IAEA/AAPM code of practice for the dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy

Similar documents
IAEA/AAPM Code of Practice for the Dosimetry of Static Small Photon Fields. Jan Seuntjens McGill University Montréal, Canada

Karen E. Christaki and Ahmed Meghzifene Dosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, A-1400 Vienna, Austria

Dosimetry of Small Static Fields Used in External Beam Radiotherapy

Small Field Dosimetry

Mania Aspradakis John Byrne Hugo Palmans John Conway Jim Warrington Karen Rosser Simon Duane

Dosimetric Uncertainties in Reference and Relative Dosimetry of Small Fields

Small Field Dosimetry: Overview of AAPM TG-155 and the IAEA-AAPM Code of Practice (Therapy)

Small Field Dosimetry Issues: Theory, Calibration and Treatment Planning

Much of what we will say

Detector comparison for small field output factor measurements with flattening filter free photon beams

8/2/2018. Disclosures. In ICRU91: SRT = {SBRT/SABR, SRS}

Small Field Dosimetry: An Overview of Reference and Relative Dosimetry in Non-Equilibrium Condition

Beam Quality Effects in Nonstandard Fields of the Varian TrueBeam

Calibration of dosimeters for small mega voltage photon fields at ARPANSA

PRECISE DOSIMETRY OF SMALL PHOTON BEAMS COLLIMATED BY AN ADD-ON DYNAMIC MICRO-MULTILEAVES COLLIMATOR.

Small Field Dosimetry: Overview of AAPM TG-155 and the IAEA-AAPM Code of Practice (Therapy) What is a Small Field? Indra J. Das/ Small Fields (Page-1)

Ion recombination corrections of ionization chambers in flattening filter-free photon radiation

Small field detector correction factors: effects of the flattening filter for Elekta and Varian linear accelerators

AAPM TG178: Towards the Recommendation of a Standard Dosimetry Protocol for Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Traceability and absorbed dose standards for small fields, IMRT and helical tomotherapy

Application(s) of Alanine

How accurately can we measure dose clinically? Accurate clinical dosimetry. Dosimetric accuracy requirement

MEASUREMENT OF TMR AND PDD PROFILES IN SMALL FIELDS. SB Crowe, E Whittle, C Jones, T Kairn

Plan-Specific Correction Factors for Small- Volume Ion Chamber Dosimetry in Modulated Treatments on a Varian Trilogy

Practical Reference Dosimetry Course April 2015 PRDC Program, at a glance. Version 1.0. Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4

Basic dosimetric data for treatment planning system

4 Essentials of CK Physics 8/2/2012. SRS using the CyberKnife. Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest

Small-Field Dosimetry: Its Importance In Clinic

Recent advances in dosimetry in reference conditions for proton and light-ion beams

3D printing of air slab caps for correction free small field dosimetry. Benjamin Perrett, Paul Charles, Tim Markwell, Tanya Kairn, Scott Crowe

On the impact of ICRU report 90 recommendations on k Q factors for high-energy photon beams

An Independent Audit and Analysis of Small Field Dosimetry Quality Assurance. David Followill IROC Houston QA Center

Hot Topics in SRS: Small Field Dosimetry & Other Treatment Uncertainties. Sonja Dieterich, PhD University of California Davis

Progress Report on Radiation Dosimetry at NPL

Dosimetry and QA of proton and heavier ion beams

DOSIMETRIC COMPARISION FOR RADIATION QUALITY IN HIGH ENERGY PHOTON BEAMS

Small field diode dosimetry

Semiflex 3D. Always perfectly oriented. 3D Thimble Ionization Chamber for Relative and Absolute Dosimetry

The Journey of Cyberknife Commissioning

SRS/SBRT Errors and Causes

Topics covered 7/21/2014. Radiation Dosimetry for Proton Therapy

Semiflex 3D. Always perfectly oriented. 3D Thimble Ionization Chamber for Relative and Absolute Dosimetry

Disclosure. Outline. Machine Overview. I have received honoraria from Accuray in the past. I have had travel expenses paid by Accuray in the past.

How accurately can we measure dose clinically? Dosimetric accuracy requirement. Accurate Clinical dosimetry. Part I: Fundamentals and Issues

PMP. Use of Cylindrical Chambers as Substitutes for Parallel- Plate Chambers in Low-Energy Electron Dosimetry. Original Article.

Out-of-field doses of CyberKnife in stereotactic radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients

Applications of Monte Carlo simulations to radiation dosimetry

Introduction. Measurement of Secondary Radiation for Electron and Proton Accelerators. Introduction - Photons. Introduction - Neutrons.

Standard calibration of ionization chambers used in radiation therapy dosimetry and evaluation of uncertainties

Assessment of Dosimetric Functions of An Equinox 100 Telecobalt Machine

Clinical Implementation of SRS/SBRT

INTRODUCTION. Material and Methods

STEREOTACTIC DOSE VERIFICATION PHANTOM VERSATILE STEREOTACTIC QA PHANTOMS

Verification of Relative Output Factor (ROF) Measurement for Radiosurgery Small Photon Beams

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 4, NUMBER 4, FALL 2003

Assessment of a three-dimensional (3D) water scanning system for beam commissioning and measurements on a helical tomotherapy unit

ABSTRACTS FOR RADIOTHERAPY STANDARDS USERS MEETING. 5 th June 2007

tsmall FIELD DOSE CALIBRATIONS WITH GAFCHROMIC FILM

AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Clinical Reference Dosimetry of High-Energy Photon and Electron Beams

A Dosimetric study of different MLC expansion aperture For the radiotherapy of pancreas cancer

Intensity Modulated RadioTherapy

LONG TERM STABILITY OF THE PERFORMANCE OF A CLINICAL LINEAR ACCELERATOR AND Z-SCORE ASSESSEMENT FOR ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER QUANTITY

Disclosures. Clinical Implementation of SRS/SBRT. Overview. Anil Sethi, PhD. Speaker: BrainLAB Standard Imaging Research collaboration: RaySearch

S. Derreumaux (IRSN) Accidents in radiation therapy in France: causes, consequences and lessons learned

Comparison of microlion liquid filled ionisation chamber with Semiflex and Pinpoint air filled chambers

Limits of Precision and Accuracy of Radiation Delivery Systems

Computed tomography Acceptance testing and dose measurements

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Uncertainties of in vivo Dosimetry Using Semiconductors. I. Introduction. 2. Methodology

Non-target dose from radiotherapy: Magnitude, Evaluation, and Impact. Stephen F. Kry, Ph.D., D.ABR.

Calibration of Radiation Instruments Used in Radiation Protection and Radiotherapy in Malaysia

Detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Patient Specific QA

Can we hit the target? Can we put the dose where we want it? Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Future upcoming technologies and what audit needs to address

Ionization chamber dosimetry of small photon fields: a Monte Carlo study on stopping-power

Implementing New Technologies for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PGY-1. Resident Review Session Schedule

Measurement of Dose to Implanted Cardiac Devices in Radiotherapy Patients

PHYS 383: Applications of physics in medicine (offered at the University of Waterloo from Jan 2015)

IAEA/WHO NETWORK OF SECONDARY STANDARD DOSIMETRY LABORATORIES

Active Scanning Beam 3 Checking Delivery/Dosimetry

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS IN PERCENTAGE DEPTH DOSE (PDD) DETERMINATION AT THE EXTENDED DISTANCES *

Quality Assurance of Helical Tomotherapy Machines

Dosimetric characterization of surface applicators for use with the Xoft ebx system

Learning Objectives. Clinically operating proton therapy facilities. Overview of Quality Assurance in Proton Therapy. Omar Zeidan

IMRT QUESTIONNAIRE. Address: Physicist: Research Associate: Dosimetrist: Responsible Radiation Oncologist(s)

Two-Dimensional Thermoluminescence Dosimetry System for Proton Beam Quality Assurance

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Aspects & Commissioning Strategies

Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry

Level of Accuracy Practically Achievable in Radiation Therapy. David Followill and RPC staff August 6, 2013

Verification of treatment planning system parameters in tomotherapy using EBT Radiochromic Film

Protection of the contralateral breast during radiation therapy for breast cancer

Progress Report on Radiation Dosimetry at NPL

Dosimetric characterization with 62 MeV protons of a silicon segmented detector for 2D dose verifications in radiotherapy

Dosimetric characterization with 62 MeV protons of a silicon segmented detector for 2D dose verifications in radiotherapy

Evaluation of dosimetric characteristics of diodes and ionization chambers in small megavoltage photon field dosimetry

Neutron dose evaluation in radiotherapy

IMRT point dose measurements with a diamond detector

PROCEDURE FOR ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER DETERMINATION IN HIGH ENERGY PHOTON AND ELECTRON BEAMS BY FERROUS SULPHATE DOSIMETER AT INMRI-ENEA

Diode calibration for dose determination in total body irradiation

Transcription:

IAEA/AAPM code of practice for the dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy Hugo Palmans MedAustron, Wiener Neustadt, Austria and National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK 1

Acknowledgements On behalf of the authors: Hugo Palmans (Chair), Pedro Andreo, Karen Christaki-Rosser, Saiful Huq and Jan Seuntjens With thanks to Rodolfo Alfonso, Roberto Capote, Joanna Izewska, Jonas Johansson, Warren Kilby, Per Kjäll, Rock Mackie, Ahmed Meghzifene, Wolfgang Ullrich, Stan Vatnitsky, Mania Aspradakis, Gregor Bruggmoser, Hugo Bouchard, Sylvie Derreumaux, George Ding, Diego Gonzalez-Castaño, Paolo Francescon, David Followill, Faustino Gomez, Malcolm McEwen, Chester Reft, Francisco Sanchez-Doblado, Otto Sauer, Timothy Zhu All the hard working people who have published relevant data 2

Overview 1. Introduction 2. Physics of small field dosimetry 3. Concepts and Formalism 4. Detectors and Equipment 5. Code of practice for reference dosimetry of machine-specific reference fields 6. Code of practice for relative dosimetry of small fields Appendix I. Beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry and their uncertainty estimates Appendix II. Field output correction factors and their uncertainty estimates 3

History First meeting 2006 Alfonso et al 2008 - Formalism for: machine-specific reference dosimetry plan-class specific reference dosimetry small field output factors Reviewer comments 2015 Publication of CoP in 2016 4

#papers used - SF data MLC based units 7 6 #papers used 5 4 3 2 1 0 5

1. Introduction Need - scope Brief overview Quantities and symbols - abbreviations 6

2. Physics of small field dosimetry Small field conditions - Loss of lateral charged particle equilibrium - Partial occlusion of the primary source - Detector size too large Definition of field size (FWHM) Spectral hardening Beam quality Detector response Energy range of interest Absorbed dose standards Current practice 7

3. Concepts and formalism Concepts: definition of field size: FWHM machine-specific reference field lateral charged particle equilibrium range (r LCPE ) volume averaging beam quality Formalism: msr reference dosimetry measurements in plastic phantoms determination of field output factors 8

3. Formalism - lateral charged particle equilibrium range rr LCPE rr LCPE cccc = 8.360 TPR 20,10 (10) 4.382 cccc = 0.07797 %dddd 10,10 X 4.112 The machine-specific reference field should extend at least a distance rr LCPE beyond the outer boundaries of the reference ionization chamber 9

3. Formalism (Alfonso et al) / D w in machine specific reference (msr) fields Chamber calibrated specifically for the msr field ff DD msr ww,qqmsr ff = msr ff MMQQmsr NN msr DD,ww,QQmsr Chamber calibrated for the conventional reference field and generic correction factors are available ff DD msr ww,qqmsr ff = msr ff MMQQmsr NN ref ff DD,ww,QQ0 msr,ff ref kkqqmsr,qq 0 Chamber calibrated for the conventional reference field and generic correction factors not available ff DD msr ww,qqmsr ff = msr ff MMQQmsr NN ref DD,ww,QQ0 ff ref ff kkqq,qq0 kk msr,ff ref QQmsr,QQ 10

3. Formalism for FFF beam Identical formalism: ff DD msr ww,qqmsr ff = msr ff MMQQmsr NN ref DD,ww,QQ0 ff ref ff kkqq,qq0 kk msr,ff ref QQmsr,QQ 11

3. Formalism for FFF beam Identical formalism: ff DD msr ww,qqmsr ff = msr ff MMQQmsr NN ref DD,ww,QQ0 ff ref ff kkqq,qq0 kk msr,ff ref QQmsr,QQ But to clarify the calculation: ff DD msr ww,qqmmmmmm FFFFFF ff = msr ff MMQQmmmmmm FFFFFF NN ref DD,ww,QQ0 WWFFFF ff ref kkqq WWWWWW,QQ WWWWWW 0 ff ref kkqq FFFFFF,QQ WWWWWW ff msr,ff ref kkqqmmmmmm FFFFFF,QQ FFFFFF with BQI QQ FFFFFF = BQI QQ WWFFFF 12

3. Formalism for FFF beam Identical formalism: ff DD msr ww,qqmsr ff = msr ff MMQQmsr NN ref DD,ww,QQ0 ff ref ff kkqq,qq0 kk msr,ff ref QQmsr,QQ But to clarify the calculation: ff DD msr ww,qqmmmmmm FFFFFF ff = msr ff MMQQmmmmmm FFFFFF NN ref DD,ww,QQ0 WWFFFF ff ref kkqq WWWWWW,QQ WWWWWW 0 ff ref kkqq FFFFFF,QQ WWWWWW ff msr,ff ref kkqqmmmmmm FFFFFF,QQ FFFFFF with BQI QQ FFFFFF = BQI QQ WWFFFF ff ss ww,aaaaaa and kk rrrrrr vvvvvv QQ FFFFFF 13

3. Volume averaging kk vvvvvv = AA AA ww xx, yy dddddddd ww xx, yy OAr(xx, yy)dddddddd Compare with Kawachi et al 2008 kk vvvvvv = AA AA dddddddd OAr(xx, yy)dddddddd 14

3. Use of plastic phantoms ff DD mmmmmm ff ww,qqmmmmmm zzrrrrrr = MM mmmmmm ff rrrrrr ff mmmmmm,ff rrrrrr ww,pppppppppppppp pppppppppppppp,qqmmmmmm zzeeee,pppppppppppppp NN DD,ww,QQ0 kk QQmmmmmm,QQ kk 0 QQmmmmmm Exception for GammaKnife: kk ww,pppppppppppppp ff mmmmmm,ff rrrrrr QQmmmmmm integrated in kk QQmmmmmm,QQ 0 15

3. Formalism / determination of field output factors Field output factor relative to the reference field ff ΩΩ clin,ff msr QQclin,QQ msr = MM ff clin QQ clin ff kk clin,ff msr ff MM mmmmmm QQclin,QQ msr QQmmmmmm Field output factor relative to the reference field using the intermediate field method ff clin,ff msr = MM ff clin QQ clin ff kk clin,ff int ff int QQclin,QQ int ΩΩ QQclin,QQ msr MM QQint det ff MM int QQint ff int,ff msr kk ff MM mmmmmm QQint,QQ msr QQmmmmmm IC 16

4. Instrumentation TABLE 3. SPECIFICATIONS FOR REFERENCE-CLASS IONIZATION CHAMBERS FOR REFERENCE DOSIMETRY OF msr FIELDS. Parameter Chamber settling Leakage Polarity effect Recombination correction Specification Monitoring chamber response with accumulated dose, equilibrium should be reached in less than 5 minutes; the initial and equilibrium reading should agree within 0.5 %. Smaller than 0.1 % of the chamber reading Smaller than 0.4% of the chamber reading. The polarity energy dependence should be less than 0.3% between 60 Co and 10 MV photons. 1. The correction must be linear with dose per pulse 2. Initial recombination (the dose rate or dose-per-pulse independent part of the total charge recombination) must be below 0.2% at polarizing voltages around 300 V. 3. For pulsed beams, a plot of 1/M Q (charge reading) vs 1/V (polarizing voltage) should be linear at least for practical values of V. 4. For continuous beams, a plot of 1/M Q vs 1/V 2 should be linear, describing the effect of general recombination. The presence of initial recombination disturbs the linearity but this is normally a small effect, which may be neglected. 5. The difference in the initial recombination correction obtained with opposite polarities should be less than 0.1%. Chamber stability Change in calibration coefficient over a typical recalibration period of 217 years below 0.3 %. Same figure for long term (>5 y) stability Chamber material Wall material not exhibiting temperature and humidity effects

4. Instrumentation TABLE 4. CHARACTERISTICS OF CYLINDRICAL IONIZATION CHAMBERS [1] FOR REFERENCE DOSIMETRY OF msr FIELDS f msr 6 cm 6 cm. Ionization chamber type Cavity volume (cm 3 ) Cavity length (mm) Cavity radius (mm) Wall material Wall thickne ss (g cm - 2 ) Central electrode material b Waterpro of Capintec PR-06C/G Farmer 0.65 22.0 3.2 C-552 0.050 C-552 N Exradin A2 Spokas 0.53 11.4 4.8 C-552 0.176 C-552 Y Exradin A12 Farmer 0.65 24.2 3.1 C-552 0.088 C-552 Y 18

4. Instrumentation TABLE 7. SILICON DIODE, DIAMOND. LIQUID IONIZATION CHAMBER AND ORGANIC SCINTILLATOR DETECTORS FOR SMALL FIELD DOSIMETRY. Detector Sensitiv e volume (mm 3 ) Geometric form of sensitive area a Diameter or side length of sensitive area (mm) Thickness of sensitive volume (mm) Reference point (from flat face/tip) (mm) Shielde d IBA-PFD3G diode 0.19 disc 2 0.06 < 0.9 Yes IBA-EFD3G diode 0.19 disc 2 0.06 < 0.9 No IBA-SFD diode 0.017 disc 0.6 0.06 < 0.9 No PTW 31018 liquid ion 1.7 disc 2.5 0.35 1.0 Yes chamber PTW-60008 diode b 0.03 disc 1.13 0.03 2.0 Yes PTW-60012 diode b 0.03 disc 1.13 0.03 0.8 No PTW-60016 diode 0.03 disc 1.13 0.03 2.4 Yes PTW-60017 diode 0.03 disc 1.13 0.03 1.3 No PTW-60018 diode 0.3 disc 1.13 0.25 1.3 No PTW-60003 natural 1-6 variable <4 0.1-0.4 1.0 No diamond PTW-60019 CVD diamond 0.004 disc 2.2 0.001 1.0 No b Sun Nuclear Edge 0.0019 square 0.8 0.03 0.3 Yes Detector Exradin W1 (Standard Imaging) 2.4 cylinder 1.0 3.0 1.5 No 19

5. Reference conditions Table 9: REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER IN HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON BEAMS ON CYBERKNIFE MACHINES. Influence quantity Phantom material Phantom shape and size Chamber type Measurement depth z ref Reference value or reference characteristics Water At least 30 cm x 30 cm x 30 cm Cylindrical z max Reference point of chamber on the central axis at the centre of the cavity volume Position of reference point at the measurement depth z ref of chamber SDD 80 cm Field shape and size Circular, maximum available, fixed collimator (6 cm diameter) 20

5. Overall correction factors for ionization chambers Table 12: DATA FOR THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD (10 cm 10 cm) FOR REFERENCE IONIZATION CHAMBERS IN LINACS WITH FLATTENING FILTER (WFF), AS A FUNCTION OF THE BEAM QUALITY INDICES TPR AND. Ion chamber TPR 20,10 (10) = 0.630 0.660 0.690 0.720 0.750 dd(10,10) X = 63.4 65.2 67.6 70.5 73.9 Capintec PR-06C/G Farmer 0.997 0.994 0.991 0.988 0.982 Exradin A2 Spokas 0.998 0.997 0.995 0.992 0.988 Exradin A12 Farmer 0.998 0.996 0.993 0.990 0.984 21

5.Equations for beam quality in nonstandard reference fields for TPR 20,10 10 = TPR 20,10 TPR 20,10 10 for %dddd 10,10 = TPR 20,10 SS +cc(10 SS) 1+cc(10 SS) = %dddd 10,10 X = %dddd 10 X %dddd 10,SS +80cc(10 SS) %dddd 10,10 = 1+cc(10 SS) TPR 20,10(s) PDD 10(s) 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 25 MV 21 MV 18 MV 15 MV 12 MV 10 MV 8 MV 6 MV 5 MV 0.60 4 MV (b) 0.55 2 4 6 8 10 12 s / cm 85 25 MV 80 21 MV 18 MV 75 15 MV 12 MV 70 10 MV 8 MV 65 6 MV 60 5 MV 4 MV 22 (d) 55 2 4 6 8 10 12 s / cm

5. Equivalent square msr field size 23

5. Other Equipment: ionization chambers and phantoms Correction for influence quantities: see IAEA TRS-398 Plastic phantoms 24

Ch 6 Practical implementation relative dosimetry Required equipment, detectors, phantoms Measurements of profiles and field output factors Correction factors for determination of output factors 25

Ch 6. Equivalent square small field size Cranmer-Sargison et al 2011 RO 109:350 Rectangular field: SS clin = AA BB Circular field: SS clin = rr ππ = 1.77rr 26

6. Alignment Table 22: DETECTOR ORIENTATION, WITH RESPECT TO THE BEAM CENTRAL AXIS, FOR RELATIVE DOSIMETRY IN SMALL PHOTON FIELDS. Detector type Detector s geometrical reference Lateral beam profiles Field output factors Cylindrical micro ion chamber axis parallel or perpendicular perpendicular Liquid ion chamber axis perpendicular parallel Silicon shielded diode axis parallel parallel Silicon unshielded diode axis parallel parallel Diamond detector axis parallel parallel Radiochromic Film film surface perpendicular perpendicular Scan orientations for beam profiles Three methods for alignment with field 27

6. Alignment 28

Appendix I s w,air for FFF beams 29

Appendix I volume averaging FFF beams ff kk rrrrrr vvvvvv QQ FFFFFF = AA AA ww xx, yy dddddddd ww xx, yy OAr(xx, yy)dddddddd 30

Appendix I volume averaging FFF beams ff kk rrrrrr vvvvvv QQ = 1 + 0.000059 %dd 10,10 XX 0.00338 100 SSSSSS 2 LL 2 31

ff Appendix I kk msr,ff ref QQmsr,QQ 0 for FFF beams Table 12: DATA FOR THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD (10 cm 10 cm) FOR REFERENCE IONIZATION CHAMBERS IN LINACS WITH FLATTENING FILTER (WFF), AS A FUNCTION OF THE BEAM QUALITY INDICES TPR (10) AND %dd(10,10) X. Ion chamber TPR 20,10 (10) = 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.75 dd(10,10) X = 63.4 65.2 67.6 70.5 73.9 Capintec PR-06C/G Farmer 0.997 0.994 0.991 0.988 0.982 Exradin A2 Spokas 0.998 0.997 0.995 0.992 0.988 Exradin A12 Farmer Ion chamber TPR 20,10 (10) = dd(10,10) X = 0.998 0.996 0.993 0.990 0.984 Table 13: DATA FOR THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD (10 cm 10 cm) FOR REFERENCE IONIZATION CHAMBERS IN FLATTENING FILTER FREE (FFF) LINACS, AS A FUNCTION OF THE BEAM QUALITY INDICES TPR (10) AND %dd(10,10) X, AND FOR THE CYBERKNIFE AND TOMOTHERAPY MACHINES. (NOTE THAT THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN TPR (10) AND %dd(10,10) X IS DIFFERENT FROM THAT OR WFF BEAMS.). 0.63 63.8 0.66 65.6 0.69 68.2 0.72 71.7 0.75 76.1 Capintec PR-06C/G Farmer 0.996 0.995 0.992 0.988 0.981 Exradin A2 Spokas 0.996 0.996 0.993 0.989 0.983 32 Exradin A12 Farmer 0.998 0.997 0.994 0.991 0.984

Validation CyberKnife Ionization chamber ff kk msr,ff ref QQmsr Reference Francescon Araki Kawachi (2012) (2006) (2008) Exradin A12 0.996 1.006 (1.007) Exradin A12S 0.995 (0.998) NE 2571 1.003 NE 2561/2611 0.994 (0.996) PTW 30001 0.989 (0.999) PTW 30002 0.992 (1.002) PTW 30004 0.993 (1.003) PTW 30006/30013 0.989 1.000 (0.999) Francescon (2005) 0.995 (1.006) 0.991 (1.001) This CoP 0.993 1.004 0.991 0.993 0.992 1.003 0.991 0.993 0.989 0.999 0.991 0.999 0.993 1.003 0.989 0.999 33

Validation TomoTherapy Ionization chamber Reference Exradin A12 Sterpin (2012) 1.000 ff kk msr,ff ref QQmsr Jeraj (2005) This CoP 0.996 0.998 NE 2571 0.997 0.995 (0.997) 0.994 0.996 PTW 30006/30013 0.997 0.995 (0.997) 0.993 0.995 34

Appendix II Output correction ff factors, kk clin,ff reeee QQclin,QQ reeee, for small fields Reference detectors, perturbation-free except for volume averaging k f clin, f msr Q clin, Q msr [ sfd] = M Q clin [ ref ] kvol[ ref ]/ M Q [ ref ] msr [ sfd] / M [ sfd] M Q msr Reference detector with known output correction factors k f clin, f msr Q clin, Q msr [ sfd] = M Q clin Q clin f [ ref ] clin, f msr kq [ ref ]/ [ ref ] clin, Q M msr Q msr M [ sfd] / M [ sfd] Q clin Q msr Monte Carlo calculated output correction factors k f clin, f msr Q clin, Q msr [ sfd] = D D det, Q clin w, Q clin / D w, Q msr [ sfd] / D [ sfd] det, Q msr 35

ff Appendix II Uncertainty of kk clin,ff reeee QQclin,QQ reeee Two components: 1. Based on literature, generic 1% to all individual data points, except 2% for experimental data for S < 1 cm and weighted averages of interpolated data 2. Spread of data as 95% confidence limits 36

ff Appendix II - kk clin,ff reeee QQclin,QQ reeee diodes 37

ff Appendix II - kk clin,ff reeee QQclin,QQ reeee diodes 38

ff Appendix II - kk clin,ff reeee QQclin,QQ reeee mini and micro IC 39

ff Appendix II - kk clin,ff reeee QQclin,QQ reeee energy dependence 40

ff Appendix II - kk clin,ff reeee QQclin,QQ reeee depth dependence 41

Appendix II - Uncertainties Square small field size S / cm unshielded diodes & PTW-60019 microdiamon d shielded diodes mini IC micro IC PTW- 60003 natural diamond PTW- 31018 liquid ion chamber 0.4 0.9 2.9 2.2 0.5 0.8 3.2 2.2 1.7 0.6 0.7 1.3 2.5 1.7 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.9 3.4 1.6 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.7 2.5 1.1 0.7 0.9 1.2 0.5 0.6 1.8 0.8 0.6 0.9 1.5 0.5 0.6 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.8 2.0 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.8 2.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.7 3.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 3.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 4.0 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 5.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 6.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 8.0 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 42

That s all Thank you 43