Japanese, Korean and Chinese subjects had also lived outside their respective countries for less than 10 years.

Similar documents
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Treatment A Placebo to match COREG CR 20 mg OD + Lisinopril 10 mg OD (Days 1-7) Placebo to match COREG CR 40 mg OD + Lisinopril 10 mg OD (Days 8-14)

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Subjects from the Safety Population who had GSK PK parameter estimates from any portion of the study. Cohort 1 (N=8)

Study No: LOV OMA-104 Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Statistical Methods

HM2008/00566/00. study and to obtain clinical experience with the use of this drug. Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): <Pharmacokinetics>

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

Study Population: 12 years and older A EF Calcipotriene Foam, 0.005%

Study Centers: This study was conducted in 2 centers in Italy.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Norgestimate/Ethinyl Estradiol and EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF Single Tablet Regimen

Study No: Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Statistical Methods:

mg 25 mg mg 25 mg mg 100 mg 1

Treatment B: FF (400 µg) and UMEC (250 µg)/vi(100 µg) The indicated dose is the total of four inhalations via the dry powder inhaler.

Study No Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

Study No Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Study Endpoints: Pharmacokinetics:

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

PFIZER INC. Study Initiation Date and Completion Dates: 09 March 2000 to 09 August 2001.

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

Clinical Study Synopsis

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of tadalafil/ tamsulosin HCl fixed-dose combination capsule under fasted and fed condition in healthy volunteers

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

GSK Medicine Study Number: Title: Rationale Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Clinical Study Synopsis

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Final Report (Amendment 1) April 11, 2006 Page 4 of 50

Study No: Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Statistical Methods: Sample Size

Pentoxifylline Extended-Release Tablets 400 mg

GSK Clincal Study Register

Clinical Study Synopsis

Principal Investigator: Marion, Alan, S, M.D., MDS Pharma Services (US) Inc., 621 Rose Street, PO Box 80837, Lincoln, NE 68502, USA

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

SYNOPSIS. Number of subjects: Planned: 22 Randomized: 23 Treated: 23. Evaluated: Pharmacodynamic: 22 Safety: 23 Pharmacokinetics: 22

Clinical Study Synopsis

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

PFIZER INC. Study Initiation Date and Completion Dates: Information not available (Date of Statistical Report: 16 May 2004)

Clinical Study Synopsis

SYNOPSIS OF RESEARCH REPORT (PROTOCOL BC20779)

Product: Cinacalcet hydrochloride Clinical Study Report: Page 2 of 670

These results are supplied for informational purposes only.

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Study No: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Sponsor: Sanofi Drug substance(s): SAR342434

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Insulin Glargine. Study Identifiers: NCT

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

090177e182b31c5d\0.1\Draft\Versioned On:16-Dec :12

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance: SAR236553/REGN727 (alirocumab)

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Results. Subject Disposition and Demographics Of 37 enrolled subjects, 23 (62.2%) completed the study

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study

Clinical Trial Results Summary Study EN

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended-Release Tablets M Clinical Study Report R&D/09/1109

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Clinical Study Synopsis

Effect of Daclatasvir/Asunaprevir/Beclabuvir in Fixed-dose Combination on the Pharmacokinetics of CYP450/Transporter Substrates In Healthy Subjects

PUBLIC ASSESSMENT REPORT Scientific Discussion

Principal Investigator: Robert J. Jones, MD, Beatson Cancer Center, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow; United Kingdom

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Title A Phase II study of oral LBH589 in adult patients with refractory cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Prurisol: A New Small Molecule under investigation for the treatment of Psoriasis

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1)

Ph D. Synopsis 4. WORK PLAN AND METHODOLOGY

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Insulin Glargine (HOE901) Insulin Glulisine (HMR1964)

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

SYNOPSIS Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI444031

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

SINGLE-DOSE AND STEADY-STATE PHARMACOKINETICS OF MOXDUO, A DUAL-OPIOID FORMULATION CONTAINING A FIXED RATIO OF MORPHINE AND OXYCODONE

Analysis of immunogenicity

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Photo (compulsory) Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 2. University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 3

SYNOPSIS. Issue Date: 31 July 2013

Transcription:

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product. Before prescribing any product mentioned in this Register, healthcare professionals should consult prescribing information for the product approved in their country. Study No: ARI114694 Title : An open-label, randomized, single dose, two-period crossover study to determine the bioavailability of a fixed dose combination capsule formulation of dutasteride and tamsulosin hydrochloride (0.5 mg/0.2 mg) relative to coadministration of dutasteride 0.5 mg capsules and tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.2 mg tablets in healthy male subjects of north east Asian and non-asian ancestry Rationale: The study was designed to assess the bioavailability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin hydrochloride (HCl) 0.2 mg, which is being developed for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients prescribed a combination therapy of both drugs in Japan and other East-Asian countries, relative to coadministration of separate commercial formulations of dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin HCl 0.2 mg in healthy Asian and non-asian subjects. Phase: I Study Period: The study was initiated on 10 September 2010 and completed on 21 December 2010. Study Design: Open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period crossover Centres: All subjects were enrolled and treated at 1 study centre in Australia. Indication: None Treatment: Subjects received concomitant single oral doses of tamsulosin HCl 0.2 mg and dutasteride 0.5 mg and a single oral dose of the FDC capsule (dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin HCl 0.2 mg), in a random sequence, either following a high-fat breakfast (, Regimens A and B, respectively) or in the fasted state (, Regimens C and D, respectively). Objectives: The primary objective was to investigate the bioavailability of a combination capsule formulation of dutasteride 0.5 mg/ tamsulosin hydrochloride (HCl) 0.2 mg relative to concomitant dosing of dutasteride 0.5 mg capsules and the Japan-sourced Harnal-D tamsulosin 0.2 mg tablets in the fed and fasted states Statistical Methods: The PK Parameter population comprised all subjects who provided data for one or more PK parameters. Dutasteride and tamsulosin PK parameters were derived from serum concentration-time data by noncompartmental methods. After loge transformation, AUC(0-t), AUC(0-inf) (for tamsulosin only) and Cmax in each dosing state (fed and fasted) were separately analyzed using a mixed effects model with fixed effect terms for period, ethnicity, treatment, and treatment by ethnicity interaction. Subjects were treated as a random effect in the model. Point estimates and their associated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed for the differences B A, D C, A C and B D and then backtransformed to provide point estimates and 90% CIs for the ratios B:A, D:C, A:C and B:D. Results for the same treatment comparisons were constructed for each ethnic group. Tmax in each dosing state (fed and fasted) was separately analyzed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon Matched Pairs method to compute point estimates and associated 90% CIs for the median differences B A and D C. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney method was used to compute point estimates and associated 90% CIs for the median differences A C and B D. The safety population included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Safety data were listed and summarized; no formal statistical analyses of the safety data were performed. Study Population: Healthy male subjects who were 20-45 years of age, inclusive, with a body mass index (BMI) of 18-30 kg/m2 (Caucasians) or 18-28 kg/m2 (East-Asians) were eligible to participate in the study. For Asian subjects, ethnicity was defined as follows: Japanese ancestry: subject was born in Japan, had four ethnic Japanese grandparents, held a Japanese passport or identity papers, and was able to speak Japanese, Korean ancestry: subject was born in Korea, had four ethnic Korean grandparents, held a Korean passport or identity papers, and was able to speak Korean, Chinese ancestry defined as being born in China, Hong Kong, Singapore or Taiwan, having four ethnic Chinese grandparents, holding a Chinese passport or identity papers and being able to speak Chinese. Japanese, Korean and Chinese subjects had also lived outside their respective countries for less than 10 years. Of the 86 enrolled subjects, 22 (26%) subjects were of Japanese ancestry (10 in, 12 in ), 9 (10%) subjects were of Chinese ancestry (4 in, 5 in ), and 13 (15%) subjects were of Korean ancestry (6 in, 7 in ), according to the above definition. The remaining 42 (49%) subjects (22 subjects in, 1

20 subjects in ), were classified as non-asian. Number of Subjects: Planned N 44 44 Dosed N 42 44 Completed n (%) 40 (95) 43 (98) Total Number Subjects Withdrawn N (%) 2 (5) 1 (2) Withdrawn due to Adverse Events n (%) 0 0 Withdrawn due to Lack of Efficacy n (%) 0 0 Withdrawn for Other Reasons n (%) 2 (5) 1 (2) Demographics N (ITT) 42 44 Females: Males 0: 42 0: 44 Mean Age in Years (sd) 27 (6) 28 (5) Mean Weight in Kg (sd) 73.4 (8.6) 71.3 (9.9) White n (%) 20 (48) 16 (36) Pharmacokinetics (PK): Selected serum PK parameters for dutasteride are summarized for all subjects in the table below. AUC(0-t) Cmax tmax Treatment N (ng hr /ml) 1 (ng/ml) 1 (hr) 2 A 41 41.9 2.18 3.00 (43.5) (36.7) (0.75-6.00) B 41 36.4 1.91 3.00 (77.6) (40.0) (1.00-6.00) C 43 44.6 2.43 2.00 (54.1) (42.5) (0.75-6.00) D 44 42. 2.28 2.00 (67.2) (47.5) (0.75-4.00) 1. Geometric mean (CVb%) 2. Median (range) 2

Selected serum PK parameters for tamsulosin are summarized for all subjects in the table below. AUC(0- ) AUC(0-t) Cmax t1/2 Tmax Treatment N (ng hr/ml) 1 (ng hr/ml) 1 (ng/ml) 1 (hr) 1 (hr) 2 A 41 61.5 59.8 4.14 10.7 6.00 (35.7) (36.8) (30.5) (21.4) (3.00-10.0) B 41 56.9 54.6 3.34 11.0 6.00 (37.3) (39.2) (35.7) (23.5) (3.00-10.0) C 4 70.5 68.3 6.28 9.70 4.00 (46.2) (47.5) (32.8) (34.9) (2.00-6.00) D 44 66.7 64.5 5.28 10.1 6.00 (41.1) (43.4) (37.1) (29.0) (3.00-8.00) 1. Geometric mean (CVb%) 2. Median (range) Summary results of the statistical analysis of dutasteride PK parameters are presented in the table below. The FDC capsule and coadministered commercial products were bioequivalent for dutasteride, based on Cmax and AUC(0-t) in the whole study population, in both the fed and fasted states. Parameter Comparison Least Squares Mean 1 90% Confidence (units) Test vs. Ref Test Ref Point Estimate 2 Interval CVw (%) B : A 36.83 39.35 0.94 (0.89, 0.98 ) AUC(0-t) D : C 41.69 43.99 0.95 (0.90, 1.00 ) (ng hr/ml) A : C 39.35 43.99 0.89 (0.72, 1.11 ) 13.71 B : D 36.83 41.69 0.88 (0.71, 1.09 ) B : A 1.92 2.17 0.89 (0.81, 0.97 ) Cmax (ng/ml) tmax (hr) D : C 2.27 2.42 0.94 (0.86, 1.02) A : C 2.17 2.42 0.89 (0.78, 1.03 ) B : D 1.92 2.27 0.85 (0.74, 0.97 ) B A 3 3 0.63 ( 0, 1.50) D C 2 2 0 ( 0, 0.50) A C 3 2 0 (0, 1.00) B D 3 2 1 (1.00, 2.00) Note: B:A and D:C comparisons are cross-over comparisons while A:C and B:D are parallel comparisons. Ref=Reference 1. Median reported for tmax. 2. Estimated difference reported for tmax. 23.80 -- 3

Summary results of the statistical analysis of tamsulosin PK parameters are presented in the table below. The FDC capsule and coadministered commercial products were not bioequivalent for tamsulosin. The FDC capsule and commercial products were equivalent in the whole study population under both dosing conditions based on AUC; however, Cmax values were approximately 15-20% lower for the FDC capsule compared to the commercial products in both the fed and fasted states. Parameter Comparison Least Squares Mean 1 90% Confidence (units) Test vs. Ref Test Ref Point Estimate 2 Interval CVw (%) B : A 57.23 61.30 0.93 (0.86, 1.01 ) AUC(0- ) (ng hr/ml) AUC(0-t) (ng hr/ml) Cmax (ng/ml) tmax (hr) D : C 66.71 70.87 0.94 (0.87, 1.01 ) A : C 61.30 70.87 0.86 (0.75, 1.00 ) B : D 57.23 66.71 0.86 (0.75, 0.99 ) B : A 54.93 59.50 0.92 (0.85, 1.00 ) D : C 64.46 68.78 0.94 (0.87, 1.01 ) A : C 59.50 68.78 0.87 (0.75, 1.00 ) B : D 54.93 64.46 0.85 (0.74, 0.99 ) B : A 3.34 4.14 0.81 (0.74, 0.88 ) D : C 5.29 6.27 0.84 (0.78, 0.92 ) A : C 4.14 6.27 0.66 (0.59, 0.74 ) B : D 3.34 5.29 0.63 (0.56, 0.71 ) B A 6 6 1.00 ( 0, 1.99) D C 6 4 1.00 (0.50, 1.50) A C 6 4 2 (1.00, 2.00) B D 6 6 2 (0, 2.00) Note: B:A and D:C comparisons are cross-over comparisons while A:C and B:D are parallel comparisons. Ref=Reference 1. Median reported for tmax. 2. Estimated difference reported for tmax. Safety results: An on-therapy adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as an AE/SAE with onset after the first dose of study medication and on or before the follow-up contact. The most frequently reported AEs (i.e., those occurring in >1 subject in the study) are summarized in the table below. Adverse Events: Regimen A Regimen B Regimen C Regimen D N (ITT) 41 41 43 44 No. subjects with AEs n (%) 14 (34) 14 (34) 16 (37) 16 (36) Most Frequent AEs Headache 6 (15) 4 (10) 7 (16) 5 (11) Dizziness postural 3 (7) 2 (5) 4 (9) 6 (14) Dizziness 2 (5) 3 (7) 4 (9) 3 (7) Abdominal discomfort 0 1 (2) 1 (2) 3 (7) Fatigue 0 0 3 (7) 0 Rhinorrhoea 0 2 (5) 1 (2) 0 Syncope 1 (2) 0 1 (2) 1 (2) Serious Adverse Events, n (%) [n considered by the investigator to be related, possibly related, or probably related to study medication]: No SAEs were reported during the study. 20.87 21.47 23.59 -- 4

5