Temporary Bite Opening with Güray Bite Raiser

Similar documents
Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

A Method for Stabilizing a Lingual Fixed Retainer in Place Prior to Bonding

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Significant improvement with limited orthodontics anterior crossbite in an adult patient

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

Correction of a maxillary canine-first premolar transposition using mini-implant anchorage

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

The management of impacted

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

Lower Anterior Crowding Correction by a Convenient Lingual Methodjerd_

Treatment of an open bite case with 3M Clarity ADVANCED Ceramic Brackets and miniscrews.

INDICATIONS. Fixed Appliances are indicated when precise tooth movements are required

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

Fixed Twin Blocks. Guidelines for case selection are similar to those for removable Twin Block appliances.

The main challenge in using the natural dentition

INCLUDES: OVERVIEW ON CLINICAL SITUATIONS FREQUENTLY ENCOUNTERED IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTS MECHANOTHERAPY USED TO RESOLVE THESE SITUATIONS

rocky mountain orthodontics functionaleducation

Ectopic upper canine associated to ectopic lower second bicuspid. Case report

ORTHODONTIC INTERVENTION IN MIXED DENTITION: A BOON FOR PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

The Reinforced Removable Retainer

Plus Combines Traditional Twin Bracket Treatment With Self-Ligation Convenience

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

REPRINTED FROM JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHODONTICS 1828 PEARL STREET, BOULDER, COLORADO Dr. Nanda Dr. Marzban Dr. Kuhlberg

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

Segmental Orthodontics for the Correction of Cross Bites

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

Use of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports

We Give Back. Reduce Emergency Visits! ATTACHMENTS. No More Poking Archwires! Crimpable Mini Stops. Tooth Tone Crimpable Mini Stops

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

SELF LIGATING BRACKETS. 1. Commercial name: EasyClip EasyClip+ Lotus Self-ligating single buccal tubes

Honing Damon System Mechanics for the Ultimate in Efficiency and Excellence Jeff Kozlowski, DDS East Lyme, CT

6. Timing for orthodontic force

Integrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D.

With judicious treatment planning, the clinical

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

A SIMPLE METHOD FOR CORRECTION OF BUCCAL CROSSBITE OF MAXILLARY SECOND MOLAR

LEARN FROM A LEADER. Intensive, hands-on training that will prepare you to confidently fabricate the appliances you want.

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

THE USE OF VACCUM FORM RETAINERS FOR RELAPSE CORRECTION

Treatment of a malocclusion characterized

System Orthodontic Treatment Program By Dr. Richard McLaughlin, Dr. John Bennett and Dr. Hugo Trevisi

Canine Extrusion Technique with SmartClip Self-Ligating Brackets

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

TransForce 2. Arch Developer Appliances Clinical Cases. New Horizons In Orthodontics

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

THE MBT VERSATILE+ APPLIANCE SYSTEM

RETENTION AND RELAPSE

Orthodontic treatment of midline diastema related to abnormal frenum attachment - A case series.

ORTHOdontics ORTHODONTIC LABORATORY

Comprehensive Orthodontic Diagnosis Align upper and lower arches is not a treatment plan!

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Enhanced Control in the Transverse Dimension using the Unitek MIA Quad Helix System by Dr. Sven G. Wiezorek

Aesthetic Brackets and Accessories

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

How to place a lower bonded retainer

Holy Nexus of Variable Wire Cross-section: New Vistas in Begg s Technique

Extractions of first permanent molars in orthodontics: Treatment planning, technical considerations and two clinical case reports

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

PRE-FINISHER APPLIANCE AND BONDABLE LINGUAL RETAINERS. tportho.com cosmeticbraces.com. POD_TPOC_09_PreFinisher_Retainers_2015, Rev.

ortho case report Sagittal First international magazine of orthodontics By Dr. Luis Carrière Special Reprint

THE USE OF TEMPORARY ANCHORAGE DEVICES FOR MOLAR INTRUSION & TREATMENT OF ANTERIOR OPEN BITE By Eduardo Nicolaievsky D.D.S.

Mixed Dentition Treatment and Habits Therapy

The Dynamax System: A New Orthopedic Appliance

ORTHODONTIC CORRECTION Of OCCLUSAL CANT USING MINI IMPLANTS:A CASE REPORT. Gupta J*, Makhija P.G.**, Jain V***

Various composite resins are used in orthodontic

CONVENTIONAL METAL BRACKETS AND AUXILIARY. 1. Commercial name: BioMax One Piece Vector Bionic Vector+ Tubos Ball Hook Stop Cleat Eyelet

Dual Force Cuspid Retractor

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

AAO 115th Annual Session San Francisco, CA May 17 (Sunday), 1:15-2:00 pm, 2015

Invisalign technique in the treatment of adults with pre-restorative concerns

Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; June 2014: Vol.-3, Issue- 3, P

Research methodology University of Turku, Finland

Management of three impacted teeth detected early

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

The 20/20 Molar Tube. Ronald M. Roncone, D.D.S., M.S.

Dzakovich Conclusions

eral Maxillary y Molar Distalization with Sliding Mechanics: Keles Slider

Australian Dental Journal

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

CLASS II CORRECTION SIMPLIFIED

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

SnapLink Re-Convertible Tube

The Science Behind The System Clinical Abstracts, Volume 2

Orthodontic treatment for jaw defor. Sakamoto, T; Sakamoto, S; Harazaki, Author(s) Yamaguchi, H. Journal Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College, 4

Clinical Consideration Series. Dedicated to help you treat with confidence. Crowding.

New Class of Appliance

Space Closure Biomechanics Applied Using The MBT System Technique

Frequency of the Various Classes of Removable Partial Dentures and Selection of Major Connectors and Direct/Indirect Retainers

Efficient Bonding Protocol for the Insignia Custom Bracket System

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Transcription:

Fall 12 Temporary Bite Opening with Güray Bite Raiser Dr. Enis Güray* Int. Dt. Yaman Güray** Ortho Technology, Inc. White Paper Report 17401 Commerce Park Blvd, Tampa, FL 33647 USA

Dr. Enis Güray is a published author, inventor, professor, orthodontist, and member of the Turkish Orthodontic Society, Société Française d Orthopedie Dento-faciale, European Orthodontic Society, and the World Federation of Orthodontists. Born in Istanbul, Turkey in 1958, Dr. Güray attended Saint Joseph French College from 1970-1977, then the University of Hacetepe, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara (5 year curriculum) from 1977 1982. He was a DDS, Instructor from 1982-1986 at the Department of Orthodontics, University of Hacettepe (4 year program) then went on to obtain his PhD in 1986 for University of Hacettepe Thesis: The Effects of Nasal Obstruction to Dento-facial Structures. Dr. Güray has held a private practice while at the same time being a clinical instructor and lecturer at the University of Selçuk, Department of Orthodontics, Konya and later the University of Çukurova, Department of Orthodontics, Adana. He is the inventor of the Güray Instant Bite Raiser, EZ Space Maintainer, and EZ Slider. Dr. Enis Güray enisg@orthotechnology.com What is the Need for a Bite Opener? Orthodontists often need to open the bite in the beginning stages of treatment to avoid traumatic occlusion caused by bracket interferences, cross bites, or other impediments to tooth movement. What s Wrong With Current Devices? Many devices have been utilized for this purpose, including anterior or posterior bite splints, bonded lingual bite planes or Bite Turbos, Bite-Builder, and bonded occlusal composite resin build-ups (1,2, 3). All of these devices have some limitations. Bite splints require impressions, laboratory procedures, and additional appointments for insertion and monitoring. Removable plates also require full patient cooperation (4). Bonded lingual biteplanes are not adjustable and can be difficult to remove. Composite resin build-ups require additional chair time and may cause undesired occlusal enamel wear if filled resins are used (5). In addition, the composite may become worn down and ineffective due to bruxism, requiring additional chair time to restore it to the appropriate height (1). Fine proposed bonding lingual brackets to the maxillary central incisors, but recommended limiting this technique to Class I or Class II, division 2 cases with minimal overjet (6). Furthermore, the lingual brackets can be as fragile as the mandibular facial brackets they are designed to protect. Introduction of the Güray Bite Raiser In 1999, Güray introduced a new type of bite-opening appliance, the temporary bite raiser (7). This was made of.040" stainless steel wire that was adapted to the occlusal surface of the maxillary first molar. At the time of its introduction, the principal drawback of the appliance was the time necessary to fabricate it at chair side. However, a prefabricated version of Güray s device*** has been introduced. It has been found very effective under most conditions when molar bands with headgear tubes are used (1, 8, 9, 10, 11). Copyright Ortho Technology, Inc. 2012

The Güray Bite Raiser is designed to be inserted into the headgear tube and then hinged into place over the occlusal surface of the maxillary first molar. It is tied with a stainless steel ligature to the headgear tube from its vestibular wings. Güray Bite Raisers are manufactured in two sizes, 0.8mm thickness for children and 1.0mm thickness for adults, which can accommodate most bite-opening requirements (Pictures 1-6). It has been found that bilateral placement balances the posterior occlusion more effectively and comfortably for the patient. Advantages of the Güray Bite Raiser Found Through Case Studies Doruk and his co-workers reported its usage on Class II, Division 2 cases and concluded that the Güray Bite Raiser treatment procedure has proven to be simple, with less chair time and no need for laboratory work. It does not depend on patient cooperation, nor does it interfere with oral hygiene. Thanks to its short-term usage, the bite raisers appear to have no adverse effects on maxillary molar positions. The Güray Bite Raiser simplifies the orthodontic correction of the Class II, Division 2, deep-bite cases with the simultaneous bonding of the lower arch (8). Gökalp and Uslu reported its usage on Class III cases and concluded that the temporary usage of the Güray Bite Raiser allowed simultaneous fixed appliance treatment and overbite reduction. Patient was treated to an ideal result, with full occlusion and a harmonious facial profile with the help of the Güray Bite Raiser (9). Ceen s study reported several advantages of the Güray Bite Raiser over existing techniques (1): It can be placed or removed easily and quickly without patient discomfort or the need for special instruments. The patient s bite relationship can be assessed as often as necessary by removing the ligature and hinging the device to check the occlusion. No laboratory procedures are required. Patient acceptance has been comparable to that of other bite-opening appliances. The stainless steel appliance is adjustable and designed for use with either occlusally or gingivally placed headgear tubes. The major disadvantage of the Güray Bite Raiser is that it may not allow headgear or auxiliary wires to be placed simultaneously (1). However, again thanks to its short-term usage, the clinician can perform the headgear therapy after eliminating the bite problem. In addition to its advantages, the Bite Raisers could be used successfully in lingual technique for temporary bite opening (10). W. Alexander s review about the bite opening appliances reports that the Güray Bite Raiser works very well in opening the occlusion in patients with Class II deep-bite. He also found it very effective for the correction of anterior cross-bites (11). 4 Ortho Technology, Inc. 2012

Application of the Güray Bite Raiser Picture 1: Insert the proximal wings of the Bite Raiser into the headgear tube and tie the proximal wings to the headgear tube with a stainless steel ligature followed with an elastomeric separator. Picture 2: Overlay the Bite Raiser onto the molar occlusal surface and tie the T spur to the palatal button or lingual cleat with an elastomeric separator. 3a 3b 3c 3d Pictures 3 (a-d): Lateral frontal and the occlusal initial views of the patient with left upper lateral cross-bite. Copyright Ortho Technology, Inc. 2012

4a 4b 4c 4d Pictures 4 (a-d): Bite is temporarily raised to provide an unobstructed movement for the lateral incisor. 6 Ortho Technology, Inc. 2012

5a 5b 5c 5d Pictures 5 (a-d): Cross-bite is corrected. Conclusion Because of its short-term usage, Güray Bite Raiser appears to have no adverse effects on maxillary molar positions. Long-term wear might produce some molar intrusion, which could be reversed with appropriate wire bending during the course of treatment (7). REFERENCES: 1. R. F. Ceen.: Bite Opening with the Güray Bite Raiser. J. Clin.Orthod. 2002, 36, p.639640. 2. Vanarsdall, R.L. and Musich, D.R.: Adult orthodontics: Diagnosis and treatment, in Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques, ed. T.M. Graber and R.L. Vanarsdall Jr., C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 2000, p. 870. 3. Brobakken, B.O. and Zachrisson, B.U.: Abrasive wear of bonding adhesives: Studies during treatment and after bracket removal, Am. J. Orthod. 79:134, 1981. 4. Jackson, S. and Sandler, P.J.: Fixed biteplates for treatment of deep bite, J. Clin. Orthod. 30:283-287, 1996. 5. Thompson, R.E. and Way, D.C.: Enamel loss due to prophylax is and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments, Am. J. Orthod. 79:282, 1982. 6. Fine, H.A.: A fixed labial/lingual technique for rapid bite opening, J. Clin. Orthod. 25:606607, 1991. 7. Güray, E.: Temporary Bite Raiser, J. Clin. Orthod. 33: 206-208, 1999. 8. C. Doruk, A. Bıçakçı, H. Babacan. www.oc.j.com, 2001. Copyright Ortho Technology, Inc. 2012

9. H. Gökalp, Ö. Uslu.: Treatment of Cl III Anterior Cross Bite Using Güray Bite Raisers. J. Clin. Orthod., 62: 5, p297-300, 2008. 10. M. C. Canikoğlu, Y. Öztürk.: Güray Bite Raiser: its clinical use in lingual orthodontic treatment. J. Lingual Orthod., 2002. 11. R. G. Wick Alexander.: The 20 Principles of the Alexander Discipline. Quintessence Books, p.88-89, 2007. *Dr.Güray (Assoc.Prof.) is a lecturer and clinical instructor in the Department of Orthodontics, Erciyes University, Kayseri and in the private practice of orthodontics at Cinnah Cad. No:37/3 Cankaya Ankara, Turkey. **Int. Dt. Yaman Güray is a dental student at the Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. ***Ortho Technology, Inc., Tampa, Florida, USA. US Patent No. 6,726,473 B1 and EP 1 217 965 B1 2012 Ortho Technology, Inc. Güray Bite Raiser is a trademark of Ortho Technology. 8 Ortho Technology, Inc. 2012