DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT

Similar documents
DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS SURVEY 2015/2

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS SURVEY 2015/3

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS SURVEY 2016/2

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS SURVEY 2016/3

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT

DEFINITIVE ANNUAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS CD34+ STEM CELL ENUMERATION 2014

DEFINITIVE ANNUAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS CD34+ STEM CELL ENUMERATION 2013

DEFINITIVE ANNUAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS CD34+ STEM CELL ENUMERATION 2015

Ex vivo Human Antigen-specific T Cell Proliferation and Degranulation Willemijn Hobo 1, Wieger Norde 1 and Harry Dolstra 2*

Original Article Time and temperature stability of T-cell subsets evaluated by a dual-platform method

Annexin V APC Assay Kit

Gladstone Institutes, University of California (UCSF), San Francisco, USA

ACS GUIDELINE FOR LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET IMMUNOPHENOTYPING. Second Edition Australasian Cytometry Society Guideline Document

How can Blood Stabilizers be used for Validation of New Instruments? UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping

Evaluation of a Method for Counting Absolute Numbers of Cells with a Flow Cytometer

UK NEQAS Low Level Leucocyte Enumeration Programme. Mr Matthew Fletcher Advanced Biomedical Scientist UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping

WHO Prequalification of Diagnostics Programme PUBLIC REPORT

Evaluation of a Single-Platform Technology for Lymphocyte Immunophenotyping

Applications for the MACSQuant Analyzer *

HSCT MANAGEMENT WHITE PAPER. Managing stem cell apheresis effectively

Application Information Bulletin: Human NK Cells Phenotypic characterizing of human Natural Killer (NK) cell populations in peripheral blood

Application Note. Productivity and Efficiency of 6-Color BD Multitest and BD Trucount Technologies for Enumeration of Lymphocyte Subsets

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL ANNUAL REPORT Molecular Biology Microbiology 2015

Both AABB and the Foundation for the Accreditation

BD Multitest IMK Kit

Human Progenitor Cell Enumeration by Flow Cytometry Practical Considerations

Original article. Key words: flow cytometry, acridine orange, residual white blood cells, leucocytes, and glutaraldehydefixed chicken red blood cells

a Beckman Coulter Life Sciences: White Paper

Technical Bulletin No. 157

Forum for Collaborative HIV Research External Validation of CD4 and Viral Load Assays Paris, France June 29, 2007

Nature Protocols: doi: /nprot Supplementary Figure 1

Hexagon PSA. Design Verification. Contents

Detailed step-by-step operating procedures for NK cell and CTL degranulation assays

Annexin V-APC/7-AAD Apoptosis Kit

LDL Uptake Flow Cytometry Assay Kit

Evaluation of a CD4-aptamer for Flow Cytometry-based Enumeration of T-cell Subsets

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

BD CBA on the BD Accuri C6: Bringing Multiplexed Cytokine Detection to the Benchtop

ab Exosome Isolation and Analysis Kit - Flow Cytometry, Plasma

Aina Blood Monitoring System

DURACLONE IF BE CERTAIN ABOUT THE RESPONSE. l res. a il n c n. For Research Use Only - Not for use in Diagnostic procedures

ab Exosome Isolation and Analysis Kit - Flow Cytometry, Cell culture

MRD Evaluation The Austrian experience

PointCare NOW TM Technical Note

T H 1, T H 2 and T H 17 polarization of naïve CD4 + mouse T cells

In vitro human regulatory T cell expansion

CD25-PE (BD Biosciences) and labeled with anti-pe-microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) for depletion of CD25 +

90 min 18 min. 45 min. 14 d

Phagocytosis of FITC labelled opsonized and non-opsonized E. coli bacteria by monocytes and granulocytes in a whole blood assay

In vitro human regulatory T cell expansion

Clinico-cytometric classification of PNH

ab Exosome Isolation and Analysis Kit - Flow Cytometry, Cell Culture (CD63 / CD81)

Understandable Statistics

Supplementary Table; Supplementary Figures and legends S1-S21; Supplementary Materials and Methods

Getting Beyond the Flags: Quantitative assessment of immature granulocyte (IG) populations may improve the assessment of sepsis and inflammation.

Lyophilised Cell Standards for Flow Cytometry. Richard Stebbings, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, UK

Direct ex vivo characterization of human antigen-specific CD154 + CD4 + T cells Rapid antigen-reactive T cell enrichment (Rapid ARTE)

BD FACSCanto II. A proven platform for maximum reliability and the highest quality results

DURACLONE RE THERE ARE EVENTS YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO MISS

Quantitation of T-lymphocyte Subsets Using the CELL-DYN Sapphire Automated Haematology Analyser

Cell sorting: A bridge between morphology and flow cytometry. Pr François Mullier, Pr Bernard Chatelain July 19th, 2013

BD OneFlow LST Application Guide

VUmc Basispresentatie

: New graphic materials for bioelisa and bioblot product lines

BD Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) Mouse Th1/Th2/Th17 Cytokine Kit

BD FACSCanto. BD FACSCanto. 488nm 20mw 633nm 17mw 0.1% 120uL/min 10,000events/sec. BD Biosciences 1

BD Procount Progenitor Cell Enumeration Kit

Table of Contents. Plots. Essential Statistics for Nursing Research 1/12/2017

Investigation of CD4+ T cell numbers in HIV-infected patients among smokers and non-smokers in Thailand

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Cerebral Spinal Fluid Involvement by Leukemia or Lymphoma

Concentration Estimation from Flow Cytometry Exosome Data Protocol

Application Information Bulletin: Navios Multi-center Study

Comparison of Methodological Data Measurement Limits in CD4 1 T Lymphocyte Flow Cytometric Enumeration and Their Clinical Impact on HIV Management

Supplementary Table e-1. Flow cytometry reagents and staining combinations

Technical Resources. BD Immunocytometry Systems. FastImmune Intracellular Cytokine Staining Procedures

Lipid Droplets Fluorescence Assay Kit

In vitro bactericidal assay Fig. S8 Gentamicin protection assay Phagocytosis assay

Peptide stimulation and Intracellular Cytokine Staining

PROFICIENCY TESTING 2016

Challenges in Development and Validation of an Intracellular Cytokine Staining assay

IFN-γ Secretion Assay Detection Kit (PE) human

Automatic buffy coat extraction: methodology, feasibility, optimization and validation study

Naive, memory and regulatory T lymphocytes populations analysis

Predictive role of cutaneous lymphocyteassociated antigen (CLA) in TNF-α inhibitor treatment of psoriasis

BD Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) Human Th1/Th2/Th17 Cytokine Kit

Rapid antigen-specific T cell enrichment (Rapid ARTE)

CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY, May 2000, p Vol. 7, No. 3

Customer Information Literature List White Blood Cells

H-2K b OVA Tetramer -SIINFEKL (50 tests)

BD Leucocount Kit. Rx Only IVD

MAIT cell function is modulated by PD-1 signaling in patients with active

Cost Savings by Reagent Reduction in Flow Cytometry-Based CD4+ T Cell Counts: An Approach to Improve Accessibility for HIV Management

The Annexin V Apoptosis Assay

EXPERT COMMITTEE ON BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION Geneva, 29 October to 2 November 2018

Do Your Flow Cytometric LDTs. Validation Guidelines? Fiona E. Craig, MD University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

Fast and Easy Isolation of T Cells

Determination of monocyte count by hematological analyzers, manual method and flow cytometry in polish population

Transcription:

EXPERTISE, SERVICE PROVISION AND CUSTOMER RELATIONS QUALITY OF MEDICAL LABORATORIES CLINICAL BIOLOGY COMMISSION COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN CLINICAL BIOLOGY DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: CD34+ STEM CELL ENUMERATION SURVEY 2014/2 IPH-2014/2/CD34/11 Expertise, service provision and customer relations Quality of medical laboratories J. Wytsmanstreet, 14 1050 Brussels Belgium www.wiv-isp.be

ISSN: 2294-3498 COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS IPH (secretariat) TEL: 02/642.55.22 FAX: 02/642.56.45 Scheme coordinator: Dr. Van Blerk M. Alternate coordinator: Dr. Vernelen K. TEL: e-mail: TEL: e-mail: 02/642.53.83 mvanblerk@wiv-isp.be 02/642.55.29 kvernelen@wiv-isp.be Experts Dr. Bossuyt X. TEL: 016/34.70.09 FAX: 016/34.70.42 e-mail: xavier.bossuyt@uz.kuleuven.ac.be Dr. Chatelain B. TEL: 081/42.32.43 FAX: 081/42.32.04 e-mail: bernard.chatelain@uclouvain.be Dr. Demanet C. TEL: 02/477.50.71 FAX: 02/477.50.63 e-mail: christian.demanet@uzbrussel.be Dr. De Schouwer P. TEL: 03/217.78.01 FAX: 03/217.78.12 e-mail: pieter.deschouwer@zna.be Dr. Hougardy N. TEL: 063/23.16.30 FAX: 063/23.17.61 e-mail: nicolas.hougardy@vivalia.be Dr. Kestens L. TEL: 03/247.62.29 FAX: 03/247.62.31 e-mail: lkestens@itg.be Dr. Pradier O. TEL: 02/555.36.51 FAX: 02/555.44.99 e-mail: olivier.pradier@erasme.ulb.ac.be Dr. Van Bockstaele D. TEL: 015/34.21.11 FAX: 015/34.21.47 e-mail: vanbocd@labcorp.com Committee of experts: 17/06/2014 Authorisation to release report: by Marjan Van Blerk (scheme coordinator) on 11/07/2014 All the reports are also available on our webpage: https://www.wiv-isp.be/qml/activities/external_quality/rapports/_nl/rapports_annee.htm https://www.wiv-isp.be/qml/activities/external_quality/rapports/_fr/rapports_annee.htm FORM 43/124/E v5. 2/18

TABLE OF CONTENTS Sample material 4 Participation 5 Methodology of the Belgian clinical laboratories 6 Results 7 Conclusion 15 Interpretation of the individual report 16 Next survey 18 FORM 43/124/E v5. 3/18

SAMPLE MATERIAL Sent out specimens The survey comprised 2 fresh umbilical cord blood samples (FC FC 12849). 12848 and The sample material was kindly provided by Dr. Pradier (Hôpital Erasme, Brussels) and distributed into aliquots at the Institute of Public Health (IPH, WIV-ISP). The sample material was collected into citrate-phosphate-dextrose. The samples were sent by Taxipost 24h and the laboratories were informed by e-mail of the send-out of the control material (day 0: 13 th of May 2014). The samples were tested negative for HIV 1 and 2, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C and syphilis. Requested analyses The participants were asked to perform flow cytometric CD34+ stem cell enumeration and to indicate the date of receipt, the date of sample analysis, and to provide details of the type of flow cytometer, the sample preparation technique, the source of antibodies, the gating strategy, and the data analysis software used. Since the samples were not stabilised, the laboratories were asked to perform sample testing as soon as possible upon receipt. We would like to thank Dr. Pradier for providing the control material. FORM 43/124/E v5. 4/18

PARTICIPATION Twenty-five Belgian clinical laboratories, 1 clinical trial laboratory, and 1 commercial cord blood bank participated in this survey. The laboratories were able to submit their results over the internet using the url: https://qml.wiv-isp.be (toolkit). 92.6% of the participants returned their results this way. FORM 43/124/E v5. 5/18

METHODOLOGY OF THE BELGIAN CLINICAL LABORATORIES (n=25) Fifteen laboratories (60.0%) used a single platform approach for determining the absolute CD34+ cell count. Of these laboratories, 8 used Trucount technology (BD Biosciences), 5 Flow-Count or Stem-count beads (Beckman-Coulter) and 1 Perfect-Count microspheres (Cytognos). One participant used a volumetric single platform approach (MACSQuant analyzer (Miltenyi Biotec)). The next table gives an overview of the flow cytometers used: Flow cytometer Number of laboratories BD Biosciences FACSCanto II 13 Beckman-Coulter Cytomics FC 500 4 Beckman-Coulter Navios 4 BD Biosciences FACSCanto 2 BD Biosciences FACSCalibur 1 Miltenyi Biotec MACSQuant analyzer 1 Sample preparation Fourteen participants used a sample volume of 50 µl and 9 participants a sample volume of 100 µl. Most of the laboratories (n=22, 88.0%) used a lyse no wash method. The 3 other participants employed a lyse-wash technique. The following table summarises the lysing reagents used: Lysing reagent Number of laboratories Ammonium chloride (NH 4 Cl) 8 BD Biosciences Pharm Lyse 5 Beckman-Coulter VersaLyse 4 BD Biosciences FACS Lyse 3 BD Biosciences Ammonium chloride lysing solution 2 Cytognos Quicklysis 1 Qiagen EL-buffer 1 Monoclonal antibodies All but 3 laboratories (PC5.5/PE-Cy5.5, APC (n=2)) used a phycoerythrin (PE)- conjugated CD34 monoclonal antibody. All but 6 participants (APC-Cy7, APC-H7, Horizon V500 (n=2), Krome Orange, VioBlue) used a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)- conjugated CD45 monoclonal antibody. Viability More than 80% of the laboratories (n=21, 84.0%) evaluated CD34+ cell viability using 7-AAD (7-Amino-actinomycin D, n=20) or TO-PRO-3 (n=1). Gating strategy With 3 exceptions (Beckman-Coulter Stem-Kit (1), Bender protocol (1), BD Biosciences Stem Cell Enumeration Kit (1)), all participants applied the ISHAGE (International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering) gating protocol. FORM 43/124/E v5. 6/18

RESULTS All participants received the blood samples on day 1. 92.6% of the participants (n=25) performed the analyses on day 1 and 7.4 % on day 2 (n=2). Since the samples are fresh and not stabilised, it is extremely important to perform sample testing as soon as possible upon receipt. Statistics for the evaluation are solely based on the results of the Belgian clinical laboratories that performed the analyses on day 1 or 2 (n=25). The median % viable CD34+ cells within total WBC was 0.250% for sample FC 12848 and 0.260% for sample FC 12849. The overall CVs were 20.7 and 18.8%, respectively. The median absolute viable CD34+ cell count was 23.5 cells/µl for sample FC 12848 and 32.9 cells/µl for sample FC 12849. The overall CVs were 22.0 and 20.0%, respectively. FC 12848 Median CV % P25 P75 Range N % CD34+ cells within total WBC 0.250 20.7 0.220 0.290 0.136-0.340 25 Absolute CD34+ cell count (cells/µl) 23.5 22.0 19.0 26.0 13.0-31.5 25 FC 12849 Median CV % P25 P75 Range N % CD34+ cells within total WBC 0.260 18.8 0.234 0.300 0.180-0.360 25 Absolute CD34+ cell count (cells/µl) 32.9 20.0 29.9 38.8 23.0-44.9 25 FORM 43/124/E v5. 7/18

The following boxplots and histograms show these data graphically: FC12848 FC12849 Number of participants 0 2 4 6 8 % CD34+ cells within total WBC 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 % CD34+ cells within total WBC-FC12848 Number of participants 0 2 4 6 8 10 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 % CD34+ cells within total WBC-FC12849 FORM 43/124/E v5. 8/18

FC12848 FC12849 Number of participants 0 2 4 6 8 Absolute CD34+ cell count (cells/µl) 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Absolute CD34+ cell count (cells/µl)-fc12848 Number of participants 0 2 4 6 8 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Absolute CD34+ cell count (cells/µl)-fc12849 FORM 43/124/E v5. 9/18

In the next graph, the z-scores obtained for sample FC 12848 and FC 12849 are plotted against each other for each individual laboratory. The inner square of the plot represents the z-scores with absolute values <1, the next larger square represents the z-scores with absolute values <2, and the outer square represents z-scores with absolute values <3. Values situated outside of the outer square are considered unacceptable for at least one sample (z-score <-3 or >3). % CD34+ cells within total WBC Z-scores for FC12849-4 -2 0 2 4-4 -2 0 2 4 Z-scores for FC12848 FORM 43/124/E v5. 10/18

Absolute CD34+ cell count (cells/µl) Z-scores for FC12849-4 -2 0 2 4-4 -2 0 2 4 Z-scores for FC12848 FORM 43/124/E v5. 11/18

The next tables and box-and-whisker plots compare the results from the double (n=10) and single (n=15) platform users: FC 12848 Median CV P25 P75 Range N cells/µl % cells/µl cells/µl cells/µl Double platform 24.6 8.2 23.1 25.8 14.0-31.5 10 Single platform 21.8 24.2 18.9 26.0 13.0-28.7 15 FC 12849 Median CV P25 P75 Range N cells/µl % cells/µl cells/µl cells/µl Double platform 36.9 22.5 28.3 39.5 24.0-44.8 10 Single platform 32.1 8.9 30.1 34.0 23.0-44.9 15 FC12848 n= 10 n= 15 FC12849 n= 10 n= 15 CD34+ cells/µl 15 25 35 45 CD34+ cells/µl 15 25 35 45 Double platform Single platform Double platform Single platform The median WBC count obtained by the laboratories using a double platform approach was 9.55 10 9 /L for sample FC 12848 and 13.47 10 9 /L for sample FC 12849 (n=10). The overall CVs were 3.3 and 4.4%, respectively. The next table shows the individual results (10 9 /L) per type of haematology analyser: Haematology analyser FC 12848 FC 12849 Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire 9.50 9.60 9.67 11.80 13.30 14.10 Siemens Advia 2120 8.51 9.11 12.83 13.81 Sysmex XE 2100/XE 5000 8.93 9.48 9.61 9.73 12.69 13.05 13.68 13.69 Sysmex XN3000 9.46 13.64 FORM 43/124/E v5. 12/18

The next tables compare the absolute CD34+ cell counts obtained by the laboratories using a lyse no wash procedure for sample preparation (n=22) and those employing a lyse-wash method (n=3): FC 12848 Median/Results CV P25 P75 Range N cells/µl % cells/µl cells/µl cells/µl Lyse/no wash 24.5 16.5 20.5 26.0 13.0-31.5 22 Lyse/wash 14.0 19.0 23.5 3 FC 12849 Median/Results CV P25 P75 Range N cells/µl % cells/µl cells/µl cells/µl Lyse/no wash 32.9 19.4 30.3 39.0 23.0-44.9 22 Lyse/wash 24.0 24.3 36.5 3 The next tables compare the absolute CD34+ cell counts obtained by the laboratories evaluating CD34+ cell viability (n=21) or not (n=4): Median/ Results cells/µl No determination of viability 14.0 19.0 23.5 29.8 FC 12848 CV % P25 cells/µl P75 cells/µl Range cells/µl Determination of viability 24.4 17.1 20.4 26.0 13.0-31.5 21 N 4 Median/ Results cells/µl No determination of viability 24.0 24.3 36.5 40.1 FC 12849 CV % P25 cells/µl P75 cells/µl Range cells/µl Determination of viability 32.9 19.2 30.3 38.8 23.0-44.9 21 N 4 FORM 43/124/E v5. 13/18

The median viability of CD45+ cells was found to be 90.7% in sample FC 12848 and 89.8% in sample FC 12849. The median viability of CD34+ cells was found to be 99.2% in sample FC 12848 and 99.6% in sample FC 12849. FC 12848 Median CV P25 P75 Range N % % % % % Viability of CD45+ cells 90.7 6.1 86.2 93.7 67.8-100.0 22 Viability of CD34+ cells 99.2 4.3 94.3 100.0 87.2-100.0 18 FC 12849 Median CV P25 P75 Range N % % % % % Viability of CD45+ cells 89.8 4.9 88.1 94.0 68.5-100 22 Viability of CD34+ cells 99.6 3.4 95.5 100.0 86.4-103.0 18 Viability of CD45+ cells (%) 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Viability of CD34+ cells (%) 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 FC 12848 FC 12849 FC 12848 FC 12849 FORM 43/124/E v5. 14/18

CONCLUSION % CD34+ cells within total WBC (n=25) Twenty-two Belgian clinical laboratories (88.0%) reported results within the global median value +/- 2 SD. None of the Belgian clinical laboratories obtained an unacceptable result (z-score >3). Absolute CD34+ cell count (n=25) Twenty-four Belgian clinical laboratories (96.00%) reported results within the global median value +/- 2 SD. None of the Belgian clinical laboratory obtained an unacceptable result (z-score >3). FORM 43/124/E v5. 15/18

INTERPRETATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL REPORT Besides this global report, an individual report is at your disposal via internet (toolkit: https://qml.wiv-isp.be/toolkit/login/login.cfm) Following information is provided: Your result (R) Your method Global median (M g ): central value of the results obtained by all laboratories (all methods confounded). Global standard deviation (SD g ): measure of the spread of the results obtained by all laboratories (all methods confounded). Global median of your method (M m ): central value of the results obtained by the laboratories using your method. Standard deviation of your method (SD m ): measure of the spread of the results obtained by the laboratories using your method. The coefficient of variation CV (expressed in %) for all laboratories and for the laboratories using your method: CV m = (SD m / M m ) * 100 (%) and CV g = (SD g / M g ) * 100 (%). Z score: difference between your result and the median of your method (expressed as a number of SD): Z m = (R - M m ) / SD m and Z g = (R - M g ) / SD g. U score: relative deviation of your result from the median of your method (expressed in %): U m = ((R - M m ) / M m ) * 100 (%) and U g = ((R - M g ) / M g ) * 100 (%). A graphical interpretation of the position of your result (R) towards the results of all the participants as well as the results of the participants using your method, based on the method of Tukey, for each parameter and for each analyzed sample. R : your result M m/g : median H m/g : percentiles 25 and 75 I m/g : internal limits (M ± 2.7 SD) O m/g : external limits (M ± 4.7 SD) FORM 43/124/E v5. 16/18

The global graph and the one of your method are presented on the same scale, which allows you to compare them. These graphs give you a rough estimation of the position of your result (R) towards the medians (M m/g ). More information can be found in 3 brochures available on our website (only in Dutch and French): http://www.wiv-isp.be/clinbiol/bckb33/index_nl.htm https://www.wiv-isp.be/clinbiol/bckb33/index_fr.htm (choose brochures in the menu) or directly on the following webpage (only in Dutch and French): http://www.wiv-isp.be/clinbiol/bckb33/activities/external_quality/brochures/_nl/brochures.htm https://www.wiv-isp.be/clinbiol/bckb33/activities/external_quality/brochures/_fr/brochures.htm 1. Informatiebrochure over de externe kwaliteitsevaluatieprogramma's voor klinische laboratoria (Algemene informatiebrochure over de externe evaluatie)/ Brochure d information sur les programmes d évaluation externe de la qualité pour les laboratoires cliniques (Brochure d information générale sur l évaluation externe). 2. Statistische brochure (Algemene statistische berekeningsprocedure opgesteld door Professor Albert)/ Brochure statistique (Procédure générale de calcul statistique mis au point par le professeur Albert). 3. Verwerking van gecensureerde waarden (Statistische berekeningsprocedure toegepast op de gecensureerde waarden opgesteld door Professor Albert)/ Traitement des valeurs censurées (Procédure de calcul statistique appliquée aux valeurs censurées rédigée par le Professeur Albert). FORM 43/124/E v5. 17/18

NEXT SURVEY The next survey is scheduled for the 14 th of October 2014. END Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels 2014. This report may not be reproduced, published or distributed without the consent of the WIV-ISP. FORM 43/124/E v5. 18/18