Results and Treatment Strategy for Patients Undergoing Emergent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Similar documents
Emergency surgery in acute coronary syndrome

University of Florida Department of Surgery. CardioThoracic Surgery VA Learning Objectives

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Setting The setting was a hospital. The economic study was carried out in Australia.

Declaration of conflict of interest NONE

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

TSDA ACGME Milestones

The Influence of Previous Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Off-Pump Cardiac Surgery is not Dead

Intraoperative application of Cytosorb in cardiac surgery

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for left anterior descending artery revascularization analysis of 300 cases

OPCAB IS NOT BETTER THAN CONVENTIONAL CABG

Ischemic Ventricular Septal Rupture

Case Report Left Main Stenosis. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)?

EACTS Adult Cardiac Database

Assessing Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery. Murali Sivarajan, M.D. Professor University of Washington Seattle, Washington

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT (CABG) MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Cardiovascular Nursing Practice: A Comprehensive Resource Manual and Study Guide for Clinical Nurses 2 nd Edition

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Myocardial enzyme release after standard coronary artery bypass grafting

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

Useful? Definition of High-risk? Pre-OP/Intra-OP/Post-OP? Complication vs Benefit? Mortality? Morbidity?

Indications of Coronary Angiography Dr. Shaheer K. George, M.D Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University 2014

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

Percutaneous Cardiopulmonary Support after Acute Myocardial Infarction at the Left Main Trunk

ESC Congress 2011 SIMULTANEOUS HYBRID REVASCULARIZATION OF CAROTID AND CORONARY DISEASE INITIAL RESULTS OF A NEW THERAPEUTIC APPROACH

Daryoush Samim, Enrico Ferrari, MD, FETCS, PD&MER

Conventional CABG Or On Pump Beating Heart: A Difference In Myocardial Injury?

The Case for Multivessel Revascularization in Shock

FastTest. You ve read the book now test yourself

Images have been removed from the PowerPoint slides in this handout due to copyright restrictions.

Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest. Franz R. Eberli MD, FESC, FAHA Cardiology Triemli Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

Clopidogrel Date: 15 July 2008

The development of cardiogenic shock portends an extremely poor prognosis. Cardiogenic Shock: A Lethal Complication of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Extra Corporeal Life Support for Acute Heart failure

Risk Stratification Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Program

Repair or Replacement

Does the Presence of Preoperative Mild or Moderate Coronary Artery Disease Affect the Outcomes of Lung Transplantation?

Is bypass surgery needed for elderly patients with LMT disease? From the surgical point of view

CABG in the Post-Aprotinin Era: Are We Doing Better? Ziv Beckerman, David Kadosh, Zvi Peled, Keren Bitton-Worms, Oved Cohen and Gil Bolotin

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT

Final published version:

Distal Coronary Artery Dissection Following Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

Acute heart failure: ECMO Cardiology & Vascular Medicine 2012

Preoperative Anemia versus Blood Transfusion: Which is the Culprit for Worse Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery?

Yes No Unknown. Major Infection Information

Alex versus Xience Registry Preliminary report

Ted Feldman, M.D., MSCAI FACC FESC

Cardiogenic Shock. Carlos Cafri,, MD

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research

Downloaded from:

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Peripheral Vascular Disease and Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Acute Myocardial Infarction. Willis E. Godin D.O., FACC

Kinsing Ko, Thom de Kroon, Najim Kaoui, Bart van Putte, Nabil Saouti. St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

A Novel Score to Estimate the Risk of Pneumonia After Cardiac Surgery

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

CABG Surgery following STEMI

Robotic Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Analysis of Early And Late Outcomes

Supplementary material 1. Definitions of study endpoints (extracted from the Endpoint Validation Committee Charter) 1.

From Recovery to Transplant: One Patient's Journey

388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, , Republic of Korea b Department of Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore

Management of Cardiogenic shock. Prof. Christian JM Vrints

SURGICAL MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION: ARTERIAL VS VENOUS GRAFTS, SINGLE VS MULTIPLE GRAFTS?

Disclosures The PREVENT IV Trial was supported by Corgentech and Bristol-Myers Squibb

Quality Measures MIPS CV Specific

Zachary I. Hodes, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.C.

PERIOPERATIVE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION THE ANAESTHESIOLOGIST'S VIEW

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 37, No. 2, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /01/$20.

'Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndromes: perioperative strategies to improve outcome'

Alfa Ferry FRCS Cardiac Surgeon OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease remains the number

Cardiovascular Health Nova Scotia Update to Antiplatelet Sections of the Nova Scotia Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndromes, 2008.

Cardiothoracic Fellow Expectations Division of Cardiac Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Analysis of Mortality Within the First Six Months After Coronary Reoperation

8/28/2018. Pre-op Evaluation for non cardiac surgery. A quick review from 2007!! Disclosures. John Steuter, MD. None

Contrast Induced Nephropathy

A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Strategy in Patients with Non-ST Elevation ACS

Cardiology/Cardiothoracic

University of Wisconsin - Madison Cardiovascular Medicine Fellowship Program UW CICU Rotation Goals and Objectives

SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL NURSING DEPARTMENT POLICY

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Bicuspid aortic root spared during ascending aorta surgery: an update of long-term results

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without an

On-Pump Beating-Heart Coronary Artery Bypass: A Propensity Matched Analysis

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Alexander M. Bernhardt a, *, Theo M.M.H. De By b, Hermann Reichenspurner a and Tobias Deuse a. Abstract INTRODUCTION

Prolonged Oral Morphine Therapy for Severe Angina Pectoris

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

Counterpulsation. John N. Nanas, MD, PhD. Professor and Head, 3 rd Cardiology Dept, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation- Supportive Data for a Role in Cardiogenic Shock ( Be Still My Friend )

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

Supplementary Online Content

Management of Cardiogenic Shock. Dr Stephen Pettit, Consultant Cardiologist

New Double Stent Technique

1/3/2008. Karen Burke Priscilla LeMone Elaine Mohn-Brown. Medical-Surgical Nursing Care, 2e Karen Burke, Priscilla LeMone, and Elaine Mohn-Brown

Does Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement?

Transcription:

Original Article Results and Treatment Strategy for Patients Undergoing Emergent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Stefan Christiansen, MD, and Rüdiger Autschbach, MD Background: Emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a high-risk procedure in cardiac surgery. Therefore we performed this study to evaluate its current results. Methods: From 2001 to 2007, fifty-seven patients with an acute coronary syndrome underwent an isolated CABG procedure emergently. Data were collected retrospectively from the patients charts. Results: The mean age of the patients, 45 males (79%) and 12 females (21%), was 64.5 ± 11.5 years. Operations were performed on 40 patients (70%) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegic cardiac arrest and on 6 without CPB. Eleven patients (11%) underwent on-pump beating heart procedures (19%). The operating times (minutes) were duration of surgery 215.2 ± 64.2; duration of CPB 116.9 ± 51.5; and X-clamp time 57.3 ± 19.9. The mean number of grafts per patient was 2.95 ± 0.97. Postoperative durations of mechanical ventilation (hours), Intensive Care Unit stay (days), and normal ward stay (days) were 45.8 ± 75.3, 8.9 ± 23.1, and 9.6 ± 8.0, respectively. The total number of complications was 57, and postoperative confusion (29.8%), revision for bleeding (22.8%), and renal insufficiency (21%) occurred most frequently. Seven of the 57 patients died: 5 succumbed to multiorgan failures, 1 to cardiac decompensation, and 1 to bleeding complications. Conclusion: Emergent CABG is associated with an enhanced perioperative risk, and further developments are absolutely necessary to improve its results. (Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 16: 168 173) Key words: coronary artery bypass grafting, emergent surgery Introduction Despite great progress in the conservative and interventional treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes, in Germany the percentage of patients still dying from this problem ranges from 5% to 10%. Within the next year, 25% of male patients and 38% of female patients Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany Received December 12, 2008; accepted for publication March 30, 2010 Address reprint requests to PD Dr. med. S. Christiansen: Auf dem Wall 14, 52457 Aldenhoven, Germany. 2010 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights reserved. will not live through the consequences of this event. 1) Therefore the major goal in these patients remains the revascularization of the ischemic myocardium to lower the mortality and to improve long-term survival. The last therapeutic option for patients with ongoing angina pectoris, despite maximal conservative and interventional therapy, is operative revascularization. This procedure, which must be performed on an emergent basis, is associated with an increased risk compared with elective operations. Therefore we performed this study to evaluate the perioperative risk of emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to discuss the optimal treatment strategy for this high-risk patient group. 168 Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 16, No. 3 (2010)

Emergent CABG Materials and Methods From 2001 to 2007, a total of 57 patients with acute coronary syndrome were operated emergently in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery of the University of Aachen. Emergent surgery means that all these patients underwent CABG within 2 hours after admission to our department because of ongoing angina, despite optimal conservative and interventional treatment. Twenty-eight patients (49%) suffered from an acute ST elevation myocardial infarction, whereas the remaining 29 had acute coronary syndromes with no changes in the electrocardiogram. All patients underwent an isolated CABG procedure; patients with a simultaneous procedure (for example, valve surgery) or who had previously experienced a cardiac operation were excluded from the study. Data were collected retrospectively from the patient s charts and are presented as mean value and standard deviation of the mean. Results Table 1. Concomitant diseases Number of patients Percentage Arterial hypertension 49 86 Previous myocardial infarction 38 67 Hyperlipidemia 37 65 Nicotine abuse 32 56 Diabetes mellitus 11 19 Acute cardiac decompensation 9 16 Peripheral arterial occlusive disease 8 14 Previous cerebral infarction 2 4 Table 1 demonstrates that the most common concomitant disease was arterial hypertension, followed by previous myocardial infarction and hyperlipidemia. Preoperative data The mean age of these patients was 64.5 ± 11.5 years at the time of surgery. The number of male patients was 45 (79%) and of female patients 12 (21%). The mean body mass index was slightly enhanced (27.5 ± 4.2 kg/m 2 ), whereas the ejection fraction was somewhat decreased (56.9 ± 20.4%). Table 1 presents the concomitant diseases of the patients. Forty patients (70%) suffered from a 3-vessel disease, 14 (25%) from a 2-vessel disease, and 3 (5%) from a singlevessel disease. All patients were evaluated for percutaneous coronary intervention. This treatment failed in 15 patients (26%, unsuccessful percutaneous transluminal coronary Table 2. Preoperative anticoagulation management Number of patients Percentage Heparin 42 74 acetylsalicylic acid 42 74 clopidogrel 28 49 glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors 19 33 phenprocoumon 1 2 Table 2 clearly shows that nearly all patients were treated with a combination of anticoagulative drugs, indicating the severity of the disease in this patient cohort. angioplasty or failed stent implantation); thus these patients were referred directly to cardiac surgery from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The remaining 42 patients suffered from a left main stenosis or an advanced coronary artery disease (serial high-grade stenoses or a diffuse coronary artery disease). Thus the anatomy was evaluated as being unsuitable for an interventional procedure from the cardiologists. Four patients had to be supported by an intra-aortic balloon pump for ongoing angina pectoris, despite maximal conservative therapy. These four received the pump while in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and were therefore referred to the operating room in that condition. Two of these patients were already intubated and treated with catecholamines because of hemodynamic instability. Three other patients could be stabilized by intravenous catecholamine administration. The preoperative anticoagulation management is shown in Table 2. Operative data All patients were operated on via a median sternotomy. Cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic cardiac arrest (Bretschneider s solution) was used in 40 patients (70%). Eleven patients underwent an on-pump beating heart procedure (19%), and 6 had operations without cardiopulmonary bypass (11%). All patients having operations without cardiopulmonary bypass received an intra-aortic balloon pump routinely before skin incision to secure hemodynamic stability during the phases of cardiac displacement. In two patients, weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass was not possible despite catecholamine support and implantation of an intra-aortic pump, making an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implan ta tion necessary. Table 3 presents the durations of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross-clamping. The number of bypass grafts is shown in Table 4. Intraoperative anticoagulation was performed with Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 16, No. 3 (2010) 169

Christiansen and Autschbach Table 3. Operating times Duration of surgery (minutes) 215.2 ± 64.2 Duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (minutes) 116.9 ± 51.5 X-clamp time (minutes) 57.3 ± 19.9 It should be considered that the number of patients is 57 for the duration of the operation, 51 for the duration of the cardiopulmonary bypass, and 40 for the X-clamp time. heparin. The activated coagulation time was adjusted to > 400 seconds in patients operated on with cardiopulmonary bypass and to > 300 seconds in those operated on without it. After termination of cardiopulmonary bypass or completion of bypass grafts, the heparin effect was reversed by protamine. In patients who received phenprocoumon preoperatively, the prothrombin time was increased to above 50% by using fresh frozen plasma or PPSB (containing coagulation factors II, VII, IX, and X in very high concentrations) if the effect of fresh frozen plasmas was insufficient. If the drainage loss was less than 100 ml per hour for more than six hours postoperatively, all patients received acetylsalicylic acid. Those with highly progredient coronary artery disease or a coronary stent also received clopidogrel. Patients with a preoperative phenprocoumon therapy were also treated with phenprocoumon postoperatively after removal of the chest tubes. Postoperative data The most important postoperative data and complications are given in Tables 5 and 6. Postoperative cardiac arrhythmias were detected in 26 patients (45.6%). Twelve (21%) suffered from a tachyarrhythmia absoluta (atrial fibrillation > 100 bpm) and 6 from ventricular extrasystoles (11%), which could be treated conservatively. Four patients had a third-degree atrioventricular block (7%) and two had bradycardias (3.5%), which required temporary pacemaker stimulation. Two patients (7%) developed ventricular fibrillation postoperatively, which in one was treated successfully by cardiac defibrillation. An intraoperative myocardial infarction could not be clearly detected. As shown in Fig. 1, the CK-MB fraction was already increased significantly before surgery (14%, day -1) and declined continuously in the postoperative course. This indicates that the extent of the myocardial damage was more dependent on the preoperative situation than on the operative myocardial injury. Seven of the 57 patients died postoperatively. Five suc- Table 4. Number of bypass grafts Number of patients Percentage One graft 1 1.8 Two grafts 19 33.3 Three grafts 23 40.3 Four grafts 11 19.3 Five grafts 2 3.5 Six grafts 1 1.8 All grafts were performed as single grafts. The mean number of grafts per patient was 2.95 ± 0.97. The left internal thoracic artery was used in 44 patients (77%) as a graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery; the other grafts were performed with segments of the greater saphenous vein. cumbed to multiorgan failure, 1 could not be resuscitated after a cardiac decompensation resulting in ventricular fibrillation, and 1 died because of hemodynamic instability that occurred during a revision for a retroperitoneal bleeding complication. Discussion In 1999, Hochman et al. 2) demonstrated that an early revascularization (CABG or PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention) of patients with an acute myocardial infarction complicated by a cardiogenic shock does not reduce the overall mortality at 30 days, but it significantly improves midterm survival at six months. Six years later, White et al. 3) presented a more detailed analysis of the subgroup of patients who underwent an early revascularization and compared them with CABG and PCI. The authors found no significant difference of survival after 30 days or after 1 year. However, patients undergoing CABG suffered from more-severe coronary artery disease (for example: occlusion of the left main stem 41.3% vs. 13.0%, and 3-vessel-disease 80.4% vs. 60.3%) and more frequently demonstrated diabetes mellitus (48.9% vs. 26.9%). These results may lead to the assumption that long-term results of CABG would be better than after PCI if both patient groups were comparable. This problem was addressed by a study that Toda et al. conducted. 4) They compared the results of CABG and PCI in patients with ischemic heart disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction and concluded that CABG achieved a more complete revascularization and improved left ventricular function, and also that it led to fewer cardiac events and reinterventions after three years. Taking everything into account, Makuuchi. 5) defined the indications for PCI and CABG as follows: PCI is the 170 Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 16, No. 3 (2010)

Emergent CABG Table 5. Postoperative data Duration of mechanical ventilation (hours) 45.8 ± 75.3 Stay on the Intensive Care Unit (days) 8.9 ± 23.1 Stay on the normal ward (days) 9.6 ± 8.0 Blood loss (ml) 1232 ± 1015 Transfused Packed red blood cells 5.4 ± 7.3 Transfused Fresh frozen plasma 2.5 ± 5.0 Transfused Platelet concentrates 0.9 ± 2.3 Regarding Table 5, the high standard deviation for all parameters is striking. Especially the times for postoperative ventilation and stay on the intensive care unit are prolonged by some patients who suffered from serious postoperative complications and ultimately died. The values of drainage loss and number of applied blood products are caused by numerous patients who received no transfusions and had a low drainage loss, and by some patients who had a very high drainage loss and received many blood products (especially the patients who had to be revised for a bleeding complication). Altogether, 44 patients (77%) received packed red blood cells, but only 21 (37%) received fresh frozen plasmas, and 18 (32%) received platelet concentrates. therapy of choice for acute coronary syndromes, especially when the patient is in cardiogenic shock. In cases of acute myocardial infarction, emergent CABG is indicated when a left main trunk lesion or severe triple-vessel disease remains after PCI combined with residual or recurrent ischemic angina and/or ST changes in the electrocardiogram. Similarly, in cases of unstable angina, emergent CABG is indicated when a left main trunk lesion or a left main trunk equivalent (proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery and the circumflex branch) is the culprit lesion or when severe triple-vessel disease exists. On the other hand, emergent operation and existence of cardiogenic shock are the major perioperative risk factors for CABG in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Because employment of a cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest greatly contribute to surgical mortality, less-invasive operative strategies such as on-pump beating heart and off-pump surgery have become more popular in recent years. 5) Various studies tried to address the question of whether these less-invasive procedures result in an improved outcome of patients with emergent CABG. Rastan et al. 6) demonstrated that patients undergoing on- and off-pump beating heart surgeries had lower drainage losses, a reduced need for transfusions, a shorter duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit, and a decreased frequency of cerebral infarctions. This led to better in-hospital results Table 6. Postoperative complications Number of Percentage patients Postoperative confusion 17 29.8 Revision for bleeding 13 22.8 Renal insufficiency 12 21 Need for IABP insertion intraoperatively 8 14 Need for an ECMO intraoperatively 2 3.5 Superficial wound healing disturbance 2 3.5 Mediastinitis 2 3.5 Cerebral infarction 1 1.8 The postoperative confusion was successfully treated by drugs in all patients. The 13 revisions for bleeding were performed in 10 patients. The reasons were a diffuse bleeding tendency for 9 revisions (mediastinal hematoma: 5 patients; left-sided hemothorax: 2 patients; retroperitoneal bleeding after IABP [intra-aortic balloon pump] insertion: 2 patients) and a pericardial tamponade 4 times. All patients who had to be revised for bleeding complications received more than one anticoagulative drug preoperatively. Five of the 12 patients with postoperative renal insufficiency already had an impaired renal function preoperatively. Eleven had to undergo a temporary dialysis, but renal function recovered to the preoperative status in the surviving patients. The superficial wound-healing disturbances could be treated conservatively, whereas the 2 patients suffering from a mediastinitis had to be treated surgically. ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Fig. 1. Perioperative course of the CK-MB fraction (CK-MB divided by CK in percent) for these patients, which might be explained by less myocardial damage when the use of cardioplegic solution, and possibly also cardiopulmonary bypass, is avoided. 7) But the overall survival and the frequency of cardiac events as well as reinterventions were comparable at five Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 16, No. 3 (2010) 171

Christiansen and Autschbach years. Similar results were reported by other authors. 8,9) But off-pump CABG, which leads to the lowest myocardial damage, is difficult to perform when the hemodynamic state is unstable. 5) Therefore it was thought that the development of miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass systems 10,11) would solve this problem. First reports demonstrated that the inflammatory response was reduced with miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass systems as a result of the decreased hemodilution (leading to lower requirements of blood transfusions) and limited air-blood contact. 12,13) Also, Fromes et al. 14) showed that miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass systems led to significantly lower Il-6 levels and significantly less increase of the TNF-Alpha. Unfortunately, however, Rex et al. 13) could not confirm these results. They failed to show a decreased release of the proinflammatory IL-6. Furthermore, only the conventional cardiopulmonary bypass system was associated with a significant increase in the release of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. 13) Therefore the primary enthusiasm regarding miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass systems has gone, and the question of which operative strategy is the best one for a certain patient remains. Until now, no consensus has remained concerning the precise indications for either off-pump or on-pump beating heart and for on-pump surgery with cardio plegic arrest. Some authors still prefer the conventional technique with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest for patients with left main stem disease and patients with 3-vessel disease. 3,6) But in general, the choice of surgical technique rests largely with the operating surgeon and his evaluation of the patient s condition. Lastly, the question of the true perioperative risk of emergent CABG remains. Many reports have addressed this problem, and mortality rates from 2.7% up to 42.6% are described. 3,15) The low mortality rate of the first study may be explained by their being only 37 patients involved, whereas the high mortality rate of the second study probably was caused by the severity of the disease (acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in all patients). Usually, mortality rates from 10.7% to 20.8% are reported for emergent CABG. 16-18) These rates are significantly increased when compared with elective CABG (1.4%, 17) ) but it must be considered that emergent CABG is always the last therapeutic option for severely ill patients. Therefore there is no other way than to accept this risk today, but efforts must proceed to reduce it. Conclusion Today, emergent CABG is an operative procedure with a significant increased risk that is markedly influenced by the preoperative status of the patient. Therefore great endeavors must be made to optimize the preoperative patient s condition and to reduce the operative invasiveness to improve the overall outcome of these high-risk patient groups. References 1. Leschke M. Akutes Koronarsyndrom. Klinikarzt 2005; 34: 90. 2. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Shock investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 625 34. 3. White HD, Assmann SF, Sanborn TA, Jacobs AK, Webb JG, et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock (SHOCK) trial. Circulation 2005; 112: 1992 2001. 4. Toda K, Mackenzie K, Mehra MR, DiCorte CJ, Davis JE, et al. Revascularization in severe ventricular dysfunction (15% < OR = LVEF < OR = 30%): a comparison of bypass grafting and percutaneous intervention. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 2082 7. 5. Makuuchi H. Acute coronary syndrome. Kyobu Geka 2004; 57: 663 70 (Suppl.). 6. Rastan AJ, Eckenstein JI, Hentschel B, Funkat AK, Gummert JF, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for acute coronary syndrome: beating heart versus conventional cardioplegic cardiac arrest strategies. Circulation 2006; 114: I477 85. 7. Rastan AJ, Bittner HB, Gummert JF, Walther T, Scheweick CV, et al. On-pump beating heart versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery-evidence of pumpinduced myocardial injury. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27: 1057 64. 8. Stamou SC, Hill PC, Haile E, Prince S, Mack MJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of nonelective coronary revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 28 33. 9. Kerendi F, Puskas JD, Craver JM, Cooper WA, Jones EL, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting can be performed safely without cardiopulmonary bypass in selected patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 801 6. 10. Christiansen S, Göbel C, Buhre W, Reul H, Autschbach R. Successful use of a miniaturized bypass system with the DeltaStreamR extracorporeal rotary blood pump. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 43 4. 172 Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 16, No. 3 (2010)

Emergent CABG 11. Christiansen S, Autschbach R. The CORx System for CABG. J Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 46: 90 1. 12. Remadi JR, Marticho P, Butoi I, Rakotoarivelo Z, Trojette F, et al. Clinical experience with the mini-extracorporeal circulation system: an evolution or a revolution? Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 2172 6. 13. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, de Rossi L, Schroth S, et al. Normothermic beating heart surgery with assistance of miniaturized bypass systems: the effects on intraoperative hemodynamics and inflammatory response. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 352 62. 14. Fromes Y, Gaillard D, Ponzio O, Chauffert M, Gerhardt MF, et al. Reduction of the inflammatory response following coronary bypass grafting with total minimal extracorporeal circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22: 527 33. 15. Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Endo M, Koyanagi H. Complete arterial revascularization in emergency CABG. Kyobu Geka 1999; 52: 688 92 (Suppl.). 16. Ozaki S, Toyama M, Ohashi T, Kawase I, Sekiguchi S. Emergent coronary bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction. Nippon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1996; 44: 2000 5. 17. Yoshitaka H, Hata T, Tsushima Y, Matsumoto M, Hamanaka S, et al. Clinical study of emergency coronary artery bypass surgery. Kyobu Geka 1999; 52: 658 61 (Suppl.). 18. Edwards FH, Bellamy RF, Burge JR, Cohen A, Thompson L, et al. True emergency coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49: 603 10. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Vol. 16, No. 3 (2010) 173