Surgical Treatment of Severe Degree of Ptosis of the Upper Eyelid Using a Fronto-tarsal Sling of Biocompatile PVC

Similar documents
Frontalis Sling Operation using Silicone Rods in Comparison to Ptose-Up for Congenital Ptosis with Poor Levator Function

Tarsal fixation of Fascia lata in Frontalis Sling Ptosis Surgery

Clinical Study The Long-Term Results of Frontalis Suspension Using Autogenous Fascia Lata in Children with Congenital Ptosis under 3 Years Old

MULLERS MUSCLE-CONJUNCTIVAL RESECTION PTOSIS PROCEDURE

Unilateral Frontalis Sling for the Surgical Correction of Unilateral Poor-Function Ptosis

Ptosis Repair Using Preserved Fascia Lata with the Modified Direct Tarsal Fixation Technique

A ptosis repair of aponeurotic defects by the posterior approach

Surgical Management of Ptosis: A Review of 37 Cases

Ptosis: A Clinical Profile and Management

The management of blepharoptosis is a complex issue. Many. Current Ptosis Management: A National Survey of ASOPRS Members ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION

Comparison of Mersilene mesh and autogenous fascia lata in correction of congenital blepharoptosis: A randomized clinical trial

A Cadaveric Anatomical Study of the Levator Aponeurosis and Whitnall s Ligament

Mersilene Mesh Vs Autogenous Fascia Lata for Upper Lid Sling Procedure

Fascia Lata Frontalis Sling for Treating Congenital Ptosis: Anatomical and Cosmetic Outcomes in Monotriangular Versus Bitriangular Configuration

An anatomical structure which results in puffiness of the upper eyelid and a narrow palpehral fissure in the Mongoloid eye

Chapter(2):the lid page (1) THE LID

Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Blepharoptosis in Korea: A 24-year Experience including 2,328 Patients

INSERTION* SURGICAL ANATOMY OF THE LEVATOR PALPEBRAE. impossible to dissect and separate these layers. That the levator aponeurosis

Patient information factsheet. Ptosis. What is ptosis?

Frontalis Suspension for Unilateral Ptosis with Poor Levator Function

Mersilene mesh sling as an alternative to autogenous fascia lata in the management of

Blepharoptosis (commonly referred

Regional nerve block of the upper eyelid in oculoplastic surg e r y

FRONTALIS SUSPENSION IS A SURGICAL PROCEDURE

Original Article Response to phenylephrine testing in upper eyelids with ptosis

Management of ipsilateral ptosis with hypotropia

I HE BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY

cme Combined Eyelid and Strabismus Surgery: Examining Conventional Surgical Wisdom Educational Objectives

Pathogenesis and surgical correction of dynamic lower scleral show as a sign of disinsertion of the levator aponeurosis from the tarsus *

Ptosis (drooping) of the upper eyelid (1) What is Ptosis? Ptosis describes a drooping of one or both upper eyelids. (2) What are the causes of ptosis?

Protocol. Blepharoplasty

frontalis muscle while the patient makes an attempt to open the eye. With the first and third classes I am not now concerned, except

MODIFIED SUTURELESS OPERATION FOR MILD BLEPHAROPTOSIS REPAIR

The Effect of Hering s Law on Different Ptosis Repair Methods

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. to blepharoptosis repair was first described by Everbusch 1 in 1883, but this

Blepharoptosis repair is covered as functional/reconstructive surgery to correct: Visual impairment due to droop or displacement of the upper lid.

Factors related to amblyopia in congenital ptosis after frontalis sling surgery

Hard Contact Lens Wear and the Risk of Acquired Blepharoptosis: A Case-Control Study

Ten Years of Results of Modified Frontalis Muscle Transfer for the Correction of Blepharoptosis

Muscle-Sparing Blepharoplasty: A Prospective Left-Right Comparative Study

A NEW OPERATION FOR CONGENITAL AND PARALYTIC PTOSIS. By M. SARWAR, M.B., B.S., D.O.M.S. Ophthalmologist, United Oxford Hospitals

Nature and Science 2014;12(10)

Prevention of Lower Eyelid Ectropion Using Noninsional Suspension Sutures after Blepharoplasty

Subject: Blepharoplasty, Blepharoptosis, and Brow Ptosis Repair 9/30/14

Adjustable sutures in eyelid surgery for ptosis and lid retraction

with laser resurfacing, 36, 37 Cryotherapy, lower eyelid cicatricial ectropion after, 151 Cutler-Beard flap. See Fullthickness

Apraxia of eyelid opening: Clinical features and therapy

Mc Gregor Flap for Lower Eyelid Defect

Management of Facial Nerve Paralysis

Subclinical Ptosis Correction: Incision, Partial Incision, and Nonincision: The Formation of the Double Fold

Repair of Eyelid Trauma

Subject: Blepharoplasty/Brow Surgical Procedures

C13. Basic Principles of Eyelid Surgery. 11 June :00 11:30hrs. Room 116 HAND-OUTS

Greater Manchester EUR Policy Statement. Title/Topic: Correction of Eyelid Ptosis Reference: GM047 Date: December 2014 Last Reviewed: January 2016

Ptosis - Drooping Eyelid(s)

ORIGINAL ARTICLE INTRODUCTION. Edward Ilho Lee 1, Nam Ho Kim 2, Ro Hyuk Park 2, Jong Beum Park 2, Tae Joo Ahn 2

BLEPHAROPLASTY, BLEPHAROPTOSIS AND BROW PTOSIS REPAIR

In situations where Reliable Visual Field testing is not possible, see section below, When the Member is Not

Topographic anatomy of the eyelids, and the evects of sex and age

Blepharoplasty. Definitions

Original Article Cosmetic

Frontalis suspension surgery to treat patients with essential blepharospasm and apraxia of eyelid opening-technique and results

Excessive skin on the eyelids due to chronic blepharedema, which physically stretches the skin.

Rehabilitation of the Paralyzed Face

Five common eyelid conditions, ABSTRACT OPHTHALMOLOGY. A Review of Common Eyelid Conditions for the Primary Care Physician Shannath L.

LOWER EYELID ENTROPION IS A COMMONLY ACQUIRED

Our Experience with Endoscopic Brow Lifts

THE MANAGEMENT OF INVOLUTIONAL LOWER LID ECTROPION

Classically, the normal eyelid anatomy can

Learn Connect Succeed. JCAHPO Regional Meetings 2017

Entropion. Geoffrey J. Gladstone. Examination. Congenital Entropion-Epiblepharon. Etiology

COVERAGE RATIONALE. Note: The Visual Fields and high-quality, clinical photographs must be consistent.

Surgical management of Duane's

Repair of Involutional Ectropion and Entropion: Transconjunctival Surgery of the Lower Lid Retractors

Vision Eye Centre, Siri Fort Road, New Delhi

BLEPHAROPLASTY, BLEPHAROPTOSIS AND BROW PTOSIS REPAIR

EFFICACY AND EFFICIENCY OF A NEW INVOLUTIONAL PTOSIS CORRECTION PROCEDURE COMPARED TO A TRADITIONAL APONEUROTIC APPROACH

Etiopathogenetic patterns of blepharoptosis in Western Nepal : an Overview

Secondary Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty

SURGICAL CURE OF SENILE ENTROPION* BY WALLACE S. FOULDS Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Long-term Enhancement of Botulinum Toxin Injections by Upper-Eyelid Surgery in 14 Patients With Facial Dyskinesias

Management of Lagophthalmos by Custom Made Gold Implants

The surgical management of childhood orbito-temporal neurofibromatosis q

Case Studies in Asian Blepharoplasty

Correction of the epicanthal fold using the VM-plasty

Surgical Correction of Crow s Feet Deformity With Radiofrequency Current

Treatment of ptosis in chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia

Aging Blepharoplasty INTRODUCTION. Review Article. Inchang Cho

Environmental Factors That Contribute to Upper Eyelid Ptosis: A Study of Identical Twins

Lateral Orbitotomy in the Management of Challenging Exotropia

MEDIAL CANTHAL LIGAment

BLEPHAROPLASTY, BLEPHAROPTOSIS AND BROW PTOSIS REPAIR

ASIANS DIFFER FROM SUBjects

Face. Definition: The area between the two ears and from the chin to the eye brows. The muscles of the face

CHAPTER 17 FACIAL AESTHETIC SURGERY. Christopher C. Surek, DO and Mohammed S. Alghoul, MD. I. BROW LIFT (Figures 1 and 2)

Alleviation of myogenic ptosis by

Surgical treatment of bilateral paralytic lagophthalmos using scapha graft in a case of lepromatous leprosy

Efficacy of gold weight implants in facial nerve palsy: quantitative alterations in blinking

Modified Double-Eyelid Blepharoplasty Using the Single-Knot Continuous Buried Non-Incisional Technique

Transcription:

Surgical Treatment of Severe Degree of Ptosis of the Upper Eyelid Using a Fronto-tarsal Sling of Biocompatile PVC ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hejsek H., Veliká V., Stepanov A., Rozsíval P. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Hradec Králové Head: prof. MUDr. Pavel Rozsíval, CSc., FEBO SUMMARY Purpose: ptosis is anomalous drop of the upper eyelid. Depending on the cause of the state and especially according to the results of clinical findings (dominated significance of elevation of the upper eyelid) we can be perform various surgical procedures. Operation under Fasanella-Servat is suitable for the easiest cases - function of the upper eye-lid levator muscle (levator) is at least 10 mm and a maximum of 2 mm ptosis. Aponeurosis advancement has good results in all types of involutional origin. Eyelid levator resection is performed when the levator function is better than 5 mm. Eye-lid sling to brow lift mechanism is designed for the toughest conditions, when the levator function is worse than 4 mm. The authors present the results of surgery for ptosis with biocompatible PVC tube fronto-tarsal sling. Methods: case-reports of 4 eyes in 3 adult patients were prospectively monitored. It was a one man and two women with different etiologies of ptosis. The principle of operation is suspension the upper eyelid to eyebrow-levators using PVC tubes in the subcutaneous tissue. Monitored parameters were: best corrected visual acuity, clinical finding of the front segment (with an emphasis on lagophthalmos in the postoperative period), eye-fissure height and levator function in millimeters (mm). Results: there was the most severe degree of ptosis in all cases. In terms of functional and cosmetic effect treatment were surgeries successful in all patients. One half of the cases (2 of 4 eyes) had transient postoperative lagophtalmos, which in one case was solved with moisture chamber. None of exposure keratopathy developed. In one case, it was after 9 months after the operation, we had to extract one implant due to extruzion of the tube. Conclusions: The fronto-tarsal tubing with biocompatible PVC is effective and relatively safe technique in cases of severe degree of ptosis of the upper eyelid. The material appears to be well tolerated by the surrounding tissue. Key words: ptosis surgery, fronto-tarsal sling, biocompatible PVC Čes. a slov. Oftal., 70, 2014, No. 3, p. 103 108 First author: MUDr. A. Stepanov Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Hradec Králové Sokolská 581 500 05 Hradec Králové stepanov.doctor@gmail.com INTRODUCTION The reasons for abnormal drop of the upper eyelid (ptosis) are myogenic, neurogenic and other. The most frequent cause of ptosis in adult age is aponeurotic and involutional aetiology, which relates to degenerative processes of aponeurosis of the musculus levatoris palpebrae superioris (levator). Dehiscence or space-out of aponeurosis of the levator is characterised by a medium-severe drop of the upper eyelid, with well preserved function of the levator. There is generally a higher position of the fold of skin of the upper eyelid, the tissue of the eyelid creates an impression of attenuation, and there is a deep sulcus of the upper eyelid. The normal position of the upper margin is approximately 2 mm below the upper limbus and the position of the lower margin approximately 1 mm below the lower limbus. The vertical size of the ocular rima is generally 7-10 mm in men and 8-12 mm in women. The scope of unilateral ptosis can be evaluated (measured) according to a comparison with the finding on the other side [6]. Drooping of the eyelid practically always causes objective and subjective ocular complaints. In more advanced cases it also involves an undesirable cosmetic effect of ptosis. The degree of ptosis of the upper eyelid, and especially of the function of the levator, evident upon clinical examination, are of key significance in the diagnosis of common types of ptosis, and are decisive for planning the correct type of surgical procedure. According to the clinical finding we evaluate the degree of ptosis: mild (drop of 2 mm, function of levator above 8 mm), medium (drop of 3 mm, function of levator better than 5 mm) and severe (drop of 4 mm and function of levator 0-5 mm). The therapeutic options are practically only surgical, and cover several types of procedures and variants thereof [1]. The clinical finding is a guide to a correctly indicated procedure and good functional and cosmetic result [4]. The basic types of surgeries are: truncation of upper part of tarsus together with Müller muscle (a surgery according to Fasanella-Servat procedure), CZECH AND SLOVAK OPHTHALMOLOGY 3/2014 103

resuture or truncation of aponeurosis of levator, resection of levator and suspension of upper eyelid on the eyebrow lift mechanism (fronto-tarsal sling). Surgeries for aponeurosis and the levator can be performed via a trans-cutaneous and transconjunctival approach. The surgery according to the Fasanella-Servat procedure is chosen for the easiest cases the function of the levator is minimally 10 mm and ptosis maximum 2 mm. Resuture or truncation of aponeurosis of levator have good results on practically all ptoses of aponeurotic and involutional aetiology. Resection of the levator of the eyelid is performed if the function of the levator is better than 5 mm. Use of a fronto-tarsal sling is designated for the most severe conditions, in which the function of the levator is worse than 4 mm. For the purposes of a fronto-tarsal sling on the eyebrow levator it is possible to use various types of materials: allogeneic fascia lata (a surgical procedure according to Crawford), or xenogeneic substitutes: silicon tube (Visitec Seiff frontalis suspension set) [3], polypropylene (Prolene ), polyamide (Supramid Extra II), polyester (Mersilene mesh) or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-tex, Ptose-up) [8]. METHODOLOGY We evaluate our results in a series of case reports, in which severe degree of ptosis of the upper eyelid was resolved by a fronto-tarsal suspension surgery from the eyebrow levator and subcutaneously using a sling made of a biocompatible PVC tube (PVB tube, code MZDRX00IJ9H7, manufacturer: Medi-Globe, s.r.o.). We evaluated the clinical finding according to an objective measurement of the position of the eyelid and the function of the levator. We measured the position of the upper eyelid (degree of drop of margin) as the vertical distance of the edges of the upper and lower eyelid (height of eye-slit in millimetres) [7]. We measured the function of the levator as the degree of excursion of movements of the upper eyelid upon maximum downward and upward gaze. In this measurement it is necessary to hold the eyebrow firmly (in order to eliminate the effect of the musculus frontalis) [6] (Fig. 1 and 2). The group consisted of 4 eyes of three patients. Patient 1 was a man aged 42 years who had total unilateral ptosis of post-traumatic aetiology. Patient 2 was a woman aged 86 years (very active), who suffered from a severe degree of ptosis on an involutional basis and had already undergone a bilateral procedure of the type of plication for levator aponeurosis, which had had only a transitory effect. In patient no. 3 (woman aged 41 years) this concerned a recurrence of congenital ptosis operated on in childhood. Surgical technique: in all cases we used a fronto-tarsal sling made of PVC tubing under local anaesthesia [9]. The principle of the surgery is the insertion of a silicon tube between the tarsus and its cutaneous covering, with subsequent guiding of the ends of the tube above the eyebrow and ending in the frontal region. The procedure begins with the indication of a pair of skin incisions: 2-3 mm from the limbus on both sides of the central third of the upper eyelid and at the upper edge of the eyebrow (slightly further from one another than on the eyelid), and one incision in the frontal region above the previous two (Fig. 3). We then perform subcutaneous infiltration anaesthesia (Marcaine and Supracaine in a ratio of 1:1) along the entire prospective course Fig 1 of the tube being down-pulled. The skin incisions are made by a scalpel and the silicon tube is guided through the subcutaneous tissue using a Wright needle on the fascia (Fig. 4). We begin in the depth of the pre- -tarsal musculus orbicularis between the incisions above the margin. Then both ends of the silicon tube are guided above the eyebrow (Fig. 5) and further into the central incision, where they are connected with a flexible sleeve (a Watzke sleeve can also be used) (Fig. 6). The position of the upper eyelid can be further corrected using supporting sutures, pulled behind the tube in the places of the eyelid incisions. We then draw close the ends of the tubes in the sleeve in such a manner as to ensure that the margin of the upper eyelid does not extend beyond the upper limbus. Excess ends of the tube are trimmed, and their join is embedded in the depth of the subcutaneous tissue, where they are not fixed. We stitch the subcutaneous tissue above the tubes with an absorbent 6/0 suture and the skin with an absorbent embedded 6/0 suture. The stitches do not require extraction. We do not suture the incisions on the eyelid whatsoever. RESULTS Patient no. 1 (total post-traumatic ptosis in a 42-year old man) hit a wire in June 2012 and tore off practically his entire upper eyelid. The wound reached from the inner 104 CZECH AND SLOVAK OPHTHALMOLOGY 3/2014

Fig 2 Fig 3 Fig 4 corner (injury to upper canaliculus of lacrimal pathways) parallel to the margin at a height of approximately the orbito palpebral sulcus, and ended above the outer corner. The primary suture was performed at another site. Upon examination at our site (after an interval of 6 months), the height of the eye-slit is 0 mm and the levator function 0 mm. The upper eyelid extends over the margin of the lower eyelid and at the same time is horizontally lax due to a malfunction of the internal ligament. Visual acuity is bilaterally 20/20. The lower lacrimal punctum is clear (Fig. 7). The extraocular and intraocular finding is normal in the other eye. The patient underwent a surgical procedure, in which the following was performed in a single operation: horizontal truncation of the upper eyelid, connection of the tarsus to the internal ligament and fronto-tarsal suspension. In the postoperative period mild ptosis persists, which is correcting itself with the subsidence of oedema. The anterior segment was without complications (not even transitional lagophthalmos occurred). Visual acuity was very good 1 year after the procedure (Fig. 8). Patient no. 2 (severe bilateral involutional ptosis in 86 year old woman with only short-term effect of surgery of the type plication for levator aponeurosis) also had an eventful anamnesis. At the age of 80 she underwent bilateral cataract surgery, after which ptosis transitionally appeared on the right side. 3 years later she reported with a finding of bilateral involutional ptosis, which was resolved by plication for levator aponeurosis (via trans-cutaneous approach) in both eyes. Concurrently with this type of surgery, blepharoplasty of dermochalasis was performed on both sides. The effect of the procedure was functionally and cosmetically good for approximately 2 years, after which a recurrence of bilateral ptosis occurred. The height of the ocular rima was 4 mm in the right eye, 1 mm in the left eye and the function of the levator 5 mm in the right eye and 3 mm in the left eye (Fig. 9). Visual acuity was 20/32 bilaterally. The clinical finding of a drop of the eyelid on the right side was on the boundary of indications for CZECH AND SLOVAK OPHTHALMOLOGY 3/2014 105

resection of the levator or a fronto-tarsal sling. With regard to the scarry, altered terrain following the previous procedures, we indicated a suspension surgery; first in the left eye, then in the other eye after an interval of 2 months. Lagophthalmos appeared in the left eye (3 mm) in the early postoperative period, which required weekly application of a moisture chamber and subsequent fortnightly application of lubricants. Exposure keratopathy did not develop. The condition spontaneously corrected itself; lagophthalmos subsided, as well as the patient s subjective complaints. Logophthalmos did not occur in the right eye, but the patient had a feeling of dryness and burning in the eye, which we resolved by means of fortnightly therapy with ocular lubricants. Visual acuity at the end of the eleven-month observation period remained 20/32 bilaterally. After an interval of 9 months from the surgery, a skin defect appeared in the right half of the forehead (in the area of the embedding of the connected parts of the tubes), with progressive extrusion of the distal ends of the implants. Excision of the septic edges of the wound was performed, followed by flushing with Betadine and embedding with fixation of the implant into the depth of the subcutaneous tissue by suture. The wound initially healed per primam intentionem, but after approximately two weeks the extrusion formed again and the implant was extracted. Subsequently the wound on the forehead healed without complication; however the upper eyelid again dropped to the preoperative level. In patient no. 3 (woman aged 41 years), this represented a recurrence of congenital ptosis, which was operated on at the age of 10 years at another site (we do not know the preoperative finding or the type of surgery performed). The upper eyelid then dropped again approximately 3 months after the surgery. She came to us at the age of 40 years; the height of the ocular opening is 4 mm and the function of the levator 4 mm. The upper eyelid has a higher recess than on the other side, and creates an impression of mild atrophy. For these reasons, we first of all attempted to perform surgery for aponeurosis of the levator: dystro- Fig 5 Fig 6 Fig 7 106 CZECH AND SLOVAK OPHTHALMOLOGY 3/2014

Fig 8 Fig 9 Fig 10 phically altered aponeurosis was found in the fibrotic terrain from the trans-cutaneous approach, and this was sutured to the upper edge of the tarsus. The perioperative functional finding was good, in the early postoperative period mild lagophthalmos occurred, which was not accompanied by subjective complaints or keratopathy. After almost six months, however, there was a recurrence of ptosis to its original level (Fig. 11). Due to expected fibrotisation following the previous procedures, we did not attempt resection of the levator again, and performed suspension by a sling made of tubing. The resulting effect at the end of the nine-month observation period is presented in Fig. 12. DISCUSSION Use of a fronto-tarsal sling has both advantages and disadvantages [3]. We consider the advantages to be: technical simplicity of the procedure, possibility of practically immediate performance of function, good availability and price of used material, possibility of use also for ptoses on which previous surgeries have not been successful, possibility of use even on very small children (where autologous fascia cannot be taken). If necessary, for example in the case of exposure keratopathy, the tube can be extracted relatively simply [5], which was confirmed also in our case. This type of procedure also does not prevent the applicable performance of other types of surgeries for ptosis in future (for example resection of levator). We consider the disadvantages to be the risk of lagophthalmos and exposure keratopathy, the incidence of infection complications, granulomas or the development of extrusion of foreign material [5]. From this perspective, the ideal type is a surgery with use of autologous fasciae latae. Granulomas and extrusions are considerably more common upon the use of Mersilene mesh material or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex). Furthermore, these materials are far more difficult to extract if necessary [5, 10]. In all cases it is suitable to embed xenogeneic implants as deep as possible. Probably the most complex problem CZECH AND SLOVAK OPHTHALMOLOGY 3/2014 107

in the entire procedure is achieving a good cosmetic effect in the sense of lateral symmetry. For this reason some authors recommend a bilateral sling, even if the condition is unilateral [2]. It is also possible in the case of necessity to weaken the function of the levator in the other eye, because a mild drop of the upper eyelid is cosmetically better (more natural) than retraction thereof. In planning the procedure and how radical it should be, it is necessary to take into account also the following clinical experiences: upon covering of the eye without ptosis this condition sometimes corrects itself, and upon elevation of the eyelid with ptosis the other upper eyelid sometimes drops. Attaining symmetry may then be a real challenge, and for this reason we do not recommend that patients are promised a perfect cosmetic result. It is always necessary to assess the drop of one eyelid as a bilateral problem. Fig 11 CONCLUSION A fronto-tarsal sling of made of biocompatible PVC seems to be an effective and at the same time relatively safe technique in cases of severe degree of ptosis of the upper eyelid. The used material is well tolerated by the surrounding tissue. Fig 12 LITERATURE 1. Beard, C.: Ptosis surgery past, present and future. Ophthalm Plast Reconstr Surg, 1985; 1: 69 72. 2. Callahan, A.: Correction of unilateral bleharoptosis with bilateral eyelid suspension. Am J Ophthalmol, 1972; 74: 321 326. 3. Carter, SR., Meecham,WJ., Seiff, SR.: Silicone frontalis slings for the correction of blepharoptosis: indications and efficacy. Ophthalmology, 1996; 103: 623-630. 4. Collin, JR., O Donnell, BA.: Adjustable sutures in eyelid surgery for ptosis and lid retraction. Br Ophthalmol, 1994, 78: 167 174. 5. Hintschich, CR., Zurcher, M., Collin, JR.: Mersilene mesh brow suspension: efficiency and complications. Br J Ophthalmol, 1995; 79: 358 361. 6. Kanski et al.: Clinical Ophthalmolgy, Butterworth Heinemann, Madison, 2000, p. 32. 7. Kuchynka a kol.: Oční Lékařství, Grada a.s., Praha, 2007, s. 635, 655. 8. Kwon, KA., Shipley, RJ., Edirisinghe, M. et al.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of synthetic brow-suspension materiale. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2014; 35: 220 230. 9. Leone Jr., CR., Shore, JW., Van Gemert, JV.: Silicone rod frontalis sling for the correction of blepharoptosis. Ophthal Surg, 1981; 12: 881 887. 10. Mutlu, FM., Tuncer, K., Can, C.: extruzion and granuloma formation with mersilene mesh brow suspension. Ophthalmic Surg and Lasers, 1999; 30: 47 51. 108 CZECH AND SLOVAK OPHTHALMOLOGY 3/2014