BEEF QUALITY AND YIELD GRADING D. R. ZoBell, D. Whittier, and Lyle Holmgren

Similar documents
2016 Commercial Steer Study Guide

2019 Commercial Steer Study Guide

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

Beef Grading. Dr. Gretchen Hilton Assistant Professor Meat Judging Team Coach

26 Specifications and Grading Systems for Beef: Japan, USA, Korea and Australia

Carcass Terminology. Goal (learning objective) Supplies. Pre-lesson preparation. Lesson directions and outline

SUMMARY: This document makes amendments to the United States Standards for Grades of

THE EFFECT OF BREED GROUP AND AGE AT FEEDING ON BEEF CARCASS COMPOSITION

Source: Aggie Meats. Prepared by: Cara-Lee Haughton PWF Carcass Committee (March 2006) 1

Why Meat Judging? Assuring Quality Care for Animals Signature Program In-Service Lyda G. Garcia, PhD 9 November 2015

(Key Words: Implants, Holstein, Tenderness, Yields, Beef.)

UTILIZATION OF VIDEO IMAGE ANALYSIS IN PREDICTING BEEF CARCASS LEAN PRODUCT YIELDS

MEATS EVALUATION & TECHNOLOGY

EFFECTS OF COMBINATION ANABOLIC IMPLANTS ON BOXED- BEEF YIELDS OF SERIALLY SLAUGHTERED STEERS

ESTIMATION OF BEEF CARCASS CUTABILITY USING VIDEO IMAGE ANALYSIS, TOTAL BODY ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OR YIELD GRADE

Pr oject Summar y. Cataloging Beef Muscles A Review of Muscle Specific Research from Fed and Non-fed Cattle

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTAL VITAMIN D 3 ON MEAT TENDERNESS 1

Phenotypic Characterization of Rambouillet Sheep Expressing the Callipyge Gene: II. Carcass Characteristics and Retail Yield 1

2011 North Dakota State Meat CDE Written Test

FACTORS INFLUENCING INTERMUSCULAR FAT DEPOSITION IN THE BEEF CHUCK

To Market. To Market. Contents:

MEATS EVALUATION AND TECHNOLOGY Updated 3/17/14

THESIS EFFECTS OF USDA CARCASS MATURITY ON EATING QUALITY OF BEEF FROM FED STEERS AND HEIFERS THAT HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED INTO MATURITY GROUPS

SUPPLEMENTAL VITAMIN D 3 AND BEEF TENDERNESS

Meat technology update

A survey of beef muscle color and ph 1

THE EFFECT OF OPTAFLEXX ON GROWTH, PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS TRAITS OF CALF-FED HOLSTEIN STEERS FED TO HARVEST A SUMMARY OF FOUR POST-APPROVED STUDIES

IMPLANT EFFECTS ON CARCASS COMPOSITION AND MEAT QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY DIET

Predicting Tenderness in Beef Carcasses by Combining Ultrasound and Mechanical Techniques

Genetic Correlations of Fatty Acid Concentrations with Carcass Traits in Angus-Sired Beef Cattle

EFFECT OF RACTOPAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE ON BEEF CARCASS COMPOSITION AND ESTIMATES OF INTERMUSCULAR FAT KARY RIGDON KENT, B.S. A THESIS MEAT SCIENCE

L. A. Kinman, D. L. VanOverbeke, C. R. Richards, R. B. Hicks and J. W. Dillwith STORY IN BRIEF

Characterization of Certified Angus Beef steaks from the round, loin, and chuck

Relationship Between Carcass End Points and USDA Marbling Quality Grades: A Progress Report

Effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride and zilpaterol hydrochloride withdrawal time on beef carcass cutability and tenderness

To Market MODULE 2 // Inspection Federal Meat Inspection State Meat Inspection Kosher Inspection Halal Beef

The Effect of Hot Muscle Boning on Lean Yield, Cooler Space Requirements, Cooling Energy Req uiremen ts, and Retail Value of the Bovine Carcass

Body Composition and Sensory Characteristics of Pork from CLA-Fed Pigs

Breed Differences and Heterosis Effects for Carcass and Meat Palatability Traits in an Angus-Brahman Multibreed Cattle Population

Authors: Key Words: Vitamin E, Vitamin D 3, Shelf-Life, Tenderness, Beef Color

AS-1178, September 1999

Ethanol Co-products Beef Quality Implications

Growth and Characterization of Individual Backfat Layers and Their Relationship to Pork Carcass Quality

Consumer Preference for Pork Quality

Over the past 30 years, nutritional aspects of beef continually

Pork Evaluation. Convergent Ag Media, LLC

*LX EDWARD ALBERT LUGO, MASTER'S THESIS. fulfillment of the. submitted in partial. requirements for the degree MASTER OP SCIENCE

Expected Progeny Differences (EPD) provide producers

Meat Standards Australia Breeding for Improved MSA Compliance & Increased MSA Index Values

Comparison of growth rates in the tissues of primal cuts of Canadian composites

ph as a Predictor of Flavor, Juiciness, Tenderness and Texture in Pork from Pigs in a Niche Market System

Health of Finishing Steers: Effects on Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Tenderness

NATIONAL BEEF : UNDERSTANDING AND ACTION FSIS 2011 MANDATORY NUTRITIONAL LABELING REGULATION

Effect of Glycerol Level in Feedlot Finishing Diets on Animal Performance V.L. Anderson and B.R. Ilse NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

May 2008 AG/Soils/ pr Understanding Your Soil Test Report Grant E. Cardon Jan Kotuby-Amacher Pam Hole Rich Koenig General Information

Meat Standards Australia (MSA), an eating quality

Jennifer Aalhus, Agriculture and Agri food of Canada

The effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride on carcass cutability, tenderness, and sensory characteristics of calf-fed Holstein steers

Meat Standards Australia Breeding for Improved MSA Compliance & Increased MSA Index Values

Effects of Feeding Calcium Salts of Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) to Finishing Steers

Grower-Finisher Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Pigs Fed Genetically Modified Bt Corn

Evaluating consumer acceptability of various muscles from the beef chuck and rib 1

Feedlot Performance of Cattle Program Fed Supplemental Protein

Using body condition scoring to fine tune herd nutrition and health management has become a widely accepted practice. This presentation is designed to

What makes a car run? What does interdependent mean? Can only one system function onit s own? What is the purpose of a skeletal system???

EFFECTS OF ENERGY INTAKE LEVEL DURING THE GROWING PHASE ON FEEDLOT STEER PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS COMPOSITION

Economics of Increased Beef Grader Accuracy. by Maro A. Ibarburu, John D. Lawrence, and Darrell Busby

LIST OF IMPORTED PORK PRODUCTS WHICH WILL BE EXEMPT FROM FURTHER PROCESSING ON ARRIVAL IN SOUTH AFRICA FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2017

STUDIES ON FEEDING WHEAT MIDDLINGS TO BEEF HEIFERS AND GROWING AND FINISHING BEEF STEERS

Growth and Carcass Characteristics of Pigs Fed Bt and Non-Bt Corn and Harvested at US and European Market Weights

High Plains Biofuels Co-Product Nutrition Conference. February 20, Garden City, KS.

Grain fed beef is sourced from cattle that have been fed on a nutritionally balanced, high energy ration for a minimum specified number of days.

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXIII December 3, 4 and 5, 2013 Rapid City, South Dakota

The Effect of a Wheat Gluten Supplement In a Steer Fattening Ration Comprised of Varying Levels of Wheat

Can We Allow a Calf to Have a Bad Day? Dr. Matt Hersom UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences

Lamb Meating Consumer Expectations. Hamish Chandler Genetics Program Manager MLA

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE FEEDING LEVEL ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY

Live Animal Evaluation Using Linear Measurement Produced by Laurel Hoffman

INFLUENCE OF DIETARY NIACIN ON FINISHING PIG PERFORMANCE AND MEAT QUALITY

By Neal Smith Extension Area Specialist 4-H

National Consumer Beef Study

Meat Quality; F t a / t/ M arbling

DETERMINATION OF FAT PERCENTAGE USING THREE DIFFERENT METHODS WITHIN MARBLING SCORES ON BEEF LONGISSIMUS MUSCLE. A Thesis.

The effects of grade, gender, and postmortem treatment on beef. I. Composition, cutability, and meat quality

Sprenger Cattle Co. Angus Bull Sale. Cattle with a Purpose Beyond Performance

Effects of Ractopamine and Carnitine in Diets Containing 5% Fat for Finishing Pigs

Consumer Attitudes Towards Color and Marbling of Fresh Pork

EFFECTS OF BREED OF SIRE AND AGE-SEASON OF FEEDING ON MUSCLE TENDERNESS IN THE BEEF CHUCK

The Effect of Quality Grade and Muscle on Collagen Contents and Tenderness of Intramuscular Connective Tissue and Myofibrillar Protein for Hanwoo Beef

A MASTER'S THESIS MASTER OF CATEGORIZING BEEF MARBLING ROBERT JOSEPH DANLER. submitted in partial fulfillment of the. requirements for the degree

The effects of corn silage feeding level on steer growth performance, feed intake and carcass composition.

Lamb Meating Consumer Expectations Dave Pethick, Sheep CRC & Murdoch University

Relationships between temperament, carcass traits and tenderness in Santa Gertrudis steers

Effect of the Halothane and Rendement Napole Genes on Carcass and Meat Quality Characteristics of Pigs.

Changes in the composition of red meat

By Neal Smith Extension Area Specialist 4-H

Senepol Cattle and Grass Fed Beef. Allen Williams, Ph.D., PAS Tallgrass Beef Company

Quality and Composition of Beef from Cattle Fed Combinations of Steam-flaked Corn, Dry-rolled Corn, and Distiller's Grains with Solubles

GROWTH OF MUSCLE AND FAT IN BEEF STEERS FROM 6 TO 36 MONTHS OF AGE 1. R. L. HINER AND J. BOND U. S. Department o] Agriculture 2

Marbling and Pork Tenderness

Transcription:

extension.usu.edu January 2005 AG/Beef/2005-03 BEEF QUALITY AND YIELD GRADING D. R. ZoBell, D. Whittier, and Lyle Holmgren INTRODUCTION The beef grading system in the United States is an attempt to connect physical carcass traits with quality such as palatability (tenderness, juiciness and flavor). Although the system is based on science it is also somewhat subjective which has been the basis of criticism from those who would like to see changes. In the United States there are two types of beef grades quality grades and yield grades. Quality grades indicate expected palatability or eating satisfaction of the meat; yield grades are estimates of the percentage of boneless, closely trimmed retail cuts from the round, joint, rib and chuck. Beef carcasses may carry a quality grade, a yield grade or both a quality and yield grade (Burson, 2004). SPECIFICS OF THE SYSTEM MARBLING Marbling is the flecks of intramuscular fat distributed in muscle tissue. Marbling is usually evaluated in the ribeye between the 12th and 13th ribs. The extent or degree of marbling is the primary determinant of the quality grade (Taylor and Field, 1999). Marbling has been associated with eating quality, particularly juiciness and flavor, but not necessarily tenderness. Amount of marbling in the eye muscle is divided into ten degrees as shown from lowest to highest: devoid, practically devoid, traces, slight, small, modest, moderate, slightly abundant, moderately abundant and abundant. In actual practice the USDA graders subdivide each degree of marbling into percentages in increments of 10% from 0 to 100% and percentages written as superscripts following the degree of marbling. As an example: moderate would be identified as moderate0, moderate10, moderate20, etc., through moderate100. This would follow for the other marbling degrees (Boggs et al., 1998). Examples of marbling within a ribeye are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Examples of marbling within a ribeye. In addition to marbling, there are other ways to evaluate muscle for quality. Firmness of muscle is desirable, as is proper color and texture. Desirable ribeyes will exhibit an adequate amount of finely dispersed marbling in a firm, fine textured, bright, cherry-red colored lean. As an animal matures, the characteristics of muscle change, and muscle color becomes darker and muscle texture becomes coarser (Hale et al., 2004). MATURITY Degree of maturity, or physiological age as determined from bone and lean maturity, may not be the same as the actual age of the animal in months or years. However, approximate chronological age groupings for maturity degrees are as follows (Burson, 2004): Maturity Age A B C D E 9-30 months 30-42 months (2 1/2-3 1/2 years) 42-72 months (3 1/2-6 years) 72-96 months (6-8 years) over 96 months (over 8 years) Maturity is estimated visually by cartilage ossification (hardening of cartilage into bone), rib bone shapes, and lean color and texture. During the early stages of growth, more ossification occurs in the hind portion of the backbone (sacral and lumbar vertebrae), progressing with advancing maturity toward the forequarter (thoracic vertebrae). As animals advance from A to E maturity, there is fusion of the sacral vertebrae, more ossification of the cartilage tips of the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae occurs, and rib bones become wider and flatter (Table 1). In young beef carcasses the lean flesh is light cherry red in color and fine in texture. With advancing maturity the lean becomes progressively darker in color and more coarsely textured. Mature carcasses (D and E) may have lean that is dark red and coarse textured. Carcass maturity is determined initially from the skeletal characteristics and adjustments made according to the lean characteristics. The final maturity of the carcass cannot be adjusted more than one full maturity group from the maturity indicated by its bones and cartilages.

Table 1. Guidelines for Determining Skeletal Maturity. Maturity Sacral Vertebrae Lumbar Vertebrae Thoracic Vertebrae A B Distinct separation to completely fused Completely fused completely ossified Cartilage evident to nearly completely ossified Nearly completed ossified to ossified (10-25% ossified) No ossification to slight evidence of ossification Partially ossified to moderately ossified C Completely fused Completely ossified Moderately ossified to considerable ossification with cartilage outline plainly visible (30-70%) D Completely fused Completely ossified Considerable ossification with cartilage outlines plainly visible to barely visible (70-100%) E Completely fused Completely ossified Cartilage outline barely visible to completely ossified QUALITY GRADING The beef quality grades are Prime, Choice, Select, Standard, Commercial, Utility, Cutter and Canner. Since quality grading is voluntary, not all carcasses are quality graded. Packers may apply their own house brand to merchandise their beef. Carcasses merchandised as ungraded beef usually are those that do not grade Choice or Prime. They generally are termed No Roll beef by the industry, because a grade stamp has not been rolled on the carcass (Burson, 2004). *Assumes that firmness of lean is comparably developed with the degree of marbling and that the carcass is not a dark cutter. **Maturity increases from left to right (A through E). ***The A maturity portion of the figure is the only portion applicable to bullock carcasses. Figure 2. Relationship between marbling, maturing and carcass quality grade* (Burson, 2004).

FINAL QUALITY GRADE (HALE, 2004) After the degree of maturity and marbling has been established, the final quality grade is determined. Meat graders assign a yield grade to a carcass by evaluating: 1. The amount of external fat; 2. The hot carcass weight; 3. The amount of kidney, pelvic, and heart fat; and 4. The area of the ribeye muscle. Graders evaluate the amount of external fat at the 12th rib by measuring the thickness of fat three-fourths the length of the ribeye from the chine. They adjust this measurement to reflect unusual amounts of fat in other areas of the carcass. Carcass weight is the hot or unchilled weight in pounds (taken on the slaughter-dressing floor shortly after slaughter). The amount of kidney, pelvic, and heart (KPH) fat is evaluated subjectively and is expressed as a percentage of the carcass weight (this usually will be from 2 to 4 percent of carcass weight). The area of the ribeye is determined by measuring the size (in inches, using a dot-grid) of the ribeye muscle at the 12th rib. YIELD GRADE (HALE, 2004) Yield Grade is the indicated yield of closely trimmed (1/2 inch fat or less), boneless retail cuts expected to be derived from the major wholesale cuts (round, sirloin, short loin, rib, and square-cut chuck) of a carcass. Yield Grade is indicated on a scale of 1 to 5, with Yield Grade 1 representing the highest degree of cutability. Yield Grade equals 2.50 + (2.50 x adjusted fat thickness, inches) + (0.20 x percent kidney, pelvic, and heart fat) + (0.0038 x hot carcass weight, pounds) (0.32 x ribeye area, square inches). DESCRIPTIONS OF THE FIVE YIELD GRADES Yield Grade 1 The carcass is covered with a thin layer of external fat over the loin and rib; there are slight deposits of fat in the flank, cod or udder, kidney, pelvic and heart regions. Yield Grade 2 The carcass is almost completely covered with external fat, but lean is very visible through the fat over the outside of the round, chuck, and neck. Yield Grade 3 The carcass is usually completely covered with external fat; lean is plainly visible through the fat only on the lower part of the outside of the round and neck. Yield Grade 4 The carcass is usually completely covered with external fat, except that muscle is visible in the shank, outside of the flank and plate regions. There are usually large deposits of fat in the flank, cod or udder, kidney, pelvic and heart regions. Yield Grade 5 Generally, the carcass is covered with a thick layer of fat on all external surfaces. Extensive fat is found in the brisket, cod or udder, kidney, pelvic and heart regions. A short cut method to determine USDA beef yield grade is shown in Table 2. Base yield grade: 3.0 =.40 Backfat; 600 lb Hot carcass weight; 11.0 sq in REA; 3.5% KPH. PYG = Preliminary Yield Grade

As an example: A carcass has.40 in. of backfat; 750 lb carcass; 13.0 in. ribeye area and 3.0% KPH, using the above table to determine yield grade: PYG = 3.00 +.80 (adjustment for carcass weight) -.66 (adjustment for ribeye area) -.10 (adjustment for KPH) = 3.04. In the official USDA grading program the decimals are dropped and the yield grade is reported as 3. Table 2. Short cut method to determine yield grade. Variable Backfat PYG 0.00 2.00 1.10 2.25 0.20 2.50 0.30 2.75 0.40 3.00 0.50 3.25 0.60 3.50 0.70 3.75 0.80 4.00 Backfat Carcass Weight Ribeye Size KPH Carcass Wt. 850 800 750 700 650 600 550 500 Ribeye 14.0 13.5 13.0 12.5 12.0 11.5 11.0 10.5 10.0 9.5 KPH 1.0% 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Adjustment +1.0 +.6 +.8 +.4 +.2 None -.2 -.4 Adjustment -.99 -.82 -.66 -.49 -.33 -.16 None +.16 +.33 +.49 Adjustment -.50 -.40 -.30 -.20 -.10 None +.10 +.20 +.30

Table 3. Relationship between yield grades and cutability (Burson, 2004). Yield Grade % Boneless, Closely Trimmed Retail Cuts From the Round, Loin, Rib and Chuck 1 52.6-54.6 2 50.3-52.3 3 48.0-50.0 4 45.7-47.7 5 43.3-45.4 CONCLUSIONS The U.S. beef grading system continues to be used to determine carcass characteristics and often as a means to set price for the producer. However, components of the system are subjective which can lead to inaccuracies. Additionally the system does not address quality from a palatability or tenderness perspective to the extent it should. Marbling can make beef more tender as fat is less resistant to shear force and fat lubricates the mouth while chewing. However, tenderness is as much a function of muscle structure and management factors relative to the carcass. At some point the beef industry will need to develop a system that also addresses tenderness so that consumers will have additional information for their buying decisions. REFERENCES Boggs, Donald, Robert A. Merkel, and Matthew E. Doumit. 1998. Livestock and Carcasses, 5 th Ed. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA. Burson, D.E. 2004. Quality and yield grades for beef carcasses. North Central Regional Extension Publication No. 357. http://ianrpubs.unl.edu/beef/rp357.htm. Taylor, Robert E., and Thomas G. Field. 1999. Beef Production and Management Decisions, 3 rd Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Hale, D.S., K. Goodson, and J.W. Savell. 2004. Beef Grading. http://meat.tamu.edu/beefgrading.html. Department of Animal Science, Texas Agricultural Extension Service Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Utah State University is committed to providing an environment free from harassment and other forms of illegal discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age (40 and older), disability, and veteran s status. USU s policy also prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in employment and academic related practices and decisions. Utah State University employees and students cannot, because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or veteran s status, refuse to hire; discharge; promote; demote; terminate; discriminate in compensation; or discriminate regarding terms, privileges, or conditions of employment, against any person otherwise qualified. Employees and students also cannot discriminate in the classroom, residence halls, or in on/off campus, USU-sponsored events and activities. This publication is issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work. Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Jack M. Payne, Vice President and Director, Cooperative Extension Service, Utah State University.