Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Page:

Similar documents
Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Page:

Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended-Release Tablets M Clinical Study Report R&D/09/1109

Clinical Study Synopsis

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

Support for Acetaminophen 1000 mg Over-the-Counter Dose:

(For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug: to Part of Dossier:

Immediate-release Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen M Abbreviated Clinical Study Report R&D/08/1020

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Study No. 178-CL-008 Report Final Version, 14 Dec 2006 Reissued Version, 18 Jul 2011 Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. Page 13 of 122

Clinical Trial Results Summary Study EN3409-BUP-305

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

MorphiDex (MS:DM) Double-Blind, Multiple-Dose Studies In Chronic Pain Patients

SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

Study Center(s): The study was conducted at 39 study sites in Japan.

BRL /RSD-101C0D/1/CPMS-704. Report Synopsis

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Volume: Page:

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report IM Double-blind Period

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

Referring to Part IV of the Dossier

BRL /RSD-101RLL/1/CPMS-716. Report Synopsis

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Volume: Page:

Synopsis (C0168T60) Associated with Module 5.3 of the Dossier

SYNOPSIS. The study results and synopsis are supplied for informational purposes only.

23-Aug-2011 Lixisenatide (AVE0010) - EFC6014 Version number: 1 (electronic 1.0)

SYNOPSIS. Issue Date: 25 Oct 2011

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Principal Investigator: Marion, Alan, S, M.D., MDS Pharma Services (US) Inc., 621 Rose Street, PO Box 80837, Lincoln, NE 68502, USA

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

2.0 Synopsis. ABT-711 M Clinical Study Report R&D/06/573. (For National Authority Use Only) to Part of Dossier: Volume:

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

SYNOPSIS. ER OROS Paliperidone: Clinical Study Report R SCH-301

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

SYNOPSIS. Risperidone-R064766: Clinical Study Report RIS-USA-232 (FOR NATIONAL AUTHORITY USE ONLY)

Page: 17 December 2012 (Study M13-692) 22 October 2013 (Study M13-692)

SYNOPSIS INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER (FOR NATIONAL AUTHORITY USE ONLY) Volume: Page:

Synopsis (C1034T02) CNTO 95 Module 5.3 Clinical Study Report C1034T02

Synopsis. Clinical Report Synopsis for Protocol Name of Company: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

SYNOPSIS. Administration: subcutaneous injection Batch number(s):

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

CLINICAL STUDY REPORT SYNOPSIS

INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER Volume: Page:

Synopsis (C0524T12 GO LIVE)

Clinical Trial Study Synopsis

SYNOPSIS (PROTOCOL WX17796)

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

BRL /RSD-101C0F/1/CPMS-716. Report Synopsis

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

2.0 Synopsis. ABT-358 M Clinical Study Report R&D/06/099. (For National Authority Use Only) to Item of the Submission: Volume:

Treatment A Placebo to match COREG CR 20 mg OD + Lisinopril 10 mg OD (Days 1-7) Placebo to match COREG CR 40 mg OD + Lisinopril 10 mg OD (Days 8-14)

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

SYNOPSIS Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI444031

SYNOPSIS. Publications No publications at the time of writing this report.

Synopsis Style Clinical Study Report SAR ACT sarilumab Version number : 1 (electronic 1.0)

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Clinical Trial Study Synopsis

Clinical Study Report AI Final 28 Feb Volume: Page:

SYNOPSIS. Risperidone-R064766: Clinical Study Report RIS-INT-24 (FOR NATIONAL AUTHORITY USE ONLY)

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

Allergan Not Applicable AGN A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Dose, Parallel

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER Volume: Page:

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report R&D/04/900. (For National Authority Use Only) Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume:

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page:

This was a multinational, multicenter study conducted at 14 sites in both the United States (US) and Europe (EU).

ABT-493/ABT-530 M Clinical Study Report Post-Treatment Week 12 Primary Data R&D/16/0162. Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page:

Study Centers: This study was conducted in 2 centers in Italy.

SYNOPSIS. Co-ordinating investigator Not applicable. Study centre(s) This study was conducted in Japan (57 centres).

Product: Omecamtiv Mecarbil Clinical Study Report: Date: 02 April 2014 Page 1

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Clinical Study Synopsis

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

SYNOPSIS A two-stage randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase III, multicenter, 7-month study to assess the efficacy and safety of SYMBICORT

Product: Denosumab (AMG 162) Clinical Study Report: month Primary Analysis Date: 21 November 2016 Page 1

INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER

2.0 Synopsis. Paricalcitol Capsules M Clinical Study Report R&D/15/0380. (For National Authority Use Only)

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Volume:

(For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug: to Part of Dossier:

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Clinical Trial Study Synopsis

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

SYNOPSIS. Study Coordinator. Study centre(s)

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

SYNOPSIS 2/198 CSR_BDY-EFC5825-EN-E02. Name of company: TABULAR FORMAT (For National Authority Use only)

SYNOPSIS (FOR NATIONAL AUTHORITY USE ONLY) INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER

Clinical Study Synopsis

Clinical Study Synopsis

2.0 Synopsis. ABT-333 M Clinical Study Report R&D/09/956

Study No: Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Statistical Methods: Sample Size

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report AI Addendum #1. Open-label Dosing Phase

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Transcription:

2. SYNOPSIS Title of Study: A phase III comparative study of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of extended release, regular release and placebo during a 12 hour observation in post-extraction dental pain. Investigators: James R. Fricke, D.D.S., M.S.D. Study Centers: Pharmaco LSR Health Research Center, 2901 North IH-35, Austin, TX 78722 Publication (reference): Study Period: Date of first enrollment: Date of last completed: Phase of Development: 3 Objective: The overall objective of this study was to evaluate over a 12 hour observation period the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy and safety profiles of a single dose of 600 mg extended release caplets compared to equivalent total doses of regular release 200 mg caplets administered in three different dosing regimens, and placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe post-operative dental pain resulting from three or four third molar extractions including at least one partial or complete bony impacted third mandibular molar. Methodology: This study was a double-blind, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled, single-center, PK/PD, dental pain study. All patients who met the entrance criteria were enrolled in one of two study subgroups. One sub-group of patients had both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations 1

(PK group); the other sub-group of patients had only the analgesic efficacy evaluations (non-pk group). A separate randomization schedule was used for each of the two subgroups. Patients assessments of pain intensity and pain relief as well as blood samples for plasma analysis were obtained at the study site at Hours 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8.5, 9, 10, 11, and 12. A stopwatch technique was used to measure the onset of meaningful pain relief. Number of Subjects (planned and analyzed): A total of 210 patients were entered into the study; 208 patients were eligible for the efficacy analyses. Diagnosis and Main Criteria for Inclusion: The patients evaluated in this study consisted of male or non-pregnant and non-lactating female out-patient volunteers, 16 years of age or older, complaining of moderate to severe pain following the surgical extraction of three or four third molars with at least one partial or complete bony impacted third mandibular molar. The term impacted included: partial bony impaction; bony impaction; or complicated bony impaction. Test Product, Dose and Mode of Administration, Batch Number: Ibuprofen Extended Release 600 mg caplet (z-4003; C-116-14), oral Ibuprofen Regular Release 200 mg caplet (z-4004; C-243-7C), oral Duration of Treatment: The following five treatments were administered over eight hours: Ibuprofen Extended Release 600 mg single dose at 0 hour Ibuprofen Regular Release 600 mg single dose at 0 hour Ibuprofen Regular Release 400 mg at 0 hour; 200 mg at 4 hours Ibuprofen Regular Release 200 mg at 0, 4, and 8 hours Placebo 2

Reference Therapy, Dose and Mode of Administration, Batch Number: Placebo caplet (z-4005; C-116-16B), oral Criteria for Evaluation: Efficacy: Patients assessments of pain intensity and pain relief as well as blood samples for plasma analysis were obtained at the study site at Hours 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8.5, 9, 10, 11, and 12. A stopwatch technique was used to measure the onset of meaningful pain relief. Safety: Statistical Methods: SUMMARY - CONCLUSIONS Efficacy Results: Only the efficacy and safety results are provided in this report; the PK/PD results are not included in this report. Demographic and Baseline Characteristics: Table 1-1 summarizes the demographic parameters for the 210 patients. There were no statistically significant differences among treatments for any demographic variable, for any baseline variables (p > 0.65), or pretreatment vital signs (p > 0.42). 3

Pain Intensity Evaluations Table 1-2 summarizes the differences between treatments on the pain intensity evaluations. Overall, for the Hour 0 to Hour 12 area comparisons, all treatments were significantly better than placebo (p < 0.001). Ibuprofen regular release 400/200/0 showed superiority over extended release (p = 0.01) and regular release 200/200/200 (p = 0.03). Figure 1-1 summarizes the results for pain intensity differences over time. 4

5

Pain Relief Evaluations Table 1-3 summarizes the differences between treatments on the pain relief evaluations. Overall, for the Hour 0 to Hour 12 area comparisons, all treatments were significantly better than placebo (p < 0.01) and regular release 400/200/0 showed superiority over extended release (p = 0.002), regular release 200/200/200 (p = 0.003) and regular release 600/0/0 (p = 0.05). 6

Time to Rescue (Remedication) All active treatments had significantly longer times to remedication than did placebo (p < 0.004). Ibuprofen extended release was not significantly different from regular release 200/200/200 (p = 0.43) or regular release 600/0/0 (p = 0.23). However, regular release 400/200/0 had significantly longer times to remedication than extended release (p = 0.02). Only marginally significant differences were observed in the comparisons between the regular release treatments (p > 0.06). Time to Onset All active treatments had significantly shorter times to onset than placebo (p < 0.007). Ibuprofen extended release was not significantly different from regular release 200/200/200 (p = 0.86). The regular release regimens with 7

larger doses earlier had at least marginally significantly shorter times to onset than extended release (p < 0.08). Overall Rating of Study Medication All active treatments had significantly better Overall Ratings than placebo (p < 0.001). Ibuprofen extended release was not significantly different form regular release 200/200/200 (p = 0.50) and had significantly worse Overall Ratings than regular release treatments with larger doses earlier (p < 0.01). Safety Results: Table 1-4 summarizes the adverse drug experiences (ADEs) that were reported in this study. The overall ADE rate was not statistically significant different among the five groups (p = 0.86). The majority of all ADEs as well as drug-related or possibly drug-related ADEs reported in each treatment group were nausea, vomiting and headache. Ibuprofen was well tolerated. There were no deaths or serious ADEs that required the submission of a safety report. 8

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated that in the comparisons among the extended release treatment, the regular release treatments and placebo, similar trends were found for hourly pain intensity differences from baseline, hourly pain relief evaluations, time to onset, time to rescue and overall rating of study medication. In virtually all comparisons between active treatments and placebo, the active treatments were significantly better than placebo. Ibuprofen extended release was not significantly different from regular release 200/200/200. Furthermore, the regular release treatments that provided doses greater than 200 mg during the first four hours demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than the extended release and regular release 200/200/200 treatments. In general, regular release 600/0/0 did not demonstrate greater efficacy than regular release 400/200/0 during this interval reflecting observations from controlled clinical trials that doses greater than 400 mg were no more effective than the 400 mg dose. The somewhat longer duration of efficacy of regular release 400/200/0 compared with extended release may have been due to the cumulative effect of the 400 mg loading dose plus the sustained blood levels from the second 200 mg dose of at four hours. The statistically significantly greater efficacy of the regular release treatments compared to placebo demonstrated the validity of the dental extraction analgesic model used in this study. The treatment superiority of extended release over placebo in this analgesic model demonstrated that the dental pain model had sensitivity through the 12 hour observation period. This is particularly relevant since it can be assumed that the pain in this model does not abate in 12 hours and often returns to baseline levels in the absence of adequate analgesic treatment. Ibuprofen extended release was well tolerated in this clinical trial. There were no overall differences between groups with respect to total ADEs, drug-related ADEs or possibly drug-related ADEs. No deaths or serious ADEs that required the submission of a safety report were reported in this study for any treatment group. Date of the Report: October 13, 1997 9