HEARING CONSERVATION CHECKLIST

Similar documents
Hearing Conservation Program Evaluation Checklist

11. Hearing Conservation Program Chapter , WAC

Hearing Conservation Program April 27, 2018

HEARING CONSERVATION PROCEDURE

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program

Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual

Hearing Conservation Program

HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES

HEARING CONSERVATION PURPOSE

Craven Community College HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program. Southwestern Community College. Office of Human Resources

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program Table of Contents

Hearing Conservation Program. Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053

Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003

Hearing Conservation Program

Environment CAUTION HEARING PROTECTION REQUIRED. Occupational Noise Exposure Requirements for Photographic Processing Facilities

Hearing Conservation Program Regulations and Recommendations Summary

Hearing Conservation Plan

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY SUPPLY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Santa Clarita Community College District HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Revised

CCS Administrative Procedure H Hearing Conservation

San Diego Community College OSHA Standards

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Plan

NC Employees Workplace Program Requirements for Safety and Health. Hearing Conservation

Delaware State University

Hearing Conservation Program Administration

Effective Date: 27-February Table of Contents

NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM YALE UNIVERSITY

Hearing Conservation Program

BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE

Health, Safety, Security and Environment

SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY S WRITTEN HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM December 2017

Villanova University Department of Environmental Health and Safety Policy and Procedure Manual

UCSD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) and Center for Occupational & Environmental Medicine (COEM) 2017

Page104. Hearing Conservation Program

Procedure. Procedure

Environmental Health and Safety. Hearing Conservation Program

Prepared By: Blake Smith/James Stubbs

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation

Hearing Conservation Program

The University of Texas at El Paso

Contents. 1) Purpose ) Policy ) Definitions ) Procedure a) Requirements b) Noise standard... 4

Hearing Conservation Program

POLICY TRAINING HEARING PROTECTION. Noise Exposure

Hearing Conservation Program

Model Safety Program

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM REVISED AS OF 12 JULY 2010

Hearing Conservation

SUNY Cortland Environmental Health and Safety Office Hearing Conservation Program

UC Merced Hearing Conservation Program

UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED Hearing Conservation

Rutgers Environmental Health and Safety (REHS)

Environmental Health & Safety Programs

Hearing Conservation Program

Town of Brunswick. Hearing Conservation Plan

SNAP-ON INCORPORATED STANDARD ON HEARING CONSERVATION

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Texas Christian University

Health Standards to Protect Miners from Hearing Loss

Your Company Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Services Specifications

North Dakota State University Noise/Hearing Conservation

UC Santa Barbara Hearing Conservation Program Manual

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY & HEALTH OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE

Establishing an Effective Hearing Conservation Program. Sarah E. Mouser, AuD, CCC-A Doctor of Audiology & Customer Relations Facilitator

East Carolina University

Vision Painting Inc. Safety Management System

Baylor University Hearing Conservation Program OSHA 29 CFR

Occupational Noise Exposure

Hearing Conservation Program

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Loss and Conservation in Industrial Settings

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

noise induced Working Together to Prevent Hearing Loss

CITY OF FORT BRAGG HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

This program is designed to prevent hearing loss for students, staff and employees while engaged in universitysponsored

SAINT MARY S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Prepared by SAINT MARY S COLLEGE OF CA MORAGA, CA KAREN LAURICELLA

(b) is as low as is reasonably practicable, where it is not reasonably practicable to meet the standard under clause (a).

Purpose: To provide a process to protect employees from hearing loss caused by excessive occupational exposure to noise.

ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

What s New? Example 2 Employee B. Example 1 - Employee A

OCCUPATIONAL NOISE PROGRAM

Noise Self-Inspection Checklist


HEARING CONSERVATION REPORT

INDH 5131 Controls of Occupational Hazards. Noise & Hearing Conservation. Part II. V. Audiometric Testing

Hearing Conservation Program

EFF Assessment Task. Noise in the Workplace

Encl: (1) Navy Medicine Hearing Conservation Program Implementation and Management

Hearing Loss Prevention Program

3M Center for Hearing Conservation

SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION 2 PURPOSE 2 SCOPE 2 DEFINITIONS 2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT 3 RESPONSIBILITIES 4

Transcription:

HEARING CONSERVATION CHECKLIST USE CHECKLIST TO EVALUATE YOUR HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Here s a Checklist you can adapt and use to evaluate your own hearing conservation program. You should be able to answer YES to each listed measure. For any item to which you answer NO, include an explanation and/or corrective action in the far right box. According to the OSHA Occupational Noise Exposure standard (Sec. 1910.95) it is required that employers to develop and implement a hearing conservation program providing for monitoring, audiometric testing, use of hearing protectors, training and record keeping, among other things. Once you establish your program, you need to periodically evaluate its effectiveness, identify shortfalls and implement improvements and corrective actions. For More Information: HEAD OFFICE Custom Protect Ear 681-7789 134th Street Surrey, BC V3W 9E9 Canada Phone: 604-599-1311 ext 310 Toll-free: 1-800-520-0220 ext 310 Fax: 604-599-7377 Email: hear@protectear.com Protectear-USA Toll-free: 1-800-520-0220 ext. 310 Email: hearus@protectear.com www.protectear.com

COMPANY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM CHECKLIST TRAINING & EDUCATION Training conducted at least once a year Training provided by qualified instructor Effectiveness of each training program evaluated Contents of training program revised periodically and in response to new conditions, procedures, equipment or other aspects affecting noise exposure Managers and supervisors directly involved in training Training supplemented with visuals, posters, handouts, etc. Personal training provided to employees having problems with hearing protection equipment Personal training provided to employees showing hearing threshold shifts(1) SUPERVISOR ENGAGEMENT Supervisors have knowledge necessary to supervise use and care of hearing protectors by employees they oversee Supervisors themselves wear and properly use and care for hearing protectors Supervisors report and receive guidance when employees refuse to wear hearing protectors Supervisors report and receive guidance when employees don t show up for hearing tests or training Supervisors trained to use discipline to enforce hearing conservation program requirements Supervisors receive retraining periodically and when necessitated by changes in conditions, equipment, procedures or other items affecting noise exposure NOISE MEASUREMENT All essential noise studies performed Purpose of each noise study clearly explained Employees exposed to noise notified of exposure and risks to hearing Results routinely transmitted to supervisors and other key individuals Results recorded in health records of exposed

employee Noise maps created and properly used Noise measurement results used to select and procure appropriate hearing protection equipment Noise measurement results used to modify physical layout or design or facility Noise measurement results used to locate and relocate employees New or follow-up noise measurements taken in response to changes to work area, equipment, processes or other conditions affecting noise exposure Are steps taken to include or exclude employees in hearing loss prevention programs when noise exposures change significantly ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS Noise controls prioritized Cost-effectiveness of each option considered Employees and supervisors apprised of noise control measures taken or planned Employees and supervisors consulted on noise control measures taken or planned Employees and supervisors consulted on operation of noise control measures taken or planned Noise control measures monitored for effectiveness Full potential for administrative controls evaluated, including conducting noisy processes with fewer employees MONITORING AUDIOMETRY & RECORDKEEPING Audiometric technician who conducts testing adequately trained, certified and recertified On-the-job observations made to verify that technician performs thorough and valid audiometric tests On-the-job observations made to verify that technician instructs and consults employees effectively On-the-job observations made to verify that technician keeps appropriate records Follow-up actions taken and properly documented Hearing threshold levels reasonably consistent from test to test If hearing threshold levels are not reasonably consistent from test to test, prompt investigations are made to determine reason(s) Annual test results compared to employee s baseline to determine presence of a standard threshold shift(1)

Annual incidence of standard threshold shift(1) is no greater that [fill in] percent If annual incidence of standard threshold shift(1) is greater that [fill in] percent, reasons are identified and corrective actions implemented Audiometric trends (deteriorations) identified in both individuals and groups of employees (NIOSH recommends that no more than 5% of workers show 15 db Significant Threshold Shift, same ear, same frequency) Records kept to document that appropriate audiometer calibration procedures followed Records kept to document that background sound levels in audiometer room were low enough to permit valid testing Results of audiometric tests communicated to supervisors Results of audiometric tests communicated to managers Results of audiometric tests communicated to employees Corrective action taken if rate of no-shows for audiometric test appointments is more than 5% Employees experiencing standard threshold shift(1) notified in writing within at least 21 days of determination (NIOSH recommends immediate notification if retest shows 15 db Significant Threshold Shift, same ear, same frequency) REFERRALS FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT Referral procedures clearly explained Letters of agreement between Company ABC and consulting physician or audiologist have been signed Mechanisms in place, e.g., affecting transportation, scheduling, appointment reminders, to ensure employees needing evaluation or treatment actually receive it Employees referred for treatment understand the condition requiring treatment, the treatment needed and the methods of obtaining it HEARING PROTECTORS Hearing protectors made available to employees whose 8-hour TWA(2) noise exposure is 85dBA or above Employees given opportunity to select from a variety of appropriate hearing protectors

Employees fitted carefully with special attention to comfort Employees receive thorough initial training Employees receive thorough training at least once a year Protectors checked regularly for wear or defects Protectors found to have wear or defect are immediately replaced Replacements readily available to employees that use disposable hearing protectors Employees understand and apply proper hearing protector hygiene practices Appropriate corrective actions are taken and treatment provided when employees develop ear infections or irritation as a result of using hearing protectors Alternative types of hearing protectors considered in response to problems with current equipment New types of potentially more effective hearing protectors considered as they become available Employees who experience noise-induced hearing loss receive appropriate counseling Individuals who fit and supervise wearing of hearing protectors are competent to perform these functions and deal with hearing protector problems that may arise Immediate action is taken in response to employee complaints about hearing protectors including complaints about comfort, interference on ability to do the job, interference with ability to hear instructions, warning signals, etc. Employees that engage in noisy activities outside the job encouraged to take their hearing protectors home Effectiveness of hearing protector program regularly evaluated At-the-ear protection levels evaluated to ensure that over or under protection is balanced according to anticipated ambient noise levels Each user of a hearing protector required to demonstrate understanding of how to use and care for the protector Records kept to show that e ach user of a hearing protector has demonstrated understanding of how to use and care for the protector PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Program modified in response to changes in OSHA, other federal or state regulations Copies of Program and related documents kept at ABC

Company offices All individuals involved in implementing Program are aware of and properly trained and instructed to carry out their responsibilities Performance of key Program personnel periodically evaluated Program regularly reviewed and in response to changes in equipment, operations and other conditions that affect or may potentially affect level of noise exposure Corrective actions taken to address identified problems and improve Program effectiveness Records of Program review and corrective actions maintained NOTES (1) A standard threshold shift means a change in hearing threshold relative to the baseline audiogram of an average of 10 db or more at 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz in either ear. (2) TWA means a time-weighted average sound level in decibels measured on the A scale (slow response)