Epidemiological Evidence for Radiation-induced induced Circulatory Diseases Non-occupational occupational Exposure

Similar documents
Long-term Epidemiological Studies on Radiation Effects in A-bomb Survivors

Risk Models for Radiationinduced

Epidemiological Studies on the Atomic-bomb Survivors (Handout)

The Latest Update on Atomic-Bomb Survivor Studies

Epidemiologic Studies. The Carcinogenic Effects of Radiation: Experience from Recent Epidemiologic Studies. Types of Epidemiologic Studies

RADIATION PROTECTION NO 158

BEIR VII: Epidemiology and Models for Estimating Cancer Risk

Implications for Radiation Protection

The Epidemiology of Leukaemia and other Cancers in Childhood after Exposure to Ionising Radiation

Radiation Health Effects

Cancer Risks Following Low Dose Radiation Exposures: Lessons from Epi Studies

The Cohort of the Atomic Bomb Survivors - Major Basis of Radiation Safety Regulations

Leukemia: Lessons from the Japanese Experience

The Linear No-Threshold Model (LNT): Made to Be Tested, Made to Be Questioned. Richard C. Miller, PhD Associate Professor The University of Chicago

Epidemiologic Data on Low-Dose Cancer Risk

From Epidemiology to Risk Factors aka DDREF: Light and Shadows

Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture

Effects of Radiation and Lifestyle Factors on Risks of Urothelial Carcinoma in the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors

Epidemiologic Survey of Radiation Health Effects - Survey of Health Effects of Atomic Bomb Radiation -

DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL STUDIES Departmental Overview Page 1 The Department of Clinical Studies conducts health-examination programs of the Adult Healt

Joint RERF-ICRP Workshop on Health Risk of Radiation and the System of Radiological Protection Tokyo, Japan, 09 Oct 2016

IJC International Journal of Cancer

Timing of Menarche and First Birth in Relation to Risk of Breast Cancer in A-Bomb Survivors

Epidemiologic Studies of Radiation Cataract Risk

Fig Distribution of regional centers of the Registry across the territory of Russia.

RADIATION DOSE ASSOCIATED WITH RENAL FAILURE MORTALITY 221

STUDIES OF LOW-DOSE RADIATION AND CANCER. E. Lubin

Atomic Bomb and Leukemia ICHIMARU M., TOMONAGA M., AMENOMORI T. AND MATSUO T.

Threshold doses and circulatory disease risks

Thyroid Cancer after Exposure to External Radiation: A Pooled Analysis of Seven Studies

For IACRS. May 13, Geneva. Christopher Clement ICRP Scientific Secretary

Incidence of Benign Gastrointestinal Tumors among Atomic Bomb Survivors

7/22/2014. Radiation Induced Cancer: Mechanisms. Challenges Identifying Radiogenic Cancers at Low Dose & Low Dose Rate (<100 mgy & <5 10 mgy/h)

Cardiovascular diseases related to ionizing radiation: The risk of low-dose exposure (Review)

Potential worker and public health impacts from the Fukushima accident

Estimating Risk of Low Radiation Doses (from AAPM 2013) María Marteinsdóttir Nordic Trauma,

Epidemiology of the Atomic Bomb Survivors and Chernobyl to Fukushima Accidents Toshiko Kato

Understanding radiation-induced cancer risks at radiological doses

Threshold doses and circulatory disease risks

Core Concepts in Radiation Exposure 4/10/2015. Ionizing Radiation, Cancer, and. James Seward, MD MPP

A Review of Forty-Five Years Study of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Survivors

Cardiovascular Outcome

Solid Cancer Incidence among the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors:

Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario. Other Radiation

Baldness and Coronary Heart Disease Rates in Men from the Framingham Study

RADIATION-EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF GROUP OF DIFFERENT DISEASES OF CIRCULATORY SYSTEM AND CONCOMITANT DISEASES AMONG CHERNOBYL LIQUIDATORS

Table 2.8. Cohort studies of exposure to radium-224, 226 or 228 and their decay products

Chapter 2 ABOUT ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL RISK IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY USING AN EXAMPLE OF THE LENINGRAD NPP

Cancer risks following low-dose radiation from CT scans in childhood. John Mathews CSRP 2016

Radiation Effects Research Foundation Life Span Study Solid Cancer Incidence Data Set (all solid cancers) March 2017

ESTIMATING RADIOGENIC CANCER RISKS

Are Atomic-Bomb Dose-Response Data from ABCC/RERF Reasonable for Assessment of Radiation Risk?

Laurier D. GT CIPR, Paris, 29 Nov This presentation has neither been approved nor endorsed by the Main Commission of ICRP

LOW DOSE IONIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE MORTALITY: COHORT STUDY BASED ON CANADIAN NATIONAL DOSE REGISTRY OF RADIATION WORKERS

Where does the estimate of 29,000 cancers come from? Based on Table 12D from BEIR VII, + risk estimates for 56,900,000 patients

June 2013 Hiroshima International Council for Health Care of the Radiation-exposed (HICARE) President /Toshiteru Okubo M.D., Ph.D.

Radiation doses and cancer incidence (excluding thyroid cancer) due to the Chernobyl accident

Report of Major Activities

Health effects of radiation (acute and late effects)

A risk assessment of the potential impacts of radon, terrestrial gamma and cosmic rays on childhood leukaemia in France

Sources of Data of Stochastic Effects of Radiation. Michael K O Connor, Ph.D. Dept. of Radiology, Mayo Clinic

Table 2.1. Cohort Studies of HCV and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

LINEAR VERSUS NON-LINEAR: A PERSPECTIVE FROM HEALTH PHYSICS AND RADIOBIOLOGY

Lung, Laryngeal and Other Respiratory Cancer Incidence among Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors: An Updated Analysis from 1958 through 2009

CONTENTS NOTE TO THE READER...1 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS...3

Implications of Recent Epidemiologic Studies for the Linear Nonthreshold Model and Radiation Protection

RERF s Views on Residual Radiation 8 December 2012 Radiation Effects Research Foundation. Introduction

RAMPS-GNYCHPS 2010 Spring Symposium New York, NY, April 30, Error Prevention and Patient Safety for Radiation Treatment and Diagnosis

Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Radiation. Tim Marshel R.T. (R)(N)(CT)(MR)(NCT)(PET)(CNMT)

Radiation Epidemiology: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Human Risk Assessment Radiation Epidemiology

Third International Symposium on the System of Radiological Protection Seoul, Korea October 22, Werner Rühm Helmholtz Center Munich, Germany

JRPR. A Comparative Review of Radiation-induced Cancer Risk Models. Technical Paper. Introduction

Ernest Rutherford:

A Framework for Estimating Radiation-Related Cancer Risks in Japan from the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Accident

Learning Objectives 9/9/2013. Hypothesis Testing. Conflicts of Interest. Descriptive statistics: Numerical methods Measures of Central Tendency

9/4/2013. Decision Errors. Hypothesis Testing. Conflicts of Interest. Descriptive statistics: Numerical methods Measures of Central Tendency

Second primary cancers in adults after radiotherapy an epidemiological review

A Review of Forty-Five Years Study of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Survivors SEYMOUR ABRAHAMSON

Is a Linear Extrapolation of Cancer Risks to Very Low Doses Justified?

Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons Oslo, Norway, March 4-5, 2013 Working Session I Immediate Humanitarian impact of a nuclear weapon detonation

Issues to Discuss 2/28/2018. The Adverse Effects of Occupational and Environmental Ionizing Radiation: James Seward, MD MPP. Past, Present, and Future

Title 50 Years-Long Term Follow Up Study. Citation Acta medica Nagasakiensia. 1997, 42

Epidemiologic Measure of Association

High concentrations of arsenic in drinking water result in the highest known increases in mortality attributable to any environmental exposure

ASSESSMENT OF CHERNOBYL MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Dose-equivalent equivalent = absorbed

Leukaemia Among Uranium Miners Late Effects of Exposure to Uranium Dust. L. Tomášek 1, A. Heribanová 2

Advanced IPD meta-analysis methods for observational studies

SOLO: Radiation Risk Research in the Southern Urals

1. The Accident of Chernobyl Unit 4 of 1,000 MWe Graphite-Moderated Boiling Water Pressure Tube Reactor in 1986

High Incidence of Meningioma among Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Survivors

Estimating Testicular Cancer specific Mortality by Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Registry

DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION: DO NOT REFERENCE. Annals of the ICRP ICRP PUBLICATION 1XX

JAMA. 2006;295:

Long-term health hazards from diagnostic X-ray exposure

The decline in mortality rates from total stroke in Japan

Estimates of Risks LONG-TERM LOW DOSE EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION

Yes I Can Site Report: The Radiation Effects Research Foundation in Hiroshima Report by Shari Yasin, McMaster University

Transcription:

Epidemiological Evidence for Radiation-induced induced Circulatory Diseases Non-occupational occupational Exposure Richard Wakeford Dalton Nuclear Institute, The University of Manchester, UK and Mark P Little Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College School of Medicine, UK

Objective of Presentation We shall explore the evolving evidence for a radiation-associated excess risk of diseases of the blood circulatory system (heart disease, stroke, etc.) among the Japanese survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945.

Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors The cohort study of the Japanese survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki represents the Gold Standard for radiation epidemiology. It is upon the experience of these Japanese survivors that the radiation risk estimates underlying radiological protection are primarily (but not solely) based.

Life Span Study (LSS) Follow-up of ~87 000 survivors, ~48 000 of whom were non-trivially exposed. Started in October 1950, still underway. Includes both sexes and all ages; healthy individuals in a general population. Mortality and cancer incidence investigated. Effectively complete cancer ascertainment. Wide range of doses received; detailed organ dose estimates.

Life Span Study (LSS) Acute, high dose-rate exposure. Malnourished Japanese population; low proportion of men of military age. Some (retrospective) dose estimates uncertain; predominantly external γ doses. Healthy survivor effect. Almost half of the survivors still alive. Data prior to October 1950 missing.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki The Japanese atomic bomb survivors do not provide evidence for a marked deviation from a linear no-threshold (LNT) dose-response relationship for the excess relative risk of solid cancer incidence.

Solid Cancer Incidence among Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors (1958-1998) (Preston et al., Radiat Res 2007; 168: 1-64)

Adult Health Study (AHS) Established in 1958. Subset of Life Span Study. ~20 000 study subjects. Biennial health examinations. 10 339 study subjects with DS86 doses. AHS allows disease morbidity to be investigated for a range of diseases.

Initial Evidence (1950-1970) (Jablon & Kato, Radiat Res 1972; 50: 649-98)

Non-cancer Mortality (1950-1978) (Kato et al. Radiat Res 1982; 91: 243-64) Variation of mortality from diseases of the circulatory system with dose is unremarkable, and no mention is made of the risk in subgroups.

Circulatory Disease Incidence (Robertson et al. RERF TR 12-79 1979 Kodama et al. RERF TR 22-84 1984) During 1958-1978 the incidence of myocardial infarction increased with radiation dose for Hiroshima females. A similar effect was not found for Hiroshima males or Nagasaki survivors. Finding for Hiroshima female survivors considered tentative.

Non-cancer Mortality (1950-85) (Shimizu et al. Radiat Res 1992; 130: 249-66)

Circulatory Disease Mortality (Shimizu et al. Radiat Res 1992; 130: 249-66) Age ATB <40, 1966-85 Age ATB 40+, 1950-65

Cause of Death Misclassification (Sposto et al. Biometrics 1992; 48: 605-17) Increase in non-cancer mortality due to death certificate misclassification? Autopsy study finds 22% of non-cancer deaths misclassified as cancer deaths. Statistical adjustment reduces the ERR/Gy for non-cancer mortality from 0.06 to 0.05, but the risk coefficient remains statistically significant.

Circulatory Disease Incidence (Wong et al. Radiat Res 1993; 135: 418-30)

Circulatory Disease Incidence (Wong et al. Radiat Res 1993; 135: 418-30) For those <40 years of age ATB, the relative risk of myocardial infarction was deaths during 1964-1986 1.40 (95% CI: 1.00, 2.30) Gy -1 deaths during 1968-1986 1.57 (95% CI: 1.26, 2.76) Gy -1 No effect in those 40+ years of age ATB

Circulatory Disease Incidence (Wong et al. Radiat Res 1993; 135: 418-30)

Circulatory Disease The two [LSS mortality and AHS incidence] results together indicate that both the fatal and the nonfatal forms of coronary heart disease are possible consequences of exposure to a high level of ionizing radiation. [our emphasis] Wong et al. Radiat Res 1993; 135: 418-30

Non-cancer Mortality (1950-1990) (Shimizu et al. Radiat Res 1999; 152: 374-89)

Non-cancer Mortality (1966-1990) (Shimizu et al. Radiat Res 1999; 152: 374-89)

Possible Confounding (Shimizu et al. Radiat Res 1999; 152: 374-89) Confounding is less likely to be an explanation for the statistical association when small areas are considered. Proximal survivors are those <3 km from the hypocentres (~60 000 survivors). Non-cancer mortality ERR/Sv is raised to a statistically significant extent for proximal survivors (and also for ~3000 survivors between 0.9 and 1.2 km from hypocentres).

Circulatory Disease Mortality (1950-90) (Shimizu et al. Radiat Res 1999; 152: 374-89) Variation of ERR in dose range 0-3 Sv

Potential Confounding Factors (Shimizu et al. Radiat Res 1999; 152: 374-89)

Potential Confounding (Shimizu et al. Radiat Res 1999; 152: 374-89)

Non-cancer Mortality (1950-1997) (Preston et al., Radiat Res 2003; 160: 381-407) Excess Relative Risk; proximal group and full cohort

Non-cancer Mortality (1968-1997) (Preston et al., Radiat Res 2003; 160: 381-407) linear fit and smoothed fit (±1SE)

Circulatory Disease Mortality (1968-97) (Preston et al., Radiat Res 2003; 160: 381-407) Linear fits

Non-cancer Mortality (1968-1997) (Preston et al., Radiat Res 2003; 160: 381-407) Linear fits

Non-cancer Mortality (1968-1997) (Preston et al., Radiat Res 2003; 160: 381-407) Heart disease Stroke -Pneumonia -Cirrhosis -Tuberculosis Endpoint Respiratory disease Digestive disease Infectious disease Other diseases -Urinary diseases All non-cancer ERR /Sv/ (90% CI) 0.17 (0.08, 0.26) 0.12 (0.02, 0.22) 0.18 (0.06, 0.32) 0.16 (0.00, 0.32) 0.15 (0.00, 0.32) 0.19 (-0.05, 0.50) -0.02 (<-0.2, 0.25) -0.01 (<-0.2, 0.4) 0.08 (-0.04, 0.23) 0.25 (-0.01, 0.60) 0.14 (0.08, 0.20)

Non-cancer Mortality (1968-1997) (Preston et al. Radiat Res 2003; 160: 381-407) The 273 radiation-associated non-cancer disease deaths (of which 165 are due to heart disease and stroke) compare with 421 cancer deaths attributable to radiation exposure.

Circulatory Disease Incidence (1958-98) (Yamada et al. Radiat Res 2004; 161: 622-32) Statistically significant quadratic dose-responses

Potential Confounding (Yamada et al. Radiat Res 2004; 161: 622-32) Disease (quadratic doseresponse) Hypertension (incidence, 1958-98) Myocardial infarction (<40 year of age ATB) (incidence, 1968-98) RR at 1 Sv (95% CI) No adjustment for smoking and drinking 1.03 (1.00, 1.06) 1.25 (1.00, 1.69) RR at 1 Sv (95% CI) Adjusted for smoking and drinking 1.03 (1.01, 1.06) 1.17 (0.97, 1. 56)

Circulatory Disease Risk Factors Adult Health Study clinical studies show radiation-associated effects on some circulatory disease risk factors (such as blood pressure and cholesterol levels) that could be indicative of underlying biological mechanisms relating to the statistical association between circulatory disease and radiation dose.

Circulatory Disease (Preston et al. Radiat Res 2003; 160: 381-407 Yamada et al. Radiat Res 2004; 161: 622-32) Endpoint (LSS: mortality; AHS: morbidity) LSS heart disease LSS stroke AHS hypertension AHS hypertensive heart disease AHS ischemic heart disease AHS myocardial infarction AHS stroke ERR/Sv (LSS: 90% CI; AHS: 95% CI) 0.17 (0.08, 0.26) 0.12 (0.02, 0.22) 0.05 (-0.01, 0.10) 0.01 (-0.09, 0.09) 0.05 (-0.05, 0.16) 0.12 (-0.16, 0.60) 0.07 (-0.08, 0.24)

Circulatory Disease Dose-response (Little Radiat Environ Biophys 2004; 43: 67-75) Linear threshold: ERR = α (D - D t ) + Linear-quadratic threshold: ERR = α (D - D t ) + + β (D - D t ) + 2 Power of dose: ERR = α D k Mortality Endpoint; dose-response model Heart disease; linear threshold Heart disease; linear-quadratic threshold Heart disease; power of dose Stroke; linear threshold Stroke; linear-quadratic threshold Stroke; power of dose Dose threshold (Sv( Sv) (95% CI) 0.14 (<0, 1.08) 0.15 (<0, 1.22) 0.30 (<0, 3.11) 0.45 (<0, >5.00) Power of dose (95% CI) 1.12 (0.17, 3.34) 1.54 (0.02, >10.00)

Exposure In Utero (Tatsukawa et al. Radiat Res 2008; 170: 269-74) AHS used to investigate circulatory disease incidence during 1978-2003 among ~500 survivors exposed in utero in comparison with incidence among ~1000 survivors exposed as children. No significant effects among in utero exposed, but significant effects for hypertension and cardiovascular disease among childhood exposed. In utero exposed still aged <60 years.

Circulatory Disease Mortality (Work in progress D L Preston) LSS follow-up extended to 1950-2003. ~19 000 circulatory disease deaths. Significant dose-response for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular mortality. ERR/Sv estimates similar to previous analyses. Suggestion of heterogeneity within cardiovascular diseases risk of ischemic heart disease could be lower.

A-bomb Survivors Summary Increased risks of circulatory diseases are apparent below doses of 2 Gy. Represents a significant proportion of radiation-associated mortality. Data consistent with a linear no-threshold dose-response relationship, but Data also consistent with a threshold dose of around 0.5 Gy. Cannot yet reliably eliminate bias and confounding as possible explanations.