HEARTMATE II LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM. HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device

Similar documents
HEARTMATE 3 LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM

HEARTMATE 3 LVAD WITH FULL MAGLEV FLOW TECHNOLOGY THEIR FUTURE STARTS WITH YOU

Is it time to consider a HEARTMATE LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE (LVAD)?

LIVING A MORE ACTIVE LIFE. with the HeartMate 3 LVAD for the treatment of advanced heart failure RON. Recipient

Destination Therapy SO MUCH DATA IN SUCH A SMALL DEVICE. HeartWare HVAD System The ONLY intrapericardial VAD approved for DT.

Ventricular Assist Devices for Permanent Therapy: Current Status and Future

Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Management of Heart Failure

Mechanical assist patient selection, device selection, and outcomes

Knowing your treatment options can give you hope for a longer, better life

CARDIOMEMS HF SYSTEM HOW TO STAY ABOVE HEART FAILURE: TALKING TO YOUR PATIENT ABOUT THE

Status of Implantable VADs

Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) Long Term Outcomes

Risk Factors for Adverse Outcome after HeartMate II Jennifer Cowger, MD, MS St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana

LVADs as Destination Therapy: When Best Practice Criteria Meets the Real World

A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device. Final Report of the MOMENTUM 3 Trial

LVADs as a long term or destination therapy for the advanced heart failure

What has INTERMACS Taught Us about Patient Outcomes with Durable MCS? James K. Kirklin, MD

BETTER HEART FAILURE MANAGEMENT FROM THE COMFORT OF YOUR HOME

เอกราช อร ยะช ยพาณ ชย

1/21/2016. HeartMate II Indications for Use. Ventricular Assist Device Overview. Jon G. Echterling MSN, CCRN, FNP-BC. Learning Objectives

Intrapericardial Left Ventricular Assist Device for Advanced Heart Failure

LVAD Complications, Recovery

End Stage Heart Failure - Time to Bring the Hammer Down

MCSD Pump Thrombosis : Industry Perspective

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES

Complications of Left Ventricular Assist Device Chronic Support. Dr. Tal Hasin RMC, Beilinson, Petach-Tiqva, Israel

Lessons learned from ENDURANCE, ROADMAP, MedaMACS, and how to go forward?

HeartWare ADVANCE Bridge to Transplant Trial and Continued Access Protocol Update

Outpatient Treatment of MCS Patient. F. Bennett Pearce, MD Professor of Pediatrics Med Director Heart Transplant COA

Novel Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES. POLICY NUMBER: CATEGORY: Technology Assessment

Japanese Multicenter Outcomes With the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device in Patients With Small Body Surface Area

When to implant VAD in patients with heart transplantation indication. Aldo Cannata Dept of Cardiac Surgery Niguarda Ca Granda Hospital Milano

Japanese Multicenter Outcomes With the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device in Patients With Small Body Surface Area

CHANGING THE WAY HEART FAILURE IS TREATED. VAD Therapy

Ramani GV et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:180-95

Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes in Commercial Use Compared With the Prior Clinical Trial

PROVEN. TRUSTED. COMMITTED. HeartWare HVAD System

New Trends and Indications for LVADs

Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs): Overview and Future Directions

Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) in 2017: What is New and Different?

LVADS IN AMBULATORY PATIENTS CLASS III PATIENT SHOULD UNDERGO LVAD IMPLANTATION

Outcomes in Advanced Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy

Further devices to treat heart failure

Readmissions: an unavoidable nemesis

EMS: Care of the VAD Patient. Brittany Butzler BSN RN VAD Coordinator Froedtert and the Medical College of WI

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 60, No. 1, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /$36.

Modern Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD) : An Intro, Complications, and Emergencies

Left Ventricular Assist Devices LVAD. North Country EMS Program Agency 3/21/12

None. Declaration of conflict of interest

CARDIOMEMS HF SYSTEM PATIENT MANAGEMENT CLINICAL QUICK GUIDE

Krabatsch et al. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery (2017) 12:23 DOI /s

Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?

EMS and Nursing Considerations in VAD Patient Care

Fifth INTERMACS annual report: Risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients

VAD come Destination therapy nell adulto con Scompenso Cardiaco

Ventricular Assist Device: Are Early Interventions Superior? Hamang Patel, MD Section of Cardiomyopathy & Heart Transplantation

AUTOLOGS TM ATLAS ON DEMAND DATA WITH EVERY PATIENT VISIT

Overview of MCS in Bruce B Reid, MD Surgical Director Artificial Heart Program/Heart Transplantation

A Fully Magnetically Levitated Circulatory Pump for Advanced Heart Failure

Concomitant Aortic Valve Procedures in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Continuous-Flow LVADs: An INTERMACS Database Analysis

QUICK REFERENCE HEARTWARE HVAD PUMP FLOW INDEX

HFA- ESC criteria for Advanced HF and US Requirements for Destination Therapy

Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS): What Every Pharmacist Needs to Know!

Outcomes in Advanced Heart Failure Patients with Left Ventricular. Assist Devices for Destination Therapy

INTRO LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE (LVAD) ACUTE MCS MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT (MCS)

3/1/2017. Chronic Mechanical Support for Heart Failure. Heart Failure is a major driver of morbidity and mortality in the US 1-7

CONFIRM Rx INSERTABLE CARDIAC MONITOR CONTINUOUS HEART MONITORING LIVE LIFE WITHOUT SKIPPING A BEAT

Update on Mechanical Circulatory Support. AATS May 5, 2010 Toronto, ON Canada

Mechanical Circulatory Support for the Failing Heart Progress, Pitfalls and Promises

Perioperative Management of the Mechanical Circulatory Support Patient. American Association of Thoracic Surgeons Allied Health Symposium May 4, 2013

Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting

Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support - What to Use

DRG STIMULATION FOR CHRONIC PAIN FOCUS ON YOUR LIFE NOT YOUR PAIN

Predicting Survival in Patients Receiving Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES OF MECHANICAL CARDIAC ASSIST

Repeated Ramp Tests on Stable LVAD Patients Reveal Patient-Specific Hemodynamic Fingerprint

07/17/2014. Thursday, July 17, 14

Do we really need an Artificial Heart? No!! John V. Conte, MD, Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Understanding the Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device

Advances in Advanced Heart Failure Therapies. Disclosures. Management Algorithm for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock

Clinical Policy: Total Artificial Heart Reference Number: CP.MP.127

Destination Life in Japan and the United States: A new lifestyle for heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices

Ventricular Assist Device (VAD)

Originally indicated as a bridge to transplantation, left

Mechanical Circulatory Support for Unstable Heart Failure

Implantable Ventricular Assist Devices and Total Artificial Hearts. Policy Specific Section: June 13, 1997 March 29, 2013

Challenges to MCS Use in the Middle East

Surgical Options for Advanced Heart Failure

Challenges in Anticoagulation During MCS

End-Stage Heart Failure Care: Advances in Technology and Patient Survival

INPATIENT REIMBURSEMENT PROSPECTUS

LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES WHERE DOES PALLIATIVE MEDICINE FIT?

Diagnosis of Device Thrombosis


DRG STIMULATION FOR CHRONIC PAIN FOCUS ON YOUR LIFE NOT YOUR PAIN

Destination Therapy For Advanced Heart Failure

Acute Circulatory Support Should We or Shouldn t We?

New ventricular assist devices. FW Mohr Clinical seminar: Devices for severe heart failure ESC congress Stockholm 2010

Transcription:

HEARTMATE II LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device

HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device UNPARALLELED REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE Over 25,000 heart failure patients have received the HeartMate II LVAD. Many have passed the 5-year milestone on therapy, with some still on therapy after 10-plus years living proof for over a decade that HeartMate II LVAD delivers predictable surgical and clinical performance for improved outcomes. 1-5 The HeartMate II LVAD, along with the HeartMate 3 LVAD, make up the HeartMate LVAD Portfolio to deliver innovation, experience and outstanding outcomes 4-7, 8 setting the standard in heart failure LVAD therapy.

EXPERIENCE MAKES A DIFFERENCE HeartMate II LVAD is the most widely used and extensively studied LVAD in the world, with more patients treated and multiple clinical data published in top peer-reviewed journals. 7 UNPARALLELED REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE OVER 25,000 Patients implanted with the HeartMate II LVAD 6 UNMATCHED CLINICAL EVIDENCE 1,7,9-13 OVER 900 CLINICAL OR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS 7* ROADMAP Trial (2017) Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Heart Failure 9 PREVENT Trial (2016) Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 10 DT Post-Approval Study (2014) Journal of the College of Cardiology 1 BTT Post-Approval Study (2011) Journal of the American College of Cardiology 11 DT Trial (2009) New England Journal of Medicine 12 BTT Trial (2007) New England Journal of Medicine 13 *HeartMate II LVAD publications as of July 11, 2017. Above numbers are cumulative. The total number of publications in 2016 include the publications from prior years.

PREDICTABLE PERFORMANCE FOR IMPROVED OUTCOMES The HeartMate II LVAD delivers predictable surgical and clinical performance for improved outcomes in both bridge-to-transplantation and destination therapy. 1-5 HEARTMATE II LVAD SHOWS IMPROVED SURVIVAL OVER TIME IN LVAD TRIALS **4 100 90 80 Percentage Survival 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 Months HM II DT: Jorde, JACC 2014 HM II DT: Park, Circ HF 2012 HM II DT: Slaughter, NEJM 2009 VE DT LVAD REMATCH: Rose, NEJM 2001 XVE DT LVAD: Slaughter, NEJM 2009 Novacor DT LVAD INTrEPID: Rogers, JACC 2007 OMM REMATCH: Rose, NEJM 2001 XVE DT LVAD: Slaughter, NEJM 2009 Chart content based primarily on Jorde JACC 2014. HEARTMATE II LVAD LONG-TERM SURVIVAL RATES APPROACH THOSE OF TRANSPLANTATION **4,14 68 % HEARTMATE II LVAD SURVIVAL RATES 4 82 % 2-year survival TRANSPLANTATION SURVIVAL RATES 14 2-year survival ** Based on published data from multicenter experience and separate studies, which may involve different patient populations and other variables. Not a head to head comparison. Data presented for informational purposes only. Please refer to the HeartMate II LVAD Instructions for Use about indications, contraindications, adverse events, warnings, and precautions.

SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS IN FUNCTIONAL CLASS AND QUALITY OF LIFE 80% of HeartMate II LVAD recipients reverse many of the symptoms of their heart failure condition. 15 HEARTMATE II LVAD OFFERS PATIENTS IMPROVEMENT IN NYHA CLASS 15 More than 80% of patients improved to NYHA Class I/II from NYHA Class IIIB/IV by 6 months, with sustained improvement of 78% through 24 months. 15 > 80 % 6 MONTHS (n = 276) 78 % 24 MONTHS (n = 162) HEARTMATE II LVAD OFFERS PATIENTS IMPROVEMENT IN 6-MINUTE WALK DISTANCE 16 At baseline, only 16% of those tested completed the 6-minute walk test at an average of ~200 meters. At six months, 94% of those tested completed the test at an average of ~340 meters. 16 16 % could complete at baseline 16 > 340 m 94 % could complete at 6 months 16

PREDICTABLE ADVERSE EVENT PROFILE The HeartMate II LVAD adverse event profile allows surgeons to implant with confidence. LOWERED ADVERSE EVENTS WITH COMMERCIAL USE 1 Device-related Infection 0.47 53 % 0.22 Bleeding Requiring Surgery 0.09 0.23 61 % Stroke 0.13 0.083 36 % Events per Pt-year DT Trial (n = 133) DT Post-approval Trial (n = 247) REDUCTION IN THROMBUS WITH ADHERENCE TO PREVENT RECOMMENDATIONS 10 4.8 % CONFIRMED PUMP THROMBOSIS EVENTS at 6 months 10 LOW PUBLISHED STROKE RATES *** HeartMate II LVAD Recent Studies ENDURANCE 4 N = 148 2 Years 204 PT YEARS ROADMAP 9 N = 94 2 Years 68.7 PT YEARS PREVENT 10 N = 300 6 Months MOMENTUM 3 8 N = 138 6 Months Stroke (%/EPPY) 12.1% / 0.09 11.7% / 0.09 6.7% 10.9% Ischemic (%/EPPY) 8.1% / 0.06 8.5% / 0.06 4.0% 6.5% Hemorrhagic (%/EPPY) 4.0% / 0.03 4.3% / 0.03 2.7% 5.8% ***Based on published data from multicenter experience and separate studies, which may involve different patient populations and other variables. Please refer to the HeartMate II LVAD Instructions for Use about indications, contraindications, adverse events, warnings, and precautions.

FLEXIBILITY TO TREAT MORE PATIENTS HeartMate II LVAD is indicated for patients in NYHA Class IIIB and IV, and is clinically proven for both short and long-term support. Bridge-to-Transplantation (BTT) Mechanical circulatory support for certain cardiac transplantation candidates who are at risk of imminent death from non-reversible left ventricular failure. Destination Therapy (DT) Mechanical circulatory support for certain patients in end-stage left ventricular failure who are not candidates for cardiac transplantation. THE HEARTMATE II LVAD SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR AN ACTIVE LIFESTYLE 15,16 Wearable external batteries Two rechargeable 1-pound batteries deliver up to 12 hours of uninterrupted support on a single charge HeartMate II LVAD Assists the heart in circulating blood throughout the body External pocket controller Controls the LVAD, and is small and light enough to fit in a pocket Durable, percutaneous driveline Sends power and operating signals to the LVAD from the pocket controller Mobile Power Unit Lightweight, discreet and highly portable

1. Jorde, U. P., Kushwaha, S. S., Tatooles, A. J., Naka, Y., Bhat, G., Long, J. W.,... & Birks, E. J. (2014). Results of the destination therapy post-food and drug administration approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a prospective study using the INTERMACS registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 63(17), 1751-1757. 2. Kirklin, J. K., Naftel, D. C., Pagani, F. D., Kormos, R. L., Stevenson, L. W., Blume, E. D.,... & Young, J. B. (2015). Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 34(12), 1495-1504. 3. Estep, J. D., Starling, R. C., Horstmanshof, D. A., Milano, C. A., Selzman, C. H., Shah, K. B.,... & Kasirajan, V. (2015). Risk assessment and comparative effectiveness of left ventricular assist device and medical management in ambulatory heart failure patients: results from the ROADMAP study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 66(16), 1747-1761. 4. Rogers, J. G., Pagani, F. D., Tatooles, A. J., Bhat, G., Slaughter, M. S., Birks, E. J.,... & Gregoric, I. D. (2017). Intrapericardial Left Ventricular Assist Device for Advanced Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 376(5), 451-460. 5. Grady, K. L., Naftel, D., Stevenson, L., Dew, M. A., Weidner, G., Pagani, F. D.,... & Young, J. (2014). Overall quality of life improves to similar levels after mechanical circulatory support regardless of severity of heart failure before implantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 33(4), 412-421. 6. Abbott. Data on file. SJM-HM-1016-0031(1). 7. Based on clinical or scientific publications on HeartMate II LVAD as of July 24, 2017. SJM-HM-0817-0090. 8. Mehra, M. R., Naka, Y., Uriel, N., Goldstein, D. J., Cleveland, J. C., Colombo, P. C., MOMENTUM 3 Investigators (2016). A fully magnetically levitated circulatory pump for advanced heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):440-450. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610426. Epub 2016 Nov 16. 9. Starling RC, Estep JD, Horstmanshof DA, Milano CA, et al; ROADMAP Study Investigators (2017). Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results. JACC Heart Fail, 2017 Mar 30. 10. Maltais S., et al. PREVENtion of HeartMate II Pump Thrombosis Through Clinical Management: The PREVENT multi-center study. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2017 Jan;36(1):1-12. Epub 2016 Nov 16. 11. Starling, R. C., Naka, Y., Boyle, A. J., Gonzalez-Stawinski, G., John, R., Jorde, U., et al (2011). Results of the post-u.s. Food and Drug Administration-approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation. A prospective study using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57(19), 1890-1898. 12. Slaughter, M. S., Rogers, J. G., Milano, C. A., Russell, S. D., Conte, J. V., et al (2009). Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow ventricular assist device. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(23), 2241-2251. 13. Miller, L. W., Pagani, F. D., Russell, S. D., John, R., Boyle, A. J., et al (2007). Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(9), 885-896. 14. The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation. Registries/Overall Heart Transplantation Statistics. Available at: http:// www.ishlt.org/registries/slides.asp?slides=heartlungregistry. Accessed September 23, 2016. 15. Park S. J., Milano, C. A., Tatooles, A. J., Rogers, J. G., Adamson, R. M., Steidley, D. E., et al (2012). Outcomes in advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy. Circulation Heart Failure, 5(2), 241-248. 16. John, R., Naka, Y., Smedira, N. G., Starling, R., Jorde, U., Eckman, P., et al (2011). Continuous flow left ventricular assist device outcomes in commercial use compared with the prior clinical trial. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 92(4), 1406-1413. 17. Yancy, C., Jessup, M. (2013, June 2012). 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. Circulation, 128(16), e240-e327. 18. Mancini, D., Lietz, K. (2010). Selection of cardiac transplantation candidates in 2010. Circulation, 122(2)173-183. Caution: US federal law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician. Abbott One St. Jude Medical Dr., St. Paul, MN 55117 USA, Tel: 1.651.756.2000 SJM.com St. Jude Medical is now Abbott. Rx Only Brief Summary: Prior to using these devices, please review the Instructions for Use (IFU) for a complete listing of indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, potential adverse events and directions for use. Indications: The HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System is indicated for use as a bridge to transplantation for cardiac transplant candidates who are at risk of imminent death from non-reversible left ventricle failure. It is also indicated for use in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IIIB or IV end-stage left ventricular failure, who have received optimal medical therapy for at least 45 of the last 60 days, and who are not candidates for cardiac transplantation. The HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System is intended for use both inside and outside of the hospital, or for transportation of Left Ventricular Assist Device patients via ground ambulance, airplane, or helicopter. Contraindications: The HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System is contraindicated for patients who cannot tolerate, or who are allergic to, anticoagulation therapy. Adverse Events: Adverse events that may be associated with the use of the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System are listed below. Adverse events are listed in decreasing order of frequency, except for death, which appears first because it is a non-reversible complication: Death, Bleeding (perioperative or late), Cardiac arrhythmia, Local infection, Respiratory failure, Device malfunction, Sepsis, Right heart failure, Driveline or pump pocket infection, Renal failure, Stroke, Neurologic dysfunction, Psychiatric episode, Peripheral thromboembolic event, Hemolysis, Hepatic dysfunction, Device thrombosis, Myocardial infarction Warnings: A thorough understanding of the technical principles, clinical applications, and risks associated with left ventricular support is necessary before using the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System. Read the IFU before attempting implantation of the Left Ventricular Assist Device or before caring for HeartMate II patients. Completion of Thoratec s HeartMate II LVAD Surgical Training Program is also required prior to use. Understanding the operating and safety aspects of the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System is critical for safe and successful use. All users, including clinicians, patients, and caregivers, must be trained on system operation and safety before use. All users, including clinicians, patients, and caregivers, must be trained on any HeartMate II power accessories (Power Module, Battery Charger, or HeartMate 14 Volt Lithium-Ion batteries) before use. Do not use the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device in pregnant women or in women likely to become pregnant. A growing fetus may dislodge the pump, which may result in device failure, catastrophic bleeding, or death. Instruct women of childbearing age to use reliable contraception if sexually active. Blood thinners have been associated with birth defects. Anticoagulation regimens are contraindicated during pregnancy. Certain parts of the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System are not compatible with other HeartMate systems (such as the XVE Left Ventricular Assist System). Only use HeartMate II parts with the HeartMate II system. Do not try to repair any of the HeartMate II system components. If components need service, contact appropriate personnel. Please consult your doctor or the St. Jude Medical website for a complete list of risks. Please refer to the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System Instructions for Use for additional warnings and precautions (http://www.thoratec.com/medical-professionals/resource-library/ifus-manuals/heartmate-ll-lvad.aspx). Indicates a trademark of the Abbott group of companies. Indicates a third party trademark, which is property of its respective owner. 2017 Abbott. All Rights Reserved. 22774-SJM-HM-0317-0061a Item approved for global use.