Archives 2017 vol.2 1-9

Similar documents
Global College of Pharmacy, Kahnpur Khui, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, Distt.- Ropar, Punjab, India

World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research SJIF Impact Factor 5.990

COMPARATIVE IN VITRO EVALUATION OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE PANTOPRAZOLE DELAYED RELEASE TABLETS

Biowaiver Study on Prednisolone Tablets 5 mg in Three Different Brands. Marketed in Sudan. Safaa Mohamed *, Tilal Elsaman

J Pharm Sci Bioscientific Res (4): ISSN NO

STABILITY STUDIES OF FORMULATED CONTROLLED RELEASE ACECLOFENAC TABLETS

Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Life Science ISSN Vol. 2 (2), July-Sept,2012

Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research

Evaluation of Pharmaceutical and Chemical Equivalence of Selected Brands of Diclofenac Sodium Tablets J.O. AYORINDE*, M.A. ODENIYI AND A.O.

Quality Assessment of Different Brands of Rabeprazole Tablets Marketed In Some Nigerian Cities

Available online Research Article

Formulation and evaluation of immediate release salbutamol sulphate

STUDIES ON EFFECT OF BINDERS ON ETORICOXIB TABLET FORMULATIONS

ISSN: ; CODEN ECJHAO E-Journal of Chemistry 2011, 8(3),

Research Article. Chemical equivalence three brands of Aspirin sold in Sokoto State

This revision also necessitates a change in the table numbering in the test for Organic Impurities.

Int. Res J Pharm. App Sci., 2014; 4(1):47-51 ISSN:

Scholars Research Library. Der Pharmacia Lettre, 2015, 7 (5):44-49 (

Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Medicinal Chemistry Journal home page:

IJRPC 2011, 1(4) Rohan et al. ISSN: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY

Comparative in-vitro evaluation of four different brands of metformin HCl available in Kanpur district, India

Available online at Scholars Research Library

COMPARISON OF QUALITY CONTROL OF TWO DIFFERENT B-COMPLEX TABLETS AND THEIR LEGISLATIVE ISSUES ON THE ALBANIAN PHARMACEUTICAL MARKET

Formulation and In-vitro Evaluation of Chewable Tablets of Montelukast Sodium

Research Article Derivative Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of Metformin Hydrochloride in Bulk Drug and Dosage Form

A simple validated RP-HPLC method for quantification of sumatriptan succinate in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form

contents of the currently official monograph. Please refer to the current edition of the USP NF for official text.

IJPRD, 2012; Vol 4(10): December-2012 ( ) International Standard Serial Number

Optimization of valsartan tablet formulation by 2 3 factorial design

Development and Validation of a UV-Spectrophotometric Method for Quantification of Atorvastatin in Tablets

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2015, 7(5): Research Article

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

Available online Research Article

FABRICATION AND EVALUATION OF GLIMEPIRIDE CORDIA DICHOTOMA G.FORST FRUIT MUCILAGE SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD ESTIMATION OF TOLVAPTAN IN BULK PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION

Scholars Research Library. Der Pharmacia Lettre, 2016, 8 (3): (

A HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHIC ASSAY FOR LERCANIDIPINE HYDROCHLORIDE

REVERSE PHASE HPLC METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF ALFUZOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORMS

contents of the monograph in effect today. Please refer to the current edition of the USP NF for official text.

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF DILTIAZEM HYDROCHLORIDE COLON TARGETED TABLETS

Compliance. Should you have any questions, please contact Behnaz Almasi, Associate Scientific Liaison ( or

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF LACOSAMIDE IN BULK AND ITS PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION

PREPARATION AND INVITRO EVALUATION OF RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM DELAYED RELEASE ENTERIC COATED TABLETS

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

Formulation and In-vitro Evaluation of Sumatriptan succinate Bilayer Tablets

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF PIROXICAM AND CELECOXIB TABLETS EMPLOYING PROSOLVE BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD

Development and Validation of a New Uv Method for the Analysis of Rebamipide

36 J App Pharm Vol. 6; Issue 1: 36-42; January, 2014 Rao et al., 2014

Karnataka Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, H.K.E. Society s College of Pharmacy, Gulbarga, Karnataka ABSTRACT KEYWORDS:

Formulation and Development of Sustained Release Tablets of Valsartan Sodium

Pelagia Research Library

Formulation and Evaluation

Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric estimation of lisinopril dihydrate in bulk and tablet dosage form using area under curve method

Post Marketing Surveillance on Propranolol and Atenolol Tablets Manufactured in Iran

Formulation and Evaluation of Gastroretentive Dosage form of Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride.

Formulation and evaluation of sublingual tablets of lisinopril

Diltiazem Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules. Type of Posting Posting Date Official Date

ISSN: X CODEN: IJPTFI Available Online through Research Article

A. General Appearance

195 J App Pharm Vol. 6; Issue 2: ; April, 2014 Nebal & Haider, 2014

Tramadol Hydrochloride Extended-Release Tablets. Expert Committee Chemical Medicines Monographs 2 Reason for Revision Compliance

Development and evaluation of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets of Tramadol Hydrochloride

Volume: 2: Issue-3: July-Sept ISSN FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS OF NICORANDIL

The present manuscript describes simple, sensitive, rapid, accurate, precise and cost effective First derivative

Short Communication. Formulation of Furosemide Dispersible Tablets for Use in Paediatrics V. V. ABWOVA, P. N. MBEO, L. J. TIROP AND K. A. M.

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences

MEDAK DIST. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, INDIA. Research Article RECEIVED ON ACCEPTED ON

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

7. SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Corresponding Author:

210 J App Pharm Vol. 6; Issue 2: ; April, 2014 Mustafa et al, 2014

ASSAY AND IMPURITY METHOD FOR DURACOR TABLETS BY HPLC

International Journal of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Research

Comparative in-vitro bioequivalence analysis of some brands of ciprofloxacin HCl tablets marketed in Ethiopia

A Comparative Evaluation of Cross Linked Starch Urea-A New Polymer and Other Known Polymers for Controlled Release of Diclofenac

L. Sriphong, A. Chaidedgumjorn, and K. Chaisuroj

Available Online through Research Article

Development and validation of analytical methods for estimation of imatinib mesylate in bulk and solid dosage forms by UV spectroscopy

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD FOR ASSAY AND DISSOLUTION OF METOPROLOL SUCCINATE EXTENDED RELEASE TABLETS

Development and validation of UV-visible spectrophotometric method for estimation of rifapentine in bulk and dosage form

Development and Validation of Area Under Curve Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Thiocolchicoside and Lornoxicam in Tablet Dosage Form

Pharmacopeial Forum 818 INTERIM REVISION ANNOUNCEMENT Vol. 35(4) [July Aug. 2009] ERRATA

Validated RP-HPLC Method for the Estimation of Esomeprazole Enteric Coated Tablets

In vitro Evaluation of Some Different Brands of Alprazolam Tablets

Preparation and Evaluation of Silymarin Controlled Release Tablets Prepared Using Natural Gums

In Vitro Comparative Study of Different Brands of Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric Coated Tablets Marketed In Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

International Journal of Advances in Pharmacy and Biotechnology Vol.3, Issue-1, 2017, 1-7 Research Article Open Access.

DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF CONTROLLED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS OF FLURBIPROFEN

The Nitrofurantoin Capsules Revision Bulletin supersedes the currently official monograph.

Design and development of fast Melting Tablets of Terbutaline Sulphate

CHAPTER INTRODUCTION OF DOSAGE FORM AND LITERATURE REVIEW

UV-Spectrophotometric methods for estimation of Valsartan in bulk and tablet dosage form

Research Article Simultaneous Estimation of DL-Methionine and Pyridoxine Hydrochloride in Tablet Dosage Form by RP-HPLC

Residue Monograph prepared by the meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 82 nd meeting 2016.

Development and validation of spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of Sumatriptan and Naproxen sodium in tablet dosage form

Development and Validation of A Spectrophotometric Method for Quantification and Dissolution Studies of Glimepiride in Tablets

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

PHARMA SCIENCE MONITOR AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES

372 J App Pharm Vol. 6; Issue 4: ; October, 2014 Moazzem et al, 2014

Scholars Research Library

Transcription:

August 30, 2017 Archives 2017 vol.2 1-9 Comparative Quality Evaluation of Different Brands of Esomeprazole Tablets Available In pharmaceutical market of Bangladesh Sultana, S 1, Oby dulla 1 *, Md. Shohag Hosen 1 1 Dept. of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka-1209, Abstract Bangladesh mamun94@diu.edu.bd Esomeprazole is the S-isomer of omeprazole, used to treat gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD). It is widely produced and marketed drug by many pharmaceutical companies in Bangladesh. The aim of the study is to compare the different physical parameters including hardness, friability, diameter, thickness, disintegration time, dissolution test and assay for quality evaluation and characterization of tablets of five different brands of Bangladeshi pharmaceutical company. The specified compendial method is followed for their evaluation test. Esomeprazole Mg tablets are enteric coated tablet, there is no disintegration for any brand occurred in 0.1N HCl after 2 hours and all tablets are disintegrated within 30 minutes in phosphate buffer (ph 6.8). Hardness ranges from 5.32 to 7.12 kg/cm2. Drug release after 2 hours in 0.1N HCl were varied from 2.55% to 4.47% which is less than 10% and in phosphate buffer (ph 6.8) the percentage of drug release are between 100.9% and 102.4% after 60 minutes. In case of assay the results of all brands are between 95.28% and 99.40%. The obtained results of all parameters are complied with pharmacopoeial limit. So from this study we can conclude that products of esomeprazole available in Bangladeshi pharmaceutical market meet the quality parameter to satisfy therapeutic efficacy. Keywords: Esomeprazole, GERD, Proton pump inhibitor, Disintegration, Assay. ISSN: 1820-8620

PhOL Sultana, et al. 2 (pag 1-9) Introduction Esomeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor for the treatment of acid-related diseases such as dyspepsia, peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome mainly work by preventing the formation of stomach acid through inhibition of the H+/K+ -ATPase in the parietal cells of the stomach [1, 2] For the wellbeing of the patients, quality of medicine is an absolute necessity. World Health Organization claimed that the manufacturers must undertake responsibility for the quality of the drugs that they produced. [3] Pharmaceutical industry of Bangladesh is now technologically sound with advanced manufacturing facilities. It has grown in the last two decades. After the dissemination of Drug Control Ordinance - 1982, the development of this sector was accelerated. For these developments, the key factors are the skills and knowledge of the professionals and innovative ideas of the people involved in this industry. About 300 pharmaceutical companies are operating at the moment. Only 3% of the drugs are imported, the remaining 97% come from local companies. [4] Bangladeshi drugs are exporting worldwide including the United States because of its positive developments in the pharmaceutical sector. This sector can develop more and can be an effective exporting sector of Bangladesh if these sectors overcome the underlying obstacles like API importation. [4, 5] The principal criteria for a quality drug product are safety, potency, efficacy, and stability. [6] The major objective of this work is to find out the current status of the quality of the marketed Esomeprazole preparations available in Bangladesh. This work will increase awareness among the health practitioners and drug control authority so that, pharmaceutical manufacturers are forced to produce quality medicine. This study will also provide a comprehensive knowledge about the weight variation, hardness, disintegration, dissolution, percentage of potency of Esomeprazole Mg tablets available in the market and compares these values with the official specifications. Materials and Methods Five brands of Esomeprazole tablets, manufactured by five different manufacturers of Bangladesh with labelled contents of 20 mg were obtained from local market. All tablets were of same manufacturing year Instruments Dissolution Test Apparatus USP (Minhua, RC-8), UV Visible Spectrophotometer (T60U PG Instruments, England).Electronic Balance (Ohaus CP213 China), Hardness Tester (Monsanto), Friability tester, Disintegration Test Apparatus (Aesico, CAT NO 20066B). Reagents Sodium hydroxide (Merck, Germany), and 0.1N HCl, potassium dihydrogen phosphate (Scharlu, Spain) and dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (Scharlu, Spain), distilled water. All the reagents are analytical grade. Collection of Samples There are many brands of Esomeprazole tablets in Bangladesh. Samples were collected from retail medicine shop of different areas of Dhaka city and collected samples covered top, middle and lower companies ranked by Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Index, 3Q 2011. The samples were properly checked for their physical appearance, the name of the manufacturer, batch number, manufacturing data, expiration date, manufacturing license number, drug administration registration number, and the maximum retail price at the time of purchase. The samples were then properly coded for analysis (E01, E02, E03, E04, and E05). Collection of Standard The reference standard of Esomeprazole was obtained from Incepta Pharmaceutical Ltd. as gift sample for research. The purity of the reference standard was 92.11%. Weight Variation Determination 20 tablets from each brand products were weighed individually in a weighing balance.the average weight of the tablet, as well as their percentage deviation, were calculated (Table 1). [7] Individual weight average weight % of weight variation = 100 Average weight Hardness Test Hardness indicates the capability of a tablet to withstand mechanical shocks during handling in manufacturing, packaging, and shipping. [8] The hardness of five brands of Esomeprazole was determined and the observed results are shown in the table-2. Disintegration Test 6 tablets from each brand were used for the disintegration test in 0.1N HCl at 37 ± 2 C for 2 hours and then in phosphate buffer (ph 6.8) using a disintegration apparatus. The disintegration time was taken to be the time when no particle remained on the basket (Table 3). [9]

PhOL Sultana, et al. 3 (pag 1-9) Assay Preparation of Standard Curve: 10 mg of Esomeprazole Mg was measured by the electronic balance and placed in a 100ml volumetric flask and dissolved phosphate buffer (ph 6.8).The concentration of the solution was attained 100μg/ml by adding phosphate buffer (ph 6.8) up to 100 ml.1ml of a solution was taken from the 100 ml of volumetric flask and phosphate buffer was added up to 10 ml and the concentration was 10μg/ml. A series of the standard solution of Esomeprazole e.g. 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16 μg/ml, were taken to measure absorbance at 300 nm against a blank for each solution by UVspectrophotometer.The measured absorbance s were plotted against the respective concentration of the standard solutions which give a straight line (Figure 3). Preparation of standard solution: To prepare a standard solution, 20 mg of Esomeprazole was measured by the electronic balance and placed in 100 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in methanol. Then the concentration of the solution was attained 200μg/ml by adding phosphate buffer (ph 6.8) up to 100 ml. Then 1 ml of solution was taken and diluted to 10 ml with phosphate buffer and absorbance was measured. To get more precise absorbance it was done at least two times. Preparation of assay solution: 10 tablets of each brand of Esomeprazole was weighed and powdered. 20 mg of Esomeprazole magnesium equivalent to Esomeprazole was weighed and dissolved in methanol and added phosphate buffer up to about 70 ml. Then the solution was sonicated about 15 minutes in the sonicator. After cooling the solution, phosphate buffer was added into the volumetric flask up to 100 ml and the solution was filtered. 1 ml of sample was taken in a test tube and made the volume 10 ml with phosphate buffer. Absorbance was measured at 300 nm using UV spectrophotometer. This was done at least 3 times for each brand of Esomeprazole. Calculation: Finally the assay was calculated by using the following equation. Assay of sample= Absorbance of sample Weight of standard Wt. Av DF Potency Absorbance of standard Weight of sample Where, DF = Dilution Factor Wt. Avg = Average Weight of sample. In-vitro Dissolution Studies In-vitro dissolution studies were carried out using dissolution USP apparatus # II. The dissolution medium was 900 ml of o.1n HCl and 900ml of phosphate buffer (ph 6.8), which was maintained at 37 ± 0.5 C and 75 RPM. In all dissolution experiments, 5 ml of dissolution samples were withdrawn and replaced with the equal volume fresh dissolution medium at regular intervals. Collected dissolution samples were used for determination of released Esomeprazole concentrations by using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer against a blank at 300 nm (Table 5). Results and discussion All the brand of Esomeprazole tablets used in this investigation was within their shelf life. All tablets obtained from local market were subjected to a number of tests in order to assess quality parameters like assay, weight variation, hardness, and disintegration time. All the tablets of different brand contained Esomeprazole within 100 ±5 % of the labeled claim. The USP [10] and IP [11] specifications for the assay are that the Esomeprazole content should be not less than 95 % and not more than 105 %. Therefore, the assay results ascertain the quality of Esomeprazole in all the products. Weight variation does serve as a pointer to good manufacturing practices (GMP) maintained by the manufacturers as well as the amount of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) contained in the formulation. The weight variation for all the tablets used in this study showed compliance within the official specifications [7, 12], as none of the products deviated by up to 5 % from their average weight. Weight Variation Test The weight variation test is a satisfactory method of determining the drug content uniformity of tablets. When the weight variation is within the specifications the tablets are thought to contain a uniform active ingredient to give desired therapeutic response. But when the weight variation is out of the specification the tablets are thought to contain less or more active ingredient to give an ineffective therapeutic response or toxic effect respectively. It may vary due to result from, poor granulation flow properties, resulting in uneven die fill. The USP 12 specification of weight variation: ±7.5 for 130 to 324mg average weight of tablet & ± 5% for more than 324mg of an average weight of the tablet. Twenty tablets were selected from each of the brands and weighed individually using electronic balance. Their average weights were calculated. For all tablet brands following mathematical equation was used for weight variation.

PhOL Sultana, et al. 4 (pag 1-9) [13] It was observed that all of the brands meet the USP specification. (Table 1) Hardness Test Hardness test of material is indicative of its strength. Most important physical feature for assessing tablet is hardness. [14] In this study, the hardness of different brands of Esomeprazole tablet was measured by hardness tester. The acceptable limit of hardness of a tablet is 4 to 7 kgf (kilogram of force). [15, 16] Besides, a force between 4 10 Kg is also considered to be satisfactory. [17] The hardness of five brands of Esomeprazole was determined and the observed results are shown in the table-2.the comparative Hardness of various brands of Esomeprazole tablets is graphically shown in Fig-1. Disintegration time Disintegration is the breakdown process of a tablet into smaller particles and is the first step towards dissolution.enteric coated are to point out no proof of disintegration once one hour in simulated stomach fluid and are to disintegrate in 2 hours and the time per the monograph within the intestinal fluid.to be compliance with USP standards, the tablets should disintegrate, and particle must pass through the three inches long glass tubes and held against a 10-mesh screen within the time given. [18] The onset of action of a dosage form of a drug depends on the time to be taken by the tablets to unharness the active ingredients into the succus. The tablets ought to be disintegrated within the acceptable time, otherwise, the prescribed course is affected and also the drug might not exert its effect properly. The disintegration time of five brands in phosphate buffer (ph 6.8) of Esomeprazole is shown in table-3. Before checking the disintegration in phosphate buffer (ph 6.8) they were treated with 0.1 N HCl for 2 hours but no disintegration occurs because of its enteric coating. The method specified in the USP/BP was used and the specification of disintegration time is 5 to 30 minutes. [10, 12] None of the samples exceeded the specification for disintegration time. Disintegration time of various brands of Esomeprazole tablet is shown in Fig- 2. Assay The assay results of all brands are between 95.28% and 99.40%. They meet the U.S.P specification for assay (Table 4). Dissolution test The dissolution rate of five brands of Esomeprazole tablets was determined. The observed results are shown in table-5.usp specification is not more than 10% in 0.1 N HCl after 2 hours (Table-5.1) and not less than 75% of the labeled amount of Esomeprazole to be dissolved after 45 minutes (Table-5.2). The five brands of Esomeprazole tablets meet the specifications. [19] All the brands meet the specification of the U.S.P standard as they did not release more than 10% drug in 0.1 N HCL after two hours treatment and release in cases of all brands more than 75% within 45 minutes in phosphate buffer (ph 6.8) Dissolution rate of various brands of Esomeprazole tablet is shown in Fig-3. Esomeprazole tablets have been analysed to find their correct quality status. For this purpose, the marketed sample of five brands of Esomeprazole tablets was analyzed by using established methods and apparatus. The result of weight variation, hardness, disintegration time, dissolution and assay potency tests of all marketed products comply with pharmacopoeial limit. All of the brands have proved that they have the quality which meets the BP and the USP specification. The present study, although performed on a limited scale yet on the basis of professional judgment the data reported in this study can help the Drug Control Authority to get an idea about the quality status of the marketed Esomeprazole preparations in Bangladesh. References 1. 1 Indian pharmacopoeia. 4th Ed.Delhi: Controller of Publications; 1996. p. 333-334. 2. Esomeprazole, Available fromhttps://www.drugs.com/cdi/esomeprazole.html. 3. WHO Quality assurance of pharmaceuticals: a compendium of guidelines and related materials. Good manufacturing practices and inspection. World Health Organization; 2007. 4. Anesary MA, Hossain MJ, Mamun MR et al. Pharmaceutical sector of Bangladesh: prospects and challenges. Available fromhttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/3220 5. Beximco Pharma starts exporting drugs to US market, Available fromhttp://www.newsbangladesh.com/english/details/167 67. 6. Yamato S, Sakai M, Shimada K., Quantitative analysis of chlorpheniramine maleate in cough and cold drugs by ion- pair high-performance liquid chromatography for the simultaneous determination of chlorpheniramine and maleate. Yakugaku zasshi.1996; 116(4):329-34. 7. Murtha JL, Julian TN, Radebaugh GW.Simultaneous determination of pseudoephedrine hydrochloride, chlorpheniramine maleate, and dextromethorphan hydrobromide by second-derivative photodiode array spectroscopy. J Pharm Sci. 1988; 77(8):715-8. 8. Khar RK. Lachman/liebermans: The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. Cbs Publishers & Distribu; 2013. 9. Kirchhoefer RD. Semautomated method for the analysis of chlorpheniramine maleate tablets:

PhOL Sultana, et al. 5 (pag 1-9) collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1979; 62(6):1197-201. 10. US Pharmacopeia National Formulary, USP 23/NF 18. Rockville, MD: United States Pharmacopeial Convention Inc.; 2000 p. 1882-1883. 11. Indian pharmacopoeia. Delhi: Controller of Publications; 1996. p. 190 12. British Pharmacopoeia. The Pharmaceutical Press. London: Her Majesty s Office; 1998 p. 1296. 13. Kalakuntla R, Veerlapati U, Chepuri M, Raparla R. Effect of various super disintegrants on hardness, disintegration and dissolution of drug from dosage form. J. Adv. Sci. Res. 2010; 1(1):15-9. 14. Karmakar P, Kibria MG. In-vitro comparative evaluation of quality control parameters between paracetamol and paracetamol/caffeine tablets available in Bangladesh. Int. curr. pharm. j. 2012; 1(5):103-9. 15. Musa H, Sule YZ, Gwarzo MS. Assessment of physicochemical properties of metronidazole tablets marketed in Zaria, Nigeria. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2011 Jun; 3(Suppl 3):27-9. 16. Karmakar P, Kibria MG. In-vitro comparative evaluation of quality control parameters between paracetamol and paracetamol/caffeine tablets available in Bangladesh. Int. curr. pharm. j. 2012; 1(5):103-9. 17. Bendari A, Al-Shehi B, Ahuja A. Comparison of pharmaceutical properties of different marked brands of metonidazole tables available in Oman. Int J Pharm Arc 2015; 4:2. 18. Gilbert S. Banker and Neil R. Anderson, Tablets. In L.Lachman, Herbert, Halieberman, Joseph L.Kaing, the Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy, 4th Edition, 1991, pp 804, 296-303,189. 19. United States Pharmacopeia XXIII and National Formulary XVII. Rand McNally, Taunton: United States Pharmacopeia Convention, Inc; 1995. p. 1950.

PhOL Sultana, et al. 6 (pag 1-9) Table 1: Weight Variation Test of Esomeprazole tablet Sample code Average weight per tablet (mg) SD E01 275.6 0.58 E02 270.7 0.25 E03 165.9 0.79 E04 279.7 1.79 E05 167.3 0.88 Table 2: Hardness of 5 brands of Esomeprazole tablets Name Hardness SD (kg/cm 2) E01 5.32 0.35 E02 6.71 0.88 E03 5.76 1.01 E04 6.26 0.21 E05 7.12 0.56 Table 3: Disintegration time of various brands of Esomeprazole tablets. Sample code Disintegration time(min) SD E01 29.05 1.05 E02 26.83 1.22 E03 19.93 2.15 E04 26.28 0.84 E05 28.18 1.63 Table 4: Potency of Esomeprazole Tablet Sample code Potency (%) SD E01 95.28 2.14 E02 98.45 1.25 E03 99.4 0.95 E04 98.63 1.44 E05 98.27 0.89

PhOL Sultana, et al. 7 (pag 1-9) Table 5: Dissolution Rate of Various Brands of Esomeprazole Tablets. Table 5.1: % of drug release after 2 hours in 0.1 N HCl Sample code % of drug release after 2 SD hours in 0.1 N HCl E01 2.55 0.56 E02 2.64 0.85 E03 3.88 0.48 E04 4.47 0.25 E05 2.94 0.66 Sample code Table 5.2: Dissolution in Phosphate buffer (ph 6.8) % of drug release after 10minutes 20 minutes 30 minutes 45 minutes 50 minutes 60 minutes E01 15.05 30.65 42.85 76.78 95.44 100.86 E02 11.86 14.06 54.09 76.5 95.30 102.37 E03 18.61 43.59 72.28 85.78 97.45 101.20 E04 13.27 17.44 53.86 81.25 94.36 105.89 E05 13.5 16.78 42.7 79.59 93.75 101.99 Figure 1: Hardness of various brands of Esomeprazole tablets

Disintegration time(min) PhOL Sultana, et al. 8 (pag 1-9) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 E01 E02 E03 E04 E05 Sample code Figure 2: Disintegration time of various brands of Esomeprazole tablet Figure 3: Standard curve of Esomeprazole

PhOL Santana, et al. 9 (pag 1-9) Figure 4: Dissolution rate of various brands of Esomeprazole tablet ISSN: 1820-8620