West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2018: June 23

Similar documents
West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2018: For week ending July 7

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2017: August 19

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2017: September 2

Manitoba Weekly West Nile virus Surveillance Report

MANITOBA HEALTH, HEALTHY LIVING & SENIORS WEEKLY WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE REPORT (WEEK 34)

MANITOBA HEALTH, HEALTHY LIVING & SENIORS WEEKLY WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE REPORT (WEEK 36)

MANITOBA HEALTH, HEALTHY LIVING & SENIORS WEEKLY WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE REPORT (WEEK 31)

Alberta s Response Plan (2005)

Arbovirus Surveillance in Massachusetts 2016 Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) Arbovirus Surveillance Program

WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE IN MADISON AND DANE COUNTY

Massachusetts Arbovirus Surveillance and Response Plan

Wetlands and West Nile

West Nile Virus in the Region of Peel 2002

Controlling Urban Epidemics of West Nile Virus Infection

Alberta West Nile virus wild bird surveillance 2006

2012 Abundance Avg Abundance Abundance

FMEL Arboviral Epidemic Risk Assessment: Fourth Update for 2010 Week 22 (May 31, 2010)

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT SERVICES HALDIMAND-NORFOLK. West Nile Virus Report

NORTH SHORE MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT 2018 Surveillance Summary

The Incursion and Expansion of West Nile Virus into Canada

Outbreak investigation

Alberta West Nile virus wild bird surveillance 2004

CITY OF FORT COLLINS AUGUST 2017 MONTHLY REPORT

Monthly Summaries. Mosquito and West Nile Virus Surveillance. May through August 2007

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

NEBRASKA ARBOVIRUS SURVEILLANCE AND MOSQUITO MONITORING PROGRAM 2018 UPDATE #2

FMEL Arboviral Epidemic Risk Assessment: Seventh Update for 2010 Week 36 (September 09, 2010)

WNV, Italian approach. Simonetta Pupella

ADULT MOSQUITO SURVEILLANCE. Introduction

Chatham County WNV Outbreak, What the heck are they doing down there? Robert A. Moulis Pamela T. Thompson Chatham County Mosquito Control

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

western Canadian mustard 2003

Evidence Based Considerations for Adult Mosquito Control

West Nile Virus and Other Mosquito-borne Diseases National Surveillance Report English Edition September 11 to September 17, 2016 (Week 37)

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

Global Climate Change and Mosquito-Borne Diseases

WNV surveillance and prevention of transfusion transmission in Italy

Zoonotic Disease Report June 03 June 09, 2018 (Week 23)

West Nile Virus Update. April 15, 2014

West Nile Virus Surveillance in mosquito vectors (Culex pipiens)

Protecting You and Your Community from West Nile Virus. Eagle County Environmental Health Department

West Nile Virus and Other Mosquito-borne Diseases National Surveillance Report English Edition September 18 to September 24, 2016 (Week 38)

West Nile Virus Los Angeles County

ALBERTA WEST NILE VIRUS Summary Report

Fight The Bite. Michelle Cole Auburn University Outreach Director

West Nile Virus Program Final Report West Nile Virus. Mosquito BIle ProI8ctIon. .~...aodllogll""",,~-,iiiciuciiif~_8fici""""""

Vector-Borne Diseases Summary Report

Perspectives on the Mosquitoes of Wisconsin and the Upper Midwest

Mosquito Control Matters

West Nile Virus Surveillance and Response Plan

Epidemiological Profile of West Nile Virus in Kent County, Michigan

Vector-Borne Diseases Summary Report

West Nile Virus. Lyndon Badcoe PhD Epidemiologist

Evaluation of the West Nile Surveillance System for the State of Kansas

Analysis of West Nile Virus in Franklin County, Pennsylvania

Mosquitoborne Viral Diseases

UNDERSTANDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL DRIVERS INFLUENCING THE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RISK OF VECTOR BORNE DISEASES

2015 Mosquito Abatement Plan QUALITY OF LIFE & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MARCH 23, 2015

University of California Research in Coachella Valley: a quarter century of collaboration

Mosquito Threats in Burbank West Nile virus and Zika Update. Presented by Kelly Middleton, Director of Community Affairs

Mosquito Threats in LA County West Nile virus & Zika

West Nile Virus Activity in Harris County, Texas Rudy Bueno, Jr., Ph.D. Division Director, HCPHES Mosquito Control

LIST OF APPENDICES. Appendix B Ontario Regulation 558/91 Specification of Communicable Diseases

Quality of western Canadian mustard 2008

West Nile virus and Other Mosquito borne Diseases National Surveillance Report English Edition

Dallas County Health and Human Services Arbovirus Surveillance Report Week 39 ending September 29, 2018

Collecting Anopheles in Loudoun County,

West Nile Virus. By Frank Riusech

Clinical Information on West Nile Virus (WNV) Infection

West Nile Virus. Family: Flaviviridae

Metropolitan Mosquito Control District. Metropolitan counties working together to prevent insect transmitted disease and annoyance since 1958

Managing Flea Beetles in Canola Julie Soroka

MOSQUITO CONTROL PLAN

Disease Carrying Insects

WEST NILE VIRUS AND OTHER MOSQUITO-BORNE DISEASE NATIONAL SURVEILLANCE REPORT

State of Oregon West Nile Virus Summary Report 2008

IPM & the West Nile Virus Epidemic, Greece, Terms to Know. Which is more dangerous? Florida and Thessaloniki, Greece

Vector-Borne Diseases Summary Report

I. Provincial West Nile Virus Program Information

TREATING THE REHAB PATIENT WITH WEST NILE VIRUS. Amy J. Wilson MD Medical Director, Baylor Institution of Rehabilitation January 2014

West Nile Virus and West Nile Encephalitis Frequently Asked Questions

Vector-Borne Disease Report. West Nile Virus, Lyme Disease and Eastern Equine Encephalitis Surveillance and Control Activities for 2013

State of Oregon West Nile Virus Summary Report

Establishment and Implementation of A Scalable Vectorborne Disease Response Plan at the Local Level Oklahoma City-County Health Department

INJURY OR DEATH FROM WEST NILE, ZIKA OR OTHER VIRUSES VECTORED BY MOSQUITOES

Thomas McGee, L.C. 920 Main Street, Suite 1700 Kansas City, MO (816) * Toll Free (800) WEST NILE VIRUS

Quality. western Canadian Canola 2017 ISSN Véronique J. Barthet Oilseeds Program Manager. Contact: Véronique J. Barthet

Arboviral Surveillance and Control Annual Report: Pennsylvania, 2014

2006 West Nile Virus in the Region of Peel

Vector-Borne Diseases Summary Report

EPIDEMIOLOGY SURVEILLANCE REPORT Northeast Region. Namitha Reddy Regional Coordinator North/Central West Region

UNDERSTANDING ZIKA AND MOSQUITO BORNE ILLNESSES

VIRGINIA ARBOVIRAL ACTIVITY IN David N. Gaines, Ph.D. VDH Office of Epidemiology

Vector Hazard Report: CHIKV in the Americas and Caribbean

Of Mice, Men and Mosquitoes

WEST NILE VIRUS AND OTHER MOSQUITO-BORNE DISEASE NATIONAL SURVEILLANCE REPORT

DISEASE OUTBREAK

2000s. 1900s. 1800s. Dengue Dog heartworm EEE La Crosse Malaria SLE WEE. Dengue Malaria Yellow Fever

WEST NILE VIRUS HISTORY

Transcription:

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2018: June 23 Table of Contents 1. West Nile virus transmission risk page 2 2. Degree day accumulations page 3 3. Mosquito surveillance results page 5 4. West Nile virus animal cases page 7 5. West Nile virus human cases page 8 saskatchewan.ca

1. West Nile virus transmission risk (week ending June 23, 2018) No infected West Nile virus positive mosquitoes have been found, to date, in 2018. The risk of transmission to humans is minimal to low but is expected to rise in July. Mosquitoes are most active on warm evenings and between dusk and dawn. The risk of acquiring West Nile virus (WNV) infection in humans depends on various factors including time of year, number and location of infected Culex tarsalis mosquitoes, and number of days with sufficient heat. Culex tarsalis is a common summer mosquito throughout the agricultural portions of Saskatchewan, and is abundant in the southern areas of the province where it is hotter and drier. It is rarely found in the northern forested areas. The risk of WNV transmission is low in the spring but often rises through the early and midsummer period, reaching a peak during the latter part of July and August. The WNV risk levels may vary from minimal, when Culex tarsalis mosquitoes are rare and the weather has not been conducive for virus to cycle in mosquitoes and birds, to high when there are high numbers of infected mosquitoes and the weather and habitat conditions have been optimal for mosquito development, biting activity and transmission of the virus to humans. Risk levels are determined in Saskatchewan through mosquito surveillance indicators such as Culex tarsalis numbers and infection rates, degree day or heat accumulation and other relevant weather factors such as precipitation. The level of risk in mosquitoes is determined by using infection rates in mosquitoes (expressed as the number of infected mosquitoes/1000) and risk index calculated as: the infection rate X the average Culex tarsalis per trap night/1000). Other relevant factors that help determine risk to humans include: time of year, the status of mosquito larval populations, past and predicted weather patterns, adult mosquito population age and trend, proximity to populated areas and other indicators such as positive birds or horses. West Nile Virus Risk Minimal - The mosquito species that carries WNV has not been detected. This does not mean risk is zero. Low - The mosquito species that carries WNV has been detected in small numbers. There is a low probability of being bitten by an infected mosquito. Moderate - WNV mosquitoes have been detected in numbers where there is a moderate probability of being bitten by an infected mosquito. High - High numbers of WNV positive mosquitoes have been identified and are widespread. There is an increasing and high probability of being bitten by an infected mosquito. 2

2. Degree day accumulations Warm dry conditions in May resulted in a rapid accumulation of degree day heat units. However, the rate of accumulation has slowed with the cooler temperatures that occurred throughout much of the province in early June. The highest accumulation of degree days this season, to date, has been in southern Saskatchewan (Figure 1). Figure 1: Degree day accumulations Prairie Provinces (June 18, 2018) Note: The map covers the agricultural portion of Prairie Provinces. There is more habitat and higher numbers of Culex tarsalis in the southern portion of this area. Culex tarsalis is rarely found in forested areas. Map courtesy of Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. 3

Degree day: a measurement of heat accumulation from April 1. The threshold temperature below which WNV development and transmission is unlikely to occur in Culex tarsalis mosquitoes is 14.3 C. Degree days are calculated by subtracting the threshold or base temperature from the daily mean temperature. These are then summed to provide the total accumulation for the season. Example: Mean daily temperature = 19.3 C; threshold temperature = 14.3 C; 19.3-14.3 = 5.0 degree days. Degree days are used in two ways. First, during the season a running total of accumulated degree days is recorded. On average, it takes approximately 250 to 300 degree days (base 14.3 C) before the second generation of Culex tarsalis emerges. Females of this generation are most numerous and are largely responsible for transmission of WNV to humans. A total of 109 degree days are required for virus development to be completed within a particular population and for potential transmission to occur. The risk of WNV transmission increases with increasing degree day accumulation. Moreover, consistently warmer temperatures will significantly shorten virus development time in the mosquitoes. This increases the potential risk of WNV transmission, if the virus is present and other conditions are favourable. 4

3. Mosquito surveillance results, 2018 The first generation of Culex tarsalis has emerged in low numbers in southern and parts of central Saskatchewan. Numbers and infection rates of the first generation are low resulting in a lower risk to humans. Low numbers of Culex tarsalis were caught these past two weeks. Cool nighttime temperatures limited biting and egg laying activities to a few hours in the evening and early overnight period. Total mosquito numbers are below normal in most areas due to the drier conditions in May that have significantly reduced mosquito habitat. Numbers will rise in those areas that received significant rainfall over the week. Number of Culex tarsalis mosquitoes Table 1: Average number of Culex tarsalis mosquitoes captured by date and ecological risk area, 2018 Surveillance Week ending (1) Boreal Forest Ŧ (2) Boreal Transition (3) Moist Mixed-Grass Prairie Aspen Parkland (4) Mixed-Grass Prairie Jun 9 - - 0.89 1.33 Jun 16 - - 1.00 1.00 Jun 23 Jun 30 Jul 7 Jul 14 Jul 21 Jul 28 Aug 4 Aug 11 Aug 18 Aug 25 Sep 1 Sep 8 Average - - 0.95 1.17 Notes: *Averages are determined by dividing the total number of Culex tarsalis mosquitoes caught by the total number of trapping nights. Ŧ Due to extremely low numbers of Culex mosquitoes, trapping is generally not done in the Boreal Forest ecological risk area. Trapping does not begin in the Boreal Transition ecological risk area until mid- July. 5

Number of mosquito pools testing positive Table 2: Number of WNV positive mosquito pools *, percent positive pools and total number of pools tested by date and ecological risk area, 2018 Ŧ Week Ending (2) Boreal Transition (3) Moist Mixed-grass Prairie-Aspen Parkland (4) Mixed-grass Prairie Weekly Totals Positive Tested Percentage Positive Tested Percentage Positive Tested Percentage Positive Tested Percentage Jun 9 - - - 0 8 0 0 7 0 0 15 0 Jun 16 - - - 0 9 0 0 8 0 0 17 0 Jun 23 Jun 30 Jul 7 Jul 14 Jul 21 Jul 28 Aug 4 Aug 11 Aug 18 Aug 25 Sep 1 Sep 8 Total - - - 0 17 0 0 15 0 0 32 0 Notes: * Mosquito Pool - Mosquitoes of the same species, collected from the same trap on the same date are pooled together for the purposes of laboratory testing. Culex mosquitoes (including Culex tarsalis, Culex restuans and Culex territans) collected from one trap on a given night are placed in pools of 1-50 mosquitoes for WNV testing. Other species, most notably Culiseta inornata, are occasionally placed in pools and tested as well. When more than 50 mosquitoes are collected from the same trap, multiple pools are tested. A positive pool refers to the detection of WNV in one or more mosquitoes collected from a given trap. Percent positive pools are calculated as follows: (Number of positive pools) X 100 = Percent positive pools (Total number tested) Ŧ Due to extremely low numbers of Culex mosquitoes, trapping is generally not done in the Boreal Forest ecological risk area. Trapping does not begin in the Boreal Transition risk area until mid- July. 6

4. West Nile virus animal cases, 2018 Infections in animals such as horses are seasonal and often occur later in the season. The virus is well established in mosquito vectors in Saskatchewan. As WNV infections in horses lag behind infections in mosquitoes, mosquito surveillance provides more timely information about the risk to the general public. Infections in horses can provide an indication that infections in humans may be occurring as well. Table 3: Number of West Nile virus positive horses by date and ecological risk area, 2018 Week ending (1) Boreal Forest (2) Boreal Transition (3) Moist Mixed-Grass Prairie-Aspen Parkland (4) Mixed-Grass Prairie Weekly totals Jun 9 0 0 0 0 0 Jun 16 0 0 0 0 0 Jun 23 Jun 30 Jul 7 Jul 14 Jul 21 Jul 28 Aug 4 Aug 11 Aug 18 Aug 25 Sep 1 Sep 9 Total 0 0 0 0 0 7

5. West Nile virus human cases, 2018 and 2003-2017 As with horses, human infections are seasonal and are often not detected until later in the season. Mosquito surveillance and other environmental risk indicators provide a more timely indication of risk. Table 4: West Nile virus surveillance in humans, 2018 (as of week ending June 16, 2018) Number of WNV Positive Lab Tests* WNV Neuroinvasive Disease Ŧ WNV Deaths 0 0 0 Notes: * Includes tests done by the Roy Romanow Provincial Laboratory and Canadian Blood Services. Personal information including clinical symptoms and exposure histories is not available. There may be multiple positive tests for one person. A positive laboratory test does not necessarily indicate a current WNV infection - it may show a WNV infection from the previous year or a cross-reaction with other viruses. As WNV infection may be transmitted through blood products, Canadian Blood Services screens all blood donations. Ŧ The most useful indicator for the burden of disease in the general population is WNV neuroinvasive disease. About 1 in 5 people who are infected develop a fever and other symptoms. About 1 out of 150 infected people develop a serious, sometimes fatal, illness. The vast majority of people with WNV infections do not seek medical care. Table 5: Saskatchewan Human West Nile virus neuroinvasive cases 2003-2017* Year Neuroinvasive Cases Deaths 2003 63 7 2004 0 0 2005 6 3 2006 3 0 2007 76 6 2008 1 0 2009 0 0 2010 0 0 2011 0 0 2012 0 0 2013 7 1 2014 1 0 2015 0 0 2016 0 0 2017 1 0 Total 158 17 Note: *Deaths are included in WNV Neuroinvasive disease case numbers except for 2003 when two deaths occurred in people with non-neuroinvasive West Nile Fever. 8