From the OSLER Study

PCSK9 for LDL Cholesterol Reduction: What have we learned from clinical trials?

Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab (Repatha ) for primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia.

PCSK9 antibodies: A new therapeutic option for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia

PCSK9 inhibition across a wide spectrum of patients: One size fits all?

UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs

Familial hypercholesterolaemia

HoFH presents with a wide spectrum of LDL-C levels in a genetically confirmed cohort of patients

Cholesterol; what are the future lipid targets?

The Addition of Ezetimibe to Statin therapy in. Patients with Homozygous Familial. Hypercholesterolaemia

Inhibition of PCSK9: The Birth of a New Therapy

Familial Hypercholeterolaemia

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

March 30, 2014, Joint ACC/JAMA Late-breaking Clinical Trials Session 402 American College of Cardiology, Washington DC

DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF FH CHILDREN. O. GUARDAMAGNA Dipartimento di Scienze della Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche UNIVERSITA DI TORINO

Goal Achievement after Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin-Intolerant Subjects (GAUSS): Results from a

Drug Therapy Guidelines

UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 150 mg Q2W Dose of the PCSK9 mab REGN727/SAR236553: Data from Three Phase 2 Studies

Hypercholesterolaemia is there a place for PCSK9-inhibitor therapy?

REPATHA (PCSK9 INHIBITORS)

PCSK9 inhibition in familial hypercholesterolemia: A revolution in treatment

Drug Class Monograph

From Biology to Therapy The biology of PCSK9 in humans Just LDL-cholesterol or more? May 24th. Dr. Gilles Lambert

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9(PCSK9) Inhibitors Prior Authorization with Quantity Limit Program Summary

Repatha (evolocumab) Policy Number: Last Review: 06/2018 Origination: 07/2015 Next Review: 06/2019

Evan A. Stein 1, David Sullivan 2, Anders G. Olsson 3, Rob Scott 4, Jae B. Kim 4, Allen Xue 4, Thomas Liu 4, Scott M. Wasserman 4

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

What Role do the New PCSK9 Inhibitors Have in Lipid Lowering Treatment?

Lipids: new drugs, new trials, new guidelines

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

PCSK9 Inhibitors: A View of Clinical Studies

PCSK9 Inhibitors Current Status

Very high cholesterol from birth: are target LDL cholesterol levels now achievable with new treatments?

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Drug Prior Authorization Guideline PCSK9 Inhibitors -

Lipid Metabolism in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Repatha. Repatha (evolocumab) Description

PCSK9 Agents Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Subject: Repatha (evolocumab) Original Effective Date: 09/28/2015. Policy Number: MCP-258 Revision Date(s): 5/4/16; 4/17/17

Repatha. Repatha (evolocumab) Description

Request for Prior Authorization for PCSK9 inhibitor therapy Website Form Submit request via: Fax

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients: ODYSSEY LONG TERM

Drug Class Prior Authorization Criteria PCSK9 Inhibitors

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

PCSK9 Inhibitors Current Status

Systematic review of published Phase 3 data on anti-pcsk9 monoclonal antibodies in patients with hypercholesterolaemia

EVOLOCUMAB Generic Brand HICL GCN Exception/Other EVOLOCUMAB REPATHA 42378

Juxtapid (lomitapide)

Evolocumab for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia

New Horizons in Dyslipidemia Management in Primary Care

Juxtapid and Kynamro

Beyond HDL: new therapeutic targets

Pharmacy Management Drug Policy

WORKSHOP 1. Management of Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Cigna Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy

Paradim Shift in cholesterol behandeling: van LDL-C target naar LDL-C eradicatie

Effect of alirocumab on the frequency of lipoprotein apheresis: A randomised Phase III trial

Accumulating Clinical data on PCSK9 Inhibition: Key Lessons and Challenges

Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab (Repatha ) for hypercholesterolemia

Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: phenotype rules! Commentary on the study of Raal et al.

Alirocumab for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Familial Hypercholesterolemia New treatments

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

Nephrologisches Zentrum Göttingen GbR Priv. Doz. Dr. med. V. Schettler

Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

Anne Carol Goldberg, MD, FACP, FAHA, FNLA Washington University, St. Louis, MO USA

PCSK9 Inhibitors Are They Worth The Money? Michael J. Blaha MD MPH

Supplementary appendix

THE ESC/EAS LIPID GUIDELINES IN THE ELDERLY

ALN-PCSsc, an RNAi Investigational Agent That Inhibits PCSK9 Synthesis With the Potential for Effective Bi-Annual Dosing: Interim Results

Kynamro (mipomersen)

Familial Hypercholesterolemia What a cardiologist should know

PCSK9 Inhibitors: Promise or Pitfall?

Genetic and biochemical characteristics of patients with hyperlipidemia who require LDL apheresis

Clinical Policy: Evolocumab (Repatha) Reference Number: ERX.SPMN.184 Effective Date: 01/2017

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

Evolving Concepts on Lipid Management from Ezetimibe (IMPROVE IT) to PCSK9 Inhibitors

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

Clinical Policy: Evolocumab (Repatha) Reference Number: CP.CPA.269 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: Commercial

QUANTITY LIMIT TARGET DRUGS- RECOMMENDED LIMITS Brand (generic) GPI Multisource Code Quantity Limit

LIPOPROTIEN APHERESIS. Bruce Sachais, MD, PhD Executive Medical Director New York Blood Center

1. Has this plan authorized this medication in the past for this patient (i.e., previous authorization is on file under this plan)?

Repatha. Repatha (evolocumab) Description

Case Discussions: Treatment Strategies for High Risk Populations. Most Common Reasons for Referral to the Baylor Lipid Clinic

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Challenges in lipid management

Repatha. Repatha (evolocumab) Description

Early Clinical Development #1 REGN727: anti-pcsk9

Focus on FH (Familial Hypercholesterolemia) Joshua W. Knowles, MD PhD for PCNA May, 2013

PCSK9 Inhibitors DRUG POLICY BENEFIT APPLICATION

Patient Lists. Epic ABOUT THIS GUIDE INDICATIONS AND USAGE IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION. Please see accompanying full Prescribing Information

Pharmacy Policy Bulletin

Familial hypercholesterolaemia in children and adolescents

Transcription:

Tuesday, May 26, 2015 Clinical Breakthroughs: Modifying LDL Cholesterol to Prevent CV Events International Society of Atherosclerosis, Amsterdam, Netherlands Long-term Treatment With Evolocumab in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH): Interim Results from the Trial Assessing Long-Term Use of PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Genetic LDL Disorders (TAUSSIG) Study Frederick J. Raal *, G. Kees Hovingh, Dirk Blom, Raul D. Santos, Mariko Harada-Shiba, Eric Bruckert, Patrick Couture, Narimon Honarpour, Christopher Kurtz, Yan Zheng, Scott M. Wasserman, Evan A Stein *Carbohydrate & Lipid Metabolism Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Frederick J. Raal FCP(SA), FRCP, FRCPC, Cert Endo, MMed(Wits), PhD Professor Raal has received research grants, honoraria, or consulting fees for professional input and/or delivered lectures from AstraZeneca, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Sanofi, Regeneron, Amgen, and Genzyme/Isis Pharmaceuticals. 2

Background Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare and serious genetic disorder characterised by: Markedly elevated LDL-C Cutaneous and tendon xanthomatas in childhood Premature and often fatal cardiovascular disease Because of minimal LDL receptor (LDLR) function, conventional lipid-lowering medication is only modestly effective and lipoprotein apheresis, if available, is frequently required. 3

TESLA-B In the TESLA part B study, 1 at Week 12, evolocumab 420 mg monthly reduced LDL-C by 23% from baseline and by 31% compared with placebo. a a From a repeated measures model; the graph depicts observed data 1 Raal et al. Lancet 2015;385:341-50 4

Objective To assess the longer-term efficacy and safety of evolocumab in a large cohort of 100 patients with HoFH 5

Methods Patients: Key study inclusion criteria De novo or rollover patients with HoFH from TESLA-A and -B Age 12 years Stable low-fat diet and lipid-lowering therapy for 4 weeks Apheresis schedule every two weeks (if receiving apheresis) Data cutoff July 1 st, 2014 Treatment: Apheresis patients: evolocumab 420 mg every two weeks (Q2W) Non-apheresis patients: evolocumab 420 mg monthly (QM) Following 12 weeks of QM dosing and at the discretion of the investigator, the dosing frequency could be increased to 420 mg Q2W in nonapheresis patients. In the patients receiving apheresis, lipids were measured just prior to apheresis. For parent study rollover patients from TESLA-A and -B, baseline was defined as parent study baseline. 6

End of Study (5 years or commercial availability) TAUSSIG: HoFH Substudy A multicenter, single-arm, open-label, active treatment-only study evaluating the long-term efficacy and safety of evolocumab in patients with HoFH not controlled by current lipid therapy Screening Period Fasting LDL-C 5 10 days before Day 1 a Apheresis 420 mg Q2W for 12 weeks Non-apheresis 420 mg QM for 12 weeks All patients 420 mg Q2W OR 420 mg QM (investigator discretion) for 12 weeks All patients 420 mg Q2W OR 420 mg QM (investigator discretion) Max. 6 weeks Day 1 Week 12 (titration option) Week 24 (titration option) Visits every 12 weeks EOS a For parent study rollover patients from TESLA-A and -B, there was no screening period required before Day 1. 7

Baseline Patient Characteristics Age (years), mean (SD) Patients < 18 years of age (%) HoFH Patients (N = 100) 34 (14) (14) Female, % 49 Race, % White Asian American Indian or Alaska Native Other Apheresis, % 34 Coronary artery disease, % 46 Coronary artery bypass surgery, % 27 Cerebrovascular or peripheral arterial disease, % 16 81 13 1 5 8

Patient Genetic Characteristics Genetic Status, % Double LDLR mutation (homozygous or compound heterozygous) Double LDLR mutation + ApoB heterozygous ApoB homozygous ApoB homozygous + LDLR heterozygous LDLR heterozygous (homozygous phenotype) Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia PCSK9 gain-of-function and LDLR double heterozygous Genotypes, % LDLR PCSK9 gain-of-function ApoB Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolaemia HoFH Patients (N = 100) Mutations in both LDLR alleles, % 89 88 1 1 1 1 4 4 95 4 3 4 9

Baseline LDL-C, ApoB, Lp(a), and PCSK9 LDL-C a (mmol/l) mean (SD) ApoB (g/l) mean (SD) Lp(a) (nmol/l) median (Q1, Q3) PCSK9 (nmol/l) b mean (SD) HoFH Patients (N = 100) 8.3 (3.3) 2.0 (0.7) 74.0 (24.3, 154.3) 9.3 (2.8) a LDL-C was measured using ultracentrifugation. b Mean PCSK9 levels in HeFH patients, 6.0 6.4 nmol/l; 2 in hypercholesterolaemia patients, 4.5 5.5 nmol/l 3 2 Raal et al. Lancet 2015;385:331-40. 3 Robinson et al. JAMA 2014;311:1870-82. 10

Results: Percent Change from Baseline to Open-label Extension Weeks 12, 24, and 48 in LDL-C, ApoB, Lp(a), and PCSK9 in HoFH Patients With and Without Apheresis a Mean (SE) b Week 12 (N = 94) Week 24 (N = 67) Week 48 (N = 30) LDL-C c -20.9 (2.5) -23.4 (3.5) -18.6 (3.8) ApoB -14.8 (2.3) -18.5 (2.8) -17.1 (3.1) Lp(a) -7.6 (-21.3, 6.5) -14.7 (-29.4, -0.5) -14.1 (-40.6, -1.3) PCSK9-50.4 (4.0) -67.1 (5.6) -76.5 (5.9) a All apheresis patients began the study on apheresis Q2W and evolocumab 420 mg Q2W to match their apheresis schedule. All non-apheresis patients began the study on evolocumab 420 mg QM; at Week 12, non-apheresis patients could uptitrate to Q2W dosing at investigator discretion. b Lp(a) is presented as median (Q1, Q3). c LDL-C was measured using ultracentrifugation. 11

Percent change from baseline in UC LDL-C Individual Percent Change from Baseline to Week 12 in UC LDL-C (N = 94) 60% 40% 20% Defective LDLR Negative LDLR Unclassified LDLR PCSK9 gain-of-function/ldlr ARH Other 0% -20% * -40% -60% -80% -100% * Patient stopped ezetimibe and reduced rosuvastatin from 20 mg to 5 mg daily at Week 4. Because of the change in background therapy, reduction in UC LDL-C was 90% at Week 4, but only 20% at Week 12. 12 Abbreviations: ARH, autosomal recessive hypercholesterolaemia

Percent Change from Baseline in UC LDL-C a a All apheresis patients began the study on apheresis Q2W and evolocumab 420 mg Q2W to match their apheresis schedule. All non-apheresis patients began the study on evolocumab 420 mg QM; at Week 12, non-apheresis patients could uptitrate to Q2W dosing at investigator discretion. b For parent study rollover patients, baseline was defined as parent study baseline. 13

Percent Change from Baseline to Open-label Extension Week 12 in Lipids and PCSK9 by Apheresis Status a Baseline, mean (SD) Change from baseline at Week 12 (%), mean (SE) Non-apheresis (n = 66) Apheresis (n = 34) Non-apheresis (n = 63) Apheresis (n = 31) LDL-C b 8.7 (3.6) mmol/l 7.4 (2.6) mmol/l -23.1 (2.8) -16.5 (4.9) ApoB 2.1 (0.7) g/l 1.8 (0.5) g/l -16.1 (2.7) -12.1 (4.3) Lp(a) c 77.5 (23.0, 146.0) 65.5 (28.0, 173.5) -7.5 (-17.6, 7.4) -10.0 (-23.1, 5.0) nmol/l nmol/l PCSK9 9.0 (2.6) nmol/l 9.9 (3.1) nmol/l -31.7 (3.9) -90.2 (2.9) a All apheresis patients began the study on apheresis Q2W and evolocumab 420 mg Q2W to match their apheresis schedule. All non-apheresis patients began the study on evolocumab 420 mg QM; at Week 12, non-apheresis patients could uptitrate to Q2W dosing at investigator discretion. b LDL-C was measured using ultracentrifugation. c Lp(a) is presented as median (Q1, Q3). 14

Percent Change in UC-LDL-C, mean (SE) Further Reduction in LDL-C in Non-apheresis Patients After Uptitrating Evolocumab from QM to Q2W (n = 28 a ) 0 After 12 weeks of evolocumab 420 mg QM After 12 weeks of evolocumab 420 mg Q2W -5-10 -15-20 -25-16.2% (-1.5 mmol/l) 6% additional decrease (0.6 mmol/l) -30 P < 0.05-22.4% (-2.1 mmol/l) Data in parentheses are the absolute reduction in LDL-C. a All 28 patients had 12 weeks each of evolocumab 420 mg QM and evolocumab 420 mg Q2W. 15

Safety and Tolerability Adverse Events (AEs) Patient Incidence (%) Any AE 68 Serious AEs 10 Deaths 0 AEs leading to discontinuation of evolocumab a 1 Most-common AEs b Nasopharyngitis Influenza Anaemia c Headache a For rash; subsequent to this data cut, the patient was rechallenged with evolocumab. b 5% of patients c All non-serious, CTCAE grade 1 (n = 4) or 2 (n = 1). Evolocumab was continued in all 5 patients. Three patients were receiving apheresis (females aged 21 37 years); 1 had pre-existing anaemia. None of these events were deemed related to evolocumab. 9 7 5 5 16

Serious AEs All serious AEs were consistent with the natural history of HoFH. There were 11 events in 10 patients: Complications of FH (9) Aortic valve disease (2) Aortic stenosis Aortic valve disease Atherosclerosis (6) Chest pain Angina pectoris Coronary artery disease Coronary artery occlusion Myocardial ischaemia Carotid artery occlusion Apheresis-related (1) Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis Other (2) Non-cardiac chest pain (known history prior to study) Haematuria (while receiving heparin as part of lipid apheresis) 17

Conclusions Evolocumab 420 mg QM or Q2W reduced LDL-C in patients with HoFH on lipid-lowering therapy with or without apheresis by approximately 20% from baseline to Week 12. The reduction in LDL-C persisted up to Week 48. Increasing evolocumab 420 mg from QM to Q2W dosing resulted in an incremental 6% (0.6 mmol/l) reduction in LDL-C in non-apheresis patients. Evolocumab was well-tolerated; serious adverse events reflect the natural history of HoFH. 18