Commentary by R. Little, Ph.D., NGSP Network Coordinator for the NGSP Steering Committee

Similar documents
Commentary by R. Little, Ph.D., NGSP Network Coordinator for the NGSP Steering Committee

College of American Pathologists (CAP) GH2 Survey Data: (updated 12/09) 2009 GH2-B (fresh pooled samples) * = NGSP certified at the time of the survey

State of the Art of HbA1c Measurement

Aina Blood Monitoring System

EQAS. Hemoglobin Program (BC80) Cycle 12: December 2014 December 2015 Sample No: 1 Sample Date: 17 Dec 14. Exceptions. Customer Information

Evidence Based HbA1c Accuracy. Sabrina Koetsier Medical Scientist RCPAQAP Chemical Pathology

New York State Soluble Tumor Markers Proficiency Test

Table. Analytical characteristics of commercial and research cardiac troponin I and T assays declared by the manufacturer.

Commutability studies undertaken by the LNE : the case of lipid and lipoprotein testing. Vincent Delatour, PhD

Evidence Based Commutability: Bias 2 Study. Janice Gill Manager RCPAQAP Chemical Pathology Adelaide SA

(a) y = 1.0x + 0.0; r = ; N = 60 (b) y = 1.0x + 0.0; r = ; N = Lot 1, Li-heparin whole blood, HbA1c (%)

Selecting a Hemoglobin A1C Point of Care Instrument. Objectives. Disclosure / Conflict of Interest 3/11/2015

Diabetes Monitoring: Easy as A-1-C An educational webinar sponsored by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics

Dubrovnik 2014 Sverre Sandberg, Norwegian Quality Improvement of Primary Care Laboratories Noklus, Bergen, Norway

1. PROTOCOL. Comparison Study Summary. Tuality Healthcare 324 SE 9 th Ave. Suite E Hillsboro, OR July 30, 2014

Bio-Rad Laboratories. Cardiac Assessment Controls. Value Assigned for Clinical Laboratory and Point of Care Test Systems

Analysis of Hemoglobin A1c from Dried Blood Spot Samples with the Tina-quant II Immunoturbidimetric Method

Should HbA1C measured by POC instruments be used for diagnosis of diabetes? Sverre Sandberg, Norwegian Quality Improvement of Primary Care

1 PROTOCOL. Comparison Study Summary. Springs Memorial Hospital. Springs Memorial Hospital 800 W. Meeting St. Lancaster, SC (803)

Equalis user meeting Protein HbA1c the mean patient values might have been constant since 2007!

DIAZYME PRODUCT LIST LIST INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS

DIAZYME PRODUCT LIST LIST INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS

Harmonisation of TFTs

Effects of hemoglobin C, D, E and S traits on measurements of hemoglobin A1c by twelve methods

Evaluation of the LIAISON 25 OH Vitamin D TOTAL Assay on the new LIAISON XL analyser

MARTIN FLEISHER, PH.D., FACB MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER NEW YORK, N.Y.

The Integrated Cardiovascular Clinical Network CHSA

Analytical performance specifications two years after Milan conference. Prof Mauro Panteghini CIRME Scientific Coordinator

META -ANALYSIS. Hb A1c by Sebia Capillary Electrophoresis. Analytical performances meta-analysis Second Edition

Gentian Canine CRP Immunoassay Application Note for Abbott Architect * c4000

Smart Diagnostics for Point-of-Care!

Clinical Application of Cardiac Biomarkers in an Accredited Chest Pain Center Laboratory s Best Practices

Confirmation - A Practical Approach

Advisory Committee Minutes

100 Abbott Park Road Abbott Park, IL Trade Name: ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo Assay Approved Date: 18-JUN-2010

Reference Intervals by Age/Sex, N, Median Conc (ng/l) Specimen Type. Non-Heart Failure n = 890 (465 F, 425 M) <45 75+y.

IMMUNOASSAY PREMIUM - LEVEL 3 (IA PREMIUM 3)

Analytic Bias of Thyroid Function Tests. Analysis of a College of American Pathologists Fresh Frozen Serum Pool by 3900 Clinical Laboratories

Advisory Committee Minutes

Electrolyte Analyzer with Ion-Selective Electrode and Blood Gas analyzer

Impact of Troponin Performance on Patient Care

HbA1c enzymatic assay evaluation at AN academic

Gentian Canine CRP Immunoassay Application Note for scil VitroVet*

Troponin Assessment. Does it Carry Clinical Message? Stefan Blankenberg. University Heart Center Hamburg

DIAZYME PRODUCT LIST LIST INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS

What can we learn from EQAs and audits for cardiac marker testing?

Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics

Cardiac Assessment Controls

Serology and International units

Four rules to remember: 1) Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division of SD and/or CV.

What I will talk about

Specificity Characteristics of 7 Commercial Creatinine Measurement Procedures By Enzymatic and Jaffe Method Principles

IL-6 VALIDATIONS. Several suppliers reagents correlate well with R&D Systems HS ELISA, the goldstandard assay normally used in our laboratory.

ACCESS hstni SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE

Determination of hemoglobin is one of the most commonly

Quality Initiative In Pathology. Harmonisation of Laboratory Testing

Selecting a Risk-Based SQC Procedure for a HbA1c Total QC Plan

Report of the first Inter-Laboratory Comparison Test organised by the Community Reference Laboratory for Mycotoxins

assay Introduction Conclusions: The D-100 TM system proved to be a robust and reliable method for HbA 1c

Cardiac Troponin: Current Status and Future Promise

Selecting an A1C Point-of-Care Instrument

Evaluation Report. Eurolyser HbA1c Test Kit on Smart and Cube Analyser

USING THE ACCESS AMH ASSAY IN YOUR LABORATORY

Maintaining Quality in Laboratory Medicine. Glycated Haemoglobin Scheme Guide

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): An evidence-based approach to compare laboratory equipment

California Association for Medical Laboratory Technology Distance Learning Course

Rapid Hemoglobin A1c Testing for Evaluation of Glucose Control

California Association for Medical Laboratory Technology Distance Learning Course

CASE STUDY 3: PSA-STANDARDISATION & VARIABILITY COMPARATIVE STUDY IN HOSPITALS

for simultaneous management of diabetes and screening for thalassemia HbA 1c . We used Capillarys 2 Flex Piercing (Capillarys 2FP) HbA 1c

Comparison of Five Automated Serum and Whole Blood Folate Assays

M E D I C A L L A B O R A T O R Y

Designed with your expertise in mind to manage POC traffic

DIRECT ENZYMATIC HbA1c ASSAY

This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers

2018 HIV and HCV Diagnostic Testing Survey

Bio-Rad Laboratories. Hemoglobin Testing. VARIANT II Hemoglobin Testing System For HbA 1c

: EQA in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands using fresh whole blood samples with target values assigned with the IFCC reference system

Routine serum creatinine measurements: how well do we perform?

Auto HbA1C ANALYZER HbA1LC HPLC 3660

Keywords: albuminuria; albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR); measurements. Introduction

6/6/17. Heart Failure and Natriuretic Peptides. Learning objectives

Individual Lab Report Ci-Trol Nov,2016. Abnormal Fibrinogen (mg/dl) Abnormal Fbg Control - Lot# LFC Your Lab

Hemoglobin A1c: Comparison of Pointe Scientific s 2-Part Direct Hemoglobin A1c with the Bio-Rad Variant II and the Tosoh G8

Basic knowledge of POCT instuments. The Tide Resort Bangsan Beach 18 June 2009

Intermethod Differences in Results for Total PSA, Free PSA, and Percentage of Free PSA

Evaluation Report: Eurolyser CRP test (ST0100 and ST0102) on. CUBE analyser (CA0100)

Accuracy and Precision Performance of the Accu-Chek Mobile System. Introduction. Method

COMPARISON OF CATION EXCHAGE HPLC AND IMMUNOTURBIDIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF HbA1c

HIV Viral Load Quality Assessment Program Summary for Panel HIVVL 2018Oct26

THE HEALTH AND RETIREMENT STUDY: INVESTIGATION OF DRIED BLOOD SPOT HBA1C MEASUREMENT ERRORS USING TIPTEMP STAMPS

*Scott Reutten Abbott Diagnostics. 2) The 2010 Steering Committee minutes were approved by the members present.

Urgent Field Safety Notice

Method Precision and Frequent Causes of Errors Observed in Point-of-Care Glucose Testing. A Proficiency Testing Program Perspective

HEMOGLOBIN A1c MONITORING A GLOBAL STRATEGIC BUSINESS REPORT

HbA1c3 PRINCIPLE REF B ANNUAL REVIEW Reviewed by. Date. Date INTENDED USE

Evaluation of a new hemoglobin A1c analyzer for point- of- care testing

Where is the evidence? Demonstrating the value of laboratory medicine

Mike Hinds, Royal Canadian Mint

Transcription:

College of American Pathologists (CAP) GH5 Survey Data: (updated 8/17) The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends that The A1C test should be performed using a method that is certified by the NGSP. All laboratories performing HbA1c testing should participate in a fresh sample proficiency testing survey such as the College of American Pathologists (CAP). CAP GH5 data for the second survey of 2017 are summarized below. The NGSP target or reference values are based on replicate analyses using eight NGSP certified secondary reference methods. Commentary by R. Little, Ph.D., NGSP Network Coordinator for the NGSP Steering Committee Beginning in 2015 there are two CAP programs for HbA1c proficiency testing using fresh whole blood samples - GH2 and GH5. GH2 samples are shipped twice a year with three samples in each mailing as before. GH5 are shipped three times a year with five samples in each mailing. The three samples in each of the two GH2 mailings are also included in two of the GH5 mailings. Therefore the NGSP follows the three GH5 surveys which include all the samples used for both surveys. In 2017, based on data from the GH5-B survey: Bias from the NGSP target and variability (±2SD) are shown in Table 1 and in figure 1 (ordered by HbA1c level in figure) for each method. The shaded rectangle (fig 1) reflects the current CAP acceptance limit of ±6. Method-specific biases > 0.30 (shaded cells, table) were seen with three methods (Roche cobas c311 for 2 samples, Siemens Advia for 1 sample and Siemens Dimension Vista for 1 sample). Method-specific, between-laboratory CV s ranged from 1.1% to 5.4%. The Siemens Dimension RxL had CVs over 3.5% for three samples; the Siemens Dimension ExL and DCA Vantage had CVs over 3.5% for one sample. There were four methods with CVs 2% for 5/5 samples the Abbott Architect c enzymatic, Alere Afinion, Tosoh G8 and Trinity Biotech Premier. Approximately 78% of laboratories are using methods with between-lab CVs <3% at all five HbA1c levels; approximately 87% of laboratories are using methods with CVs <3.5% at all five HbA1c levels. The current pass limit for the GH5 survey is ±6%. The overall pass rates for this survey were 95.7%, 97.4%, 97.8%, 95.6% and 97.0% for GH5-06 through 10, respectively. For individual methods, the lowest pass rate was 76.2% and the highest was 100%. As expected, methods with small bias and low CVs will have the highest pass rates and, conversely, methods with large bias and/or high CVs will have the lowest pass rates. The overall CVs for the last 18 surveys are shown in Table 2. CVs were NOT <3.5% for all samples in the current survey; GH-07 showed an overall CV of 3.6%. NOTE: The NGSP certification evaluates agreement of each method at the manufacturing site using one lot of reagents and calibrators, one instrument, and one application under optimal conditions. CAP precision reflects between-laboratory reproducibility, often with more than one lot of reagents and calibrators, and sometimes with different instruments (e.g. Cobas Integra 400 & Cobas Integra 800) and/or different applications (e.g. Cobas Integra hemolysate or whole blood application). In addition, if changes were made in the method just prior to NGSP certification, it is possible that not all participating laboratories in the field would have made the change at the time of the CAP survey. For these reasons, it is important that laboratories review not only the certification status of HbA1c methods but also their performance in the CAP survey over time (a good indication of field performance) when selecting or evaluating HbA1c assay methods. 1

TABLE 1: 2017 GH5-B (fresh pooled samples) GH5-06 GH5-07 GH5-08 GH5-09 GH5-10 NGSP %HbA1c Reference Value (95% CI) 7.42 (7.35-7.49) 5.2 (5.13-5.27) 8.31 (8.24-8.38) 10.33 (10.26-10.40) 5.87 (5.80-5.93) no. labs Mean % Mean % Mean % Mean % Mean % Mean bias Mean bias Mean bias Mean bias Mean bias %HbA1c CV %HbA1c CV %HbA1c CV %HbA1c CV %HbA1c CV Abbott Architect c (enzymatic) 158 7.32-0.10 1.3 5.05-0.15 1.7 8.27-0.04 1.1 10.41 0.08 1.1 5.77-0.10 1.3 Alere Afinion 22 7.18-0.24 1.9 5.14-0.06 1.7 8.14-0.17 1.7 10.25-0.08 1.9 5.79-0.08 1.7 Beckman AU 63 7.51 0.09 3.2 5.18-0.02 2.8 8.30-0.01 2.9 10.35 0.02 2.8 5.90 0.03 3.3 Beckman UniCel DxC 103 7.51 0.09 2.9 5.21 0.01 3.2 8.45 0.14 3.0 10.63 0.30 3.2 5.88 0.01 2.4 Bio-Rad D-10 121 7.58 0.16 2.5 5.45 0.25 2.3 8.38 0.07 1.9 10.39 0.06 1.9 6.01 0.14 2.3 Bio-Rad D-100 23 7.33-0.09 2.4 5.20 0.00 2.0 8.13-0.18 1.7 10.06-0.27 1.9 5.83-0.04 1.7 Bio-Rad VII 38 7.59 0.17 2.2 5.33 0.13 1.5 8.42 0.11 2.5 10.56 0.23 2.7 6.01 0.14 1.9 Bio-Rad VII Turbo 62 7.51 0.09 1.7 5.26 0.06 2.1 8.42 0.11 2.0 10.50 0.17 2.2 5.90 0.03 1.9 Bio-Rad VII Turbo 2.0 142 7.50 0.08 2.5 5.30 0.10 2.6 8.31 0.00 2.1 10.40 0.07 2.1 5.92 0.05 2.2 Roche Cobas c311 20 7.21-0.21 2.2 4.87-0.33 3.4 8.19-0.12 3.3 10.32-0.01 3.0 5.56-0.31 3.3 Roche Cobas c500 series 346 7.31-0.11 2.5 5.00-0.20 2.9 8.23-0.08 2.6 10.28-0.05 2.7 5.70-0.17 2.9 Roche Cobas c513 13 7.43 0.01 1.7 5.12-0.08 2.3 8.36 0.05 1.7 10.60 0.27 1.8 5.78-0.09 2.2 Roche Cobas Integra 400 25 7.46 0.04 1.7 5.27 0.07 3.5 8.42 0.11 2.2 10.55 0.22 2.3 5.93 0.06 2.5 Roche Cobas Integra 800 61 7.42 0.00 2.6 5.26 0.06 2.6 8.36 0.05 2.1 10.48 0.15 2.3 5.94 0.07 2.7 Sebia Capillarys 2 FP 36 7.29-0.13 1.7 5.05-0.15 2.2 8.28-0.03 1.4 10.26-0.07 1.3 5.74-0.13 2.1 Siemens Advia 16 7.38-0.04 1.8 5.16-0.04 2.6 8.24-0.07 2.9 9.95-0.38 2.6 5.89 0.02 2.5 Siemens DCA Vantage 148 7.60 0.18 2.8 5.23 0.03 2.7 8.48 0.17 2.7 10.61 0.28 3.6 6.02 0.15 2.6 Siemens Dimension ExL 144 7.61 3 5.30 0.10 3.1 8.28-0.03 2.4 10.48 0.15 2.4 6.03 0.16 3.6 Siemens Dimension RxL 13 7.62 0.20 3.7 5.25 0.05 5.2 8.31 0.00 3.2 10.47 0.14 3.0 5.98 0.11 5.4 Siemens Dimension Vista 282 7.70 0.28 2.6 5.25 0.05 2.9 8.25-0.06 2.4 9.97-0.36 2.0 6.04 0.17 2.8 Siemens Dimension Xpand 11 7.71 0.29 2.6 5.33 0.13 2.2 8.37 0.06 2.5 10.46 0.13 2.0 6.05 0.18 3.4 Tosoh G8 Auto HPLC 319 7.57 0.15 1.4 5.38 0.18 1.7 8.42 0.11 1.4 10.51 0.18 1.4 6.02 0.15 1.5 Trinity Biotech Premier 69 7.38-0.04 1.9 5.21 0.01 2.0 8.39 0.08 1.8 10.51 0.18 1.9 5.91 0.04 1.9 167 7.47 0.05 2.6 5.21 0.01 2.0 8.34 0.03 2.8 10.51 0.18 2.9 5.92 0.05 2.4 (Ortho Clin Diag) Vitros 5,1 FS, 4600, 5600 Gray shading indicates bias > 0.3% HbA1c or CV > 3.5% Note: these are arbitrary limits chosen to highlight methods with the highest bias and CV.

Figure 1: Bias and Variability from the NGSP Target 3

4

Table 2: Overall Variability for 2010-2017 for all GH participants Mailing Sample# # of labs Target 5 All method mean S.D. C.V. 01 2573 5.9 6.03 0.23 3.9 A-2010 02 2566 9.8 9.73 0.39 4.0 03 2581 7.4 7.43 0.31 4.2 04 2693 5.2 5.34 0.21 4.0 B-2010 05 2691 8.7 8.67 0.33 3.8 06 2685 6.3 6.37 0.23 3.5 01 2652 8.5 8.58 0.28 3.2 A-2011 02 2645 5.4 5.52 0.20 3.5 03 2649 6.4 6.51 0.21 3.2 04 2877 6.3 6.36 0.24 3.8 B-2011 05 2872 7.6 7.69 0.29 3.8 06 2871 9.2 9.28 0.34 3.7 01 3298 5.6 5.62 0.20 3.5 A 2012 02 3316 9.4 9.44 0.37 3.9 03 3301 7.2 7.28 0.29 3.9 04 3222 5.4 5.51 0.21 3.9 B2012 05 3208 8.3 8.31 0.31 3.7 (HbAS) 06 3172 5.65 5.75 0.32 5.6 A 2013 01 2816 7.1 7.12 0.25 3.5 02 2829 9.3 9.39 0.31 3.3 03 2840 6.1 6.13 0.24 3.9 04 2912 8.1 8.04 0.31 3.8 B2013 05 2907 5.3 5.33 0.20 3.8 06 2908 6.4 6.17 0.24 3.9 01 3277 6.5 6.60 0.25 3.8 A2014 02 3267 7.0 7.09 0.27 3.8 03 3253 9.7 9.72 0.33 3.4 04 3278 6.58 6.64 0.23 3.5 B2014 05 3273 8.39 8.45 0.30 3.6 06 3266 5.65 5.67 0.21 3.6 01 3237 6.79 6.82 0.25 3.6 02 3246 10.28 1 0.36 3.5 A2015 03 3252 6.82 6.82 0.25 3.6 04 2365 8.63 8.63 0.30 3.4 B2015 C2015 A2016 05 2362 5.32 5.36 0.18 3.4 06 2379 5.84 5.87 0.20 3.5 07 2392 11.71 11.68 0.44 3.8 08 2402 9.53 9.50 0.33 3.5 09 2386 5.04 5.08 0.17 3.4 10 2403 7.38 7.35 0.26 3.5 11 12 13 14 15 3284 3285 3286 2410 2408 11.69 5.93 5.17 8.14 9.30 11.68 5.95 5.20 8.12 9.25 0.47 0.17 0.24 0.29 4.1 3.3 3.3 2.9 3.2 01 3358 5.32 5.33 0.16 3.1 02 3365 9.17 9.21 0.28 3.0 03 3357 5.31 5.33 0.16 3.1 04 2425 12.03 12.12 0.40 3.3 05 2419 5.94 5.96 0.16 2.8

B2016 C2016 A2017 B2017 06 2433 5.27 5.27 0.15 2.8 07 2427 10.59 10.55 0.33 3.1 08 2440 6.20 6.17 0.18 2.9 09 2428 12.23 12.21 0.44 3.6 10 2443 7.51 7.52 0.20 2.7 11 12 13 14 15 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 3377 3402 3372 2432 2442 3418 3393 3409 2461 2460 2446 2445 2450 2443 2457 9.11 6.01 11.71 5.02 7.58 6.41 9.53 5.34 8.51 7.25 7.42 5.20 8.31 10.33 5.87 9.08 5.99 11.69 5.02 7.58 6.45 9.56 5.35 8.58 7.33 7.49 5.22 8.33 10.38 5.91 0.24 0.16 0.39 0.16 0.20 0.28 0.17 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.31 2.6 2.6 3.4 3.2 2.5 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.7 2.6 3.0 3.6 2.5 3.0 3.2 CVs below 3.5% are highlighted in pink 6