Trends in Feed and Manure Phosphorus. John Peters Soil Science Department UW-Madison

Similar documents
What s new with manure: long term trends

DAIRY FOCUS AT ILLINOIS NEWSLETTER. Focus on Forages Volume 2, Number 1

Reproductive efficiency Environment 120 Low P ( ) High P ( ) ays

FACTORS AFFECTING MANURE EXCRETION BY DAIRY COWS 1

Feed Management to Improve Nitrogen and Phosphorus Efficiency. Charles C. Stallings Professor and Extension Dairy Scientist Virginia Tech

Reducing Dietary Phosphorus in the Dairy Herd

Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay

Fiber for Dairy Cows

Nitrogen, Ammonia Emissions and the Dairy Cow

PROPOSED BEEF CATTLE MANURE EXCRETION AND CHARACTERISTICS STANDARD FOR ASAE

SHREDLAGE IN DAIRY CATTLE RATIONS. L. E. Chase Cornell University

Beef Cattle Handbook

Precision Feeding. Mike Hutjens Professor Emeritus Department of Animal Sciences University of Illinois

Matching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test

TRANSITION COW NUTRITION AND MANAGEMENT. J.E. Shirley

Proposed Beef Cattle Manure Excretion and Characteristics Standard for ASAE

Summary Report 3/2/05. Guowu Xu, Mark Whitney, and Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Exercise 6 Ration Formulation II Balance for Three or More Nutrients 20 Points

The Impact of Feeding Corn DDGS and Phytase on Manure Phosphorus Management in Pork Production

INTAKEANDDIGESTIBiliTY

Randomness Rules: Living with Variation in the Nutrient Composition of Concentrate Feeds

Protein and Carbohydrate Utilization by Lactating Dairy Cows 1

Results of UW Madison Corn Shredlage Feeding Trial

Nutritional and Feeding Strategies to Minimize Nutrient Losses in Livestock Manure

Introduction. Constraints

Understanding and Managing Variation in Nutrient Composition

Randomness Rules: Living with Variation in the Nutrient Composition of Concentrate Feeds 1

DIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

Large Herd Seminar. Tuesday 25 th June :1 5. Feeding the Dry Cow. Gordon Jones, D.V.M.

104 - ASSESSING PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM FEEDING ON OREGON DAIRIES - by Patrick French and Kathryn Higgs, Oregon State University

Feeding Strategies When Alfalfa Supplies are Short

BENCHMARKING FORAGE NUTRIENT COMPOSITION AND DIGESTIBILITY. R. D. Shaver, Ph.D., PAS

INTERACTION BETWEEN SUPPLEMENTAL PROTEIN AND ENERGY FOR LACTATING BEEF COWS GRAZING DORMANT NATIVE GRASS

Supplementation of High Corn Silage Diets for Dairy Cows. R. D. Shaver Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist

The Feeding of Supplemental Phosphorus on Dairy Farms in the Lake Champlain Basin: An Education/Demonstration Project

Supplementation for the Cow-Calf Calf Producer

Feeding and Managing for 35,000 Pounds of Production: Diet Sorting, Dry Cow Strategies and Milk Fat Synthesis

Dietary Supplements: A Necessity or Folly?

Right Quality vs High Quality Forages

Corn DDGS: A Feed Industry Perspective

Balancing Amino Acids An Example of a Reformulated Western Dairy Ration Brian Sloan, Ph.D.

Applied Beef Nutrition Ration Formulation Short Course. Beef Ration and Nutrition Decision Software

Fundamentals of Ration Balancing for Beef Cattle Part II: Nutrient Terminology

LAND & LIVESTOCK. Blaine E. Horn, Ph.D., C.P.R.M. University Senior Extension Educator Rangeland & Forage Management

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

Use of Alaska Grown Whole Seed Canola in Dairy Cattle Diets Year 2

COMPLETE LACTATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF COWS FED WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

BUILDING ON MILK PROTEIN

Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 1

Free Choice Sheep Mineral

Milk Urea Nitrogen Evaluation in Louisiana Dairy Herds

SUPPLEMENTAL DEGRADABLE PROTEIN REQUIREMENT FOR CATTLE FED STOCKPILED BERMUDAGRASS FORAGE. Authors:

Feeding High Corn Silage Diets. Ration Considerations and Economics. Darin Bremmer, Ph.D. What is a High Corn Silage Diet? 50% of Forage Dry Matter

Cost Effective Minerals

Optimum production or income over feed cost during the subsequent lactation occurs with 50- to 70-day dry periods.

Estimating Manure Nutrient Excretion

The Key to What Sells Distiller s Grains. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Cattle Nutritional Management Analysis Using Fecal Sampling, Computer Software, and Body Condition Scoring. Triangle Cross Livestock 2004

Forage Quality and Utilization: Total Tract NDF Digestibility

Mark Petersen & Jen Muscha. Livestock & Range Research Laboratory

Revision of ASAE Standard D384.1: a new approach to estimating manure nutrients and characteristics

IMPACT OF DIETARY SALT CONCENTRATION ON WATER INTAKE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS OF FEEDLOT CATTLE. Authors:

Is Your Dairy Management Program Ready for the Summer Heat?

Using Feed Analysis to Troubleshoot Nutritional Problems in Dairy Herds 1

Composition and Nutritive Value of Corn Fractions and Ethanol Co-products Resulting from a New Dry-milling Process 1

Effective Practices In Sheep Production Series

EFFECTS OF FEEDING WHOLE COTTONSEED COATED WITH STARCH, UREA, OR YEAST ON PERFORMANCE OF LACTATING DAIRY COWS

Effect of Increasing Levels of Monensin in an Energy Supplement for Cattle Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture

Understanding Dairy Nutrition Terminology

DDGS FEEDING TRIAL ON DAIRY CATTLE IN INDONESIA

MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS AND FEED ADDITIVES CAN THEY ELIMINATE FESCUE TOXICITY?

WHAT DO THE COWS HAVE TO SAY ABOUT NDF AND STARCH DIGESTION?

CUSTOM MINERAL MIXES: ARE THEY FEASIBLE?

What did we learn about shredlage? Sally Flis, Ph.D. Feed and Crop Support Specialist, Dairy One. Project Summary

we will 100 pounds; peak 2011) where In Part VI (Jan Production Year 2011) we calving the first rangeland forage and supplement determine how

Nutrition Building the Foundation

MANAGING THE DAIRY COW DURING THE DRY PERIOD

FEEDING VALUE OF WET DISTILLERS GRAINS FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS WHEN CO-ENSILED WITH CORN SILAGE OR HAYCROP SILAGE

TDN. in vitro NDFD 48h, % of NDF WEX

Using Models on Dairy Farms How Well Do They Work? Larry E. Chase, Ph. D. Cornell University

INCLUSION OF FAT IN DIETS FOR EARLY LACTATING HOLSTEIN COWS. J. E. Shirley and M. E. Scheffel

INCREASING PERFORMANCE OF GROWING CATTLE AFTER WEANING USING COTTONSEED AND COTTONSEED MEAL SUPPLEMENTS

The Benefits and Costs of Commodity Feeding

Evaluating Corn Silage Management. Dr. Jessica Williamson, Penn State Joe Lawrence, Cornell CALS PRO-DAIRY

Causes and prevention of displaced abomasum (DA) in dairy cows

Section 2 Feed Management

Corn silage quality and dairy cattle feeding

Dietary Protein. Dr. Mark McGuire Dr. Jullie Wittman AVS Department University of Idaho

Dairy Update. Issue 110 July 1992 ALTERNATIVE FEEDSTUFFS FOR DAIRY. Vern Oraskovich Agriculture Extension Agent Carver County

Forage Testing and Supplementation

How Do I Supplement My Livestock With Minerals? Part IV

Fiber Digestibility & Corn Silage Evaluation. Joe Lawrence Cornell University PRO-DAIRY

Calcium Oxide and Calcium Hydroxide Treatment of Corn Silage

CHANGES IN RUMINAL MICROBIAL POPULATIONS IN TRANSITION DAIRY COWS

Feed and Alternative Uses for DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson and Dr. Sally Noll Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Prostaglandin F 2α. J. S. Stevenson, S. L. Pulley, and H. I. Mellieon, Jr.

Nutritional requirements

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

Better Understanding Forage Fiber and Digestibility

CHAPTER 1: ANIMAL ECOLOGY AND FORAGING BEHAVIOR... 1

Transcription:

Trends in Feed and Manure Phosphorus John Peters Soil Science Department UW-Madison

Acknowledgments Laboratory manure and TMR data provided by: Dairyland Laboratories, Inc. Rock River Laboratory, Inc. Digester/separator data provided by Gordondale Farms, Nelsonville, WI Dairy dietary P information provided by Mark Powell, USDA-ARS

Phosphorus story More than half of Wisconsin dairy farmers feed more P than cows need According to National Research Council recommendations Source: Powell et al., 2002 survey of 93 farms.

How much P is being fed? NRC 1989 What dairy producers fed (1999) Beginning Signs of P Deficiency NRC 2001 What dairy producers feed (today) 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.50 Dietary Phosphorus (% DM)

Potential annual phosphorus inputs and outputs from a 100 cow Wisconsin dairy farm P inputs P outputs (lb) (lb) Protein supplement 1219 Milk 1806 Dicalcium phosphate 1627 Cull cows/calves 300 Grain 0 Surplus Feed 0 Forage 0 Manure 0 Fertilizer 1181 Runoff 201 TOTALS 4027 TOTALS 2307 Farm P balance = +1,720 lb P

Phosphorus (P) story

Average soil P levels of Wisconsin cropland fields over time

Why is P overfed? Myth that increasing P improves reproductive performance Little research on the absolute minimum P content required to support moderate to high levels of milk production Aggressive marketing of P supplements Cheap and available protein feed sources that are high in P content

Debunking the myth: Milk production is not harmed by lower P diets Summary of 8 studies Milk Production (lbs/day) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Studies Low dietary P High dietary P

National Research Council (NRC) feed-p recommendations Milk Production Dietary P Level (lbs/day) (%) 55 0.32 77 0.35 99 0.36 120 0.38 Adapted from Nutrient Requirements for Dairy Cattle, Seventh Revised Edition, National Academy Press Washington, D.C., January 2001

New Assessment Tool: TMR Sample

Dietary P data from 89 high-producing dairy herds UW Soil & Forage Analysis Lab Marshfield, WI-2002 35 30 % of herds studied 25 20 15 10 5 NRC, 2001 0 0.25-0.30 0.31-0.35 0.36-0.40 0.41-0.45 0.46-0.50 0.51-0.55 0.56-0.60 Total Dietary P Level (wet chemistry analysis) 0.61-0.65

TMR Quality Control Dietary Phosphorus Results 1.00 0.90 0.80 y = -0.0001x + 4.223 R 2 = 0.0913 % P (DM basis) 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.49 0.39 0.20 0.10 0.00 03/02 10/02 04/03 11/03 05/04 12/04

Rock River Laboratory TMR Data 0.5 0.45 0.4 % P 0.35 0.3 0.25 Jan-01 Jul-01 Feb-02 Sep-02 Mar-03 Oct-03 Apr-04 Nov-04 Date

Dairyland Labs TMR Data 1.00% 0.90% 0.80% 0.70% 0.60% % P 0.50% 0.40% 0.30% 0.20% 0.10% 0.00% 10/6/03 11/25/03 1/14/04 3/4/04 4/23/04 6/12/04 8/1/04 9/20/04 11/9/04 Date

TMR Quality Control Dietary Calcium Results 3.00 2.50 y = 0.0001556x - 4.9311247 R 2 = 0.0277642 % Ca (DM basis) 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.88 1.03 0.50 0.00 03/02 10/02 04/03 11/03 05/04 12/04

TMR Quality Control Dietary Magnesium Results 3.50 % Mg (DM basis) 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 y = 0.0000123x - 0.1064697 R 2 = 0.0005549 0.50 0.35 0.36 0.00 08/02 02/03 09/03 03/04 10/04

TMR Quality Control Dietary Potassium Results % K (DM basis) 16.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 y = -0.0000232x + 2.4244994 R 2 = 0.0001248 1.53 1.54 0.00 08/02 02/03 09/03 03/04 10/04

Dietary P conclusions Performance (reproductive efficiency and milk production) is not adversely affected by reducing P to NRC recommendations Recent TMR tests indicate a trend toward reduced P levels in dairy rations

Effect of P intake on P in manure Fecal P, lb/cow/year 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.35 0.38 0.48 0.55 % P in diet Increasing P content from 0.35% to 0.55% of diet dry matter increases P output from 42 to 78 lbs/cow/year!

Effect of P intake on form of P in manure 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 Dietary P intake, % soluble P insoluble P A high P diet produces manure that is more likely to cause environmental problems.

Land required for recycling fecal P from one cow fed various dietary P levels 3 2.5 Acres 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.35% 0.38% 0.48% 0.55% Dietary P level Alfalfa, corn, soybean rotation with 27 lb P/a removal

UW Soil & Forage Analysis Laboratory Dairy Manure Summary P as P 2 O 5 12 10 Average lbs/1000 gal. (liquid) Average lbs/ton (solid) 8 6 4 2 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 0 Solid Liquid

Rock River Laboratory Dairy Manure Summary 10 P as P 2 O 5 Average lbs/1000 gal. (liquid) Average lbs/ton (solid) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Liquid Solid 0 May-Jun 2003 Jul-Sep 2003 Oct-Dec 2003 Jan-Mar 2004 Apr-Jun 2004 Jul-Sep 2004 Quarter

An Alternative Manure Handling Practice

Digested and Separated Manure Gordondale Farms, Nelsonville, WI 30 25 % Dry Matter 20 15 10 5 0 Digester - in Digester- out Separator liquid Separator solid

Digested and Separated Manure Gordondale Farms, Nelsonville, WI 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Digester - in Digesterout Total P2O5 (lbs/ton) 83% 17% Separator liquid Separator solid

Digested and Separated Manure Gordondale Farms, Nelsonville, WI 14 12 Total N (lbs/ton) 10 8 6 4 83% 17% 2 0 Digester - in Digesterout Separator liquid Separator solid

Digested and Separated Manure Gordondale Farms, Nelsonville, WI 4.5 4 Ammon. N (lbs/ton) 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 83% 17% 0.5 0 Digester - in Digesterout Separator liquid Separator solid

Summary An integrated approach to improving P nutrient management on dairy farms seems to be having an impact. TMR samples tested in Wisconsin show a trend toward decreased total P levels, bringing them more in line with NRC guidelines It appears that a trend toward reduced dairy dietary feed P levels is being reflected in average manure P levels as well.