National System for Incident Reporting in Radiation Therapy (NSIR-RT) Taxonomy

Similar documents
The Canadian National System for Incident Reporting in Radiation Treatment (NSIR-RT) Taxonomy March 11, 2015

Medical Dosimetry Graduate Certificate Program IU Graduate School & The Department of Radiation Oncology IU Simon Cancer Center

Standards for Radiation Oncology

Radiotherapy physics & Equipments

EORTC Member Facility Questionnaire

Accuracy Requirements and Uncertainty Considerations in Radiation Therapy

Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Canadian Radiation Treatment Programs

RADIATION ONCOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAM Competency Evaluation of Resident

Medical Errors in Radiation Therapy 2014

Goals and Objectives: Head and Neck Cancer Service Department of Radiation Oncology

Who Should Know Radiation Oncology Coding?

Public Comment Period for Proposed Radiation Oncology Survivorship Care Plan Template

QUARTERLY REPORT PATIENT SAFETY WORK PRODUCT Q J A N UA RY 1, 2016 MA R C H 31, 2016

Therapeutic ratio - An Overview. Past Present Future Prof Ramesh S Bilimaga

IMRT/IGRT Patient Treatment: A Community Hospital Experience. Charles M. Able, Assistant Professor

CURRICULUM OUTLINE FOR TRANSITIONING FROM 2-D RT TO 3-D CRT AND IMRT

Automated Plan Quality Check with Scripting. Rajesh Gutti, Ph.D. Clinical Medical Physicist

Clinical Quality Assurance for Particle Therapy Plus ça même Plus

A Comparison of IMRT and VMAT Technique for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer

2 Diagnosis and Staging of Cancer 2.1 Pathophysiology of cancer 2.2 Classification and staging 2.3 Diagnostic measures for specific cancer types

2015 Radiology Coding Survival Guide

Risk analysis to inform physics plan review recommendations

Completion of Treatment Planning. Eugene Lief, Ph.D. Christ Hospital Jersey City, New Jersey USA

Understanding Radiation Therapy. For Patients and the Public

CODING GUIDELINES. Radiation Therapy. Effective January 1, 2019

What Can Go Wrong in Radiation Treatment: Data from the RPC. Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

How ICD-10 Affects Radiation Oncology. Presented by, Lashelle Bolton CPC, COC, CPC-I, CPMA

The Smart Way to Check Treatment Plans and Charts. Anne W. Greener, Ph.D., FACR American Association Of Medical Dosimetrists June 15, 2016

NIA MAGELLAN HEALTH RADIATION ONCOLOGY CODING STANDARD. Dosimetry Planning

Varian Treatment. Streamlined Treatment Delivery Management Application. Specifications

Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy. Technical Quality Control Guidelines for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery. A guidance document on behalf of:

THE TRANSITION FROM 2D TO 3D AND TO IMRT - RATIONALE AND CRITICAL ELEMENTS

Original Date: April 2016 Page 1 of 7 FOR CMS (MEDICARE) MEMBERS ONLY

LA GESTIONE DELLE NUOVE TECNOLOGIE Cinzia Iotti. Azienda Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova IRCCS Reggio Emilia

Head and Neck Service

Brachytherapy. What is brachytherapy and how is it used?

QA for Clinical Dosimetry with Emphasis on Clinical Trials

FEE RULES RADIATION ONCOLOGY FEE SCHEDULE CONTENTS

Defining Target Volumes and Organs at Risk: a common language

A Handbook for Families. Radiation. Therapy ONCOLOGY SERIES

Sample UC Irvine Medical Dosimetry Program Official Transcript

Regions Hospital Delineation of Privileges Radiation Oncology

Panel consensus was not to include suggested revision.

Making a Difference. Highest quality care. Education. Research. Innovation. OUR MISSION:

A Patient s Guide to SRS

Implementing New Technologies for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: GRID Sponsored by.decimal Friday, August 22, Pamela Myers, Ph.D.

8/2/2017. Acknowledgement. Disclaimer. How to manage radiotherapy patients with CIED from initial consult to treatment: TG203 recommendations

Specification of Tumor Dose. Prescription dose. Purpose

Corporate Medical Policy

Evaluation of Monaco treatment planning system for hypofractionated stereotactic volumetric arc radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases

Special Procedures Rotation I/II SBRT, SRS, TBI, and TSET

Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Extracranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Linear accelerators. Basic technique. Indications of SRS

Medical Events. Florida Department of Health Division of Emergency Preparedness and Community Support Bureau of Radiation Control

Quality assurance and credentialing requirements for sites using inverse planned IMRT Techniques

This LCD recognizes these two distinct treatment approaches and is specific to treatment delivery:

Using Event Reporting to Improve Patient Safety SAMs Session

IGRT Solution for the Living Patient and the Dynamic Treatment Problem

6/29/2012 WHAT IS IN THIS PRESENTATION? MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY DEVICES INVESTIGATED MAJOR ISSUES WITH CARDIAC DEVICES AND FROM MED PHYS LISTSERVS

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSORTIUM (ATC) CREDENTIALING PROCEDURES FOR LUNG BRACHYTHERAPY IMPLANT PROTOCOLS

Radiotherapy and tumours in veterinary practice: part one

Patient-Specific QA & QA Process. Sasa Mutic, Ph.D. Washington University School of Medicine

Sarcoma and Radiation Therapy. Gabrielle M Kane MB BCh EdD FRCPC Muir Professorship in Radiation Oncology University of Washington

Bone Metastases Radiation Therapy Physician Worksheet Pages 2-5. Brain Metastases Radiation Therapy Physician Worksheet Pages 6-9

First, how does radiation work?

External Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

IMRT - Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

I. Equipments for external beam radiotherapy

Acknowledgments. Introduction. Managing the Care of Radiotherapy Patients Implanted with Cardiac Devices. Outline

Medicare Program: Changes to Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems and Quality Reporting Programs

CBCT of the patient in the treatment position has gained wider applications for setup verification during radiotherapy.

Brachytherapy Planning and Quality Assurance w Classical implant systems and modern computerized dosimetry w Most common clinical applications w

SUPERIORITY OF A REAL TIME PLANNING TECHNIQUE OVER IMAGE GUIDED RADIATION THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY PROSTATE CANCERS

Innovative RT SBRT. The variables with REQ in superscript are required.

Patient Safety in the Age of Big Data

Brachytherapy Planning and Quality Assurance

Corporate Medical Policy

Small field dosimetry, an example of what a Medical Physicist does (& some more examples) A/PROF SCOTT CROWE MEDICAL PHYSICIST

IPEM Recommendations for the Provision of a Physics Service to Radiotherapy

Linac or Non-Linac Demystifying And Decoding The Physics Of SBRT/SABR

The RPC s Evaluation of Advanced Technologies. AAPM Refresher Course July 29, 2008 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

Risk-based QM for Incorrect Isocenter at Day 1 Setup. TG 100 risk based QM development Process Mapping

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)

Report on Radiation Disaster Recovery Studies

Chapters from Clinical Oncology

Objectives. Image-Guided RT: Process. kv CBCT Novel Clinical Applications and Future Directions. Standard Clinical Uses. Novel Applications.

MEDICAL MANAGEMENT POLICY

Elekta MOSAIQ and Philips Pinnacle

Table 1 Standards and items to set up a PCU: general requirements and critical mass

State of the Art Radiotherapy for Pediatric Tumors. Suzanne L. Wolden, MD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

REVISITING ICRU VOLUME DEFINITIONS. Eduardo Rosenblatt Vienna, Austria

COURSE CONTENTS STUDY HOURS (Theory +Practical) A. Radiation Detectors 4+8

3D CONFORMATIONAL INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY PLANNING FOR SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA

Varian Acuity BrachyTherapy Suite One Room Integrated Image-Guided Brachytherapy

8/2/2018. Disclosure. Online MR-IG-ART Dosimetry and Dose Accumulation

7/10/2015. Acknowledgments. Institution-specific TG-142? AAPM:Task Group-142. Failure-Mode & Effects Analysis

RADIOTHERAPY DEPARTMENT

ACR ASTRO PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY

Quality assurance in external radiotherapy

SBRT fundamentals. Outline 8/2/2012. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Educational Session

Transcription:

Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) National System for Incident Reporting in Radiation Therapy (NSIR-RT) National System for Incident Reporting in Radiation Therapy (NSIR-RT) Taxonomy Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists Canadian Partnership Against Cancer Canadian Institute of Health Information February 2, 2015 TAX.2015.01.01

2

Taxonomy Data Element Number Description Table 1: NSIR-RT Data Elements Data Fields and Menu Choices 1. Impact 1.1 Incident description Free text 1.2 Incident type Actual incident: Reached the patient, with or without harm Near miss: Detected before reaching the patient Reportable circumstance: Hazard not involving a patient 1.3 Acute medical harm (Adapted from the WHO-ICPS) Not applicable: Near miss or reportable circumstance None: Patient is asymptomatic and no treatment is required Mild: Symptoms if present are mild; no or minimal intervention (observation, investigation, minor treatment) is required; harm or loss of function is minimal, or intermediate but short term Moderate: Patient is symptomatic requiring intervention (additional treatment or operative procedure) or a prolonged hospital stay; long term or permanent harm or loss of function Severe: Patient is symptomatic requiring life-saving intervention or a major surgical/medical intervention; shortened life expectancy, or major long term or permanent harm or loss of function Death: On the balance of probabilities, death was caused or brought forward in the short term by the incident. 1.4 Dosimetric severity Not applicable: Near miss or reportable circumstance Minor: 5% tumour underdose or OAR overdose, relative to the intended doses to these structures over the course of treatment Moderate: >5% and 25% tumour underdose or OAR overdose, relative to the intended doses to these structures over the course of treatment Severe: >25% tumour underdose or OAR overdose, relative to the intended doses to these structures over the course of treatment 1.5 Latent medical harm Not applicable: Near miss or reportable circumstance 3

Yes: On the balance of probabilities, the incident is likely to be associated with the development of significant late medical harm. No: On the balance of probabilities, the incident is unlikely to be associated with the development of significant late medical harm. 2. Discovery 2.1 Functional work area Field to be customized for individual programs 2.2 Date incident was detected DD:MMM:YYYY 2.3 Date incident occurred DD:MMM:YYYY 2.4 Time or time period when the incident was detected 2.5 Time or time period when the incident occurred 2.6 Health care provider(s) and/or other individual(s) who detected the incident HH:MM 00:00-3:59 04:00-07:59 8:00-11:59 12:00-15:59 16:00-19:59 20:00-23:59 HH:MM 00:00-3:59 04:00-07:59 8:00-11:59 12:00-15:59 16:00-19:59 20:00-23:59 Radiation therapist Treatment planner or dosimetrist Medical physicist Radiation oncologist Radiation oncology resident or fellow 4

(Multiple selections as warranted) 2.7 Health care provider(s) and/or other individuals(s) involved in the incident (Multiple selections as warranted) 3.1 Patient year of birth YYYY 3.2 Patient month of birth MM 3.3 Patient gender Male Female Undifferentiated Unspecified 3.4 Diagnosis relevant to treatment Staff doing technical maintenance Nurse or physician assistant Non-MD student or trainee Administrator Patient or family member Radiation therapist Treatment planner or dosimetrist Medical physicist Radiation oncologist Radiation oncology resident or fellow Staff doing technical maintenance Nurse or physician assistant Non-MD student or trainee Administrator Patient or family member 3. Patient Breast cancer Central nervous system tumors Gastrointestinal cancer Genitourinary cancer Gynecological cancer Lymphoma or leukemia 5

4.1 step where the incident occurred 4.2 step where the incident was detected 4.3 Problem type (Single descriptor that best characterizes the incident) Melanoma/Non-melanoma skin cancer Sarcoma Thoracic malignancy Benign 4. Details Patient assessment/consultation Imaging for radiotherapy planning Treatment planning Pre-treatment review and verification Treatment delivery On-treatment quality Post-treatment completion Patient assessment/consultation Imaging for radiotherapy planning Treatment planning Pre-treatment review and verification Treatment delivery On-treatment quality Post-treatment completion Adverse Event Allergic reaction Adverse Event Break in sterile technique Adverse Event Patient fall or injury Adverse Event Equipment collision Adverse Event Equipment malfunction Accessory Incorrect bolus Accessory Incorrect immobilization device Accessory Incorrect shielding/mlc Accessory Incorrect accessory tray Accessory Incorrect electron accessories 6

4.4 Contributing factors (Multiple selections as warranted) Accessory Accessory Documentation Documentation Documentation Documentation Documentation Dose Dose Dose Dose Treatment volume Treatment volume Treatment volume Treatment volume Treatment volume Treatment volume Treatment volume Imaging Imaging Imaging Scheduling Scheduling Fiducial markers Couch Incorrect treatment plan Incorrect setup instructions Incorrect treatment delivery parameters Incorrect record of treatment Missing or incomplete documentation Incorrect prescription Incorrect plan dose Calibration error Calculation error Incorrect patient Incorrect anatomical site Incorrect side (laterality) Incorrect target or OAR contours, or incorrect planning margins Incorrect patient positioning Incorrect shift from setup point Patient movement during simulation or treatment Incorrect simulation imaging Incorrect image fusion Incorrect on-treatment imaging Radiation treatment scheduling error Combined modality treatment scheduling error (concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy) Programmatic resources Training Communication 7

Documentation Policies, procedures, regulations - Inadequate Policies, procedures, regulations Not followed Environment - Competing demands Environment - Inadequate safety culture Environment Not conducive to safety Environment - Physical environment Leadership - Inadequate supervision Failure to detect - Expectation bias Failure to detect - Non- standard technique Failure to detect - Distraction, loss of attention Failure to interpret - Missing information Failure to interpret - Incorrect information Failure to interpret - Information misinterpreted Failure to navigate - Information not seen or sought, inappropriate assumptions Failure to navigate - Mistaken options Failure to execute - Plan forgotten in progress Failure to execute - Inadequate of change Failure to execute - Incomplete, invalid, or faulty rule Technical Acceptance testing and commissioning Technical Equipment issues Patient-related circumstances Factors beyond facility control 4.5 0 (Reportable circumstance) 8

Number of patients affected 1 More than 1 5. Delivery 5.1 Radiation treatment technique (Multiple selections as warranted) External beam photon radiotherapy - Simple External beam photon radiotherapy - 3D conformal External beam photon radiotherapy - IMRT External beam photon radiotherapy - SRS External beam photon radiotherapy - SBRT External beam photon radiotherapy - Modulated arc therapy External beam photon radiotherapy - Orthovoltage External beam electron radiotherapy Brachytherapy - Intracranial, intraluminal, intravascular, surface Brachytherapy - Interstitial Brachytherapy LDR Brachytherapy PDR Brachytherapy HDR Brachytherapy - Temporary implant Brachytherapy - Permanent implant 5.2 Total dose prescribed NN.NN Gy Not applicable 5.3 Number of fractions prescribed NN Fractions Not applicable 5.4 Number of fractions delivered incorrectly NN Fractions Not applicable 5.5 Hardware involved (if relevant) Yes (Free text - specify manufacturer and model) No 5.6 Software involved (if relevant) Yes (Free text - specify manufacturer and model) No 5.7 Body region(s) treated Brain Spine Head and neck 9

(Multiple selections as warranted) Thorax Abdomen Pelvis Upper extremity Lower extremity Skin 5.8 Treatment intent Curative (Radical) Palliative 6.1 Ameliorating actions (to make better or compensate harm after an incident) 6.2 Safety barrier(s) that failed to prevent the incident (Multiple selections as warranted) 6. Investigation Free text apologize, clinical of an injury, radiation treatment replanning, change in prescription dose-fractionation, staff debriefing, culture change Verification of patient ID Verification that all relevant clinical information (diagnosis and staging, comorbid conditions, pacemaker, defibrillator, prior RT) were taken into account Verification of imaging data for planning (appropriate imaging, image fusion, correct image data set(s)) Verification of reference points Oncologist peer review Radiation therapist review of treatment plan Physicist review of treatment plan Oncologist review of treatment plan Independent confirmation of dose Time out/verbalization/call-back Verification of treatment accessories Regular chart check Intra-treatment monitoring (audio/visual, motion tracking) Regular on-treatment clinical (physician) assessment Post-treatment assessment 10

6.3 Safety barrier(s) that prevented the incident (Multiple selections as warranted) None Regular internal audit Pacemaker or implantable devices check Pregnancy check Informed consent Laterality check Use of record and verifying system Image-based position verification Image-based accessory verification Independent review of commissioning Equipment protection system (collision detection devices) Emergency shutdown Interlocks Regular equipment performance verification Regular external audit Verification of patient ID Verification that all relevant clinical information (diagnosis and staging, comorbid conditions, pacemaker, defibrillator, prior RT) were taken into account Verification of imaging data for planning (appropriate imaging, image fusion, correct image data set(s)) Verification of reference points Oncologist peer review Radiation therapist review of treatment plan Physicist review of treatment plan Oncologist review of treatment plan Independent confirmation of dose Time out/verbalization/call-back Verification of treatment accessories Regular chart check Intra-treatment monitoring (audio/visual, motion tracking) Regular on-treatment clinical (physician) assessment 11

6.4 Actions taken or planned to reduce risk, and other recommendations None Free text Post-treatment assessment Regular internal audit Pacemaker or implantable devices check Pregnancy check Informed consent Laterality check Use of record and verifying system Image-based position verification Image-based accessory verification Independent review of commissioning Equipment protection system (collision detection devices) Emergency shutdown Interlocks Regular equipment performance verification Regular external audit WHO-ICPS World Health Organization Conceptual Framework for the International Classification of Patient Safety 12

Table 2: NSIR-RT Mandatory and Optional Reporting Requirement Number Taxonomy Data Element Description Actual Incident Near Miss Reportable Circumstance 1. Impact 1.1 Incident description Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 1.2 Incident type Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 1.3 Acute medical harm Mandatory Not applicable Not applicable 1.4 Dosimetric severity Mandatory Not applicable Not applicable 1.5 Latent medical harm Mandatory Not applicable Not applicable 2. Discovery 2.1 Functional work area Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 2.2 Date - detected Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 2.3 Date - occurred Optional Optional Optional 2.4 Time - detection Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 2.5 Time - occurred Optional Optional Optional 2.6 Health care provider(s) - detected Optional Optional Optional 2.7 Health care provider(s) - involved Optional Optional Optional 3. Patient 3.1 Patient year of birth Optional Optional Not applicable 3.2 Patient month of birth Optional Optional Not applicable 3.3 Patient gender Mandatory Optional Not applicable 3.4 Diagnosis relevant to treatment Mandatory Mandatory Not applicable 4. Details 4.1 step - occurred Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 13

4.2 step - detected Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 4.3 Problem type Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 4.4 Contributing factors Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 4.5 Number of patients affected Mandatory Not applicable Not applicable 5. Delivery 5.1 Radiation treatment technique Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory 5.2 Total dose prescribed Mandatory Mandatory Not applicable 5.3 Number of fractions prescribed Mandatory Mandatory Not applicable 5.4 Number of fractions delivered incorrectly Mandatory Not applicable Not applicable 5.5 Hardware involved Mandatory (if relevant) Mandatory (if relevant) Mandatory (if relevant) 5.6 Software involved Mandatory (if relevant) Mandatory (if relevant) Mandatory (if relevant) 5.7 Body region(s) treated Mandatory Optional Not applicable 5.8 Treatment intent Optional Optional Not applicable 6. Investigation 6.1 Ameliorating actions Mandatory Mandatory Optional 6.2 Safety barriers - failed Mandatory Mandatory Optional 6.3 Safety barriers - detected Mandatory Mandatory Optional 6.4 Actions and recommendations Optional Optional Optional 14