Classroom Acoustics. Classroom Acoustics Slides 2005 [G ABP Sales Training CES Presentations Classroom Acoustics 2005]

Similar documents
The Benefits and Challenges of Amplification in Classrooms.

CLASSROOM AMPLIFICATION: WHO CARES? AND WHY SHOULD WE? James Blair and Jeffery Larsen Utah State University ASHA, San Diego, 2011

Classroom Acoustics January 13, Aural Rehabilitation University of Mississippi. David S. Woolworth Oxford Acoustics

CLASSROOM HEARING AND SOUND ENHANCEMENT. A White Paper of Audio Enhancement Co.

Contents THINK ACOUSTICS FIRST NOT LAST WHO BENEFITS FROM IMPROVED ACOUSTICS?

Effects of Aircraft Noise on Student Learning

Eliminating Acoustical Barriers to Learning in Classrooms

ARE YOUR STUDENTS HEARING YOU?

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD

Speech Privacy Systems

Four important facts:

Survey on sound environment in classrooms during school hours for hearing impaired students

Association of Australian Acoustical Consultants Guideline for Educational Facilities Acoustics. September 2010

MEMO. Authorization to Purchase Acoustic Panel Material Operations Building

Acoustical Quality Assessment of Lecture halls at Lund University, Sweden

wise to understand how the new standard will affect school design and classroom functionality. ANSI/ASA S

Classroom acoustics for vocal health of elementary school teachers

Ultrasonic Flow Meter Best Practices for commissioning and Balancing

Please refer to the body corporate s registered bylaws in relation to domestic noise.

THE CONTROL OF NOISE AT WORK REGULATIONS Guidance for Pub and Bar Operators

NOAH Sound Equipment Guideline

Acoustics. How glazing can help reduce noise entering the home

The Essex Study Optimised classroom acoustics for all

My child with a cochlear implant (CI)

APPENDIX D NOISE SCALES/MEASUREMENT DEFINITIONS

Classroom Acoustics Research

Listen Up: Breaking Classroom Sound Barriers with a Complete AV Solution

Classroom Acoustics booklet, from the Acoustical Society of America's. Classroom Acoustics booklet, from the Acoustical Society of America's

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Carol De Filippo. Viet Nam Teacher Education Institute June 2010

WHEN BB93 JUST ISN T GOOD ENOUGH - SCHOOL ACOUSTICS DESIGN FOR EXCELLENCE.

Welcome!! Dickinson + Partners Uniting Education, Special Needs & Architecture

Informal Functional Hearing Evaluation (IFHE)

Informal Functional Hearing Evaluation (IFHE)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Dharma Raj Paudel, Lecturer, Department of Physics, Midwestern University, Surkhet, Nepal.

ASSOCIATIONS OF ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT WITH PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AMONG HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS IN GENERAL HOSPITAL WARDS

Pictures for illustration purposes only. Hearing loop solutions. Selecting the best solution for your requirement

APPENDIX G NOISE TERMINOLOGY

Solving the Workplace Speech Privacy Crisis

Roger Dynamic SoundField A new era in classroom amplification

Informal Functional Hearing Evaluation (IFHE)

Understanding Sound for HVAC Equipment

The Residence Inn Hotel at 2 nd and Mace

American Academy of Audiology Clinical Practice Guidelines

A new era in classroom amplification

A presentation adapted from a Powerpoint by Juliëtte Sterkens, AuD Audiologist, HLAA National Hearing Loop Advocate

Basic Environmental Noise and Noise Perception. 4-Feb-16

Auditory Processing. Teach Inclusive Chapter 4, March Catherine Silcock, Speech Pathologist

Laborers. Construction Industry Noise Exposures. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences

INTRODUCTION TO PURE (AUDIOMETER & TESTING ENVIRONMENT) TONE AUDIOMETERY. By Mrs. Wedad Alhudaib with many thanks to Mrs.

SPEECH PERCEPTION IN A 3-D WORLD

Advocating for the Needs of the Oral Deaf Student

Safety Services Guidance. Occupational Noise

HAT Process: Determining HAT for a Student

Contents. 1) Purpose ) Policy ) Definitions ) Procedure a) Requirements b) Noise standard... 4

Further Thoughts on Sound Masking Robert Chanaud, Ph.D.

Interact-AS. Use handwriting, typing and/or speech input. The most recently spoken phrase is shown in the top box

ACCESSIBILITY CHECKLIST FOR EVENT PLANNING

Construction Industry Noise Exposures. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences

Hearing Conservation Program

Lindsay De Souza M.Cl.Sc AUD Candidate University of Western Ontario: School of Communication Sciences and Disorders

Noise 101. Sources Metrics Noise Modeling Federal Statutes. O Hare Noise Compatibility Commission. June 16, 2017

Appendix E: Basics of Noise. Table of Contents

Santa Clarita Community College District HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Revised

Review of Methods for Quantifying Tonalness in Noise. Quantifying Tonalness

SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY S WRITTEN HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM December 2017

Amigo Star. Insert photos matching the introduction paragraph of the literature review

Construction Industry Noise Exposures. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences

A case study of construction noise exposure for preserving worker s hearing in Egypt

An analysis of acoustical effectiveness in the design of lecture hall spaces for teaching-learning: The case of Niger Delta University

A Pilot Study on the Acoustic Environment in Early Childhood Centres

Making Connections: Early Detection Hearing and Intervention through the Medical Home Model Podcast Series

Tony Gray Head of Safety, Security and Resilience

Project: COOK ISLAND CHRISTIAN CHURCH. Prepared for: Cook Island Christian Church 34 Dunbeath Crescent Kew Invercargill Attention: Tina Maine

Roger Dynamic SoundField. A new era in classroom amplification

Background noise level to determine the speech privacy in open plan offices

Noise Ordinance Update. Public Services and Infrastructure Committee 2/22/2018

Hearing Conservation Program

NC Employees Workplace Program Requirements for Safety and Health. Hearing Conservation

Classroom Acoustics - A New Zealand Perspective

1. What is Noise and why do we care about it?

Nova 3 Noise Attenuation Study

Construction Industry Noise Exposures. Construction Industry Noise Exposures

Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003

HOW TO USE THE SHURE MXA910 CEILING ARRAY MICROPHONE FOR VOICE LIFT

ALL ACOUSTICS IN ONE PLACE

Environment CAUTION HEARING PROTECTION REQUIRED. Occupational Noise Exposure Requirements for Photographic Processing Facilities

Roger TM. Learning without limits. SoundField for education

Noise Monitoring. T. Renée Anthony, PhD, CIH, CSP University of Iowa, College of Public Health

Hearing Conservation Program

May 03, 2010 Rosalyn Sutley

Chapter 3. Sounds, Signals, and Studio Acoustics

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY SUPPLY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

ACOUSTIC INFRASOUND AND LOW-FREQUENCY SOUND

Effects of speaker's and listener's environments on speech intelligibili annoyance. Author(s)Kubo, Rieko; Morikawa, Daisuke; Akag

To learn more, visit the website and see the Find Out More section at the end of this booklet.

ARCHIVE. Scottish Health Technical Memorandum 2045 (Part 4 of 4) Audiology. Acoustics

Roger TM Plug in, turn on and teach. Dynamic SoundField

Helping Families Achieve the Best Outcome for their Child with a Cochlear Implant

Transcription:

Classroom Acoustics This program is registered with the AIA/CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that might be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation. Classroom Acoustics Slides 2005 [G ABP Sales Training CES Presentations Classroom Acoustics 2005]

Classroom Acoustics Seminar Review how acoustical design and sound quality impact the learning environment. Explain ANSI Standard S12.60-2002 for classroom acoustics. Identify sound reverberation and background noise reduction techniques for classrooms. Discuss how to create a better learning environment through improved classroom design. 2

Is Noise A Problem? 28% of our nation s schools list noise as the #1 problem. Noise causes students to miss one-third of spoken communication in class. Noise interferes with speech intelligibility. The effort to counter noise creates vocal fatigue in teachers. Source: Coalition For Classroom Acoustics 3

Is Noise A Problem? Noise affects children: Visual or hearing impairments. Attention Deficit Disorder [ADD]. English as a Second Language [ESL]. Learning disorders. Middle-ear infections. Younger children learning the language. 4

The Effect Of A Hearing Loss Due to middle-ear infections, school-aged children commonly experience a 25 decibel loss. Place your hand over your ear to experience this level of hearing loss. 5

Benefit: Reduced Teacher Absenteeism Vocal Strain A Costly Concern There were 2.9 million public school teachers in the U.S. in 2000. Teachers lose an average of two days per year for vocal fatigue. Cost for substitute teachers was about $220 per day. The national cost for teacher vocal fatigue is estimated at $638 million. A large fraction of that cost could be saved each year if schools were quieter. Source: Acoustical Society of America 6

How Will Acoustical Standards Help? Standards can make possible: An improved learning environment for all students. Improved speech intelligibility for all students and teachers. A better teaching environment for teachers. Uniformity in classroom design for architects and designers. 7

The ADA s Involvement In Speech Intelligibility The ADA, along with the Access Board, is making efforts to apply specific requirements on classroom acoustics. ADA requires that communications with persons with disabilities be as effective as communications with others. [Americans with Disabilities Act, Public Law 101-336, Title III, Section 36.303. Auxiliary Aids and Services] 8

Standard Development Process Timeline 1997 Parents petitioned Access Board to have classroom standard developed. 1998 Draft of standard submitted to Access Board for review. 1998 Access Board issued Request For Information [RFI] on the subject. 2000 Various groups developed standard [March-June]. 2001 Board received proposed standard [January]. 2002 Standard completed and approved as ANSI/ASA S12.60-2002, Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements and Guidelines for Schools. 2003 ANSI Standard for Classroom Acoustics adopted in various districts throughout the United States. 9

ANSI Standard Adoption An Update Currently adopted: New York City Department of School Construction. New Jersey School Construction Authority. Minneapolis Public Schools. New Hampshire Department of Education. Ohio s School Facility Commission. States with pre-existing comparable requirements: Washington State Education Department. NY State Department of Education. Other states: Minnesota Department of Education proposing own. Connecticut considering adoption. Minnesota considering adoption. California high-performing school recommendation [CHPS]. 10

Who Helped Develop The Standards? Acousticians Advocates for People with Disabilities Architects ASTM Standards Group Audiologists Contractors Government Agencies Manufacturers Noise Engineers Speech Language Pathologists Specification Writers Teachers 11

Organizations That Helped Develop The Standards AAA AFT AG BELL AIA ANSI ASA ASHA ASHRAE ASTM ATBCB CEFPI CISCA CRI CSI Department of Education EAA GA INCE Manufacturers of Construction Materials NAIMA SHHH 12

ANSI Standard Video Featuring: What s the ANSI Standard S12.60-2002 all about? Dr. Kenneth Roy, PhD. Donna Ellis, architect, formerly with the Washington DC Public School District 13

New Standard Requirements 1. For reverberation time: Rooms less than 10,000 cubic feet: 0.6 seconds Rooms 10,000-20,000 cubic feet: 0.7 seconds Studies show: Some classrooms today have reverberation times as high as 2.8 seconds. 14

Sound In Rooms Black arrows are direct sound. [Direct sound is good for intelligibility.] Red arrows are reflected sound. [Reflected sound might compromise intelligibility.] 15

Reducing Reflected Sound When you reduce reflected sound, you lower the reverberation time. Treat the room with high NRC acoustical walls and high NRC ceilings. 16

Cost Benefit Ratio: Upgraded Ceiling Costs Installed Cost Guide: 1000 SF Classroom [20' x 50'] Ceiling Description Installed Cost Difference/ Classroom Annual Cost* NRC 0.55 24" x 48" x ⅝" no sag resistance $1250 $1500 NRC 0.55 24" x 48" x ⅝" cleaner visual sag resistance $1300 $1550 $50 $5 NRC 0.55 24" x 48" x ⅝" sag resistance higher durability $1600 $1800 $300 $30 NRC 0.70 24" x 48" x ¾" sag resistance superior acoustics $1750 $2000 $500 $50 *Products have a 10-year life/panel warranty. 17

New Standard Requirements 2. For background noise level: Core learning spaces equal to or less than 20,000 cubic feet, reduce the background noise level to a maximum 35 dba. Studies show: Some classrooms today have background noise levels as high as 66 dba. 18

Background Noise Background noise is the effect of all sound sources, from both outside and inside the classroom, but excluding students and teacher. High levels of background noise can mask speech sounds, thus reducing speech intelligibility. Background noise is measured in dba. 19

Sources Of Background Noise 20

Reduce Noise Traveling Through The Plenum 21

Reduce Noise Traveling Through The Walls 22

Minimize HVAC Noise Through Design Place no mechanical equipment in the classroom. Variable air volume boxes must be located away from the classroom. HVAC units should be completely isolated from the classroom. Duct attenuators should be placed upstream in the duct work. 23

Real-World Case Study #1 Second Grade Classroom All hard surfaces. High plaster ceiling [14'6"]. Located outside the cafeteria. Large windows facing the playground. Children had difficulty understanding the teacher and each other. 24

Real-World Case Study #1 Method Of Evaluation Measure the loudness of classroom while occupied [reading class]. Measure reverberation time in empty classroom after school. Install 0.65 NRC glue-up ceiling board during holiday break. Repeat above measurements after installation. 25

Real-World Case Study #1 Classroom Layout Closet Door Ceiling Height 14'6" Room Volume ~ 9000 cubic feet Speaker 23' Closets and Sink Teacher Desk Student Desks Microphone Computer Station windows adjacent to playground along this wall 27' 26

Real-World Case Study #1 Maximum Sound Levels Results Classroom SPL Before and After Treatment Levels Exceeded Only 5% of Time During Reading Class 90.0 80.0 Before Treatment After Treatment Sound Pressure Level, db 70.0 60.0 50.0 Before 40.0 30.0 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1000 1250 1600 2000 2500 3150 4000 5000 Frequency, Hz After 27

Real-World Case Study #1 Background Noise Levels Results 60 50 Classroom SPL After Treatment Minimum Levels and Levels Exceeded 95% of Time During Reading Class Exceeded 95% of Time Minimum Sound Pressure Level, db 40 35 30 20 35 db Before 10 0 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1000 1250 1600 2000 2500 3150 4000 5000 Frequency, Hz 28 After

Real-World Case Study #1 Reverberation Times Reverberation Times Before and After Treatment 1.8 1.6 Before Treatment After Treatment Reverberation Time, sec/60 db 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Open markers indicate data points which don't meet ASTM C423-99a 0.6 sec Before After 0.0 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1000 1250 1600 2000 2500 3150 4000 5000 Frequency, Hz 29

Real-World Case Study #2 Classroom Acoustics Demonstration Lamberton School, Philadelphia PA The Architecture: Built in 1949. K-12 grades. Quiet residential area. Masonry construction. Ceilings are spray-applied fiberglass insulation on plaster. Floors are vinyl tile. Acoustic evaluations and ceiling installation performed January 15-24, 2004. 30

Classroom Before Change Architecture: before change Ceiling: Spray-up fiberglass insulation approximately ½" thick on plaster. Walls: CMU [concrete block] and DS [double strength] glass. Floor: Solid vinyl tile. Room Dimensions: 24' x 44' x 11. Acoustical Design Criteria For Classrooms ANSI S12.60 reverberation time, maximum acceptable 0.6 seconds [at 500, 1000, 2000 Hz] Lamberton Classroom Reverberation Time Measured performance before change 1.1 seconds [average 500 to 2000 Hz] 31

Reverberation Before Change Architecture: before change Ceiling: Spray-up fiberglass insulation approximately ½" thick on plaster. Walls: CMU and DS glass. Floor: Solid vinyl tile. 2.5 Lamberton School Classroom 101, before Ceiling change The highlighted frequencies represent ANSI S12.60 [at 500, 1000, 2000 Hz]. Max. 0.6 seconds Reverberation Time, seconds 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1k Rev Time, sec 2.4 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.68 1.47 1.42 1.3 1.25 1.17 1.09 0.98 0.93 0.85 0.77 0.68 0.62 0.56 0.51 0.45 0.39 The The classroom classroom fails fails to to meet meet reverberation reverberation time time per per the the ANSI ANSI standard standard at at all all three three frequencies frequencies [highlighted]. [highlighted]. Reverberation Reverberation isn t isn t uniform, uniform, and and speech speech sounds sounds boomy. boomy. 32 1.25 k Frequency, 1/3 OB 1.6k 2k 2.5k 3.15 k 4k 5k 6.3k 8k 10k

Classroom With New Ceiling Architecture: after change Ceiling: Suspended ceiling, high NRC/high CAC, ¾" mineral fiber panels Walls: Floor: CMU and DS glass. Solid vinyl tile. Room Dimensions: 24' x 44' x 10. Acoustical Design Criteria For Classrooms ANSI S12.60 reverberation time, maximum acceptable 0.6 seconds [at 500, 1000, 2000 Hz] Lamberton Classroom Reverberation Time Measured performance after change 0.56 seconds [average 500-2000Hz] 33

Reverberation After New Ceiling Architecture: after change Ceiling: Walls: Floor: Suspended ceiling, high NRC/high CAC ¾" mineral fiber panels. CMU and DS glass. Solid vinyl tile. 2.5 Lamberton School Classroom 101, after Ceiling change 2 The highlighted frequencies represent ANSI S12.60 [at 500, 1000, 2000 Hz]. Max. 0.6 seconds Reverberation Time, seconds 1.5 1 0.5 0 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1k 1.25k 1.6k 2k 2.5k 3.15k 4k 5k 6.3k 8k 10k Rev Time, sec 0.925 1.02 0.76 0.86 0.78 0.65 0.62 0.6 0.62 0.62 0.56 0.54 0.55 0.52 0.53 0.46 0.47 0.43 0.39 0.36 0.33 Frequency, 1/3 OB The The classroom classroom now now meets meets reverberation reverberation time time per per the the ANSI ANSI standard standardat at all all three three frequencies frequencies [highlighted]. [highlighted]. Reverberation Reverberation is is uniform, uniform, and and speech speech sounds sounds natural. natural. 34

Comparison Of Reverberation Time Before After Ceiling Spray-up fiberglass insulation. Approximately ½" thick. Approximate NRC 0.25. Ceiling Suspended ceiling. High NRC 0.70/high CAC 40. ¾" mineral fiber panels. Ref. ANSI S12.60, 0.6 seconds max. 500 Hz, 1.3 seconds 1000 Hz, 1.09 seconds 2000 Hz, 0.85 seconds Ref. ANSI S12.60, 0.6 seconds max. 500 Hz, 0.60 seconds 1000 Hz, 0.56 seconds 2000 Hz, 0.52 seconds The The before before classroom classroom did did not notmeet the the ANSI ANSI standard standard for for reverberation reverberation time time at at all all three three frequencies. frequencies. The The new new after after ceiling ceiling meets meets the the standard standard at at all all three three frequencies. frequencies. 35

Where Can I Find Out More? Classroom Acoustics Brochure from the Acoustical Society of America can be downloaded from: http://asa.aip.org/classroom/booklet.html ANSI S12.60-2002 can be ordered from: http://asa.aip.org/ http://www.ansi.org/ Go to the Standards Store at either site. Quiet in the Classroom can be downloaded from: http://www.armstrong.com/schools 36

Summary We ve reviewed: How sound impacts the learning environment. How choosing the appropriate acoustical ceiling can reduce sound reverberation and background noise in the classroom. How ANSI Standard S12.60 affects classroom design. How to create a better learning environment through improved classroom design. 37