THE ROLE OF STANDARD VIDEOCHROMOCOLONOSCOPY IN DISTINGUISHING ADENOMATOUS FROM NONADENOMATOUS DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS

Similar documents
Chromoendoscopy - Should It Be Standard of Care in IBD?

Chromoendoscopy as an Adjunct to Colonoscopy

Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 2006, 47(3):

How to characterize dysplastic lesions in IBD?

Chromoendoscopy or Narrow Band Imaging with Targeted biopsies Should be the Cancer Surveillance Endoscopy Procedure of Choice in Ulcerative Colitis

BENEFIT APPLICATION BLUE CARD/NATIONAL ACCOUNT ISSUES

High Resolution Colonoscopy With Chromoscopy Versus Standard Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colonic Neoplasia: A Randomized Study

The Effect of Indigocarmine on Improvement of the Polyp Detection Rate during Colonoscopic Examination with Hood Cap

Chromoendoscopy and Endomicroscopy for detecting colonic dysplasia

Corporate Medical Policy

Dysplasia 4/19/2017. How do I practice Chromoendoscopy for Surveillance of Colitis? SCENIC: Polypoid Dysplasia in UC. Background

Paris classification (2003) 삼성의료원내과이준행

Magnification endoscopy, high resolution endoscopy, and chromoscopy; towards a better optical diagnosis

Page 1. Is the Risk This High? Dysplasia in the IBD Patient. Dysplasia in the Non IBD Patient. Increased Risk of CRC in Ulcerative Colitis

Emerging Interventions in Endoscopy. Margaret Vance Nurse Consultant in Gastroenterology St Mark s Hospital

Advances in Endoscopic Imaging

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE

Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors

Vital staining and Barrett s esophagus

The Importance of Complete Colonoscopy and Exploration of the Cecal Region

Incidence and Management of Hemorrhage after Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Lesions

Supplementary Appendix

Surveying the Colon; Polyps and Advances in Polypectomy

removal of adenomatous polyps detects important effectively as follow-up colonoscopy after both constitute a low-risk Patients with 1 or 2

Prevalence and Characteristics of Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasm in an Asymptomatic and Average-Risk Chinese Population

Magnifying Endoscopy and Chromoendoscopy of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

Endoscopic Corner CASE 1. Kimtrakool S Aniwan S Linlawan S Muangpaisarn P Sallapant S Rerknimitr R

T he secondary prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC)

FEP Medical Policy Manual

ASGE and AGA Issue Consensus Statement on Surveillance and Management of Dysplasia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

I n 1925, Crohn and Rosenberg first observed that ulcerative

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches to Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Superficial Type

Risk of proximal colorectal neoplasia among asymptomatic patients with distal hyperplastic polyps

Description. Section: Medicine Effective Date: July 15, Subsection: Original Policy Date: September 13, 2012 Subject: Page: 1 of 17

Difficult Polypectomy 2015 Tool of the Trade

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a serious health problem

Predict, Resect and discard : Yes we can! (at least in some hands)

An Atlas of the Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasms in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Alberta Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (ACRCSP) Post Polypectomy Surveillance Guidelines

Colon Polyps: Detection, Inspection and Characteristics

In Vivo Colorectal Polyp Analysis Archived Medical Policy

Diagnostic accuracy of pit pattern and vascular pattern in colorectal lesions

Spartan Medical Research Journal

Endoscopic discrimination of sessile serrated adenomas from other serrated lesions

The addition of high magnifying endoscopy improves rates of high confidence optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps

Magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy for collagenous colitis

CASE DISCUSSION: The Patient with Dysplasia: Surgery or Active Surveillance? Noa Krugliak Cleveland, MD David T. Rubin, MD

COLON: Innovations 3 steps, 3 parts..

Billing Guideline. Subject: Colorectal Cancer Screening Exams (Invasive Procedures) Effective Date: 1/1/14 Last revision effective 4/16

The suction pseudopolyp technique: a novel method for the removal of small flat nonpolypoid lesions of the colon and rectum

Risk Factors for Incomplete Polyp Resection during Colonoscopic Polypectomy

Two-stage optical system for colorectal polyp assessments

Accuracy for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps in clinical practice

Screening & Surveillance Guidelines

Extended cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps increases the R0 resection rate

Colon Cancer Screening with Image-Enhanced Endoscopy

Size of colorectal polyps determines time taken to remove them endoscopically

The Paris classification of colonic lesions

Synchronous and Subsequent Lesions of Serrated Adenomas and Tubular Adenomas of the Colorectum

C olorectal adenomas are reputed to be precancerous

Chromoendoscopy is an image-enhanced endoscopic technique

Quality in Endoscopy: Can We Do Better?

Random biopsy is recommended in the US to detect

Molecular features of colorectal polyps presenting Kudo s type II mucosal crypt pattern: are they based on the same mechanism of tumorigenesis?

Management of pt1 polyps. Maria Pellise

The Usefulness Of Narrow Band Imaging Endoscopy For The Real Time Characterization Of Colonic Lesions

The Influence of Snare Size on the Utility and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy for the Removal of Colonic Polyps in Japanese Patients

Quality ID #343: Screening Colonoscopy Adenoma Detection Rate National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

비확대협대역대장내시경을이용한대장용종의감별진단

Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps in 2002 and 2012


Virtual Chromoendoscopy with I-Scan and its Application for Detection and Characterization of Colon Polyps

Colonic adenomas-a colonoscopy survey

Is there justification for levels of polyp competency? Dr Roland Valori Gloucestershire Hospitals United Kingdom

Quality indicators for colonoscopy and colonoscopist. Mirjana Kalauz Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb

New Approaches for Early Detection of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Associated Cancer and Surgical Treatment of UC Patients

Improving the quality of endoscopic polypectomy by introducing a colonoscopy quality assurance program

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related. Colonoscopic Miss Rates for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis

Endoscopy in IBD. F.Hartmann K.Kasper-Kliniken (St.Marienkrankenhaus) Frankfurt/M.

IN THE DEVELOPMENT and progression of colorectal

Videoendoscopy of Colonic Early Cancer

Title Description Type / Priority

A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practice amongst Israeli gastroenterologists

Linked color imaging improves the visibility of colorectal polyps: a video study

Review Article NBI and NBI Combined with Magnifying Colonoscopy

Summary. Cezary ŁozińskiABDF, Witold KyclerABCDEF. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2007; 12(4):

Helicobacter pylori Improved Detection of Helicobacter pylori

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Metachronous Esophageal Cancer and Colon Cancer Treated by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

CRC and Dysplasia in IBD: Objectives of Talk. Colorectal Cancer and Dysplasia in IBD: A Case-Based Approach. Page 1

When and How to use Chromoendoscopy in IBD

Quality of and compliance with colonoscopy in Lynch Syndrome surveillance: are we getting it right?

Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy

Determining the adenoma detection rate and adenomas per colonoscopy by photography alone: proof-of-concept study

Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with a novel endocytoscopic classification a pilot study

Feasibility of endoscopic mucosa-submucosa clip closure method (with video)

Colorectal Adenomas in the Lynch Syndromes. Results of a Colonoscopy Screening Program

Morphologic Criteria of Invasive Colonic Adenocarcinoma on Biopsy Specimens

Transcription:

Acta clin Croat 2001; 40:197-201 Professional Paper THE ROLE OF STANDARD VIDEOCHROMOCOLONOSCOPY IN DISTINGUISHING ADENOMATOUS FROM NONADENOMATOUS DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS Neven LjubiËiÊ, Milan KujundæiÊ, Marko BaniÊ and Goran RoiÊ Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia SUMMARY - To date, there are no reliable endoscopic criteria to discriminate a diminutive (<5 mm) colorectal adenomatous from nonadenomatous polyps. Studies have demonstrated the usefulness of high-resolution chromoendoscopy (high-resolution colonoscopy with topically applied indigo carmine dye) in discrimination of adenomatous from nonadenomatous colorectal polyps. However, the clinical utility of standard videocolonoscopy and chromoscopy with indigo carmine dye in differentiating diminutive colorectal polyps has not yet been completely defined. The aim of this study was to determine whether a combination of standard videocolonoscopy and staining with indigo carmine dye could differentiate between adenomatous and nonadenomatous colorectal polyps smaller than 5 mm. Colonoscopy by use of an Olympus EVIS 140 video system was performed in 42 patients in whom colorectal polyps smaller than 5 mm were found. Polyps were sprayed with up to 40 ml of 0.5% indigo carmine dye, and polypectomy was performed, and the material was referred for histology. In 42 patients included in the study, 48 polyps sized <5 mm were detected. Histologic analysis showed 14 of them to be adenomatous and 34 nonadenomatous polyps. Endoscopist s diagnosis was confirmed by histology in 12 of 14 (85.7%) adenomatous and 31 of 34 (91.2%) nonadenomatous colorectal diminutive polyps. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of standard videochromocolonoscopy in distinguishing between adenomatous and nonadenomatous polyps sized <5 mm were 85.7%, 91.2%, 80% and 93.9%, respectively. The likelihood ratios (LR) were 0.157 (LR-) and 9.74 (LR+). In conclusion, standard videocolonoscopy combined with indigo carmine dye is a reliable method to differentiate adenomatous from nonadenomatous colorectal polyps sized <5 mm. Such a technique could limit the requests for unnecessary biopsies and repeat colonoscopy, thus significantly reducing the cost of colorectal cancer screening. Key words: Colonic neoplasms, diagnosis; Colonic polyps, diagnosis; Adenoma, diagnosis; Colonoscopy, methods Introduction To date, there are no reliable endoscopic criteria to discriminate between diminutive (usually less than 5 mm) colorectal adenomatous polyps and nonadenomatous polyps. Studies have pointed to the clinical usefulness of Correspondence to: Neven LjubiËiÊ, M.D., Ph.D., FACG, Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital, Vinogradska c. 29, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia Received July 10, 2001, accepted August 16, 2001 high-resolution chromoendoscopy, i.e. colonoscopy with topically applied agents, in an attempt to discriminate neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps 1-3. Using both specially designed videocolonoscopes that produce high-resolution images at great magnification and indigo carmine dye, a contrast stain which accentuates epithelial topography, thus allowing recognition of otherwise unnoticeable epithelial changes, it seems possible to distinguish adenomatous from nonadenomatous colorectal polyps measuring <10 mm 3. The clinical utility of standard videocolonoscopy and staining with indigo 197

carmine dye, especially in the diagnosis of very small colorectal polyps sized <5 mm, has not yet been fully defined. According to the experience of George et al. 4, published in an abstract form, standard videocolonoscopy combined with 0.2% indigo carmine dye predicted polyp histology in a small number of cases with only 45% accuracy. On the other hand, results of two studies conducted in the USA 5,6, also recently published in the form of abstracts, showed standard videocolonoscopy and chromoscopy with indigo carmine dye to have acceptable sensitivity and specificity in differentiation between adenomatous and nonadenomatous polyps. To our knowledge, there are no European experiences related to chromoendoscopy and diminutive colorectal polyps that have been published in the form of in extenso articles. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether a combination of standard videocolonoscopy and chromoscopy with indigo carmine dye could differentiate adenomatous from nonadenomatous diminutive colorectal polyps. Patients and Methods Between October 1998 and October 1999, colonoscopy was performed in 42 patients in whom diminutive (<5 mm) colorectal polyps were detected. Polyps measuring >5 mm were excluded from analysis. An informed consent in writing was obtained from all patients before entering the study. All colonoscopies were performed with an Olympus EVIS 140 videocolonoscope system. Cecum was reached in all patients. None of the study patients had a personal history of colorectal malignancy or obvious signs of cancer on colonoscopic examination. The indications for colonoscopy included polyp(s) follow-up (n=14), family history of colon cancer (n=19), and anemia (n=9). The size of diminutive polyps was measured by the open forceps technique. Once the polyp was within sight, a spraying catheter (PW-5L-1, Olympus Corp., Japan) was used, which considerably facilitated the application of indigo carmine dye 7. A 5% solution of indigo carmine dye was sprayed directly onto the colonic mucosa in a volume of up to 60 ml. A mean indigo carmine dye staining of 36 ml (range 20-60 ml) was used. The endoscopy procedure was prolonged by 7 (3-11) minutes on an average with indigo carmine dye staining. Each polyp was recorded on a videtape and removed by snare polypectomy. All diminutive polyps were referred for histologic analysis, and the pathologist was blinded for endoscopic finding. Results In 42 patients included in the study, 48 diminutive (<5 mm) colorectal polyps were found. There were 19 men and 23 women, median age 59.8 (range 38-81) years. In all patients, indigo carmine dye spraying allowed for successful polyp assessment, followed by snare polypectomy. Table 1 shows distribution and histology of all 48 diminutive colorectal polyps detected. Histology findings revealed 14 adenomatous and 34 nonadenomatous polyps; in 11 cases, neither adenomatous nor hyperplastic histologic features were seen on histology. These included 7 inflammatory polyps, one lymphoid aggregate, and 3 specimens with normal mucosa. Hyperplastic polyps were most often seen in the rectum and sigmoid, whereas adenomatous polyps were more commonly observed in the right colon. Mild dysplasia was found in two (14.3%) diminutive adenomatous polyps. Table 1. Histology and distribution of diminutive (<5 mm) colorectal polyps (N=48) Localization Adenomatous Hyperplastic Other n n n Rectum 3 11 2 a,b Sigmoid 2 7 2 a,c Descending colon 1 4 Transverse colon 1 c Ascending colon 3 1 1 a Cecum 5 5 a,b,c a inflammatory colorectal polyp; b lymphoid aggregate; c normal mucosa The application of an indigo carmine dye forms a coating over the surface of the colonic mucosa, thereby highlighting mucosal topography. Therefore, detailed morphological characteristics of the polyps were only seen upon the application of indigo carmine dye. In contrast to nonadenomatous polyps, where indigo carmine staining revealed a typical pitted appearance morphologically similar to the surrounding mucosa (Fig. 1), adenomatous polyps had a characteristic folded appearance (Fig. 2). The histology was correctly predicted by the endoscopist in 12 of 14 (85.7%) adenomatous, and 31 of 34 (91.2%) nonadenomatous diminutive colorectal polyps (Table 2). Two adenomatous polyps were predicted to be nonadenomatous, and 3 were predicted to be adenomatous (2 inflammatory polyps and one lymphoid aggre- 198 Acta clin Croat, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2001

Fig. 1. Upon indigo carmine dye application, an orderly arrangement of surface pits (so-called dots) was observed, suggesting the presence of nonadenomatous polyp. Histology revealed a hyperplastic polyp. gate). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of standard videochromocolonoscopy in distinguishing adenomatous from nonadenomatous polyps were 85.7%, 91.2%, 80% and 93.9%, respectively. The likelihood ratios (LR) were 0.157 (LR-) and 9.74 (LR+). Table 2. Actual and predicted histology of diminutive (<5 mm) colorectal polyps (N=48) Actual histology Endoscopist s prediction Adenomatous Nonadenomatous Adenomatous (n=14) 12 2 Nonadenomatous (n=34) 3 31 Specificity 91.2%; sensitivity 85.7%; positive predictive value 80%; negative predictive value 93.9%; likelihood ratio (LR): LR+ 9.74; LR- 0.157 Discussion Despite the fact that histology remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of colorectal polyps, recent investigations have shown that high-magnification chromocolonoscopy with indigo carmine dye could be a reliable method in discrimination of adenomatous from nonadenomatous polyps 2,3. However, there is a great amount of Fig. 2. Upon indigo carmine dye application, the presence of sulcuslike grooves and absence of surface pits were observed, suggesting the presence of adenomatous polyp. Histology revealed an adenomatous polyp. conflicting data concerning the usefulness of standard videocolonoscopy and chromoscopy with indigo carmine dye. Recent, predominantly U.S. trials published in the form of abstracts report on conflicting results 4-6. In a study from Cleveland, in which 0.2% indigo carmine dye was sprayed onto the surface of polyps, it was not possible to reliably differentiate adenomatous from nonadenomatous polyps 4. Encouraging results have come from two recent trials. Investigators from Georgetown University used 0.4% indigo carmine dye and achieved 96% sensitivity and 81% specificity for adenomatous polyps 5. This study led to a multicenter U.S. study, in which investigators evaluated 513 polyps with a mean diameter of 4 to 7 mm 6. In attempts to distinguish adenomatous from nonadenomatous polyps, the use of videocolonoscopy with indigo carmine dye has yielded a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 82%, with a negative predictive value of 88%. The results of this study and our data appear to be quite close to those obtained in the studies in which high-resolution videoendoscopes were used 3. It seems, therefore, that in case of diminutive colorectal polyps there is no need to use sophisticated equipment for chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye. It has been proposed that, like most endoscopic procedures, there must be a learning curve involved 8. Namely, despite the fact that technical difficulties of tissue staining are minimal and usually prolong the length of endoscopic procedure by 7 minutes at the most, the interpretation of findings is a matter of due experience in the field. Also, it is very important that all colorectal mucosa surrounding the polyp as well as the entire polyp are completely covered with a sufficient amount of indigo Acta clin Croat, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2001 199

carmine dye applied as a solution at appropriate concentration, preferably 0.4% or even more. A large volume of recent data show that 40% to 60% of diminutive colorectal polyps are neoplastic 9-11. Even more disconcerting are reports on small, flat or nonpolypoid adenomas that have a relatively high incidence of moderate to severe dysplasia 12-14. However, there is a debate about whether these small flat lesions have global implications. Large studies in the U.S. failed to reveal high-grade dysplastic lesions anywhere at a frequency close to that in Japanese studies 15. On the other hand, a study performed in Sweden by Jaramillo et al. 14 demonstrated a similar prevalence of flat adenomas to that described in the Japanese literature. Thus, the issue is unsolved. In spite of the fact that this study was limited to a small number of patients, it is very interesting that approximately 30% of diminutive polyps sized less than 5 mm were found to be adenomatous, and that mild dysplasia was observed in 14% of cases. Therefore, when even a small mucosal abnormality is suspected on routine colonoscopy, indigo carmine dye should be sprayed onto the surface to help detect such lesions. Many endoscopists would argue that the technique is of limited utility unless having a 100% accuracy, as otherwise some diminutive adenomas may be missed. A counterargument would be that follow-up strategies could be developed to observe the patients suspect to have hyperplastic polyps less frequently than those with no polyps at all, but less extensively than those with adenomatous polyps. Such a strategy would be more costeffective and important reduction could be anticipated in the cost of colon cancer screening. In conclusion, the present study confirmed that standard videochromocolonoscopy with indigo carmine dye is a reliable method in differentiating adenomatous from nonadenomatous diminutive colorectal polyps. Particularly if the feasibility and effectiveness of once-in-a-lifetime screening to reduce the mortality from colorectal cancer be accepted, chromocolonoscopy would be a valuable tool for screening examinations and would lead to substantial cost savings by avoiding the need for unnecessary biopsies and/or unnecessary repeat colonoscopies. observed by magnifying colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:93. 3. AXELRAD AM, FLEISCHER DE, GELLER AJ, NGUYEN CC, LEWIS JH, AL-KAWAS FH, AVIGAN MI, MONT- GOMERY EA, BENJAMIN SB. High-resolution chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of diminutive colon polyps: implications for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1253-8. 4. GEORGE LL, VAN STOLK RU, BRZEZINSKY A, SEIDNER DL. Evaluation of indigo carmine dye spray as a diagnostic tool in assessing diminutive polyps found at screening sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:93. 5. FRY S, FLEISCHER DE, AXELRAD AM et al. High-resolution chromoendoscopy: an affordable and accurate non-biopsy technique for predicting histology of colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:365. 6. KIM CY, FLEISCHER DE, KOZAREK R. High-resolution colonoscopy and chromoendoscopy for classifying colonic polyps: final results of a multicenter study. Gastroenterology 1999;114: A622. 7. KIM CY, FLEISCHER DE. Colonic chromoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1997;7:423-37. 8. FENNERTY MB. Should chromoscopy be part of the proficient endoscopist s armamentarium? Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:313-5. 9. BLUE MG, SIVAK MV, ACHKAR E, MATZEN R, STAHL RS. Hyperplastic polyps seen at sigmoidoscopy are markers for additional adenomas seen at colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1991; 100:564-6. 10. OPELKA FG, TIMMCKE AE, GATHRIGHT JB, RAY JE, HICKS TC. Diminutive colonic polyps: an indication for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:178-81. 11. TAPPERO G, GAIA E, DeGIULI P, MARTINI S, GUBETTA L, EMANUELLI G. Cold snare excision of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38:310-3. 12. MUTO T, KAMIYA J, SAWAD T, KONISHI F, SUGIHARA K, KUBOTA Y, ADACHI M, AGAWA S, SAITO Y, MO- RIOKA Y. Small, flat adenoma of the large bowel with special reference to its clinicopathologic features. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:847-51. 13. MATSUMOTO T, IIDA M, KUWANO Y, TADA S, YAO T, FUJISHIMA M. Minute non-polypoid adenoma of the colon detected by colonoscopy: correlation between endoscopic and histologic findings. Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38:645-50. 14. JARAMILLO E, WATANABE M, BEFRITS R, PONCE de LEON E, RUBIO C, SLEZAK P. Small, flat colorectal neoplasia in long standing ulcerative colitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:15-22. 15. BOND JM. Small flat adenomas have little clinical importance in western countries. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:184-7. References 1. BOND JH. Is the small colorectal polyp clinically diminutive? Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:592-3. 2. MITOOKA H, SHIRAKAWA K, NAKA Y, MAKINO S, FUJIMORO T, MAEDA S. Differentiation of diminutive neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps by the pit patterns (PP) 200 Acta clin Croat, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2001

Saæetak ULOGA STANDARDNE VIDEO-KROMOKOLONOSKOPIJE U RAZLIKOVANJU ADENOMATOZNIH OD NEADENOMATOZNIH SITNIH KOLOREKTALNIH POLIPA N. LjubiËiÊ, M. KujundæiÊ, M. BaniÊ i G. RoiÊ Danas ne postoje pouzdani endoskopski kriteriji koji bi razlikovali sitne (<5 mm) kolorektalne adenomatozne od neadenomatoznih polipa. Ranije su studije pokazale korisnu uporabu visoko-rezolucijske kromoendoskopije (visoko-rezolucijska kolonoskopija s topiëkom primjenom indigo crvene boje) u razlikovanju adenomatoznih od neadenomatoznih kolorektalnih polipa. Ipak, kliniëka upotreba standardne video-kolonoskopije i kromoskopije s indigo crvenom bojom u razlikovanju sitnih kolorektalnih polipa nije joπ potpuno utvrappleena. Namjera ovoga ispitivanja bila je utvrditi moæe li se kombinacijom standardne video-kolonoskopije i bojanja indigo crvenom bojom razlikovati adenomatozne od neadenomatoznih kolorektalnih polipa manjih od 5 mm. Kolonoskopija uz primjenu video sustava Olympus EVIS 140 izvedena je u 42 bolesnika u kojih su naappleeni kolorektalni polipi manji od 5 mm. Polipi su poprskani 0,5%-tnom indigo crvenom bojom u koliëini do 40 ml, izvedena je polipektomija i provedena histoloπka analiza. U 42 bolesnika ukljuëenih u ispitivanje naappleeno je 48 polipa manjih od 5 mm. Histoloπka analiza pokazala je postojanje 14 adenomatoznih i 34 neadenomatoznih polipa. Endoskopist je ispravno predvidio histoloπki nalaz u 12 od 14 (85,7%) adenomatoznih, te u 31 od 34 (91,2%) neadenomatoznih kolorektalnih sitnih polipa. Osjetljivost, specifiënost, pozitivna prediktivna vrijednost i negativna prediktivna vrijednost standardne video-kromokolonoskopije u razlikovanju adenomatoznih od neadenomatoznih polipa manjih od 5 mm bile su 85,7%, 91,2%, 80%, odnosno 93,9%. Omjer vjerojatnosti (LR) iznosio je 0,157 (LR-) i 9,74 (LR+). Standardna video-kolonoskopija u kombinaciji s indigo crvenom bojom pouzdana je metoda za ralikovanje adenomatoznih od neadenomatoznih kolorektalnih polipa manjih od 5 mm. Ovakvom bi se tehnikom mogli smanjiti zahtjevi za nepotrebnim biopsijama i opetovanim kolonoskopijama, te tako znaëajno sniziti troπkovi probiranja na kolorektalni karcinom. KljuËne rijeëi: Neoplazme kolona, dijagnostika; Polipi kolona, dijagnostika; Adenom, dijagnostika; Kolonoskopija, metode Acta clin Croat, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2001 201