The Treatment Toolbox for Severe Pediatric Psoriasis

Similar documents
Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report Final R&D/14/1263. Page:

Update on systemic therapies and emerging treatments How do I choose a systemic agent?

Rheumatology journal club October 20, 2017 Presented by: Matthew Stoll MD,PhD,PSCS

Synopsis (C0743T09 PHOENIX 2)

Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report Final R&D/16/0603

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Criteria Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria. despite treatment with csdmards, NSAIDs, and/or previous anti-tnf therapy and/or

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab R&D/04/118. (For National Authority Use Only) Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume:

Incorporating Biologics Into Your Practice

Bilaga 1.till rapport. Bilaga 1 Tabell över inkluderade studier/ Appendix 1 Description of included studies

Psoriasis: Therapeutic goals

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report R&D/04/900. (For National Authority Use Only) Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume:

SYNOPSIS. Issue Date: 17 Jan 2013

Breakthrough Drugs in Dermatology. Mark Lebwohl, MD

Anti-TNF biologic agents Dr Lluís Puig

Synopsis (C0743T10) CNTO 1275 Module 5.3 C0743T10. Associated with Module 5.3 of the Dossier

Biologics in Psoriasis: 2018 and Beyond. Jeffrey M. Sobell MD Tufts University School of Medicine SkinCare Physicians Ora Clinical Research

London, 1 June 2006 Product name: REMICADE Procedure number: Remicade-H-240-II-73-AR SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION 1/8

ustekinumab (Stelara )

Off-Label Biologic Regimens in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety of Dose Escalation, Reduction, and Interrupted Biologic Therapy

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report Final R&D/15/1093. (For National Authority Use Only)

Ixekizumab. Η νέα θεραπευτική προςέγγιςη ςτη ΨΑ μέςω τησ αναςτολήσ τησ IL-17A. Απρίλιοσ 2018 ΕΠΕΜΥ Πόρτο Χέλι

Clinical Policy: Apremilast (Otezla) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.245 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: HIM, Medicaid

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

Pediatric Use: Safety and effectiveness of Ustekinumab (STELARA ) in pediatric patients have not been evaluated.

Biologics in Psoriasis. Peter CM van de Kerkhof Department of Dermatology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

Cigna Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy

Ustekinumab Safety in Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Crohn s Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Phase II/III Clinical Development Programs

Clinical Policy: Ixekizumab (Taltz) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.122 Effective Date:

Ontario Public Drug Programs. Inflectra (infliximab) Frequently Asked Questions

CADTH CANADIAN DRUG EXPERT COMMITTEE FINAL RECOMMENDATION

2017 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana

STELARA DATA SHEET NAME OF THE MEDICINE DESCRIPTION V L C L V H C H 1 C H 2 C H 3. Fab. F(ab)' 2. hinge

ETANERCEPT Generic Brand HICL GCN Exception/Other ETANERCEPT ENBREL GUIDELINES FOR USE INITIAL CRITERIA (NOTE: FOR RENEWAL CRITERIA SEE BELOW)

Elements of Successful PBS Applications. Barbara Radulski RN. Copyright

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page:

Clinical Policy: Secukinumab (Cosentyx) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.261 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: HIM, Medicaid

Clinical Policy: Ixekizumab (Taltz) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.257 Effective Date: Last Review Date: 05.18

XP23829 PHASE 2 PSORIASIS TRIAL PRELIMINARY TOPLINE DATA PRESENTATION SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 COPYRIGHT 2015 XENOPORT, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Stelara. Stelara (ustekinumab) Description

Clinical Policy: Ustekinumab (Stelara) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.264

Clinical Policy: Secukinumab (Cosentyx) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.261 Effective Date: 08/16 Last Review Date: 08/17

Faculty David M. Pariser, MD Professor Eastern Virginia Medical School Norfolk, VA

Clinical Policy: Ixekizumab (Taltz) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.257 Effective Date: Last Review Date: 11.18

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab DE019 OLE (5-year) Clinical Study Report Amendment 1 R&D/06/095. (For National Authority Use Only)

Clinical Policy: Ustekinumab (Stelara) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.264 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: HIM, Medicaid

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 26 April 2006

USTEKINUMAB Generic Brand HICL GCN Exception/Other USTEKINUMAB STELARA GUIDELINES FOR USE

Etanercept: a new option in paediatric plaque psoriasis

1. Background: Infliximab is administered parenterally; therefore, it is not covered under retail pharmacy benefits.

Secukinumab for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Erratum

The New and Emerging Agents: Dermatology

Ustekinumab (Stelara) for psoriatic arthritis second line after disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)

24-Week CNTO1275PSA3001 Clinical Study Report

Clinical Policy: Brodalumab (Siliq) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.375 Effective Date: Last Review Date: 05.18

USTEKINUMAB. London New Drugs Group APC/DTC Briefing Document. May 2009

PRODUCT INFORMATION HUMIRA

STELARA (USTEKINUMAB)

ixekizumab 80mg solution for injection (Taltz ) SMC No. (1223/17) Eli Lilly and Company Ltd.

Public observer slides

Disclosures. Activity Information. Updates in Psoriasis Therapy. Ustekinumab Guselkumab Tildrakizumab. Secukinumab Ixekizumab Brodalumab

Tremfya (guselkumab) NEW PRODUCT SLIDESHOW

Kim A. Papp, MD PhD Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada

Clinical Policy: Ustekinumab (Stelara) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.01 Effective Date:

Risankizumab (by subcutaneous injection) for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis

UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs

STELARA (USTEKINUMAB)

Psoriasiform Dermatitis in Children: Calling in the Troops

The 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, San Francisco ; March 20-24, 2015 Poster ID: 909

Appendix 1: Frequently Asked Questions

USTEKINUMAB and BRIAKINUMAB

Clinical Policy: Apremilast (Otezla) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.245 Effective Date: 08/16 Last Review Date 08/17

STELARA (USTEKINUMAB)

Clinical Policy: Secukinumab (Cosentyx) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.165 Effective Date:

certolizumab pegol (Cimzia )

Insights from the Clalit Health Services database about Psoriasis Research using BIG DATA Arnon D. Cohen, MD, MPH, PHD

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with plaque psoriasis who have shown an unsatisfactory response to etanercept

Psoriasis Pearls. Mark Lebwohl, MD

What s New in the Treatment of Psoriasis

Psoriasis management. A/Prof Amanda Oakley Dermatologist, Waikato

Pharmacy Prior Authorization

Stelara. Stelara (ustekinumab) Description

2nd Nottingham IBD Masterclass, 2017

BJD. Summary. British Journal of Dermatology THERAPEUTICS

STELARA. ustekinumab NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET

What is Cosentyx (secukinumab)?

Psoriasis. Dr. Pablo de la Cueva Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor Madrid

Siliq. Siliq (brodalumab) Description

Table SIII. Evidence table. First author (Ref), year Design Dosage Outcome measures Adalimumab Ryan (12), Date of evaluation

The Natural History of Psoriasis and Treatment Goals

New Evidence reports on presentations given at ACR Improving Radiographic, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes with Rituximab

THE THERAPY OF THE REBEL SEVERE PSORIAZIS WITH BIOLOGICAL PREPARATS

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Cosentyx. Cosentyx (secukinumab) Description

J. Gelfand 1, A. Joshi 2, D. Shin 1, A. Dey 2, D. Torigian 1, D. Rader 1, M. Playford 2, M. Ahlman 2, A. Alavi 1, N. Mehta 2.

U of Cape Town, South Africa, 10 U of Washington, Seattle, WA,USA, 11 CHRU de Lille, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France, 12

INFLIXIMAB Remicade (infliximab), Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), Ixifi* (infliximabqbtx), Renflexis (infliximab-abda)

The Cosentyx clinical trial programme 1-11

Transcription:

The Treatment Toolbox for Severe Pediatric Psoriasis Dr. Kim A. Papp, MD, PhD, FRCPC, FAAD K Papp Clinical Research and Probity Medical Research

Objectives: Treating severe pediatric psoriasis 1. Challenges of current treatment options 2. Conditions that may impact treatment decisions 3. Adalimumab in the treatment of severe pediatric psoriasis 4. Evidence for treatment success

Commentary safety severity

The good old days

Diabetes Cyclosporine Arterial Hypertension Hyperlipidemia Methotrexate

BIOLOGIC TREATMENT OPTIONS Treating by the Evidence

Etanercept: Phase III clinical trial in pediatric psoriasis Trial design Double blind trial Escape group Etanercept weekly Open label treatment Randomized double blind Withdrawal Retreatment Eligible for additional topical therapy Etanercept weekly Screening PASI score worsening of >50% Etanercept weekly 1:1 Placebo weekly PASI 50 not achieved Etanercept weekly PASI 75 not achieved Etanercept weekly 1:1 Placebo weekly Loss of PASI 75 Retreatment with etanercept weekly Randomization 5 Day 1 4 12 24 36 48 WEEK TRIAL POPULATION Patients aged 4 17 years with stable moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis DOSING Etanercept 0.8mg/kg (to maximum intended dose of 50mg) or matching placebo administered subcutaneously once weekly Paller AS, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:241 251.

Etanercept: PASI responses at week 12 PATIENTS (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Placebo Etanercept PASI 50 P ASI 50 PASI 75 P ASI 75 PASI 90 P ASI 90 47 44 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 27 19 11 23 11 13 P<0.005 9 P<0.005 5 3 7 0 2 4 1 6 8 2 10 12 WEEK 71 P<0.001 75 P<0.001 57 Proportions of patients with improvements over baseline in PASI of 50%, 75%, and 90% Paller AS, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:241 251.

Ustekinumab CADMUS Study design = Injection visits Half standard = 60 kg, 0.375 mg/kg; >60 to 100 kg, 22.5 mg; >100 kg, 45 mg Standard = 60 kg, 0.75 mg/kg; >60 to 100 kg, 45 mg; >100 kg, 90 mg Early escape: At week 8, patients with a PASI increase 50% from BL were eligible to start treatment with moderate to high potency topical steroid preparations through week 12 Landells I, et al. JAAD 2015;73(4): 594 603

Ustekinumab: Phase III clinical trial in adolescent psoriasis (CADMUS) RESULTS: % OF PATIENTS 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% PASI75 AT WEEK 12 78.4% 80.6% UST HSD UST SD P<0.001 10.8% PBO SAFETY: Through wk 12: 1 AE: combined UST 47.9% vs 56.8% PBO 1 SAE: UST combined 1.4% vs. 0% PBO Through wk 60: 1 AE: combined UST 81.8% 1 SAE: UST combined 5.5% Discontinuation rates: wk 12 0% and wk 40 8.2% Most common reason: lack of efficacy in 5 patients (4.5%) in combined UST group No dose response observed Landells I et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;73:594 603. No malignancies, MACE, TB, opportunistic infections, anaphylactic reactions, or serum sickness like reactions

ADALIMUMAB IN PEDIATRIC PSORIASIS RESULTS FROM PHASE III CLINICAL TRIAL

Phase 3 Study M04 717: 1 st Head to Head Study in Pediatric Psoriasis A total of 114 subjects were recruited at 38 sites in Canada, the EU, and rest of world (Chile, Mexico, Switzerland, and Turkey). Screening 3 30 days PERIOD A Double blind primary treatment 16 wks PERIOD B Withdrawal no medication up to 36 wks PERIOD C Double blind retreatment 16 wks 1:1:1: randomization ADA 0.8 mg/kg ADA 0.4 mg/kg Subjects who achieved both a PASI 75 and a PGA 0,1 at week 16 were withdrawn from treatment ADA 0.8 mg/kg ADA 0.4 mg/kg Early escape option up to wk 8 A MTX Non responders at wk 16 A Responders with loss of disease control in Period B, proceed to Period C Responders with no loss of disease control wks 0 B 36 B ADA 0.8 mg/kg Completed 16 wks retreatment wks 0 C 16 C PERIOD D Long term Follow up Ada 0.4mg/kg or 0.8 mg/kg Loading dose of Ada at week 0 and eow at week 1; Oral MTX: 0.1 mg/kg at Week 0 and up to 0.4 mg/kg weekly (maximum dose of 25 mg/week) for the duration of Period A; all patient received folic acid Loss of disease control was defined as a worsening of PGA scores in comparison to Week 16A by at least 2 grades after treatment withdrawal Papp K. et al., 23rd World Congress of Dermatology; June 8 13, 2015; Vancouver, Canada ADA: adalimumab; MTX: methotrexate; Wk: week

Patient demographics (Period A) Adalimubab AE, n (%) MTX (n=37) 0.4 mg/kg (n=39) 0.4 mg/kg (n=39) Total (N=114) Female, n (%) 26 (70.3) 18 (46.2) 21 (55.3) 65 (57.0) White, n (%) 34 (91.9) 34 (87.2) 35 (92.1) 103 (90.4) Mean (SD) age, y 13.4 (3.5) 12.6 (4.4) 13.0 (3.3) 13.0 (3.8) BMI percentile, n (%) <5 th (underwight) 1 (2.7) 1 (2.6) 3 (7.9) 5 (4.4) 5 th to 85 th (normal weight) 22 (59.5) 25 (64.1) 21 (55.3) 68 (59.6) 85 th to 95 th (overweight) 6 (16.2) 4 (10.3) 7 (18.4) 17 (14.9) 95 th (obese) 8 (21.6) 9 (23.1) 7 (18.4) 24 (21.1) Mean (SD) Ps duration, y 5.1 (3.8) 4.8 (3.3) 5.0 (3.8) 5.0 (3.6) Family history of Ps, n (%) 11 (30.6)* 15 (38.5) 11 (28.9) 37 (32.7) Mean (SD) %BSA affected 30.3 (21.2) 26.0 (16.2) 27.7 (20.4) 27.9 (19.3) Mean (SD) PASI 19.2 (10.0) 16.9 (5.8) 18.9 (10.3) 18.3 (8.8) PGA, n (%) Clear/minimal 0 1 (2.6) 0 1 (0.9) Mild 1 (2.7) 3 (7.7) 3 (7.9) 7 (6.1) Moderate 19 (51.4) 18 (46.2) 17 (44.7) 54 (47.4) Marked 17 (45.9) 15 (38.5) 17 (44.7) 49 (43.0) Severe 0 2 (5.1) 1 (2.6) 3 (2.6) BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; MTX, methotrexate; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PGA, Physicians s Global Assessment; Ps, Psoriasis. *Data missing for one patient. Papp K. et al., 23rd World Congress of Dermatology; June 8 13, 2015; Vancouver, Canada

Pediatric Study Patient Population INCLUSION CRITERIA Subjects 4 and <18 years of age with severe plaque psoriasis Weight 13 kg Failure to respond to topical therapy; failure, intolerance, contraindication to, or not be candidate for heliotherapy or phototherapy Papp K. et al., 23rd World Congress of Dermatology; June 8 13, 2015; Vancouver, Canada

INCLUSION CRITERIA Subject needed systemic treatment to control his/her disease and met one of the following: PGA 4, OR BSA involved >20%, OR Very thick lesions with BSA >10%, OR PASI >20, OR PASI >10, and at least one of the following: oactive PsA unresponsive to nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) oclinically relevant facial, genital or hand/foot involvement ocdlqi >10 Papp K. et al., 23rd World Congress of Dermatology; June 8 13, 2015; Vancouver, Canada

Primary Efficacy Endpoints in Period A: PASI 75 and PGA 0/1 Response at Week 16 PASI 75 PGA 0/1 70 60 57.9* 70 60 60.5 PASI 75 RESPONSE, % 50 40 30 20 32.4 43.6 PGA 0/1 SCORE, % 50 40 30 20 40.5 41.0 10 10 0 MTX (n=37) ADA 0.4 mg/kg (n=39) ADA 0.8 mg/kg (n=38) 0 MTX (n=37) ADA 0.4 mg/kg (n=39) ADA 0.8 mg/kg (n=38) *P<0.05 ADA 0.8 mg/kg vs. MTX. Non responder imputation. ADA, adalimumab; MTX, methotrexate; PASI75, 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PGA, Physician s Global Assessment. PGA 0/1 is defined as PGA clear or minimal Papp K. et al., 23rd World Congress of Dermatology; June 8 13, 2015; Vancouver, Canada

PASI90/100 Responses at Week 16 (Period A) PASI RESPONSE, % 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 MTX (n=37) ADA 0.4 mg/kg (n=39) ADA 0.8 mg/kg (n=38) 30.8 28.9 21.6 PASI90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 18.4 10.3 2.7 PASI100 ADA, adalimumab; MTX, methotrexate; PASI90/100. 90%/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Papp K. et al., 23rd World Congress of Dermatology; June 8 13, 2015; Vancouver, Canada

Percentage Achieving >PASI 75 100 80 60 40 58.3 50.0 50.0 47.2 38.9 47.2 30.6 75.0 77.8 66.7 47.2 MTX PerA, n=37 ADA 0.8 PerD, n=36 86.1 61.1 61.1 55.6 50.0 83.3 80.6 69.4 77.8 55.6 ADA 0.8 PerA, n=39 ADA 0.8 PerD, n=36 58.3 ADA 0.4 PerA, n=38 ADA 0.4 PerD, n=36 77.8 75.0 52.8 86.1 72.2 47.2 Week 16A 32.4 57.9 43.6 20 27.8 27.8 0 Week 0D 1D 4D 8D 11D 16D 20D 28D 40D 52D Dose groups defined as dose received in Periods A/D. Intent to treat; non responder imputation. Papp K., 24 th EADV congress, 7 11 October 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark

How safe is it?

Summary Few clinical & scientific evidence with current treatment options Different conditions may impact treatment decisions

Summary Efficacy of adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg has been demonstrated in children and adolescents from 4 years and up with moderate severe psoriasis