BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. The North Carolina Medical Board (hereafter "Board")

Similar documents
BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. In re: ) ) NOTICE OF CHARGES Kenneth J. Headen, M.D., ) AND ALLEGATIONS; ) NOTICE OF HEARING Respondent.

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. In Re: ) ) NOTICE OF CHARGES Amir Ishak Kaldas, M.D., ) AND ALLEGATIONS; ) NOTICE OF HEARING Respondent.

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD ) ) ) ) ) The North Carolina Medical Board ( Board ) has preferred

In re: ) ) NOTICE OF CHARGES John E. Marshall, M.D., ) AND ALLEGATIONS; ) NOTICE OF HEARING Respondent. )

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. In re: ) ) Marcono Raymond Hines, M.D. ) CONSENT ORDER ) Respondent. )

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. This matter is before the North Carolina Medical Board. on information regarding Matthew Ray Steiner, M.D.

In re: ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS Joseph Gregory Jemsek, M.D. ) OF LAW, AND ORDER ) OF DISCIPLINE Respondent. ) )

10 BEFORE THE MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA Kimberly Kirchmeyer ("Complainant") brings this Accusation solely in her official

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. This matter is before the North Carolina Medical Board

l. The North Carolina Board of Pharmacy is a body duly organized under the laws

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

BEFORE THE MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Respondent.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS c BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL LICENSING BOARD OF MEDICINE DISCIPLINARY SUBCOMMITTEE

DELTA DENTAL PREMIER

Purpose: Policy: The Fair Hearing Plan is not applicable to mid-level providers. Grounds for a Hearing

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE

Act 443 of 2009 House Bill 1379

Appeal and Grievance Procedure

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF PHARMACY ) ) ) ) THIS MATTER came to be heard before the North Carolina Board ofpharmacy ("Board"),

Opioid Management of Chronic (Non- Cancer) Pain

Grievance Procedure of the Memphis Housing Authority

- and. IN THE MATTER OF: The Medical Act, R.S.N.S , c and SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Rules of Procedure for Screening and Hearing Meetings

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RULES OF PROCEDURE

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY RESPONDENT. AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its undersigned

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D56435 L/hu

FOTO Functional Status Measure Risk Adjustment Procedures

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY

201 KAR 9:270. Professional standards for prescribing or dispensing Buprenorphine-Mono-Product or Buprenorphine-Combined-with-Naloxone.

A resident's salary will continue, during the time they are exercising the Grievance Procedure rights, by requesting and proceeding with a hearing.

Welcome. In case of emergency, contact: Is condition due to an accident? [ ] Yes [ ] No

A M E R I C A N A R B I T R A T I O N A S S O C I A T I O N NO-FAULT/ACCIDENT CLAIMS AWARD OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

Proposed Revision to Med (i)

Legal Issues in Opioid Prescribing

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 776/15

PUBLIC HOUSING: THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING MEDICINE AND SURGERY PRACTITIONERS MANAGEMENT OF PAIN AND OTHER CONDITIONS WITH CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES

GILMER COUNTY SCHOOLS Policy No POLICY MANUAL

Oklahoma. Prescribing and Dispensing Profile. Research current through November 2015.

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Board of Education Upper Marlboro, Maryland Policy No. BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY

(FIRST) (MIDDLE) (LAST) STREET: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE

BEFORE THE MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS. Respondent. PARTIES

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS. LCB File No. R July 6, 2001

METROLINX ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS RULES OF PRACTICE

(A) results from that individual's participation in or training for sports, fitness training, or other athletic competition; or

LEGAL ASPECTS of MEDICAL MARIJUANA Florida Nurse Practitioner Network Annual Conference September 17, 2018

APPEAL NO. 1 SF CASE NO. FINAL ORDER. hearing in the above-referenced matter on October 22, 2015, at approximately APPEARANCES

WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE, INSURANCE CARRIER

How to Conduct a Public Hearing

literature that drug combinations containing butalbital should not be used in treatment of chronic pain and are not appropriate for long term routine

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MASSAGE-THERAPY

Reducing Opioid Deaths: Arizona s Emergency Declaration & Response

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY PETITIONER, RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE OMPLAINT

Subject: Pain Management (Page 1 of 7)

NC General Statutes - Chapter 90 Article 16 1

COMPLETE DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY & Testing Policy

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G JANNIE A. HYMES, EMPLOYEE PINEWOOD HEALTH & REHABILITATION, EMPLOYER

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CABLE FRANCHISE FOR COMCAST

PATIENT FEE SCHEDULE As of January 1, 2017

Proposed Revisions to the Procedure for Adjusting Grievances

Instructions for Applicants. Successful completion of this examination is required as one of the conditions for licensure in the State of Vermont.

DEATH CERTIFICATION SATISH CHUNDRU, D.O. DEPUTY CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER

Dr. Janet L. Yarger 510 Baxter Road, Suite 8, Chesterfield, MO

Standards for Professional Conduct In The Practice of Dentistry

ADOPTED RULES FOR THE UTILIZATION OF OPIOIDS AND PAIN MANAGEMENT TREATMENT IN WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F JOHNNY F. THROWER, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT TRIMAC, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY RESPON DENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its undersigned

PERSONAL INFORMATION. Date of Birth Age (Last) (First) (M.I.) Address City/State Zip. Phone # Home Work Cell

Utah. Prescribing and Dispensing Profile. Research current through November 2015.

(b) Repealed by Session Laws , s. 10, effective October 1, 2002.

Last Name First Name MI SS# DOB. Address. City State Zip. Best Phone# (home/ work/ cell) Alternate # (home/ work/ cell)

CRITICAL POLICY REFERENCE MANUAL FILE CODE: X Monitored X Mandated Sample Policy X Other Reasons

New Patient Form Welcome!

New Patient Questionnaire. Name DOB Date

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2760

Practice Member Profile

AN ACT. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:

Instructions for Applicants. Successful completion of this examination is required as one of the conditions for licensure in the State of Vermont.

[CORRECTED COPY] CHAPTER 115

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS FOR ALCOHOL, DRUG AND GAMBLING COUNSELORS LCB FILE NO. R069-17I

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPISTS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPISTS OF ONTA RIO. - and

Naloxone HCI 4 mg/0.1. nostril. Repeat after 3 minutes if minimal or no

New Patient Paperwork

Employment Contract. This sample employment contract is from Self-Employment vs. Employment Status, CDHA (no date available)

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY

1. What is your chief complaint? Why are you seeking physical therapy treatment? 2. Explain how and when your injury/symptoms occurred:

Birth Date Age Social Security # Marital Status (circle) Have you had chiropractic care in the past? Yes No If yes, how long ago?

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F BILLY R. COOPER, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT FRITO LAY, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT

CSA Briefing Note Regarding Joint Application against the University and Re-Commencing Collection of CFS/CFS-O Fees

THIS FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED BY CANDIDATE.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F GNB TECHNOLOGIES (EXIDE) ZURICH AMERICAN INS. CO.

The Naturopathy Act. being. Chapter 324 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1965 (effective February 7, 1966).

Family Allergy Clinic

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F BRYCE CORPORATION, EMPLOYER OPINION FILED SEPTEMBER 13, 2004

Transcription:

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD In re: Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D., Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CHARGES AND ALLEGATIONS; NOTICE OF HEARING The North Carolina Medical Board (hereafter "Board") has pref erred and does hereby prefer the following charges and allegations: 1. The Board is a body duly organized under the laws of North Carolina and is the proper party to bring this proceeding under the authority granted it in Article 1 of Chapter 90 of the North Carolina General Statutes and the rules and regulations promulgated thereto. 2. On June 16, 1981, the Board issued Dr. Thombs a license to practice medicine, license number 25194. 3. During the times relevant herein, Dr. Thombs practiced in Kings Mountain, North Carolina. 4. Patients A through E presented to Dr. Thombs for care. In each instance, Dr. Thombs provided substandard care to Patients A through E. 5. Patient A presented to Dr. Thombs for left hip pain, low back pain, morbid obesity and dyslipidemia. Patient A monthly for a period of several years. Dr. Thombs saw During this Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 1 of 13

time, Patient A was treated for chronic pain with fentanyl and oxycodone. There is no explanation as to why Patient A is being treated with fentanyl and oxycodone, other than it appears that Patient A received these medications from a prior treating physician. Patient A picked up his prescriptions from Dr. Thombs every month with minimal interaction with Dr. Thombs. 6. Dr. Thombs prescribed the maximum dose of Lipi tor (atorvastatin) to Patient A. At age 35, Patient A's ten year risk for cardiovascular disease, assuming total cholesterol of 300 and HDL cholesterol of 30 is about 4%. Even if Patient A did qualify for statin therapy, an 80 mg dose would be too high. There is no mention in the chart of any prior or intended interventions regarding Patient A's morbid obesity, a BMI (body mass index) of over 45. 7. Dr. Thombs' records for Patient A are below the standard of care. The records are chaotic. An example of the chaotic nature of the records is a note of a physical examination dated 5-22-2012. This exam documents every physical finding as abnormal, including meningismus, pleural rub, abdomen tenderness and guarding, etc. Although clearly an error, this error is never corrected in subsequent charting. Most of the documentation for Patient A's care is either absent or never created. For the documentation that is present, it is all identical template charting that sheds no light on the actual Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 2 of 13

care the patient was receiving. For instance, although Patient A is being treated for hip pain and low back pain, there is no documentation of a spine or hip examination. 8. Patient B presents to Dr. Thombs for hypertension, degenerative disc disease, a history of panic attacks, and bipolar disorder. Dr. Thombs treats all of these conditions. He prescribes Xanax (alprazolam) for the panic attacks, Percocet (oxycodone) for pain, and lisinopril for hypertension. 9. The medical records for Patient B are also chaotic and do not follow a logical sequence. Between June 2010 and February 2012, there are nine print outs of vital signs for Patient B. None of these print outs correspond with any record of an office visit during that same time period. From May 2012 to May 2013, there are 11 documented office visits, approximately one a month. All of these notes are in template form, and except for the subjective portion and vital signs, the rest of the notes are nearly identical with a few slight variations in the assessment and plan. The Review of Symptoms (ROS) portions for the 11 notes are identical. 10. Dr. Thombs failed to treat Patient B's hypertension appropriately. Dr. Thombs never considered whether Patient B suffered from primary or essential hypertension or had secondary hypertension brought about by another condition. In addition, if a diagnosis of essential hypertension is made, then the Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 3 of 13

physician should address those factors that can cause an increase in blood pressure, such as medications taken, salt intake, alcohol use, tobacco use and diet and exercise. Laboratory testing and electrocardiograms (EKG) should be performed and repeated. Dr. Thombs never specifically addressed Patient B's hypertension diagnosis and treatment in a systematic way and obtained no diagnostic information about Patient B's renal and electrolyte status while he was on lisinopril. 11. Dr. Thombs treats Patient B for anxiety. He does so by prescribing 100 pills of 2mg of Xanax monthly. This medication was initiated by a prior physician for Patient B and Dr. Thombs continues it without any explanation. He never seeks to determine if there are any psychosocial factors that may be contributing to Patient B's anxiety. Dr. Thombs never reassesses Patient B nor does he try alternative therapies for Patient B's anxiety or determine if past non-benzodiazepine therapies were attempted so that he may try to wean Patient B off benzodiazepines. This is important given the risk of addiction and accidental overdose when a patient is taking both a benzodiazepine and an opioid at the same time, as Patient B was doing. of Xanax Dr. Thombs simply continues Patient B on 100 pills per month without any mention of reassessment or alternative therapies. Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.O. Page 4 of 13

12. Dr. Thombs treats Patient B's pain in much the same manner as he does Patient B' s anxiety. Dr. Thombs prescribes Patient B five tablets of oxycodone, 10 mg, per day, and is seemingly doing so for the rest of Patient B's life. The oxycodone is ostensibly for a diagnosis of degenerative disc disease, yet there is no data to support the diagnosis and at no time does Dr. Thombs perform an examination of the spine. 13. Patient C presents to Dr. Thombs for anxiety, migraine headaches and low back pain. Dr. Thombs prescribes Xanax for anxiety, hydrocodone for pain and Ultram ER (tramadol) and Maxalt (rizatriptan) for the migraines. Dr. Thombs saw Patient C for approximately 12 visits. In or about April 2014, Patient c is discharged from Dr. Thombs' practice for obtaining duplicate refills. 14. Dr. Thombs treated Patient C for chronic pain. Dr. Thombs did not obtain Patient C's prior medical records to incorporate the patient's prior history and diagnostic information into his care. He did not document in the medical record an appropriate musculoskeletal and neurologic exam, nor did he attempt to resolve Patient C's pain with conservative therapies before initiating opioid therapy. Dr. Thombs did not refer Patient C for specialty assessment for unremitting pain and he failed to make an effort to determine the etiology of Patient C's pain to determine whether it was neuropathic, Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 5 of 13

inflammatory or skeletal. The only spine and neurological examination he did document was normal. This examination does not justify why Dr. Thombs would prescribe 100 tablets of hydrocodone every month, seemingly indefinitely, to an otherwise apparently healthy 34 year old woman. Dr. Thombs continues Patient C on medications she was previously prescribed without any effort to determine the appropriateness of the prior diagnoses or treatment plans. Dr. Thombs fails to take a comprehensive, multi-modality approach to treating Patient C and simply refills medications on a monthly basis without any meaningful assessment and reassessment. 15. Patient D presented to Dr. Thombs for treatment of chronic pain and other co-morbidities, including Hepa ti tis C infection, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), ongoing tobacco use, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, back pain, hip pain, and leg numbness. Patient D had a history of back surgery in 1985. Dr. Thombs prescribed several medications including oxycodone for pain. Print outs of vital signs do not correspond with any office visit. Urine screens that test positive for ketones, protein and urobilinogen are not addressed. 16. It is the standard of care for a physician to take a history and conduct a physical examination, to review old records, to obtain and assess appropriate diagnostic testing, to Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 6 of 13

refer to specialty evaluation, and to incorporate all of these findings into a patient assessment, working diagnosis, and plan of care. Dr. Thombs does not perform a basic evaluation of chest pain, back pain, hip and leg pain, or complaint of headache. Dr. Thombs does not manage the monitoring of Patient D's hypertension and dyslipidemia properly. Dr. Thombs does not offer the patient smoking cessation counseling. He makes no mention in the notes of his plan of action for Patient D's diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Patient D to avoid all alcohol as a Dr. Thombs does not caution result of his Hepatitis C infection. 17. Although possible that Patient D may have thwarted Dr. Thombs' plans of treatment - Patient D did refuse a flu shot - there is almost no documentation that Patient D refused treatment or acted contrary to medical advice. 18. There does not seem to be one single area in Patient D's record where Dr. Thombs properly assessed Patient D in a systematic testing. manner by history, examination and diagnostic It is the standard of care that office visits be documented in such a way to make internal sense and provide a resource for the physician to assess the patient appropriately and make working diagnoses. Coherent charting allows for the planning of care in a longitudinal manner including acute Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 7 of 13

problems, chronic problem management and health maintenance efforts. Dr. Thombs' records do not meet this standard. 19. Patient E is a 59 year old woman who has been under Dr. Thombs' care since at least 1998. Patient E has a heavy burden of illness, including obesity, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, leg pain, joint pain, abnormal gait, anxiety, panic disorder, abnormal gait, and breast cancer. Dr. Thombs prescribes several controlled substances for chronic pain, including tramadol, morphine, oxycodone and hydrocodoneacetaminophen. 2 0. Dr. Thombs does not approach Patient E' s care in a systematic manner, nor does he plan interventions for each condition based on a hierarchy of importance. Dr. Thombs does not manage Patient E's pain over time by periodically reassessing the goals of opioid therapy and the potential for ill effects due to polypharmacy and drug interactions. It is the standard of care when prescribing opioid therapy to be descriptive of the type of pain that is being treated, what the circumstances of the chronic pain are, what treatments and evaluations have been performed in the past, and what are the goals of therapy. It cannot be determined from Dr. Thombs' records whether he is treating hip, leg, shoulder, or breast pain. There is no clarity as to what Dr. Thombs is trying to achieve by prescribing multiple controlled substances and muscle Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 8 of 13

relaxers. In some notes, Patient E describes adverse effects from taking Ultram ER (tramadol) but there is no indication or discussion of possible medication changes. Many of Dr. Thombs' notes for this patient have blank sections. 21. Dr. Thombs fails to provide appropriate care for Patient E's other conditions. There are no laboratory work ups other than point of care urinalysis. There are no imaging studies. There is no reference to colon cancer screening. There is no reference to diabetic eye care. There is no diabetic foot exam. exams or pap smears. There is no reference to breast or pelvic It is the standard of care for a patient with multiple medical problems for the physician to oversee the care of the patient and see that proper laboratory monitoring is being performed for diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia, and that the patient is being offered the opportunity for health maintenance examinations. Dr. Thombs falls below these standards with regard to Patient E. 22. As a result of the concerns raised by Dr. Thombs' management and care of Patients A through E, the Board ordered Dr. Thombs to be assessed by the Center for Personalized Education for Physicians, or CPEP. To date, Dr. Thombs has refused to undergo a CPEP examination. 2 3. Dr. Thomb' s treatment of Patients A through E, as described herein, constitutes unprofessional conduct including, Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 9 of 13

but not limited to, departure from or the failure to conform to the standards of acceptable and prevailing medical practice, irrespective of whether or not a patient is injured thereby, within the meaning of N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-14(a) (6), which is grounds for the Board to annul, suspend, revoke, condition, or limit Dr. Thombs's medical license to practice medicine and surgery issued by the Board or to deny any application he might make in the future. 24. Dr. Thomb' s failure to comply with the Board's Order for an Examination, as described herein, constitutes a failure to respond, within a reasonable period of time and in a reasonable manner as determined by the Board, to inquiries from the Board concerning any matter affecting the license to practice medicine, within the meaning of N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-14 (a) (14), which is grounds for the Board to annul, suspend, revoke, condition, or limit Dr. Thombs's medical license to practice medicine and surgery issued by the Board or to deny any application he might make in the future. NOTICE TO DR. THOMBS Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-14.2, it is hereby ordered that a hearing on the foregoing Notice of Charges and Allegations will be held before the Board, or a panel thereof, on Thursday, February 18, 2016, at 8:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter, at the offices of the Board at 1203 Front Street, Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 10 of 13

Raleigh, North Carolina, to continue until completed. The hearing will be held pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 150B-40, 41, and 42, and N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-14.2, 14.3, 14.5, 14.6 and 14.7 as well as 21 NCAC 32N.0110 and 21 NCAC 32N.0111. You may appear personally and through counsel, may cross-examine witnesses and present evidence in your own behalf. You may, if you desire, file written answers to the charges and complaints preferred against you within thirty (30) days after the service of this notice. The identities of Patients A through E are being withheld from public disclosure pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 90-8. However, this information will be provided upon request. Unless otherwise permitted by the presiding officer, all exhibits shall be provided to the Board electronically. All preliminary motions, including motions for continuances, shall be received at the office of the Board no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the date of the hearing. Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 150B-40(c) (5) and 21 NCAC 32N.OllO(c), it is further ordered that the parties shall arrange a prehearing conference at which they shall prepare and sign a stipulation on prehearing conference. The proposed prehearing stipulation shall be submitted to the undersigned no later than ten (10) days prior to the hearing date. The prehearing Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 11 of 13

conference shall occur no later than seven (7) days prior to the hearing date. The right to be present during the hearing of this case, including any such right conferred or implied by N.C. Gen. Stat. lsob-40 (d) or N. C. Gen. Stat. 90-14. 2 (b), shall be deemed waived by a party or his counsel by voluntary absence from the Board's office at a time when it is known that proceedings, including deliberations, are being conducted, or are about to be conducted. In such event, the proceedings, including additional proceedings after the Board has retired to deliberate, may go forward without waiting for the arrival or return of counsel or a party. This, the 11th day of November, 2015. NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD By: Pascal 0. Udekwu, M.D. President Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 12 of 13

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned attorney for the North Carolina Medical Board, hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing document on Counsel for Respondent by depositing a copy with the United States Postal Service, postage paid, to the following: Alan Schneider Cheshire, Parker, Schneider & Bryan, PLLC 133 Fayetteville St., #500 Raleigh, NC 27601 This, the day 11th of November, 2015. cus Jim' on oard Att rney Notice of Charges and Allegations - Everette Bernard Thombs, M.D. Page 13 of 13