Original papers Medical Ultrasonography 2010, Vol. 12, no. 3, 213-217 Spleen assessment by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography (ARFI) for prediction of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension Simona Bota 1, Ioan Sporea 1, Roxana Şirli 1, Alina Popescu 1, Mirela Dănilă 1, Mădălina Şendroiu 1, Mircea Focşa 2 1 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania 2 Department of Biophysics and Medical Informatics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, Romania Abstract Aim: To establish the values of spleen stiffness (SS) assessed by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) in healthy subjects and in cirrhotic patients, and to evaluate its predictive value for the presence of cirrhosis and for the presence and severity of esophageal varices (EV). Patients and methods: Our study included 82 subjects (15 healthy volunteers, 57 cirrhotic patients, 10 with various grade of liver fibrosis), 38 women and 44 men. Of these, 42 cirrhotic patients had varices, 30 had significant EV and 11 had a history of variceal bleeding. We performed 10 measurements in each patient expressed in meters/second and a median value was obtained. Results: The mean SS values were: 2.04±0.28 in healthy subjects and 3.10±0.55 in cirrhotic patients (p<0.001). For a cut-off value of >2.51 m/s of SS, ARFI had 85.2% Se, 91.7% Sp, 95.8% PPV, 73.3% NPV, 87.1% accuracy (AUROC=0.91) for predincting liver cirrhosis. No significant differences regarding SS were observed between patients with and without EV, also between those with and without a history of variceal bleeding. Conclusion: SS evaluated by means of ARFI had a very good predictive value for the presence of cirrhosis (AUROC=0.91, accuracy=87.1%), but could not predict the presence or severity of EV, also the risk of variceal bleeding. Keywords: spleen stiffness, liver stiffness, liver cirrhosis, esophageal varices, ARFI (Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse) Rezumat Scop: Stabilirea valorilor elasticităţii splinei (ES) prin ARFI la subiecţii sănătoşi, la pacienţii cirotici şi evaluarea capacităţii metodei de predicţie a cirozei hepatice, a prezenţei şi severităţii varicelor esofagiene (VE). Pacienţi şi metode: Studiul nostru a inclus 82 de subiecţi (15 voluntari sănătoşi, 57 de pacienţi cirotici şi 10 cu diferite grade de fibroză hepatică), 38 femei şi 44 bărbaţi. Dintre acestia 42 de pacienţi cirotici au avut VE, 30 au avut VE semnificative şi 11 istoric de sângerare variceală. La fiecare pacient s-au determinat 10 măsurători valide exprimate în metri/secundă şi s-a calculat mediana valorilor. Rezultate: Valorile medii ale ES au fost: 2.04±0.28 la voluntarii sănătoşi şi 3.10±0.55 la cirotici (p<0.001). Pentru o valoare cut-off >2.51 m/s a ES, ARFI a avut 85.2% Se, 91.7% Sp, 95.8%VPP, 73.3%VPN, 87.1% acutateţe (AUROC=0.91) pentru predicţia cirozei hepatice. Nu s-au observat diferenţe semnificative statistic privind ES la pacienţii cirotici cu sau fără VE, deasemenea între cei cu sau fără istoric de sângerare variceală. Concluzii: ES determinată prin ARFI are o foarte bună valoare predictivă pentru prezenţa cirozei hepatice (AUROC=0.91, acurateţe=87.1%), dar nu poate prezice prezenţa sau severitatea VE, precum şi riscul de sângerare variceală. Cuvinte cheie: elasticitatea splinei, elasticitatea hepatică, ciroză hepatică, varice esofagiene, ARFI (Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse) Received 15.06.2010 Accepted 02.07.2010 Med Ultrason 2010, Vol. 12, No 3, 213-217 Address for correspondence: Simona Bota Adress: 2, Intrarea Martir Angela Sava str, 300742, Timişoara, Romania Tel: +40-721-656147 Fax: +40-256-488003 Email: bota_simona1982@yahoo.com, Introduction In chronic hepatopathies, the evaluation of liver fibrosis is essential. Until some years ago, the evaluation of fibrosis was made only by liver biopsy (LB), considered to be the gold standard for hepathological evaluation [1], but in the latter years non-invasive methods (recently developed) are beginning to replace this invasive procedure. The non-invasive methods for the evaluation of liver fi-
214 Simona Bota et al Spleen assessment by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography (ARFI) brosis using ultrasound waves are: transient elastography (TE) (FibroScan) [2,3,4]; SonoElastography (Real-Time Tissue Elastography) (RT-E) [5-9] and ARFI (Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography) [10-13]. ARFI imaging technology involves the mechanical excitation of tissue using short-duration acoustic pulses (push pulses) in a region of interest chosen by the examiner, producing shear waves that spread away from the region of interest, generating localized, micron-scale displacements in the tissue [14,15]. Simultaneously, detection waves of lower intensity than that of the push pulse are generated. The push pulse uses a few hundred cycles and different voltage compared to the short cycle B-mode pulse. The moment of interaction between the shear waves and detection waves marks the period of time elapsed between the generating of shear waves and their entire crossing of the region of interest. By recording the shear wave front at several locations and correlating these measurements with the elapsed time, the shear wave velocity can be quantified; generally, the stiffer a region in the tissue, the greater the shear wave velocity as it travels through this region [13,16-18]. Aim: The aim of this paper was to establish the values of spleen stiffness assessed by ARFI in healthy subjects, in patients with liver cirrhosis and to evaluate its predictive value for the presence of cirrhosis, the presence and severity of esophageal varices (EV) and the risk of bleeding due to ruptured varices. Patients and methods: We obtained written informed consent from all the subjects involved in the study and the approval of the University Ethics Committee. We studied a number of 82 subjects, mean age 52.4±15 years, 38 women and 44 men. In each patient we measured liver stiffness (LS) by means of ARFI in the right liver lobe, 1cm below the liver capsule, by intercostal approach, with the patient lying in left lateral decubitus (fig 1); and spleen stiffness (SS) by means of ARFI, 1 cm under the spleen capsule, by intercostal approach, with the patient laying in right lateral decubitus (fig 2). ARFI measurements were performed with a Siemens Acuson S2000 TM ultrasound system. In each patient 10 valid ARFI measurements were performed in the liver and in the spleen and the median values were calculated, the results being expressed in meters/second. Our study included 15 healthy volunteers, without known liver pathology, 10 patients with various degrees of liver fibrosis (patients with liver biopsy) and 57 patients with liver cirrhosis. 52 had had recent gastroscopies (in the last 6 months). Of them, 42 (73.6%) had varices, 30 (52.6%) had significant EV (grade II or III) and 11 (19.2%) had a history of variceal bleeding. The data we obtained from our patients were collected in a Microsoft Excel file, the statistical analysis being performed using the MedCalc program. ARFI measurements were numeric variables, so the mean and standard variation were calculated. The t test was used to compare the ARFI values. The diagnostic performances of ARFI elastography were assessed by using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves that were built for the detection of cirrhosis. Optimal cut-off values were chosen to maximize the sum of Sensitivity (Se) and Specificity (Sp). Se, Sp positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated according to standard methods. Exact confidence intervals (CI) of 95% were calculated for each predictive test and used for comparing AUROC curves. Fig 1. ARFI determination in the liver Fig 2. ARFI determination in the spleen
Results: In 4 of the subjects we could not obtain valid measurements (4.8%), due to the poor cooperation of the patient and ultrasound window. Table I presents the means values of ARFI in the spleen (in those 78 patients with valid measurements) according to the liver pathology. We observed a statistically significant difference between SS in subjects without hepatic pathology and those with liver cirrhosis (p<0.001), between healthy volunteers and the patients with chronic hepatopathies with various degrees of fibrosis (p=0.03) and between the cirrhotic patients and those with various degrees of fibrosis (p<0.001). The best SS cut-off value for predicting cirrhosis was 2.51 m/s (AUROC 0.91, p<0.0001, with 85.2% Se, 91.7% Sp, 95.8% PPV, 73.3% NPV and 87.1% accuracy) (fig 3). Regarding LS evaluated by means of ARFI, for a cutoff value of 1.8 m/s (values resulted from our previous studies) [19], LS had 96.4%Se, 92%Sp, 96.4%VPP, 92% VPN and 95% accuracy for predicting cirrhosis. Using LS and SS combined values for predicting cirrhosis under cut-off values mentioned are obtained on these sensitivity and specificity: when one of the methods Table I: The mean ARFI values in the spleen according to the liver pathology Liver pathology Nr. patients Mean SS values Patients without liver pathology 15 2.04±0.28 Patients with various degrees of 9 2.41±0.50 liver fibrosis Patients with liver cirrhosis 54 3.10±0.55 ARFI- Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse, SS- spleen stiffness Medical Ultrasonography 2010; 12(3): 213-217 Table II: Mean values of SS determined by ARFI regarding the presence and the degrees of EV Esophageal varices Nr. patients Mean SS values Absent 14 2.94±0.61 Present (grad I+II+III) 40 3.19±0.55 Grade I 11 3.13±0.68 Grade II 23 3.16±0.51 Grade III 6 3.37±0.49 ARFI- Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse, SS- spleen stiffness, EV- esophageal varices Table III: Mean values of SS determined by ARFI regarding the history of variceal bleeding History of variceal bleeding Nr. patients Mean SS values No 30 3.15±0.58 Yes 10 3.28±0.45 ARFI- Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse, SS- spleen stiffness are positive-98.1%se, 95.8%Sp, 98.1%PVV, 95.8%VPN and 95.8% accuracy and when the both methods are positive-94.7%se, 96%Sp, 98.1%VPP, 88%NPV and 95.1% accuracy. No significant differences were observed regarding the mean SS values in patients with and without EV (p=0.16), also between those with different degrees of EV (grad I vs. grad II-p=0.88, grad I vs. grad III-p=0.46 and grad II vs. grad III-p=0.37). No significant differences were found between the mean SS values in cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices regarding the history of variceal bleeding (p=0.53) (Table III). No significant differences were observed regarding the mean SS between patients with liver cirrhosis without varices or small varices (grad I) and those with large varices (grad II and III): 3.02±0.64 m/s vs. 3.21±0.50 m/s (p=0.23). 215 Discussions Fig 1. AUROC curve for predicting liver cirrhosis In a meta-analysis performed by Friedrich-Rust [20] and co-workers on 50 studies, Transient Elastography (TE)-FibroScan had a very good predictive value for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (AUROC=0.94). Stefanescu et al [21] used TE, to determine SS in cirrhotic patients and its use in predicting the presence of esophageal varices. The study included 135 cirrhotic patients and for a cut-off value> 52.5 kpa, SS predicted the presence of EV with 75.2% accuracy. For a LS value>
216 Simona Bota et al Spleen assessment by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography (ARFI) 28 kpa the presence of EV was predicted with 72.2% accuracy. Using the LS and SS combined, with the cut-off values mentioned above, the presence of EV in cirrhotic patients was predicted with 89.6% accuracy. Calvaruso et al [22] also published a study using FibroScan determination in spleen and liver for predicting cirrhosis and esophageal varices. For a cut-off value of 47kPa, SS had 79%Se and 70% Sp for predicting cirrhosis. The AUROC curve of LS and SS for predicting the presence of EV had similar values (0.76 vs. 0.73), but LS had higher sensitivity than SS (0.84 vs. 0.72) for predicting the presence of large varices. In our study, ARFI technique had a good predictive value for the diagnosis of cirrhosis, with 85.2% Se, 91.7% Sp and 87.1% accuracy (AUROC = 0.91). The accuracy increased when we combined SS with LS, but we could not predict the presence of EV or variceal bleeding occurrence Gallotti et al [23] performed the first ARFI measurements in the spleen and they have published the only existing article in the literature so far. SS as well as the stiffness of other abdominal organs (liver, spleen, kidney, and pancreas) were evaluated in 35 healthy volunteers, the mean values being 2.44 m/s which conferred to the spleen the status of the toughest abdominal organ. In our study we obtained slightly lower SS values in patients without liver pathology (2.04 ± 0.28 m/s). Conclusions SS assessment by means of ARFI can be performed in most of the patients (95.2%).In our study, for a cut-off value of 2.51m/s, SS evaluated by means of ARFI had a very good predictive value for the presence of cirrhosis (AUROC=0.91, accuracy=87.1%). The accuracy for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis increased in combination with LS. These data suggest that SS evaluated by means of ARFI can be used in patients with indeterminable ARFI or TE measurements in the liver. Also, in our study no significant differences were found between SS mean values in cirrhotic patients with and without esophageal varices, with or without a history of variceal bleeding. Further studies are needed to confirm these data. Conflict of interest: None References 1. Gebo KA, Herlong HF, Torbenson MS, et al. Role of liver biopsy in management of chronic hepatitis C: A systematic review. Hepatology 2002; 36:S161 S172. 2. Rockey DC. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension with transient elastography. Gastroenterology 2008; 134:8 14. 3. Talwalkar JA, Kurtz DM, Schoenleber SJ, West CP, Montori VM. Ultrasound-based transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5:1214 1220. 4. Sporea I, Sirli R, Deleanu A, Tudora A, Bota M, Cornianu M. Liver stiffness evaluated through transient elastography in patients chronically infected with HBV. J Hepatol 2009; 50 (Suppl 1):S143 144. 5. Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Herrmann E, et al. Real-Time Elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188:758 764. 6. Tatsumi C, Kudo M, Ueshima K, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using serum fibrotic markers, transient elastography (FibroScan) and real-time tissue elastography. Intervirology. 2008; 51 (Suppl 1):27 33. 7. Havre RF, Elde E, Gilja OH, et al. Freehand real-time elastography: impact of scanning parameters on image quality and in vitro intra-and interobserver validations. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34:1638 1650. 8. Fujimoto K, Wada S, Oshita M, Kato M, Tonomura A, Mitake T. Non-invasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C using elastography. https:// www.hitachi-medical.co.jp/medix/pdf_sup/sup_07.pdf. 9. Popescu A, Sporea I, Focsa M, et al. Assessment of Liver Fibrosis by Real Time SonoElastography (Hitachi) as Compared to Liver Biopsy and Transient Elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35 (Suppl 8):S152. 10. Friedrich-Rust M, Wunder K, Kriener S, et al. Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis. noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. Radiology 2009; 252:595 604. 11. Sporea I, Şirli R, Popescu A, Deleanu A, Focsa M. Transient Elastography (FibroScan) as compared to Real Time- Elastography (Siemens) in patients with chronic hepatopathies. Gastroenterology 2009;136:A-327. 12. Sporea I, Sirli R, Popescu A, Deleanu A, Focsa M. How Relevant is Real-Time Elastography (Siemens), for the Evaluation of Liver Stiffness? Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35 (8 Suppl):S53. 13. Lupsor M, Badea R, Stefanescu H, et al. Performance of a new elastographic method (ARFI technology) compared to unidimensional transient elastography in the noninvasive assessment of chronic hepatitis C. Preliminary results. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2009; 18:303 310. 14. Madsen EL, Sathoff HJ, Zagzebski JA. Ultrasonic shear wave properties of soft tissues and tissuelike materials. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74:1346 1355. 15. Frizzell LA, Carstensen EL. Shear properties of mammalian tissues at low megahertz frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 60:1409 1411. 16. Zhai L, Palmeri ML, Bouchard RR, Nightingale RW, Nightingale KR. An integrated indenter-arfi imaging system for tissue stiffness quantification. Ultrason Imaging 2008; 30: 95-111.
17. Nightingale K, Soo MS, Nightingale R, Trahey G: Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28:227 235. 18. Mauldin FW Jr, Zhu HT, Behler RH, Nichols TC, Gallippi CM. Robust principal component analysis and clustering methods for automated classification of tissue response to ARFI excitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34:309 325. 19. Sporea I, Sirli R, Popescu A, Danila M. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) - a New Modality for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Med Ultrason 2010; 12:26 31.20. Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Martens S, et al. Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2008; 134:960 974. Medical Ultrasonography 2010; 12(3): 213-217 21.Stefanescu H, Grigorescu M, Lupsor M, Procopet B, Maniu A, Badea R. Spleen stiffness measurement using Fibroscan for the noninvasive assessement of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010 Mar 22. Epub ahead of print. 22.Calvaruso V, di Marco V, Bronte F, et al. Spleen stiffness correlates with portal hypertension and increases the accuracy of detection of esophageal varices in HCV cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2010; 52 (Suppl 1): S159. 23. Gallotti A, D Onofrio M, Pozzi Mucelli R. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) technique in ultrasound with Virtual Touch tissue quantification of the upper abdomen. Radiol Med2010 Jan 15. Epub ahead of print. 217