Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

Similar documents
ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

RETENTION AND RELAPSE

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

Fixed Twin Blocks. Guidelines for case selection are similar to those for removable Twin Block appliances.

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

#45 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTIVE ERUPTION GUIDANCE -- PREVENTIVE OCCLUSAL DEVELOPMENT

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

Class II correction with Invisalign - Combo treatments. Carriere Distalizer.

Orthodontic treatment of midline diastema related to abnormal frenum attachment - A case series.

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Prosthetic Options in Implant Dentistry. Hakimeh Siadat, DDS, MSc Associate Professor

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

Sample Case #1. Disclaimer

Removable appliances

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

Fixed appliances II. Dr. Káldy Adrienn, Semmeweis University

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Development of occlusion:

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

Mixed Dentition Treatment and Habits Therapy

Preventive Orthodontics

A SIMPLE METHOD FOR CORRECTION OF BUCCAL CROSSBITE OF MAXILLARY SECOND MOLAR

Arrangement of posterior artificial teeth Standardized parameters Curve of Wilson Curve of Spee

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Skeletal Class III patients can be some of the CASE STUDY. By Jeffery Gerhardt, DDS. Acceptable Results Likely. Poor Results Likely. Fig.

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Clinical UM Guideline

Segmental Orthodontics for the Correction of Cross Bites

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Management of Crowded Class 1 Malocclusion with Serial Extractions: Report of a Case

Ortho-surgical Management of Severe Vertical Dysplasia: A Case Report

Treatment of Class II non-extraction using the Bioprogressive method

Ectopic upper canine associated to ectopic lower second bicuspid. Case report

ORTHODONTIC INTERVENTION IN MIXED DENTITION: A BOON FOR PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

The 20/20 Molar Tube. Ronald M. Roncone, D.D.S., M.S.

Definition and History of Orthodontics

Orthodontics (Ort) #910 Orthodontic Technique Lab Course Director: Dr. Brian Preston Instructor: Brian D. Willison CDT

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

TransForce 2. Arch Developer Appliances Clinical Cases. New Horizons In Orthodontics

6. Timing for orthodontic force

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Developing Facial Symmetry Using an Intraoral Device: A Case Report

Development of occlusion

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

Correction of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion by Fixed Functional Class II Corrector Appliance: Case Report

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

Volume 22 No. 14 September Dentists, Federally Qualified Health Centers and Health Maintenance Organizations For Action

ISW for the treatment of adult anterior crossbite with severe crowding combined facial asymmetry case

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

New Class of Appliance

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

Orthodontics. Anomalies

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Alveolar Bone Remodeling and Development after Immediate Orthodontic Root Movement

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

The Tip-Edge appliance and

DELTA DENTAL PPO EPO PLAN DESIGN CP070

Molar distalisation with skeletal anchorage

Removable orthodontic appliances: new perspectives on capabilities and efficiency

Functional Appliances

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

Ankylosed primary teeth with no permanent successors: What do you do? -- Part 1

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Monograph of Dr. Anka s presentation. Treatment of Canted Occlusal Plane George Anka, DDS, MS and Duane Grummons, DDS, MSD

The Aetiology of Malocclusion

Transverse malocclusion, posterior crossbite and severe discrepancy*

The Inman Aligner. The Inman Aligner,* a versatile removable

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

AAO / AAPD Scottsdale 2018

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Arch dimensional changes following orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars

The following standards and procedures apply to the provision of orthodontic services for children in the Medicaid/NJ FamilyCare (NJFC) programs.

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Congenitally missing mandibular premolars treatment options for space closure. Educational aims and objectives. Expected outcomes

Corporate Medical Policy

THE MBT VERSATILE+ APPLIANCE SYSTEM

Expansion/Arch Development

Invisalign technique in the treatment of adults with pre-restorative concerns

Early Mixed Dentition Period

Diagnosis. overt Examination. Definitive Examination. History. atient interview. Personal History. Clinical Examination.

Transcription:

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Development Overview Development of Dentition Treatment Retention and Relapse Growth of Naso-Maxillary Complex Develops postnatally entirely by intramenbranous ossification By apposition of the bone at the sutures By surface remodeling The entire surface of the anterior maxilla Grows out from under the cranium Down and forward The sutures remain the same width, and the various processesbecome longer Growth of Mandible Endochondral At the condyle Periosteal Down and forward growth From the base of the cranium Now let us talk about how we transition from primary molar occlusion to permanent molar occlusion. When evaluating the relationship of the primary second molars, they are classified into three distinct categories: a flush terminal plane, distal step and mesial step. Three categories: Flush Terminal Plane, Distal Step, and Mesial Step Flush Terminal Plane(Developing a Class I Molar Relationship) 75% of the flush terminal planes will ultimately develop into a Class I molar relationship in the permanent dentition, still they must be observed critically because an abnormal Class II may develop. Early Mesial Shift (Developing a Class I Molar Relationship) Flush primary second molars Spaced primary dentition (primate spaces) Normal eruption pattern- mandibular first molar migrates mesially to close primate space Late Mesial Shift (Developing a Class I Molar Relationship) Flush primary second molars Closed primary dentition (no primate spacing) Class I via leeway space(man premolars smaller than primary molars) Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

Distal Step Usually develops into Class II skeletal and dental malocclusion (~100%) Flush terminal plane plus factors which reduce arch length Refer for early evaluation Class I Molar Relationship of the Maxilla to the Mandible The normal anteroposterior relationship of the mandible to the maxilla. The mesiobuccal cusp of the permanent maxillary first molar occludes in the buccal groove of the permanent mandibular first molar. Class 2 Molar Relationship of the Maxilla to the Mandible The posterior relationship of the mandible to the maxilla. The mesiobuccal cusp of the permanent maxillary first molar occludes mesial to the buccal groove of the permanent mandibular first molar. Division 1 Labioversion of the maxillary teeth. Division 2, Linguoversion of the maxillary central incisor teeth. Class 3 Molar Relationship of the Maxilla to the Mandible The mesiobuccal cusp of the permanent maxillary first molar occludes distal to the buccal groove of the permanent mandibular first molar. Etiology- Arch Length Reduction Large carious lesions Early loss of maxillary first or second primary molars Ectopic eruption (especially maxillary first molar) Diagnostic Techniques Interview to establish C/C Review of the medical and dental history Physical growth evaluation Growth Charts Hand-wrist radiographs Social and Behavioral Evaluation Clinical Evaluation Oral Health Jaw and Occlusal function Evaluation of Facial Properties Developmental Age Facial Esthetics vs. Facial Proportions Frontal Exam Profile Analysis Diagnostic Records Intraoral photos Panoramic film

Regular dental care No previous caries No obvious pathology Hx of fluoridation Bitewings Previous caries Obvious caries Indications Psychosocial Problems Oral Function Relationship to Injury and Dental Disease Index of Treatment Need (IOTN) Grade 5 Extreme Grade 4 Severe Grade 3 Moderate Grade 2 Mild Grade 1 No Need Contraindications Poor oral hygiene and lack of cooperation. Lack of bony support for the dentition. Poor general or mental health. Lack of interest. Advantages Can be removed for Social Situations Fabricated in the lab Allow growth guidance Disadvantages Patient Compliance Inability of complex tooth movements Indications Growth Modification Limited tooth movements Retention Passive Tooth-borne Appliances Activator Used in the mixed dentition to treat Class II division 1 malocclusion. It is a loose fitting appliance that fits on the maxilla and worn only at night. It transmits the tissue-forming functional stimuli from the activity of the tongue, lips, facial and masticatory muscles to the teeth, periodontal tissues, alveolar bone, and mandibular joint. The effect is to cause mandibular growth and open the bite 3-4mm. It is constructed to position the patient into a class I occlusion with the teeth 5mm apart using an anterior bite plane. A Hawley bow provides

stability. Bionator Used to correct class II malocclusion and anterior open bites, it can be used in the mixed dentition or early adult dentition stages. Similar in function as an activator. Herbst Appliance Used in the treatment of skeletal class II occlusions, suggested for patients who do not readily cooperate with traditional removable appliance therapy. Maxillary and mandibular arches are splinted with frameworks that are connected with a pin and tube devise that positions the mandible forward. Stimulates mandibular growth in the growing patient. Twin Block Separate maxillary and mandibular splints cover the occlusal surfaces and contain ramps that position the mandible forward. Can be removable or fixed. Crozat Appliance Removable all-wire appliance used to correct many types of orthodontic problems. Basic design is a TP bar in the maxilla and a lingual arch in the mandible. Various extensions, finger springs, loops, rests, and other devices to deliver required forces. This appliance is used instead of the standard band/bracket system. Active Tooth-borne Appliances Active plates for arch expansion modifications of activators that contain jack screws, expansion screws or springs to move teeth. Example: Sagittal Appliance an arch lengthening appliance, contains jack screws that are activated to move teeth in an anterior/posterior direction along the crest of the alveolar ridges. Common applications include uprighting anterior teeth in class II div 2 cases, or to provide molar distalization in closed class II malocclusions. Fixed Appliances Brackets and Bands Greater control over tooth movement Able to move teeth in all three dimensions First order prescription height of bracket adjusts for relative buccal-lingual position of teeth Second order prescription horizontal alignment of slot in the bracket adjusts for mesial-distal tilt of the teeth Third order prescription buccal-lingual tilt of bracket adjusts for relative buccal-lingual tilt of the teeth Single Phase vs Multi-Phased Single Phase is gold standard Multiple phase treatment takes longer and costs more Should offer a clear advantage in: Esthetic Development Function Trauma prevention Interceptive Between the ages of 7-11 Advantages of rapid change in skeletal and dental structures due to rapid growth Growth modification Typically followed up with comprehensive therapy between the ages of 12-18 Limited Therapy

Partial placement of brackets for a shorter amount of time Extrusion Molar uprighting Reduce crowding Close spaces Fixed or removable appliances Comprehensive Therapy Fixed appliances Longer period of treatment Divided into three phases Level and aligning Working phase Finishing Goal is to make the patients occlusion as ideal as possible Surgical vs. Non-surgical Non-surgical known as camouflage Objective is to correct the malocclusion while making the underlying skeletal problems less apparent Class II patient camouflage well Class III and long face problems do not Correction of the malocclusion may make the skeletal problem worse Retention Required for three reasons Gingival and periodontal tissues require time to reorganize 3-4 months Soft tissues exert pressure and increase relapse potential Changes in growth may alter the final result Timetable Full time retention 3-4 months Part time up to a year inclusive of above time Patients who are not growing may require permanent retention as the tissues do not readily adapt to the new positions of the teeth. Types Removable Hawley, Essix Fixed required for lower incisors during late growth, diastema maintenance, maintenance of pontic or implant space Relapse Due to disruption of the PDL removing the active stabilization effect Immediately after removal of appliances teeth will be unstable Occlusal forces Soft tissue pressures Questions? Proffit, W. R., Fields, H. W., & Sarver, D. M. (2007). Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier.