Review of unexplained infertility and obstetric outcome: a 10 year review

Similar documents
Articles Follow-up of children born after assisted reproductive technologies

Overview. In Vitro Fertilization: a Success Story

Risk of congenital anomalies in children born after frozen embryo transfer with and without vitrification

Bleeding and spontaneous abortion after therapy for infertility

Recent Developments in Infertility Treatment

A cost comparison of infertility treatment for clomiphene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome Fridstrom M, Sjoblom P, Granberg M, Hillensjo T

Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome

Births following fertility treatment in the GUI infant cohort. Aisling Murray Growing Up in Ireland, ESRI

Supplemental figure 1. Adjusted odds ratios for gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, premature birth and miscarriage for women with and without PCOS.

The New England Journal of Medicine

Original Article Pregnancy Complications - Consequence of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome or Body Mass Index?

NICE fertility guidelines. Hemlata Thackare MPhil MSc MRCOG Deputy Medical Director London Women s Clinic

Article Obstetric and perinatal outcome of 1655 ICSI and 3974 IVF singleton and 1102 ICSI and 2901 IVF twin births: a comparative analysis

International Federation of Fertility Societies. Global Standards of Infertility Care

Embryo Selection after IVF

Dr Manuela Toledo - Procedures in ART -

Perinatal and infant mortality in term and preterm births among women with type 1 diabetes

Report to the Director-General of Health on the Risks and Benefits Associated with Assisted Reproductive Technologies

COMPLICATIONS OF PRE-GESTATIONAL AND GESTATIONAL DIABETES IN SAUDI WOMEN: ANALYSIS FROM RIYADH MOTHER AND BABY COHORT STUDY (RAHMA)

IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention

The impact of an assisted conception unit on the workload of a general gynaecology unit

Surveillance report Published: 9 January 2017 nice.org.uk

IVF Health Risk 503,000 Hit in Google in 0.2 seconds

The major causes of female infertility include ovulatory dysfunction, tubal and peritoneal

The costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK

CLINICAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTION

Blackpool CCG. Policies for the Commissioning of Healthcare. Assisted Conception

NHS FUNDED TREATMENT FOR SUBFERTILITY. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA POLICY GUIDANCE/OPTIONS FOR CCGs

Supplemental Table 1. Study design and participant characteristics.

Infertility, infertility treatment and twinning: the Danish National Birth Cohort

of conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy

Honorary Fellow of the Royal College of Obs. & Gyn. First Indian to receive FIGO s Distinguished Merit Award for Services towards women s health.

ASSISTED CONCEPTION NHS FUNDED TREATMENT FOR SUBFERTILITY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA & POLICY GUIDANCE

St Helens CCG NHS Funded Treatment for Subfertility Policy 2015/16

The first live birth after the transfer

Pregnancy outcome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Health technology Immediate in vitro fertilisation (IVF) was compared with gonadotropins followed by IVF as treatment for primary infertility.

Registers of in-vitro fertilization and assisted conception

Complete failure of fertilization in couples with unexplained infertility: implications for subsequent in vitro fertilization cycles

Fetal & Maternal Outcome of Diabetes Mellitus at Aljomhoria Hospital, Benghazi-Libya, 2010

Risk factors for monozygotic twinning in IVF: a multicenter, cohort study

Study population The hypothetical study population comprised women with WHO 2 anovulatory infertility.

Prevalence of thyroid disorder in pregnancy and pregnancy outcome

OUTCOMES OF INFANTS EXPOSED TO MULTIPLE ANTIDEPRESSANTS DURING PREGNANCY: RESULTS OF A COHORT STUDY

CLINICAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTION

Infertility treatment

NaProTechnology Natural Procreative Technology

Minimal stimulation protocol for use with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility Dhaliwal L K, Sialy R K, Gopalan S, Majumdar S

HALTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP NHS FUNDED TREATMENT FOR SUBFERTILITY. CONTENTS Page

Maternal and perinatal outcome in antenatal women with hypothyroidism

NaProTechnology. An Integrated Approach to Infertility. Tracy Parnell. Geneva 2005

Is meaningful reporting of national IVF outcome data possible?

Abstract. Introduction. Materials and methods. Patients and methods

The predictive value of idiopathic failure to fertilize on the first in vitro fertilization attempt*

Children born after assisted fertilization have an increased rate of major congenital anomalies

Ovarian response in three consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles

Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; September 2015: Vol.-4, Issue- 4, P

Live birth outcome, spontaneous pregnancy and adoption up to five years after undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment

T39: Fertility Policy Checklist

Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Birth Defects

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ) New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey

Universal Embryo Cryopreservation: Frozen versus Fresh Transfer. Zaher Merhi, M.D.

FERTILITY SERVICE POLICY

Research Article Implementation of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria: Not Always a Cause for Concern

Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE

Comparative study of obstetric and neonatal outcomes of live births between poor- and good- quality embryo transfers

Maternal And Fetal Outcome In Pregnancies Complicated With Maternal Cardiac Diseases: Experience At A Tertiary Care Hospital

IVM in PCOS patients. Introduction (1) Introduction (2) Michael Grynberg René Frydman

Is the fallopian tube better than the uterus? Evidence on intrauterine insemination versus fallopian sperm perfusion

European IVF Monitoring (EIM) Year: 2013

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH DIZYGOTIC TWINNING AFTER IVF TREATMENT WITH DOUBLE EMBRYO TRANSFER

Spontaneous conception after a successful attempt at in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Fertility Assessment and Treatment Pathway

Time to improvement in semen parameters after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with severe oligospermia

Fertility 101. About SCRC. A Primary Care Approach to Diagnosing and Treating Infertility. Definition of Infertility. Dr.

The cost of infertility diagnosis and treatment in Canada in 1995

Disclosures. Win Fertility UpToDate

Cancer Risks of Ovulation Induction

A descriptive study of the prevalence of hypothyroidism among antenatal women and foetal outcome in treated hypothyroid women

Fertility Preservation By Dr Mary Birdsall Chair, Fertility Associates

PRETREATMENT ASSESSMENT & MANAGEMENT (MODULE 1 B) March, 2018

Dr Veenu Gupta MD MRCPsych Consultant, Child Psychiatrist Stockton on Tees, UK

Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy: pregnancy-based surveys from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden

Type 1 diabetes accounts for 5e10% of diabetes diagnoses,

* Present address: Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Modified natural cycle IVF and mild IVF: a 10 year Swedish experience

Clinical Policy Committee

Hospital care utilization of IVF/ICSI twins followed until 2 7 years of age: a controlled Danish national cohort study

The length of the fertile window is associated with the chance of spontaneously conceiving an ongoing pregnancy in subfertile couples

Neil Goodman, MD, FACE

Cite this article as: BMJ, doi: /bmj ae (published 7 August 2006)

Fertility Treatment: Do not be Distracted

Unexplained infertility Evidence based management

Fertility assessment and assisted conception

Cite this article as: BMJ, doi: /bmj ae (published 25 October 2005)

WOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL Providence, RI CONSENT FOR THAWING AND TRANSFER OF CRYOPRESERVED EMBRYOS. I and

Clinical Policy Committee

CONTROVERSY: INSURANCE COVERAGE

Management of Pregestational and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Transcription:

Human Reproduction Vol.16, No.12 pp. 2593 2597, 2001 Review of unexplained infertility and obstetric outcome: a 10 year review Zabeena Pandian 1, Siladitya Bhattacharya and Allan Templeton Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: z.pandian@abdn.ac.uk BACKGROUND: Increased maternal and fetal risks have been reported in pregnancies following unexplained infertility. Our aims were to examine the obstetric and perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies in couples with unexplained infertility and explore the impact of fertility treatment. METHODS: Women with unexplained infertility were identified from the Aberdeen Fertility Clinic Database. Their unit numbers were matched against the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank (AMND) in order to extract obstetric records of those women with subsequent pregnancy outcomes. The general obstetric population served as a control group. RESULTS: Women with unexplained infertility were older [30.8 versus 27.9 years, 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference 2.4 to 3.4] and more likely to be primiparous (59 versus 40%, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.9). After adjusting for age and parity they had a higher incidence of pre-eclampsia, abruptio placentae, preterm labour, emergency Caesarean section and induction of labour in comparison with the general population (P < 0.05). Perinatal outcome did not differ between women with unexplained infertility and those of the general population. The multiple pregnancy rate was 5.4% higher following fertility treatment than in women who conceived spontaneously (95% CI 2.8 to 9.7). CONCLUSIONS: Women with unexplained infertility are at higher risk of obstetric complications which persist even after adjusting for age, parity and fertility treatment. The reasons are however unclear and merit further study. Key words: obstetric outcome/perinatal outcome/treatment-independent/treatment-related/unexplained infertility Introduction Pregnancies in women with infertility have been linked with increased maternal and perinatal risks (Ghazi et al., 1991; Rizk et al., 1991; Tan et al., 1992). Most complications have been attributed to the higher number of multiple pregnancies after fertility treatment but even singleton pregnancies have been shown to be associated with increased rates of vaginal bleeding, placenta praevia, pregnancy induced hypertension and Caesarean section (Tan et al., 1992; McFaul et al., 1993). Higher perinatal risks, including prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation and low birth weight have also been highlighted in these pregnancies (Ghazi et al., 1991; Sundstrom et al., 1997) although, in the absence of multiple pregnancies, the cause for this phenomenon has yet to be identified. It is unclear from previous studies (Wang et al., 1994; Isaksson and Tiitinen, 1998) if these effects are associated with patient characteristics (older age and primiparity) or some unknown factor intrinsic to these couples. In addition, the relative contribution of fertility treatment itself remains unexplored. A quarter of all infertile couples have unexplained infertility (Templeton and Penney, 1982). In comparison with other groups, these couples experience a relatively high spontaneous pregnancy rate (Templeton and Penney, 1982; Collins et al., 1995), but also face the prospect of treatment, which in the absence of a diagnosed cause is essentially empirical. These are important considerations which should be taken into account when deciding the timing and choice of treatment, especially if treatment has the potential to increase maternal and fetal risks. We aimed to assess the obstetric risks associated with unexplained infertility and explore the factors responsible for them by comparing firstly, the outcome of pregnancy in couples with unexplained infertility with that in the general population and secondly, treatment-related and treatmentindependent pregnancies. As many of these risks are associated with multiple pregnancies, these were excluded from our analysis. The presence of two large local databases [The Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank (AMND) and the Aberdeen Fertility Clinic database] and the presence of a relatively stable population in the north-east of Scotland allowed us to perform these comparisons. The AMND contains information on all obstetric and fertility related gynaecological events in women in a defined geographical area (Aberdeen City District) with a stable catchment population since 1951 (Samphier and Thompson, 1981). Stringent and consistent criteria, which are essential both for studies of secular change and for intergenerational studies, have been used for the coding European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2593

Z.Pandian, S.Bhattacharya and A.Templeton of gestational length, birth weight, pregnancy complications and the classification of perinatal events. Since 1989 the Aberdeen Fertility Clinic database has collected information prospectively related to all couples referred to the Fertility Clinic and contains detailed case records of more than 4000 couples. Record linkage allows easy identification of complete reproductive histories of individuals as well as families. Materials and methods Couples resident in Aberdeen with unexplained infertility of more than 12 months duration were identified from the Fertility Clinic database. Infertility history and treatment details of couples seen between March 1989 and March 1999 were also derived from the database. The following criteria were used to make a diagnosis of unexplained infertility: mid-luteal serum progesterone concentration 20 nmol/l, bilateral tubal patency demonstrated by laparoscopy or hysterosalpingogram and normal semen parameters (World Health Organization, 1999). Follow-up of the couples was for a minimum of 12 months. Obstetric records of the women with unexplained infertility were identified from the AMND by using name and unit number. Data related to maternal and perinatal complications were obtained, and the results were then compared with the figures for the local obstetric population during the same period of time. The outcomes of spontaneous and treatment-related pregnancies were also compared. Only the first delivery that occurred after the onset of investigation was studied. Multiple pregnancies were excluded from the analysis because they carry a higher risk of obstetric and perinatal complications in comparison with singleton pregnancies. As birth weight is not normally distributed at each week of gestation, birth weights were assessed using standardized birth weight score (SBW) which adjusts for parity, gestation and sex of the newborn (Campbell et al., 1993). Statistics Statistical analysis was carried out using the statistical package SPSS for windows (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). Student s t-test, the Mann Whitney U-test, Fisher s exact test and χ 2 test were used where appropriate. Confidence intervals were calculated using the CIA programme (Wilson s method). Logistic regression was used to calculate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios where indicated. Results A total of 1049 couples with unexplained infertility was initially identified from the Fertility Clinic database; 172 couples were subsequently excluded from analysis due to insufficient data. Of the remaining 877 couples, 498 (57%) had a pregnancy outcome and were analysed in detail. The relevant infertility treatments and the percentage of women requiring them were: administration of clomiphene citrate (39%), ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination (11%) and IVF (50%). Characteristics of the women with unexplained infertility are shown in Table I. The general population which comprised the comparison group consisted of 32 969 singleton deliveries during the same period of time (1989 1999). In comparison with the general obstetric population, women with unexplained infertility who delivered were significantly older. The mean (SD) age in the two groups were 30.8 (4.5) versus 27.9 (5.3) years, 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference 2.2 to 3.2. Infertile women were also more likely to be primiparous (59 versus 40%, 95% CI for difference 1.3 to 1.9). The outcome of pregnancies in women with unexplained infertility is shown in Figure 1. The multiple pregnancy rate was 5.4% higher in the treatment group compared with the spontaneous pregnancy group (95% CI for difference 2.8 to 9.7). Obstetric complications Table II shows the incidence of obstetric complications among singleton live births in couples with unexplained infertility. When compared with the general population, the incidence of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption and preterm labour between 24 and 37 completed weeks of gestation was significantly higher in women with unexplained infertility (P 0.05). Obstetric interventions including Caesarean sections and induction of labour (P 0.05) were also more common. Table III demonstrates that these differences were significant even after adjusting for differences in age and parity between women with unexplained infertility and the general population. There were no differences in obstetric interventions or complications between the treatment-independent and treatment-related pregnancies. Perinatal outcome Table IV summarizes the perinatal outcome of singleton births. When compared with the general population the mean [SD] duration of pregnancy and the apgar scores at 1 min and 5 Table I. Characteristics of women with unexplained infertility who delivered singletons babies. Values are given as n (%) or mean (SD) unless otherwise stated Treatment-independent Treatment-related Difference n 222 n 162 (95% CI) Maternal age (years) 30.6 (4.1) 30.9 (4.7) 0.3 ( 1.2 to 5.8) Maternal age 35 years 183 (82) 143 (88) 6 ( 1.3 to 0.1) Maternal age 35 years 39 (18) 19 (12) 6 ( 0.2 to 1.3) Duration of infertility (years) a 3.2 (5.5) 3.78 (2.1) 0.58 ( 1.34 to 0.18) Duration of follow-up (years) 6.2 (2.5) 6.2 (2.5) 0 ( 0.44 to 0.44) Primary infertility 131 (59) 97 (60) 1 ( 1.1 to 0.9) Secondary infertility 91 (41) 65 (40) 1 ( 0.9 to 1.1) a Number of years of infertility at presentation plus the number of years from presentation up to conception. CI confidence interval. 2594

Obstetric outcome in unexplained infertility min were lower in the infants of these couples but still within the normal range. There were no significant differences in the perinatal outcome between the treatment-independent and treatment-related singleton births. Discussion Our results suggest that even in the absence of multiple pregnancy, women with unexplained infertility face an increased likelihood of obstetric complications which are independent of age, parity and fertility treatment. However, the perinatal outcome appears to be unchanged. This is the largest descriptive study focusing on couples with unexplained infertility. Collection of data from both the Fertility Clinic database and the AMND was done prospectively, thus reducing recall bias. Standardized birthweight score (SBW) was preferred to crude birthweight in determining differences in birth weights of infants of the couples in the study. Figure 1. Outcome of spontaneous and treatment-related pregnancies. Table II. Obstetric complications in women with unexplained infertility (singletons only). Values are given as n (%) unless otherwise stated Couples with Total Difference Treatment- Treatment- Difference unexplained population (95% CI) independent related (95% CI) infertility n 32 969 n 222 n 162 n 369 Pre-eclampsia 18 (5) 659 (2) 3 ( 1.1 to 5.6) 10 (4) 8 (5) 1 ( 0.2 to 3.6) Eclampsia 1 (0.3) 33 (0.1) 0.2 ( 0.1 to 1.4) 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 0.4 ( 2.1 to 2.5) Abruption (APH) 7 (2) 230 (0.7) 1.3 ( 0.2 to 3.2) 3 (1) 4 (2) 1 ( 5.5 to 1.7) Placenta praevia 3 (0.8) 132 (0.4) 0.4 ( 0.1 to 2) 2 (0.9) 1 (0.6) 0.3 ( 2.9 to 2.6) Gestation at delivery 24 37 weeks 41 (11) 1912 (6) 5 ( 2.5 to 8.9) 23 (10) 18 (12) 2 ( 8.9 to 4.7) 37 weeks 328 (89) 30 990 (94) 5 ( 8.7 to 1.9) 198 (90) 130 (88) 2 ( 4.7 to 8.9) Induced labour 105 (28) 7253 (22) 6 ( 2.1 to 11.3) 63 (28) 42 (28) 0 ( 9.4 to 9.3) Elective Caesarean sections 23 (6) 1846 (5) 1 ( 1.4 to 3.6) 14 (6) 9 (6) 0 ( 5.4 to 5.2) Emergency Caesarean sections 75 (20) 3066 (9) 11 ( 7.2 to 15.4) 42 (19) 33 (22) 3 ( 12 to 4.9) 2595

Z.Pandian, S.Bhattacharya and A.Templeton Some difficulties were encountered during this study. In comparison with the general population, women with unexplained infertility are usually older and are less likely to have had previous deliveries. Multiple births are common and a significant proportion of women would have been exposed to assisted reproductive techniques. Under these conditions, identification of an appropriate matched control can be difficult (McFaul et al., 1993). We decided to use women who conceived spontaneously and delivered between 1989 and 1999 in Aberdeen as a comparison group and adjusted for differences in age and parity. Only data relating to singletons were analysed in order to avoid the possible confounding effects of multiple pregnancies. We also made the assumption that the details of all women who were resident in Aberdeen and had a pregnancy outcome during the period of the study would be registered with the AMND. Although there is a possibility that a small number of women could have delivered elsewhere, the relative stability of the Aberdeen population which has an out- migration rate (including deaths) of about 3% (Hall et al., 1989), ensures that those delivering elsewhere constitute a small minority. The literature surrounding obstetric outcome in couples with unexplained infertility is very limited. Most studies involve relatively small numbers of patients with limited follow-up (Sundstrom et al., 1997; Isaksson and Tiitinen, 1998). The results of our study agree with some previous reports (Saunders et al., 1988; Reubinoff et al., 1997; Isaksson and Tiitinen, Table III. Risk of obstetric complications in women with unexplained infertility (singletons only) Unadjusted Odds ratio adjusted odds ratio for age and parity (95% CI) (95% CI) Placental abruption 2.93 (1.4 5.9) 3.05 (1.4 6.2) Pre-eclampsia 6.16 (3.7 10.1) 5.61 (3.3 9.3) Caesarean section 1.95 (1.5 2.4) 1.46 (1.1 1.8) Induction of labour 1.31 (1.0 1.6) 1.24 (1.0 1.5) 1998) which suggest that infertility treatment per se is not associated with a higher incidence of pre eclampsia, abruption and preterm deliveries. In contrast to previous reports (Tuck et al., 1988; Li et al., 1991), our study fails to confirm a link between these complications and advanced maternal age. In comparison with the general population, there seemed to be a lower threshold for obstetric interventions including induction of labour and Caesarean sections in couples with unexplained infertility. Contrary to findings from previous studies (Reubinoff et al., 1997), fertility treatment did not seem to influence the rate of Caesarean sections. Overall, the lower threshold for obstetric interventions in these couples could be partly attributed to the anxiety around these pregnancies and the influence of a history of infertility on the clinician s decision making. The results of our study indicate no increase in perinatal risks in couples with unexplained infertility. Adverse perinatal outcomes including stillbirth, low birth weight, neonatal unit admissions, and early and late neonatal deaths in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment have been reported by various authors (Rizk et al., 1991; McFaul et al., 1993). The comparable birth weights in the treatmentindependent and treatment-related groups observed in our study concur with results of some studies (Frydman et al., 1986; Hill et al., 1990; Reubinoff et al., 1997) but not with others (Rizk et al., 1991; McFaul et al., 1993; Olivennes et al., 1997). The disparity of the results in the literature may be due to differences in statistical power, study design, choice of controls and the possible confounding effects of premature babies. For many of the rarer events of interest, especially perinatal mortality, a much larger number of patients is required to provide the statistical power necessary to draw any firm conclusions. In comparison with other published reports (Beral and Doyle, 1990; Bergh et al., 1999; SART registry, 1999) the group of patients who underwent assisted reproduction treatment in our study was small. Women with a history of unexplained infertility are perhaps more closely monitored than others and consequently have a Table IV. Perinatal outcome in couples with unexplained infertility (singleton births). Values are given as n (%) or mean (SD) unless otherwise stated All couples with Total Difference Treatment- Treatment- Difference unexplained population (95% CI) independent related (95%CI) infertility n 32 969 n 222 n 162 n 384 Gestation (weeks) Mean (SD) 38.93 (2.67) 39.40 (1.90) 0.47 ( 0.66 to 0.27) 39.05 (2.49) 38.77 (2.88) 0.28 ( 0.26 to 0.82) Sex Male 225 (58) 16 814 (51) 7 ( 2.1 to 11.9) 132 (59) 93 (57) 2 ( 6.6 to 13.2) Female 159 (41) 16 154 (49) 8 ( 12.4 to 2.6) 90 (40) 69 (43) 3 ( 12.0 to 7.8) Apgar score at 1 min Mean (SD) 7.74 (1.98) 8.07 (1.56) 0.33 ( 0.48 to 0.17) 7.83 (1.85) 7.62 (2.14) 0.21 ( 0.19 to 0.61) Apgar score at 5min Mean (SD) 8.70 (1.56) 8.95 (0.69) 0.25 ( 0.32 to 0.17) 8.78 (1.39) 8.60 (1.76) 0.18 ( 0.13 to 0.49) Standardized birth weight score 0.10 (1.03) 0.023 (0.99) 0.08 ( 3.3 to 16.7) 0.05 (1.06) 0.14 (1.02) 0.09 ( 30.2 to 12.2) Admissions to neonatal unit 38 (10) 2637 (8) 2 ( 0.7 to 5.3) 23 (10) 15 (9) 1 ( 5.3 to 7.0) First day neonatal death 1 (0.3) 45 (0.1) 0.2 ( 0.1 to 1.4) 0 (0) 1 (0.6) 0.6 ( 3.4 to 1.2) First week neonatal death 1 (0.3) 28 (0.1) 0.2 ( 0.1 to 1.4) 0 (0) 1 (0.6) 0.6 ( 3.4 to 1.2) (excluding 1st day death) 2596

Obstetric outcome in unexplained infertility higher pick-up rate of any potential problems. This may lead to an increased diagnosis of obstetric complications and a greater chance of surgical intervention. Traditionally, a higher complication rate in these women has been ascribed to increased maternal age and a higher proportion of multiple pregnancies. Our study shows that these risks persist even after adjusting for these factors. Apart from increasing the chance of multiple pregnancy, fertility treatment per se does not increase either the complication rate or the rate of intervention in these women. Although a lower threshold for intervention cannot be ruled out, women with unexplained infertility may be a genuine high risk group who would benefit from better counselling and additional care. More work is needed to explore the link between obstetric complications and unexplained infertility. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Dr Doris Campbell for facilitating the extraction of data from the AMND and for her comments on the manuscript. They also acknowledge the contribution of Ms Linda Murdoch who extracted the relevant data from the AMND. References Beral, V. and Doyle, P. (1990) MRC working party on children conceived by in vitro fertilisation; births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception 1978 1987. Br. Med. J., 300, 1229 1233. Bergh, T., Ericson, A., Hillensjo, T. et al. (1999) Deliveries and children born after in vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982 95; a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 354, 1579 1585. Campbell, D., Hall, M., Lemon, J. et al. (1993) Clinical birth weight standards for a total population in the 1980s. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 100, 436 445. Collins, J.A., Elizabeth, A.B. and Willan, A.R. (1995) The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil. Steril., 64, 22 28. Frydman, R., Belaisch-Allart, J., Fries, N. et al. (1986) An obstetric assessment of the first 100 births from the invitro fertilisation program at Clamart, France. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 154, 550 555. Ghazi, H.A., Spielberger, C. and Kallen, B. (1991) Delivery outcome after infertility a registry study. Fertil. Steril., 55, 726 732. Hall, M.H., Campbell, D.M., Fraser, C. et al. (1989) Mode of delivery and future fertility. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 96, 1297 1303. Hill, G.A., Bryan, S., Herbert, C.M. III et al. (1990) Complications of pregnancy in infertile couples: routine versus assisted reproduction. Obstet. Gynaecol., 75, 790 794. Isaksson, R. and Tiitinen, A. (1998) Obstetric outcome in patients with unexplained infertility: comparison of treatment-related and spontaneous pregnancies. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 77, 849 853. Li, T.C., MacLeod, I., Singhal, V. et al. (1991) The obstetric and neonatal outcome of pregnancies in women with previous history of infertility, a prospective study. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 98, 1087 1092. McFaul, P.B., Patel, N. and Mills, J. (1993) An audit of the obstetric outcome of 148 consecutive pregnancies from assisted conception. Implications for neonatal services. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 100, 820 825. Olivennes, F., Kerbrat, V., Rufat, P. et al. (1997) Follow-up of a cohort of 422 children aged 6 13 years conceived by in vitro fertilisation. Fertil. Steril., 67, 284 289. Reubinoff, B.E., Samueloff, A., Ben-Haim, M. et al. (1997) Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study. Fertil. Steril., 67, 1077 1083. Rizk, B., Doyle, P., Tan, S.L. et al. (1991) Perinatal outcome and congenital malformations in IVF babies from Bourn Hallam group. Hum. Reprod., 6, 1259 1264. Samphier, M. and Thompson, B. (1981) The Aberdeen maternity and neonatal databank. In Mednick, S.A. and Baert, A.E. (eds) Prospective longitudinal research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 61 65. SART Registry (1999) Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1996 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil. Steril., 71, 798 807. Saunders, D.M., Mathew, M. and Lancaster, P.A.L. (1988) The Australian Register: current research and future role. A preliminary report. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 541, 7 21. Sundstrom, I., Ildgruben, A. and Hogberg, U. (1997) Treatment related and treatment independent deliveries among infertile couples, a long term follow up. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 76, 238 243. Tan, S.L., Doyle, P., Campbell, S. et al. (1992) Obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilisation pregnancies compared with normally conceived pregnancies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 167, 778 784. Templeton, A.A. and Penney, G.C. (1982) The incidence, characteristics and prognosis of patients whose infertility is unexplained. Fertil. Steril., 37, 175 182. Tuck, S.M., Yudkin, P.L. and Turnbull, A.C. (1988). Pregnancy outcome in elderly primigravida with and without a history of infertility. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 95, 230 237. Wang, X.J., Clark, A.M., Kirby, C.A. et al. (1994) The obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies following in-vitro fertilization/gamete intra-fallopian transfer. Hum. Reprod., 9, 141 146. World Health Organization (1999) Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 60 61. Received on April 9, 2001; accepted on September 6, 2001 2597