Efficiency Methodology

Similar documents
Arkansas Health Care Payment Improvement Initiative Congestive Heart Failure Algorithm Summary

Risk adjustment in health care markets: concepts and applications. Randall P. Ellis. Boston University and DxCG, Inc.

CLINICAL PROCESS IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE (CPII) EFFICIENCY REPORT EXPLANATION January 4, 2016

THERE ARE TWO SUBMISSION CRITERIA FOR THIS MEASURE: 1) Patients who are 18 years and older with a diagnosis of CAD with LVEF < 40%

Cardiac Rehabilitation

Supplementary Online Content

Predictive Models: Current and Future. November 9, Steve Wickstrom Vice President, Research and Methods OptumInsight

UnitedHealth Premium Designation Program Case-mix Adjusted Benchmarks with Severity or Risk Adjustment

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

MHSPHP Metrics Forum. Diabetes.

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

2014 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY

Comprehensive ESRD Care (CEC) Model Proposed Quality Measures for Public Comment. Table of Contents

Care Facilitation Quality Improvement Report

2018 Cerebrovascular Reimbursement Coding Fact Sheet

TENNCARE Bundled Payment Initiative: Description of Bundle Risk Adjustment for Wave 4 Episodes

MACRA Quality Payment Program Guide. Sample page. Simplifying Medicare MIPS & APM reporting for practitioners. Power up your coding optum360coding.

The ESC Registry on Chronic Ischemic Coronary Disease

2016 Internal Medicine Preferred Specialty Measure Set

Practice-Level Executive Summary Report

Combining Risk Adjustment and HEDIS to Improve Quality of Care. Colleen Gianatasio, CPC, CPC-P, CPMA, CPC-I, CRC

ANGINA PECTORIS. angina pectoris is a symptom of myocardial ischemia in the absence of infarction

2014 ACO GPRO Audit What this means for your practice. Sheree M. Arnold ACO Clinical Transformation Specialist

Modular Program Report

Quality Care Plus 2015 Primary Care Physician Incentive Program. Now includes Medicare patients!

New PINNACLE Measures The below measures for PINNACLE will be added as new measures to the outcomes reporting starting with Version 2.0.

Estimating Medicaid Costs for Cardiovascular Disease: A Claims-based Approach

Objectives. Medicare Spending per Beneficiary: Analyzing MSPB Data to Identify Primary Drivers

NCAP NATIONAL CARDIAC AUDIT PROGR AMME NATIONAL HEART FAILURE AUDIT 2016/17 SUMMARY REPORT

Program Metrics. New Unique ID. Old Unique ID. Metric Set Metric Name Description. Old Metric Name

Technical Appendix for Outcome Measures

Key Quality of Care Measures. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Traditional, PPO and POS Members. Fourth Quarter 2003

Arkansas Health Care Payment Improvement Initiative Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Algorithm Summary

Get the Right Reimbursement for High Risk Patients

Performance Analysis:

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Ischemic Heart Disease Interventional Treatment

Partial Hospitalization Program Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report. User s Guide Sixth Edition. Prepared by

Modular Program Report

Comparison of Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Treated in Ambulatory Surgical Centers and Hospital Outpatient Departments

TENNCARE Bundled Payment Initiative: Description of Bundle Risk Adjustment for Wave 2 Episodes

Propensity Score Matching with Limited Overlap. Abstract

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Jacqueline C. Barrientos, Nicole Meyer, Xue Song, Kanti R. Rai ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2015:3301

Clinical Quality Measures Summary of Upcoming Enhancements

Ischemic Heart Disease Interventional Treatment

UnitedHealth Premium Program Case-mix Adjusted Benchmarks with Severity or Risk Adjustment

APR DRG Data Discovery

Medicare Severity-adjusted Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) Coding Adjustment

UnitedHealth Premium Program Case-mix, Severity and Risk

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome that results in the. impairment of the heart s ability to fill or to pump out blood.

Appendix Identification of Study Cohorts

Status of the CKD and ESRD treatment: Growth, Care, Disparities

Health Services Utilization and Medical Costs Among Medicare Atrial Fibrillation Patients / September 2010

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Performance and Quality Measures 1. NQF Measure Number. Coronary Artery Disease Measure Set

LCD L B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Assays

Your Partnership in Health Report: Chronic Conditions ABC Company and Kaiser Permanente

HEALTHCARE REFORM. September 2012

BPCI Advanced Episode Selection

2) Patients who are 18 years and older with a diagnosis of CAD or history of cardiac surgery who have a prior myocardial infarction

Symmetry Episode Treatment Groups

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and instant wave-free Ratio (The ifr modality)

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Cost Measure Field Test Reports Fact Sheet

Symmetry Episode Treatment Groups

The Cost Burden of Worsening Heart Failure in the Medicare Fee For Service Population: An Actuarial Analysis

The University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy

Chapter 6: Healthcare Expenditures for Persons with CKD

Risk Adjustment and Hierarchical Condition Category Coding

Table 1. Proposed Measures for Use in Establishing Quality Performance Standards that ACOs Must Meet for Shared Savings

Coronary Heart Disease. Raja Nursing Instructor RN, DCHN, Post RN. BSc.N

*NOTE: When submitting CPT code and 99239, it is recommended the measure be submitted each time the code is submitted for hospital discharge.

A Prospective Comparison of Two Commercially Available Hospital Admission Risk Scores

Heart disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized nations. It accounts for nearly 40% of all deaths in the United

A Pause in the Availability of Risk Adjusted National Benchmarks for AHRQ Indicators and an Alternative Measurement Approach

Big Data & Predictive Analytics Case Studies: Applying data science to human data Big-Data.AI Summit

AMCP Webinar Series. Exchanges and Qualified Health Plans: How your voice can shape the future of quality reporting 14 January 2014.

THE NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM

USRDS UNITED STATES RENAL DATA SYSTEM

Meaningful Use Clinical Quality Measures for Eligible Professionals

2016 General Practice/Family Practice Preferred Specialty Measure Set

2016 Physician Quality Reporting System Data Collection Form: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (for patients aged 18 and older)

Cardiovascular Disease

TN Bundled Payment Initiative: Overview of Episode Risk Adjustment

Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices (RAPID)

Care Management Technologies

2015 Reimbursement Information for Mammography, CAD and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis 1

HEART FAILURE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. American Heart Association Shawni Smith Regional Director, Quality & Systems Improvement

ABCBS PCMH Specifications. ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS and BLUE SHIELD An Independent Licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association

Chapter 4: Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with CKD

Modular Program Report

Coronary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)

MEASURING CARE QUALITY

Department: CARDIOLOGY Reporting Period: Apr 2014

NORTH CAROLINA STATE HEALTH PLAN FOR TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES

Quality Measures MIPS CV Specific

Specifications Manual Update: Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program

The BlueCompare SM Physician Designation Program

Value-Driven Population Health Strategies: Designing Models for Different Populations

Transcription:

Efficiency Methodology David C. Schutt, MD Bob Kelley Thomson Healthcare October 2007

Overview Definition Clinical Grouping Methods Implementation Considerations Reporting to Physician Organizations Example Analysis: Hypertension 2

Definition Output Inputs Episode Services 3

Clinical Grouping Clinical Condition Episode building Accounting for Comorbidities 4

Disease Staging Methodology 5

Disease Staging Framework Initially developed under contract to NCHSR with ongoing private development by Medstat/Jefferson teams Software converts a stream of claims into clinically homogeneous groups Takes over 15,000 ICD-9-CM codes to 560 disease categories Independent of setting or treatment Etiology assigned to each category Severity stratification based on robust clinical criteria Predicts a balanced set of outcome measures 6

Disease Staging Disease Staging Severity Stratification Stage 0 History of a disease Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Conditions with no complications or problems of minimal severity Problems limited to an organ system; significantly increased risk of complications Multiple site involvement; generalized systemic involvement; poor prognosis Death 7

Cardiovascular Clinical Criteria for Disease Staging CVS 10 DISEASE: Coronary Artery Disease with prior Coronary Revascularization ETIOLOGY: Degenerative, Genetic STAGE DESCRIPTION DIAGNOSTIC FINDINGS ICD-9-CM CODES 1.1 Coronary atherosclerosis Coronary atherosclerosis or asymptomatic chronic ischemic heart disease or old myocardial infarction 1.2 Chronic stable exertional angina or chronic ischemic heart disease 2.1 Progressing angina pectoris or exertional myocardial ischemia at low workload or old myocardial infarction with low ejection fraction 2.2 Prinzmetal s variant angina OR asymptomatic chronic ischemic heart disease OR old myocardial infarction OR history of myocardial infarction 30 days old AND ejection fraction 50% [echocardiogram report or nuclear ejection fraction report] Chronic stable exertional angina OR chronic ischemic heart disease Progressing angina pectoris OR exercise induced myocardial ischemia at < 6 METS [stress test report] OR history of prior myocardial infarction 30 days AND left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% [echocardiogram report or nuclear ejection fraction report] AND left ventricular ejection fraction >= 30% [echocardiogram report or nuclear ejection fraction report] Change in nature of onset of symptoms and severity of known anginal pain AND past history of angina OR angina occurring at rest AND ST-T elevations at time of pain [EKG report] OR Prinzmetal s variant angina Dx V4581, 99603, 41402-41407; (Dx 41181, 412, 41400-41405, 4292) + (Dx V4581, 99603) (Dx 4139, 4148-4149) + (Dx V4581, 99603) (Dx 4110, 41189) + (Dx V4581, 99603) Dx 4130-4131 + (Dx V4581, 99603) 8

Medical Episode Grouper (MEG) Methodology 9

Episodes of Care Health care is typically provided in a series of separate but related services All of these services must be included to produce a comprehensive economic analysis of care provided to patients Using an episode approach enables an assessment of costs of care and lends itself to the analysis of the processes as well as the outcomes of care Source: Hornbrook MC, Hurtado AV and Johnson RE, Health care episodes: definition, measurement and use, Medical Care Review 42:2 (Fall 1985) 10

Episode Construction Case Mix Adjustment - Diagnosis codes from health care claims and other administrative data are grouped into one of over 560 Disease Staging disease categories and severity stages Clean periods unique to each disease category are used to develop boundaries around the episode Mappings of National Drug Codes (NDCs) and laboratory/diagnostic procedure codes enable pharmacy/lab/diagnostic claims to be grouped to relevant episodes Lab and diagnostic imaging claims preceding an episode are examined to determine whether they should be combined with the episode 11

MEG Putting it All Together Look-back Episode 10 CAD, Progressive Angina Clean Period Lab Prescription Hospital Office Office Office Admission Visit Visit Visit DRUG TRANSACTION FILE PATID NDC SERVDATE 01 ISDN 95-01-15 01 INSUL 95-02-15 01 INSUL 95-04-15 01 AMOX 95-04-15 01 AMOX 95-11-15 01 GRHORM 95-11-15 LOOKUP TABLE NDC EPGRP ISDN 10 INSUL 359 INSUL 360 INSUL 361 AMOX 484 AMOX 86 12

Coronary Artery Disease Episodes Stage Description Episodes Mean Payments 1 Stable Angina 80,470 $2,657 2 Progressive Angina 14,599 $11,017 3 AMI 7,749 $16,811 Total 102,818 $4,911 MarketScan 2002 13

Patient-Level Complexity Adjusted Episodes 14

The Challenge Patient A Progressive Angina 2005 Costs ~ $15,323 62 year old, Male Comorbidities Congestive Heart Failure Type 1 Diabetes Vascular disease Renal failure Relative Risk Index = 29.62 Patient B Progressive Angina 2005 Costs ~ $5,576 Patients with at the same severity level within an episode can have significant cost variance. 58 year old, Female Comorbidities Hypertension, minimal Relative Risk Index = 2.54...due to different comorbidity profiles. 15

Episodes and Patient-Level Risk Adjustment MEG Disease-based episodes of care, e.g., Coronary Artery Disease and Diabetes Disease severity predicated on the progression of medical complications of a disease, e.g., Coronary Artery Disease: Stage 1: Stable angina Stage 2: Progressive Angina Stage 3: AMI Unit of analysis an episode 16

Episodes and Patient-Level Adjustment (cont d) Diagnostic Cost Groups (DCGs) Risk adjustment methodology used to predict current or future patient costs, e.g. relative risk score (RRS) Unit of analysis the patient Based on all prior or current year claims to identify patient-level complexity/comorbidities Together, MEG and DCGs provide a complete picture of a patient 17

DCG Model Clinical Output ICD-9-CM codes (n = 15,000+) DxGroups (n = 781) Condition Categories (CCs) (n= 184) Hierarchies imposed for predictions Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) (n= 31) Each ICD-9-CM code maps to one DxGroup (clinically homogeneous). Most members have multiple DxGroups. CCs are clinical groupings of DxGroups that are related and imply similar resource use (organized by body system or disease group). Each DxGroup maps to only one CC. 31 Hierarchies are imposed on the CCs to produce HCCs. These clinical hierarchies identify the most costly manifestation of each distinct disease. A member is only assigned the highest CC in each hierarchy. A member will likely have multiple HCCs. Used with permission of DxCG 18

DCG Relative Risk Score (RRS) Risk Categories Relative Risk Score Used by permission DxCG, Inc. 62 year old male.45 HCCs Diabetes with renal manifestations 5.71 Type 1 diabetes.95 Congestive heart failure 1.84 Unstable angina.92 Vascular disease with complication 1.20 Vascular disease 0 (h) Dialysis status 18.09 Diabetes with congestive heart failure.46 29.62 19

Coronary Artery Disease: Severity Stages and Complexity Levels Complexity Levels RRS Ranges Mean Allowed Payments Disease Severity Stage A B C D E Stable Angina 1 $1,080 $1,424 $1,679 $1,940 $2,246 Progressive Angina 2 $5,974 $8,704 $10,825 $13,173 $13,173 Acute Myocardial Infarction 3 $11,041 $15,041 $15,041 $18,423 $18,423 Source: Medstat Health Plan Customer, 83 million claims, 2003-2004 20

Dimensions of Risk Coronary Artery Disease $20,000 Mean Allowed Payments $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 A B C D E Complexity Levels - RRS Ranges Episode Severity Stages 1 - Stable Angina 2 - Progressive Angina 3 - AMI Source: Medstat Health Plan Customer, 83 Million Claims, 2003-2004 21

Episode 496 Asthma Dr. A Which Physician is most Efficient? Look-back Clean Period Test Office Drug Hospital Office Dr. B Look-back Clean Period Test Drug Office Office Office Office Office Drug Dr. C Clean Period Drug Drug Drug Drug Drug Drug Office Office

Implementation Issues Standardized Pricing Capitated encounters do not contain actual charges Appropriate standard costs are developed to convert utilization to dollars For example, Resource Based Relative Value Units to convert CPT codes to dollars Outlier Trims Exclude episodes with extreme high and low costs (top and bottom percentiles) Ensuring Stability and Reliability Minimum sample size per analytic unit (30 episodes but for full scale test results will report all episodes, regardless of sample size) Risk adjustment process applies statistical methods to ensure reliability Comparisons to Norms and Benchmarks Internal norms vs external norms Geographic differences to be evaluated Attribution: Enrollment information from health plans used to attribute members to POs (requires continuous one year enrollment) 23

Standardized Pricing Service Type Coding Standard Pricing Methodology Notes Facility Inpatient DRG CMS DRG Relative Weights and LOS Groups Scaled by MarketScan -based conversion factor Facility Outpatient CPT, HCPCS CMS APC and ASC weights Scaled by MarketScan -based conversion factor Professional Fee CPT CMS RBRVU weights CMS RBRVU weights, conversion factor Lab/Radiology/ Ancillary CPT CMS RBRVU weights CMS RBRVU weights, conversion factor Pharmacy NDC + Quantity Average Allowed Price MarketScan Average (NDC + Quantity) 24

Physician Organization Reporting

Reporting Results to Physician Organizations Objectives: 1. Provide meaningful information about overall performance in all efficiency measures 2. Provide enough information to make results actionable, targeting areas for improvement. Report Formats: 1. Summary document (.pdf) of PO results and relevant benchmark information for all efficiency measures: Generic prescribing Population-base efficiency Episode-based efficiency Efficiency by selected clinical area 2. Excel file of episode results, with detail at episode group level and service type. 3. Reference documentation with information on all measures and methods 26

Levels of Aggregation Methodology produces a common building block that can then be aggregated in different ways to produce different measures/measure breakdowns Building block is, for each patient episode, the risk adjusted comparison of actual to expected costs by service type: Inpatient Pharmacy Outpatient etc. See following slide for illustrative example 27

Illustrative Episode-Level Results A B C D E F Patient ID Episode Episode Disease Stage Relative Risk Complexity Start Date Score Level 12345 25-Jan-06 10 - Coronary Artery 2.1 Progressive Disease Angina 29.62 5 G H I J K L Total Observed (Standard) Inpatient Costs Total Expected (Standard) Inpatient Costs Inpatient Cost- Efficiency Total Observed (Standard) Pharmacy Costs Total Expected (Standard) Pharmacy Costs Pharmacy Cost- Efficiency $12,000 $6,300 1.90 $1,200 $2,400 0.50 M N O P Q R Total Expected Outpatient Total Observed Total Expected (Standard) Cost- Outpatient Costs Efficiency (Standard) Costs (Standard) Costs Total Observed (Standard) Outpatient Costs Overall Episode Cost- Efficiency $3,500 $4,473 0.78 $16,700 $13,173 1.27 Note: Cost Efficiency = Observed/Expected. Therefore, lower rate is better. Final calculation algorithm TBD. 28

Level of Aggregation Service Type: Example For all episodes assigned to a group for the measurement year, can: Sum total expected costs for each service type Sum total observed costs for each service type Divide observed by expected costs to get score for each service type and total Service types include: Inpatient Prescription Drug Office Visit ER Lab Radiology Outpatient Surgery Final set of service types to be informed by pilot test results 29

Summary Report P4P Efficiency Domain Summary Full Scale Test Reporting Year: 2007 Measurement Year: 2006 Physician Organization Name, DMHC # 1.4 Efficiency Score 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 1.2 Pop-Based Efficiency 1.25 Overall Episode- Based Efficiency 1.25 Inpatient Pharmacy etc. 1.33 etc. Episode 1 By Clinical Area 0.6 0.63 Episode-Based by Service Category 30

Population-Based Efficiency Summary Group Number of Members Ave Observed (Standardized) Cost/Member Ave Expected (Standardized) Cost/Member Overall Efficiency Group A 7,000 $6,000 $5,000 1.20 Percentile Number of Members Ave Observed (Standardized) Cost/Member Overall Efficiency Minimum 10 th percentile 25 th percentile 50 th percentile Mean 75 th percentile 90 th percentile Maximum Standard Deviation 31

Episode-Based Efficiency Summary Group Number of Episodes Ave Observed (Standardized) Cost/Episode Average Expected (Standardized) Cost/Episode Overall Efficiency Group A 50,000 $500 $400 1.25 Percentile Number of Episodes Ave Observed (Standardized) Cost/Episode Overall Efficiency Minimum 10 th percentile 25 th percentile 50 th percentile Mean 75 th percentile 90 th percentile Maximum Standard Deviation 32

Episode Efficiency by Service Type Group Number of Episodes Ave Observed (Standard) Inpatient Cost/Ep isode Ave Expected (Standard) Inpatient Cost/E pisode Inpatient Efficiency Ave Observ ed (Standard) Pharmacy Cost/Episode Ave Expec ted (Standard) Pharmacy Cost/Episod e Pharmacy Efficiency Ave Obser ved (Standard) Office Visit Cost/ Episo de Total Expect ed (Standard) Office Visit Cost/E pisode etc. Ave Observed (Standard) Cost/Episode Ave Expec ted (Standard) Cost/ Episo de Overall Cost- Efficien c y Group A 50,000 $150 $120 1.25 $100 $160 0.63 $140 $180 $500 $400 1.25 Percentile Inpatient Efficiency Pharmacy Efficiency.etc Overall Cost- Efficiency Avg Observed Cost per Episode Minimum 10 th percentile 25 th percentile 50 th percentile Mean 75 th percentile 90 th percentile Maximum Standard Deviation 33

Excel File of Episode Results One row for each Episode Group (560 groups) (e.g. Essential Hypertension) Data Elements: Episode name Type (e.g. Chronic) Number of Episodes Total Observed Cost Mean Observed Cost Mean Expected Cost Overall Efficiency Index Percent of Episodes Percent of Costs Mean Episode Length Observed and Expected Costs and Efficiency Score by Service Type Summary Group Roll-Ups Episode Summary Group (192 groups) Body System 34

Example Analysis of Episodic Efficiency Results: A Study of Treatment Patterns Standard reports to Physician Organizations will include service type benchmark data for a number of high impact episode groups. Considering deeper investigation into specific sources of variation in costs between high and low performing benchmark groups. Results could provide useful insights to PO improvement initiatives. 35

Study Methodology Select episode groups for investigation: High variability in provider results High volume High cost Calculate overall performance index for each provider (e.g. physician group) Sort by performance index and categorize into tiers (e.g. quintiles) Profile tiers by service category Performance index Costs Utilization Identify specific sources of variation in costs by service category 36

Hypertension: Average Total $/Episode by Provider Quintile $0 $250 $500 $750 $1,000 $1,250 $1,500 $1,750 $2,000 $2,250 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Average cost per episode is standardized for patient risk Excludes outliers and incomplete episodes 37

Hypertension: Average $/Episode by Provider Quintile $0 $250 $500 $750 $1,000 $1,250 $1,500 $1,750 $2,000 $2,250 Q1 Q2 $821 $955 OP Allowed Amount Epis Admit Allowed Amount Epis Rx Q3 $1,031 Q4 $1,192 Q5 $1,341 Prescription Drug accounts for ~70% of costs 38

Hypertension Episode Variance Analysis $200 $150 $100 $50 $79 $161 $0 ($50) ($100) ($55) ($13) ($150) ($130) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 OP Office OP Lab OP Rad ER Admit Rx As it accounts for the majority of cost, Rx accounts for most of total variance Question: Are high drug costs allowing for efficiency elsewhere? 39

Hypertension Episode Variance Analysis No Rx $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 ($5) ($10) ($15) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 OP Office OP Lab OP Rad ER Admit Similar variation is seen in cost for medical care, particularly for Quintiles 1 & 5 Differences in Quintiles 2 4 are less consistent 40

Hypertension: Provider Variance: Prescription Drug $ per Episode $1,600 $1,400 Q1 $714 Q2 $805 Q3 $870 Q4 $1,005 Q5 $1,156 $1,200 $1,000 Average: $897 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 Sample of 59 providers managing 30+ stage 1.01 hypertension patients Prescription drug payments standardized for price and patient risk 41

Average Prescription Drug $/Epis for 1 st and 5 th Quintiles $200 $190 $187 $150 $100 $111 $91 $84 $124 $93 $50 $54 $60 $35 $0 ARB ACE Inhibitor Beta Blocker Ca Channel Antiplatelet, NEC Q1 Compared to Q1, Q5 had higher $/Episode in all 5 major classes Q5 42

Average Prescription Drug $/Day for 1 st and 5 th Quintiles $4 $3 $3.62 $3.88 $2 $2.05 $2.06 $1.84 $1.91 $1 $0 $0.76 $0.82 $0.42 $0.55 ARB ACE Inhibitor Beta Blocker Ca Channel Antiplatelet, NEC Q1 Use of more costly drugs within each class contributed to Q5 s higher costs Q5 43

Average Days Supply/Episode for 1 st and 5 th Quintiles 140.0 120.0 100.0 80.0 92.2 129.3 120.2 108.9 102.3 97.6 60.0 40.0 54.3 67.5 20.0 0.0 9.6 24.0 ARB ACE Inhibitor Beta Blocker Ca Channel Antiplatelet, NEC Q1 However, higher use was a greater factor for ARB and Ca Channel drugs Q5 44

Summary Definition Clinical Grouping Methods Implementation Considerations Reporting to Physician Organizations Example Analysis: Hypertension 45