3D titanium interbody fusion cages sharx. White Paper

Similar documents
Am I eligible for the TOPS study? Possibly, if you suffer from one or more of the following conditions:

WHAT IS SMART SPINAL FUSION?

5/19/2017. Interspinous Process Fixation with the Minuteman G3. What is the Minuteman G3. How Does it Work?

Patient Information MIS LLIF. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

ProDisc-L Total Disc Replacement. IDE Clinical Study.

Patient Information MIS TLIF. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Patient Information MIS TLIF. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Alamo T Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody System Surgical Technique

Patient Information MIS LLIF. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

O.I.C. PEEK UniLIF Unilateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Apache Cervical Interbody Fusion Device. Surgical Technique. Page of 13. LC-005 Rev F

Int J Clin Exp Med 2018;11(2): /ISSN: /IJCEM Yi Yang, Hao Liu, Yueming Song, Tao Li

Original Date: October 2015 LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION FOR

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE. CONSTRUX Mini PTC. Mini PTC Spacer System

The Fusion of Power and Performance.

CROSS -FUSE P E E K V B R / I B F SYST E M

5/27/2016. Stand-Alone Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion (LLIF) vs. Supplemental Fixation. Disclosures. LLIF Approach

nvp Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion System

nvt Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion System

Aesculap CeSpace TM PEEK and CeSpace TM XP Spinal Implant System Instructions for Use

ProDisc-L Total Disc Replacement. IDE Clinical Study

The Role of Surgery in the Treatment of Low Back Pain and Radiculopathy. Christian Etter, MD, Spine Surgeon Zürich, Switzerland

Departement of Neurosurgery A.O.R.N A. Cardarelli- Naples.

Patient Information. Spinal Fusion Using the ST360 or Silhouette Pedicle Screw System

Royal Oak IBFD System Surgical Technique Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF)

PARADIGM SPINE. Brochure. coflex-f Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion

PARADIGM SPINE. Anterior Cervical Fusion Cage. Cervical Interbody Fusion

University of Groningen. Thoracolumbar spinal fractures Leferink, Vincentius Johannes Maria

PARADIGM SPINE. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion. Interlaminar Stabilization

The Fusion of. Strength, Design. Performance. and

nva Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion System

EIT TLIF Cage. For Natural Bone Ingrowth with EIT Cellular Titanium

Surgical Technique. Apache Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Get back to: my life. Non-fusion treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE MANUAL. InterFuse T

Interbody fusion cage for the transforaminal approach. Travios. Surgical Technique

LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS

Surgical Technique INTERSOMATIC CERVICAL CAGE

DISCLOSURES. Goal of Fusion. Expandable Cages: Do they play a role in lumbar MIS surgery? CON 2/15/2017

VLIFT System Overview. Vertebral Body Replacement System

SynCage. Surgical Technique. This publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. Instruments and implants approved by the AO Foundation.

Interspinous Fusion Devices. Midterm results. ROME SPINE 2012, 7th International Meeting Rome, 6-7 December 2012

Surgical Technique. Apache Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Apache Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

SpineFAQs. Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Innovative Techniques in Minimally Invasive Cervical Spine Surgery. Bruce McCormack, MD San Francisco California

Adult Spinal Deformity Robert Hart. Dept. Orthopaedics and Rehab OHSU

MAS TLIF MAXIMUM ACCESS SURGERY TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AN INTRODUCTION TO

TABLE OF CONTENTS. ShurFit Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion (ACIF) System Overview 2. Implant Specifications 3. Instrument Features 4

ELY ASHKENAZI Israel Spine Center at Assuta Hospital Tel Aviv, Israel

ACP1 CERVICAL PLATE SPINAL SYSTEM SURGICAL TECHNIQUE GUIDE II.

Induction and Maintenance of Lordosis in MultiLevel ACDF Using Allograft. Saad Khairi, MD Jennifer Murphy Robert S. Pashman, MD

Thoracic or lumbar spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson s disease -A two-center experience of 32 cases-

Alamo C. Cervical Interbody System Surgical Technique. An Alliance Partners Company

ACP. Anterior Cervical Plate System SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

U.S. MARKET FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS

The Implant. (Klappen außen sind nur 192 mm breit!) Ordering information. You start we help with our clearly arranged Starter Kit:

Solitaire Anterior Spinal System

JCSC INTRODUCTION. Rudolf Morgenstern, MD, PhD

Patient Information ACDF. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

/ 66 nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 n-ha/pa66

PARADIGM SPINE. Patient Information. Treatment of a Narrow Lumbar Spinal Canal

If you have a condition that compresses your nerves, causing debilitating back pain or numbness along the back of your leg.

EFSPINE CERVICAL COMBINED SET DISC PROTHESIS ORGANIZER BOX

REFERENCE DOCTOR Thoracolumbar Trauma MIS Options. Hyeun Sung Kim, MD, PhD,

SpineFAQs. Cervical Disc Replacement

SynCage-C short. Surgical Technique. This publication is not intended for distribution in the USA.

Advantage ALIF. Keith Shevlin Managing Director

SYNEX The vertebral body replacement with ratchet mechanism

Contact Fusion Cage. Surgical Technique

Spondylolysis. Lysis (Greek λύσις, lýsis from lýein "to separate") refers to the breaking down.

You Don t Understand This Stuff???

EIT Cellular Titanium

Product Overview. VariLift -L. Expandable Interbody Fusion Device. A proven solution for stand-alone fusion

Original Article Management of Single Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Decompression Alone or Decompression and Fusion

PROCEDURES WE PERFORM

C-THRU Anterior Spinal System

Quality of Life. Quality of Motion. A Patient s Guide to. Artificial Lumbar Disc Replacement

ECD EXPANDABLE CORPECTOMY DEVICE Continuously Expandable Vertebral Body Replacement for Tumour Cases

Surgical technique. SynCage-C short

L-VARLOCK. Posterior Lumbar Cage with adjustable lordosis. S urgical T echnique

LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS

Fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine and thoracolumbar transition

Lumbar Facet Joint Replacement

Surgical technique. synex. The vertebral body replacement with ratchet mechanism.

PREPARED FOR. Marsha Eichhorn DATE OF INJURY : N/A DATE OF ANALYSIS : 12/14/2016 DATE OF IMAGES : 12/8/2016. REFERRING DOCTOR : Dr.

Synex System TECHNIQUE GUIDE. An expandable vertebral body replacement device

Posterior. Lumbar Fusion. Disclaimer. Integrated web marketing. Multimedia Health Education

Thoracolumbar Spine Locking Plate (TSLP) System. A low-profile plating system for anterior stabilization of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Free Paper Session IX Spine II

product overview Implant heights range from 8mm-20mm in 2mm increments, with two lordocic angle options of 6 and 12.

Degenerative spondylolisthesis at the L4 L5 in a 32-year-old female with previous fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: A case report

Instituto de Patologia da Coluna, Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sao Paulo/SP, Brazil

VTI INTERFUSE T SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FORWARD THINKING FOR THE BACK. 1/20

Original Policy Date

Module: #15 Lumbar Spine Fusion. Author(s): Jenni Buckley, PhD. Date Created: March 27 th, Last Updated:

Biomechanics of Interspinous Process Fixation and Lateral Modular Plate Fixation to Support Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)

Technique Guide. ECD Expandable Corpectomy Device. Continuously Expandable Vertebral Body Replacement for Tumour Cases.

SynCage Surgical Technique

Transcription:

3D titanium interbody fusion cages sharx (SLM selective laser melted) Goal of the study: Does the sharx intervertebral cage due to innovative material, new design, and lordotic shape solve some problems of currently available cages? White Paper prepared by ti2b international GmbH, October 2015 Dr. Ulrich Hubbe Head of Spine Surgery Division, Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Freiburg White Paper prepared by ti2b international GmbH, December 2015 page 1 of 7

sharx a lordotic shaped interbody fusion cage made of titanium trabecular sintered structure (SLM). Fusion rate, imaging artefacts and 12 months clinical follow up outcome. U. Hubbe, Head of Spine Surgery Division, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg The aim of this study The new sharx intervertebral cage promises to solve problems of some previously available cages by its innovative material, the new design, and the strong lordotic shape. In the study the laser-sintered titanium material is named trabecular material, because the porosity trabecular titanium surface promises - similar to titanium dental implants - a fast and direct ingrowth into the bone and thus a low non-union. The trabecular structure also reduces the amount of metal per unit volume, so that artefacts in the MRI/CT image forming should be lower. The new design does not present a large graft cavity, which is intended in the previous designs for filling with bone graft. Characterized is the bearing surface of the cages, as it is increased and a subsidence of the cage into the adjacent end plates will be reduced. The strong lordotic cage shape of 12 degrees helps to support the restoration of the reduced sagital balance, which occurs within the scope of the degeneracy of the spine lordosis. In a clinical study, the clinical and imaging results of operated patients should be evaluated with respect to these facts. Material and Method The data of 22 patients treated at the lumbar spine, 3 patients at the thoracic spine in the context of 360 degrees spondylodesis having 1 to 4 cages (38 cages total) were collected for a retrospective evaluation of the prospectively collected data. Clinical data (VAS pain), patient satisfaction, neurological status, and imaging findings (pre and post- op CT, X-ray images and functional spinal radiographs) have been collected during routinely evaluation. The image being affected by metal artifacts were evaluated on the postoperative radiographs and CT images. In addition in 3 cases, an MRI was performed postoperatively, so the image quality could be judged. Results In all 38 supplied levels with cage fusion in postoperative CT and functional images, mobility (to 1.3 degrees, 0.1 degrees average) could be detected after one year. The lordosis was increased in all patients by an average of 7 degrees (2-14 degrees). A shift of the C7 lots took place on average by -17mm (+ 12mm -53mm). Distraction by cage (pre- to post- surgical) was on average 5mm (0mm - 16mm), subsidence of cage into the adjacent endplate (pre- to post OP 1 year) was in average 1mm (0mm 13mm). In all cases a reduction to preoperative pain was evaluated. 21 patients had a positive result (excellent or good by MacNab criteria) on 4 patients moderate results (1 chronic pain patient preoperatively). The degradation of image quality due to metal artifacts of cages proved in the radiographs and CT images was surprisingly low. Even the formation of new bone within the cages has been documented and measured in HU units. In the White Paper prepared by ti2b international GmbH, December 2015 page 2 of 7

3 cases, where a postoperative MRI was available, the picture quality showed only in the immediate vicinity of the cages (2-3mm) extinction by metal artifacts. All cases had a good assess ability of the spinal cord, the nerve roots as well as the internal structure of the adjacent vertebrae. Discussion and Conclusions The proven fusion rate of 100% is excellent given the reported fusion rates in the literature (65-100%). The determination of fusion was carried out with the current gold standard of multi-planar CT imaging, but also by flexion extension recording X-ray that are in use for FDA purpose in the USA. The increase of lumbar and segmental lordosis through proven distraction was evaluated. After 1 year no subsidence and migration into the vertebral endplate was reported as well as no loss of lordosis created by the interbody fusion device. This is also reflected by the improvement of the sagital balance parameters and should in the longer term effect the patient clinical outcome. The image quality was affected - neither in the radiographs, nor in the CT scans. The assessment of new bone formation inside the cage and threw out the trabecular structure has have been analyzed. In particular, no significant artifacts have been shown in the MRI, so that the relevant neural structures and the internal structure of the vertebral bodies were always well assessable. This is a significant improvement in imaging properties, especially when compared with cages made of solid titanium or even tantalum. The study results demonstrate, that the new laser-sintered trabecular titanium cage, has met all expectations. The new material leads to a high fusion rate, although no graft is introduced into the cage, and titanium implants creates extremely low artefacts in X-ray, CT, and MRI imaging. A controlled distraction and sagital alignment can be obtained and remains stable, until the bony fusion occurs, without significant migration into the end plates. The lordotic implant shape improves the lumbar alignment and corrects with permanently good result the sagital balance. THREE POST-OPERATIVE CASE REPORTS CASE REPORT 1 Symptoms: 64 year old male with increasing load dependent immobilising lumbar back pain, Pain increased several years after previous fusion surgery 13 years before. Facet blocks lead to partial pain relief for short time periods only. Imaging CT demonstrated severe degeneration in the L3/L4 level adjacent to the fused levels (L4 to S1). Cystic degeneration of the endplates and vacuum phenomenon in the disc space was visible as well as increased bone density around the endplates (images a + c). In addition spondylolysis was detectable on parasagital images. Functional x-rays showed increased mobility of the segment. Full spine x-ray showed only mild sagital imbalance. Diagnosis Degenerative spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grad I). Therapy White Paper prepared by ti2b international GmbH, December 2015 page 3 of 7

With patient in prone position the spondylodesis was prolonged to L 3 decompression of the spinal canal, distraction of the intervertebral disc space and interposition of a 12 lordotic shaped sintered titanium OLIF* cage with bone graft via a left sided minimal invasive TLIF approach, and posterior fixation with pedicle screw / rod instrumentation in lordotic position was performed. implant-bone interface, the favourable biomechanical properties of the titanium material, the 12 lordotic angulation of its endplates and the optimized shape for the minimal invasive diagonal positioning of the cage. In addition the implant causes minimal artefacts in x-ray, CT and MRI, which has advantageous for postoperative imaging. Result During the postoperative course the patient reported significant reduction of the lumbar back pain (VAS 7/10 to 2/10). He was mobilized on the first postoperative day and was discharged pain free on the 6 th postoperative day. The postoperative x-rays showed an improved lordotic shape of the lumbar spine (57 versus 48 preoperatively) and the implants in the correct position. At final follow up after 1 year the lumbar back pain was completely eliminated and the patient was back at work, working 8 to 10 hours a day. No significant change in the shape of the lumbar spine and no subsidence of the cage could be observed. CT scans (thin slice spiral scan) at final follow up demonstrated solid bony fusion with bony bridging anterior and lateral to the cage. In addition bone formation could also be verified inside the cage via regional Hounsfield Unit (HU) measurement (average 1011 HU inside and 536 HU outside the cage). Comment For interbody support the sintered titanium OLIF* cage sharx / ti2b international GmbH was chosen, because of the capability of a close CASE REPORT 2 White Paper prepared by ti2b international GmbH, December 2015 page 4 of 7

White Paper prepared by ti2b international GmbH, December 2015 page 5 of 7

CASE REPORT 3 left side and a spondylolisthesis (Meyerding Grade I). Functional X-rays showed mobility of the spondylolisthesis. Full spine X-ray showed no signs of severe sagital imbalance. Diagnosis Degenerative spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grad I) with consecutive stenosis of the lateral recess L3 / 4 left sides combined with a synovial cyst. CASE REPORT 4 MRI compatibility Patient history and background Symptoms A 75 year old female with history of load dependent lumbar back pain and radiating pain in the left leg according to the L4 dermatome since three months. Pain is increasing in the last weeks leading to a reduced walking distance of 500m. Half a year before decompression of a lumbar stenosis had been performed in L 2 / 3 and L 3 / 4 on both sides via a unilateral approach from the right side. Imaging MRI images show lateral recess stenosis caused by a synovial cyst in L3 / 4 on the Therapy Surgery was performed: With patient in prone position a percutaneous spondylodesis L3 / 4 was performed with distraction of the intervertebral disc space, interposition of a 12 lordotic shaped sintered titanium OLIF* cage via a left sided minimal invasive TLIF approach, transplantation of local bone in and around the cage and fixation with a pedicle screw / rod instrumentation in lordotic position. In addition the synovial cyst on the left side was resected. Due to osteoporosis of the spine the screws were cement augmented. Result During the postoperative course the patient reported complete relief of the radiating pain into the left leg and of the lumbar back pain. She was mobilized on the first postoperative day and was discharged pain free on the 6 th postoperative day. The postoperative X-rays showed an improved lordotic shape of the lumbar spine (45 versus 33 preoperatively) and the implants in the correct position. During the follow up (seven weeks) no significant change in the shape of the lumbar spine and no subsidence of the cage could be observed. White Paper prepared by ti2b international GmbH, December 2015 page 6 of 7

The postoperative MRI, which was performed 16 days after the operation showed, a good local decompression and no signs of postoperative bleeding. Comment For interbody support the sintered titanium OLIF* cage sharx / ti2b international GmbH was chosen, because of the capability of a close implant-bone interface, the favourable biomechanical properties of the titanium material, the 12 lordotic angulation of its endplates and the optimized shape for the minimal invasive diagonal positioning of the cage. In addition the implant causes minimal artefacts in X-ray, CT,and MRI, which is advantageous for postoperative imaging. This can easily be observed on the postoperative MRI images, where the artefact of the cage is limited to few millimetres in the immediate neighbourhood of the cage. The spinal canal and even the surrounding disc tissue can be evaluated distortion free. Preoperative sagital MRI showing the narrowed spinal canal L3 / 4 and the synovial cyst. Postoperative sagital MRI demonstrating distraction and reduction of the L3 / 4 levels. Note minimal artefacts around the cage and distortion free delineation of the spinal canal. Images 1a/b: preoperative and postoperative X-ray: showing improved lumbar lordosis by 12 according to the 12 lordosis of the implanted sharx cage. Image 1a/b: pre and postoperative X-ray Note the minimal artefacts around the cage and distortion free delineation of the spinal canal and even of the disc. image 2b: preoperative MRI. White Paper prepared by ti2b international GmbH, December 2015 page 7 of 7