Bronchial Thermoplasty For Severe Persistent Asthma

Similar documents
Endobronchial Thermoplasty

Endobronchial Thermoplasty

Complements asthma therapy NOT a CURE for Severe. Non pharmacologic treatment of asthma. limits the ability of the airways to constrict.

What is Severe Persistent Asthma? What is Bronchial Thermoplasty Non pharmacologic treatment of asthma

Smooth Muscle & Asthma: Bronchial Thermoplasty - A Smooth Muscle Modifier

HCT Medical Policy. Bronchial Thermoplasty. Policy # HCT113 Current Effective Date: 05/24/2016. Policy Statement. Overview

Robert Kruklitis, MD, PhD Chief, Pulmonary Medicine Lehigh Valley Health Network

Corporate Medical Policy

BRONCHIAL THERMOPLASTY

Bronchial Thermoplasty

THE PROMISE OF NEW AND NOVEL DRUGS. Pyng Lee Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine National University Hospital

Subject: Bronchial Thermoplasty

Bronchial Thermoplasty

The New Medtech Economic Reality MassMEDIC Annual Meeting

Bronchial Thermoplasty

Bronchial Thermoplasty

BRONCHIAL THERMOPLASTY

Biologic Therapy in the Management of Asthma. Nabeel Farooqui, MD

Endobronchial thermoplasty for asthma

Clinical Policy Title: Bronchial thermoplasty for severe asthma

West of Scotland Difficult Asthma Group Statement of Practice

BRONCHIAL THERMOPLASTY

Five Consecutive cases of Bronchial Thermoplasty

Asthma Treatment Update: 2018

Bronchial Thermoplasty for the Treatment of Severe Asthma

BRONCHIAL THERMOPLASTY

Clinical Policy Title: Bronchial thermoplasty for severe asthma

Medical Review Criteria Bronchial Thermoplasty

New TLD Indication: Asthma RELIEF-1 Study. Nick ten Hacken, MD Study Co-Principal Investigator

Usefulness of Bronchial Thermoplasty for Patients with a Deteriorating Lung Function

Learning the Asthma Guidelines by Case Studies

Running Head: THE PRACTICALITY OF BRONCHIAL THERMOPLASTY 1. Review of a New Treatment for Severe Asthma: The Practicality of Bronchial Thermoplasty

#1 cause of school absenteeism in children 13 million missed days annually

Interventional Pulmonology

Prof Neil Barnes. Respiratory and General Medicine London Chest Hospital and The Royal London Hospital

Difficult Asthma Assessment: A systematic approach

BRONCHIAL THERMOPLASTY AND OTHER ADVANCES IN NON- PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ASTHMA AND COPD. -Shailesh Agrawal

Cigna Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy

Searching for Targets to Control Asthma

Phenotypes of asthma; implications for treatment. Medical Grand Rounds Feb 2018 Jim Martin MD DSc

Add on therapy in asthma. Local experience in context J Paul Dilworth, Nicola Marks, Lauren Geddes

Introduction to Interventional Pulmonology

BRONCHIAL THERMOPLASTY

Biologic Therapies for Treatment of Asthma Associated with Type 2 Inflammation: Effectiveness, Value, and Value-Based Price Benchmarks

Severe Asthma(s): Can THEY be prevented or reversed?

Case-Compare Impact Report

WEBINAR. Difficult-to-treat and severe asthma: changing the paradigm

Biologics in asthma Are we turning the corner? Roland Buhl Pulmonary Department Mainz University Hospital

Bronchial thermoplasty: a new therapeutic option for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma in adults

Asthma Management for the Athlete

Asma e BPCO: le strategie terapeutiche

Improving Outcomes in the Management & Treatment of Asthma. April 21, Spring Managed Care Forum

Meeting the Challenges of Asthma

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Asthma Upate 2018: What s New Since the 2007 Asthma Guidelines of NAEPP?

Asthma Update A/Prof. John Abisheganaden. Senior Consultant, Dept Of Respiratory & Crit Care Medicine Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) What s new in GINA 2016?

Dr Christopher Worsnop

Cigna Medical Coverage Policy

Biologic Agents in the treatment of Severe Asthma

SEVERE ASTHMA - EVIDENCE TABLES APPENDIX 1

Outline FEF Reduced FEF25-75 in asthma. What does it mean and what are the clinical implications?

New Therapies for Asthma

Traiter l asthme sévère par le phénotype. Dr. Alain Michils CUB-Hôpital Erasme

LINEE GUIDA DELL ASMA: UP TO DATE

Diagnosis and Management of Fungal Allergy Monday, 9-139

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Xolair (Omalizumab) Drug Prior Authorization Protocol (Medical Benefit & Part B Benefit)

Is reslizumab effective in improving quality of life and asthma control in adolescent and adult patients with poorly controlled eosinophilic asthma?

Do We Need Biologics in Pediatric Asthma Management?

Asthma in Day to Day Practice

Asthma Therapy 2017 JOSHUA S. JACOBS, M.D.

Dual-Controller Asthma Therapy: Rationale and Clinical Benefits

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

The Acute & Maintenance Treatment of Asthma via Aerosolized Medications

Targeting Interleukin-5 in Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Clinical Review

Current Asthma Therapy: Little Need to Phenotype. Phenotypes of Severe Asthma. Cellular Phenotypes 12/7/2012

Clinical efficacy of montelukast in anti-inflammatory treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis

2/4/2019. GOLD Objectives. GOLD 2019 Report: Chapters

TORCH: Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate and Survival in COPD

Treating the right patient with the right

Immunomodulators: Anti-IgE mab. Thomas B. Casale, MD Professor of Medicine Chief, Allergy/Immunology Creighton University Omaha, NE

12/18/2017. Disclosures. Asthma Management Updates: A Focus on Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonists and Intermittent Inhaled Corticosteroid Dosing

Asthma Hetereogeneity, Phenotypes and Endotypes Choosing the Right Biologic for your Patient

Advancements in Asthma Therapy: Bronchial Thermoplasty

Asthma Management Updates: A Focus on Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonists and Intermittent Inhaled Corticosteroid Dosing

Update on Biologicals for ABPA and Asthma

ASTHMA IN THE PEDIATRIC POPULATION

Asthma Management in Pregnancy HEATHER HOWE, MD UNIVERSITY OF UTAH PULMONARY DIVISION

Omalizumab (Xolair ) ( Genentech, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.) September Indication

Step up if needed (first, check adherence, environmental control and comorbid conditions) Patients ASSESS CONTROL. Step down if possible

Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) What s new in GINA 2017?

Cigna Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy

The methodology behind GINA and EPR-3 medication recommendations: Stepwise treatment in asthma

Breakfast Session Prof Neil Barnes Professor of Respiratory Medicine London Chest Hospital & The Royal London Hospital United Kingdom

DR REBECCA THOMAS CONSULTANT RESPIRATORY PHYSICIAN YORK DISTRICT HOSPITAL

Asthma: Chronic Management. Yung-Yang Liu, MD Attending physician, Chest Department Taipei Veterans General Hospital April 26, 2015

SEVERE ASTHMA NUCALA 100MG SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION THE FIRST TARGETED ANTI IL-5 ADD-ON TREATMENT FOR ADULTS WITH SEVERE REFRACTORY EOSINOPHILIC ASTHMA

Severe Asthma & Exacerbations: Dawn of a New Era?

SYNOPSIS A two-stage randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase III, multicenter, 7-month study to assess the efficacy and safety of SYMBICORT

Transcription:

Bronchial Thermoplasty For Severe Persistent Asthma Faisal Khan MD Center For Respiratory and Sleep Medicine Indiana Internal Medicine Consultants Franciscan Saint Francis hospital

Agenda Burden of Severe Asthma What is Bronchial Thermoplasty (BT) Clinical Studies Who are the Right Patients for BT? 2

What is Severe Asthma? ERS/ATS 2014 Guidelines: Severe asthma is defined as asthma which requires treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus a second controller (and/or systemic corticosteroids) to prevent it from becoming uncontrolled or which remains uncontrolled despite this therapy. 1 ERS = European Respiratory Society ATS = American Thoracic Society 1. Chung KF, et al. Eur Respir J. 2014 Feb;43(2):343 73. 5% 10% of total asthma population estimated to have severe asthma 1 3

Uncontrolled Asthma Frequent exacerbations: 2 or more bursts of systemic CSs (>3 days each) in the previous year Severe exacerbations: at least one hospitalization, ICU stay or mechanical ventilation in the previous year Bousquet J et al, JACI 2010

Implications of Uncontrolled Asthma (U.S.) 1 13.9 million People experience asthma attacks 10.6 million Asthma physician office visits 2.1 million Emergency department visits 479,300 Hospitalizations 3,388 Asthma related deaths 1. Moorman JE, Akinbami LJ, Bailey CM, et al. National Surveillance of Asthma: United States, 2001 2010. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 3(35). 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_03/sr03_035.pdf 7

Higher Cost of Severe Asthma (U.S.) Higher healthcare costs with asthma severity 2 Cost/Patient/Year $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 Est. $56B $4,800 $12,800 $12,000 total cost of asthma 1 Increased healthcare utilization Emergency Room (ER) visits Hospitalizations Patients with exacerbations have higher health care costs than patients without exacerbations 3 $2,000 $2,200 Mild Moderate Severe 1. Barnett SBL, et al. Costs of asthma in the United States: 2002 2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:145 52. 2. Cisternas M, et al., A comprehensive study of the direct and indirect costs of an adult with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111(6):1212-1218. 3. American Lung Association, Trends in Asthma Morbidity and Mortality, February 2010 report. 8

Intervention Available When Medications Are Not Enough GINA Stepwise Approach to Control Symptoms and Minimize Future Risk 1 : Bronchial Thermoplasty* is included as a preferred add on treatment option in Step 5 Chronic OCS is an option after other addon treatments are considered *Non pharmacological add on intervention 1. Adapted from Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, updated 2014. www.ginasthma.org/documents/4 9

What is Bronchial Thermoplasty (BT)? Non pharmacological intervention Safe, minimally invasive Clinically proven Complementary treatment to asthma maintenance medications that control inflammation Not a cure for asthma or a replacement for drug therapy 10

BT Reduces Excess Airway Smooth Muscle (ASM) 1 Reduce Airway Smooth Muscle (ASM) Reduce Bronchoconstriction Reduce Asthma Exacerbations Improve Asthma Quality of Life 1. Woodruff PG, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:1001 1006. 11

BT Completed in 3 Outpatient Procedures BT is performed by a BT-certified pulmonologist in 3 outpatient visits, typically scheduled 3 weeks apart. 12

Procedure Overview Patient evaluated pre procedure to verify stability and ability to undergo bronchoscopy Prophylactic OCS (50mg/day) administered for 5 days (3 days before, day of, and day after procedure) Routinely performed under moderate sedation RF energy delivered to airways between 3 10 mm diameter (~60 activations per procedure) and typically completed in less than an hour Patient monitored 2 4 hours post op and discharged home same day Lung function stable within 80% of pre procedure post BD FEV 1 13

Post Procedure/Patient Follow Up Patient contacted via phone at 1, 2 and 7 days to assess post procedure status Office visit at 2 to 3 weeks to assess clinical stability and schedule subsequent BT procedures as appropriate After 3 6 months of BT treatment, patients are evaluated for step down therapy to determine lowest level of medication necessary to maintain asthma control 14

The Alair System Alair Catheter a flexible tube with an expandable wire array at the tip to deliver therapeutic RF energy to the airway walls via a standard bronchoscope Alair Radiofrequency (RF) Controller designed to safely and accurately deliver precise, controlled RF energy through the Catheter to the airway walls 15

BT, Delivered by the Alair System 16

Reduced Airway Smooth Muscle 3 years post treatment (canine model) 1 ASM Ciliated Epithelium Ciliated Epithelium ASM Reduced Parenchyma Parenchyma UNTREATED TREATED Masson s Trichrome stain 1. Data on file. 17

BT Treatment Effect Airway Responsiveness to Local Methacholine Challenge 1 Canine Model: Airway on left treated with BT. Airway on right was not treated. 1. Cox et al. Eur Respir Journal. 2004;24: 659-663. 18

BT Clinical Studies 12+ years of clinical experience AIR2 1 2005 2012 Randomized, double blind, shamcontrolled study N = 190 (190 BT, 98 sham) Evaluate safety and effectiveness in patients with severe persistent asthma Feasibility 4 2000 2007 AIR 3 2002 2010 RISA 2 2004 2010 Randomized, controlled study N = 55 Evaluate safety and reduction in patients with moderate to severe asthma Non randomized, prospective study N = 16 Evaluate safety in patients with mild to severe asthma Randomized, controlled study N = 16 Evaluate safety and reduction in medications and asthma symptoms in patients with severe, refractory asthma AIR2 = Asthma Intervention Research 2 RISA = Research in Severe Asthma AIR = Asthma Intervention Research 4 clinical studies in patients with asthma 3 randomized, controlled, clinical studies, with 1 shamcontrolled 5 years of follow up All BT studies published in top peer reviewed journals 1. Castro et al., AJRCCM 2010; Castro et al., AnnAAI 2011; Wechsler et al., JACI 2013 2. Pavord et al., AJRCCM 2007; Pavord et al., AnnAA 2013 3. Cox et al., NEJM 2007; Thomson et al., BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2011 4. Cox et al., AJRCCM 2006; Cox et al., AJRCCM 2010 20

Asthma Intervention Research 2 (AIR2) Trial 1 Randomized 2:1 (n=297) Multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, sham controlled Year 0 (n=190) BT Sham Year 0 (n=98) Year 1 (n=181) AIR2 1 year Year 1 (n=97) Exit study Pivotal U.S. study to evaluate safety and effectiveness of BT with the Alair System in adult patients with severe asthma. Study Population: patients with severe persistent asthma symptomatic despite high dose ICS (>1,000 mg/d beclomethasone or equivalent) + LABA (>100 mg/d salmeterol or equivalent). 2 AIR2 Trial Objective: BT superior to sham Primary Endpoint: AQLQ score (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) Other Endpoints and Analyses: Severe exacerbations*, ER visits, Days lost from work/school/other daily activities due to asthma symptoms 1. Castro M, et al, for the AIR2 Trial Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:116 124. 2. Severe asthma classification based on treatment in Steps 5 or 6 per the NAEPP 2007 guidelines. * Exacerbations requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids or a doubling of ICS 21

Demonstrated Clinical Effectiveness at 1 Year 1 Improved asthma related quality of life compared to shamcontrol (AQLQ score) Difference in AQLQ score between groups was 0.21 (PPS=96.0%) 1.35 mean improvement in BT group compared to Baseline 79% of BT treated patients achieved 0.5 increase versus 64% of sham treated patients (PPS=99.6%) Improved clinical outcomes compared to sham control: 32% decrease in severe exacerbations (PPS=95.5%) 84% reduction in emergency room (ER) visits for respiratory symptoms (PPS=99.9%) 66% less days lost from work, school and other daily activities due to asthma (PPS=99.3%) PPS = Posterior Probability of Superiority 1. Castro M, et al, for the AIR2 Trial Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:116 124. 22

Improved Asthma Related Quality of Life (AQLQ Score) 1 BT group demonstrated a clinical treatment effect over the sham group AQLQ score for patients treated with BT increased 1.35 over baseline through 12 months (integrated AQLQ) 1.6 Average Score Change in AQLQ Score from Baseline 1.4 1.2 1 0 3 Mon 6 Mon 9 Mon 12 Mon BT (N=190) Sham (N=98) Difference in AQLQ score between groups was 0.21 (PPS=96.0%) Clinical treatment effect persistent across 6, 9, and 12 months 1. Castro M, et al, for the AIR2 Trial Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:116 124. 23

Who Responds to BT? The AIR2 Trial was performed on patients with severe asthma phenotype : 79% responder rate 1,2 Patients with lower AQLQ or higher ACQ scores at baseline (implying poor asthma control) responded better to BT 3 Clinical response to BT in self reported allergic patients (54.5%) and non allergic patients (45.5%) was similar 2 Responder = Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score improvement >0.5 Severe asthma classification based on required treatment with high dose ICS + LABA to maintain control (treatment in Steps 5 or 6 per the NAEPP 2007 guidelines). 1. Castro M, et al, for the AIR2 Trial Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:116 124. 2. Wechsler ME, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1295 1302. 3. Data on file. 24

High Patient Satisfaction with BT 97% of BT patients would probably or definitely recommend BT to a friend or family member. 1 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Definitely No Probably No Probably Yes Definitely Yes 1. Data on file. Reported at 1 year follow-up. 25

AIR2 Respiratory Adverse Events 1,2 Selected AEs with >3% incidence and difference between groups Adverse Event Treatment Period (~12 weeks) BT (N=190) % Sham (N=98) % Post-Treatment Period (~46 weeks) BT (N=187) % Sham (N=98) % Asthma (Multiple Symptom) 52.1 38.8 * 27.3 * 42.9 Wheezing 15.3 6.1 * 4.3 3.1 Atelectasis 4.7 0 * 0 0 Hemoptysis 3.2 0 * 0 0 Lower Respiratory Tract Infection 7.9 2.0 * 3.2 6.1 Upper Respiratory Tract Infection 20.0 11.2 * 29.9 25.5 Nasopharyngitis 4.7 7.1 10.7 5.1 * Throat irritation 4.7* 12.2 1.1 3.1 *Posterior Probability of Superiority (PPS) >95.0% 1. Castro M, et al, for the AIR2 Trial Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:116 124. 2. Data on file. 26

Hospitalization Risk for Respiratory Symptoms Following Procedure 1 Respiratory Related Hospitalizations during Treatment Period BT (N=190) Sham (N=98) Events / Patient (%) 19/190 (10%)* 2/98 (2.0%) Events / Bronchoscopy (%) 19/558 (3.4%) 2 2/292 (0.7%) *10/19 (53%) in the BT group occurred on the day of the procedure. Time period beginning at first bronchoscopy to 6 weeks after the third bronchoscopy (approx. 12 week period). 1. Castro M, et al, for the AIR2 Trial Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:116-124. 2. Data on file. 27

AIR2 Trial 5 Year Extension Study AIR2 Trial 5 Year Extension Study Post Approval Study 28

AIR2 5 Year Extension Study 1 Randomized 2:1 (n=297) Year 0 (n=190) BT Sham Year 0 (n=98) Year 1 (n=181) AIR2 1 year Year 1 (n=97) Exit study Year 2 (n=165) Year 3 (n=162) Year 4 (n=159) AIR2 5 year AIR2 Extension Study Objective: Durability of effect Primary Endpoint: % of patients with severe exacerbation* at Years 2, 3, 4 and 5 is non inferior to Year 1 Year 5 (n=162) Retention rate (from n=190) = 85.2% 1. Wechsler ME, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1295-1302. * Exacerbations requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids or a doubling of ICS Secondary Endpoints: Severe exacerbations, ER visits for respiratory symptoms, Lung function (Pre BD FEV 1 ), Respiratory adverse events 29

Reduction in Severe Exacerbations Maintained out to 5 years 1 The reduction in severe exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids at Year 1 was maintained out to at least 5 years. % of Patients with Severe Exacerbations Severe Exacerbation Event Rates Compared with 1 year prior to BT treatment (baseline): 44% average decrease in percentage of patients having severe exacerbations 48% average decrease in severe exacerbation event rates 1. Wechsler ME, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1295-1302. 30

Reduction in ER Visits Maintained out to 5 years 1 The reduction in ER visits for respiratory symptoms at Year 1 was maintained out to at least 5 years. % of Patients with ER Visits ER Visit Event Rates Compared with 1 year prior to BT treatment (baseline): 78% average decrease in percentage of patients having ER visits 88% average decrease in ER visit event rates 1. Wechsler ME, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1295-1302. 31

BT Responder vs. Non Responder Analysis Across 5 year follow up, severe exacerbation rates, respiratory AE rates, asthma (multiple symptoms) AE rates, and rates of ER visits and hospitalizations for respiratory symptoms remained higher in the nonresponders vs. BT responders BT Responder: AQLQ score change 0.5 from baseline to Year 1 Non Responder: AQLQ score change < 0.5 from baseline to Year 1 1. Wechsler ME, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1295-1302. 32

BT Response in Allergic and Non Allergic Patients No difference in the percentage of patients experiencing severe exacerbations, ER visits, asthma symptoms and hospitalizations over 5 years based on patient self reported allergy status 1,2 1. Wechsler ME, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1295-1302. 2. Additional data on file. 33

No Increase in Hospitalizations over 5 Years 1 Year prior to BT Treatment (n=190) Year 1 (n=181) Year 2 (n=165) Year 3 (n=162) Year 4 (n=159) Year 5 (n=162) Total number of hospitalizations for respiratory symptoms Patients with hospitalizations for respiratory symptoms percentage of Patients with hospitalizations for respiratory symptoms (%) 10 7 10 11 12 4 8 6 7 10 9 3 4.2 3.3 4.2 6.2 5.7 1.9 95% CI 1.4, 7.1 0.7, 5.9 1.2, 7.3 2.5, 9.9 2.1, 9.3 0.0, 3.9 Note: 3 patients had 20 of the total hospitalizations (45.5%) 1. Wechsler ME, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1295-1302. 34

Long Term Safety Maintained out to 5 Years 1 No structural changes in airways that were clinically significant were due to BT at 5 years (based on HRCT review) No evidence of increase in bronchiectasis No evidence of bronchiolitis obliterans or pulmonary emphysema in any patient Percent predicted pre BD FEV 1 values remained unchanged over the 5 years after BT. Post BD FEV 1 remained higher at all times; Increase in percent predicted FEV 1 at baseline of 8.2% and at 5 years of 5.9% 1. Wechsler ME, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1295-1302. 35

Cost Effectiveness (Data favorable but limited) Treatment with BT resulted in 6.40 QALYs and $7512 in cost compared to 6.21 QALYs and $2054 for usual care The incremental cost effectiveness ratio for BT at 10 years was $29 821/QALY (WTP $50000/QALY) BT continues to be cost effective unless The probability of severe asthma exacerbation drops below 0.63 exacerbation per year or The cost of BT rises above $10 384 total for all three bronchoscopic (baseline = $6690 as of 2013) Cost Effectiveness of Bronchial Thermoplasty in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. J.G. Zein MD et al, Journal of Asthma Vol 53, Issue 02, 2016

Cost Effectiveness (5 year data) The chance of BT being cost effective compared with omalizumab and standard therapy was 67% at the WTP of $100,000/QALY Z. Zafari et al; PLoS One. 2016; 11(1): e0146003. Cost Effectiveness of Bronchial Thermoplasty, Omalizumab, and Standard Therapy for Moderate to Severe Allergic Asthma

Who are the Right Patients for BT? 38

Bronchial Thermoplasty Indication The Alair Bronchial Thermoplasty System has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of severe persistent asthma in patients 18 years and older whose asthma is not well controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long acting beta agonists (LABA). Reference the Alair Bronchial Thermoplasty System Directions for Use for more information. 39

How to Assess a BT Patient Confirmed diagnosis of severe asthma Evidence of adherence to ICS and LABA Demonstration of asthma impairments and/or risks of future exacerbations Examples may include: Chronic oral corticosteroid use Anti IgE therapy candidate or non responder Two or more severe exacerbations in the prior year Impaired quality of life (assessed by AIS 6, ACT, AQLQ) Higher level care or add on treatment needed Exclusion of BT contraindications 40

BT should not be performed on: Contraindications Patients that have a pacemaker, internal defibrillator, or other implantable electronic device Patients that have a known sensitivity to medications required to perform bronchoscopy, including lidocaine, atropine, and benzodiazepines Patients that have previously been treated with the Alair System Patient within 2 weeks of acute flare up. Bleeding risk: disorder or AP, AC drugs Reference the Alair Bronchial Thermoplasty System Directions for Use for more information. 41

BT Study Publications AIR2 Wechsler ME, et al., Bronchial Thermoplasty: Long Term Safety and Effectiveness in Patients with Severe Persistent Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1295 1302. Full article: www.jacionline.org/article/s0091 6749(13)01268 2/fulltext Castro M, et al., Persistence of Effectiveness of Bronchial Thermoplasty in Patients with Severe Asthma. Annals of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology, 2011;107(1):65 70. Abstract: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21704887 Castro M, et al., Effectiveness and Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in the Treatment of Severe Asthma: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Sham Controlled Clinical Trial. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 2010;181: 116 124. Full article: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc3269231/pdf/ajrccm1812116.pdf RISA Pavord ID, et al., Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in Patients with Severe Refractory Asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Nov;111(5):402 7. Abstract: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24125149 Pavord ID, et al., Safety and Efficacy of Bronchial Thermoplasty in Symptomatic Severe Asthma. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 2007; 176: 1185 1191. Full article: www.atsjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1164/rccm.200704 571OC AIR Thomson N, et al., Long term (5 year) Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty: Asthma Intervention Research (AIR) Trial. BMC Medicine, 2011; 11:8. Cox G, et al., Asthma Control During the Year After Bronchial Thermoplasty. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007; 356: 1327 1337. 42

Questions? 43