Soil Testing Options in High Tunnels. Bruce Hoskins University of Maine anlab.umesci.maine.edu

Similar documents
Understanding a Soil Report

FACT SHEET. Understanding Cation Exchange Capacity and % Base Saturation

Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils

1101 S Winchester Blvd., Ste. G 173 San Jose, CA (408) (408) fax Page 1 of 2

Enclosed are the tissue analysis results for the samples from the greens at Golf Club.

Discuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a

SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION

Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management. Hailin Zhang. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

MEASURE AND MANAGE. Soiless Mixes, Testing and Nutrition Guidelines

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATION JIM FASCHING Technical Field Representative

Soil Conditions Favoring Micronutrient Deficiencies and Responses in 2001

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

Fertilization Programming

Nutrients & Diagnosing Nutrient Needs. Carrie Laboski Dept. of Soil Science UW-Madison

Soil 4234 Guest Lecture

Soil Composition. Air

Nutrient Recommendations Agronomic Crops Last Updated 12/1/16. Grain Corn. Crop Highlights Target ph: 6.0

Potassium and Phosphorus as Plant Nutrients. Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Potassium is required in large amounts by many crops

Nutrient level (EC) in a pot is like a bank

Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs

Soils and Soil Fertility Management

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

SOIL TESTS & INTERPRETATION

BOTANY AND PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION. MACRONUTRIENTS Found in air and water carbon C oxygen hydrogen

Principles of Orchard Nutrition. Kevin Manning and Ross Wilson AgFirst

Advanced ph management

DAFFODILS ARE WHAT THEY EAT: NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS OF SOILS

Understanding your results Acidity... 3 Aluminium... 3 Base saturation... 3 Boron... 4 Bulk density... 4 Calcium... 4 Cations...

Understanding Your Soil Report. Michael Cook 2018

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 3: Fertilizers

Animal, Plant & Soil Science. D3-7 Characteristics and Sources of Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients

FERTIGATION 24 FERTIGATION WITH DRIPPERS

Cranberry Nutrition: An A Z Guide. Joan R. Davenport Soil Scientist Washington State University

Soil Program Recommendation

Nutrient management irrigated corn. Jim Camberato

Trends in Soil Management for Turf. David C. Smith P.Ag DCS Agronomic Services

DOMOGRAN 45 ACTIVATING YOUR NUTRIENT POTENTIAL THE NITROGEN-SULFUR FERTILIZER FROM LEUNA

Pr gyp -TURF. a soil and turf fertility product. S E E S. f u.

Developing your Fertilizer Management Program. Outline. 2/6/2018. Other factors Species Correct site Weather Weed control. Soil physical properties

Soil Prescription - Sample 1

COMPUTATION & PREPARATION OF NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS. Principles, properties & preparation of nutrient solutions

Project: TopCal for sodium management during leaching at Mission Viejo Country Club

Introduction to Soil Minerals

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

A & L GREAT LAKES LABORATORIES, INC.

Plants, soil, and nutrients. Created in partnership with Alex Lindsey, Ph.D., The Ohio State University

USERS GUIDE for the. report

Evaluation of Manganese Fertility of Upland Cotton in the Lower Colorado Valley

Compost Analysis. Sustainable Soil Management with the Mikhail Balance System

Be sure to show all calculations so that you can receive partial credit for your work!

Multi-K. Potassium Nitrate Products For Healthy Crops

INTERPRETATION GUIDE TO SOIL TEST REPORTS

For nmental. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

Using Plant Sap Analysis to Optimize Nutrient Use Efficiency

May 2008 AG/Soils/ pr Understanding Your Soil Test Report Grant E. Cardon Jan Kotuby-Amacher Pam Hole Rich Koenig General Information

Table 1. Plant Nutrients. Nutrients From Air & Water Primary Macronutrients

Nutrient Management in Ornamental Production

Greenhouse Horticulture

FERTILIZING GREENHOUSE CROPS

Common Salt Ions. Salinity. Soil permeability reflects sodicity problems from sodium concentrations 1/15/2008

Plant, Soil, and Nutrients

FACTORS AFFECTING WATER QUALITY

Quick Tips for Nutrient Management in Washington Berry Crops. Lisa Wasko DeVetter Assistant Professor, Small Fruit Horticulture March 16, 2016

RELIABILITY OF SOIL AND PLANT ANALYSES FOR MAKING NUTRIENT RECOMMENDATIONS

Importance of Water Quality: ph, buffering, and effects on nutrient availability

Advanced Liner Nutrient Management

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

FERTILIZING. Correct time is during October and November. Sample young, fully developed, hardened off leaves.

Nutrient Management for Texas High Plains Cotton Production

By Andrew & Erin Oxford, Bethel

Mineral Nutrition of Fruit & Nut Trees. Fruit & Nut Tree Nutrition 3/1/2013. Johnson - Nutrition 1

Nutrition in Container Crops. Dr. James Altland

Importance of fertigation scheduling

Fertilizer Proper Selection and Use. J.B. Sartain University of Florida Gainesville, FL

Fertility management in soybean

Nutrient Management of Container Nursery Crops

Gerald Brust IPM Vegetable Specialist. Vegetable Fertility

Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Plant Food. Nitrogen (N)

Citrus Nutrition Research Leading to Revised Fertilzier Recommendations for HLB-affected

2010 Course 6. Dan Kittredge

Welcome. Greg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories

How to Develop a Balanced Program for Pecan and Chili. Robert R Smith

Nutrient Management for Texas High Plains Cotton Production

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

Larry Stein, Texas A & M AgriLife Extension Service. Nitrogen fertilization materials, rates and timing

Soil Testing and Interpretation

Objectives: 1. Determine the effect of nitrogen and potassium applications on sugar beet root yield and quality.

2009 Elba Muck Soil Nutrient Survey Results Summary, Part III: Calcium, Magnesium and Micronutrients

Keywords: hydroponic, media, soilless culture, zeolite

INTERPRETING SOIL & LEAF ANALYSIS

1

TNPSC Chemistry Study Material Fertilizers

Soil fertility and fertilizers for wild blueberry production

Biosolids Nutrien Management an Soil Testing. Craig Cogger, Soil Scientis WSU Puyallup

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

Monitoring & Maintaining the ph and EC of the Root Environment. Bill Fonteno Horticultural Substrates Laboratory NC State University

Nutrition of Horticultural Crops. Monica Ozores-Hampton University of Florida/IFAS/SWFREC Spring 2013

Strategies for Managing Vine Nutrition

Transcription:

Soil Testing Options in High Tunnels Bruce Hoskins University of Maine hoskins@maine.edu anlab.umesci.maine.edu

High Tunnel Project Yields (avg. yield ~ 3000 lb/1000 sq. ft. => 65 tons/a) Calculated (lb/a) fruit content => 180 N, 30 P, 400-500 K

Unique System Rely on basic soil fertility, as with open field Enhanced daytime air temperature Faster growth rates from more heat units Greater heat gain in soil with black plastic Enhanced mineralization of organic nutrient sources No natural rainfall water must be supplied Better disease control Allows fertigation

Unique Problems Temperature Extremes Requires ventilation May aggravate insect problems Faster growth rates worsen nutrient deficiencies Nutrient salt buildup Faster mineralization, especially under black plastic Carryover of available nitrogen (Nitrate) Enhanced evaporation wicks salts to the surface No natural rainfall to wash (leach) excess nutrients Irrigation usually not sufficient to leach excess salts Evaporation + Transpiration > = Water input

Similar to field production in Irrigated Desert

Soil-Soil Water-Root Relationships Most nutrient uptake as water-soluble ions (+) charge cations (Ca +2 K +1 Mg +2 ) (-) charge anions (NO 3-1 H 2 PO 4-1 SO 4-2 ) Small proportion of total in solution at any time Replenished as solution levels are depleted From cation exchange sites (Ca K Mg) From stable compounds or complexes (P S) From microbial activity/mineralization (N P)

Field Soil Test Traditional soil fertility test Capacity to supply nutrients over entire season Treats soil as a nutrient storehouse Extracts a quantity of available nutrients Correlates well with uptake and yield for the season Regional tests Specific to mineralogy, climate, and nutrient chemistry Morgan/ modified Morgan (ph 4.8) Mehlich 3 (ph 2.5) Olsen + Ammonium acetate (ph7)

Appropriate Testing System for High Tunnels Startup houses Essentially same as open-field soil management Routine field soil test most appropriate Optimize ph, OM, major & micronutrient reserves

Appropriate Testing System for High Tunnels Established houses (1 + years) Salt buildup can be a problem if not uncovered Monitor total salt level to avoid dessication damage Open field soil N management does not apply Monitor nitrate level to avoid over-fertilizing

Hoop House/High Tunnel Package hybrid test 1 Field soil test to address potential deficiencies EC (SME) to monitor total nutrient salt buildup Available nitrogen to address nitrate buildup

Saturated Media Extracts Common Uses 1) Where nutrients applied as water-soluble fertilizers Conventional greenhouse bench crops 2) Where nutrient content exceeds retention capacity High proportion of free salts Soils with accumulated nutrient salts Irrigated desert soils Long-term high tunnels

Saturated Media Extraction - Add water in a closed vessel just to saturation pt. - Automatically accounts for moisture retention - Constant relationship to field capacity (roughly 2X)

Water added at saturation (as % dry soil) Sandy loam: 20 35 % added water Silt loam: 35 50 % added water Organic mixes: > 80 % added water

Long-Term High Tunnel Package hybrid test 2 Continuously-covered houses, usually 3+ years Saturated Media Extraction + Organic matter Water soluble (nutrient intensity) mgt. system UVM interpretation guidelines N-P-K recommendations to adjust SME levels UVM guidelines

Optimum SME Ranges Greenhouse Media (Warnke) NO 3 -N 100 200 ppm P 6 10 ppm K 150 250 ppm Ca > 200 ppm Mg > 70 ppm EC 2.0 3.5 mmhos GH Tomato/Cuke (Wittwer & Honma) ph 5.8 6.8 NO 3 -N 125 200 ppm P 8 13 ppm K 175 275 ppm Ca > 250 ppm Mg > 60 ppm EC 1.5 3.0 mmhos

Optimum SME Ranges GH Tomato/Cuke (Wittwer & Honma) ph 5.8 6.8 NO 3 -N 125 200 ppm P 8 13 ppm K 175 275 ppm Ca > 250 ppm Mg > 60 ppm EC 1.5 3.0 mmhos Current High Tunnel (ME & VT) ph 6.0 7.0 NO 3 -N 100 200 ppm P 1 5 ppm K 150 275 ppm Ca > 250 ppm Mg > 60 ppm EC 2.0 4.0 mmhos

Estimated fertilizer rates to increase SME nutrient levels Pounds/1,000 sq. ft needed to raise N approximately 10 ppm Blood meal 12-0-0 4.2 Soybean meal 7-1-2 7.2 Alfalfa meal 2.5-2-2 20.2 Pounds/1,000 sq. ft needed to raise P approximately 2 ppm Bone char 0-16-0 25 Rock phosphate 0-3-0 133 Pounds/1,000 sq. ft needed to raise K approximately 20 ppm Sul-Po-Mag 0-0-22-11Mg 2.6 Potassium sulfate 0-0-52 1.1 Alfalfa meal 2.5-2-2 28.6 Pounds/1,000 sq. ft needed to raise Ca approximately 25 ppm Calcium sulfate (gypsum) 7.5 Calcitic lime (low Mag) 7.5 Dolomitic lime (hi Mag) 5.3 Adapted from Wittwer & Honma

2011 High Tunnel Calibration Project Pre-plant Analysis Soil Extract Comparison Field Soil vs SME Field Soil Test Dry soil (mg/kg) ID NO3-N P K Mg Ca Na B S Cu Fe Mn Zn R1 116 402 160 1077 12193 176 1.8 357 0.33 7.0 20 13 R2 86 362 154 1074 11074 162 1.7 395 0.35 6.8 19 11 R3 85 383 243 1253 12306 232 1.9 788 0.31 7.9 18 12 R4 117 327 159 988 10847 196 1.5 552 0.29 6.5 15 16 R5 75 319 109 949 11088 105 1.6 204 0.30 5.6 20 12 R6 98 354 126 1043 11489 150 1.6 336 0.27 6.6 19 12 CV -> 18.1 8.9 29.2 9.9 5.4 25.3 8.1 46.6 9.3 11.1 8.9 12.4 Mean-> 96 358 158 1064 11499 170 1.7 439 0.31 6.7 18 13 Ideal -> 30-50 10-20 275-400 250-450 2000-3000 < 200 0.5-1.5 > 25 0.25-0.6 6-10 5-10 1-2 Rating-> High V High Medium V High V High OK High V High OK OK High V High SME Test Extract (mg/l) ID NO3-N P K Mg Ca Na B S Cu Fe Mn Zn R1 86 3.3 16 82 233 77 0.06 179 0.013 1.3 0.13 0.04 R2 75 3.9 21 140 400 104 0.08 407 0.029 2.1 0.20 0.05 R3 70 3.9 49 169 502 140 0.09 524 0.037 1.4 0.10 0.04 R4 105 3.9 28 151 532 130 0.08 485 0.007 2.1 0.15 0.07 R5 68 3.0 9 85 264 55 0.06 210 0.021 1.3 0.12 0.03 R6 76 3.0 9 98 301 70 0.05 257 0.030 1.7 0.13 0.03 CV -> 17.1 12.5 61.4 29.6 32.6 33.9 20.9 40.9 52.9 23.1 24.5 32.7 Mean-> 81 3.6 25 125 386 101 0.07 361 0.021 1.6 0.14 0.05 Ideal -> 100-200 1-5 150-275 > 60 > 250 < 100 0.05-0.50 25-50 0.01-0.5 0.3-5.0 0.1-3.0 0.3-3.0 Rating-> Medium Optimum Low Optimum Optimum OK Optimum V High OK OK OK Low

Soil Extract Comparison Field Soil vs SME Fundamental differences in nutrient pools Exchangeable/extractable vs water soluble (Q vs I) Low quantity = Low intensity Opt/High Quantity may not reflect in Intensity Differences in reporting basis - Dry soil basis (mg/kg) vs extract concentration (mg/l) - Reflected in NO3-N levels SME = variable dilution factor

Current Status High Tunnel Soil Testing For newer houses, routine field soil analysis with additional checks on EC and available nitrogen works well. Continuously covered high-ec houses can be effectively managed using SME testing system. Field soil and SME testing systems access greatly different pools for most nutrients and are reported on a different basis. Each requires discreet interpretation and recommendation systems. Attempts to verify and/or recalibrate existing SME guidelines had limited success. Further studies are needed on lower fertility soils over a full season.

Questions?