B. Required Codling Moth Damage Pre-Packing Fruit Evaluation: On-Tree Sequential Field Sampling Protocol:

Similar documents
SYSTEMS APPROACH WORK PLAN FOR THE EXPORTATION OF APPLES FROM THE UNITED STATES INTO TAIWAN

Systems Approach Work Plan for the Exportation of Apple from the US to Taiwan

Codling moth (CM) is becoming an increasing problem

Using pear ester to monitor codling moth in sex pheromone treated orchards

PHEROMONE-BASED CODLING MOTH AND NAVEL ORANGEWORM MANAGEMENT IN WALNUTS

Making codling moth mating disruption work in Michigan: Adopting an area-wide approach to managing codling moth in Michigan apple production

USING AEROSOL PHEROMONE PUFFERS FOR AREA-WIDE SUPPRESSION OF CODLING MOTH IN WALNUTS: YEAR FOUR

Putting Sterile Insect Technique into the Modern IPM Toolbox: Over 20 years of successful area-wide integrated pest management in Canadian pome fruit

Reduced rates of pheromone applications for control of codling moth (Cydia pomonella) in pear and walnut orchards

Pheromone Based Mating Disruption

Project Title: Evaluating use of sterile codling moth in apple IPM programs

Stephen Welter, Daniel Casado and Frances Cave, Rachel Elkins, Joe Grant, and Carolyn Pickel ABSTRACT

A Successful Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management (IPM)Program. 20 Years of Codling Moth Control

[Attachment] Survey guidelines for major fruit flies

CODLING MOTH & LEAFROLLER PHEROMONE MATING DISRUPTANT KEEP OUT OF THE REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION FIRST AID STATEMENT

MOTH. Codling. Codling moth (CM) is the "key" pest. THE increase in codling moth (CM) problems on a regional scale may be.

OKANAGAN-KOOTENAY STERILE INSECT RELEASE BOARD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Enhancing Biological Control to Stabilize Western Orchard IPM Systems

Determining Impact of Third Generation Codling Moth, and Emergence Pattern of Overwintered Moths

Annual report Dr Michelle Fountain Adrian Harris

CODLING MOTH CONTROL THROUGH MATING DISRUPTION

The (COSHH) Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations may apply to the use of this product at work.

Cydia pomonella. Do You Know? Hosts. Orchard IPM Series HG/Orchard/08 Codling Moth. by Diane G. Alston and Michael E. Reding Adult Codling Moth

USING AEROSOL PHEROMONE PUFFERS FOR AREA-WIDE SUPPRESSION OF CODLING MOTH IN WALNUTS: YEAR SIX

Apple Pest Management in the West: Strategies to Deal with Inevitable Change

Arkansas Fruit and Nut News Volume 5, Issue 6, 13 July 2015

Import Health Standard

FRUIT IPM UPDATE #11

How to Conduct On-Farm Trials. Dr. Jim Walworth Dept. of Soil, Water & Environmental Sci. University of Arizona

EVALUATION OF NEW AND EXISTING INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF WALNUT HUSK FLY 2012

PLUM CURCULIO: MANAGEMENT ASSUMPTIONS

I N S E C T S FIRST FLIGHT IN THIS ISSUE... F R U I T J O U R N A L May 7, 2012 VOLUME 21, No. 9 Geneva, NY

Codling Moth Management: Yesterday and Today

CITRUS WORK PLAN - CALIFORNIA. Work Plan For Citrus Exports from the State of California, United States of America to the People's Republic of China

Foothill Farm and Orchard News Issue #2 October, 2001

Why aren t more growers using codling moth mating disruption?

Improving codling moth spray timing. Adrian Harris. Philip Brain (Biometrician)

Efficacy of CpGV on Oriental Fruit Moth (Cydia molesta): myth or reality?

Control of Codling Moth and Other Pear Arthropods with Novaluron Evaluation of Novaluron for Phytotoxicity to Pear and Apple 2004

UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION

A Study of Codling Moth.Abundance As Influenced by Crop Failures

Contract Administrator : Carolyn Yager,

Project Title: Monitoring leafrollers and codling moth with one non-pheromone lure. PI: Alan Knight Co-PI: Jay Brunner

Irradiation Quarantine Treatments for Deciduous Tree Fruits

Late Broods of The C'odling Moth

Larval survival and development of the peach fruit moth, Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae), in picked and unpicked apple fruits

Hervé Quénin, Pierre Laur Calliope SAS Arysta Lifescience Corporation

ONGOING PROJECT REPORT YEAR 1/3 WTFRC Project # CH

ISPM No. 9 GUIDELINES FOR PEST ERADICATION PROGRAMMES (1998)

The suppression of the False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia leucotreta in South Africa using an AW-IPM approach with a SIT component

ISPM No. 28 PHYTOSANITARY TREATMENTS FOR REGULATED PESTS (2007)

Fruit) STRESS-INDUCED DISORDERS: EFFECTS ON APPLE FRUIT QUALITY

PEANUT KERNEL : MAXIMUM LEVEL OF AFLATOXIN

Volume 21, Number 10. June 4, Contents. Current degree day accumulations. Upcoming pest events. Current degree day accumulations

Economic Analysis of Codling Moth Control Alternatives in Apple Orchards

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

D. A. Goldhamer, R. Beede, S. Sibbett, D. Ramos, and F. Van Brocklin

Integrated Pest Management Successes

ISPM No. 30 ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) (2008)

Final Report of the. (HB 151, Chapter 17:1, Laws of 2018) October 16, Membership. Rep. Peter W. Bixby, Clerk Rep. Howard Pearl.

Mating disruption to control codling moth and torticid moths TF223 (Project lead, Rob Saville)

Attract and Kill: A New Management tool to control orchard pests?

TF223. Dr Robert Saville East Malling Research

R. A. Van Steenwyk,L. W. Barclay, W. W. Barnett, P. S. McNally, W. H. Olson, W. R. Schreader, G. S. Sibbett and C. V. Weakley

EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE PHEROMONE DISPENSING TECHNOLOGIES FOR CODLING MOTH

USING AEROSOL PHEROMONE PUFFERS FOR AREA-WIDE SUPPRESSION AND SPRAYABLE PHEROMONE IN MANAGEMENT OF CODLING MOTH IN WALNUTS

On the Radar August 26 th, 2016

Cydia pomonella Granulovirus Strain M

EVALUATION OF SWEET CHERRY FRUIT AND STEM DAMAGE WHEN APPLYING PEROXYACETIC ACID OR SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE AFTER HARVEST

AGRICULTURE DOCUMENTATION INVENTORY OF NON-TARIFF MEASURES

National Seed Health System

USDA Foods 101. Food Distribution Program

Keywords: Plum moth, mating disruption, Isomate OFM Rosso, entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN)

Saskatoon fruitinfesting

Pink Bollworm Control Act

NAPPO Regional Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (RSPM)

Olive Fruit Fly Management

How to keep apple fruit worm-free Celeste Welty, Extension Entomologist, Ohio State University January 2009

Management of Organophosphate Resistant Codling Moth

ASEAN Common Requirements of Pre-packaged Products

WASHINGTON STATE U NIVERSITY World Class. Face to Face. Pear psylla and mite management. New choices for 2004

Integrated Pest Management Successes

Please attach a sketch of proposed quarantine facility, including acreage or square feet.

DESCRIPTION: Control of Codling Moth in Organic Pear Orchards. PROJECT LEADER: Rachel Elkins, UCCE Lake County

Establishment of areas of low pest prevalence for fruit flies (Tephritidae)

DEVELOPMENT AND OPTIMIZATION OF MESO-PHEROMONE EMITTERS FOR CODLING MOTH MANAGEMENT IN WALNUTS AND PEARS

To open a CMA file > Download and Save file Start CMA Open file from within CMA

2010 Survey of Apple Orchard Owners/Managers: Summary Report

scaffolds I N S E C T S KNOWING WHERE TO LOOK IN THIS ISSUE... F R U I T J O U R N A L Update on Pest Management and Crop Development

The Changing Face of Agriculture: fruit flies, innovation and global trade

Learning with Rare Cases and Small Disjuncts

Guidelines for pest eradication programmes

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES GUIDELINES FOR PEST ERADICATION PROGRAMMES

ABSTRACT. Oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck), has been a primary pest of

The Challenges of Honeycrisp Storage: A PACKER S PERSPECTIVE

DEVELOPMENT OF SELECTIVE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR CODLING MOTH IN PEARS AND WALNUTS

EFFECT OF ESTEEM ON SAN JOSE SCALE

The use of the pheromone mating disruption method against fruit moths in private allotments

247 CMR BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY

Program Growth. Colorado s Industrial Hemp Program Update Aug 15,2017 National Plant Board Meeting. Year Registered Land Area Harvest

Transcription:

Summary of the Taiwan Protocol for Evaluating the Efficacy of Codling Moth Control Programs in Apple Orchards with Fruit for Export to Taiwan (2006 revised) A. Voluntary Initial Screening Guidelines: If cumulative trap catch in a single codling moth trap during the second and third CM generations meets or exceeds 30 moths per trap in a conventionally treated orchard or 20 moths per trap in a mating disrupted orchard, that orchard or that portion of the orchard should be considered high risk for export to Taiwan and carefully considered before committing the fruit to that market. Use large delta trap; 1 mg. lure in conventional orchards and 10 mg. lure in mating disrupted orchards; WSU suggests 1 trap per 5 acres (or grower practice); based on weekly monitoring. B. Required Codling Moth Damage Pre-Packing Fruit Evaluation: On-Tree Sequential Field Sampling Protocol: 1. The sequential sample should be started in the area with the highest CM trap catches or in area with known codling moth problems. Sampling personnel must review codling moth trap catch records for the block before beginning the sample. Samples should be collected on a regular grid throughout the area being sampled. Blocks chosen for sampling should be reasonably uniform in terms of cultivars, growing conditions, and codling moth management program. Any person competent to recognize codling moth damage in the field can do the sampling, however those without a pesticide consultants license must participate in a pre-season training session. 2. Trees should be selected randomly within the area, but separated by roughly 70 feet. 3. Each tree sample will consist of 60 half fruit per tree. 4. The trees should be sampled starting at the top of the tree. Count each fruit of which an entire half plus the calyx can be seen. Continue counting half-fruits from the top working down the tree until a total of 60 fruit are examined. 5. The number of trees to be sampled depends on the codling moth damage status of the orchard. A clean orchard may require sampling as few as 21 trees to complete the evaluation. A fruit with two live larvae is counted as only a single fruit infested. All suspect fruit should be cut to determine if the injury is the result of a successful larval entry or is only a sting (unsuccessful entry). Record only the successful entries as injury. 6. Sampling must be done within two weeks of the beginning of harvest in each variety in each grower lot. 7. The Taiwan codling moth field sampling form included in this packet must accompany the delivery of fruit or be on file in the packing facility for each grower lot to be exported to Taiwan. This form must be presented, along with the cull analysis records to the appropriate state commodity inspection officials at the time a requested phytosanitary inspection takes place. 8. If 0.2% or more of the fruit in the sample have live larvae present, the orchard is prohibited for export to Taiwan. 9. See the attached sequential sampling protocol document for more details. 1

10. If, following a 50 tree sample, no decision can be made to reject or accept the orchard block (detection of 4 to 7 live larvae after 50 trees) (see Taiwan codling moth field sampling form), the field sample can be repeated no sooner than 7 days from the date of the original sample to determine if the block can be accepted or rejected. If the second field sample is again inconclusive or results in the rejection of the block, that variety in that grower lot is rejected for export to Taiwan. Alternatively, the second sample in such blocks may be the bin sample. If the block fails the bin sample, that variety in that grower lot is rejected for export to Taiwan. If the lot passes the second sample all paperwork from both samples must be submitted to state department of agriculture officials to allow phytosanitary certification. -or- Bin sampling alternative. A minimum of 1500 fruit must be inspected per grower lot to look for larvae and insect damage. It is recommended that no more than 25 fruit be sampled randomly from each bin before the lot is submitted for packing for Taiwan. If the lot size is smaller than 60 bins more fruit can be sampled from each bin. Sampling can be done in the orchard or at the packing facility. All suspect fruit and a minimum of 150 fruit must be cut. If fruit without damage symptoms must be cut to meet the minimum fruit cut requirements, that fruit must be cut vertically from stem to calyx to increase the chances of detecting codling moth. Bins samples should represent fruit from all parts of the orchard. If more than 0.15% of the fruit in the sample have live larvae present (2 live larvae in 1500 fruit), the orchard is prohibited for export to Taiwan. A form to record the results of bin sampling is attached. Any person competent to recognize codling moth damage can do the sampling, however those without a pesticide consultants license must participate in a pre-season training session. Certified cull fruit cutters may also perform the bin sampling. 2

Background on the Binomial Sequential Sampling Plan for CM Orchard Evaluation Protocol: 1. The sequential sample will be started in the area with the highest CM trap catches. 2. Trees should be selected randomly within the area, but separated by roughly 70 feet. 3. Each tree sample will consist of 60 half fruit per tree. a. The trees should be sampled by looking at the top initially. Count each fruit of which an entire half plus the calyx can be seen. Continue counting half-fruits from the top working down the tree until a total of 60 fruit are examined. b. Movement around the tree is allowed as long as the same fruit are not sampled twice. If a total of 60-half fruit cannot be obtained from one tree due to small tree size, then continue sampling fruit on the adjacent tree. c. Record the total number of fruit with successful entries by codling moth on each tree. IMPORTANT a fruit with two live larvae is counted as only a single fruit infested! 4. It is highly recommended that an extendable pruning sampler be used to collect fruit that is suspected to have codling moth injury. The suspect fruit should be cut to determine if the injury is the result of a successful larval entry or is only a sting (unsuccessful entry). Record only the successful entries as injury. 5. Do not sample for codling moth injury in the middle of the day when the sun is high in the sky. a. The reflection of light of fruit and the intensity of light makes it difficult to observing codling moth injury. b. Sample so that you are not looking directly into the sun. c. Do not sample for more than 4 hours (continuous) at any one time. 6. Samples should not be concentrated on the edges of the block alone. Samples should be collected on a regular grid throughout the area being sampled, starting in the area with the highest CM trap catches. a. Blocks should be reasonably uniform in terms of cultivars, growing conditions, and codling moth management program. If they are not, each area needs to be sampled separately. Binomial Sequential Sample Background: A binomial sequential sample allows us to greatly reduce the number of samples needed when the population of codling moth is high or low compared to our target thresholds. Typically, these sequential sampling plans are a bit more complicated to explain, but are relatively simple to use and can reduce overall sampling effort by about 30-50%. The codling moth sequential sample detailed below is based on field data from 24 orchards and validated by use of 27 other orchards. Our analysis used the most conservative approach, which is to use the tenth percentile of the clumping parameter calculated from the 24 orchards (i.e., we used a very high estimate of clumping). We then used simulation studies with the 27 orchards to validate how accurate the sampling protocol would be and adjusted our error rates to achieve the best sampling program. The thresholds used are 0.2% as the upper threshold, which would eliminate the orchard from export (unless further sampling down the line were performed? Wasn t this what we said?), with a lower threshold of 0.04% (which would allow us to stop sampling and accept the orchard was ok for export). 3

How to use the Sampling Table: The sampling table has three columns with numbers and 2 blank columns: 1. The number of trees sampled (60 half fruit/tree) 2. The cumulative number of infested fruit that allows you to stop sampling if this number is exceeded then the upper threshold (0.2%) has been exceeded. 3. The cumulative number of infested fruit that would allow you to stop sampling if the number of infested fruit is less than this number then the damage is less than 0.04%. 4. The first blank column is the number of fruit infested with live larvae on that tree 5. The second blank column is the cumulative number of fruit infested with live larvae. 6. To use the table, you sample the first tree and put the number of fruit with live larvae present in the 4 th column. The fifth column is used to calculate the running sum (cumulative number) of fruit with live larvae present. 7. If the cumulative number of fruit with live larvae is greater than or equal to the second column, you stop sampling and reject the orchard from further consideration for export. 8. The third column is the number of fruit with live larvae that are allowed before you stop sampling. The cumulative number of fruit with live larvae must be less than or equal to this value to stop sampling. Notice that you must sample at least 21 trees before you can stop because the number of larvae is less than the value in the below column. Table 1. Sequential sample table to determine if the damage level is greater than or equal to 0.2% or less than or equal to 0.04% Stop if No. Fruit w/live Larvae is Tree Above or equal to Below or equal to 1 3 2 3 A 3 3 minimum 4 3 of 21 trees 5 3 must be 6 3 sampled 7 3 before 8 3 stopping in 9 4 orchards 10 4 with low 11 4 12 4 risk of 13 4 codling 14 4 moth 15 4 infestation. 16 4 17 4 18 4 19 5 20 5 21 5 0 22 5 0 23 5 0 24 5 0 25 5 0 26 5 0 27 5 0 28 6 0 29 6 0 30 6 0 31 6 1 32 6 1 33 6 1 34 6 1 35 6 1 36 6 1 37 6 1 38 7 1 39 7 1 40 7 1 41 7 2 42 7 2 43 7 2 44 7 2 45 7 2 46 7 2 47 7 2 48 8 2 49 8 2 50 8 3 No. Fruit w/live Larvae Cum no. 4

Questions About the Performance of the Binomial Sequential Sample: How many samples will be required? In general, the farther the orchard-wide percentage of fruit with live larvae is from the upper or lower threshold, the lower the sample size. This is particularly true if the orchard-wide percentage is above the upper threshold you can literally make the decision within just a few trees. For the case where the value is below the threshold value of 0.04%, you cannot stop sampling until at least 21 trees are sampled, so clean orchards are a bit harder to trigger the lower stopping point. The place where it is hardest to determine if you are above or below the threshold is if the orchard-wide percentage of fruit with live larvae is between 0.2% and 0.04%, and the sample size is highest in this area. Our data and simulation studies show that the highest average number of samples taken in this area is typically 34 trees, but it may be higher or lower than that based on chance alone. This seems complicated; why not use a fixed sample size? The sequential sample should result in 30-50% fewer samples being taken than using a fixed sample size of 50 trees per block. What is the chance that I ll miss a hot spot using this sampling system? On average, 5% of the time you will make a type I error (thought the orchard was higher than 0.2%, when it was lower) and 5% of the time will make a type II error (thought the orchard was lower than 0.04% when it was higher). In fact, we ve skewed these percentages to even lower numbers two ways. First, we re starting in the area with the highest trap catch. Second, we re using an estimate of population clumping that is so high only 10% of the orchards we ve surveyed exhibit that value. Both of these factors actually make our sample more sensitive and reduce the chance of a type I error where we get cut off from export because we have live larvae present. We are also sampling a long distance between the samples so we are covering a large part of the orchard. 5

Example Tables: The first table (Table 2) shows what would happen if the average percentage fruit with live larvae is 0.4%. The data were generated with a negative binomial random number generator. As you can see, with this block, only 9 trees needed to be sampled (60 x 9 = 540 fruit total) to reach a decision. In the next table (Table 3), the average percentage infested is 0.01% and we can t reach a decision until 21 trees (21 x 60 = 1260 fruit) have been sampled. The final example table (Table 4) shows when the full 50 tree sampling fails to reach a decision. The final count falls between 4 and 7 meaning that the infestation level fells between the cut off thresholds. In this case the orchard will require a follow-up sampling either by repeating the orchard sampling no sooner that 7 days, or by performing a bin sampling. Table 2. Example of sequential sample when the average percentage of fruit with live larvae is 0.4%. Stop if No. Fruit w/live Larvae is Example Data Tree Above Below No. Fruit w/live Larvae Cum no. Decision 1 3 0 0 continue 2 3 0 0 continue 3 3 0 0 continue 4 3 1 1 continue 5 3 0 1 continue 6 3 0 1 continue 7 3 0 1 continue 8 3 1 2 continue 9 3 1 3 reject high Reject Table 3. Example of sequential sample when the average percentage of fruit with live larvae is 0.01%. Stop if No. Fruit w/live Tree Above Below No. Fruit w/live Larvae Cum no. Decision 1 3 0 0 continue 2 3 0 0 continue 3 3 0 0 continue 4 3 0 0 continue 5 3 0 0 continue 6 3 0 0 continue 7 3 0 0 continue 8 3 0 0 continue 9 4 0 0 continue 10 4 0 0 continue 11 4 0 0 continue 12 4 0 0 continue 13 4 0 0 continue 14 4 0 0 continue 15 4 0 0 continue 16 4 0 0 continue 17 4 0 0 continue 18 4 0 0 continue 19 5 0 0 continue 20 5 0 0 continue 21 5 0 0 0 reject low Accept 6

Table 4. Example of sequential sampling when the average percentage of fruit with live larvae falls between 0.01% and 0.4%. This block will require a second sampling to make a final determination. If it occurs a sencond time, the lot is rejected. 7

Taiwan Export Program-Orchard Codling Moth Control Worksheet Sequential sampling table to determine if the fruit from a specific grower lot is eligible for export to Taiwan (i.e. damage level is greater than 0.2% or less than or equal to 0.04%) St op if No. Fruit w/live Larva e is: Above or Below or Tree equal to equal to 1 3 2 3 A 3 3 4 3 minimum 5 3 of 21 trees 6 3 7 3 must be 8 3 sampled 9 4 before 10 4 11 4 stopping in 12 4 orchards 13 4 14 4 with low 15 4 risk of 16 4 codling 17 4 18 4 moth 19 5 infestation. 20 5 21 5 0 22 5 0 23 5 0 24 5 0 25 5 0 26 5 0 27 5 0 28 6 0 29 6 0 30 6 0 31 6 1 32 6 1 33 6 1 34 6 1 35 6 1 36 6 1 37 6 1 38 7 1 39 7 1 40 7 1 41 7 2 42 7 2 43 7 2 44 7 2 45 7 2 46 7 2 47 7 2 48 8 2 49 8 2 50 8 3 No. Fruit w/live Larvae Cum. no. Grower/Orchard Name Variety/Grower Lot Number Sampled by Date This document must accompany the first load of fruit from this lot upon delivery to the packing facility. Lots that do not have documentation verifying low risk of codling moth presence are not eligible for export to Taiwan. If no decision is reached after sampling 50 trees, orchard may be resampled once in the field in no less than 7 days to verify infestation levels or once using the bin sample. If the lot does not pass following these resamples, the lot is disqualified for export to Taiwan.

Taiwan Apple Inspection Log Detection of Codling Moth During Bin Sampling Packer: Exporting Company: Producer Lot Number Variety Date Total # of bins # of bins sampled # of fruit sampled # of fruit cut Number of live larvae Identification Note: a minimum of 150 fruit must be cut per each grower lot Name of Technician Signature