Innovations in screening for cervical cancer: The Australian Example

Similar documents
The future of breast cancer screening in Australia: Insights from the transformation of the National Cervical Screening Program

HPV vaccination Effects on cervical screening and the Compass Trial

The Compass trial: Informing changes to the National Cervical Screening Program

The Introduction of Primary HPV Screening in Australia

The new Cervical Screening Test for Australian women: Louise Farrell

o 2-yearly (Pap test) o 18 to 69 years 1 o Registry reminder

Cervical screening and the Nurse: current and future directions. Dr Lara Roeske

Appendix This appendix was part of the submitted manuscript and has been peer reviewed. It is posted as supplied by the authors.

The Future of Cervical Screening. Jenny Ross

Impact for Indigenous Women: The VIP-I study and the National HPV Vaccine Program

The Renewed National Cervical Screening Program

HPV TESTING AND THE RENEWAL PROGRAMME. Deborah Neesham Gynaecological Oncologist RWH

Cost and cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening Harry J. de Koning, MD PhD

The National Cervical Screening Program: On the Cusp of Change

BUILDING TRUST, MANAGING RISK: VACCINE CONFIDENCE AND HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINATION

Human papillomavirus and vaccination for cervical cancer

Preventing cervical cancer Australia. The Renewed National Cervical Screening Program 2019 Common Questions and Cases

Screening for the Precursors of Cervical Cancer in the Era of HPV Vaccination. Dr Stella Heley Senior Liaison Physician Victorian Cytology Service

Natural History of HPV Infections 15/06/2015. Squamous cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma

UICC HPV and CERVICAL CANCER CURRICULUM. UICC HPV and Cervical Cancer Curriculum Chapter 5. Application of HPV vaccines Prof. Suzanne Garland MD

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and cervical cancer prevention. Menzies School of Health

Women s and Children s Health Network

The new European (and Italian) guidelines for cervical screening will recommend PAP from 25 to 34 HPV (+ triage) from 35 to 64

The Control of Cervical Cancer in New Zealand: Achievements and Prospects

Cervical Cancer Screening. David Quinlan December 2013

Kate T Simms, Jean-François Laprise, Megan A Smith, Jie-Bin Lew, Michael Caruana, Marc Brisson, Karen Canfell

Recent Changes in Cervical Cancer Screening in Canada

XXV. HPV disease: Prevention and. management in the 21st century. SCIENTIFIC MEETING SYDNEY 2017

The Renewed National Cervical Screening Program:

Proposed new national cervical screening program. Dr Elizabeth Jackson Obstetrician Gynaecologist Cairns

Focus. A case. I have no conflicts of interest. HPV Vaccination: Science and Practice. Collaborative effort with Karen Smith-McCune, MD, PhD 2/19/2010

Human papillomavirus: Beware the infection you can t see

HPV Genotyping: A New Dimension in Cervical Cancer Screening Tests

The devil is in the details

National Immunisation Conference 25th May 2018

NATIONAL CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME Monitor 2017

HPV Primary Screening Update. Prof. Vu Ba Quyet Director of NO&G hospital

National Cervical Screening Programme. Annual Report 2014

An evaluation of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing within the UK cervical cancer screening programme Sherlaw-Johnson C, Philips Z

Goals. In the News. Primary HPV Screening 3/9/2015. Your PAP and HPV Update Primary HPV Testing- Screening Intervals- HPV Vaccine Updates-

Early effect of the HPV vaccination programme on cervical abnormalities in Victoria, Australia: an ecological study

Update on HPV Testing. Robert Schlaberg, M.D., Dr. med., M.P.H. Assistant Professor, University of Utah Medical Director, ARUP Laboratories

National Cervical Screening Program MBS Item Descriptors

Closing the Data Gap. Louise Galloway Senior Advisor, Population Health Policy and Programs. Department of Health & Human Services

Declining endocervical rates: does it matter? Dorota Gertig Medical Director, VCCR

The First 5 years of HPV Vaccination in Australia - A National Evaluation

Preventing Cervical Cancer 2018 WHAT THIS WILL MEAN FOR PRIMARY CARE

Promoting Cervical Screening Information for Health Professionals. Cervical Cancer

Randomiserade vårdrpogram vid implementering av nya screeningstrategier

COLPOSCOPY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (C QuIP) VICTORIAN CERVICAL CYTOLOGY REGISTRY PILOT STUDY. Dorota Gertig, Marion Saville

Primary High Risk HPV Testing with Cytology Triage

Focus on Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in the immunocompromised host and in non cervical cancers

Evidence-based treatment of a positive HPV DNA test. Th. Agorastos Prof. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Aristotle University Thessaloniki/GR

Planning an effective HPV vaccination launch: The key indicators for success Joakim Dillner

HPV vaccination How to promote women s health and prevent cancer with good screening strategies, hosted by NFOG

Fall in Human Papillomavirus Prevalence Following a National Vaccination Program

Cancer screening: Breast

An update on the Human Papillomavirus Vaccines. I have no financial conflicts of interest. Case 1. Objectives 10/26/2016

Appropriate Use of Cytology and HPV Testing in the New Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines

Screening for Cervical Cancer. Grand Rounds 1/16/13 Meggan Linck

/SH14236_AC CSIRO 2015 Sexual Health 2015, 12(4),

An Update from The Study of the Prevention of Anal Cancer

NATIONAL CERVICAL SCREENING PROGRAMME

Cervical cancer prevention: Advances in primary screening and triage system

Guidelines for HPV vaccine

The effects of immunisation on infection and Disease

Molecular Triage: Partial and Extended Genotyping and More!

ASCCP 2013 Guidelines for Managing Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests

OPPORTUNISTIC HPV VACCINATION: AN EXPANDED VISION

TARGETS To reduce the age-standardised mortality rate from cervical cancer in all New Zealand women to 3.5 per or less by the year 2005.

QA and Quality Indicators for Cervical Cancer Screening Programs. Guglielmo Ronco MD Senior Epidemiologist CPO Piemonte Turin, Italy

CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING SCENARIOS for pan-canadian Cervical Screening Initiative

The data from the ATHENA study and others bring this expectation and the appropriateness of the guidelines for women aged into question.

INFORMATION FOR RESEARCHERS REQUESTING DATA FROM THE NHVPR

SESSION J4. What's Next? Managing Abnormal PAPs in 2014

Update on Cervical Cancer Screening. Rahmouna Farez M.D. Assistant Professor, Medical College of Wisconsin 5/2/2014

Update on Cervical Cancer Screening

Opinion: Cervical cancer a vaccine preventable disease

Cervical Cancer Screening

EFCS Symposium. Is cervical cancer screening based on HPV testing with cytology triage as safe as perceived?

Northern Ireland Cervical Screening Programme

Changes to cervical screening. Information for patients

European Union survey on organization and quality control of cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination programs

The Impact of HPV Vaccination and the Future of Cervical Cancer Screening

improving access to cervical screening for under-screened women

IMPACT OF HPV IMMUNIZATION STRATEGIES & POTENTIAL FOR CERVICAL CANCER ELIMINATION

Recommandations SSGO dépistage cancer du col utérin. Pr Patrick Petignat University Hospitals of Geneva

News. Laboratory NEW GUIDELINES DEMONSTRATE GREATER ROLE FOR HPV TESTING IN CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING TIMOTHY UPHOFF, PHD, DABMG, MLS (ASCP) CM

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and Cervical Cancer Prevention

Information on: HPV testing. jostrust.org.uk

Guidelines for cervical cancer screening in South Africa

The HPV Immunisation Programme in NZ. Chris Millar Senior Advisor Immunisation Ministry of Health

Perfecting the Prevention of Cervical cancer. I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today. Preview

1/12/2016. I do not engage in any lucrative deals that require disclosure.

Cervical screening. Cytology-based screening programmes

Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Baseline HPV 2009: A route to evaluation of the HPV vaccination programme

These comments are an attempt to summarise the discussions at the manuscript meeting. They are not an exact transcript.

Transcription:

Innovations in screening for cervical cancer: The Australian Example Karen Canfell 1. Director, Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW. 3. Adjunct Professor, School of Public Health, University of Sydney. 2. Conjoint Professor, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW. World Cancer Conference, Paris 2016 Disclosures: I am co-pi of an investigator-initiated trial of primary HPV screening in Australia ( Compass ) conducted by the Victorian Cytology Service, which has received a funding contribution from Roche Molecular Systems and Ventana Inc., USA. My modelling work is funded via grants from NHMRC Australia, National Cancer Institute USA, government contracts in a number of countries, and funding from a number of other non-commercial agencies including Cancer Council NSW,. I receive salary support (Career Development Fellowship) from NHMRC.

Impact of cervical screening in Australia In 1991 Australia introduced an organised program of 2- yearly Pap smears in women aged 18-69 years. Between 1988 1990 and 2008 2010, falls in cervical cancer incidence of: 45% in women 25 49 54% in women 50 69 50% in women 70+ years No change in women aged 20 24 years Rates plateaued in all age groups in the early-mid 2000 s Squamous cell cancer Squamous cell cancer Adenocarcinoma Squamous cell cancer Smith M and Canfell K, MJA 2016 Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Smith M and Canfell K, MJA 2016

National HPV Vaccination Program Australia was the first country in the world to roll out a publicly-funded National HPV Vaccination Program in 2007 Routine vaccination of 12-13 year females from 2007 2-year school and GP-based catch-up in 12-26 years Used quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV 16,18,6,11) By 2016, all women aged 35 have been offered vaccination Coverage data from National HPV Vaccination Register Sept 2011

Predicted drop in HPV 16 prevalence after HPV vaccination implementation in Australia Adapted from: Smith et al. Int J Cancer 2008

Observed impact in Australia Females, early twenties Warts 73% Smith M et al JID 2014 Vaccine-included HPV types 77% Tabrizi S/Brotherton J et al JID 2012 Confirmed CIN2/3 34% Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2016, 2013-2014.

Further impact of male vaccination From 2013, males aged 12-13 vaccinated at school 2-year catch-up to Year 9. Via herd immunity, will also provide additional benefits to females Male coverage by dose, 2014 Predicted reduction in HPV incidence in females in Australia, with female-only vaccination (Strategy 1) vs. both-sex vaccination (Strategy 3) http://www.hpvregister.org.au/research/coverage-data Smith M et al, International Journal of Cancer 2008

The screening policy question A woman s lifetime risk of cervical cancer now depends on vaccination If vaccinated, what type of vaccine? Vaccinated after HPV exposure? How many doses? Unvaccinated but benefiting from herd immunity?.how should this be factored into cervical screening decisions?

Renewal of the National Cervical Screening Program Announced November 2011 Aim: To ensure that all Australian women, HPV vaccinated and unvaccinated, have access to a cervical screening program that is acceptable, effective, efficient and based on current evidence. The government's Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) commissioned a systematic review of the international evidence & modelled evaluation of health outcomes and costs i.e. a linked evidence approach to guide decisionmaking Process guided by an expert reference group, the Renewal Steering Committee Evidence report released April 28 th 2014 http://www.cancerscreening.gov.au

Evidence base for HPV-based screening: Screen-negative women CIN2+ CIN3+ Invasive cancer Cumulative risks over 5 years in the US Kaiser Permanante cohort according to HPV/cytology status at baseline. Data on >1M women aged 30-64 years. Gage et al JNCI 2014

Evidence base for HPV-based screening: Protection against invasive cervical cancer Cytology HPV Cytology HPV Pooled data on invasive cervical cancer outcomes from four European trials: 176,000 women Ronco et al, Lancet 2014

Evidence base for HPV-based screening: Screen-positive women HPV 16 +ve at baseline Higher risk Else HPV 18 +ve Cumulative CIN3+ in 20,514 women (median age 34 years) Intermediate risk Else HPV other +ve Oncogenic HPV -ve Low risk Khan MJ, Castle PE, et al. JNCI 2005

Final recommendation for the renewed program in Australia Negative HPV screening Other oncogenic HPV Reflex liquid-based cytology for colposcopy management HPV16/18 Routine screening in 5 years Cytology negative or low grade Cytology high grade Colposcopy (diagnostic referral) 12 month HPV FU Refer to colposcopy if any HPV +ve Otherwise return to routine screening Use the same strategy, whether or not a woman has been offered vaccination against HPV 16,18

Predicted improvements in cervical cancer rates Final modelled estimates of long term impact, taking account of clinical guidelines Cervical cancer cases Cervical cancer deaths Current cytology-based program If HPV vaccination had not been introduced 850 353 227 94 For cohorts offered vaccination as 12 year olds Renewed HPV-based program If HPV vaccination had not been introduced 584 (-265; -31%) 145 (-82; -36%) For cohorts offered vaccination as 12 year olds 267 (-85; -24%) 66 (-28; -29%) Predicted annual numbers of cervical cancer cases and deaths for the pre-renewal NCSP and the renewed NCSP (showing differences in case numbers and relative percentage differences) *Using the female Australian population as predicted for 2017. Simms et al., PloSONE (in press)

HPV self-collection for underscreened women HPV testing on self-collected cervico-vaginal samples ( selfcollection ) will be funded for unscreened and underscreened women. Must be facilitated by a clinician who also offers mainstream cervical screening, and is restricted to women aged 30 74 years who have never been screened or are overdue for cervical screening by 2 years or more. -> A single self-collected test at age 30 will reduce a woman s lifetime risk of cervical cancer by 40% -> But regularly screening in the renewed program will reduce lifetime risk by >90% Smith M, Simms K, Canfell K, MJA 2016

SCREENING APPROACHES FOR VACCINATED POPULATION: COMPASS TRIAL Karen Canfell, 1 Michael Caruana, 1 Jessica Darlington-Brown, 1 Philip Castle, 1 Dorota Gertig, 2 Julia Brotherton, 2 Stella Heley, 2 David Wrede, 3 Jeffery Tan 3 and Marion Saville 2 1 Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia 2 Victorian Cytology Service Inc., Melbourne, Australia 3 The Royal Women s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Compass is a large scale RCT of 5-yearly HPV vs. 2.5 yearly liquid-based cytology (LBC) screening in women aged 25-69 years in Victoria, Australia It is designed to provide evidence on: Test positivity and colposcopy referral rates in the first and subsequent rounds of screening Baseline CIN2+ detection in the first screening round Long term protection against CIN3+ (primary endpoint) Relative effectiveness of alternate triaging strategies for HPV positive women

Two phases: Main Trial Recruitment Status Phase I (pilot) of 5,000 women, recruitment from Oct 2013 - Nov 2014. Baseline screening round completed, including 6 month follow-up for histology outcomes Phase 2 (main trial) of 121,000 women: Recruitment commenced Jan 2015 Stratified by cohort age-eligibility for vaccination 450 clinics recruiting across Victoria Recruitment rate 85%

Pilot results: HPV prevalence Australia, pre-vaccination (2005-8) 1 HPV 16/18 HPV OHR 20% 20% 15% 15% Prevalence (% HPV positive) 10% Prevalence (% HPV positive) 10% 5% 5% 0% 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 0% 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 Age group (years) Age group (years) WHINURS HPV16/18 WHINURS OHRHPV 1 Reanalysis of data from Garland et al. BMC Medicine 2011 [Testing with LA] Note: Data adjusted for women with both HPV16and/or18 and OHR infections

Pilot results: HPV prevalence WHINURS (2005-8) vs. Compass (2014) HPV 16/18 HPV OHR 25% 25% 20% 20% Prevalence (% HPV positive) 15% 10% 82% lower Prevalence (% HPV positive) 15% 10% 5% 5% 0% 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 Age group (years) 0% 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 Age group (years) COMPASS HPV16/18 WHINURS HPV16/18 COMPASS OHRHPV WHINURS OHRHPV 1 Reanalysis of data from Garland et al. BMC Medicine 2011 [Testing with LA] Note: Data adjusted for women with both HPV16and/or18 and OHR infections

Summary: The transformation of the National Cervical Screening Program Pap smears 2-yearly; age 18-20 to 69 years 26 tests in a lifetime Reduced rates by 50% in women 25+ years, but rates now plateaued HPV DNA testing 5-yearly; age 25-74 years 10 tests in a lifetime Expected to reduce cervical cancer rates by a further 20% or more, in both unvaccinated and vaccinated cohorts

The renewed cervical screening program is scheduled to start on May 1 st 2017

The future impact of vaccination and HPV screening on cervical cancer in Australia Hall M et al., In Prep.

Acknowledgements and Funding National Cervical Screening Program: Guidelines for the management of screen-detected abnormalities, screening in specific populations and investigation of abnormal vaginal bleeding. Cancer Council Australia Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Party Chaired by Prof Ian Hammond. Cancer Council Australia Guidelines Project Team Cancer Council New South Wales Technical Team, including: Prof Karen Canfell, Jessica Darlington-Brown, Michaela Hall, Suzanne Hughes, Harriet Hui, Chloe Jennett, Jie Bin-Lew, Megan Smith, Dr Kate Simms, Dr Louiza Velentzis, Dr Susan Yuill. National Health and Medical Research Council. Project Grant APP1109121 Prof Karen Canfell, Prof You-Lin Qiao, Dr Philip Castle, Dr Kate Simms, Dr Ju-Fang Shi, Dr Jose Jeronimo Project Grant APP1065892 Prof Karen Canfell, Dr Michael Caruana, Dr Kate Simms, Jie-Bin Lew. Career Development Fellowship APP1082989 Prof Karen Canfell Medical Services Advisory Committee Applications 1122 and Reference 39, Human Papillomavirus DNA testing (Economic evaluation component). Jie-Bin Lew, Dr Kate Simms, Megan Smith, Dr Yoon-Jung Kang, Xiangming Xu, Dr. Michael Caruana, Robert Walker, Prof Karen Canfell Co-Principal Investigators: Prof Karen Canfell, A/Prof Marion Saville Chief Investigators: Dr Philip Castle, Dr Michael Caruana, Prof Val Gebski, Jessica Darlington-Brown, Dr Stella Heley, A/Prof Julia Brotherton, Prof Dorota Gertig, A/Prof Marion Saville The VCS have received equipment and a funding contribution for the Compass trial from Roche Molecular Systems and Ventana Inc USA.